ReportWire

Tag: gravity

  • How to Run on the Moon

    How to Run on the Moon

    [ad_1]

    When the elevator is stopped, the two forces are equal and opposite, and the net force is zero. But if you’re accelerating upward, the net force must also be upward. This means the normal force exceeds the gravitational force (shown by the lengths of the two arrows above). So you feel heavier when the normal force increases. We can call the normal force your “apparent weight.”

    Get it? You’re in this box and it looks like nothing’s changing, but you feel yourself being pulled downward by stronger gravity. That’s because your frame of reference, the seemingly motionless elevator car, is in fact zooming upward. Basically, we’re shifting from how you see it inside the system to how someone outside the system sees it.

    Could you build an elevator on the moon and have it accelerate fast enough to regain your earthly weight? Theoretically, yeah. This is what Einstein’s equivalence principle states: There is no difference between a gravitational field and an accelerating reference frame.

    A Roundabout Solution

    But you see the problem: To keep accelerating upward for even a few minutes, the elevator shaft would have to be absurdly tall, and you’d soon reach equally ridiculous speeds. But wait! There’s another way to produce an acceleration: move in a circle.

    Here’s a physics riddle for you: What are the three controls in a car that make it accelerate? Answer: the gas pedal (to speed up), the brake (to slow down), and the steering wheel (to change direction). Yes, all of these are accelerations!

    Remember, acceleration is the rate of change of velocity, and here’s the key thing: Velocity in physics is a vector. It has a magnitude, which we call its speed, but it also has a specific direction. Turn the car and you’re accelerating, even if your speed is unchanged.

    So what if you just drove in a circle? Then you’d be constantly accelerating without going anywhere. This is called centripetal acceleration (ac), which means center-pointing: An object moving in a circle is accelerating toward the center, and the magnitude of this acceleration depends on the speed (v) and the radius (R):

    Courtesy of Rhett Allain

    [ad_2]

    Rhett Allain

    Source link

  • A Warp Drive Breakthrough Inches a Tiny Bit Closer to ‘Star Trek’

    A Warp Drive Breakthrough Inches a Tiny Bit Closer to ‘Star Trek’

    [ad_1]

    A team of physicists has discovered that it’s possible to build a real, actual, physical warp drive and not break any known rules of physics. One caveat: The vessel doing the warping can’t exceed the speed of light, so you’re not going to get anywhere interesting anytime soon. But this research still represents an important advance in our understanding of gravity.

    Moving Without Motion

    Einstein’s general theory of relativity is a tool kit for solving problems involving gravity that connects mass and energy with deformations in spacetime. In turn, those spacetime deformations instruct the mass and energy how to move. In almost all cases, physicists use the equations of relativity to figure out how a particular combination of objects will move. They have some physical scenario, like a planet orbiting a star or two black holes colliding, and they ask how those objects deform spacetime and what the subsequent evolution of the system should be.

    But it’s also possible to run Einstein’s math in reverse by imagining some desired motion and asking what kind of spacetime deformation can make it possible. This is how the Mexican physicist Miguel Alcubierre discovered the physical basis for a warp drive—long a staple of the Star Trek franchise.

    The goal of a warp drive is to get from A to B in the time between commercial breaks, which typically involves faster-than-light motion. But special relativity expressly forbids speeds faster than light. While this never bothered the writers of Star Trek, it did irritate Alcubierre. He discovered that it was possible to build a warp drive through a clever manipulation of spacetime, arranging it so that space in front of a vessel gets scrunched up and the space behind the vessel stretched out. This generates motion without, strictly speaking, movement.

    It sounds like a contradiction, but that’s just one of the many wonderful aspects of general relativity. Alcubierre’s warp drive avoids violations of the speed-of-light limit because it never moves through space; instead space itself is manipulated to, in essence, bring the spacecraft’s destination closer to it.

    While tantalizing, Alcubierre’s design has a fatal flaw. To provide the necessary distortions of spacetime, the spacecraft must contain some form of exotic matter, typically regarded as matter with negative mass. Negative mass has some conceptual problems that seem to defy our understanding of physics, like the possibility that if you kick a ball that weighs negative 5 kilograms, it will go flying backwards, violating conservation of momentum. Plus, nobody has ever seen any object with negative mass existing in the real universe, ever.

    These problems with negative mass have led physicists to propose various versions of “energy conditions” as supplements to general relativity. These aren’t baked into relativity itself, but add-ons needed because general relativity allows things like negative mass that don’t appear to exist in our universe—these energy conditions keep them out of relativity’s equations. They’re scientists’ response to the unsettling fact that vanilla GR allows for things like superluminal motion, but the rest of the universe doesn’t seem to agree.

    Warp Factor Zero

    The energy conditions aren’t experimentally or observationally proven, but they are statements that concord with all observations of the universe, so most physicists take them rather seriously. And until recently, physicists have viewed those energy conditions as making it absolutely 100 percent clear that you can’t build a warp drive, even if you really wanted to.

    But there is a way around it, discovered by an international team of physicists led by Jared Fuchs at the University of Alabama in Huntsville. (The team is also affiliated with the Applied Propulsion Laboratory of Applied Physics, a virtual think tank dedicated to the research of, among many other things, warp drives.) In a paper accepted for publication in the journal Classical and Quantum Gravity, the researchers dug deep into relativity to explore if any version of a warp drive could work.

    [ad_2]

    Paul Sutter, Ars Technica

    Source link

  • WTF Fun Fact 13676 – We Can’t Burp in Space

    WTF Fun Fact 13676 – We Can’t Burp in Space

    [ad_1]

    People can’t burp in space.

    Now, you might wonder, why on Earth (or rather, off Earth) can’t astronauts do something as simple as burping? It boils down to gravity, or the lack thereof.

    Why We Can’t Burp in Space

    Here on Earth, gravity does a lot of work for us without us even noticing. When you eat or drink, gravity helps separate the liquid and gas in your stomach. The solids and liquids stay at the bottom, while the gas, being lighter, floats to the top. When there’s enough gas, your body naturally expels it as a burp. Simple, right?

    But, take gravity out of the equation, and things get a bit more complicated. In space, there’s no up or down like here on Earth. This means that in an astronaut’s stomach, gas doesn’t rise above the liquid and solid. Instead, everything floats around in a mixed-up blob.

    If an astronaut tries to burp, they’re not just going to expel the gas. No, they might bring up some of the liquid and solid matter too. Not exactly pleasant, and definitely something you’d want to avoid.

    NASA Burp Training

    NASA, being aware of this, actually trains astronauts on how to eat and drink in a way that minimizes the chances of needing to burp. They choose foods that are less likely to produce gas. Also, space food is designed to reduce crumbs and loose particles, which can be a nuisance in microgravity. Even with these precautions, though, the human body can still produce gas, thanks to the digestion process.

    So, what happens to all that gas if it can’t come out as a burp? Well, it has to go somewhere. The body adapts in interesting ways. The gas might get absorbed into the bloodstream and expelled through the lungs. Or it might travel through the digestive tract and leave the body as flatulence. Yes, astronauts can still fart in space, which, without gravity to direct the flow, might be a bit more… interesting.

    This isn’t just a quirky fact about space travel; it has real implications for astronaut health and comfort. Gas build-up can cause discomfort, bloating, and even pain. In the confined, zero-gravity environment of a spacecraft, managing these bodily functions becomes crucial for maintaining the well-being and harmony of the crew.

    Bodies in Space

    It’s funny to think about, but this no-burp scenario highlights a broader point about space travel. Living in space requires us to relearn and adapt basic bodily functions. Everything from sleeping to eating to going to the bathroom is different up there. Astronauts undergo extensive training to prepare for these challenges, learning how to live in a world without gravity’s guiding hand.

    In the grand scheme of things, the inability to burp is just one small part of the vast array of adjustments humans must make to thrive in space. It serves as a reminder of how finely tuned our bodies are to life on Earth, and how much we take for granted the invisible forces that shape our everyday experiences.

     WTF fun facts

    Source: “Ask an Explainer” — Smithsonian Institution

    [ad_2]

    WTF

    Source link

  • Babies in space? Scientists grow mice embryos 400 miles above Earth

    Babies in space? Scientists grow mice embryos 400 miles above Earth

    [ad_1]

    In a world first, embryos have been sent to space so that scientists can study how zero-gravity affects a growing fetus.

    The mouse embryos were sent to the International Space Station to be raised by astronauts, with the scientists discovering that the embryos were able to successfully develop, according to a paper in the journal iScience.

    This has huge implications for the future of human space travel and how reproduction and gestation are affected by zero-g, and marks “the world’s first experiment that cultured early-stage mammalian embryos under complete microgravity of ISS,” the authors of the paper said in a statement.

    The development of mouse embryos to blastocysts under microgravity on the ISS. Scientists have found that these embryos developed nearly as successfully as those on Earth.
    Teruhiko Wakayama/University of Yamanashi/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2023.108177

    The researchers, from University of Yamanashi’s Advanced Biotechnology Centre and the Japan Aerospace Space Agency (JAXA), sent the frozen mouse embryos to the ISS—orbiting at a distance of around 400 miles above the surface—via a rocket in August 2021. Astronauts aboard the ISS then thawed the embryos, which were initially at the two-cell stage and grew them for four days, around a quarter of the 20-day gestation period for a mouse, at both artificial 1-g and zero-g.

    They found that they developed normally into blastocysts, which are embryos that have differentiated into two cell types: the inner cell mass (ICM) or embryoblast, and an outer layer of trophoblast cells. The researchers then compared the development of the embryos with those cultured on Earth, finding that while those grown in space had a slightly lower survival rate, but were still successful at developing.

    “The embryos cultured under microgravity conditions developed into blastocysts with normal cell numbers, ICM, trophectoderm, and gene expression profiles similar to those cultured under artificial-1 g control on the International Space Station and ground-1 g control, which clearly demonstrated that gravity had no significant effect on the blastocyst formation and initial differentiation of mammalian embryos,” the authors wrote in the paper.

    It has long been wondered if the microgravity of space will impact the gestation of a fetus, which is a pressing question if humans are to further step toward the stars.

    “There is a possibility of pregnancy during a future trip to Mars because it will take more than 6 months to travel there,” lead author Teruhiko Wakayama of the University of Yamanashi in Japan, told New Scientist. “We are conducting research to ensure we will be able to safely have children if that time comes.”

    This study did not explore how the embryos developed post-blastocyst stage, however, which may come with a whole new swath of issues.

    embryo journey
    Graphical abstract of the paper showing the embryos’ journey.
    Teruhiko Wakayama/University of Yamanashi/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2023.108177

    Wakayama previously found in 2009 that microgravity affected a fertilized egg’s ability to implant in the uterus but did not affect the fertilization itself. Additionally, other experiments with pregnant rodents in space found that lack of gravity affected vestibular development during gestation—affecting the offspring’s balance and equilibrium—as well as impacts on fetal musculoskeletal development.

    The authors say that much more research is required into how zero-g and space environments can impact the growth of fetuses.

    embryos
    Images from the paper. (D) Thawing by astronaut under microgravity. (E–G) Blastocysts collected from the ETC cultured on ground control (E), artificial-1G on the ISS (F), and microgravity on the ISS (G).
    Teruhiko Wakayama/University of Yamanashi/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2023.108177

    “Based on these reports and our results, perhaps mammalian space reproduction is possible, although it may be somewhat affected. Unfortunately, the number of blastocysts obtained from the ISS experiment was not abundant; and we have not been able to confirm the impact on offspring because we have not produced offspring from embryos developed in space,” the authors wrote in the paper.

    “The study of mammalian reproduction in space is essential to start the space age, making it necessary to study and clarify the effect of space environment before the ISS is no longer operational.”

    Do you have a tip on a science story that Newsweek should be covering? Do you have a question about embryonic development? Let us know via science@newsweek.com.