ReportWire

Tag: Dental Health

  • Garlic extract rivals traditional mouthwash for dental hygiene in surprising new review

    NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

    A new review from the University of Sharjah suggests that mouthwash made with garlic extract may fight germs as effectively as chlorhexidine, a widely used antiseptic in dental care.

    Chlorhexidine, a common ingredient in mouthwash, is often considered the gold standard for reducing bacteria, but it can come with its own drawbacks. The researchers wanted to see whether garlic, long known for antimicrobial properties, could offer a natural alternative.

    “Chlorhexidine… is associated with side effects and concerns over antimicrobial resistance,” the authors explained in a press release.

    “Garlic, known for natural antimicrobial properties, has emerged as a potential alternative,” the review notes.

    TREATING GUM DISEASE COULD REDUCE RISK OF HEART ATTACKS AND STROKES, STUDY SUGGESTS

    Garlic has natural antimicrobial properties, prompting researchers to examine how it holds up against current mouthwash ingredients. (iStock)

    To explore this, the team searched six scientific databases. They began with 389 studies, but after applying strict criteria, only five clinical trials qualified for inclusion in their reviews.

    These studies compared garlic extract mouthwash with chlorhexidine, and the authors used a standardized framework to structure their questions and measures.

    Man pouring antiseptic mouthwash.

    Chlorhexidine is a common ingredient in antibacterial mouthwash. (iStock)

    The results suggested that higher-concentration garlic mouthwash showed antimicrobial effects similar to chlorhexidine.

    The review explains that the “effectiveness varied based on mouthwash concentration and duration of application, contributing to differences in outcomes.”

    FRUIT-BASED INGREDIENT MAY HELP FIGHT GUM DISEASE NATURALLY, SCIENTISTS DISCOVER

    “Some studies favored chlorhexidine for maintaining higher plaque/salivary pH,” it continued, “while others reported garlic extract to be more effective at certain concentrations.” 

    Overall, the evidence points to garlic having meaningful antimicrobial activity in the mouth.

    “However, garlic mouthwash may cause greater discomfort,” the review notes.

    Closeup smiling woman face hold and smelling head, clove of garlic and greenery on table in kitchen.

    In some of the studies reviewed, garlic extract appeared to be more effective than mouthwash at certain concentrations. (iStock)

    Garlic mouthwash was linked to a burning sensation and an unpleasant flavor, which could affect how willing people are to use it regularly.

    CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

    Important to note is that only a few clinical trials were available, despite a large initial pool of research.

    Additionally, the studies that met the criteria used different garlic concentrations, different dosing schedules, and different measures of success, which made direct comparisons difficult.

    “However, garlic mouthwash may cause greater discomfort.”

    CLICK HERE FOR MORE LIFESTYLE STORIES

    Much of the broader research on garlic extract remains laboratory-based rather than clinical, so there is still limited evidence from real-world use in humans.

    CLICK HERE TO SIGN UP FOR OUR LIFESTYLE NEWSLETTER

    Because of these constraints, the authors emphasize that larger, carefully designed clinical trials are needed before garlic extract mouthwash can be considered a reliable alternative to chlorhexidine. 

    Longer study periods would also help determine whether the early signs of effectiveness hold up over time.

    TEST YOURSELF WITH OUR LATEST LIFESTYLE QUIZ

    The findings were published in the Journal of Herbal Medicine. 

    Source link

  • 6 Signs Your Dog or Cat May Benefit from Supplements | Animal Wellness Magazine

    6 Signs Your Dog or Cat May Benefit from Supplements | Animal Wellness Magazine

    Every dog and cat parent will face unique challenges with their fur baby, and there are many issues you can help support with the right supplements. Here are six signs supplements might benefit your dog or cat!

    A good diet and regular exercise go a long way in supporting canine and feline health. However, diet, environment, genetics, and other factors also influence health. Seasonal allergies, skin & coat challenges, digestive issues, changing appetite or energy levels—all these issues may indicate that your fur baby might benefit from supplements. Let’s look at some of these issues and how you can help support whole-body health from the inside out!

    1. Skin and Coat Health

    Skin and coat health is important for dogs and cats for many reasons. Fur provides insulation, protects them from the elements, and even helps them communicate. Similarly, the skin provides protection from bacteria, helps regulate temperature and maintain moisture balance, and more. A supplement that provides nutritional benefits can help support skin and coat health if you notice changes in their skin and coat condition.

    2. Joint Health, Comfort, and Mobility

    Joint health challenges, especially associated with aging or active pets are common, and they can impact mobility, activity levels, and quality of life. Supplements that help to promote a healthy inflammatory response may help dogs and cats with their joints and mobility.

    3. Digestive and Gut Health

    Digestive health is linked to whole body health because it plays a role in nutrient absorption, energy production, immune health, hormone regulation, and more. As such, healthy digestion contributes to healthy stool consistency, a healthy appetite, good energy levels, and comfort after eating. Supplements that support overall health can also help to support a healthy gut if you notice changes in their digestive health.

    4. Changing Energy Levels

    Not all dogs and cats are built the same when it comes to energy levels. Some are dedicated couch potatoes, some don’t mind exercise, and others jump at every chance for play or activity. A sign that you may need to consult with your veterinarian, however, is if you notice a change in their energy levels. Ensuring your dog or cat gets all the right nutrients through diet and supplements can help them maintain their energy levels and keep them spry and playful.

    5. Dental Health

    Good dental health supports physical and mental well-being in dogs and cats. Strong teeth help dogs and cats chew, help keep their mouths pain-free, and encourage them to enjoy their food. In turn, the right food and supplements can help build and maintain strong teeth.

    6. Age-Related Needs

    Animals have different needs at different life stages, and diet alone may not always provide adequate support. For example, puppies and kittens need additional nutrients as they grow to ensure healthy development. On the other end of the spectrum, senior dogs and cats have their own needs and can often benefit from additional support for their joints, mobility, energy levels, vision, brain health, and weight management.

    Support Whole-Body Health with Whole-Food Supplements

    Spirited Paw whole food-based supplements are formulated with human-quality ingredients to support healthy dogs and cats. Whether your pup or kitty needs additional support for dental health, joints & mobility, or overall health and vitality, Spirited Paw has high-quality supplements that supply nutrients, minerals, and functional ingredients.

    Visit Spirited Paw to learn more!


    Post Views: 28


    Animal Wellness is North America’s top natural health and lifestyle magazine for dogs and cats, with a readership of over one million every year. AW features articles by some of the most renowned experts in the pet industry, with topics ranging from diet and health related issues, to articles on training, fitness and emotional well being.

    Animal Wellness

    Source link

  • Sugar and Gaining Weight  | NutritionFacts.org

    Sugar and Gaining Weight  | NutritionFacts.org

    The sugar industry responds to evidence implicating sweeteners in the obesity epidemic. 
     
    In terms of excess body fat, the “well-documented obesity epidemic may merely be the tip of the overfat iceberg.” It’s been estimated that 91 percent of adults—nine out of ten of us—and 69 percent of children in the United States are overfat, a condition defined as having “excess body fat sufficient to impair health.” This can occur even in individuals who are “normal-weight and non-obese, often due to excess abdominal fat.” The way to tell if you’re overfat is if your waist circumference is more than half your height. What’s causing this epidemic? As I discuss in my video Does Sugar Lead to Weight Gain?, one primary cause may be all the added sugars we’re eating
     
    A century ago, sugar was heralded as one of the cheapest forms of calories in the diet. Just ten cents’ worth of sugar could furnish thousands of calories. Dr. Fredrick Stare, “Harvard’s sugar-pushing nutritionist,” bristled at the term “empty calories,” writing that the calories in sugar were “not empty but full of energy”—in other words, full of calories, which we are now getting too much of. The excess bodyweight of the U.S. population corresponds to about a daily 350- to 500-calorie excess on average. So, “to revert the obesity epidemic,” that’s how many calories we have to reduce, but which calories should we cut? As you can see below and at 1:33 in my video, the majority of Americans who fail to meet the Dietary Guidelines’ sugar limit get about that many calories in added sugars every day: Twenty-five teaspoons’ worth of added sugars is about 400 calories. 

    There are die-hard sugar defenders. James Rippe, for example, was reportedly paid $40,000 a month by the high fructose corn syrup industry—and that was on top of the $10 million it paid for his research. Even Dr. Rippe considers it “undisputable that sugars…contribute to obesity. It is also undisputable that sugar reduction…should be part of any weight loss program.” And, of all sources of calories to limit, since sugar is just empty calories and contains no essential nutrients, “reducing sugar consumption is obviously the place to start.” And, again, this is what the researchers funded by the likes of Dr. Pepper and Coca-Cola are saying. The primary author of “Dietary Sugar and Body Weight: Have We Reached a Crisis in the Epidemic of Obesity and Diabetes?…,” Richard Kahn, is infamous for his defense of the American Beverage Association—the soda industry—and he was the chief science officer at the American Diabetes Association when it signed a million-dollar sponsorship deal with the world’s largest candy company. “Maybe the American Diabetes Association should rename itself the American Junk Food Association,” said the director of a consumer advocacy group. What do you expect from an organization that was started with drug industry funding? 
     
    The bottom line is that “randomised controlled trials show that increasing sugars intake increases energy [calorie] intake” and “increasing sugar intake leads to body weight gain in adults, and…sugar reduction leads to body weight loss in children.” For example, when researchers randomized individuals to either increase or decrease their intake of table sugar, the added sugar group gained about three and a half pounds over ten weeks, whereas the reduced sugar group lost about two and a half pounds. A systematic review and meta-analysis of all such ad libitum diet studies—real-life studies where sugar levels were changed but people could otherwise eat whatever they wanted—found that reduced intake of dietary sugars resulted in a decrease in body weight, whereas “increased sugars intake was associated with a comparable weight increase.” The researchers found that, “considering the rapid weight gain that occurs after an increased intake of sugars, it seems reasonable to conclude that advice relating to sugars intake is a relevant component of a strategy to reduce the high risk of overweight and obesity in most countries.” That is, it’s reasonable to advise people to cut down on their sugar consumption. 
     
    Findings from observational studies have been “more ambiguous,” though, with an association found between obesity and intake of sweetened beverages, but failing to show consistent correlations with consumption of sugary foods. Most such studies rely on self-reported data, however, and “it is likely that this has introduced bias, especially as underreporting of diet has been found to be more prevalent among obese people and it is sugar-rich foods that are most commonly underreported.” However, one can measure trace sucrose levels in the urine, which gives an objective measure of actual sugar intake and also excludes contributions from other sweeteners such as high fructose corn syrup. When researchers did this, they discovered that, indeed, sugar intake is not only associated with greater odds of obesity and greater waist circumference on a snapshot-in-time cross-sectional basis, but that was also seen in a prospective cohort study over time. “Using urinary sucrose as the measure of sucrose intake,” researchers found that “participants in the highest v. the lowest quintile [fifth] for sucrose intake had 54% greater risk of being overweight or obese.” 
     
    Denying evidence that sugars are harmful to health has always been at the heart of the sugar industry’s defense.” But when the evidence is undeniable, like the link between sugar and cavities, it switches from denial to deflection, like trying to pull attention away from restricting intake to coming up with some kind of “vaccine against tooth decay.” We seem to have reached a similar point with obesity, with the likes of the Sugar Bureau switching from denial to deflection by commissioning research suggesting that obese individuals would not benefit from losing weight, a stance contradicted by hundreds of studies across four continents involving more than ten million participants. 
     
    For more on Big Sugar’s influence, check out Sugar Industry Attempts to Manipulate the Science
     
    You may also be interested in some of my other popular videos on sugar. See related videos below.

    Michael Greger M.D. FACLM

    Source link

  • Tap, Filtered, or Bottled Water?  | NutritionFacts.org

    Tap, Filtered, or Bottled Water?  | NutritionFacts.org

    There are disinfection byproducts in tap water. What happened when Brita, PUR, ZeroWater, and refrigerator water filters were put to the test? 

    Though many distrust the safety of tap water, a study of 35 brands of bottled water did not find them to be necessarily safer, cleaner, or of a higher quality than water straight out of the faucet. How much is that saying, though? Two studies published in the 1970s “changed forever the earlier perspective that drinking water safety was only about waterborne disease.” In fact, it was our fight against microbial contaminants that led to a new kind of contamination—in the form of disinfection byproducts.  

    The two landmark papers in 1974 solved the mystery of the source of chloroform in drinking water: We met the enemy, and he is us. The chlorination of drinking water—“disinfection [that] is crucial for maintaining the microbiological safety of water”—was interacting with natural organic matter from the water’s source and creating chlorinated compounds that can not only result in off-flavors and smells but also pose a potential public health risk. More than 600 disinfection byproducts have been identified so far. 

    After decades of research into the matter, it appears that the life-long ingestion of chlorinated drinking water results in “clear excess risk” for bladder cancer. There is also some evidence of increased risk of certain types of birth defects, but most of the concern has focused on the bladder cancer link. Forty years of exposure may increase your odds of bladder cancer by 27 percent. The Environmental Protection Agency estimated that 2 to 17 percent of bladder cancer cases in the United States are due to these disinfection byproducts in drinking water. However, this assumes the link is one of cause and effect, which has yet to be firmly established. 

    The best way to reduce risk is to treat the cause. Countries could prevent the formation of disinfection byproducts in the first place through the better initial removal of source water’s “natural organic matter” (what my grandmother would have called schmutz). Some countries in Europe, such as Switzerland, the Netherlands, Austria, and Germany, have newer, well-maintained drinking water systems that can distribute tap water free from residual disinfectants, but the cost to upgrade the infrastructure of even a small city in the United States could run in the tens of millions of dollars. As the tragedy in Flint, Michigan, revealed, we seem to have trouble keeping even frank toxins out of the tap. 

    Nearly 40 percent of Americans use some sort of water purification device. I look at the comparisons of these devices in my video Is It Best to Drink Tap, Filtered, or Bottled Water?. Tap water from Tucson, Arizona, was pitted head-to-head against two of the most common purification approaches—pour-through pitchers and refrigerator filters. As you can see in the graph below and at 2:53 in my video, both fridge filters (GE and Whirlpool) did similarly well, removing more than 96 percent of trace organic contaminants, and edging out the three pitcher filters. ZeroWater caught 93 percent, and PUR pitchers got 84 percent. By the time the filters needed to be replaced, Brita was only catching 50 percent. A similar discrepancy was found between filters from PUR and Brita tested specifically against disinfection byproducts. They both started out about the same at the beginning, but by the end of the filter’s life, PUR appeared to do better, as you can see below and at 3:15 in my video. Reverse osmosis systems can work even better, but the cost, water waste, and loss of trace minerals don’t seem worth it.  

    As you can see below and at 3:40 in my video, the annual cost for purifying your water with a pitcher or fridge filter was calculated to be about the same, at only around a penny per cup—with the exception of the ZeroWater brand, which is up to four times more expensive. 

    I always figured the “change by” dates on filters were just company scams to get you to buy more replacements, but I was wrong. Because I drink filtered water mostly just for taste, I used to wait until the water started tasting funky. Bad idea. Not only do the filters eventually lose some of their removal capacity, but bacterial growth can build up inside them, resulting in your “filtered” water having higher bacterial counts than water straight out of the tap. You’d be actually making your water dirtier rather than cleaner, so it is important to replace filters regularly. 

    As an aside, I used to think the same about the advice to change your toothbrush every three months. Which Big Brush executive thought that one up? But, no, I was wrong again. Toothbrushes can build up biofilms of tooth decay bacteria or become breeding grounds for bacteria to flume into the air with each toilet flush before going back into our mouths. Fun fact: A single flush can spew up “millions of bacteria into the atmosphere” that can settle on your nice, moist toothbrush. The good news is that rather than buying new brushes, you can disinfect the head of your toothbrush with as little as a ten-minute soak in white vinegar or, even more frugally, vinegar diluted by half with water.  

    Hydration is important. See related videos below for more information. 

    Avoiding waterborne pollutants if possible is also important. See my videos Lead in Drinking Water and Friday Favorites: Benefits of Turmeric for Arsenic Exposure. 

    How Many Glasses of Water Should We Drink a Day? Watch the video to find out. 

    Michael Greger M.D. FACLM

    Source link

  • Reliance Dental Introduces Scholarship to Promote Better Oral Health Habits for College Students

    Reliance Dental Introduces Scholarship to Promote Better Oral Health Habits for College Students

    Press Release



    updated: Apr 12, 2017

    Reliance Dental, manufacturer of dental acrylics and other dental supplies for over a century, is proud to introduce the Bright Smile Scholarship program.  The program will award $2,500 to help with college, grad school or dental hygienist education costs to a student who practices and helps promote good oral health habits.

    Recent research shows only a little over 50% of Millennials make regular visits to the dentist, the lowest percentage of any age group.  They are busy with college and adjusting to a new lifestyle, plus they are often away from their parents and their dentists, and going to the dentist simply becomes a low priority.   The result is an upturn in Millennial patients who need major dental work because they have failed to see a dentist for several years.

    “We did substantial research during our annual marketing planning process for Reliance, and as far as we can tell, no one has ever used a scholarship as an incentive to encourage better oral care. This program can help both dentists and patients, so there’s really no downside.”

    Tom Baer, President, TBI Marketing

    A requirement of the Bright Smile Scholarship is that applicants must get sign off as practicing good oral health habits by a licensed dental office.  “We’re hoping driving students to a dental office to get sign off for their scholarship application will encourage at least some of them to do more, like getting an annual check-up,” said Tom Rissman, CEO of Reliance Dental.  “Any increase in oral care for this group is a plus.”

    In addition, applicants are required to submit a poster design or social media post promoting the benefits of good dental habits.  This will also help get Millennials thinking about their own dental care, and judging of these designs will be a key factor in who will ultimately be awarded the scholarship.

    The idea for the scholarship came from Reliance’s marketing agency TBI.  TBI president Tom Baer says, “We did substantial research during our annual marketing planning process for Reliance, and as far as we can tell, no one has ever used a scholarship as an incentive to encourage better oral care.  This program can help both dentists and patients, so there’s really no downside.”

    Applications for the scholarship can be made at scholarship.reliancedental.net, and are being accepted through July 15, 2017.  The scholarship will be awarded in early August.

    The program is open to any student, 17 years of age or older who has been accepted to a 2 or 4-year institution of higher learning, or a facility that provides education toward being certified as a registered Dental Hygienist in the 50 United States or District of Columbia.  Students must also have a 3.0 grade point average to qualify.

    More information, including complete rules can be found at www.scholarship.reliancedental.net.

    About Reliance Dental

    Reliance Dental Manufacturing, LLC, a privately held company located in Alsip, Illinois, has been producing dental acrylics and supplies for dentists worldwide for over 100 years, and is renowned for providing only the highest quality products, surprisingly affordable prices, and personal attention to every customer.  Reliance manufactures DuraLay Brand pattern resin and temporary crown and bridge products, as well as DuraSeal temporary filling acrylic and a full line of denture re-line and rebase materials (DuraBase, DuraBase Soft, DuraLiner II, Dura Rely-A-Soft and DuraConditioner).  The fact that Reliance products are used daily by thousands of dentists across the globe is testimony to their high standards for accuracy and reliability.  The company is fully ISO certified and rigorously complies with all requirements for continuous improvements.

    For more company information visit www.reliancedental.net or call 708/597-6694.

    Bright Smile Scholarship Media Contact:

    Tom Baer​
    ​TBI Marketing
    847-274-9003
    ​tom@tombaer.com

    Source: Reliance Dental Manufacturing, LLC

    Source link