ReportWire

Tag: Campus Culture

  • When There’s Nowhere to Live, What’s a University to Do?

    When There’s Nowhere to Live, What’s a University to Do?

    [ad_1]

    Peyton Quijano spent the summer before junior year consolidating her life into her Honda.

    She squeezed her pared-down wardrobe into two small boxes, which fit in the trunk. School supplies and some packaged food went in the passenger seat. The back seat became her bed.

    Quijano, a biology major at the University of California at Santa Cruz, had hoped to win a coveted spot on campus, but she didn’t get one before classes began.

    UC-Santa Cruz has enough campus housing for more than half of its 18,000 undergraduates. That’s a lot; in fact, the university houses one of the highest percentages of its students in the UC system. But Santa Cruz faces a challenge: Housing stock off campus is extremely limited and expensive. Most residences are single-family homes with independent landlords, many of whom are hesitant to rent to students.

    On campus, housing priority is given to freshmen, new transfers, and sophomores, depending on whether they meet certain conditions, as well as first-generation students from California, military veterans, and international students. Even then, there’s no guarantee.

    LiPo Ching for The Chronicle

    Peyton Quijano, a rising senior at the University of California at Santa Cruz, lived temporarily in her car.

    So Quijano started the 2022 fall term living in her car.

    It’s not that university leaders oppose building more student housing. They can’t — at least not easily.

    The topography of the Santa Cruz campus — carved into the side of a mountain, surrounded by a protected forest — means there’s almost nowhere to build. When university officials find land on campus and make a plan, they get sued by local residents who fear the impacts of growth. The court fights drag on for years. Meanwhile, the University of California’s Board of Regents wants the system’s campuses to enroll even more students, citing high demand for a UC education.

    Across the country, colleges struggle with housing shortages from time to time, and administrators make contingency plans. What’s happening at Santa Cruz, though, isn’t a one-time crunch. It’s a systemic, structural logjam with no clear way out.

    University leaders say they’re committed to easing the strain, pushing ahead on construction projects that will take years to complete. In the meantime, many Santa Cruz students must shoulder the stress of trying to get through college without having their basic needs fully met.

    Ask any Santa Cruz student about housing, and they’ll have a story to tell.

    Their housemate who dropped out for a quarter to save money for rent; their friends who commute 35 miles from San Jose every day, up and down the notoriously hazardous narrow shoulders and tight turns of Highway 17; the guy in their econ class who rents a driveway so he can live safely in his car for $500 a month.

    Most students will also tell you that they didn’t know just how hard it would be to find housing until they arrived.

    Homelessness and housing insecurity are longstanding problems in Santa Cruz, a beach town nestled between the central coast and the redwood-forested Santa Cruz mountains that consistently ranks among the most unaffordable places in the country to live.

    The UCSC sociology professors Miriam Greenberg and Steven McKay surveyed Santa Cruz County residents between 2016 and 2018, and found that 50 percent of 1,737 respondents spent over half of their income on rent. The government defines that threshold as “extremely rent burdened.” The researchers then had to invent a new category, “obscenely rent burdened,” for the 26 percent of respondents who said they spent at least 70 percent of their income on rent.

    Then the pandemic hit. Newly remote tech workers moved in. The median price of a single-family home skyrocketed, as did rents. Off-campus houses that had historically been rented to students were bought up and converted into owner-occupied housing.

    The squeeze became untenable — and further complicated an already complicated relationship between Santa Cruz and its largest employer, the university.

    For much of the 20th century, Santa Cruz was a sleepy retirement community. As the U.S. economy boomed in the 1950s, local business leaders pushed for more development. They eagerly lobbied the University of California regents to choose Santa Cruz for the next UC campus.

    The Nine & Ten apartments and International Living Center are surrounded by trees at UC Santa Cruz, in Santa Cruz, California, on Monday, January 23, 2023.

    LiPo Ching for The Chronicle

    UC-Santa Cruz is surrounded by a protected forest, making it difficult to build new campus housing. Off-campus housing is limited and expensive.

    The university’s founding in 1965, though, brought about a sharp political turn to the left. An environmentalist consensus took hold that saw any growth as harmful. Residents didn’t want to see their town grow out or up. Throughout the 1960s and 1970s, city and county leaders adopted measures to limit housing density. They worked.

    “The university’s and the city’s issues became inseparably related to the growth and development sentiments at the time, which was essentially 5,000 ways to say no to growth and development,” said Mayor Fred Keeley of Santa Cruz in an interview.

    City officials have long taken the position that UC-Santa Cruz should house its students on its own campus. The university hasn’t completed a new dorm since 2004. But that’s not for lack of trying.

    In 2017, the university proposed a housing project to accommodate an additional 2,000 students, part of which would be built on the East Meadow, a 17-acre open field on the southern edge of campus. The project has been tied up in court ever since.

    “It’s been extremely frustrating because those lawsuits have real impacts in terms of what it means for UC-Santa Cruz students,” said Scott Hernandez-Jason, assistant vice chancellor for university relations.

    This spring, the UC system’s Board of Regents approved the university’s latest plan for the project, known as Student Housing West. One lawsuit against the plan is pending. For now, construction is slated to begin in early 2024.

    Faculty, alumni, and community members who oppose the project have argued that it would disrupt the aesthetics of the campus. One student retorted: “I don’t have the luxury of worrying about aesthetics.”

    Housing is something that Santa Cruz students always have to think about.

    For the first three weeks of the 2022 fall term, Quijano parked near her friends’ on-campus apartment so she could use their shower. She spent most of her free time at the library. In a pinch, she wrote a couple of papers in the backseat. It wasn’t comfortable, and the Wi-Fi was spotty.

    Then she heard about an open room in the Village, a sprawling collection of cabinlike temporary structures on the east side of campus. She reached out to the university’s housing coordinators and was placed in one of the units, at a cost of $978 a month.

    The walls were thin; cold air and noise could easily get through. There was one shared kitchen. The location was isolated from much of campus, requiring students to hike up a 100-step staircase or walk to the nearest bus stop.

    Quijano worked two part-time jobs: one at a day-care center off campus, and one cleaning the university science department’s autoclaves. Her paychecks were going entirely toward housing, and she wasn’t even that comfortable. She wondered: How would she pay her other bills?

    Peyton Quijano, a third year molecular biology major at UC Santa Cruz poses for a portrait with the car that she lives in, parked at the Crown lot on campus in Santa Cruz, California, on Monday, January 23, 2023.

    LiPo Ching for The Chronicle

    Quijano with her Honda. She recently found housing: a one-bedroom off-campus apartment, shared with three roommates. She considers herself “really lucky.”

    At the end of the fall 2022 term, she made the difficult decision to terminate her housing contract. When classes resumed in January, she was back in her car.

    Zane Chaplin, meanwhile, shared a dorm room with three other sophomores this past academic year. The room used to be a communal lounge for the whole floor. “You can tell because this is here,” Chaplin said, moving the hanging mirror aside to reveal a long rectangular window on the door.

    Over the past two decades, the university has placed 3,300 additional students into existing dorms by “increasing the density.” Officials have added new floors to some buildings. Some rooms host five or six students in bunk beds.

    So Chaplin and his friends felt lucky to have a bit of private space, with lofted beds and desks placed underneath. But as they looked ahead to their junior year, they knew they most likely wouldn’t have a chance at campus housing again.

    Instead, they steeled themselves for the off-campus bidding wars.

    At one point, Chaplin and his friends were eyeing an eight-person house going for about $8,500 per month — a great deal, he said, even though it was a “fixer upper,” to put it nicely. But they knew at least five other groups of students interested in the same property.

    Typically, Chaplin said, students are forced to bid against one other. A landlord will tell a student that another group has put in an offer and ask if the students wants to raise their bid. Or a landlord will just give the property to the other group without sharing the winning price. “It’s a very secretive exchange,” he said.

    Some students will attempt to get on a landlord’s good side by wooing them with baked goods or promises of home improvement. “I have a friend whose group wrote a letter to their landlord about how they were going to do a bunch of gardening while they lived there, and the landlord ended up giving them the place,” Chaplin said.

    Chris Minnig, who graduated this spring, hit the jackpot for his last year: a spot in Camper Park. The 42-space complex “is similar to living in a campground,” the university’s website states. It’s by far the most affordable campus-housing option, at around $700 a month.

    Residents have to do without a few things that most undergraduate students would take for granted. “If having a consistent internet connection with reliable service within your campus residence is important to you, or for the academic work that you are engaged in,” the university says, “then the Camper Park is not an appropriate choice for you.”

    Still, each trailer has a full bed, a kitchen with running water, a mini fridge, and a small table. If students can put up with minor inconveniences, like sharing communal bathrooms and emptying out the water tank every week, “it’s a frickin’ no-brainer,” Minnig said. Especially compared with his accommodations in 2020, as a first-term transfer student.

    At the time, Minnig said, he managed to find a place to live off campus a few days before classes began, for $400 per week. But he wasn’t sure how long he’d have the room. The landlord, he said, was trying to sell the property.

    So while acclimating to campus life, an immensely stressful period for new students, Minnig wasn’t sure where he’d be living the following week.

    Students are frustrated. Some say they feel lied to — as though the university encouraged them to come to Santa Cruz even though there was nowhere for them to live.

    Yet many students understand the challenges. They don’t want the university to lower acceptance rates; that hurts access. They’re also worried about the environmental impacts of growth. And they’re trying to work with the city to bridge the divide.

    Zennon Ulyate-Crow is founding president of UC-Santa Cruz’s Student Housing Coalition. The group shares the city’s view that the university has a responsibility to house its students. But the coalition also believes that the city has a responsibility to provide for its constituents, including students.

    The group has practical goals: more housing, period. Multifamily housing, especially. More tenant protections, like rent control and eviction protections. And they want to get more students registered to vote in Santa Cruz County.

    “Both sides are pointing at one another to blame for this crisis,” Ulyate-Crow said of the university and the city. “And in the end, nothing happens because nobody takes responsibility.”

    Ulyate-Crow said the coalition has tried to forge a middle ground, but it’s been difficult. The group has even been met with resistance on campus when it has tried to partner with some student groups. There’s a “leftist purity test” that the coalition doesn’t meet when it endorses “imperfect” — in other words, market-rate — developments, Ulyate-Crow said.

    Zennon Ulyate-Crow, president of the UCSC Student Housing Coalition, at the Camper Park on campus at UC Santa Cruz.

    LiPo Ching for The Chronicle

    Zennon Ulyate-Crow, founder and president of UC-Santa Cruz’s Student Housing Coalition, in Camper Park. The 42 trailer units are the most affordable housing on campus.

    Santa Cruz — like San Francisco and many other cities in California — is markedly progressive when it comes to most social issues. “And yet it is also the city with some of the most extreme inequality and the greatest affordable housing crisis in the country,” said Greenberg, the sociology professor.

    As a planning commissioner for the city, Greenberg has seen firsthand how difficult it is to get homeowners to budge on legislation that could make housing more affordable. There’s a lack of political will, she said, to take steps to regulate the market and produce more affordable housing. Lobbyists from the real-estate industry, statewide and nationally, and local homeowners’ associations have blocked many proposed changes.

    The city has tried and failed many times over the past three decades to pass local rent control. (California passed a statewide rent-control law in 2019, becoming one of the first states to do so.) Measure N, which was on the ballot for Santa Cruz voters last November, would have taxed “empty homes” to raise funds for affordable housing. But it died after Santa Cruz Together, a grassroots political group that says it fights “radical” policies, raised $140,000 to campaign against the measure. The group received a $37,000 donation from the California Apartment Association.

    UC-Santa Cruz officials don’t want to be the villains in this story. But for now, they’re working within strict constraints.

    In 2022, the university enrolled 700 fewer students than in 2021, due to a lack of beds, marking the first time in years that the institution had reduced its number of acceptances. Officials said they’ll hold enrollment as steady as possible until more housing is available.

    That approach runs up against pressure from lawmakers and the UC system for campuses to enroll more California students amid soaring demand. The university received nearly 69,000 first-year applications for the fall of 2023, a record. Last year, UC-Santa Cruz admitted about 31,000 students and enrolled about 5,100.

    “When we enroll students to become Banana Slugs, we want them to come here and succeed,” said Hernandez-Jason, the university spokesman. “So we want to make sure that we have campus housing available, and that we feel like if they are not living in campus housing, that they’re going to be able to find some housing in the community.”

    New state funding specifically aimed at solving the housing crisis across California campuses will help subsidize some of the cost of developing more housing.

    The university’s most recent project — an expansion of Kresge Hall, which includes the construction of a new building — will create 600 new beds by the fall of 2025. Officials also plan to shift the roofline of the existing residence hall to add another floor. Of those new beds, 320 will be offered to undergraduates at 20-percent below the average campus housing rate.

    Keeley, the mayor, said the city’s politics are changing. In the most recent November election, he said, every voter he talked to wanted to see more housing. It used to be, he said, that about 70 percent of the electorate opposed development. Now, he estimated, about two-thirds of voters favor “appropriate development.”

    That development will take years.

    In the meantime, UC-Santa Cruz officials said they’re working to provide immediate aid to students who are struggling.

    “No UC-Santa Cruz student should be without a safe and reliable place to live,” Hernandez-Jason said.

    The Slug Support program offers a range of housing resources. If students find themselves suddenly without housing, they can get connected with a case manager who can get them placed in a local hotel or partner shelter. Students can also seek financial assistance with a housing deposit, look up tenant legal codes, and get legal help with housing issues.

    “What we’ll often see is a student comes in for housing assistance, but it turns out they can’t afford food either, and on top of that, maybe they’re failing their classes,” said Estefania Rodriguez, a basic-needs program manager at the university. “It’s a lot of everything.”

    The Redwood Free Market, which Rodriguez helps operate, is one of several free-food options across campus. These cafés, markets, and pop-up produce stands are operated largely by students. The food comes from local food banks, and some of the produce comes from the university’s garden.

    Students are continuing their advocacy, too, despite hitting some roadblocks. In January 2021, a group of them tried to open a shelter for students experiencing homelessness. They talked with community organizations, churches, and the university itself, to no avail.

    “Off-campus locations would tell us to search on campus for a location, and the university would tell us to look off campus,” said Guneet Hora, who was recently the co-president of Slug Shelter, as the group is called. “It was like a wild-goose chase.”

    The club has since pivoted to become a basic-needs service for students, focusing on food and clothing donations, as well as mutual aid.

    The Student Housing Coalition is advocating for the university to create a safe-parking program for students who live in their cars. Evan Morrison, a local resident who organized the city’s safe RV-parking program, has advised the coalition on its idea. (Scott-Hernandez said that a parking program “is not a viable short- or long-term solution for our housing challenges.“)

    Morrison is the founder of the Free Guide, a nonprofit that serves the general homelessness population in the city of Santa Cruz. Students largely don’t use the resources aimed at the city’s homeless population, Morrison said. Their needs are different.

    “There seems to be a good portion of students whose plan to end homelessness is to graduate,” he said. “So while they’re in school, they’re not trying to end their homelessness. That’s a different set of needs than the general homeless population.”

    The Redwood Grove apartments are surrounded by trees at UC Santa Cruz, in Santa Cruz, California, on Monday, January 23, 2023.

    LiPo Ching for The Chronicle

    The university is moving ahead with two housing projects. One will add 600 beds to an existing dorm. The other is a planned new complex that would house more than 3,000 students; it has faced lawsuits.

    While Morrison has no definitive data on how many students sleep in their cars, “my gut is if we had 30 parking spots, those would be full pretty darn quick,” he said.

    For much of the past year, Peyton Quijano was among them.

    During the toughest moments, she was comforted, at least in part, by the knowledge that she wasn’t alone.

    Then, a few weeks into the spring-2023 term, Quijano found a place to live — an off-campus apartment. She signed a lease that would go through the next academic year, when she’s scheduled to graduate.

    She and three roommates are splitting a one-bedroom apartment with a loft in downtown Santa Cruz. The rent is nearly $900 a month per person. It took some convincing for the landlords to rent to them, she said. Subletting would’ve been too complicated, so they’re paying rent for an empty apartment all summer.

    She considers herself one of the lucky ones.

    [ad_2]

    Carolyn Kuimelis

    Source link

  • This Simple 30-Minute Belonging Exercise Could Boost Student Retention

    This Simple 30-Minute Belonging Exercise Could Boost Student Retention

    [ad_1]

    Incoming college students who completed a 30-minute online exercise intended to bolster their sense of belonging were more likely to complete their first year of college while enrolled full time, according to a groundbreaking paper published in Science Thursday.

    The study involved 26,911 students at 22 diverse four-year institutions across the country, and it has the potential to help students at a variety of colleges, at little cost. Students in identity groups — based on race or ethnicity and first-generation college status — that have historically struggled more to complete the first year of college at any given institution benefitted the most from the exercise.

    The social-belonging intervention improved first-year retention among students in identity groups who reported feeling medium to high levels of belonging. For example, among students whose identity groups historically struggled to complete the first year of college and who also reported medium to high levels of belonging — the group that benefitted most from the activity — the exercise increased the proportion that completed their first year of college while enrolled full time from 57.2 percent to 59.3 percent.

    But for the 15 percent of students whose identity groups experienced low levels of belonging at their institutions, the exercise did not improve retention rates, indicating that colleges will have to work harder to help those students.

    Higher-education leaders have devoted more resources and attention to improving sense of belonging in recent years in an effort to help students from diverse backgrounds feel welcome on campus and to improve student success.

    Researchers have long known that college students’ sense of belonging is critically linked to outcomes such as persistence, engagement, and mental health. But it can be difficult to measure the specific impact of efforts to improve belonging in a college setting. More recent research has focused on what colleges can do to improve sense of belonging on campus.

    For the Science study, incoming first-year students in 2015 and 2016 spent up to half an hour in the summer before starting college completing an online module on belonging. They read about a survey of older students that showed many had experienced feeling homesick, having trouble finding a lab partner, or having difficulty interacting with professors, for example. The survey explained that those feelings are normal and can improve over time. Next, the students read curated stories from older students describing how such worries eventually got better. The incoming students were then asked to write about their reflections on the stories to help future students.

    The study, which has 37 authors, was conducted by the College Transition Collaborative, a partnership of researchers and practitioners who study ways to support belonging, growth, and equity in college settings. It’s now known as the Equity Accelerator.

    Gregory M. Walton, a professor of psychology at Stanford University and the lead author of the study, said the exercise works by giving students a hopeful map for the transition to college. For students who belong to groups that have struggled historically, the roadmap can provide a buffer when they hit inevitable bumps in their college career. While some students can more easily shrug off such challenges, students from underrepresented minority groups and first-generation college students are more likely to interpret them as evidence that they do not belong in college, which can negatively affect motivation and persistence. The intervention appears to provide a boost to students who have reflected on other students experiencing similar difficulties and getting through them.

    “The fact that it’s effective across these widely generalizable sample institutions is incredibly important,” Walton said. “Everybody should be doing this in some form.”

    Previous studies have shown similar interventions to be effective, but on a smaller scale. One such study found that an hourlong activity focused on struggles to fit in during the transition to college increased the grades of Black students over the next three years and reduced the gap in grade point averages between Black and white students by 52 percent.

    But by showing that the recent social-belonging intervention is effective at a variety of colleges across the country, including public and private colleges with admission rates ranging from 6 percent to 90 percent, the study demonstrates that such exercises are potentially scalable. The authors estimate that if the social-belonging activity were implemented at 749 four-year institutions across the United States that share key characteristics with the 22 colleges in the study, an additional 12,136 students, out of about one million new students, would complete their first year of college enrolled as full-time students.

    The social-belonging exercise is available for free to four-year colleges in the United States and Canada here.

    [ad_2]

    Adrienne Lu

    Source link

  • More College Students Are Choosing to Stop Drinking. Their Campuses Are Still Catching Up.

    More College Students Are Choosing to Stop Drinking. Their Campuses Are Still Catching Up.

    [ad_1]

    It was almost midnight on St. Patrick’s Day at the University of Michigan, and the party was in full swing. Inside, college students were stumbling and falling to the ground as the Killers’ “Mr. Brightside” pulsated through the room. A line ran out the door, filled with eager faces looking for a good time.

    No, this wasn’t a fraternity mixer. This was Sober Skate.

    And people weren’t falling onto a sticky wood floor, but a skating rink at the Yost Ice Arena. The event was so popular that within the first 30 minutes, the rental desk had already leased 300 of its 350 pairs of skates. The 45 large pizzas that organizers ordered were gone in an hour, as were the cases of Faygo and Diet Coke.

    Each year around St. Patrick’s Day, Sober Skate — co-hosted by Michigan’s Collegiate Recovery Program and the Washtenaw Recovery Advocacy Project — offers local college students and community members a dry alternative to the holiday’s liquor-soaked festivities. Not all attendees identify as sober, but they’ve all chosen to abstain from alcohol on one of the highest-risk drinking nights of the year.

    “Hundreds of people come out,” said Matthew Statman, manager of the recovery program, which supports students healing from substance-use issues. “And most of them are just young people who are not interested in drinking green beer.”

    This year’s Sober Skate was the most popular yet. Statman said he is always surprised by how many students “come out of the woodwork” to attend the program’s substance-free events.

    Emily Elconin for The Chronicle

    A sober skating event hosted by the Collegiate Recovery Program at Yost Ice Arena in Ann Arbor, Mich.

    “They’re everywhere,” Statman said. “Most students are not using substances heavily or frequently, but they’re just in the libraries and in the dorms. And you wouldn’t see them otherwise.”

    For as long as the modern campus has existed — as long as films like Animal House and She’s the Man have primed expectations for campus life — administrators have tried to curb dangerous drinking. While students’ participation in drinking has fallen in the past 40 years, high-risk binge drinking has remained a stubborn problem.

    Yet recently, there’s been a shift in many students’ attitudes toward drinking. Instead of seeing alcohol as a fact of college life, more students are questioning its presence in their lives. Many are deciding they don’t want it to be in their lives — or at least not as much.

    Drinking remains widespread on campuses, and other substances are only becoming more popular. Still, students who choose sobriety are facing less social shame and judgment than in years past.

    That’s great news for administrators who have long worked toward this end. But now they must figure out how to help students lead fulfilling social lives without alcohol — a substance which, like it or not, is entangled with many colleges’ bottom lines.

    The sober movement’s roots formed long ago. It might not feel like it, but student drinking has been on a downward turn for the last four decades.

    In 1981, 82 percent of students reported drinking in the previous 30 days. In 2021, that figure was less than 60 percent. The data come from the National Institute on Drug Abuse’s Monitoring the Future survey, which experts say is a reliable measure of students’ alcohol consumption. Students’ participation in drinking trended downward until about 1997 and has continued to decline slightly since then.

    About 44 percent of students in 1981 self-reported binge drinking in the previous two weeks, according to the survey. In 2020, when many college students were home because of the pandemic, the binge-drinking rate fell to 24 percent, but it bounced back to 30 percent in 2021. Binge drinking is defined as having five or more drinks in one sitting.

    Duncan B. Clark, a psychiatry professor at the University of Pittsburgh and an expert on adolescent substance use, said there was a significant drop in alcohol use in the 1980s after Congress made 21 the minimum drinking age. Since then, “a lot of the rates have been fairly stable,” he said.

    The data, though, don’t tell the full story about campus culture. Alcohol has vexed college administrators, even as drinking rates have declined. In the 1980s and 1990s, The Chronicle reported on spates of alcohol-related student deaths, efforts to reform fraternity drinking culture, and the difficulties of establishing sound alcohol policies. We’re still writing about those topics.

    “Seven years after most states increased the legal drinking age to 21, college officials are still wrestling with how to respond,” The Chronicle declared in 1990. “Some are trying to stamp out underage drinking on their campuses, while others say a more realistic approach is to acknowledge that students use alcohol and to encourage them not to abuse it.”

    Over the past 40 years, colleges have poured millions of dollars into alcohol-education programs, health-promotion centers, and collegiate-recovery communities. They’ve invested time and money into hiring staff to oversee these efforts.

    These interventions have worked to an extent. Recovery programs continue to pop up all over the country to support students healing from substance-use issues. At the same time, alcohol-education programs are a mixed bag, with the benefits wearing off over time.

    And while binge-drinking behavior has slowed, it remains a major concern of college leaders, who fear that students will die from alcohol poisoning. Each death brings renewed calls for institutions to crack down on alcohol culture and hold the groups that cultivate it accountable.

    These administrators may be relieved to learn, then, that there’s a nascent movement of college students turning down the red Solo cup.

    While young people have many personal reasons for making the choice, confluent forces — a more inclusive society, a stronger safety net for those struggling with addiction, and increased skepticism toward alcohol — have made it easier than ever to be a college student who doesn’t drink.

    Students converse as they lace up their skates during a sober skating event

    Emily Elconin for The Chronicle

    Students converse as they lace up their skates during a sober skating event

    That cuts against the conventional campus wisdom that students who abstain are just alcoholics. The substance-free community is made up of people with various reasons for not using alcohol and drugs, said Lindsay Garcia, who oversees Brown University’s Donovan Program for Recovery and Substance-Free Initiatives.

    “Some people just want to study really hard,” Garcia said. “Some people have family history of addiction; some people are in recovery. People have religious reasons or personal reasons or medical reasons.”

    Society has, in recent years, become more willing to embrace and organize around the sober lifestyle, Clark, of the University of Pittsburgh, said. He pointed to Dry January, a popular health campaign that encourages people to take a break from drinking in the new year.

    More bars are offering “mocktails,” or nonalcoholic cocktails. Headlines declare that alcohol just isn’t cool anymore. The “sober curious” movement has spawned a cottage industry of podcasts, books, and social groups designed to uplift people who are questioning their relationship with alcohol.

    People are also more attuned to the research on the negative health effects of alcohol, said Lynsey Romo, an associate professor of communications at North Carolina State University who studies how people talk about alcoholism and sobriety.

    “All of a sudden, everything is ‘sober curious,’” Romo said. “Every single news outlet is writing about this.”

    On campus, demographic shifts may be amplifying the sober wave.

    Students today are more diverse, and research shows that students of color and first-generation students are less likely to drink excessively. Today’s college students are also more open-minded toward people who are different from them, and that’s reflected in the greater acceptance of those who choose not to drink.

    Sonia Redwine, director of the Recovery and Intervention Support and Education Center at the University of North Texas, said lockdown allowed many students to think seriously about their behaviors.

    “A lot of students coming in are really seeking to align with their values, seeking activities that allow them to grow,” she said. “This incoming student population is reflecting a lot more about that, and there’s a lot more awareness of the adverse effects of alcohol and consequences.”

    One of the largest shifts in higher education over the past 20 years has been the increasing pressure on colleges to offer full services to their students. Many students today arrive on campus with the expectation that their institution provides not only academics, housing, and food, but also medical care, security services, and mental-health support.

    In that vein, collegiate-recovery programs have sprouted across the United States. They offer sober housing, social events, and connections to community services. According to its website, the Association of Recovery in Higher Education has 152 member institutions worldwide.

    At Michigan, most of the recovery program’s events are only for students in the close-knit group. But in addition to St. Patrick’s Day skating, the program hosts an annual sober tailgate, which is open to the public. For students who don’t enjoy drinking or partying, events like these prove that they’re not alone.

    “I don’t really like parties,” said Wencke Groeneveld, a Michigan student who attended Sober Skate. “I prefer physical activity, and I am a big fan of ice-skating. Even when I go to parties, I don’t drink. But it’s a little bit weird because other people are drinking.”

    And for students who do enjoy going out, the prospect of free pizza and ice-skating may be enough to lure them away from the party scene.

    “Without alternatives like this, people will just get drunk,” said Maya Castleberry, a Michigan graduate who attended the event. “There’s a huge turnout. People see that ice-skating is more fun than drinking.”

    Recovery programs only serve a subset of students who abstain, and those students’ needs are different. But just the presence of a collegiate-recovery program on campus helps normalize the experience of being a college student who doesn’t drink, Statman said.

    Matt Statman, manager of the Collegiate Recovery Program at the University of Michigan

    Emily Elconin for The Chronicle

    Matt Statman, manager of the Collegiate Recovery Program at the University of Michigan

    “Campuses that really are invested in collegiate recovery and raise up students in recovery do something to help normalize sober students, whether they’re in recovery or not, or need to be in recovery or not,” Statman said.

    Some campuses have student-run clubs that host alcohol- and drug-free activities, like Bucknell University’s C.A.L.V.I.N. & H.O.B.B.E.S. and Brown University’s SoBear.

    Madhu Subramanian, a senior at Brown and president of SoBear, said that while club events are designed for people who are substance-free, it is not a requirement.

    “You just have to remain sober right before, and during,” Subramanian said. “I think we provide a really good avenue for people who, for whatever reason, might just want a space that doesn’t have substances for a night.”

    SoBear’s spring 2023 schedule includes bookmark weaving and tote-bag decorating. Events typically draw between 20 and 30 students, Subramanian said. Once, a mocktail-and-movie night attracted 180 people. “Last week we created potted felt succulents,” he said. “Last semester we went to Dave & Buster’s.”

    Sober students at Brown gather in several different ways, including through substance-free housing.

    Requests to live in first-year substance-free housing have tripled since the beginning of the pandemic, Garcia said. When she assumed the position, in January 2021, participation in the collegiate-recovery program had dwindled to three or four active members. Now, it’s between 30 and 40.

    Subramanian lives in Donovan House, a 17-bed residence for sober students.

    “Everyone in the house is there for different reasons, but all of us completely respect each other’s reasons for not wanting to interact with substances,” he said.

    Naturally, many teetotaling college students find community, and a following, on social media. On TikTok, student creators post videos sharing reasons why they choose not to drink, tips for staying sober, and mocktail recipes.

    “I wanted to create a space and awareness that binge-drinking culture is not required to have a good college experience,” said Julie Lawton, a sophomore at the University of Connecticut who runs a health-and-fitness TikTok account.

    Natalie Christian, a recovery support assistant and graduate of the University of Michigan

    Emily Elconin for The Chronicle

    Natalie Christian, a recovery-support assistant and graduate of the University of Michigan

    Lawton said social media helps people who choose not to drink feel less lonely.

    “If people didn’t have social media, they’d look around in college and think everyone’s drinking,” she said. “The only reason people know that I don’t drink is because of my social media.”

    When Lawton started college, she noticed how normalized drinking was at Connecticut. There wasn’t much to do in Storrs, she said, besides drink and party.

    So she’d drink, but it didn’t make her feel good. Lawton said she’d get really bad “hangxiety,” which she defined as the anxiety one feels the morning after drinking, when you can’t remember who you talked to or what you said.

    At the beginning of her sophomore year, Lawton decided to try going out sober. She didn’t tell anyone and made sure to have a nonalcoholic drink in her hand. “I felt like I had a lot more confidence sober,” she said.

    But the frat parties aren’t clearing out just yet.

    While sober students have found support and community, they still struggle to navigate their peers’ expectations around drinking.

    “I am comfortable talking about it,” said Claire Fogarty, a junior at the University of Southern California, of her sobriety. “People don’t know my relationship with it. But it isn’t something you’re supposed to ask people about.”

    Colleges are still playing catch-up on creating better sober spaces that work for students. Campus-sponsored events often end before the weekend-night revelry even begins.

    “The administration can only do so much when it comes to student culture, because that’s something that takes years to change,” said Kacey Lee, a sophomore at Cornell University. “But I do wish they would implement night events or concerts or open-mic nights, low-key things at night so that there’s things for students to do without alcohol.”

    Not having alternatives is especially difficult for students in recovery, who often have to choose between going out sober and staying in.

    “College is not a recovery-enhancing environment,” said Katie Carroll, a Michigan senior and member of its Collegiate Recovery Program. “I’d love to say it’s as common to find sober activities as it is ones where drinking is involved, but it isn’t.”

    At Michigan, part of the success of the skating event was that it was so late, running from 10 p.m. to midnight. When asked what their plans were for the rest of the night, most attendees said they would go to bed.

    “I’ve come to college to study and get a degree, so it’s better that there’s an event that doesn’t involve alcohol,” said Pranav Varshney, a Michigan freshman. Ice-skating is “not going to make me feel bad the next day, and I can go back to studying.”

    Hosting better substance-free events is one thing; changing attitudes and behavior around drinking is another.

    Alcohol consumption is so entrenched in the public imagination of college life that its absence is newsworthy; we question why students do not drink, not why they do. And the functioning of the college relies, financially and otherwise, on the assumption that students will drink.

    Institutions attract students by promising both academic and social nourishment, but the responsibility of engaging students often falls to Greek-life organizations and other student clubs where booze reigns supreme. Colleges reap the benefits: In 2021, a Gallup poll commissioned by the National Panhellenic Conference and the North American Interfraternity Council found that fraternity and sorority members were much more likely to report donating to their alma mater than unaffiliated alumni — 54 percent versus 10 percent. Former fraternity and sorority members were also more likely than unaffiliated alumni to recommend their institution to others.

    These groups remain embroiled in alcohol-related hazing scandals. About 1,500 college students between 18 and 24 die from alcohol-related causes each year, according to the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism.

    Plus, alcohol is more widely available on campuses than ever. More colleges are allowing beer and wine sales at football games. Several have tightened their embrace of beer companies through sponsorships and branded beer.

    “Although alcohol use has decreased over time, it still remains — by far — the most prevalent substance used on college campuses,” said Megan Patrick, a research professor at the University of Michigan and principal investigator on the Monitoring the Future study, in an email to The Chronicle.

    And a recent TikTok trend that recommends mixing water, liquor, flavoring, and electrolytes in a gallon jug is a new stressor for administrators. Advocates of the borg (“blackout rage gallon”) argue that the concoction reduces harm, because drinkers control what goes in their jug. That’s not so reassuring to colleges.

    A mostly-full plastic gallon jug is seen with a red liquid inside. Written in marker on one face of the jug are the words “Mike’s Borg.”

    Photo by Michael Theis, The Chronicle

    A borg — “blackout rage gallon” — is a cocktail of spirits such as vodka, Kool-Aid, and electrolyte solutions drank from a repurposed gallon jug.

    In March, during the annual “Blarney Blowout” binge-drinking event, the University of Massachusetts at Amherst and the Town of Amherst released a joint statement alerting the community to the use of borgs. The Amherst Fire Department received 28 requests for ambulance transport during the event. Officials planned to “assess this weekend’s developments and consider steps to improve alcohol education and intervention.”

    Marijuana use, meanwhile, has been rising steadily since the mid-aughts. In 2021, 24 percent of college students said they had used marijuana in the last month, according to Monitoring the Future data.

    Statman, at the University of Michigan, said he has noticed an uptick in cannabis use as Michigan has legalized recreational use and dispensaries have opened within walking distance of campus.

    “That’s affected the culture for sure around substance use,” he said. He said he didn’t have the numbers, but “I think it’s safe to say that more people are using cannabis than they were before you could go buy it at the store.”

    There’s reason to be optimistic, though, about the trajectory of alcohol-free life on campus.

    “All the positive trends that we’re seeing point to a safer campus in terms of alcohol use,” said Julia Martinez, an expert on college drinking and an associate professor of psychology at Colgate University.

    Clark, the Pitt psychiatrist, said he welcomes the greater acceptance of sobriety on campus and the shift toward a more expansive definition of college fun.

    “What is fairly ingrained in our culture is that being a college student is associated with alcohol and other drugs,” Clark said. “That’s proven to be a problematic expectation.”

    Instead of embracing these expectations, college students today are charting their own paths.

    Students at a sober skating event

    Emily Elconin for The Chronicle

    Students at a sober skating event

    “People talk about this current generation like they don’t take on any risks,” Martinez said. “I would really want to emphasize that younger people are putting their foot down and are saying, ‘We don’t have to do the status quo.’”

    In the lobby as the Michigan event waned, Bella Nuce, who graduated in 2021, reflected on the four years she has attended Sober Skate. When the 25-year-old first started going, it was much smaller, mostly fellow students in recovery. Now, it’s everyone.

    She credited “a younger generation that’s more mature than me” for increasing Sober Skate’s popularity.

    Meanwhile on the ice, Justine Sedky, who earned her master’s from Michigan in 2020, danced in anticipation of midnight. At that time, she would celebrate her fifth sober anniversary. Her peers whooped as the minutes counted down.

    Of course, there would be no clinking of glasses when the clock struck midnight. Statman, the recovery-program manager, made just one request, tongue in cheek, as Sedky’s big moment approached: “Don’t drink.”

    [ad_2]

    Kate Hidalgo Bellows

    Source link

  • What Does a Healthy Campus Actually Look Like? A New Study Offers Ideas.

    What Does a Healthy Campus Actually Look Like? A New Study Offers Ideas.

    [ad_1]

    Small campus interventions — like adding hydration stations and making healthy foods more visible — can make a big difference in how students, faculty, and staff feel about well-being at their college, according to a new study.

    Conducted at the University of California at Riverside, the study examined how health factors into university policy and how health-promotion programs contribute to campus culture. UC-Riverside is part of the Healthy Campus Network, an alliance of the UC system’s 10 institutions that’s focused on improving physical and mental health on each campus.

    Eighteen focus groups of UC-Riverside students, faculty, and staff participated in the study in 2018, 2019, and 2020. As part of the research, Healthy Campus created some new health interventions and sought to raise awareness of existing efforts.

    Participants were increasingly aware of health-promotion efforts on campus as the study progressed, according to the focus groups. In the last two years of the study, participants talked more about broader, institution-wide health policies, rather than specific programs.

    Faculty and staff reported feeling left out of campus health services, researchers said. They could name many resources available to students, like the food pantry and recreation center, but they were unaware of what was available to employees. Those perceptions improved by the end of the study.

    “There was this lack of, I would say, care about this other population of communities that exist on campus,” said Evelyn Vázquez, one of the authors of the paper. Vázquez is an assistant researcher in the department of social medicine, population, and public health at UC-Riverside’s School of Medicine.

    Julie Chobdee, another one of the authors, said the infrastructure built as a part of the Healthy Campus project made them a hub for faculty and staff wellness on campus. Chobdee is now associate director of the employee health and well-being program at the University of Southern California’s WorkWell Center.

    Additionally, first-generation students were sharing their increased knowledge of health services with their families, helping them to access mental-health care and more, Vázquez said.

    The study also found that small environmental changes, like refurbishing stairwells and putting up nonsmoking signage, improved people’s perceptions of how committed their university was to health promotion.

    One staff member praised stairwell improvements like better lighting and fresh paint, as well as signs encouraging people to take the stairs instead of the elevator. And even if someone needed to take the elevator on a given day, the staff member said, there were posters offering brief instructions on deep breathing.

    Two staff members said their offices had added wellness activities into their training programs, citing that integration as evidence of a top-down commitment to better health. Walking meetings were also identified as a positive step.

    Seeing campus leaders participate in health-promotion activities demonstrated that well-being was a genuine priority for the university, according to those interviewed.

    Faculty members, meanwhile, could help students by doing something as simple as providing a link to mental-health services, said Ann Marie Cheney, another author of the paper and lead designer of the study.

    Cheney, an associate professor in the department of social medicine, population, and public health at Riverside’s medical school, said her research made clear that students viewed faculty as access points for other services on campus, even if faculty did not consider the well-being of students as part of their role.

    Cheney and Chobdee were formerly co-leaders of Healthy Campus at UC-Riverside, which involved nine subcommittees of students, faculty, and staff, overseen by a large advisory board. Chobdee hopes to build a similar program in her role at USC. Cheney and Vázquez have both transitioned out of the project.

    Despite the positive findings from the study, Healthy Campus is in a period of flux, Cheney said. UC leaders have not been able to find a new crop of people who have a strong vision for the project and can bring together campus stakeholders, she said.

    Cheney said more investment from university leadership would have helped the team plan a sustainable future. When she was involved, it was volunteer work, she said. She hopes the study can “spark a light” and garner more attention from the university’s administration.

    Overall, the study shows that empowerment is key to creating a healthy campus community, Cheney said.

    “Why I think Healthy Campus was so successful at our university is because we identified grass-roots leaders who were interested in creating healthier environments, and we supported their ideas,” she said.

    [ad_2]

    Kate Marijolovic

    Source link

  • This Professor Joined a Sorority. Now She’s Written a Book About the Enduring Appeal of Greek Life.

    This Professor Joined a Sorority. Now She’s Written a Book About the Enduring Appeal of Greek Life.

    [ad_1]

    When Jana Mathews became an assistant professor of English at Rollins College, she initially struggled to connect with her students. As a specialist in medieval literature, which wasn’t the most popular subject on campus, Mathews figured she’d need to make extra effort to develop a recruitment pipeline and ensure that students took her classes.

    So she did something unconventional: She joined a sorority.

    “It was totally bizarre,” Mathews said. She had grown up as a devout Mormon and attended Brigham Young University as an undergraduate, so she knew next to nothing about Greek life.

    Mathews fully embraced the sorority-rush process, participating in new-member rituals and forging a close bond with her “big.” Between 2011 and 2018, she served as a faculty adviser for two sororities and a fraternity at Rollins.

    Mathews connected with students in ways she could never have imagined. As a chapter adviser, she built such a high level of trust with the students that some would show up on her doorstep when they were in crisis.

    Now Mathews has written a book: The Benefits of Friends: Inside the Complicated World of Today’s Sororities and Fraternities (University of North Carolina Press, 2022). It’s a study of the close same-sex friendships that are a central part of sorority and fraternity membership.

    Mathews didn’t want to make an argument for whether to abolish Greek-life organizations, as some have recently called for. She instead dove deeply into how fraternity and sorority relationships can uplift students while also perpetuating harm — with the goal of prompting a more informed conversation about the future of the groups.

    Mathews, now a full professor at Rollins, spoke recently with The Chronicle about how powerful friendships contribute to the enduring appeal of fraternities and sororities, how those relationships influence campus social life, and whether the benefits of Greek life outweigh the downsides. This interview has been edited for length and clarity.

    Why is this kind of a study important for understanding Greek life?

    We tend to think of white fraternities and sororities as kind of R-rated Boy and Girl Scout troops — that their influence on individual lives and broader culture begins and ends on the college campus. And actually what I hope to show is that these organizations are powerful social influencers that impact the way we think about foundational relationships and what it means to be a friend. What does a family look like? How should I treat my brother and sister? What does it mean to call someone who’s not related to me a brother or a sister?

    The other thing that interested me was the unsatisfactory answer that I kept getting to the big question that we always ask about these organizations: Should they stay or should they go? We have to understand first: What do they do? Why are they so pervasive in popular culture, in the face of such enduring controversy? And how do they operate? Once we get at those questions, then I think we’re better prepared to engage in a nuanced conversation about whether they should stay or go. And more importantly, we have some of the tools that can equip us to act on some of those ideas.

    When you first began interacting with Greek life at Rollins, what notions about the organizations did you have? How did that change over time?

    My exposure was about what a person who was from another country might have. I had seen Legally Blonde, and I knew they lived in houses, and I knew all the stereotypes about them being big drinkers and partiers. That was the extent.

    But they populated my classes. At the time, 35 percent of Rollins’s student body was part of the Greek life system. I teach medieval literature, which doesn’t exactly appeal to the masses. I was really yearning for ways to connect with my students. The common denominator that linked many of them together was their fraternity and sorority experience.

    As I went through the initiation process and the shadowing process and then serving as their adviser, I learned that these organizations are really critical to the lives and happiness of many of these students, but are also a source of tremendous angst and anxiety and tension and heartbreak.

    Greek-life organizations have long been a venue for intimate friendships. Is there something distinct about the kinds of bonds that are being formed today?

    Same-sex platonic relationships have always been critically important. They were formative in the frontier era of our nation’s founding, and they date back to Greek and Roman mythology — this is nothing new.

    What’s changing is the fact that women and men are staying single for longer periods than they were in the past. People are getting married later and living longer. At critical stages of their life — in their 20s and 30s, and also the end of life — people are single. Those bonds become really critical in understanding the composition of society at large. Platonic friends mean more than they did in the past.

    Fraternity men told you that they engineer a gender imbalance at their parties. The result is hookup culture. Is that problematic?

    We have more women going to college than men. That’s not going to be reversing itself anytime soon. Men are finding ways to capitalize on that and pursue their romantic interests, and heterosexual women are put in a position where they have to combat that. Fraternities and sororities will call themselves lots of different things, but they’re primarily social clubs. Part of the social experience if you’re a college student is romance and dating and sex. These groups inherently play a critical role in how that culture operates on a college campus. It’s neither good nor bad.

    But what has been underappreciated to this point is the ways in which the sex-ratio imbalance on college campuses works to foster a hookup culture, and then how, in turn, women are working against that — how they’re trying to hold their own.

    When I talked to women and men, men were much more ready to admit what exactly they were doing. “We are creating a scenario where there are fewer men than women.” Women were not as conscious about what they were doing. I would say: If you look around, what do you notice about the demographics? It would take several steps for them to say: There are twice as many of us as men. Then they would articulate what they were doing in response. It was less strategic.

    When they did figure it out — what sororities absolutely do is negotiate and build teams that can help their own members compete and try to get teams of guys. The way to do that is to block other sororities out.

    Another dynamic you explored was the role of LGBTQ members in facilitating connections between straight men and women. Can you talk about that?

    Homophobia is still rife within the college environment and in society at large. But what we are seeing is that more chapters are seeing LGBTQ students as assets. Fraternities see them not as threats to their masculinity, but as partners. Some gay men affectionately refer to themselves as the hot girls’ best friends. They have this gaggle of girls that they’re all really good friends with, but they’re not romantic competitors to fraternity men.

    For the gay member, it enables him to gain access to this space and this group of male friends. On the surface, it’s a wonderful thing. The dark side of it is, fraternities are putting LGBTQ members in a position where they’re asking them to bring in women and that serves as their primary purpose. The level of self acceptance is conditional; there’s no reciprocity. You could never bring a gay date to a dance, or bring a man home into the fraternity house, or publicly display any kind of affection.

    You talked about how close fraternity or sorority friendships influence what happens after an alleged sexual assault. You wrote, “When things do go slightly or horribly awry, the metaphor of family becomes even more dysfunctional than it already is.” What did you mean by that?

    When a sexual assault occurs, often the only people to know in the beginning are the sorority woman’s friends. The reason I found that they were reluctant to report or do anything about it was because their experience with Title IX and the legal system, from watching it happen to other friends, didn’t bring about the resolution they wanted. They believed going in that there would be no apologies, only excuses.

    So instead of blaming the person who committed the harm or anyone else, they often turned on their friends. They blamed their friends for not protecting them, for letting them drink too much, for leaving them alone. That sounds really problematic, and it is. But they did that out of self protection. They knew that they could pass blame onto their friends, and that they were going to get an apology. They knew that at the end of that exchange, that friend was going to hug them and tend to their needs — that there was going to be this resolution.

    There has been increasing scrutiny of sexual assault in fraternities. Is there something inherent about Greek-life organizations that creates that culture? Or is it just one manifestation of a broader culture?

    To put every fraternity chapter in the same category and say that they all promote rape culture is a gross exaggeration. But that’s the perception of the culture, broadly defined, and the fraternity and sorority community has not taken that seriously. So they’re holding the line again and again, saying, “This is just a few bad apples,” and in doing so are missing opportunities to have an important conversation about sex — one we should also be having in society at large.

    Having worked with a fraternity comprised of wonderful gentlemen — they are spectacular on a one-on-one basis. When you put them in a group, they often don’t bring out the best in one another. I would say the same of sorority women. Part of that is a developmental issue. Fraternity men, from what I observed, are a bunch of 18- to 22-year-olds who are posturing and trying to figure out who they are, so they lean into the easiest, most dominant version of who they think they should be, and that is often a crude, sexist jerk. Sororities do that too; they can be catty, nasty, and mean. I’m not excusing the behavior, but part of it is caused by the sheer number of young people who are together with no different perspectives or experiences to check them.

    Do the benefits of Greek life outweigh the problems?

    If you think about higher ed across the globe, every other country is able to function without sororities and fraternities. The idea that we need them, that it’s an essential part of our educational identity, feels problematic. There are other ways you can accrue the same benefits without being part of a fraternity or sorority.

    But maybe, arguably, the biggest benefit that fraternities and sororities provide is that they provide scapegoats for colleges. We like to say that all of the bad behavior — the misogyny, the racism — is concentrated in these little pockets, and it’s only a small percent of our population that says and does these horrible things. We have to know that that’s not true. Fraternities and sororities provide convenient ways for colleges to not have to deal with the pervasive issues that affect all campuses and all populations.

    [ad_2]

    Sarah Brown

    Source link