TOPLINE:

The availability of medical cannabis has little effect on prescription rates of opioids, nonopioid pain medicines, and other pain interventions, according to anew studypublished inAnnals of Internal Medicine.

Effects of U.S. State Medical Cannabis Laws on Treatment of Chronic Noncancer Pain

METHODOLOGY:

  • Cannabis advocates suggest that legal medical cannabis can be a partial solution to the opioid overdose crisis in the United States, which claimed more than 80,000 lives in 2021.
  • Current research on how legalized cannabis reduces dependence on prescription pain medication is inconclusive.
  • Researchers examined insurance data for the period 2010 to 2022 from 583,820 adults with chronic noncancer pain.
  • They drew from 12 states in which medical cannabis is legal and from 17 in which it is not legal to create a hypothetical randomized trial. The control group simulated prescription rates where medical cannabis was not available.
  • Authors evaluated prescription rates for opioids, nonopioid painkillers, and pain interventions, such as physical therapy.

TAKEAWAY:

In a given month during the first 3 years after legalization, for states withmedical cannabis, the investigators found the following:

  • There was an average decrease of 1.07 percentage points in the proportion of patients who received any opioid prescription, compared to a 1.12 percentage point decrease in the control group.
  • There was an average increase of 1.14 percentage points in the proportion of patients who received any nonopioid prescription painkiller, compared to a 1.19 percentage point increase in the control group.
  • There was a 0.17 percentage point decrease in the proportion of patients who received any pain procedure, compared to a 0.001 percentage point decrease in the control group.

IN PRACTICE:

“This study did not identify important effects of medical cannabis laws on receipt of opioid or nonopioid pain treatment among patients with chronic noncancer pain,” according to the researchers.

SOURCE:

Thestudywas led by Emma E. McGinty, PhD, of Weill Cornell Medicine, and was funded by the National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA).

LIMITATIONS:

The investigators used a simulated, hypothetical control group that was based on untestable assumptions. They also drew data solely from insured individuals, so the study does not necessarily represent uninsured populations.

DISCLOSURES:

McGinty reports receiving a grant from the National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA). White, Stuart, McCourt, Seewald, and Tormohlen report support from NIDA. Bicket reports support from the National Institute of Health (NIH). Rutkow reports support from NIDA and NIH.

https://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/993993

Sean Hocking

Source link

You May Also Like

New Zealand reclassifies low-dose CBD

Medsafe has taken a step towards easier access to one medicinal cannabis…

Tip For Putting Dating In A Different Light

Let’s be honest. The whole dating process sucks. Unless you’re a very…

Kleinfeld Kaplan & Becker LLP Announces Election of Samantha N. Hong as Partner – Medical Marijuana Program Connection

WASHINGTON–(BUSINESS WIRE)–Kleinfeld Kaplan & Becker LLP (KKB) is pleased to announce that…

ABC News Australia: Australia is about to legalise MDMA and psilocybin for medicinal use. So how will it work?

ABC news has this detailed report giving some background on who, how,…