LEFT BIAS

These media sources are moderately to strongly biased toward liberal causes through story selection and/or political affiliation.  They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports, and omit information reporting that may damage liberal causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy. See all Left Bias sources.

  • Overall, we rate the Movement Advancement Project (MAP) as left-biased due to its clear advocacy for LGBTQ rights, aligning with left-leaning social justice positions. We rate its content as mostly factual rather than high, mainly due to its advocacy-driven approach, which may leave out important context.

Bias Rating: LEFT
Factual Reporting: MOSTLY FACTUAL
Country: USA
MBFC’s Country Freedom Rating: MOSTLY FREE
Media Type: Organization/Foundation
Traffic/Popularity: Minimal Traffic

MBFC Credibility Rating: MEDIUM CREDIBILITY
Source: https://www.mapresearch.org/

Read Detailed Report


Do you appreciate our work? Please consider one of the following ways to sustain us.

MBFC Ad-Free 

or

MBFC Donation






Left vs. Right Bias: How we rate the bias of media sources

Found this insightful? Please consider sharing on your Social Media:

Subscribe With Email

Join 23K other subscribers

Be the first to comment on “Daily Source Bias Check: Movement Advancement Project”

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.