Listen to this article

A court ruling may have thrown a wrench into the $4 billion plan to develop a casino resort on the Nassau Coliseum property in Uniondale. 

In the decision made Thursday, State Supreme Court Justice Sarika Kapoor voided the property’s lease agreement between Las Vegas Sands and Nassau County in a lawsuit brought by Hofstra University. 

Kapoor ruled that Nassau County’s Planning Commission had violated the state’s Open Meetings Law by not providing a proper public hearing on the lease transfer and failed to give a “hard look” when considering the project’s environmental impact. She ordered that the Planning Commission’s April 27 recommendation to approve the lease transfer to Sands be annulled. 

Kapoor kicked the matter backed to the Planning Commission and the Nassau Legislature “to conduct a proper public hearing” and ordered the county to issue a positive SEQRA declaration in preparation of a new environmental impact statement on the proposed development. 

“We appreciate the court’s thoughtful ruling and the court’s granting of reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs to Hofstra incurred in connection with several of the claims,” Hofstra President Susan Poser said in a written statement. “The court recognized the public’s right to participate in decision-making about the current redevelopment plan for the Nassau Hub. We look forward to contributing to the planning process and advocating for the use of the Hub in ways that will best contribute to our thriving community, while protecting against environmental and other harms.” 

Hofstra has long opposed having a casino on property adjacent to its campus. The university filed the Article 78 lawsuit on April 18 issuing a statement that alleged the county Planning Commission “failed to properly notice and conduct its meetings for consideration of the transfer of the lease for the Nassau Hub and surrounding public property from its current leaseholder to Las Vegas Sands for the development of a casino.” 

Las Vegas Sands has already spent millions in preparation for its proposed development, including a $54 million payment to the county, $241 million to Nassau Live Center LLC the former leaseholder to the Coliseum property, and millions more in its lobbying effort to secure a casino license from the state. The license bid from Sands is among several proposals seeking one of the three downstate casino licenses the state will be awarding. 

If the state does grant Sands a casino license, Nassau will get $25 million of the state Gaming Commission’s minimum $500 million license fee. In addition, the county will get a $5 million annual rent payment for the Coliseum property, which increases to $10 million upon the start of casino operations or the three-year anniversary of the casino license award. The lease agreement had mandated that Sands contribute $2 million a year for a Community Benefits Program, which later increases to $4 million annually. 

Sands has said the project will go forward as a mixed-use complex without gaming if the sought-after license isn’t awarded. In fact, the now voided 99-year lease agreement stipulates that a non-casino development must include up to 500 units of housing, a 5-star hotel and an entertainment venue with at least 3,600 seats.  

David Winzelberg

Source link

You May Also Like

Generative AI: A pragmatic blueprint for data security

Head over to our on-demand library to view sessions from VB Transform…

Movie extras worry they’ll be replaced by AI. Hollywood is already doing body scans

While working as a background actor on the the Disney+ series WandaVision,…

Israel strikes dense Gaza camp, says it kills Hamas commander By Reuters

© Reuters. Smoke billows after rockets were launched from the Gaza Strip…

Learn ASL with This Bundle, Just $40 Through March 24 | Entrepreneur

Disclosure: Our goal is to feature products and services that we think…