ReportWire

Category: Sports

Sports News | ReportWire publishes the latest breaking U.S. and world news, trending topics and developing stories from around globe.

  • Rivals.com  –  East Coast Spotlight: Recruiting Rumor Mill

    Rivals.com – East Coast Spotlight: Recruiting Rumor Mill

    [ad_1]

    There is a mountain of big news heading into the busy month of June around the country. The East region is no exception. Rivals national recruiting analyst Adam Friedman has the latest in this edition of the rumor mill.

    Iheanacho’s recruitment is still in the early stages but some teams have already made a strong impression. Georgia, Penn State, Tennessee, Alabama and Texas are just some of the teams that have caught his eye thus far.

    Iheanacho has lots of time to do his research and get to know the coaches at these schools but he’s already built a good relationship with Penn State offensive line coach Phil Trautwein, Alabama offensive line coach Chris Kapilovic and Oregon offensive line coach A’lique Terry.

    There will be plenty of visits ahead for Iheanacho but one school he’d like to see in the near future is Tennessee.

    *****

    Georgia hosted Gilchrist for an unofficial visit earlier this month and he really enjoyed the environment in Athens. He got to spend time with the coaches and liked getting to know them more. The Bulldogs are just one of his final seven schools along with Alabama, South Carolina, Maryland, Virginia, Virginia Tech and Penn State.

    Gilchrist has official visits to South Carolina and Maryland set up right now and he loves both schools because the coaching staffs have been completely up front with him throughout the recruiting process.

    Gilchrist did admit South Carolina is his leader right now saying, “I’ll say South Carolina is in the No. 1 spot right now.”

    Look for a late July commitment from Gilchrist.

    *****

    Watts made his official visit schedule public on Friday, singling out Clemson, Wisconsin, Duke, Michigan and Boston College. The Tigers and Wolverines are the betting favorites to land his commitment at the moment but official visits could change things.

    Wisconsin and Duke have had plenty of success recruiting New England and Watts is keeping an open mind. Georgia and Alabama are lurking as well.

    *****

    Goodman will be a big riser in the rankings update next week but his recruitment is really starting to come into focus. Auburn, Penn State, Georgia, Alabama, and USC will get him for official visits between now and the dead period at the end of June but he isn’t planning on committing before August.

    At this point, Goodman puts Georgia, Penn State and Auburn in his top tier followed by USC and Alabama. He has gotten close with Georgia offensive line coach Stacy Searels, Penn State offensive line coach Phil Trautwein, USC offensive line coach Josh Henson, Auburn offensive line coach Jake Thornton and Alabama offensive line coach Chris Kapilovic.

    *****

    Ikinnagbon committed to Georgia in mid-April but he had made his decision a few weeks prior to announcing his commitment. The talented defensive lineman from New Jersey wants to compete for national championships and compete against the best competition so Georgia made sense for him.

    Georgia outside linebackers coach Chidera Uzo-Diribe is Ikinnagbon’s main recruiter and the two have formed a strong relationship. They’ve gotten to know each other on a personal level and they’re closer in age than many of the other coaches recruiting Ikinnagbon so that helped.

    At least one team hasn’t stopped recruiting Ikinnabon. Ohio State has continued to make him feel like a priority. Defensive line coach Larry Johnson has made a strong impression on Ikinnagbon and he seems to be gaining some traction. Ikinnagbon is planning on taking an official visit to Ohio State on June 7, the weekend after his scheduled official visit to Georgia on May 31.

    *****

    Oklahoma has been considered the leader for Evans but there is still plenty that needs to play out before his commitment. North Carolina will get him for an official visit on May 31 followed by Virginia on June 7 and then Oklahoma on June 21.

    An offer from Penn State this past week could make some waves though. He is expected to take an official visit to see the Nittany Lions but a date isn’t locked in just yet. Evans had been planning on committing in June but that timetable isn’t firm.

    *****

    Harris has a top 10 but his list of major contenders is shorter than that. Tennessee will get him for an official visit on June 7 followed by Maryland on June 14, and then Penn State on June 21. Florida, Syracuse and Michigan are also potential official visit candidates. Harris is looking at committing on or around July 1, but that date is flexible.

    *****

    Virginia Tech made Kemajou a priority early in the recruiting process and they appear to be in strong position heading into official visit season. Penn State is a major threat though and they’re scheduled to get him for his first official visit on May 31. West Virginia’s official visit is on June 7 followed by Duke on June 14 and then the Hokies get the last word on June 21. Kemajou isn’t planning on committing until the fall so there is a lot of time for teams to jockey for position.

    *****

    Elee’s recruitment has exploded this spring and the Rivals250 defensive end has a number of visits planned for this spring. He grew up a fan of Alabama and he’ll be in Tuscaloosa on June 22. Penn State was one of his earliest offers and they’ll host him again on June 2.

    Ohio State was one of Elee’s most recent offers and he’ll make the trip to Columbus on June 17. Look for Elee to visit Kentucky, Cincinnati, Indiana, Purdue and Notre Dame in June as part of a spring visit tour with a group of players from the Mid-Atlantic region.

    *****

    Ohio State made waves with McFadden when he visited this spring and the Buckeyes could be the team to beat in his recruitment but Colorado is a big draw for him as well. McFadden is very close with Jordan Seaton, the 2024 five-star who signed with the Buffs, and that is working in Colorado’s favor.

    McFadden has a May 31 official visit to Ohio State locked in and is planning officials to South Carolina and Colorado for June. He’s expecting to take official visits this fall with Maryland, Penn State and Florida as possible candidates.

    *****

    Coleman, a former Georgia commit, has taken a slower approach to his recruitment the second time around. North Carolina is set to get him for an official visit on June 11 and then he’ll go to Michigan State a few days later for an official visit on June 14. Coleman will also take an official visit to Penn State on June 21.

    The Nittany Lions already have commitments from three other running backs so it will be interesting to see how that trip plays out. Coleman likes each of these schools because of how much they run the ball and get the running back involved in the passing game. Look for Coleman to announce a commitment before the season.

    *****

    Woodby’s recruitment will be worth following closely over the next couple months. The former Ohio State commit took a visit to Georgia earlier this month and really enjoyed sitting down with Kirby Smart. Defensive backs coach Donte Williams is Woodby’s main point of contact and their relationship is getting stronger.

    Woodby enjoyed being around the other players and coaches during the scavenger hunt and getting to know them.Auburn, who also hosted Woodby earlier this offseason, will get him back on campus for an official visit on May 31. He also has an official visit scheduled to Maryland on June 21.

    Georgia, Oregon, and Cincinnati will get official visits from Woodby but they aren’t scheduled just yet.

    *****

    Finney’s official visit is still a bit fluid but he will be taking official visits to Penn State, Georgia, South Carolina and Oregon. His high school has been fertile recruiting territory for Penn State in the past and he’s become close with the coaching staff.

    Finney has been in touch with Georgia defensive backs coach Donte Williams. He’s excited to see how he connects with the players and coaching staff once he’s on campus.

    At South Carolina, Finney is impressed with defensive backs Torrian Gray and his ability to develop prospects. The Oregon coaching staff has done a good job with Finney so far and he’s very familiar with them.

    Michigan is also in the running for an official visit from Finney before he commits, which could happen just before or during the fall season.

    *****

    Hayer has made the rounds this spring and is looking forward to his official visits over the next four weeks. Cincinnati is up first on May 31 followed by Rutgers on June 7, Michigan State on June 14 and Maryland June 21. Those four contenders are tightly bunched ahead of his official visit schedule so this stretch of his recruitment is extremely important. Hayer expects to commit on or around July 1.

    [ad_2]

    Adam Friedman, National Recruiting Analyst

    Source link

  • Aaron Rodgers talks Jets coach Robert Saleh ‘taking a deeper role in the offense’

    Aaron Rodgers talks Jets coach Robert Saleh ‘taking a deeper role in the offense’

    [ad_1]

    FLORHAM PARK, N.J. — A look at what’s happening around the New York Jets:

    1. CE-O coach: Coach Robert Saleh received a shoutout the other day from Aaron Rodgers, who remarked, “I think Robert, to his credit, is taking a deeper role in the offense.”

    No doubt, this fueled an outside narrative that Saleh, acting with urgency in a make-or-break season, is looking over the shoulder of Nathaniel Hackett because the perception is that he has lost faith in his embattled offensive coordinator. It certainly wouldn’t be the first time a head coach got more involved on the weakest side of the ball in an attempt to save his own butt.

    Rodgers described Saleh’s involvement this way: “As a defensive coach, he’s been in that room a lot, but he’s been kind of sitting over to the left of me a good amount of the offseason so far. So we appreciate his influence. He’s brought some really good ideas to the table.”

    Let’s clear up a few things: Saleh isn’t spending all his time with the offense — he’s still involved with the defense and special teams. Yes, he’s having more direct dialogue in the classroom with offensive players than last offseason, but it’s what you’d expect from a fourth-year coach who is evolving on the job.

    There’s another reason. Look at Saleh’s background; he came from the San Francisco 49ers, where he became fluent in the Kyle Shanahan version of the West Coast offense — a regimented system that limits a quarterback’s flexibility at the line of scrimmage. The Jets used it in 2021 and 2022, but they flipped their approach with the arrival of Rodgers, who thrives on being in control.

    Last year, Saleh let Rodgers and Hackett do their thing, installing the system and teaching it to everyone. Now that he has been around Rodgers for a year and is well-versed in his offense, Saleh feels comfortable making useful suggestions, mainly from a defensive-minded perspective. If Rodgers wants to run a certain play against, say, a Cover-3 defense, he can hear the pros and cons from Saleh. It’s a healthy give-and-take.

    “He’s added a lot of interesting stuff that you’ll see throughout the OTAs and training camp, which I think would be pretty cool for us,” Rodgers said.

    Unbeknownst to many, Saleh actually got more involved in the offense over the final six games last season. By then, they already had started to move away from the Rodgers system, which didn’t suit Zach Wilson. In retrospect, the Jets will say they waited too long to make that change. As it turned out, they showed some signs of life over the final six games, averaging 16.5 points — about three points better than the first 11.

    Saleh said the goal this season is to make the offense “injury-proof,” just in case the unthinkable happens again — another Rodgers injury. They’d better get it right because they’re probably out of mulligans.

    2. Busy summer: The Jets are planning to have joint practices with the three teams they face in the preseason — the Washington Commanders (home), Carolina Panthers (away) and New York Giants (home). Joint practices have become the norm in the NFL, especially with teams shying away from playing their starters in preseason games.

    3. QB/scout: Rodgers, in an interview with the Official Jets Podcast, called Malachi Corley “my favorite receiver in the draft.” That comment will raise eyebrows, considering Corley was the 12th wide receiver drafted, taken at the top of the third round.

    “Now, he might not have been the best on paper in the draft,” Rodgers went on to say, “but I really felt like he was going to fit in with what we’re trying to do — his mindset, his ferocity.”

    No doubt, the front office was aware of Rodgers’ affinity for Corley, which might explain why it traded up to get him.

    4. Rarity for Rodgers: The Jets open the season with three games in a 10-day span, something Rodgers has experienced only once in 16 seasons as a starting quarterback. It happened way back in 2011 with the Green Bay Packers. Clearly, the physical grind didn’t affect him as a 27-year-old, as he passed for nine touchdowns and only one interception in three victories.

    But now he’s 40, coming off a major injury and a long layoff. He acknowledged it will be harder for his body to bounce back now that he’s a lot older, concluding that the three-game stretch “definitely will be a good challenge for us.”

    Week 3 is a Thursday night game against the New England Patriots. In case you’re wondering, Rodgers has dominated in Thursday night games on short weeks — an 8-4 record, with 29 touchdowns, three interceptions.

    5. Rest can wait: Teams have the option of taking their bye week immediately after games in London, but the Jets opted to pass on the bye. Why? Mostly, they preferred a late bye (Week 12). They also felt they’d have enough rest after returning from London, where they face the Minnesota Vikings in Week 5. Their next game is a Monday night home contest against the Buffalo Bills.

    6. Canton corner: Rodgers and left tackle Tyron Smith have lockers next to each other. Talk about an upscale neighborhood. You’re talking about 32 seasons of combined experience and 18 Pro Bowls. Someday, they figure to be reunited in the Pro Football Hall of Fame.

    Rodgers said he has a front-row seat to witnessing how Smith and fellow tackle Morgan Moses have been coaching up young tackles Olu Fashanu and Carter Warren.

    “Pretty cool,” Rodgers said.

    7. Safety in numbers: The most competitive position group is safety, with incumbent Tony Adams, Chuck Clark and Ashtyn Davis battling for two starting spots. Right now, Adams and Clark have the edge. Clark, a longtime starter with the Baltimore Ravens, is back to full participation after missing last season because of knee surgery.

    Add another player to the mix: Isaiah Oliver, a veteran cornerback/nickelback, was moved to safety this week.

    “The entire safety room is open,” Saleh said.

    8. Shrinking end: The Jets are giving up a lot of size at defensive end, going from John Franklin-Myers (288 pounds) to Haason Reddick (240). That could be a problem for the run defense. Reddick is “a little undersized,” said defensive coordinator Jeff Ulbrich, who believes he compensates with leverage and hand placement. Worth noting: The Philadelphia Eagles were better against the run when Reddick wasn’t on the field (3.8 yards per rush) than when he was on it (4.5).

    9. Say, Watts: Maybe the most intriguing undrafted rookie on the roster is defensive end Eric Watts out of UConn. He certainly looks the part — a sculpted 277 pounds on his 6-foot-5 frame. He ran well at the scouting combine (4.67 seconds in the 40-yard dash), fueling speculation that he could be a late-round pick despite modest production in college (9.5 sacks in four seasons).

    Watts was in demand as a free agent, eventually receiving a $225,000 guarantee from the Jets — highest among their UDFAs. That amount is equivalent to what a high sixth-round pick would receive. Watts is known for his competitive nature. If he can put it all together, maybe he can surprise.

    10. The last word: “I feel like we can win the championship — Super Bowl. We got the guys, we got the coaches. We got everything we need — the training staff, everything — that it will take for us to be able to get where we want to get to.” – cornerback Sauce Gardner on the team’s expectations.

    [ad_2]

    Rich Cimini

    Source link

  • Ten Hag to Utd: Sack me and I’ll win elsewhere

    Ten Hag to Utd: Sack me and I’ll win elsewhere

    [ad_1]

    Erik ten Hag has aimed a pointed dig at Manchester United‘s owners by saying that if they do not want him as their manager, he will win trophies for another club.

    Ten Hag lifted his second piece of silverware in as many seasons at Old Trafford thanks to United’s surprise 2-1 win over Manchester City in the FA Cup final on Saturday.

    Stream on ESPN+: LaLiga, Bundesliga, more (U.S.)

    The Dutchman said he is still in the dark about whether he will remain manager next season, but insisted he will continue to win trophies — whether he’s at United or elsewhere.

    “Two trophies in two years is not bad, three finals in two years is not bad,” Ten Hag told a postmatch news conference Saturday.

    “If they don’t want me, then I go somewhere else to win trophies because that is what I do.”

    Ten Hag’s future is in doubt following a disappointing eighth-place finish in the Premier League.

    New co-owner Sir Jim Ratcliffe has refused to offer his public backing, and sources told ESPN that club chiefs have sounded out potential candidates — including Thomas Tuchel, Mauricio Pochettino, Kieran McKenna and Thomas Frank — in case they decide to make a change.

    Ten Hag, however, insisted he has the support of Ratcliffe and his Ineos team, led by director of sport Sir Dave Brailsford.

    “That is what they always tell me,” he said. “How many times do I have to tell you? Every time it is the same question. Do I have to repeat myself 10, 15, 20 times?

    “They don’t have to tell me every week if they tell me so often. I heard it many times.”

    Ten Hag was also asked whether he felt undermined by United holding informal talks with representatives of potential replacements before issuing a strong defence of his reign.

    “I don’t know if they have done this, I can’t answer this question,” he said. “I don’t know. Maybe you have sources. I don’t have them.

    “I am in a project and we are exactly where we want to be, we are constructing a team for the future. When I took over we were in a mess. The team is developing, the team is winning and the team plays to an identity, but you need the players to be available and a strong squad, especially when you play in England and Europe.

    “There is a lot of work to do but we have value in the squad, high potentials. The team is progressing and we are winning trophies.”

    United captain Bruno Fernandes said the players were aware of the speculation over Ten Hag’s future but said it was not the players’ place to weigh in on what the board should do.

    In a postmatch interview with ESPN, Fernandes said: “That [speculation] always reaches us, nowadays it’s impossible. If it doesn’t reach 25 players, it reaches number 26 and he ends up passing the message on.

    “Nobody was worried about that. Today we had a great opportunity to win an FA Cup, something that’s very important in the UK. The focus was on the final, nobody was worried about that.

    “It’s not up to us to make decisions, including whether or not we stay, it’s up to the club to make those decisions. That’s why we have to do our best on the pitch, now enjoy the holidays, and whoever is in the national teams can do their best.”

    Fernandes added that United’s poor season in the Premier League was not absolved by the FA Cup victory.

    When asked Saturday’s win saved their season, he said: “No, it saves the FA Cup. In the Premier League we wanted to do better, to do more, in European competitions too, but in the FA Cup we managed to succeed and we’re very happy.”

    [ad_2]

    Rob Dawson

    Source link

  • Bryce Harper hits a 3-run homer in Phillies’ 9th-inning rally to beat Rockies 8-4

    Bryce Harper hits a 3-run homer in Phillies’ 9th-inning rally to beat Rockies 8-4

    [ad_1]

    DENVER — Bryce Harper hit a three-run homer in Philadelphia’s six-run ninth inning and the Phillies rallied past the Colorado Rockies 8-4 on Saturday night for their seventh win in eight games.

    Trailing 3-2 in the ninth, the Phillies broke through to snap the Rockies’ five-game home winning streak. After Brandon Marsh drew a leadoff walk against Jalen Beeks, Justin Lawrence (1-3) relieved and was greeted by Edmundo Sosa’s RBI triple. Garrett Stubbs followed with an RBI single to put the Phillies in front 4-3.

    “It was pretty cool to be able to just come up in an opportunity like that and take advantage of it,” Stubbs said. “And then watch everybody else just kind of pile it on.”

    After Kody Clemens grounded into a double play, Kyle Schwarber doubled for his third hit of the game and Bryson Stott walked. Harper, ejected in the first inning of Friday’s 11-inning loss to the Rockies for arguing a strike call, drove John Curtiss’ pitch over the left field fence for his 13th home run of the season.

    “He’s a superstar and that’s what they do,” Phillies manager Rob Thomson said of Harper.

    Nick Castellanos’ RBI single capped Philadelphia’s outburst.

    José Ruiz (1-0) got the win, working a scoreless inning in relief. The Rockies got a solid outing from Dakota Hudson, who went six innings and allowed two runs on five hits, and Lawrence lamented he could not close it out for his team.

    “Just frustration,” said Lawrence, who blew a save for the third time in five chances. “You just want to finish it off and I feel like it’s a couple times now that spoiled some really, really good starts by our guys.”

    Charlie Blackmon hit a two-out RBI double in the ninth for the Rockies for the 600th extra-base hit of his career, the second most in Rockies franchise history. Brenton Doyle had a pair of hits and stole a career-high three bases.

    Rockies left fielder Jordan Beck left after landing hard on his glove (left) hand while making a diving catch of Castellanos’ sinking liner for the final out in the top of the first inning. After the game, manager Bud Black said Beck had suffered a broken hand. There was no immediate timetable for his return.

    The Rockies built a 3-1 lead against Aaron Nola before the Phillies pulled within a run in the top of the fifth on Schwarber’s sacrifice fly, which scored Stubbs after he reached third base on a delayed steal.

    Harper singled in the top of the first to drive in Philadelphia’s first run, but Colorado scored single runs in each of the first three innings on Brendan Rodgers’ RBI single, Kris Bryant’s run-scoring groundout and Hunter Goodman’s fielder’s choice, which brought home Doyle from third after he singled and stole second.

    TRAINER’S ROOM

    Phillies: SS Trea Turner, who’s rehabbing a strained left hamstring, did conditioning work Saturday on the field and took swings in the batting cage. He has been on the injured list since May 4.

    Rockies: LHP Kyle Freeland, sidelined since mid-April with a strained left elbow, was scheduled to throw bullpen sessions on Sunday and Tuesday. If all goes well, he could pitch a simulated game, facing live hitters, in seven to 10 days, according to Black.

    UP NEXT

    LHP Ranger Suárez (9-0, 1.36 ERA) will look to remain unbeaten and push his win total to double digits when he takes the mound for Sunday’s series finale at Colorado, which counters with RHP Cal Quantrill (3-3, 3.59).

    AP MLB: https://apnews.com/hub/mlb

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Rivals.com  –  UCLA lands big pledge from four-star QB Madden Iamaleava

    Rivals.com – UCLA lands big pledge from four-star QB Madden Iamaleava

    [ad_1]









    UCLA Lands Big Pledge From Four-star QB Madden Iamaleava – Rivals.com














    The new UCLA coaching staff and especially the offensive staff showed Madden Iamaleava love and attention ever since getting to town and it has paid off in a big way.On Saturday, the four-star quar…

    You must be a member to read the full article. Subscribe now for instant access to all premium content.


    • icn-check-mark Created with Sketch.

      Members-only forums


    • icn-check-mark Created with Sketch.

      Predict prospect commits with FanFutureCast


    • icn-check-mark Created with Sketch.

      Exclusive highlights and interviews


    • icn-check-mark Created with Sketch.

      Exclusive coverage of Rivals Camp Series


    • icn-check-mark Created with Sketch.

      Breaking recruiting news

    Certain Data by Sportradar

    © 2024 Yahoo. All rights reserved.

    [ad_2]

    Adam Gorney, National Recruiting Director

    Source link

  • Jack Catterall beats Josh Taylor by unanimous decision in epic rematch in Leeds

    Jack Catterall beats Josh Taylor by unanimous decision in epic rematch in Leeds

    [ad_1]

    Jack Catterall beat former undisputed world super lightweight champion Josh Taylor by a unanimous decision in a thrilling rematch in Leeds on Saturday night.

    Catterall avenged his controversial split-decision defeat to Taylor in Glasgow two years ago, landing the heavier punches to finally settle the score in one of British boxing’s biggest grudge fights in recent memory.

    All three judges gave the fight at a sold-out First Direct Arena to Catterall, two by scores of 117-111 and the other by 116-113, although Taylor will feel aggrieved it was not scored closer.

    Taylor worked busily behind his jab in the early rounds, while southpaw Catterall enjoyed particular success with his left hook.

    After an accidental clash of heads in the second round Taylor briefly backed his opponent on to the ropes, but Catterall responded with a swinging left before another head clash at the start of the third caused Taylor to wince.

    Image:
    Jack Catterall and Josh Taylor produced an epic for the Leeds crowd

    Catterall landed two successive lefts at the end of the fourth and looked to take charge in the fifth, finding his range with his jab before hurting Taylor with a series of lefts and rights that pressed the Scot against the ropes.

    Taylor regained his composure in the sixth despite a swelling under his right eye, but Catterall’s punches continued to be more accurate and heavier.

    Two short rights from Taylor gave him momentum in the seventh as both fighters traded blows and the Scot proved more effective again in the eighth to even up the fight.

    Catterall breached his opponent’s defence early in the ninth and both boxers went toe-to-toe.

    Taylor stalked his man in the 10th, now looking the more menacing fighter, and landed with a right and then an uppercut.

    But a thundering straight right from Catterall in the 11th had Taylor in trouble with little to separate the pair going into the final round as they punched themselves to a standstill.

    Jack Catterall refused to be denied a second time after losing out to Josh Taylor in their controversial first fight
    Image:
    Jack Catterall refused to be denied a second time after losing out to Josh Taylor in their controversial first fight

    The two fighters first clashed in February 2022 when Taylor controversially retained his WBC, WBA, IBF and WBO belts in Glasgow via a contentious split decision.

    Most observers felt Chorley’s Catterall did enough to win and in the two years since, the fighters have traded insults in person and on social media.

    This second meeting – no belts were on the line – was twice postponed, first in January 2023 due to Taylor’s foot injury and again in March this year when the Scot had a minor eye problem.

    Taylor, who became Britain’s first undisputed world champion in the four-belt era by defeating Jose Ramirez in Las Vegas in 2021, lost to American Teofimo Lopez in June last year in his only fight since first facing Catterall.

    The Edinburgh man’s record now stands at 20-2, with Catterall’s at 29-1 and there will now be a clamour for a decisive third meeting.

    Earlier on the undercard, Jamaican-born Chev Clarke won the vacant British cruiserweight title by knocking out Lewisham’s Ellis Zorro in the eighth round.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Veteran C Price retires after ‘terrifying’ blood clot

    Veteran C Price retires after ‘terrifying’ blood clot

    [ad_1]

    Billy Price, a 2018 first-round draft pick, announced his retirement from the NFL on Saturday because of the potential of complications from a blood clot.

    “In the blink of an eye, everything can be taken away,” Price wrote on Instagram. “On April 24th I had emergency pulmonary embolism surgery to remove a saddle clot that was entering both of my lungs. As a healthy 29 year old, an unprovoked pulmonary embolism with no further medical explanation is terrifying. I am truly thankful to be alive today.

    “Unfortunately, I will be retiring from the NFL as the risk of an internal bleed while on blood thinners creates tremendous risk.”

    Price, a center, last played in the NFL with the Arizona Cardinals during the 2022 season.

    He played in 69 career games (45 starts) with the Bengals, Giants and Cardinals since being selected by Cincinnati with the 21st pick of the 2018 NFL draft out of Ohio State.

    With the Buckeyes, he won the Rimington Trophy, which honors the nation’s top center, in 2017.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Haliburton unlikely to play Game 3, sources say

    Haliburton unlikely to play Game 3, sources say

    [ad_1]

    Indiana Pacers All-NBA guard Tyrese Haliburton is unlikely to play in Game 3 on Saturday night vs. the Boston Celtics due to a left hamstring injury, sources told ESPN’s Adrian Wojnarowski.

    Haliburton left the third quarter of Game 2’s loss in Boston after aggravating the injury.

    Haliburton missed 10 games with a left hamstring strain suffered Jan. 8 against the Celtics and the injury has limited him at points this season.

    After posting 25 points and 10 assists in Game 1, Haliburton finished with 10 points on 4-of-8 shooting (2-of-6 from 3-point range) and 8 assists. The Pacers outscored the Celtics by one point with Haliburton on the floor in Game 2 but were outscored by 17 when he was off it.

    The Pacers head into Game 3 in Indianapolis down 2-0 in the series.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Bobrovsky, Shesterkin matching each other save-for-save in Panthers-Rangers series for East title

    Bobrovsky, Shesterkin matching each other save-for-save in Panthers-Rangers series for East title

    [ad_1]

    SUNRISE, Fla. — The Eastern Conference Finals have been a goaltender duel, and nobody should have expected otherwise.

    Seems fitting that the Florida Panthers and New York Rangers are knotted at one game apiece heading into Game 3 on Sunday afternoon, given that a pair of Russian netminders and past Vezina Trophy winners as the league’s top goalie — Sergei Bobrovsky for the Panthers, Igor Shesterkin for the Rangers — have basically matched each other save-for-save, stat-for-stat.

    Bobrovsky has allowed the Rangers to score two goals. Shesterkin has allowed the Panthers to score two goals, not counting an own goal deflected in by a teammate and an empty-netter that New York yielded in Game 1. And the similarities hardly end there.

    “It’s definitely fun,” Bobrovsky said.

    Fun is one way to describe it. Hair-raising, gut-churning, and nail-biting would also apply.

    The Rangers evened the series on Friday with a 2-1 overtime win at Madison Square Garden, Barclay Goodrow the hero 14:01 into the extra session by beating Bobrovsky and giving New York — which finished with the NHL’s best regular season record — a needed split of the first two games before heading on the road for Games 3 and 4.

    There’s been almost no breathing room over the first two games: Through 134 minutes and 1 second of hockey so far in the East finals, 130:13 of it has come with the margin on the scoreboard being one goal or less. The goalies have just been that hard to beat.

    “He’s been terrific, he’s been terrific this year and he’s certainly been terrific in the playoffs,” Rangers coach Peter Laviolette said of Shesterkin. “I thought there was good goaltending at both ends. … Both of these guys are good goaltenders.”

    Take away the own goal from Game 1 — Florida’s Carter Verhaeghe got credited with a score that made it 2-0 late in the third when Alexis Lafrenière tipped the puck past Shesterkin — and the goaltender numbers are almost perfectly matched. Bobrovsky has stopped 52 of 54 shots he’s seen, a .963 save percentage. Shesterkin has stopped 50 of the 52 Florida shots that have gotten to him, a .962 mark.

    And it’s not a new thing that Bobrovsky and Shesterkin are mirroring one another. Consider these stats, which include both this regular season and the playoffs:

    — Shesterkin’s record is 45-20-2, Bobrovsky’s is 45-21-4. They both had 36 regular-season wins, they both have nine wins so far in the playoffs.

    — Shesterkin’s save percentage is .915, Bobrovsky’s is .914.

    — Bobrovsky’s goals-against average is 2.33, Shesterkin’s is 2.51.

    — Bobrovsky’s even-strength save percentage is .922, Shesterkin’s is .920.

    — Bobrovsky’s save percentage when facing a power play is .877, Shesterkin’s is .871.

    “Two really good goaltenders at each end,” Panthers coach Paul Maurice said. “It’s an exciting series, exciting hockey. Lots of hits, lots of action.”

    Just not a lot of goals.

    “Obviously, two of the best goalies in the world and it’s a showdown out there,” Verhaeghe said. “We’re looking to get chances and they both are playing unreal. That’s all I can say.”

    Goodrow scored four goals, one of them a game-winner, on 61 shots in 80 games during the regular season for the Rangers. In the 12 playoff games, he has four goals, two of them game-winners, on just 12 shots.

    He was asked to explain. He could not.

    “I don’t know,” said Goodrow, the only skater in the Rangers lineup who has won a Stanley Cup; backup goalie Jonathan Quick is a three-time Cup hoister, including last season with Vegas. “I’m just trying to bring the same game every night, trying to do whatever I can to help the team win games.”

    Going back to his time in Columbus, Bobrovsky had won 12 consecutive overtime playoff games — tying the longest such streak in NHL history with Patrick Roy.

    And the Panthers had won 11 OT playoff contests in a row, which ends up as the second-longest run in Stanley Cup playoff history behind a 14-game stretch of OT wins by Montreal from 1993 through 1998 (with Roy in the net for much of that).

    Florida fell to 13-9 all-time in playoff overtime games.

    Friday’s game was the 100th playoff overtime game in Rangers history. It was the 98th playoff game — total — in Panthers history.

    ___

    AP NHL playoffs: https://apnews.com/hub/stanley-cup and https://www.apnews.com/hub/NHL

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Charles Schwab Challenge: Scottie Scheffler makes impact as Davis Riley leads on 10 under par

    Charles Schwab Challenge: Scottie Scheffler makes impact as Davis Riley leads on 10 under par

    [ad_1]

    World No 1 Scottie Scheffler made an impact in the second round of the Charles Schwab Challenge as Davis Riley moved to 10-under after polishing off a bogey-free six-under 64 to lead in Texas.

    Riley entered the weekend at 10-under on 130, two shots clear of the field. After racking up five of his six birdies in a six-hole stretch midway through his round, Riley faced a three-feet left putt for par at his final hole, the par-four ninth, when play was suspended due to a dangerous weather situation at Colonial Country Club, Fort Worth.

    Scheffler was in danger of missing the cut after opening with a two-over 72 but he fared better on Friday when he made four straight birdies amid a bogey-free 65 to get to three-under par.

    “I was starving, so I got some food, which was nice,” Riley said after the one hour and nine minutes weather delay.

    “Luckily, it was a three-footer straight up the hill. So wasn’t too much to stress about.

    “I knocked in about five three-footers before walking over there to cap off the round. Yeah, hit it centre cut and made it. It was nice to finish the day and made for a good pretty stress-free six-under.”

    Riley birdied the 15th and 16th holes before running in three more at the 18th, first and second. He capped his scoring for the day by sticking his approach at the par-four sixth hole 10 feet away, then draining the right-to-left putt.

    Pierceson Coody and Hayden Buckley each shot 65 to take second place at eight-under.

    Buckley made five birdies on a bogey-free round, while Coody holed out for an eagle two on a 49-yard pitch shot from the second fairway and he managed to finish his day with three straight birdies.

    Coody, 24, and his twin brother Parker Coody are in the field on sponsor invitations. They played at the University of Texas and are getting their professional careers off the ground.

    “It’s a nice feeling (being tied for second) because the season hasn’t been what I wanted it to be this year, and to know that my game’s going the right direction, it’s great,” Pierceson Coody said.

    “I’m trying to stay kind of in a process mindset with everything and just build because I know I have still a lot of events left and an opportunity to go win the tournament is a great feeling.”

    Get the best prices and book a round at one of 1,700 courses across the UK & Ireland

    Parker Coody made the cut on the number at two-over par.

    Meanwhile, South Korea’s Sungjae Im matched Riley for the low round of the day with a 64 and is in a tie at six-under with Keegan Bradley (66) and Austria’s Sepp Straka (66).

    Brian Harman and Tony Finau each shot 69 on Friday and are in a five-way tie at five-under.

    Gary Woodland, the 2019 US Open winner who is back on tour after surgery to remove a brain tumour, had the only other 64 of the day and is tied at four-under.

    Woodland picked up an eagle, seven birdies and three bogeys. It was Woodland’s lowest round since returning to competition.

    “I’m still battling, still on medication, still battling all the (symptoms), but probably a little more positive, I would say, the last three weeks than I was earlier this year,” Woodland said.

    “I think I was getting down on myself just because I didn’t feel well. There’s a lot to be positive about because I’m in a different position than I was a year ago.”

    Harris English (three-over), Colombia’s Camilo Villegas (four-over) and Max Homa (seven-over) all missed the cut.

    Continue to watch the PGA Tour’s Charles Schwab Challenge live on Sky Sports Golf on Saturday from 5pm.

    Ad content | Stream Sky Sports on NOW

    Stream Sky Sports live with no contract on a Month or Day membership on NOW. Instant access to live action from the Premier League and EFL, plus darts, cricket, tennis, golf and so much more.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Mueller: Has the NFL WR market reached a breaking point? How much is too much?

    Mueller: Has the NFL WR market reached a breaking point? How much is too much?

    [ad_1]

    I’m not one for letting good players walk out the door.

    I know from experience that talent is too hard to replace, even with the best-hatched plan, without taking a step backward. So I understand that, at least sometimes, proven teams need to overpay slightly for the sake of continuity.

    But recent contracts for NFL wide receivers have forced me to at least question my philosophy. And that tells me that general managers and team-builders around the NFL are no doubt contemplating that question as well.

    It’s not because these receivers lack talent. They are all really good players. But the contract numbers are making the team-building equation more complicated than ever.

    The dilemma is twofold. First, if you’re going to pay a wide receiver more than $30 million per year, are you sure he’s a difference-maker and not just a guy who fits your system? And second, is it feasible to pay big salaries to more than one wide receiver on your roster?

    Ten years ago, the NFL’s top-paid wide receivers made about $16 million annually, equaling about 12 percent of the $133 million cap. Today, A.J. Brown leads the way at $32 million annually on a cap of $255 million. That’s still just 12.5 percent of the cap. But let’s look closer.

    In 2014, the two receivers making $16 million annually were Calvin Johnson and Larry Fitzgerald, the clear standard-bearers at the position. There weren’t enough top-of-the-heap receivers that every new contract would reset the market. Dez Bryant, Demaryius Thomas, Julio Jones and A.J. Green signed new contracts in 2015, but none exceeded $15 million per year. Fitzgerald’s and Johnson’s deals weren’t eclipsed until Antonio Brown hit $17 million per year in 2017 (a year after Johnson retired), just 10.2 percent of the $167 million cap.

    The receiver market has already been reset twice in the past month, and we are on the verge of another jump with Justin Jefferson, CeeDee Lamb, Ja’Marr Chase and Brandon Aiyuk all up for new deals. All four could plausibly reset the market, so we might be looking at $35 million per year — which would be 13.7 percent of the cap — or more. That leaves the Minnesota Vikings, Dallas Cowboys, Cincinnati Bengals and San Francisco 49ers with big decisions with implications across their rosters.

    GO DEEPER

    Justin Jefferson extension is now No. 1 priority for Vikings

    Teams must take a hard look at where this money will come from. How much is too much for a non-quarterback? Does it make sense for a position group other than QB to exceed 20 percent of a team’s cap? How would that affect decisions elsewhere on the roster?

    Jefferson is arguably the best receiver in the league, and Minnesota should certainly extend him. But the cost will tighten money to spend elsewhere, like on last year’s first-round pick, 22-year-old Jordan Addison, when his rookie deal ends. Of course, if the Vikings’ assessment of J.J. McCarthy proves accurate, a quality quarterback on a five-year rookie contract might be just what the doctor ordered. If I were running the Vikings, I would pay Jefferson and keep churning WR2 at the end of Addison’s deal.

    Jerry Jones and the Cowboys probably need to be much more creative in dealing with Lamb. Jones already has a $50 million-plus quarterback quandary on his hands, with Dak Prescott having all the leverage in an endless game of chicken. As long as Prescott is the QB, the Cowboys’ evaluation skills might be challenged beyond most as they seek value from other receivers to pair with Lamb.

    If I were the Bengals, I would probably sign Chase — who still has two years left on his deal — as soon as possible to avoid resetting the market after Lamb’s and Jefferson’s deals come in. Cincinnati already appears to be planning to let Tee Higgins walk after this season, which might necessitate another high NFL Draft investment at the position next year.

    go-deeper

    GO DEEPER

    The Tee Higgins-Bengals crossroads, Part 3: Ja’Marr Chase extension and paying 2 top WRs

    The 49ers have a more complicated situation than the Bengals, having already paid Deebo Samuel ($23.8 million per year, $28.6 million against the cap in 2024) and with Aiyuk ($14.1 million against the cap in 2024) in the last year of his contract. Both players’ names have been popular in trade rumors this offseason. The Niners hedged their bet by drafting Florida receiver Ricky Pearsall in Round 1 last month, giving themselves options at the position.

    My crystal ball tells me this group will undergo a renovation after the 2024 season. Aiyuk and Samuel are set to count $42.7 million against the cap this season. Add Pearsall and tight end George Kittle and that’s more than $56 million against the cap (22 percent) for four pass catchers. Samuel is the NFL’s eighth-highest-paid wideout and might rank third in the 49ers’ position room when it comes to route running and ball skills. Something will have to give.

    Brandon Aiyuk and Deebo Samuel


    Will Deebo Samuel, left, or Brandon Aiyuk be elsewhere in 2025? (Thearon W. Henderson / Getty Images)

    Players deserve whatever they can get — I am not here to dispute this — but even NFL teams with the most creative capologists will eventually be forced to pay for their extensions of credit, just like you and I. So what will they do about the rising costs of receivers?

    When players get too expensive, nothing speaks louder than cheaper options.

    Teams selected 35 wide receivers in the 2024 draft. That’s not unordinary, but the total of seven picked in Round 1 grabbed my attention. Sure, it might just have been a year with several special talents available. But it also might speak to a few other factors:

    1. With experienced receivers becoming more expensive, teams need more cheap talent.

    2. In this era of seven-on-seven competitions and wide-open passing offenses in college, receivers have more advanced skills at a younger age.

    3. Good talent evaluators can identify and sequence receivers properly, with smoother projections to the NFL.

    If you can identify the traits — beyond stats, height, weight and speed — that lend to a reasonably high hit rate on prospects, you can find value. These would be my top three traits, which you can find if you watch enough tape, for a receiver to fit any scheme:

    • Create separation at the break point and/or change gears while underway in a route.

    • See and distinguish coverage with your mind and reactions (or instincts), pre- and post-snap.

    • Consistently extend to catch with your hands near defenders, allowing small guys to play bigger and big guys to be great.

    go-deeper

    GO DEEPER

    How WRs’ new leverage is changing roster-building strategies

    The last few draft classes have been rich in receiver talent. Even in a watered-down free-agent pool this year, there were several good values. In short, you don’t have to pay top-notch to get value at wide receiver.

    Some teams, such as the Green Bay Packers, Kansas City Chiefs and Buffalo Bills, have already picked a lane. (Of course, having a talented quarterback makes it easier for them to consider this road.)

    The Packers and Chiefs traded Davante Adams and Tyreek Hill before the 2022 season instead of paying them. Adams got $28 million from the Las Vegas Raiders, and Hill got $30 million annually from the Miami Dolphins. The Bills traded Stefon Diggs to the Houston Texans this offseason, two years after signing him to an extension worth $24 million annually.

    Though the Adams trade has not exactly worked out for the Raiders, Packers GM Brian Gutekunst has reworked Green Bay’s receivers via the developmental route.

    Christian Watson, drafted in the second round in 2022, is a straight-line-fast long-strider who can eat up a cushion, take the top off defenses and catch when he’s covered. His game is similar to that of Jameson Williams, whom the Detroit Lions drafted 22 picks earlier. In Round 4 that year, the Packers took Romeo Doubs, who will make $1.1 million this year after catching 59 passes in 2023. Doubs’ ability to find soft spots and distinguish coverages resembles that of the Lions’ Amon-Ra St. Brown, at least stylistically.

    Last year, the Packers took Jayden Reed (64 catches as a rookie) in Round 2 and Dontayvion Wicks (39 catches, 14.9 yards per catch) in Round 5. Given his acceleration off the ball and out of breaks, Wicks might have more upside than any of the above.

    go-deeper

    GO DEEPER

    Young Packers wide receivers creating major impact in present, excitement for future

    Sure, it requires conviction in your evaluations, but Green Bay should be lauded for overhauling this group almost entirely with draft picks (none in Round 1), as those four receivers will cost a total of $6.3 million against the cap in 2024. Other teams should try to copy this economic model.

    I’m not saying the Lions are wrong, but it’s a useful comparison. They reset the market by paying St. Brown $30 million per year even though he ranked 71st in the NFL in average air yards per target (7.75) and 39th in average yards per reception (12.7) last season. I understand the importance of keeping peace in the locker room and rewarding hard workers and leaders. He fits their system. But that signing might have ruffled a few feathers outside of the Lions’ front office and fans, who think it is money well spent. The Lions did let 29-year-old wideout Josh Reynolds walk, so they have shown they are willing to make tough choices, too.

    The Chiefs, no doubt aided by Patrick Mahomes’ presence, have thrived since bailing on the market and going young, like the Packers. The Bills, with Josh Allen, have taken a similar route this offseason, choosing quantity over quality with reasonably priced veterans in Curtis Samuel, Marquez Valdes-Scantling and Chase Claypool and second-round rookie Keon Coleman, after trading Diggs and letting Gabe Davis walk.

    Of course, there are still teams on the opposite end of the spectrum. The Seattle Seahawks paid DK Metcalf and Tyler Lockett a total of $41.3 million annually (they restructured Lockett’s deal this offseason), then drafted a receiver (Jaxon Smith-Njigba) in Round 1 in 2023. The Philadelphia Eagles paid Brown and DeVonta Smith this offseason a combined $57 million annually (22.4 percent of the cap), even after signing quarterback Jalen Hurts to a record deal last offseason.

    The Eagles made those investments after struggling to draft and develop receivers, missing on top-60 picks in Jordan Matthews, Nelson Agholor, JJ Arcega-Whiteside and Jalen Reagor. I can’t help but wonder: Was paying Brown and Smith a reaction to their previous struggles at the position?

    There’s not necessarily a correct way to handle the rising costs at wide receiver. If there is, I’m not sure we know it just yet. Many theories are still being tested.

    But here is something to consider: Teams will always have to pay great money for good players at positions where there is true scarcity, like quarterback. But I don’t see wide receiver, especially in the modern NFL, as a position of true scarcity. As a result, the sticker shock of recent contracts has given me pause.

    I’m still not for letting any good player walk, but with each market-setting deal, the costs are getting harder to justify.

    (Top photos of Amon-Ra St. Brown, left, and Justin Jefferson: Cooper Neill, Grant Halverson / Getty Images)

    The Football 100

    The Football 100

    The story of the greatest players in NFL history. In 100 riveting profiles, top football writers justify their selections and uncover the history of the NFL in the process.

    The story of the greatest players in NFL history.

    BuyBuy The Football 100

    Undeniable

    Undeniable

    Relive  the Kansas City Chiefs’ unforgettable 2023 championship season. Undeniable takes fans from training camp through the final whistle in Las Vegas.

    Relive the Kansas City Chiefs’ unforgettable 2023 championship season.

    BuyBuy Undeniable

    [ad_2]

    The New York Times

    Source link

  • Chase Elliott calls out NASCAR for sharing fight video

    Chase Elliott calls out NASCAR for sharing fight video

    [ad_1]

    Chase Elliott, NASCAR’s most popular driver, had pointed criticism for NASCAR after the sanctioning body issued a record fine earlier this week against Ricky Stenhouse Jr. for his role in a fight following last Sunday’s All-Star Race at North Wilkesboro.

    Elliott was aware Stenhouse had been fined for throwing a punch at Kyle Busch, but the 2020 Cup Series champion did not know the exact amount before being informed during a press conference Friday at Charlotte Motor Speedway, the site of Sunday’s Coca-Cola 600.

    Stenhouse was fined $75,000, the largest fine issued in NASCAR history for a driver fighting. Elliott appeared in disbelief upon learning the exact dollar figure.

    “Seventy-five thousand? Wow,” Elliott said. “I heard he got fined, but I didn’t know it was $75,000.

    “Yeah, that’s a lot. That’s a lot of money. That seems wild to me.”

    The stunned reaction by Elliott stems from the fact that NASCAR fined Stenhouse despite actively sharing footage of the fight across its social media channels. What Elliott took exception to is what he sees as a double standard where NASCAR has touted the fight multiple times, yet not only penalized Stenhouse but did so by handing down a record fine.

    “That seems like a lot for that situation,” Elliott said. “You’re going to fine him, but you’re going to promote with it? Like what are we doing? That’s a little strange to me.

    “That’s a lot of money to fine a guy. It’s not OK, but we’re going to blast it all over everything to get more clicks. I don’t really agree with that.”

    Elliott is not the only driver to raise the issue. Daniel Suarez posted a similar sentiment on X.

    “If it’s so wrong then why is it all over NASCAR social channels?” Suarez posted. “We should be allowed to show our emotions, I don’t get it.”

    Stenhouse confronted Busch following the All-Star Race after Busch appeared to intentionally wreck him on the second lap of the non-points event for what Busch thought was an overly aggressive move on the opening lap.

    Upon completion of the race, Stenhouse waited for Busch at Busch’s Richard Childress Racing hauler, a span of 90-plus minutes from the time he crashed until the confrontation. After Stenhouse and Busch had a short, heated exchange of words, Stenhouse punched Busch in the head. That triggered a fight between their respective teams, which included Stenhouse’s dad charging at Busch and starting a physical confrontation between them.

    Busch was not suspended for his actions. NASCAR suspended Ricky Stenhouse Sr. indefinitely, while also suspending two members of Stenhouse Jr.’s JTG Daugherty Racing team, mechanic Clint Myrick for eight races and engine tuner Keith Matthews for four races.

    Although NASCAR has not always penalized drivers who fight, the difference, NASCAR senior vice president of competition Elton Sawyer explained Wednesday, was that Stenhouse had ample time to cool down before initiating the fight.

    “I will say when you wait, you know, 198 laps and you make those decisions that were made, we’re going to react to that,” Sawyer said on SiriusXM NASCAR Radio. “There could have been different decisions made.

    “We want the two drivers to be able to have their time to express their differences. But again, once it escalates to where there’s been a physical altercation there, again, we’re going to react.”

    Busch was not penalized because NASCAR could not determine that he intentionally wrecked Stenhouse.

    NASCAR’s decision to suspend Stenhouse Sr. was consistent with NASCAR’s policy that non-competitors are not to involve themselves in confrontations.

    Required reading

    (Photo: Sean Gardner / Getty Images)

    [ad_2]

    The New York Times

    Source link

  • Welcome to Iga’s Bakery: How the world No 1 bagels her opponents

    Welcome to Iga’s Bakery: How the world No 1 bagels her opponents

    [ad_1]

    Follow live coverage of the first day of the French Open 2024 today

    This article is part of the launch of extended tennis coverage on The Athletic, which will go beyond the baseline to bring you the biggest stories on and off the court. To follow the tennis vertical, click here.


    Getting ‘bagelled’ in tennis is a humiliation.

    To not win a single game suggests a mismatch, that one of the players is either out of their depth or having a terrible day on court.

    Bagels — as sets that end 6-0 are known, because the zero looks like one — are seen as such an embarrassment largely because they are so rare. Twelve per cent of WTA Tour matches in 2023 included a bagel, according to data from Opta.

    In just five years on tour however, world No 1 Iga Swiatek has shattered this orthodoxy.

    During 2023, Swiatek won a bagel set in 29 per cent of her matches. That’s almost one in three. Her total of 23 bagels for the year was 15 higher than the players with the second-most on the women’s tour — Coco Gauff and Jessica Pegula, both with eight. Excluding matches Swiatek played in, the average for the WTA Tour last year was a bagel set in just 11.4 per cent of matches, according to Opta.

    For Swiatek’s WTA career as a whole, an average of 40.6 per cent of her matches have included either a 6-0 set or a 6-1.


    Swiatek is ruthless in running over opponents (Dan Istitene/Getty Images)

    That’s a bagel or breadstick in close to half of her tour matches — you can see why the term “Iga’s Bakery” has entered tennis parlance.

    Heading into the looming French Open, where Swiatek is a three-time champion and winner of the past two tournaments, she shows no signs of slowing down. In 2024, Swiatek has won the most bagel sets (eight) of anyone on the WTA Tour, ahead of Gauff (seven) and Aryna Sabalenka (five).

    In her last two events — winning the title in Madrid and also in Rome — Swiatek has dished out three bagel sets. And as The Athletic showed last month, her number of bagels per week while world No 1 stacks up against the greats — bettered only by 18-time Grand Slam champion Chris Evert.

    But how does she do it? Using data from Hawk-Eye and speaking to the players who have to face her each week, including world No 3 Gauff, world No 4 and Wimbledon champion Elena Rybakina, and Grand Slam winners including Victoria Azarenka and Marketa Vondrousova, here are the staple ingredients at Iga’s Bakery.

    go-deeper

    GO DEEPER

    Iga Swiatek’s 100 weeks as world No 1: The streak, the slams, the bagels


    To regularly win bagel sets, you have to be solid in all areas, particularly in returning well enough that every game is about who is the better tennis player, rather than the better server.

    Swiatek is a master of this, and that’s why she is so good at running away with sets.

    “She doesn’t have any holes in her game,” says world No 11 Daria Kasatkina, who has lost in straight sets the last five times she’s played Swiatek. These include a 6-3, 6-0 defeat in Doha, Qatar two years ago.

    “In tennis in general, that’s very important. She returns very well, and though sometimes she can have some troubles on serve, generally she’s very stable in all aspects. She can switch from defence to attack very quickly. So for me, this is one of her weapons. And mentally, she is very strong.”


    Swiatek has 21 titles at 22, including four Grand Slams (Michael Owens/Getty Images)

    Vondrousova, the world No 6 and reigning Wimbledon champion, has played Swiatek three times and is yet to win a set, suffering a bagel and two breadsticks. “If she’s on fire, there’s not much you can do. She doesn’t have a worse side to try and hit,” Vondrousova says.

    Having accumulated over 100 weeks as world No 1, Swiatek’s base level is clearly outstanding — even in sets she doesn’t win to love or one. But is there anything she does especially differently when running away with it?


    Using Hawk-Eye data, The Athletic has sorted Swiatek’s sets played into bagels and those that were 6-2 or closer.

    In her bagel sets, Swiatek produces more unreturned serves: 31 per cent compared to 27 per cent. Her service games get quicker by 17 seconds on average as a result; her return games, meanwhile, speed up by 16 seconds.

    This supports what the eye-test says. Watching Swiatek put another bagel in the oven, it feels that things are spiralling quickly out of control for her opponent. This is demonstrated by the average length of return games, which are three minutes and 18 seconds if it’s game one of a bagel set; four minutes and 48 seconds if it’s the third game; and three minutes and three seconds if it’s the sixth.

    By this point, whoever Swiatek is playing is seemingly thinking, ‘Please, make it stop’, and is almost happy to get off the court. By the sixth game of a bagel set, Swiatek hits her returns four miles per hour faster on average than in game one — reflecting a higher level of aggression as she motors towards the finishing line.

    Overall, Swiatek returns far better in sets she wins 6-0 than in the ones that are 6-2 or closer. She returns 88 per cent of first serves and 92 per cent of second serves in the former, compared to 79 per cent and 84 per cent in the latter.


    Swiatek is a master of playing with a lead (Clive Brunskill/Getty Images)

    As well as getting more balls in play, she returns more aggressively in bagel sets. Her first-serve return hit point is closer to the baseline (12.2m from the net compared to 12.4m) and her first-serve return net clearance is lower (87cm compared to 92cm).

    These are small numbers in isolation, but put together they add up to Swiatek strangling her opponents’ game.

    “I felt like her depth was so good from the first ball,” world No 16 Madison Keys, who in the past few weeks has lost 6-1, 6-3 to Switaek in both Madrid and Rome, says of that first meeting. “She makes you feel like you can never get your foot on the gas. And then, all of a sudden, you’re the one backing up off the baseline, and that’s not a scenario you want to find yourself in. You don’t want to be behind the baseline trying to run.

    “She puts you in a tricky position because you feel like you have to go for something you don’t want to and then you’re threading the needle between going for something that could be dumb but also feeling like it’s kind of the only thing you can do.”

    Players don’t just struggle to stay with her — she takes matches away from them.

    When Swiatek is rolling, she gets more clinical.


    Facing Swiatek on a roll can be a disorienting experience (Julian Finney/Getty Images)

    Break-point conversion rises to 67.9 per cent in bagel sets from 54.7 in closer ones, and she wins 31.5 per cent of converted break points with a winner, compared to 26.1 per cent. In general, Swiatek’s winners as a proportion of her points won go up in bagel sets (from 26.1 per cent to 28.9), as do points won from forced errors (17.2 per cent up to 18.5 per cent).

    As Keys explained, a lot of those forced errors come from players feeling like they have to go for more than they are really comfortable with.


    What is striking about all these data points is that Swiatek’s groundstrokes don’t change all that much.

    Her average forehand speed is the same (75mph), as is her average backhand speed (70mph). The spin rate is a bit higher during bagel sets on both the forehand (2476rpm compared to 2416) and on the backhand side (1965rpm compared to 1901), but not by much. Her average net clearance is similar on both wings as well.

    This suggests that the sequences where Swiatek rolls through games are as much about momentum and flow as they are technique. The dominance becomes self-fulfilling once she wins a few games, and she and her opponent both feel like they know what’s coming next, so the starts and ends of points become more inevitable; what happens in between is less important.

    Additionally, Swiatek is not a player who eases into tournaments — she often racks up thumping wins early on, which although they are theoretically against weaker opponents, still send out a message to her rivals and make her even more ominous as she moves through a draw.


    Swiatek’s remodelled serve has made her even more of a threat (Tim Clayton/Corbis via Getty Images)

    One of Swiatek’s predecessors as world No 1, Naomi Osaka, who lost 6-4, 6-0 when the pair last met two years ago, says it’s “incredible” how Swiatek can keep delivering point after point, week after week: “It’s something that I honestly can’t fathom from back when I was No 1 for like five seconds.”

    “It’s her ability to play one point at a time that puts a lot of pressure on her opponents,” says two-time Australian Open champion Azarenka, who has lost 6-4, 6-0 and 6-4, 6-1 to Swiatek in their two most recent meetings. “Not many people can figure it out.”

    Keys, who has beaten Swiatek previously but has also suffered a 6-1, 6-0 defeat on top of those recent losses, agrees: “Her intensity is basically unmatched by anyone else. She’s on you every single point.”

    Sofia Kenin, the 2020 Australian Open champion who was beaten 6-4, 6-1 by Swiatek in that year’s French Open final, describes her as “super intense”. During that run at Roland Garros four years ago, Swiatek won a breadstick set in six of her seven matches.


    Swiatek’s win over Kenin was her first Grand Slam title (Martin Bureau/AFP via Getty Images)

    This psychological torture doesn’t stop when they get off the court.

    Swiatek’s opponents — and would-be opponents as draws unfold — find themselves in a vicious cycle: the more bagel sets she wins, the more they fear them, and the more likely they become.

    Players are actively having to try to block out this reputation she has when preparing to face her.

    “I think if you start thinking, ‘Ah, maybe I’m gonna get a 6-0 from Iga’, then you’ll probably end up getting one,” three-time Grand Slam finalist Ons Jabeur, who lost the pair’s most recent meeting 6-1, 6-2, told The Athletic this week. “Getting that kind of karma.

    “Not thinking like that is the most important thing. She’s such an amazing player, but you should always think about yourself and not get into that mindset.”


    Swiatek’s relentlessness creates an aura that her opponents sometimes struggle to handle (Sarah Stier/Getty Images)

    This is easier said than done.

    Her opponents have a hard enough time managing their mental state before accounting for the fact that Swiatek is a master of diagnosing it from the other end of the court, feeding off it, and taking their mind as much as their body. She is an elite problem solver, having been a gifted mathematician at school; once she has figured a player out, there is very little they can do.

    Gauff, who has lost 10 of her 11 meetings with Swiatek (including 6-1, 6-3 in the French Open final two years ago) and has been bagelled by her three times, agrees: “When you’re playing her, you shouldn’t worry about the results in the previous matches, because every day is a new match and a new opportunity. I think if you play her thinking about her results, then you probably (already) lost the match.

    “I just approach every match as a clean slate. I think it’s even more important when you’re playing against somebody who has done well in the past, just because you don’t want that to affect how you play.”

    How hard is that to do?

    “For me, not that hard,” Gauff says, “just because I feel like in the past, with the way my career has gone, I played a lot of big names early. I think I just got used to separating the name from, I guess, the match. So for me, it’s not that difficult. Obviously, playing Iga herself is difficult. But I guess that aspect doesn’t affect me when I’m playing her.”

    Rybakina, who has a 4-2 winning record against Swiatek, says it’s about being focused for every single point: “You have to constantly be saying to yourself what you have to do.”

    To try to crack the code though, we turn to Jelena Ostapenko — the all-or-nothing Latvian who has an astonishing 4-0 winning record against Swiatek. How does she not only avoid getting bagelled by Swiatek, but actually find a way to beat her every time?

    “That’s my top secret,” Ostapenko replies, with a grin. “I’m not going to say anything.”

    OK, but how hard is it to live with her when she gets going? “That’s my secret,” she repeats.

    Time to put the bagel slicer away.

    And even if Ostapenko did reveal her secrets, knowing what to do to stop Swiatek is one thing; pulling it off under pressure is quite another.

    As tennis turns to Paris for this year’s French Open, Iga’s Bakery arrives in the viennoiserie capital of the world very much open for business.

    (Top photos: Patrick Smith; Clive Brunskill/Getty Images; design: John Bradford)

    [ad_2]

    The New York Times

    Source link

  • What do you think of Scott Foster after reading this?

    What do you think of Scott Foster after reading this?

    [ad_1]

    When he was a cocksure 25-year-old, on the fast track to officiating big-time college basketball, Scott Foster was summoned for a sit-down with his dad.

    They met at a bar, and his father, Dickie, brought along a family friend with experience in high-level sports. They were concerned about Foster, who was mulling a daring career move. It was 1992, and he had been offered a job in the Continental Basketball Association, then a training ground for the NBA, making $95 a game. But to do so, he would have to forgo his schedule — and career path — of officiating Division I games, which at the time were paying him $250 a game. His dad and friend couldn’t see the logic of accepting less money, less exposure and less stability.

    His dad’s word carried a lot of weight, not just with Foster, but all around Maryland’s Montgomery County. Dickie Foster was a decorated assistant fire chief, an accomplished softball player and the pulse of the frequent parties at the Foster house. As people splashed in their pool, and his dad grilled meats, Foster says he can remember being cornered by firefighters passionately telling him stories about his dad’s heroics, his dad’s leadership and how much his dad meant to them.

    “The only job cooler than a firefighter in my neighborhood growing up was Major League Baseball player,” Foster said. “So he was a big deal.”

    But on this day at the bar, as his dad addressed Foster’s new job offer, Dickie Foster used words like “pipe dream” and “one-in-a-million” and “few-and-far between.” Foster remembers his dad’s final words on the matter: “Not everyone can be Michael Jordan.”

    “But …” Foster remembers telling his dad, “what if I am the Michael Jordan of officiating?”

    Today, Foster insists he said that in jest. But it is significant to note that more than 30 years later, he remembered that scene, and that line, enough to retell it. And it’s significant to note that more than 30 years later, Foster has ascended to Jordanesque stature among NBA referees.

    The NBA employs 74 officials, and none can boast a résumé more impressive than Foster’s: he is the active career leader in playoff games (252, through May 19), NBA Finals games (24) and consecutive years officiating in the finals (16 and counting). As this season’s playoffs head toward the conference finals, Foster remains at the forefront with the most playoff assignments.

    Many fans, players and coaches, however, have a different assessment of his work.

    One NBA head coach, who requested anonymity for fear of retribution in future games, said he considers Foster among the worst of NBA referees, citing his arrogance, his unwillingness to listen and his tendency to incite, rather than defuse, conflict.

    Some players, most notably stars Chris Paul and James Harden, have publicly criticized Foster, calling him rude and arrogant while suggesting he holds grudges. Paul, who served as the players’ union president from 2013 to ’21, has gone as far to say, multiple times, that Foster makes his games “personal.”

    And there is an undercurrent of mistrust because of Foster’s ties with Tim Donaghy, the former NBA referee who went to prison for his involvement in a betting scandal.

    The gap between how Foster is viewed by some players and coaches, and how the league sees him, highlights an issue that has plagued the NBA for years and sharply escalated this season: the quality and consistency of the league’s officiating. The league this season levied $765,000 in fines to players and coaches for criticism and/or inappropriate conduct toward officials, up from the $385,000 fined last season. Postgame news conferences are often as notable for coaches’ denunciations of the referees as for commentary about the players.

    Foster’s polarizing status derives from two of his definitive traits: His accuracy in calling a game and what is viewed as an unpleasant bedside manner. It has led to a complicated legacy, one that confuses and pains him.

    “I would love it if I could be a cross between Joe Crawford, who was a strong referee, and Dick Bavetta, who was a beloved referee … but right now, that is not possible,” Foster said.


    Scott Foster (right) celebrates with his mom, Pam, and dad, Dickie, after working a game as a rookie in December 1994. His dad is wearing the first referee jacket issued to Scott. (Courtesy of Scott Foster)

    Tommy Foster estimates he was 14 when he and his friends happened upon his older brother, standing in front of a mirror. The neighborhood kids all looked up to Scott, who was four years older. Tommy calls his oldest brother his “protector” and the “leader of the family,” but on this day, the group of teenagers couldn’t believe their eyes.

    There was Foster, in front of the mirror, practicing the nuances of his latest job: basketball referee. Every time he blew his whistle, he would practice a different signal. (Whistle) … raised hand for a foul … (whistle) … a rolling of the arms for travel … (whistle) … rigidly placing his hands on his hips for a blocking foul. Tommy and his friends were gobsmacked.

    “We were like … ‘You’re a weirdo,’” Tommy said. “‘Get out of the mirror, psycho.’”

    Foster was 18, and beginning to look at officiating as more than just a way to make spending money. He first put a whistle in his mouth when he was in high school. He coached both of his younger brothers, Tommy and David, and a requirement at the Montgomery Rec Center was for coaches to stay after their game and referee the next contest. He says he still remembers his first correct call in one of those youth games, a baseline drive that was disrupted by too much contact from the defender. The sequence of blowing the whistle, raising his fist and reporting the foul to the scorer’s table gave him a feeling of accomplishment.

    “To do all that, it felt good,” Foster said. “So I said, ‘I want to do this all the time.’”

    In retrospect, Tommy says it makes sense that his oldest brother went into officiating. Ever since they were kids, Scott was the one who upheld the sanctity of the Candlewood Park neighborhood games in Derwood, Md. Whether the kids were playing Wiffle ball, football or basketball, Tommy said Scott’s words held weight not only because he was the oldest, but also because he was the most honest.

    “I was a cheating little s—,” Tommy said. “I just always wanted to win. And because I was the youngest, I was always on my brother’s team. So there would be times like, even though I knew I only got one foot in bounds on a catch (in football), I would argue that I got both feet in. And we would go on and on, until Scott would come in and be like, ‘We’re not cheating here. Your guys’ ball.’ His integrity … he always wanted to do the right thing.”

    Foster’s dedication to officiating at such an early age was consistent with his work ethic growing up. At 16, he bought a red 1967 Ford pickup for $250. It had a rusted bed, three-on-the-tree transmission and a tailgate that only Foster knew how to close. The truck came in handy when he took to cutting neighbors’ lawns. Soon, he was canvasing more customers, and with the added income he bought a trailer and more mowers. Then he added biweekly trash disposal to his offerings. Foster’s Maintenance was born. At its height, Foster’s Maintenance had 25 residential customers, seven banks and a memorable reprimand from the Magruder High School office.

    The school parking lot was once littered with garbage, courtesy of crows that had raided Foster’s pickup bed.

    The crows ended his practice of waiting until after school to dump his customers’ trash, but it wasn’t until he was 18 that he passed the business down to his middle brother, David, who is three years younger.

    “It was the day I reached into a trash can and came out with a hand soiled by a baby diaper,” Foster said. “Later in the day, I took a load to the dump and maggots got all over my legs. That was my official thought of, ‘I should go to college.’”

    He went to the University of Maryland and attended basketball games at Cole Field House not so much to watch the players but rather the mannerisms and mechanics of legendary ACC referees Lenny Wirtz and John Moreau. He also went to catch glimpses of Paula, the cheerleader he would later marry. It was 1988, and as he worked high school games in Washington D.C., he dreamed of one day officiating one of college basketball’s most famed matchups: Duke versus North Carolina.

    Little did Foster know, but once he decided to adopt a whistle as his trade, there would be worse days ahead than baby diapers and maggots, and bigger games on the horizon than Duke versus North Carolina.


    In his perfect world, Foster imagines being anonymous. Nobody knows him, nobody has even heard of him. But he lost that privilege in 1996, his second NBA season.

    While working his first nationally televised game, Foster ejected Lakers star Magic Johnson for bumping him, earning Johnson a three-game suspension and a $10,000 fine. Famed Lakers fan Jack Nicholson went onto the court and gave Foster the choke sign — two hands around the throat. Announcer Bob Costas analyzed the ejection at halftime.

    “It was like Kennedy got assassinated again,” Foster said. “It was brutal. That was probably the first time people heard my name … but it’s not like I said ‘Thank god, that put me on the map.’ The last thing I wanted was to be the lead on SportsCenter and CNN news.”

    It was a referee’s nightmare: he had become part of the story.

    “You never want to be known,” Foster said. “Everybody thinks I love the spotlight, and says, ‘We didn’t come here to see you’ and I’m like, ‘I know. I get it. I don’t want you to come see me. I’m not worth seeing, to be honest with you.’”

    Yet, Foster has had a difficult time avoiding attention. Since the Magic ejection, he has weathered a confrontation in an arena garage, an FBI investigation, two NBA investigations and a list of what detractors say are quick technical fouls, vindictive whistles and arrogant indifference — all delivered with a look as if he just encountered another soiled diaper.

    The conflicts and confrontations have led to what Foster calls “the noise.” Criticism that he is arrogant. Complaints that he refuses to communicate with players and coaches. Insinuations that he cannot be trusted. And the insistence that he holds grudges.

    He says he can handle “the noise,” in part because it’s part of the job and in part because he is held in the highest regard by his peers. His in-game grading has annually rated him at the top of the profession, according to Monty McCutchen, the head of NBA officials. Referee Tyler Ford, in his ninth NBA season, says Foster is the “elite of the elite.” And Ashley Moyer-Gleich, in her sixth season, said, “Scott isn’t one of the best. Scott is the best.”

    Even the most decorated of the profession, including retired referee Danny Crawford, who officiated in 23 consecutive NBA Finals, say Foster is exceptional.

    “Scott Foster is by far one of the top referees in the game, if not the top referee,” Crawford said. “As far as his personality and people not liking him? It’s because he takes no flack. If you come at him in an unsportsmanlike manner, you are going to pay for it.”

    As much as Foster says he can handle the noise, it became apparent during an extended interview with The Athletic that Foster has been pierced by a trident of accusations. He calls them the “Three Things” and referenced the “Three Things” three times throughout his interview, which was monitored by a communications official for the NBA.

    Foster’s “Three Things” are always in the same order:

    1. The 134 phone calls Foster exchanged with referee Tim Donaghy during a seven-month span when Donaghy was betting on NBA games and providing inside information to bookies.

    2. Friction with Paul, the All-Star guard, which has included veiled accusations by Paul that Foster made things personal in the wake of a postgame encounter in 2015 with Paul’s young son.

    3. A collection of anonymous player polls, one by The Los Angeles Times in 2016 and one by The Athletic in 2023, in which players voted Foster the worst referee in the NBA. In a 2019 poll by The Athletic, players voted Foster the second-worst ref behind Tony Brothers.

    go-deeper

    GO DEEPER

    Anonymous NBA player poll 2024: LeBron or Jordan for GOAT? Most overrated? Finals favorite?

    “People want to grasp onto the negative and use three things that discredit Scott Foster … so now, you can take those three things and basically say, ‘Look at all this proof!’” Foster said. “But anybody who studies and looks at the number of plays I call for this team, and that team, and how fair I am … and basically I think every coach in this league would agree that I have the courage to do what is unpopular, but what is hopefully right.”


    Chris Paul and Scott Foster


    In three of the past four seasons, Scott Foster has officiated only one of Chris Paul’s regular-season games. (Christian Petersen / Getty Images)

    If Magic Johnson first put the spotlight on Scott Foster in 1996, Chris Paul has made sure Foster remains under scrutiny.

    At least four times since 2018, Paul has publicly claimed that Foster is out to get him and the team for which he plays. Paul has voiced a wide-ranging list of complaints — from unprovoked technicals in 2019, to Foster allegedly making inappropriate comments before a 2020 playoff game, to pointing out in 2021 that he had lost 11 consecutive playoffs games in which Foster officiated (a streak that would reach 13 before it ended in 2023). Also, in November, Foster ejected Paul with consecutive technicals at Phoenix. After the game, Paul said Foster years ago was involved in an incident with his son, Chris Paul Jr.

    “We had a situation some years ago, and it’s personal,” Paul said in November. “The league knows, everybody knows, and it’s been a meeting and all that. It’s a situation with my son.”

    The tension stems from an incident on April 28, 2015. That night, Foster officiated Game 5 of the first-round playoff series between Paul’s Clippers and the San Antonio Spurs. The Spurs won 111-107. Although Paul was given a technical in the fourth quarter, it was issued by Josh Tiven, and the game didn’t feature any egregious advantage from a foul or free throw standpoint.

    The Spurs were whistled for five more fouls than the Clippers, and the Clippers attempted five more free throws. Of the 59 fouls called in the game, Foster whistled 23, Tiven 21 and Bill Kennedy 15. Of Foster’s calls, 12 went against the Clippers, including two of Paul’s three personal fouls.

    After the game, Don Vaden, then the NBA’s director of officials, loaded into an SUV with the officiating crew. Vaden said Paul saw them getting into the car, and as Foster started the vehicle to drive out of the arena, Paul positioned himself in the middle of the exit lane, blocking their departure. As he did this, Paul turned his back to the car while holding the hand of his 5-year-old son.

    As Foster idled, unsure what to do, Vaden said he summoned a security guard to ask Paul to move. As the security guard was talking to Paul, Foster tapped his horn, and Paul acted surprised before moving to the side.

    “I got home the next day and was told there were accusations made that I did something unprofessional,” Foster said. “The NBA did an investigation and found there was nothing found that needed to be discussed or anybody talked to. And that was the end of that.”

    Did he ever say something to Paul’s son?

    “Noooo,” Foster said.

    Was there any interaction at all with the son?

    “Nope.”

    The incident remained sensitive enough that a meeting was set up the following season, in the spring at the Clippers’ practice facility. In attendance were Foster, Paul, Paul’s father, then-Clippers coach Doc Rivers and Bob Delaney, a former referee who had moved into NBA management overseeing officials. Delaney could not be reached by The Athletic.

    Paul has three times referenced the meeting in interviews, and in April, when asked by The Athletic about specifics about the meeting, Paul declined to elaborate. He repeated that as an active player, he was unable to say anything about Foster, citing the fear of a fine or retaliation from Foster’s colleagues.

    “I gotta wait … I can’t say nothing,” Paul said.

    Foster acknowledged that he was present at the 2016 meeting and participated in the dialogue with Paul, Paul’s father and Rivers.

    “I was told that meeting was private, and that it would stay private forever, and that’s what I’m sticking to,” Foster said. “The fact that people know about it is too bad. I think it was a good idea. There was probably a small honeymoon period or something like that, and I think it helped as far as trying something.”

    Whatever happened in the meeting, it didn’t resolve the tension.

    In the 2017 playoffs, as the buzzer sounded after Paul’s Clippers lost Game 5 to Utah, Paul faked throwing the ball at Foster, causing Foster to flinch with his hands and legs. Foster said he has no recollection of the incident.

    One year later, Paul would join Houston, and his clashes with Foster would follow.

    During a January 2018 game against Portland, Paul was whistled for a foul by Foster, then approached referee Courtney Kirkland, saying, “That’s Scott … that’s Scott …” Foster overheard the comment and gave him a technical foul.

    “Scott Foster at his finest … just … never fails,” Paul told reporters while shaking his head. Later he added, “There’s history there. But that’s Scott, you know, he ‘The Man.’ That’s who they pay to see.”

    The next season, Paul and Rockets teammate James Harden complained about Foster after a 111-106 loss at the Lakers, in which both fouled out. Of the six fouls administered to each player, Foster called two on Harden and two on Paul. Foster also gave Paul and Rockets coach Mike D’Antoni technical fouls with 33 seconds remaining.

    “Scott Foster, man,” Harden said after the game. “I never talk about the officiating, but just rude and arrogant. I mean, you aren’t able to talk to him throughout the course of a game, and it’s like how do you build that relationship with officials?”

    When asked if he thought Foster was making it personal, Harden was emphatic.

    “Yeah, for sure,” he said. “For sure it’s personal. For sure. Like, I don’t think he should even be able to officiate our games anymore, honestly.”

    Paul was more reserved but exasperated.

    “Uh, I mean, I don’t know what else to do,” Paul told reporters. “Met with the league with him before and all this stuff … I don’t know what else to do.”

    Foster insists the public criticism from Paul, Harden or any player does not affect the way he calls games. Throughout questions about Paul, Foster was reserved and composed, and his voice never changed in volume or octave.

    “I was hoping all this would all go away that day, the day of the meeting,” Foster said.

    In 2020, Paul alluded that Foster made an inappropriate comment to him before his Game 7 playoff game. ESPN reported that Paul said Foster made a point to tell him he refereed his last Game 7, a loss when Paul was with New Orleans in 2008.

    Foster remembers the interaction differently.

    “During that season I had, in my mind, found some common ground, and pretty good interaction between the two of us,” Foster said. “And in an attempt to further build a bridge and find common ground, I mentioned to Chris prior to the game that my first Game 7 I ever worked was that game (in 2008). The conversation seemed like a pleasant exchange among the two of us. I figured all Game 7s are something to remember and cherish, and I just shared that was the first I ever worked.”

    What Foster says bothers him more than anything is the social-media narrative built by “the people with the stats” who have attempted to “build a case” that Foster is against Paul. Paul’s teams are 4-18 in playoff games refereed by Foster; 3-17 in games Paul played. Paul is 73-56 in playoff games not officiated by Foster.

    “I went back and tried to figure out some of these games,” Foster said. “Like, one was a game in New Orleans, I think they were playing Denver, and they lose by like 50 (it was 121-63). Like, in what world can you put that on me?

    “I mean, really? In what world can you put that on me?’


    NBA referee Ashley Moyer-Gleich, pictured with Foster (left) and Curtis Blair, says: “Scott isn’t one of the best. Scott is the best.” (Gary Bassing / NBAE via Getty Images)

    Player and/or team feuds with referees are part of NBA lore.

    Scottie Pippen insisted Hue Hollins was out to get him. Clyde Drexler and Jake O’Donnell were so frosty that O’Donnell once refused to shake hands. Tim Duncan accused Joey Crawford of challenging him to a fight. And Danny Crawford said, “Dallas used to hate my guts,” because the Mavericks once lost 16 of 17 playoff games he officiated (Dallas was 6-17 in playoffs officiated by Crawford).

    “Every era has the referee who everybody hates,” said former NBA referee Bill Spooner, who retired in 2020 after 32 seasons. “But guess what? They are the ones working the big games. Earl Strom, Jake (O’Donnell), Joey Crawford … everybody hated those guys. Same with Scott. But if it’s a big game, and the league wants somebody to run the game, Scott is going to be on it. Because he is a damn good referee.”

    The latest chapter between Foster and Paul — when Paul was ejected in a November game against the Phoenix Suns — is notable because it was the last time the NBA assigned Foster to a game involving Paul’s Warriors. Foster officiated 61 regular season games this season and called the games of all 30 teams, including some teams as many as seven times, and some teams as many as six times. Golden State is the only team Foster officiated once.

    It is the third time in the past four seasons that Foster has officiated only one of Paul’s regular-season games. In the four seasons prior, Foster refereed Paul an average of four games per regular season, including six in 2017-18.

    McCutchen, the league official who oversees referees, acknowledged the friction between Paul and Foster, but he said he would never intentionally keep a referee away from a team because of conflict.

    “Anytime there is some high-level tension, we give it some breathing room,” McCutchen said. “We don’t have a set time on that. What I can tell you is I didn’t tell our scheduler, ‘Don’t give Scott Foster any more Golden State games.’ That I can tell you. If I didn’t trust to assign a referee to a team or a player, then we shouldn’t avoid assigning them to that team, we should fire that referee. Because if you can’t assign every referee with confidence because of an integrity question, then those referees should be fired.”

    McCutchen said the 144-day gap of Foster last working a Golden State game is not unusual. He cited 34 instances this season of an official having 144 or more days between working a team. He also said of 16 crew chiefs, 10 this season either saw a team one or zero times. He said if the Warriors had made the playoffs, “Scott would have seen Golden State.”

    Foster said he merely goes where he is told.

    “Obviously, I noticed I didn’t go back (to a Warriors game),” Foster said. “But there’s been lots of years that I don’t go back to places. But I’m not naive enough to think that there wasn’t some motive, reason.”

    The three former referees interviewed for this article, each no longer under the watchful eye of the league, note that the Paul-Foster feud has been narrated from one side. The NBA largely restricts officials from speaking to the media, so the only vantage of the conflict, they claim, has been through Paul’s lens.

    Spooner, the retired ref with 32 years in the league, said he thinks Paul has been building a calculated campaign against Foster.

    “I’m going to tell you, and I know you are recording me, but I get asked all the time: ‘Who are some of the tough guys, some of the bad guys?’ And when I tell them that Chris Paul, in my 32 years in the league, was one of the biggest a–holes I ever dealt with, they say, ‘Not Rasheed Wallace … or da-da-da?’ Nope. Nothing like (Paul),” Spooner said. “And they are like, ‘Oh, he seems like such a nice guy.’ And I say, ‘Yeah, he’s a great image cultivator.’”

    Foster said he has tried to review how he comes across when he levies fouls and technicals. He said he has never been reprimanded by the NBA, but he and McCutchen noted the two have had discussions about his body language and how his demonstrative and authoritative ways are received by coaches and players.

    “One of the things we teach around here is that calling a technical foul should be the same thing as calling a travel, or a forearm check. We have a standard,” McCutchen said. “If you are ever giving a technical foul with the idea that ‘nobody talks to me that way’ … this has nothing to do with you. The NBA has a standard of what is a good or not a good technical foul. It’s important we hold people to that standard … Scott has really grown to applying the standard now.”

    While Foster has his detractors among NBA coaches and players, he also has the respect of others. Chauncey Billups has experienced Foster from two perspectives: as a Hall of Fame player during his 17-year career and as Portland’s head coach for the past three seasons.

    “I think Scott is an excellent official,” Billups said. “He’s not going to put up with any s—. He’s an old-school guy in the way that I like officials, like Joey Crawford, Steve Javie … they are not going to take nothing, whether you are the best player or a player up from the G League. It’s the same respect given. So I’ve always respected that about him.”

    Billups said he thinks what hurts Foster is his body language and his natural affectation. Billups said Foster often looks aggravated or in a bad mood, and noted he rarely, if ever, smiles. It took years for him to conclude that it’s just Foster’s natural look.

    “If you don’t know him, it looks like there is a level of arrogance with him,” Billups said. “And I’m not going to tell you that I know him well, but I’ve been in enough games with him to know that’s not the case. It’s his look (he chuckles) … seriously, though. But if you don’t know, and you have social media out here, and you look at him, you can just run with that narrative that he is angry and arrogant. He’s not.”

    Spooner said he and other referees teased Foster about his take-no-flack reputation. He remembers hearing Darell Garretson, the former head of referees, telling the troops that they need to be able to adopt a different personality when on the floor.

    “Garretson would say, ‘You have to be willing to go from zero to a—hole in a heartbeat,’” Spooner said. “And I used to joke, ‘Well, you’ve got that part down, Scott.’”

    Some unease about Foster goes beyond his temperament. One player who just completed his sixth NBA season, and who requested anonymity for fear of violating the league’s policy on criticizing officials, said Foster’s friendship with Donaghy, and the 134 phone calls exchanged between the two, is brought up among players. They wonder if Foster was involved in the betting scandal.

    “There’s speculation about that,” the player said.

    This season, that speculation was on display courtesy of Minnesota center Rudy Gobert. He was fined after a regular season game in March and again in the playoffs for making a gesture after being called for a foul: rubbing his forefingers to his thumb, insinuating that money is on the line. In both games, Foster was crew chief.

    “I wouldn’t say it offends me, but it definitely affects me, where I go, ‘Wow, man. Like really?’” Foster said of Gobert’s gesture. “I mean, come on. That’s not what we are about. You’ve got to be kidding me you think that. I just think that has become a symbol of disrespect, or a way you disrespect an official.”

    But there it is. For everyone to see. The No. 1 thing of the “Three Things.”

    “I talk until I’m blue in the face, and either people are going to believe me, or they don’t,” Foster said.


    The voice on the telephone is uneasy, and reluctant to talk. It is a voice from Scott Foster’s past, a voice with which Foster no longer communicates.

    “Does he know that you were calling me?” Tim Donaghy asked. “How come the NBA is letting you do a story on him? They usually don’t allow that …”

    Before Donaghy served a prison sentence for his role in a gambling scheme, he was friends with Foster. Close friends.

    “We were like brothers,” Donaghy said.

    In 2003, Donaghy named Foster the godfather of his daughter, Molly. Shortly after, Foster named Donaghy the godfather of his oldest son, Kyle.

    Today, Donaghy said he has lost touch with his godson. And he has not spoken to Foster since 2007 when Donaghy knew he was about to be arrested and called Foster to tell him he couldn’t play in a golf tournament.

    Donaghy had placed bets on NBA games, including ones in which he officiated, and had provided confidential information, such as player injuries and referee assignments, to bookies. Donaghy pleaded guilty to two felonies: conspiracy to commit wire fraud by denying his employer the intangible right to honest services and conspiracy to transmit wagering information.

    Foster became publicly embroiled in the controversy in 2008 when it was reported that he and Donaghy exchanged 134 phone calls during the time Donaghy was working with his co-conspirators. Many of the calls lasted no longer than two minutes and were placed in the hours before or after games, and some of the calls were made shortly before or after Donaghy spoke to one of his co-conspirators.

    In August 2007, the FBI contacted Foster and interviewed him over the phone.

    “I remember having a conversation with one of the FBI agents, and they said they turned his life upside down,” Donaghy said of Foster. “And they actually felt bad for everything he went through, just because he was associated with me. It obviously didn’t look good, the phone calls didn’t look good, but I can just tell you Scott wasn’t involved in any way, shape or form. I don’t care what anybody says. I know the true story.”

    While the FBI was investigating Foster, the NBA hired former federal prosecutor Lawrence Pedowitz and his law firm to conduct a review of the league’s officiating. The Pedowitz report was 133 pages, with seven devoted to Foster. Pedowitz noted that during the 14-month investigation, Foster provided phone records from December 2006 through June 2008.

    In his report, Pedowitz said Foster and Donaghy exchanged 170 phone calls during the timeframe of Donaghy’s involvement with his co-conspirators. Pedowitz also reported he found that volume wasn’t unusual among NBA referees.

    “That’s how we communicated in 2007,” Foster said. “Anytime somebody wants to discredit me, or question my integrity, they draw this conclusion from this 134-phone-call article… and it’s like, ‘That’s the proof!’ There is no proof. Because it didn’t happen. Today, when people hear anybody called someone 134 times, it’s like ‘Wow! That’s weird.’ Because it is weird. I didn’t have text messaging in 2007. I had a Motorola Razor, which if you wanted to text ‘Yes’ in a text message it was 23 keystrokes or something crazy like that.”

    In conclusion, the Pedowitz report said Foster’s phone records “do not in our view raise concerns about his integrity.”

    Donaghy was sentenced to 15 months in prison, but Foster said he feels like he is the one serving a prison sentence.

    “I never, ever said I wasn’t friends with Tim Donaghy. I was,” Foster said. “But I want everyone to know I had no idea what was going on. (After Donaghy was arrested) it was the lowest morale of our staff, the lowest morale of my life. I lost a friend who I haven’t spoken to since then, not out of anything other than … that’s just how bad it was.”

    Donaghy, who served 11 months, now resides in Florida, where he lives off the rent from 15 properties he bought in 2008 and 2009. He says he still watches the NBA, and he becomes sad when he sees Foster.

    “One of my biggest regrets is that me and him were very, very close,” Donaghy said. “It’s upsetting to me knowing he is getting a lot of s— because of what our relationship was at the time. So, that’s tough … just tough when I think about that relationship. I wasn’t going to call you back, but I’m hoping at some point, when Scott steps away, we can talk. And I can apologize to him. You never know, maybe that friendship can be pieced back together. I’m not sure.”


    Foster has officiated 24 NBA Finals games, more than any other active referee. (Jesse D. Garrabrant / NBAE via Getty Images)

    As his flight was preparing to leave Boston on May 8, Foster bolted to the plane lavatory. He needed to cry.

    By nature, Foster is not emotional, let alone a crier. The last time he was moved to tears was before the 2023-24 season when the NBA referees gathered at their annual referee preseason meeting at a Brooklyn hotel.

    Both times, he cried for the same reason: his father.

    At the referees meeting, Foster was on camera for a promotional video about NBA referees receiving their white jacket, a keepsake given to officials when they work the Finals. The jackets are the holy grail of officiating. Foster has 16 of them, and what brought him to tears was remembering the first one.

    It used to be such a cherished memory, that summer day in 2008 when Foster returned from Game 5 of the Celtics-Lakers Finals and walked down to his father’s Ocean City, Md., beach house with the jacket. For Foster, that first jacket represented a triumph in perseverance, a recognition of excellence, and it came on the heels of the Donaghy investigation, when he was at his lowest. When he presented his father the jacket, he told him he couldn’t have done it without him. In the following years, Dickie Foster wore the white jacket almost every time he left the house.

    That memory for Foster had become heavy. His father was battling dementia, and Foster knew his condition meant the two would never share a moment like that again. As the cameras were rolling, he started bawling.

    Now, eight months later, he was in the plane bathroom, losing it again.

    Around 3 a.m., in the hours after he officiated Boston’s victory over the Cavaliers in Game 1, Foster learned his father had died. Dickie Foster was 79.

    He thought he was prepared for the moment. It had been years since his dad was the vibrant, exuberant, friend-to-all, the one with a constant smile and unmistakable belly laugh. He repeated to Foster in the last couple of years that he was sorry for becoming a burden. Foster assured him he wasn’t.

    Later that morning, as he called his dad’s friends, they all had the same reaction: sorrow but relief. Then, as Foster sat on the plane and delivered the news to one of his dad’s former softball teammates — “the coolest guy in my dad’s group of buddies” — the teammate started crying uncontrollably. Foster had to beeline to the bathroom to hide his emotions.

    Foster began to wonder if he would be able to compose himself for his assignment the next day — Dallas at Oklahoma City. In homage to his father, Foster said missing the game was never a thought or an option. His dad often boasted he never missed a day of work at the fire department.

    “My dad would have been really upset with me if he knew I did that because of his passing,” Foster said.

    As he stood for the national anthem before Game 2 in Oklahoma City, Foster went through his normal routine: saying a prayer for all his family and friends who have passed (his mother died in 2016). He said he was worried he would break down in front of a full arena.

    But then he remembered something his father always preached. Years ago, his father became enthralled with “The Precious Present,” a short story by Spencer Johnson. The story illustrates the value of finding happiness and contentment by living in the moment. His father over the years distributed dozens of copies to friends and family, and hung a sign on his porch that read “Precious Present.”

    Foster blocked it all out … the noise … the three things … his father’s passing. He focused on the present.

    When the anthem finished, Foster was composed and in the moment. He was right where he envisioned that day with his dad at the bar, so many years ago. He was in the NBA, at a big game, with a whistle in his mouth. He was at the top of the game.

    (Photo illustration: Dan Goldfarb / The Athletic; photo: Bart Young / NBAE via Getty Images)

    [ad_2]

    The New York Times

    Source link

  • Does lightning-rod umpire Angel Hernandez deserve his villainous reputation?

    Does lightning-rod umpire Angel Hernandez deserve his villainous reputation?

    [ad_1]

    Standing at second base, Adam Rosales knew. So did the fans watching on TV and the ticket holders in the left-field bleachers. They knew what crew chief umpire Angel Hernandez should have known.

    This was May 8, 2013, the game in which Hernandez became baseball’s most notorious umpire. He’d made many notable calls before this, and he’s certainly had plenty since. But this particular miss did more than any other to establish the current prevailing narrative: That he’s simply bad at his job.

    Rosales, a light-hitting journeyman infielder for the A’s, did the improbable, crushing a game-tying solo homer with two outs in the ninth in Cleveland. The ball clearly ricocheted off a barrier above the yellow line. But it was ruled in play. The homer was obvious to anyone who watched a replay.

    “All of my teammates were saying, ‘Homer, homer!’” Rosales recently recalled. “And then (manager) Bob Melvin’s reaction was pretty telling. The call was made. Obviously it was big.”

    Back in 2013, there was no calling a crew in a downtown New York bunker for an official ruling. The umpires, led by Hernandez, huddled, and then exited the field to look for themselves.

    After a few minutes, Hernandez emerged. He pointed toward second base. Rosales, befuddled, stayed where he was. The A’s never scored the tying run.

    That moment illustrates the two viewpoints out there about Angel Hernandez, the game’s most polarizing and controversial umpire.

    If you ask Hernandez, or those close to him, they’ll point to the cheap and small replay screens that rendered reviews nearly worthless. Plus, there were other umpires in the review — why didn’t they correct it? In this scenario, it was just another chapter in this misunderstood man’s career.

    Then there’s the other perspective: This was obviously a home run, critical to the game, and as crew chief, he should have seen it. Hernandez, even in 2013, had a history of controversy. He had earned no benefit of the doubt. MLB itself said in a court filing years later, during Hernandez’s racial discrimination lawsuit against the league, that this incident, and Hernandez’s inability to move past it, prevented him from getting World Series assignments.

    In this scenario, Hernandez only reinforced the negative perception of him held by many around the sport.

    He has brought much of it on himself over his long career. Like the time he threw the hat of then-Dodgers first base coach Mariano Duncan into the stands following an argument in 2006. Or, in 2001, when he stared down ex-Chicago Bears football player Steve McMichael at a Cubs game after McMichael used the seventh-inning stretch pulpit to criticize Hernandez.

    On their own, these avoidable incidents would be forgotten like the thousands of other ejections or calls that have come and gone. But together, they paint a portrait of an umpire who’s played a major role in establishing his own villainous reputation.

    “I think he’s stuck in, like, a time warp, you know,” Mets broadcaster and former pitcher Ron Darling told The New York Times last year. “He’s stuck being authoritarian in a game that rarely demands it anymore.”

    “Angel is bad,” said then-Rangers manager Ron Washington in 2011. “That’s all there is to it. … I’m gonna get fined for what I told Angel. And they might add to it because of what I said about Angel. But, hey, the truth is the truth.”

    “I don’t understand why he’s doing these games,” former Yankees pitcher CC Sabathia said in 2018 after Hernandez had three calls overturned in one postseason game “…He’s always bad. He’s a bad umpire.”

    “He needs to find another job,” four-time All-Star Ian Kinsler said in August of 2017, “he really does.”

    Those who know Hernandez, and have worked with him, tend to love him. They say he’s genuine, that he checks up on his friends and sends some of them daily religious verses. That he cares about calling the game right, and wishes the vitriolic criticism would dissipate. They point to data that indicates Hernandez is not as bad as his reputation suggests.

    Or at the very least, they view him in a more nuanced light than the meme that he’s become.

    “Managers and umpires are alike,” said soon-to-be Hall of Fame manager Jim Leyland. “You can get out of character a bit when you have a tough situation on the field. I think we all get out of character a little bit. But I’ve always gotten along fine with Angel.”

    But those who only know his calls see an ump with a large and inconsistent strike zone. Someone who makes the game about him. Someone who simply gets calls wrong at far too high a clip.

    With Hernandez, the truth lies somewhere in between.

    Major League Baseball declined an interview request for Hernandez, and declined to comment for this article.

    “Anybody that says he’s the worst umpire in baseball doesn’t know what they’re talking about,” said Joe West, who has umpired more games than anyone ever, and has himself drawn plenty of criticism over the years.

    “He does his job the right way. Does he make mistakes? Yes. But we all do. We’re not perfect. You’re judging him on every pitch. And the scrutiny on him is not fair.”

    Of course, even West understands that he might not be the best person to make Hernandez’s case. “As soon as you write that Joe West says he’s a good umpire,” he said, “you’re going to get all kinds of heat.”


    Angel Hernandez is perhaps the best-known umpire in Major League Baseball — and the most criticized. (Brace Hemmelgarn / Minnesota Twins/Getty Images)

    Hernandez’s family moved from Cuba to Florida when he was 14 months old in the early 1960s. His late father, Angel Hernandez Sr., ran a Little League in Hialeah. At 14 years old, the younger Hernandez played baseball in the Hialeah Koury League, and umpired others when his games finished. At his father’s urging, Hernandez went on to the Bill Kinnamon Umpiring School, where he was the youngest of 134 students. He finished first in the class.

    When he was 20 years old, Hernandez was living out of a suitcase, making $900 a month as he traveled up and down the Florida State League. It was a grind. Each night, he’d ump another game alongside his partner, Joe Loughran.

    The two drove in Loughran’s ’79 Datsun. They shared modest meals and rooms at Ramada Inns. They’d sit by the pool together.

    “There was a real camaraderie there, which was a lucky thing because that’s not always the case,” Loughran said. “Maybe you have a partner who isn’t as friendly or compatible, but that was not an issue.”

    Hernandez did this for more than a decade. He drove up to 30,000 miles each season. He worked winter jobs in construction and security and even had a stint as a disc jockey. He didn’t come from money and didn’t have many fallback options.

    “He was very genuine through and through,” said Loughran, who soon left the profession. “(He) knew how to conduct himself, which is half of what it takes.”

    But even then, Hernandez umpired with a flair that invited blowback. Rex Hudler, now a Royals broadcaster, has told a story about Hernandez ejecting nearly half his team. Players had been chirping at Hernandez, and after he issued a warning to the dugout, they put athletic tape over their mouths to mock him. Hernandez tossed the whole group.

    By the time Hernandez was calling Double-A games across the Deep South, he was accustomed to vitriol from fans, including for reasons that had nothing to do with baseball.

    “I remember my name over the public address, and the shots fans would take. ‘Green card.’ ‘Banana Boat,” Hernandez said in a Miami Herald article. “Those were small hick towns. North Carolina. Alabama. These were not good places to be an umpire named Angel Hernandez.”

    In 1991, he finally got an MLB opportunity. This was his dream, and as Loughran said, he achieved it on “blood and guts.” But once he got to the majors, it didn’t take long for controversy to follow.

    Take the July 1998 game when a red-faced Bobby Valentine, then the Mets manager, ran out of the dugout to scream at Hernandez.

    Valentine claims he knew before the game even started on this July 1998 afternoon that Hernandez would have a big zone. He said he had been told that Hernandez had to catch a flight later that day — the final game before the All-Star break. Valentine’s message to his team that day was to swing, because Hernandez would look for any reason to call you out.

    “He sure as heck doesn’t want to miss the plane,” Valentine recalled recently. “I’m kind of feeling for him in the dugout. You miss the flight, and have to spend a night in Atlanta. Probably miss a vacation.”

    As luck would have it, the game went extras, the Mets battling the division-rival Braves in the 11th inning. Michael Tucker tagged up on a fly ball to left. The ball went to Mike Piazza at the plate, and Tucker was very clearly out.

    That is, to everyone except Hernandez, who called him safe to end the game.

    Valentine acknowledges now that he likes Hernandez as a person. Most of their interactions have been friendly. On that day, Valentine let Hernandez hear it.

    “He didn’t mind telling you, ‘take a f—ing hike. Get out of my face,’ that type of thing,” Valentine said. “Where other guys might stand there and take it until you’re out of breath. He didn’t mind adding color to the situation.”

    It’s not a coincidence that Hernandez often finds himself at the center of it all. He seems to invite it.

    He infamously had a back-and-forth with Bryce Harper last season after Hernandez said the MVP went around on what was clearly a check swing.

    Harper was incensed. But Hernandez appeared to respond by telling him, “You’ll see” — a cocky retort when the video would later show that it was, in fact, Hernandez who was wrong.

    “It’s just bad. Just all around,” Harper later told the local media. “Angel in the middle of something again. Every year. It’s the same story. Same thing.”

    In 2020, there was a similar check swing controversy. Hernandez ruled that Yankees first baseman Mike Ford went around. Then he called him out on strikes on a pitch inside.

    Even in the messiest arguments with umpires, the tone and tenor rarely get personal. But Hernandez seems to engender a different type of fight.

    “That’s f—ing bull—-,” then-Yankees third-base coach Phil Nevin yelled. “We all know you don’t want to be here anyway.”

    Plenty of fans might understand why Nevin would feel that way. When Hernandez is behind the plate, it can seem that anything might be a strike.

    Early this season, Wyatt Langford watched three consecutive J.P. France pitches land well off the outside corner — deep into the lefty batter’s box. None of the pitches to the Rangers rookie resembled a strike.

    “You have got to be kidding me,” said Dave Raymond, the incensed Texas broadcaster. “What in the world?”


    When it comes to egregious calls, it feels as though Hernandez is the biggest culprit. But is he the game’s worst umpire? The answer to that, statistically, is no.

    According to Dylan Yep, who founded and runs Umpire Auditor since 2014, he’s ranked as the 60th to 70th best umpire, out of 85-to-90, in any given season.

    “It sort of becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy, and there’s also a lot of confirmation bias,” Yep said. “When he does make a mistake, everyone is immediately tweeting about it. Everybody is tagging me. If I’m not tweeting something about it, there are a dozen other baseball accounts that will.

    “Every single thing he does is scrutinized and then spread across the internet in a matter of 30 seconds.”

    Even on April 12, the night he called Langford out on strikes, two other umpires had less accurate games behind the plate. Only Hernandez became a laughingstock on social media.

    Yep finds Hernandez’s performances to be almost inexplicable. He’ll call a mostly normal game, Yep said, with the exception of one or two notably odd decisions — which inevitably draw attention his way.

    “He consistently ends up in incredibly odd scenarios,” Yep said, “and he seems to make incorrect calls in bizarre scenarios.”

    Many of his colleagues have come to his defense over the years. After Kinsler made those aforementioned comments in 2017, umpires across the game wore white wristbands as a show of solidarity against the league’s decision not to suspend him.

    Longtime umpire Ted Barrett recently posted a heartfelt defense of Hernandez on Facebook.

    “He is one of the kindest men I have ever known,” Barrett wrote. “His love for his friends is immense, his love for his family is even greater. … His mistakes are magnified and sent out to the world, but his kind deeds are done in private.”

    A confluence of factors have put umpires in a greater spotlight. Replay reviews overturning calls. Strike zone graphics on every broadcast. Independent umpire scorecards on social media, which Hernandez’s defenders contend are not fully accurate.

    It’s all contributed, they argue, to Hernandez being the face of bad umpiring, even if it’s not deserved.

    “He’s very passionate about the job, and very passionate about doing what’s right, frankly,” longtime umpire Dale Scott said. “That’s not true — the perception that he doesn’t care. That just doesn’t resonate with me.”

    Still, Hernandez generally does not interact well in arguments. And his actions, including quick or haphazard ejections, don’t de-escalate those situations.

    These interactions were likely a significant reason Hernandez lost the lawsuit that he filed against MLB in 2017. He alleged that he was passed over for a crew chief position and desirable postseason assignments because of his race.

    The basis for the suit was a belief that MLB’s executive VP for baseball operations Joe Torre had a vendetta against Hernandez. The suit also pointed to a lack of diversity in crew chief positions, and attorneys cited damaging deposition testimony from MLB director of umpiring Randy Marsh, who spoke about recruiting minority umpires to the profession. “The problem is, yeah, they want the job,” Marsh said, “but they want to be in the big leagues tomorrow, and they don’t want to go through all of that.”

    MLB contended in its response that “Hernandez has been quick to eject managers, which inflames on-field tensions, rather than issue warnings that potentially could defuse those situations. Hernandez has also failed to communicate with other umpires on his crew, which has resulted in confusion on the field and unnecessary game delays.”

    The league also said his internal evaluations consistently said he was “attempting to put himself in the spotlight.”

    Essentially, MLB contended that Hernandez wasn’t equipped to handle a promotion — and because of that, and only that, he wasn’t promoted. A United States district judge agreed and granted a summary judgment in MLB’s favor.

    Hernandez’s lawyer, Kevin Murphy, says the lawsuit still led to positive developments in the commissioner’s office. “That’s another thing that Angel can keep in his heart,” Murphy said. “The changes, not only with getting more opportunities for minority umpires. But he changed the commissioner’s office. Nobody’s going to give him credit for that.”

    Despite its criticism of Hernandez, the league has almost no recourse to fire him, or any other umpire it feels is underperforming. The union is powerful. There are mechanisms in place, such as improvement courses, which can be required to help address deficiencies.

    Even Hernandez’s performance reviews, though, paint a conflicting portrait. From 2002 to 2010, according to court documents, Hernandez received “meets standard” or “exceeds standard” ratings in all components of his performance evaluations from the league. From 2011-16, Hernandez received only one “does not meet” rating.

    His 2016 year-end evaluation, however, did hint at the oddities that can accompany Hernandez’s umpiring. “You seem to miss calls in bunches,” the league advised Hernandez.

    But for better or worse, the league and its fans are stuck with Hernandez for as long as he wants the job.


    Criticism comes with the job, but players haven been particular vocal in expressing their issues with Hernandez (right, with the Phillies’ Kyle Schwarber in 2022). (Bill Streicher / USA Today Sports)

    Hernandez isn’t on social media. By all accounts, he doesn’t pay much attention to the perpetual flow of frustration directed his way.

    But, according to his lawyer, there are people close to Hernandez who feel the impact.

    “What hurts him the most,” Murphy said, “is the pain that his two daughters and his wife go through when they know it’s so unbelievably undeserved.”

    “I think it bothers him that his family has to put up with it,” West said. “He’s such a strong-character person; he doesn’t let the media affect him.”

    It’s not only other umpires who have defended him. Take Homer Bailey, the former Reds pitcher who threw a no-hitter in 2012. Hernandez, the third-base umpire that night, asked for some signed baseballs following Bailey’s achievement. Bailey agreed, without issue. Hernandez would receive his one “does not meet” rating on his year-end evaluation because of it. But Bailey said the entire thing was innocuous.

    “He didn’t ask for more than any of the other umpires,” Bailey said. “…Maybe there are some things he could do on his end to kind of tamp it down. But there’s also some things that get blown out of proportion.”

    Hernandez is a public figure in a major professional sport, and criticism is baked into officiating. But how much of it is justified?

    Leyland will turn 80 years old this year — just a few months after his formal Hall of Fame induction. His interactions with Hernandez are long in the past.

    With that age, and those 22 years as a skipper, has come some perspective.

    “A manager, half the games, he has the home crowd behind him. Normally, you’ve got a home base,” Leyland said. “The umpire doesn’t have a home base. He’s a stranger. He’s on the road every night. He doesn’t have a hometown.

    “We all know they miss calls. But we also all know that when you look at all the calls that are made in a baseball season by the umpires, they’re goddamn good. They’re really good at what they do.”

    Leyland has found what so few others have been able to: A nuanced perspective on Hernandez.

    For almost everyone else, that seems to be impossible.

    The Athletic’s Chad Jennings contributed to this story

    (Top image: Sean Reilly / The Athletic; Photos: Jamie Squire / Getty Images; Jason O. Watson / Getty Images; Tom Szczerbowski / Getty Images)

    [ad_2]

    The New York Times

    Source link

  • Rivals.com  –  Four-star cornerback Adonyss Currie breaks down SEC pledge

    Rivals.com – Four-star cornerback Adonyss Currie breaks down SEC pledge

    [ad_1]









    Four-star Cornerback Adonyss Currie Breaks Down SEC Pledge – Rivals.com














    Texas A&M coach Mike Elko and especially position coach Jordan Peterson showed Adonyss Currie a lot of love and attention through the recruiting process.And when the four-star cornerback from Lanca…

    You must be a member to read the full article. Subscribe now for instant access to all premium content.


    • icn-check-mark Created with Sketch.

      Members-only forums


    • icn-check-mark Created with Sketch.

      Predict prospect commits with FanFutureCast


    • icn-check-mark Created with Sketch.

      Exclusive highlights and interviews


    • icn-check-mark Created with Sketch.

      Exclusive coverage of Rivals Camp Series


    • icn-check-mark Created with Sketch.

      Breaking recruiting news

    Certain Data by Sportradar

    © 2024 Yahoo. All rights reserved.

    [ad_2]

    Adam Gorney, National Recruiting Director

    Source link

  • Saints make Superdome renovation payment and diffuse public standoff with state officials

    Saints make Superdome renovation payment and diffuse public standoff with state officials

    [ad_1]

    NEW ORLEANS — New Orleans Saints made an $11.4 million payment toward Superdome renovations Friday, diffusing a public standoff between the NFL club and state officials who oversee the stadium that will host the next Super Bowl.

    Announcement of the payment by the club and the Louisiana Stadium and Exposition District came hours after Saints president Dennis Lauscha, in comments published on the team’s website, decried “disingenuous and unprofessional” conduct by the state commission that oversees the Superdome.

    Lauscha also confirmed that the team’s decision to hold back payments since last December stemmed from dissatisfaction over the state’s posture in parallel negotiations toward a long-term Superdome lease.

    The LSED “was informed that material progress toward a long-term lease had to be made or payments would be stopped,” Lauscha said on the team website. “As of late of last week, sufficient progress was not made and the Saints reached out to tell them, yet again, that payments would not be made until significant progress on the lease was accomplished.”

    But late Friday afternoon, officials said payment was made after Lauscha and LSED board chairman Rob Vossbein had a “productive call.”

    The dispute became public during an LSED board meeting Wednesday, when commission board members were informed by staff that the Saints were behind on payments toward Superdome renovations that are scheduled for completion this summer.

    The NFL club issued a statement later that day in which it said it remained prepared to pay its share, but not until it received then-unspecified “documentation.” LSED officials responded that they “do not understand” what documentation the Saints need because not a single work invoice related to renovations had been disputed.

    Lauscha said it was “absolutely disingenuous and unprofessional for the LSED to make a statement that they are unaware of what we are looking for.”

    The LSED statement did, however, reference the lease negotiations.

    “That is a completely separate and independent agreement,” the LSED stated. “There is no legal basis to withhold payments under the Superdome Renovation Project Development Agreement based on efforts to negotiate a longer-term extension.”

    The amount of money at issue was small relative to the nearly $550 million scope of the renovation project, which has grown from an initial $450 million plan formally approved in 2019. But further delay by the team in paying could have caused cash flow problems and hinder the LSED’s ability to complete remaining work — unless the state quickly found an additional funding source as a stop-gap measure until the impasse was resolved.

    Lauscha said Louisiana Gov. Jeff Landry called Saints owner Gayle Benson on Thursday night “and they had a wonderful conversation.”

    Following the call, an LSED attorney “reached out to us stating that they want to meet with us to resolve our impasse and we welcome that,” Lauscha said.

    Lauscha said the Saints became concerned about the tenor of lease negotiations when the LSED and the company the state pays to manage the dome, ASM Global, told the club they “wanted to discuss rolling back some of the rights granted to the team in the current lease.”

    “This was clearly not what was agreed to and shocking, to say the least, given how fundamental those rights were to making the partnership function as designed,” Lauscha said without specifying which “rights” were targeted by state negotiators. “Given that threat, we told ASM and the LSED that we would have no choice but to hold up construction payments until they agreed to live up to the commitments they made to preserving our rights.”

    Currently, the Saints hold various rights to revenue streams generated by the dome, such as those derived from naming rights deals and advertising space.

    The LSED declined to comment further on the matter Friday, standing by previous statements, spokesman Mike Hoss said.

    Most renovations have been completed. About $58 million in work remains, with the Saints responsible for about $41 million. The Saints have committed to spending about $200 million toward Superdome renovations, the team statement said.

    The project has included overhauls of stadium entrances, concourses and kitchens; installation of soaring new escalators; and the replacement of older ramps with staircases and elevators. Much of it was completed even before last season.

    Remaining work is expected to be completed ahead of the start of the NFL season, nearly six months before the nearly 50-year-old stadium hosts the Super Bowl on Feb. 9.

    ___

    AP NFL: https://apnews.com/hub/NFL

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Rivals.com  –  Defensive lineman Tommy Rupley announces his commitment to Duke

    Rivals.com – Defensive lineman Tommy Rupley announces his commitment to Duke

    [ad_1]









    Defensive Lineman Tommy Rupley Announces His Commitment To Duke – Rivals.com















    Defensive lineman Tommy Rupley has announced his commitment to Duke. The Belmont (Mass.) Belmont Hill standout chose the Blue Devils over Boston College, Penn State, Virginia, and Northwestern.

    Rupley breaks down his decision in the video above.

    Certain Data by Sportradar

    © 2024 Yahoo. All rights reserved.

    [ad_2]

    Adam Friedman, National Recruiting Analyst

    Source link

  • SB or bust? Lions’ Campbell unsure ‘what bust is’

    SB or bust? Lions’ Campbell unsure ‘what bust is’

    [ad_1]

    ALLEN PARK, Mich. — Padded practices haven’t even started yet, but with OTAs beginning this week and mandatory minicamp set for June 4, Lions head coach Dan Campbell has his sights set on bringing a Super Bowl to Detroit.

    “I don’t see bust. I see Super Bowl,” Campbell said Thursday. “I don’t know what bust is.”

    Detroit currently has the fourth-best odds (+1100) to win a championship, according to ESPN BET, after enjoying a storybook run in 2023 that ended in the NFC Championship Game against the San Francisco 49ers.

    This offseason, the team has revamped its defense by signing former Cincinnati Bengals defensive tackle DJ Reader along with drafting rookie cornerbacks Terrion Arnold (first round) and Ennis Rakestraw Jr. (second round) in addition to a plethora of other moves.

    “You’ve got to set yourself up no different than last year, certain things you gotta do to really make that valid and to make that a reality,” Campbell said about the team’s championship ambitions. “Ultimately, that’s what we want to do. Now to do that you better win the division.

    “You’ve got to give yourself the best odds you can. You need to win the division; you need best seeding you can possibly do,” he said. “OK, well how do you do that? You’ve got to start with where we’re at now. You’ve got to go back to work. You’ve got to do all the little things, which to this point, our guys have done.”

    The Lions have also secured their foundational pieces by agreeing to offseason extensions for Campbell and general manager Brad Holmes, as well as massive four-year deals with veteran quarterback Jared Goff, All-Pro wide receiver Amon-Ra St. Brown and All-Pro offensive tackle Penei Sewell that’ll align them together for the future.

    Despite interviewing for numerous head-coaching vacancies, the Lions were also able to keep offensive coordinator Ben Johnson and defensive coordinator Aaron Glenn together for another season, which could be an underrated aspect to their success.

    Detroit is coming off a season where they clinched their first division crown since 1993.

    “I think it’s really beneficial for the players because you hear that same voice, and consistency has always been best in this league in my opinion, which you don’t see a lot,” Glenn said. “That could be other coaches leaving for other jobs, or it could just be sometimes people are there for a year or two and they fire everybody and they’re on to the next, but I think it really benefits the players.”

    [ad_2]

    Eric Woodyard

    Source link