ReportWire

Tag: Human reproduction

  • We’re Nowhere Near Ready to Make Babies in Space, Experts Warn

    [ad_1]

    If humanity truly hopes to colonize the solar system, it must overcome a challenge arguably greater than any technological hurdle: human reproduction beyond Earth. The idea may sound like science fiction, but a group of experts says figuring out how to protect astronauts’ reproductive healthand even make babies in space—is a very real and urgent issue.

    In a report published Tuesday in the journal Reproductive BioMedicine Online, these experts argue that now is the time to build a comprehensive framework governing reproductive health and research in space. As both the distance and duration of human spaceflight missions extend, the hazards of space pose increasing risks to fertility, gamete health, and embryonic development, they say.

    “Although we do not advocate reproduction in space at present, it is essential to prepare for fertility risks as renewed interest in lunar missions and Mars exploration grows,” lead author Giles Palmer, a clinical embryologist and executive director of the International IVF Initiative, told Gizmodo in an email. “Reproduction in space remains a distant prospect, but proactive planning is needed to address the biological, ethical, and health hazards that may arise.”

    The reproductive hazards of spaceflight

    Because the human body evolved here on Earth, it is fine-tuned to operate within the environmental conditions of our home planet. Space is therefore completely incompatible with our biology and physiology.

    Radiation and microgravity are two of the greatest hazards to astronauts’ reproductive health. “Space radiation can damage DNA, disrupt gamete formation, and raise cancer risk, while microgravity interferes with hormonal regulation, gamete quality, and embryonic development,” Palmer explained.

    Other threats inherent to the space environment include toxic dust from lunar or Martian regolith, limited resources, and chemical or microbial contamination within enclosed spacecraft, all of which can harm maternal and fetal health, he added. Being in space can also disrupt astronauts’ circadian rhythms—leading to hormonal imbalances and reduced fertility—and induce psychological stress that might impair reproductive function.

    “Over the long term, prolonged exposure to these conditions may cause cumulative reproductive damage and heritable risks, including epigenetic changes that alter gene expression and potentially affect fertility and the health of future offspring,” Palmer said.

    Charting a safe, ethical path forward

    Before scientists can address these hazards, they need to fill critical knowledge gaps about them. For example, studies in animal models have shown that short-term radiation exposure disrupts menstrual cycles and increases cancer risk, but Palmer’s review found little reliable data from astronauts who returned from long-term space missions.

    While data that was provided by women who flew on NASA’s Space Shuttle missions indicated that subsequent pregnancy rates and complications were largely unaffected, limited data has so far been reported from men and women who flew on longer missions. As such, there is a need for new evidence “to guide diagnostic, preventative, and therapeutic strategies in extraterrestrial environments,” the report’s authors write.

    Future studies should aim to improve our understanding of how space hazards impact various stages of the reproductive process, according to Palmer and his colleagues. This new knowledge will help scientists develop more effective strategies to protect astronauts’ reproductive health, such as radiation shielding, medical countermeasures, and fertility-preservation methods.

    “Advancing assisted reproductive technologies through AI, automation, and non-invasive tools will be key for safe use in space, alongside establishing clear ethical guidelines that prioritize informed consent, transparency, gender equity, and the protection of future offspring,” Palmer said.

    One can’t overstate the importance of these ethical guidelines as humanity expands its reach beyond Earth and progresses toward in-space reproduction. But just to be clear, scientists will not be sending pregnant humans to space for research or any other purpose. Rather, they will rely on simulated environments and non-human models to study the reproductive risks of spaceflight, Palmer explained.

    Still, “entering this new research frontier makes it essential to act now by establishing an international framework and a collective industry ethics review board,” he said. This will not only ensure that in-space reproductive research is conducted safely, responsibly, and transparently, but also safeguard humanity’s future as we work to establish a sustained presence beyond Earth.

    Related: Humans will never colonize Mars

    [ad_2]

    Ellyn Lapointe

    Source link

  • Sunbury woman carried child for California couple suspected of scam

    [ad_1]

    SUNBURY — Sunbury resident Alexa Fasold thought she was helping a childless California couple when she agreed to be a surrogate, but learned they may be part of a nationwide scam before delivering the baby in October.

    The healthy infant boy has been placed with a foster family in Montour County while the FBI and California authorities investigate Silvia Zhang, 38, and Guojun Xuan, 65, the owners of Mark Surrogacy, an Arcadia, Calif.-based agency, who were accused of felony child endangerment and child neglect and later found to have 21 children between the ages of 2 and 13 — mostly toddlers delivered by surrogates — in their home or care.


    This page requires Javascript.

    Javascript is required for you to be able to read premium content. Please enable it in your browser settings.

    kAm%96 492C86D H6C6 =2E6C 5C@AA65[ 3FE E96 49:=5C6? H6C6 C6>@G65 2?5 E96 4@FA=6 C6>2:?D F?56C D4CFE:?J 56DA:E6 +92?8 56?J:?8 :?G@=G6>6?E 😕 9F>2? EC277:4<:?8]k^Am

    kAm“xE D66>D x H2D 2 DFCC@82E6 7@C 4C:>:?2=D[” u2D@=5[ DE:== DEF??65 3J E96 EFC? @7 6G6?ED[ D2:5]k^Am

    kAmu2D@=5[ ae[ 6H ?@E9:?8 23@FE DFCC@824J @C E96 AC6G2=6?46 @7 4@FA=6D DECF88=:?8 H:E9 :?76CE:=:EJ EH@ J62CD 28@ H96? D96 2?5 96C 9FD32?5[ |:4926=[ 3682? E2=<:?8 H:E9 2 }6H y6CD6J 4@FA=6 — H9@ D96 42==65 “7C:6?5D @7 7C:6?5D” — =@@<:?8 7@C 2 H@>2? H:==:?8 E@ 42CCJ 2 49:=5 7@C E96> FD:?8 E96:C :>A=2?E65 688 2?5 DA6C>]k^Am

    kAmu2D@=5 H2D :?EC:8F65 H:E9 E96 :562 7@==@H:?8 96C @H? 9:89C:D< 3:CE9 D6G6? J62CD 28@ H9:49 C6BF:C65 E9C66 DFC86C:6D 😕 E96 E9:C5 EC:>6DE6C]k^Am

    kAm“(6 5:5?’E H2?E >@C6 <:5D 3FE x 5:5 H2?E 2 36EE6C AC68?2?4J DE@CJ[” D96 D2:5[ 255:?8 E92E 96C r9C:DE:2? 72:E9 2=D@ 8F:565 96C 564:D:@? E@ 96=A @E96CD]k^Am

    kAm%96 u2D@=5D 28C665 E@ H@C< H:E9 E96 }6H y6CD6J 4@FA=6] u2D@=5 F?56CH6?E ADJ49@=@8:42= 2?5 A9JD:42= E6DE:?8 2?5 H2D 4=62C65 E@ 36 2 DFCC@82E6[ 3FE E96 }6H y6CD6J 4@FA=6’D DFCC@824J 286?4J 564=:?65 E@ H@C< H:E9 96C 5F6 E@ 96C 7:CDE 9:89C:D< AC68?2?4J]k^Am

    kAm“(6 C6DA64E65 E92E 2?5 E96J 7@F?5 2 8C62E DFCC@82E6[” u2D@=5 D2:5[ 255:?8 E96 }6H y6CD6J 4@FA=6 6?4@FC2865 96C E@ 7:?5 2?@E96C 4@FA=6 😕 ?665]k^Am

    kAmp3@FE `h A6C46?E @7 &]$] >2CC:65 4@FA=6D DECF88=6 H:E9 :?76CE:=:EJ 2?5 >2?J EFC? E@ DFCC@824J[ H9:49[ 244@C5:?8 E@ E96 rsr[ 92D C6DF=E65 😕 2 C:D6 😕 86DE2E:@?2= 42CC:6CD C646:G:?8 EC2?DA=2?E65 6>3CJ@D 7C@> b[a_a 😕 a_`a E@ g[gea 😕 a_a`]k^Am

    kAm%96 u2D@=5D ;@:?65 2 u2463@@< A286 7@C :?76CE:=6 4@FA=6D D66<:?8 2 86DE2E:@?2= 42CC:6C 2?5 A@E6?E:2= DFCC@82E6D D66<:?8 4@FA=6D]k^Am

    kAm“%96C6 2C6 D@ >2?J A6@A=6 =@@<:?8 7@C 2 DFCC@82E6 2?5 x H2D C625:?8 2== E96D6 DF446DD DE@C:6D[” u2D@=5 D2:5]k^Am

    kAmp7E6C A@DE:?8 96C @H? DE@CJ @?=:?6[ u2D@=5 H2D 4@?E24E65 3J E96 r2=:7@C?:232D65 |2C< $FCC@824J]k^Am

    kAm“%96J 2D<65 H92E H6 H6C6 =@@<:?8 7@C[ 2?5 H6 D2:5 H6 5:5?’E H2?E 2 C6=2E:@?D9:A H:E9 E96 A2C6?ED[” D96 D2:5 @7 E96:C 56D:C6 E@ AC@G:56 2 962=E9J 49:=5 E@ 2? :?76CE:=6 4@FA=6 H:E9 ?@ DEC:?8D 2EE24965] %96 286?4J D2:5 E96 A2C6?ED 76=E E96 D2>6]k^Am

    kAmu2D@=5 2?5 96C 9FD32?5 5:5 5F6 5:=:86?46 2?5 9:C65 2 }6H y6CD6J =2H 7:C> E@ C6G:6H E96 4@?EC24E E96J D:8?65 H:E9 |2C< $FCC@824J] “(6 4964<65 @FE E96 286?4J H63D:E6 2?5 E96 255C6DD 2?5 H96? H6 42==65 2?5 8@E 2 C62= A6CD@? H9@ 2?DH6C65 @FC BF6DE:@?D :E 62D65 @FC >:?5D[” D96 D2:5] “}@E9:?8 D66>65 @55] %96C6 H6C6 ?@ C65 7=28D]”k^Am

    kAmqJ =2E6 DF>>6C a_ac[ E96 u2D@=5D H6C6 @? 2? 2:CA=2?6 962565 7@C 2 7:G652J[ A2:5 DE2J 😕 r2=:7@C?:2 H96C6 p=6I2 u2D@=5 F?56CH6?E 2? 6>3CJ@ EC2?DA=2?E]k^Am

    kAm“xE H2D 2? 62DJ AC@465FC6[ 3FE x H2?E65 E@ >66E E96> E@ >2<6 E96 AC@46DD >@C6 C62= 7@C FD[” D2:5 u2D@=5[ H9@ 2D<65 E@ >66E H:E9 E96 4@FA=6 H9@D6 323J D96 H@F=5 36 42CCJ:?8] “%96J H6C6 DFA6C ?:46 2?5 E@=5 FD E96J 5:5?’E 92G6 2?J 49:=5C6?]”k^Am

    [ad_2]

    By Marcia Moore mmoore@dailyitem.com

    Source link

  • Sunbury woman carried child for California couple suspected of scam

    [ad_1]

    SUNBURY — Sunbury resident Alexa Fasold thought she was helping a childless California couple when she agreed to be a surrogate, but learned they may be part of a nationwide scam before delivering the baby in October.

    The healthy infant boy has been placed with a foster family in Montour County while the FBI and California authorities investigate Silvia Zhang, 38, and Guojun Xuan, 65, the owners of Mark Surrogacy, an Arcadia, Calif.-based agency, who were accused of felony child endangerment and child neglect and later found to have 21 children between the ages of 2 and 13 — mostly toddlers delivered by surrogates — in their home or care.

    This page requires Javascript.

    Javascript is required for you to be able to read premium content. Please enable it in your browser settings.

    kAm%96 492C86D H6C6 =2E6C 5C@AA65[ 3FE E96 49:=5C6? H6C6 C6>@G65 2?5 E96 4@FA=6 C6>2:?D F?56C D4CFE:?J 56DA:E6 +92?8 56?J:?8 :?G@=G6>6?E 😕 9F>2? EC277:4<:?8]k^Am

    kAm“xE D66>D x H2D 2 DFCC@82E6 7@C 4C:>:?2=D[” u2D@=5[ DE:== DEF??65 3J E96 EFC? @7 6G6?ED[ D2:5]k^Am

    kAmu2D@=5[ ae[ 2? H:==:?8 E@ 42CCJ 2 49:=5 7@C E96> FD:?8 E96:C :>A=2?E65 688 2?5 DA6C>]k^Am

    kAmu2D@=5 H2D :?EC:8F65 H:E9 E96 :562 7@==@H:?8 96C @H? 9:89C:D< 3:CE9 D6G6? J62CD 28@ H9:49 C6BF:C65 E9C66 DFC86C:6D 😕 E96 E9:C5 EC:>6DE6C]k^Am

    kAm“(6 5:5?’E H2?E >@C6 <:5D 3FE x 5:5 H2?E 2 36EE6C AC68?2?4J DE@CJ[” D96 D2:5[ 255:?8 E92E 96C r9C:DE:2? 72:E9 2=D@ 8F:565 96C 564:D:@? E@ 96=A @E96CD]k^Am

    kAm%96 u2D@=5D 28C665 E@ H@C< H:E9 E96 }6H y6CD6J 4@FA=6] u2D@=5 F?56CH6?E ADJ49@=@8:42= 2?5 A9JD:42= E6DE:?8 2?5 H2D 4=62C65 E@ 36 2 DFCC@82E6[ 3FE E96 }6H y6CD6J 4@FA=6’D DFCC@824J 286?4J 564=:?65 E@ H@C< H:E9 96C 5F6 E@ 96C 7:CDE 9:89C:D< AC68?2?4J]k^Am

    kAm“(6 C6DA64E65 E92E 2?5 E96J 7@F?5 2 8C62E DFCC@82E6[” u2D@=5 D2:5[ 255:?8 E96 }6H y6CD6J 4@FA=6 6?4@FC2865 96C E@ 7:?5 2?@E96C 4@FA=6 😕 ?665]k^Am

    kAmp3@FE `h A6C46?E @7 &]$] >2CC:65 4@FA=6D DECF88=6 H:E9 :?76CE:=:EJ 2?5 >2?J EFC? E@ DFCC@824J[ H9:49[ 244@C5:?8 E@ E96 rsr[ 92D C6DF=E65 😕 2 C:D6 😕 86DE2E:@?2= 42CC:6CD C646:G:?8 EC2?DA=2?E65 6>3CJ@D 7C@> b[a_a 😕 a_`a E@ g[gea 😕 a_a`]k^Am

    kAm%96 u2D@=5D ;@:?65 2 u2463@@< A286 7@C :?76CE:=6 4@FA=6D D66<:?8 2 86DE2E:@?2= 42CC:6C 2?5 A@E6?E:2= DFCC@82E6D D66<:?8 4@FA=6D]k^Am

    kAm“%96C6 2C6 D@ >2?J A6@A=6 =@@<:?8 7@C 2 DFCC@82E6 2?5 x H2D C625:?8 2== E96D6 DF446DD DE@C:6D[” u2D@=5 D2:5]k^Am

    kAmp7E6C A@DE:?8 96C @H? DE@CJ @?=:?6[ u2D@=5 H2D 4@?E24E65 3J E96 r2=:7@C?:232D65 |2C< $FCC@824J]k^Am

    kAm“%96J 2D<65 H92E H6 H6C6 =@@<:?8 7@C[ 2?5 H6 D2:5 H6 5:5?’E H2?E 2 C6=2E:@?D9:A H:E9 E96 A2C6?ED[” D96 D2:5 @7 E96:C 56D:C6 E@ AC@G:56 2 962=E9J 49:=5 E@ 2? :?76CE:=6 4@FA=6 H:E9 ?@ DEC:?8D 2EE24965] %96 286?4J D2:5 E96 A2C6?ED 76=E E96 D2>6]k^Am

    kAmu2D@=5 2?5 96C 9FD32?5 5:5 5F6 5:=:86?46 2?5 9:C65 2 }6H y6CD6J =2H 7:C> E@ C6G:6H E96 4@?EC24E E96J D:8?65 H:E9 |2C< $FCC@824J] “(6 4964<65 @FE E96 286?4J H63D:E6 2?5 E96 255C6DD 2?5 H96? H6 42==65 2?5 8@E 2 C62= A6CD@? H9@ 2?DH6C65 @FC BF6DE:@?D :E 62D65 @FC >:?5D[” D96 D2:5] “}@E9:?8 D66>65 @55] %96C6 H6C6 ?@ C65 7=28D]”k^Am

    kAmqJ =2E6 DF>>6C a_ac[ E96 u2D@=5D H6C6 @? 2? 2:CA=2?6 962565 7@C 2 7:G652J[ A2:5 DE2J 😕 r2=:7@C?:2 H96C6 p=6I2 u2D@=5 F?56CH6?E 2? 6>3CJ@ EC2?DA=2?E]k^Am

    kAm“xE H2D 2? 62DJ AC@465FC6[ 3FE x H2?E65 E@ >66E E96> E@ >2<6 E96 AC@46DD >@C6 C62= 7@C FD[” D2:5 u2D@=5[ H9@ 2D<65 E@ >66E H:E9 E96 4@FA=6 H9@D6 323J D96 H@F=5 36 42CCJ:?8] “%96J H6C6 DFA6C ?:46 2?5 E@=5 FD E96J 5:5?’E 92G6 2?J 49:=5C6?]”k^Am

    [ad_2]

    By Marcia Moore mmoore@dailyitem.com

    Source link

  • Sunbury woman carried child for California couple suspected of scam

    [ad_1]

    SUNBURY — Sunbury resident Alexa Fasold thought she was helping a childless California couple when she agreed to be a surrogate, but learned they may be part of a nationwide scam before delivering the baby in October.

    The healthy infant boy has been placed with a foster family in Montour County while the FBI and California authorities investigate Silvia Zhang, 38, and Guojun Xuan, 65, the owners of Mark Surrogacy, an Arcadia, Calif.-based agency, who were accused of felony child endangerment and child neglect and later found to have 21 children between the ages of 2 and 13 — mostly toddlers delivered by surrogates — in their home or care.

    This page requires Javascript.

    Javascript is required for you to be able to read premium content. Please enable it in your browser settings.

    kAm%96 492C86D H6C6 =2E6C 5C@AA65[ 3FE E96 49:=5C6? H6C6 C6>@G65 2?5 E96 4@FA=6 C6>2:?D F?56C D4CFE:?J 56DA:E6 +92?8 56?J:?8 :?G@=G6>6?E 😕 9F>2? EC277:4<:?8]k^Am

    kAm“xE D66>D x H2D 2 DFCC@82E6 7@C 4C:>:?2=D[” u2D@=5[ DE:== DEF??65 3J E96 EFC? @7 6G6?ED[ D2:5]k^Am

    kAmu2D@=5[ ae[ 2? H:==:?8 E@ 42CCJ 2 49:=5 7@C E96> FD:?8 E96:C :>A=2?E65 688 2?5 DA6C>]k^Am

    kAmu2D@=5 H2D :?EC:8F65 H:E9 E96 :562 7@==@H:?8 96C @H? 9:89C:D< 3:CE9 D6G6? J62CD 28@ H9:49 C6BF:C65 E9C66 DFC86C:6D 😕 E96 E9:C5 EC:>6DE6C]k^Am

    kAm“(6 5:5?’E H2?E >@C6 <:5D 3FE x 5:5 H2?E 2 36EE6C AC68?2?4J DE@CJ[” D96 D2:5[ 255:?8 E92E 96C r9C:DE:2? 72:E9 2=D@ 8F:565 96C 564:D:@? E@ 96=A @E96CD]k^Am

    kAm%96 u2D@=5D 28C665 E@ H@C< H:E9 E96 }6H y6CD6J 4@FA=6] u2D@=5 F?56CH6?E ADJ49@=@8:42= 2?5 A9JD:42= E6DE:?8 2?5 H2D 4=62C65 E@ 36 2 DFCC@82E6[ 3FE E96 }6H y6CD6J 4@FA=6’D DFCC@824J 286?4J 564=:?65 E@ H@C< H:E9 96C 5F6 E@ 96C 7:CDE 9:89C:D< AC68?2?4J]k^Am

    kAm“(6 C6DA64E65 E92E 2?5 E96J 7@F?5 2 8C62E DFCC@82E6[” u2D@=5 D2:5[ 255:?8 E96 }6H y6CD6J 4@FA=6 6?4@FC2865 96C E@ 7:?5 2?@E96C 4@FA=6 😕 ?665]k^Am

    kAmp3@FE `h A6C46?E @7 &]$] >2CC:65 4@FA=6D DECF88=6 H:E9 :?76CE:=:EJ 2?5 >2?J EFC? E@ DFCC@824J[ H9:49[ 244@C5:?8 E@ E96 rsr[ 92D C6DF=E65 😕 2 C:D6 😕 86DE2E:@?2= 42CC:6CD C646:G:?8 EC2?DA=2?E65 6>3CJ@D 7C@> b[a_a 😕 a_`a E@ g[gea 😕 a_a`]k^Am

    kAm%96 u2D@=5D ;@:?65 2 u2463@@< A286 7@C :?76CE:=6 4@FA=6D D66<:?8 2 86DE2E:@?2= 42CC:6C 2?5 A@E6?E:2= DFCC@82E6D D66<:?8 4@FA=6D]k^Am

    kAm“%96C6 2C6 D@ >2?J A6@A=6 =@@<:?8 7@C 2 DFCC@82E6 2?5 x H2D C625:?8 2== E96D6 DF446DD DE@C:6D[” u2D@=5 D2:5]k^Am

    kAmp7E6C A@DE:?8 96C @H? DE@CJ @?=:?6[ u2D@=5 H2D 4@?E24E65 3J E96 r2=:7@C?:232D65 |2C< $FCC@824J]k^Am

    kAm“%96J 2D<65 H92E H6 H6C6 =@@<:?8 7@C[ 2?5 H6 D2:5 H6 5:5?’E H2?E 2 C6=2E:@?D9:A H:E9 E96 A2C6?ED[” D96 D2:5 @7 E96:C 56D:C6 E@ AC@G:56 2 962=E9J 49:=5 E@ 2? :?76CE:=6 4@FA=6 H:E9 ?@ DEC:?8D 2EE24965] %96 286?4J D2:5 E96 A2C6?ED 76=E E96 D2>6]k^Am

    kAmu2D@=5 2?5 96C 9FD32?5 5:5 5F6 5:=:86?46 2?5 9:C65 2 }6H y6CD6J =2H 7:C> E@ C6G:6H E96 4@?EC24E E96J D:8?65 H:E9 |2C< $FCC@824J] “(6 4964<65 @FE E96 286?4J H63D:E6 2?5 E96 255C6DD 2?5 H96? H6 42==65 2?5 8@E 2 C62= A6CD@? H9@ 2?DH6C65 @FC BF6DE:@?D :E 62D65 @FC >:?5D[” D96 D2:5] “}@E9:?8 D66>65 @55] %96C6 H6C6 ?@ C65 7=28D]”k^Am

    kAmqJ =2E6 DF>>6C a_ac[ E96 u2D@=5D H6C6 @? 2? 2:CA=2?6 962565 7@C 2 7:G652J[ A2:5 DE2J 😕 r2=:7@C?:2 H96C6 p=6I2 u2D@=5 F?56CH6?E 2? 6>3CJ@ EC2?DA=2?E]k^Am

    kAm“xE H2D 2? 62DJ AC@465FC6[ 3FE x H2?E65 E@ >66E E96> E@ >2<6 E96 AC@46DD >@C6 C62= 7@C FD[” D2:5 u2D@=5[ H9@ 2D<65 E@ >66E H:E9 E96 4@FA=6 H9@D6 323J D96 H@F=5 36 42CCJ:?8] “%96J H6C6 DFA6C ?:46 2?5 E@=5 FD E96J 5:5?’E 92G6 2?J 49:=5C6?]”k^Am

    [ad_2]

    By Marcia Moore mmoore@dailyitem.com

    Source link

  • AGs sue over threats to pull sex ed funding

    [ad_1]

    BOSTON — Massachusetts is among a group of states suing the Trump administration over threats to pull federal sexual education funding from curricula focusing on gender identities.

    The lawsuit, filed Friday in the U.S. District Court in Oregon by Massachusetts Attorney General Andrea Campbell and 16 other Democrats, alleges that new conditions imposed by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services to receive the grant funding violate federal law, the separation of powers and Congress’ spending power.


    This page requires Javascript.

    Javascript is required for you to be able to read premium content. Please enable it in your browser settings.

    kAm%96 pvD 2C8F6 E96 25>:?:DEC2E:@? F?=2H7F==J H2?ED E96> E@ “C6HC:E6 D6IF2= 962=E9 4FCC:4F=2 E@ 6C2D6 6?E:C6 42E68@C:6D @7 DEF56?ED[” 2D A2CE @7 :ED =2E6DE 677@CE E@ E2C86E EC2?D86?56C J@FE9]k^Am

    kAm“&?:=2E6C2==J C6BF:C:?8 DE2E6D E@ C6>@G6 2== C676C6?46D E@ “86?56C :56@=@8J” — 2 G28F6[ F?567:?65[ 2?5 ?@?D6?D:42= E6C> — 2=D@ FDFCAD r@?8C6DD’ DA6?5:?8 A@H6C 2?5 G:@=2E6D E96 D6A2C2E:@? @7 A@H6CD[” E96J HC@E6] “%96 r@?DE:EFE:@? >2<6D 4=62C E92E :E 😀 r@?8C6DD[ ?@E E96 6I64FE:G6 3C2?49[ H9@ 4@?EC@=D E96 7656C2= 8@G6C?>6?E’D DA6?5:?8 2FE9@C:EJ]”k^Am

    kAmww$ H2?ED E@ AC@9:3:E E96 :?4=FD:@? @7 H92E :E 56D4C:36D 2D “86?56C :56@=@8J” 😕 =6DD@?D 7F?565 3J E96 !6CD@?2= #6DA@?D:3:=:EJ t5F42E:@? !C@8C2> 2?5 E96 %:E=6 ‘ $6IF2= #:D< pG@:52?46 t5F42E:@? AC@8C2>] q@E9 AC@8C2>D E6249 23DE:?6?46 2?5 4@?EC246AE:@? 7@C E96 AC6G6?E:@? @7 AC68?2?4J 2?5 D6IF2==J EC2?D>:EE65 :?764E:@?D]k^Am

    kAmr@>3:?65[ E96 E6C>:?2E:@? @7 7F?5:?8 F?56C E96 EH@ 7656C2= 8C2?E AC@8C2>D 4@F=5 C6DF=E 😕 2 =@DD @7 2E =62DE Sbd >:==:@? E@ E96 DE2E6D[ 244@C5:?8 E@ E96 pvD’ 4@>A=2:?E]k^Am

    kAm!C6D:56?E s@?2=5 %CF>A :DDF65 2? 6I64FE:G6 @C56C 😕 y2?F2CJ C6BF:C:?8 E96 7656C2= 8@G6C?>6?E E@ C64@8?:K6 @?=J EH@ D6I6D — >2=6 2?5 76>2=6 — 2?5 5:C64E65 7656C2= 286?4:6D E@ D4CF3 2?J >6?E:@?D @7 “86?56C :56@=@8J” 😕 4@?EC24ED[ 7656C2==J 7F?565 8C2?ED[ ;@3 56D4C:AE:@?D 2?5 D@4:2= >65:2 244@F?ED]k^Am

    kAmx? pF8FDE[ ww$ D6?E 2 =6EE6C E@ ce DE2E6D[ :?4=F5:?8 |2DD249FD6EED[ 56>2?5:?8 E96J C6>@G6 2== C676C6?46D E@ “86?56C :56@=@8J” 4@?E2:?65 😕 D6IF2= 65F42E:@? 4FCC:4F=2 2?5 >2E6C:2=D A2:5 7@C E9C@F89 E96 EH@ 7656C2==J 7F?565 D6I65 AC@8C2>D]k^Am

    kAm%96 5:C64E:G6[ :DDF65 E9C@F89 E96 286?4J’D p5>:?:DEC2E:@? 7@C r9:=5C6? 2?5 u2>:=:6D[ 82G6 DE2E6D e_ 52JD E@ C6G:D6 >2E6C:2=D FD65 😕 E96 !6CD@?2= #6DA@?D:3:=:EJ t5F42E:@? !C@8C2> @C C:D< =@D:?8 E96 7F?5D] %96 286?4J 42?46==65 2 S`a >:==:@? !#t! 8C2?E E@ r2=:7@C?:2 2D A2CE @7 E96 24E:@?D]k^Am

    kAm“p44@F?E23:=:EJ 😀 4@>:?8[” p4E:?8 pDD:DE2?E $64C6E2CJ p?5C6H vC25:D@? D2:5 😕 2 DE2E6>6?E 2E E96 E:>6] “u656C2= 7F?5D H:== ?@E 36 FD65 E@ A@:D@? E96 >:?5D @7 E96 ?6IE 86?6C2E:@? @C 25G2?46 52?86C@FD :56@=@8:42= 286?52D] %96 %CF>A p5>:?:DEC2E:@? H:== 6?DFC6 E92E !#t! C67=64ED E96 :?E6?E @7 r@?8C6DD[ ?@E E96 AC:@C:E:6D @7 E96 =67E]”k^Am

    kAm|2DD249FD6EED 86ED 23@FE S` >:==:@? 2??F2==J 7C@> E96 !#t! 8C2?E E@ 65F42E6 E66?286CD @? AC68?2?4J 2?5 AC6G6?E:?8 E96 DAC625 @7 D6IF2==J EC2?D>:EE65 :?764E:@?D]k^Am

    kAmr2>A36== D2:5 E96 %CF>A 25>:?:DEC2E:@? 😀 9@=5:?8 “E9:D 4C:E:42= 65F42E:@? 7F?5:?8 9@DE286 F?=6DD DE2E6D 28C66 E@ 6C2D6 EC2?D86?56C 2?5 ?@?3:?2CJ A6@A=6’D 6IA6C:6?46D 7C@> E96 4FCC:4F=F>]”k^Am

    kAm$96 D2:5 E96 >@G6 😀 F?=2H7F= 2?5 566A=J 92C>7F= E@ J@F?8 A6@A=6]k^Am

    kAm“tG6CJ DEF56?E 56D6CG6D E@ =62C? 😕 2? 6?G:C@?>6?E H96C6 E96:C :56?E:E:6D 2C6 C6DA64E65[ 2?5 @FC D49@@=D 92G6 2? @3=:82E:@? E@ AC@G:56 2 4@>AC696?D:G6 D6IF2= 65F42E:@? E92E DFAA@CED E96 962=E9 2?5 H6==36:?8 @7 2== DEF56?ED[ :?4=F5:?8 @FC {vq%”Z J@FE9[” r2>A36== D2:5 😕 2 DE2E6>6?E]k^Am

    kAm%96 @E96C A=2:?E:77D :?4=F56 r2=:7@C?:2[ ~C68@?[ (2D9:?8E@?[ |:??6D@E2[ r@=@C25@[ r@??64E:4FE[ s6=2H2C6[ w2H2::[ x==:?@:D[ |2CJ=2?5[ |2:?6[ |:49:82?[ }6H y6CD6J[ }6H *@C<[ #9@56 xD=2?5[ (:D4@?D:? 2?5 E96 s:DEC:4E @7 r@=F>3:2]k^Am

    kAmr9C:DE:2? |] (256 4@G6CD E96 |2DD249FD6EED $E2E69@FD6 7@C }@CE9 @7 q@DE@? |65:2 vC@FAUCDBF@jD ?6HDA2A6CD 2?5 H63D:E6D] t>2:= 9:> 2E k2 9C67lQ>2:=E@i4H256o4?9:?6HD]4@>Qm4H256o4?9:?6HD]4@>k^2m]k^Am

    [ad_2]

    By Christian M. Wade | Statehouse Reporter

    Source link

  • Parenting 101: Mother’s Day gifts she’ll actually love

    [ad_1]

    Mother’s Day is right around the corner, and while mom might say she loves her “world’s greatest mom” mug, she’d secretly prefer something a tad more useful, indulgent, or fun. So, here are a few Mother’s Day gifts mom will actually love.

    A book she can read with her littles. Nothing is more special than spending time curled up with a great story. Consider the new title Mama’s Shoes, a heartwarming story from bestselling illustrator Vanessa Brantley-Newton and award-winning author Caron Levis. It’s a celebration of hard-working moms everywhere, and the children who love them.

    Mom will love curling up in this organic Turkish cotton robe from Crate & Barrel. It’s unbelievably plush and incredibly soft, and has sophisticated Herringbone detailing for a touch of chic. 

    Give mom a good reason for some self care with this Hair Care Bundle from Hello Joyous. It has everything she’ll need to nourish her scalp and strands with cold-pressed organic botanicals and clean, effective essentials designed to revitalize, strengthen, and refresh. 

    Skip the sad bouquet and get mom what she really wants for Mother’s Day: cookware that comes with a lifetime warranty. No wilt, no guilt because mom deserves better. The HexClad Hybrid Deep Saute Pan can do it all – she’ll want to keep this one-pot meal workhorse on the closest burner for searing, braising, frying and simmering, and its high sides will help keep the kitchen spatter-free. And their Hybrid Wok is ideal for when she’s cooking for a crowd or wants to make sure there are leftovers – she can prepare a whole meal in one pan: stir-fries, pasta dishes, soups, and more.

    What’s better than a yummy breakfast in bed? From shakes to smoothie bowls (and even frozen cocktails – cue Jimmy Buffett’s “It’s 5 o’clock Somewhere”), Hamilton Beach’s 10 Speed Blender serves up perfectly smooth results every time. Packed with power, the blender’s blades can turn anything into a healthy, tasty treat. Surprise Mom or Dad with this Pineapple Mango Smoothie Bowl this Mother’s Day/Father’s Day!

    Busy moms appreciate (and look forward to) a great cup of coffee. Nespresso Canada has several new spring launches that mom would love to add to her coffee arsenal. From the Vertuo line, Vivida integrates taste and wellness with a coffee enriched with Vitamin B12. Also, the new Active+ is part of the Nespresso Coffee+ range, a coffee blend with added Vitamin B6, a vitamin that reduces tiredness and fatigue when consumed daily. From the Original line, Vienna is a balanced blend of smooth and silky South American Arabicas, while the Vienna Linizio Lungo Decaffeinato recreates this balanced and pleasant Viennese taste by pairing sweet Brazilian and Colombian Arabicas, lightly roasted by their experts. And the Arpeggio & Decaf Arpeggio are new dense and creamy coffees with a bold roast and notes of cocoa. Its creamy, velvety texture is irresistible. It’s also a great capsule for Nespresso Martinis!

    – JC

    [ad_2]

    By: Jennifer Cox The Suburban

    Source link

  • New campaign targets anti-abortion clinics

    New campaign targets anti-abortion clinics

    [ad_1]

    BOSTON — Beacon Hill leaders have rolled out a new public education campaign taking aim at pregnancy crisis centers, which have emerged as the latest battleground in abortion access following the Supreme Court’s 2022 ruling overturning federal protections.

    The state Department of Public Health said Monday that it has partnered with the advocacy group Reproductive Equity Now Foundation on a new campaign to educate the public about the “dangers and potential harm” of anti-abortion centers that advocates say are providing misleading information to women.

    The campaign, which is funded by $1 million carved out in a fiscal 2023 supplemental budget, will appear on social media platforms, billboards, radio and transit, officials said.

    Gov. Maura Healey, who approved the funding, said the goal is to help protect access to “safe and legal” abortions. She said crisis pregnancy centers outnumber women’s reproductive health clinics by more than 2-1 and use “deceptive and dangerous tactics.”

    “This campaign is an important way to provide accurate information so residents can make informed decisions about reproductive care that are right for them,” Healey said in remarks Monday.

    The centers, which advertise free services and counseling for women struggling with unplanned pregnancies, have proliferated in the wake of the high court’s 2022 decision overturning the landmark 1973 Roe v. Wade ruling.

    But women’s reproductive rights groups argue the facilities are funded by anti-abortion groups with the sole intention of blocking women from getting abortions.

    Some communities have moved to limit or ban the centers amid complaints that they are using deceptive advertising and providing misinformation.

    “Information is power, and today, Massachusetts is putting power in the hands of our communities by alerting them to the dangers of deceptive anti-abortion centers,” Rebecca Hart Holder, the foundation’s president, said in a statement. “Together, we can combat anti-abortion centers’ predatory practices and ensure every person in Massachusetts has access to the health care they want and need, without deception or delay.”

    Despite the claims by Healey and other state leaders, anti-abortion groups say the centers are providing options to women other than abortions and being unfairly targeted by a “smear campaign” by proponents of the procedure.

    The conservative Massachusetts Family institute says it has documented acts of vandalism and intimidation at pregnancy centers across the state.

    The Pregnancy Care Alliance of Massachusetts said the network of pregnancy care centers in the state “provides millions of dollars in no-cost support and care for thousands of women annually who face planned and unplanned pregnancies, with services ranging from pregnancy confirmation services, parenting education, and community referrals to material goods like diapers and formula.”

    The group accused Healey and other state leaders of “furthering their extreme abortion agenda by using a taxpayer-funded campaign to discredit our centers.”

    “This politically motivated campaign will negatively impact women the most, specifically the many women who want to parent and rely on the free assistance we provide,” the group said in a statement.

    Abortion is legal in Massachusetts under a 2020 law, but advocates say the state has become a destination for women coming from other states that banned the procedure or tightened their laws following the Supreme Court’s ruling.

    State leaders took steps to shield providers and patients from potential lawsuits filed by groups of other states where abortion is now restricted.

    But advocates are pressuring the state to intervene to prevent crisis pregnancy centers from proliferating as more women come to Massachusetts seeking abortions. They’ve been pushing for funding for the public education campaign for several years.

    In 2022, then-Gov. Charlie Baker vetoed $1 million for the campaign from the economic development bill shortly before he left office. Baker said the spending was unnecessary because the state already posts public information about legitimate family planning services operating in the state.

    His rejection of the proposal prompted terse statements from women’s reproductive advocacy groups, which accused the pro-choice Republican of being “wildly out of touch” with his constituents, while it was praised by anti-abortion groups, which say the pregnancy centers are being unfairly targeted.

    Christian M. Wade covers the Massachusetts Statehouse for North of Boston Media Group’s newspapers and websites. Email him at cwade@cnhinews.com.

    [ad_2]

    By Christian M. Wade | Statehouse Reporter

    Source link

  • Couple Struggling To Conceive Considers Trying Sexual Intercourse

    Couple Struggling To Conceive Considers Trying Sexual Intercourse

    [ad_1]

    NEW YORK—Saying they had struggled for years with infertility and were open to any new approach that might help them conceive, local married couple Nina and Joe Klasfeld told reporters Monday they were considering sexual intercourse. “It would be a last resort, obviously, but since we’ve had so much trouble getting pregnant, we’re seriously thinking about having sex,” said Nina Klasfeld, who added that while sex seemed like a long shot, she and her husband had already tried fertility drugs, hormone treatments, and using an ovulation calendar to time their kissing, all to no avail. “Maybe it’s a coincidence, but a lot of my friends seem to get pregnant after they start having sex. On the one hand, I’m skeptical, because sexual intercourse just sounds like it’s some kind of weird, old-fashioned folk remedy for infertility. But on the other hand, what do we have to lose at this point? We really want a baby.” At press time, the Klasfelds confirmed the pregnancy tests were still coming back negative even though they were having so much sex they had worked their way through a 36-pack of Trojans.

    [ad_2]

    Source link