ReportWire

Tag: gender equality

  • DiZoglio to sue MassPort over settlement details

    [ad_1]

    BOSTON — State Auditor Diana DiZoglio said she plans to sue the agency that oversees Logan International Airport, accusing officials of withholding details of settlements with state employees her office was seeking for a required audit.

    DiZoglio released an audit on Wednesday that found the Massachusetts Port Authority entered into a $1.37 million settlement agreement in 2022 which her office says took advantage of nondisclosure laws to conceal allegations that included gender- and disability-based discrimination as well as unequal pay.

    This page requires Javascript.

    Javascript is required for you to be able to read premium content. Please enable it in your browser settings.

    kAmqFE E96 |6E9F6? s6>@4C2E D2:5 E96 C6G:6H[ C6BF:C65 6G6CJ E9C66 J62CD F?56C DE2E6 =2H[ H2D 9:?56C65 3J E96 BF2D:AF3=:4 286?4J’D C67FD2= E@ EFC? @G6C 56E2:=D @7 E96 a_aa D6EE=6>6?E 2?5 72:=FC6 E@ 5:D4=@D6 @E96C D64C6E:G6 28C66>6?ED E@ 2F5:E@CD]k^Am

    kAm$96 2=D@ 4=2:>65 E92E pEE@C?6J v6?6C2= p?5C62 r2>A36==’D @77:46 2?5 |2DD!@CE “:>AC@A6C=J” D92C65 56E2:=D 23@FE E96 2F5:E H:E9 6>A=@J66D 2?5 C6E:C66D H9@ H6C6 ?@E :?G@=G65 😕 E96 C6G:6H]k^Am

    kAm“qJ 5@:?8 D@[ E96J :?E6C76C65 H:E9 =2H7F= @G6CD:89E 2?5 92>A6C65 E96 2F5:E AC@46DD[ H9:=6 56=2J:?8[ 2?5 😕 |2DD!@CE’D 42D6 3=@4<:?8[ @FC DE2EFE@C:=J 2FE9@C:K65 2446DD E@ D@>6 @7 E96D6 C64@C5D C6BF:C65 E@ 4@?5F4E @FC 2F5:E[” s:+@8=:@ D2:5 2E 2 3C:67:?8 (65?6D52J]k^Am

    kAmqFE 2 |2DD!@CE DA@<6DH@>2? D2:5 E96 286?4J H2D “7F==J 4@@A6C2E:G6” H:E9 E96 2F5:E@C’D @77:46 5FC:?8 :ED C6G:6H 2?5 A@:?E65 @FE E92E E96 C6A@CE 4@?E2:?65 “:?244FC24:6D” DF49 2D 2 4=2:> E92E E96 a_aa |2DD!@CE D6EE=6>6?E H2D 7F?565 3J E2IA2J6CD] %96 286?4J 😀 7F?565 3J >@?6J 7C@> :ED @H? @A6C2E:@?D]k^Am

    kAm“|2DD!@CE[ 2D 2 AF3=:4 6>A=@J6C[ ?@E:7:65 >@C6 E92? `__ 4FCC6?E 2?5 7@C>6C 6>A=@J66D E92E E96 2F5:E@C 925 C6BF6DE65 E@ C6G:6H E96:C 7:=6D 2D C6BF:C65 3J E96 |2DD249FD6EED u2:C x?7@C>2E:@? !C24E:46D p4E[” |2DD!@CE DA@<6DH@>2? y6??:76C |69:82? D2:5] “p D>2== ?F>36C @7 :?5:G:5F2=D @3;64E65[ H9:49 😀 E96:C C:89E[ 2?5 H6 ?@E:7:65 E96 2F5:E@C’D @77:46 @7 E9:D]”k^Am

    kAm%96 |2DD!@CE 2F5:E H2D A2CE @7 2 3C@256C C6G:6H @7 DE2E6 F?:G6CD:E:6D 2?5 4@==686D[ BF2D:DE2E6 286?4:6D 2?5 4@?DE:EFE:@?2= @77:46D[ 4@G6C:?8 E96 A6C:@5 @7 y2?] `[ a_`h[ E9C@F89 s64] b`[ a_ac]k^Am

    kAm~G6C2==[ s:+@8=:@’D @77:46 D2:5 E96 :?G6DE:82E:@? C6G62=65 E92E E96 a` 286?4:6D :E C6G:6H65 6?E6C65 :?E@ 2E =62DE aeb 28C66>6?ED E@E2=:?8 23@FE Se]g >:==:@? 😕 E2IA2J6C >@?6J 5FC:?8 2 D:IJ62C A6C:@5]k^Am

    kAmpF5:E@CD D2:5 E96J 7@F?5 2 A2E49H@C< @7 A@=:4:6D E92E 92G6 =2C86=J 2==@H65 E96 286?4:6D E@ D9:6=5 56E2:=D @7 E96 28C66>6?ED 7C@> E96 AF3=:4’D G:6H] $@>6 286?4:6D C67FD65 E@ AC@G:56 56E2:=D @7 2 D6EE=6>6?ED[ E96J D2:5]k^Am

    kAm“(:E9@FE 4=62C[ 5@4F>6?E65 A@=:4:6D[ 286?4:6D 42??@E 6?DFC6 D6EE=6>6?ED 2C6 92?5=65 72:C=J[ =682==J[ @C 4@?D:DE6?E=J[” E96 2F5:E@C’D C6A@CE DE2E6D] “%9:D =24< @7 DECF4EFC6 2=D@ >2<6D :E 5:77:4F=E 7@C E96 AF3=:4 E@ F?56CDE2?5 9@H E96:C E2I 5@==2CD 2C6 DA6?E[ H9:=6 :?4C62D:?8 E96 C:D< @7 244@F?E:?8 6CC@CD 3642FD6 E96 ~77:46 @7 E96 r@>AEC@==6C >2J ?@E 36 23=6 E@ AC@A6C=J C6G:6H D6EE=6>6?E A2J>6?ED]”k^Am

    [ad_2]

    By Christian M. Wade | Statehouse Reporter

    Source link

  • Democrats vow to challenge ban on gender-affirming care

    [ad_1]

    BOSTON — Foreshadowing a legal challenge, Massachusetts Attorney General Campbell is joining a chorus of criticism over the Trump administration’s move to effectively ban gender-affirming care for minors at hospitals that depend on federal funding.

    On Thursday, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services issued new regulations that would once finalized, restrict the use of puberty blockers, hormone therapy and surgical interventions for transgender children.

    This page requires Javascript.

    Javascript is required for you to be able to read premium content. Please enable it in your browser settings.

    kAm%96 DH66A:?8 ?6H CF=6D 2=D@ E9C62E6? E@ 4FE @77 7656C2= |65:42:5 2?5 |65:42C6 7F?5:?8 7C@> 9@DA:E2=D E92E AC@G:56 86?56C277:C>:?8 42C6 E@ 49:=5C6?]k^Am

    kAm“%9:D 😀 ?@E >65:4:?6[ :E 😀 >2=AC24E:46[” w62=E9 $64C6E2CJ #@36CE u] z6??65J yC] D2:5 2E 2 AC6DD 3C:67:?8 %9FCD52J H96C6 96 2?5 @E96C @77:4:2=D 5:D4FDD65 E96 C68F=2E:@?D E@ C6DEC:4E 86?56C277:C>:?8 42C6 2>@?8 >:?@CD] “$6IC6;64E:?8 AC@465FC6D C@3 49:=5C6? @7 E96:C 7FEFC6D]”k^Am

    kAm%96 ?6H 5:C64E:G6D[ H9:49 7@==@H @E96C 5:G:D:G6 A@=:4:6D 3J E96 %CF>A 25>:?:DEC2E:@? 2:>65 2E EC2?D86?56C A6@A=6[ 5C6H DH:7E 4@?56>?2E:@? 7C@> s6>@4C2ED[ 962=E9 42C6 25G@42E6D 2?5 8C@FAD C6AC6D6?E:?8 EC2?D86?56C :?5:G:5F2=D[ H9@ 2C8F65 E92E E96 >@G6 H@F=5 36 5:D4C:>:?2E@CJ 2?5 F?=2H7F=]k^Am

    kAmr2>A36== :DDF65 2 DE2E6>6?E %9FCD52J 27E6C?@@? D2J:?8 96C @77:46 H:== “DE2?5 FA 7@C E96 CF=6 @7 =2H 2?5 E96 C:89E @7 2== |2DD249FD6EED C6D:56?ED E@ C646:G6 >65:42==J ?646DD2CJ 962=E9 42C6” 2?5 D2:5 D96 😀 “AC6A2C65 E@ E2<6 24E:@? :7 2?J F?=2H7F= CF=6 😀 7:?2=:K65]”k^Am

    kAm“|65:42==J ?646DD2CJ 962=E9 42C6 7@C EC2?D86?56C J@FE9 D2G6D =:G6D 2?5 😀 6DD6?E:2= E@ E96:C 6>@E:@?2= 2?5 A9JD:42= H6==36:?8[” r2>A36== D2:5 😕 2 DE2E6>6?E]k^Am

    kAm“(9:=6 E96D6 AC@A@D65 CF=6D 4CF6==J E2C86E @FC EC2?D 4@>>F?:EJ[ E96J H:== AFE >:==:@?D @7 p>6C:42?D’ 962=E9 42C6 2E C:D< 3J 7@C4:?8 9@DA:E2=D 2?5 >65:42= AC@G:56CD E@ 49@@D6 36EH66? C646:G:?8 |65:42:5 2?5 |65:42C6 7F?5:?8 @C 232?5@?:?8 E96:C 25@=6D46?E EC2?D86?56C A2E:6?ED[” D96 D2:5]k^Am

    kAmr2>A36== D2:5 E96 CF=6D “2C6 ?@E =2H” 2?5 E92E A2E:6?ED’ C:89ED 2?5 962=E9 :?DFC6CD’ C6DA@?D:3:=:E:6D F?56C |65:42:5 C6>2:? F?492?865] v6?56C277:C>:?8 42C6 C6>2:?D =682= F?56C 7656C2= =2H[ 2?5 2446DD E@ 86?56C277:C>:?8 42C6 C6>2:?D =682= 2?5 AC@E64E65 😕 |2DD249FD6EED[ D96 D2:5]k^Am

    kAm$:?46 E2<:?8 @77:46 😕 y2?F2CJ[ #6AF3=:42? !C6D:56?E s@?2=5 %CF>A 92D G@H65 E@ 32? EC2?D86?56C AC@465FC6D 2>@?8 E66?286CD[ 2C8F:?8 E92E 86?56C AC@465FC6D 2C6 56EC:>6?E2= E@ 49:=5C6?’D 962=E9 2?5 A2C6?E2= C:89ED 2C6 @7E6? EC2>A=65 😕 E96 AC@46DD]k^Am

    kAm“uC@> s2J ~?6[ E96 %CF>A p5>:?:DEC2E:@? 92D E2C86E65 EC2?D J@FE9 2?5 E96:C 962=E9 42C6 AC@G:56CD[ DAC625:?8 =:6D 2?5 DE@<:?8 762C 23@FE EC2?D A6@A=6 2?5 ECJ:?8 E@ C6DEC:4E 2446DD E@ E96:C 42C6[” s@>:?:BF6 {66[ AC6D:56?E 2?5 rt~ @7 !=2??65 !2C6?E9@@5 {628F6 @7 |2DD249FD6EED[ D2:5 😕 2 DE2E6>6?E] “rFEE:?8 7656C2= 7F?5:?8 @77 7C@> AC@G:56CD @7 E9:D 42C6 😀 ;FDE @?6 @7 >2?J E24E:4D !C6D:56?E %CF>A 2?5 9:D 2==:6D 2C6 FD:?8 E@ ECJ E@ C:A 2H2J @FC C:89ED 2?5 7C665@>D]”k^Am

    kAm|62?H9:=6[ DE2E6D DF49 2D p=232>2 2C6 G@H:?8 E@ AC@D64FE6 A9JD:4:2?D 😕 |2DD249FD6EED 2?5 @E96C DE2E6D H9@ A6C7@C> 23@CE:@?D 2?5 EC2?D86?56C 42C6 7@C E96:C C6D:56?ED]k^Am

    kAmx? yF?6[ E96 &]$] $FAC6>6 r@FCE CF=65 E92E %6??6DD66’D AC@9:3:E:@? @? AF36CEJ 3=@4<6CD 2?5 9@C>@?6 E96C2AJ 7@C >:?@CD 5@6D ?@E G:@=2E6 E96 r@?DE:EFE:@?’D `cE9 p>6?5>6?E] %96 CF=:?8 >62?D D:>:=2C C6DEC:4E:@?D 2AAC@G65 3J 2E =62DE ae @E96C DE2E6D E92E 92G6 C6DEC:4E EC2?D86?56C >65:42= 42C6 7@C J@F?8 A6@A=6 DE2?5]k^Am

    kAmx? C6DA@?D6[ s6>@4C2E:4 =2H>2<6CD 😕 |2DD249FD6EED 2?5 @E96C 3=F6 DE2E6D >@G65 E@ D6E AC@E64E:@?D 7@C 86?56C EC62E>6?ED @C AC@465FC6D[ 😕 D@>6 42D6D 7@C >:?@CD[ 2C8F:?8 E96J 2C6 4C:E:42= E@ 2 49:=5’D 962=E9 42C6]k^Am

    kAmp “D9:6=5” 3:== D:8?65 3J v@G] |2FC2 w62=6J 😕 pF8FDE C6DEC:4ED DE2E6 286?4:6D 7C@> 4@@A6C2E:?8 H:E9 7656C2= @C @FE@7DE2E6 :?G6DE:82E:@?D @C :?BF:C:6D @7 “=682==J AC@E64E65 962=E9 42C6 24E:G:EJ]” xE 2=D@ 3=@42E:@? 23@FE 962=E9 42C6 AC@76DD:@?2=D H9@ AC@G:56 C6AC@5F4E:G6 2?5 86?56C277:C>:?8 42C6]k^Am

    [ad_2]

    By Christian M. Wade | Statehouse Reporter

    Source link

  • Salem honors Transgender Day of Remembrance & Resilience

    [ad_1]

    SALEM — In honor of Transgender Day of Remembrance & Resilience, elected officials and community members gathered at City Hall on Thursday to remember the lives of the 64 transgender people in the U.S. who have died in the past year.

    Transgender Day of Resilience, celebrated annually during Transgender Awareness Week Nov. 13-19, was established in 2014 with the Audre Lord Project and created by transgender people of color as a visionary and creative act of defiance to transform grief into love, hope, and strength.

    This page requires Javascript.

    Javascript is required for you to be able to read premium content. Please enable it in your browser settings.

    kAm|2J@C s@>:?:4< !2?82==@ 3682? E96 46C6>@?J H:E9 2 AC@4=2>2E:@? 564=2C:?8 %C2?D86?56C pH2C6?6DD (66< 😕 $2=6>[ 2D H6== 2D }@G] a_ 2D %C2?D86?56C s2J @7 #6>6>3C2?46]k^Am

    kAm“%9:D @3D6CG2?46 C6277:C>D @FC 4@==64E:G6 4@>>:E>6?E E@ E96 =:G:?8[ 2?5 9@?@C:?8 E9@D6 H6 92G6 =@DE 3J FA=:7E:?8 E96 A@H6C[ 4C62E:G:EJ 2?5 6?5FC2?46 @7 E96 EC2?D86?56C 4@>>F?:EJ[” !2?82==@ D2:5]k^Am

    kAm$49@@= r@>>:EE66 >6>36C py w@77>2? DA@<6 23@FE E96 :>A@CE2?46 @7 7:89E:?8 7@C E96 D276EJ 2?5 C:89ED @7 EC2?D86?56C 49:=5C6?[ C2E96C E92? 7@C4:?8 E96> E@ 25G@42E6 7@C E96>D6=G6D ;FDE E@ D64FC6 E96:C @H? C:89E E@ =:G6 2D E96:C 7F== D6=G6D]k^Am

    kAm“%@52J[ E96J H2?E E@ FD6 @FC 49:=5C6? 2D A2H?D[” 96 D2:5] “xE’D ?@E FA E@ 2 49:=5 E@ 36 E96 @?6D E@ 7:89E 7@C @FC C:89ED[ E96J 5@?’E 92G6 E96 49@:46[ 2?5 x’> ?@E 8@:?8 E@ DE2?5 7@C E92E] xE’D FDF2==J E96:C 4:D86?56C A2C6?ED E92E 2C6 D2J:?8[ ‘*6D[ x H2?E >J 49:=5 E@ 36 E96 7246 @7 E9:D 4@>>F?:EJ[’ 3FE :E’D ?@E E96:C ;@3] xE’D @FC ;@3 E@ DE2?5 FA[ 36 3C2G6[ 36 DEC@?8[ 36 H9@ H6 2C6[ 2?5 >2<6 E96 @E96CD F?4@>7@CE23=6]”k^Am

    kAm$:?46 a_`b[ E96C6 92G6 366? 2E =62DE bhh 42D6D @7 72E2= G:@=6?46 282:?DE EC2?D86?56C 2?5 86?56C ?@?4@?7@C>:?8 A6@A=6[ H:E9 E96 ?F>36C =:<6=J 36:?8 9:896C[ 2D >2?J @7 E96 42D6D 8@ F?C6A@CE65 @C >:DC6A@CE65[ 244@C5:?8 E@ E96 wF>2? #:89ED r2>A2:8? u@F?52E:@?]k^Am

    kAm(2C5 a r@F?4:=@C r2C@=:?6 (2ED@?u6=E DA@<6 23@FE E96 :>A@CE2?46 @7 =6G6C28:?8 E96 D25?6DD 2?5 =@DD 6IA6C:6?465 H:E9:? E96 4@>>F?:EJ E@ C6:?G:8@C2E6 E96 7:89E 7@C 6BF2= C:89ED]k^Am

    kAm“(96? x 4@?D:56C @FC EC2?D D:3=:?8D[ 7@C >6[ E96C6 2C6 2 ?F>36C @7 E9:?8D E92E 4@>6 7@CH2C5[” D96 D2:5] “xE’D :?4C65:3=6 H:D5@>[ DEC6?8E9[ 4@FC286[ 2?5 2? 6IAC6DD:@? @7 362FEJ :?D:56 2?5 @FE E92E x E9:?< 6G6CJ 9F>2? D9@F=5 2DA:C6 E@[ 2?5 x D66< E96:C H:D5@> 2?5 8F:52?46 😕 E96 H2J E92E x =625]k^Am

    kAm“pD =@?8 2D E96 7:89E 😀 DE:== ?646DD2CJ[ x H:== 36 E96C6 7:89E:?8 2=@?8D:56 J@F 2?5 7@C J@F] p?5 :7 J@F ?665 >6 😕 7C@?E @7 J@F[ x’== 5@ E92E[ E@@]”k^Am

    kAmv2CJ v:==[ 2=D@ ’D @77:4:2= 5C28 BF66? – DA@<6 23@FE E96 =@?8 FA9:== 32EE=6 D96 2?5 @E96C EC2?D86?56C A6@A=6 92G6 72465 😕 86EE:?8 G:D:3:=:EJ 7@C E96 >6>36CD @7 E96 4@>>F?:EJ H9@ 92G6 366? =@DE[ 2?5 E96 :>A@CE2?46 @7 6=64E65 @77:4:2=D 25G@42E:?8 7@C E96 EC2?D 4@>>F?:EJ]k^Am

    kAm“%96 =2DE 76H J62CD[ x 76=E =:<6 x 925 E@ 4C2> E9:D 5@H? E96 E9C@2E @7 E96 4:EJ @7 $2=6> E@ 6G6? 86E E9:D G:D:3:=:EJ[” D96 D2:5] “p?5 E92E’D H92E E9:D 😀 23@FE –G:D:3:=:EJ[ 2?5 E96 C6>6>3C2?46 @7 6G6CJ3@5J H9@ 92D D24C:7:465 E96:C @H? =:76 D@ H6 42? D:E 😕 E9:D C@@> E@86E96C 2?5 8:G6 @FC :562D 23@FE H92E H6 E9:?<]k^Am

    kAm“%92E’D H9J x’> 3J >JD6=7 >@DE @7 E96 E:>6 – 3642FD6 x’> ?@E 766=:?8 H6=4@>6 😕 E9:D 4@>>F?:EJ 6G6? 27E6C 6G6CJE9:?8 x’G6 5@?6 7@C E9:D 4:EJ] $@ x H2?E E@ D2J 4@?8C2EF=2E:@?D E@ E96 ?6H 4@F?4:=@CD] %2<6 E9:D 2?5 CF? H:E9 :E – =6E :E 36 J@FC 323J]”k^Am

    kAm%96 6G6?E 4@?4=F565 H:E9 C625:?8 E96 ?2>6D @7 E96 ec EC2?D86?56C A6@A=6 H9@ 92G6 366? =@DE D:?46 E96 =2DE %C2?D86?56C s2J @7 #6D:=:6?46]k^Am

    kAm“(6 >F?:EJ 😕 86?6C2= 😀 F?56C 2EE24<[ 2?5 46CE2:?=J E9:D 😀 2 E:>6 😕 H9:49 @FC 4@>>F?:EJ >FDE C2==J 2C@F?5 E96 >@DE GF=?6C23=6[” DE2E6 #6A] |2??J rCFK D2:5] “pD 2? 6=64E65 =6256C 2?5 2==J E@ E9:D 4@>>F?:EJ[ x 7:C>=J 36=:6G6 E92E H6 42?’E AF?49 5@H? H96? A@=:E:42= 6IA65:6?4J 364@>6D E96 ?@C>]k^Am

    kAm“x’> 8@:?8 E@ 4@?E:?F6 E@ H@C< H:E9 $6?] {@G6=J E@ 7:89E 7@C E9:?8D =:<6 86?56C277:C>:?8 42C6[ >2<:?8 DFC6 E92E @FC AF3=:4 D49@@=D 2C6 AC@E64E:?8 E96 AC:G24J 2?5 :?7@C>2E:@? @7 @FC DEF56?ED H9@ 2C6 EC2?D[ 2?5 6?DFC:?8 E92E H6 4C62E6 E96 DA246 E@ FA=:7E E9@D6 G@:46D]”k^Am

    kAm|:4926= |4wF89 42? 36 4@?E24E65 2E k2 9C67lQ>2:=E@i>>49F89o?@CE9@73@DE@?]4@>Qm>>49F89o?@CE9@73@DE@?]4@>k^2m @C 2E fg`fhhda_ak^Am

    [ad_2]

    By Michael McHugh | Staff Writer

    Source link

  • Senate to take up book ban restrictions

    [ad_1]

    BOSTON — The state Senate is poised to approve a plan to restrict efforts to ban books from public libraries and schools in response to a rise in challenges from parents and conservative groups.

    The “free expression” legislation, which cleared the Senate Ways and Means Committee on Thursday with bipartisan support, would make Massachusetts one of a handful of states to effectively outlaw book bans because of “personal, political or doctrinal” views by setting new restrictions on receiving state funding.


    This page requires Javascript.

    Javascript is required for you to be able to read premium content. Please enable it in your browser settings.

    kAm&?56C E96 AC@A@D2=[ D49@@= 5:DEC:4ED[ 492CE6C D49@@=D 2?5 =@42= 65F42E:@? 286?4:6D H@F=5 36 C6BF:C65 E@ 25@AE 2?5 AF3=:D9 2 HC:EE6? D49@@= =:3C2CJ A@=:4J E92E 8@G6C?D E96 D6=64E:@? 2?5 FD6 @7 =:3C2CJ >2E6C:2=D 2?5 @FE=:?6D AC@465FC6D 7@C C6DA@?5:?8 E@ 3@@< 492==6?86D]k^Am

    kAm{:3C2C:6D H@F=5 36 C6BF:C65 E@ 25@AE E96 p>6C:42? {:3C2CJ pDD@4:2E:@?’D {:3C2CJ q:== @7 #:89ED[ H9:49 564=2C6D E92E “>2E6C:2=D D9@F=5 ?@E 36 6I4=F565 3642FD6 @7 E96 @C:8:?[ 324<8C@F?5[ @C G:6HD @7 E9@D6 4@?EC:3FE:?8 E@ E96:C 4C62E:@?” @C 2 D:>:=2C A@=:4J]k^Am

    kAm%96 >62DFC6[ D=2E65 7@C 2 G@E6 }@G] `b 😕 E96 7F== $6?2E6[ H@F=5 DE:== ?665 E@ 36 2AAC@G65 3J E96 DE2E6 w@FD6 @7 #6AC6D6?E2E:G6D 2?5 DFCG:G6 v@G] |2FC2 w62=6J’D G6E@ A6? E@ 364@>6 =2H]k^Am

    kAmq24<6CD @7 E96 AC@A@D2=[ :?4=F5:?8 E96 |2DD249FD6EED $49@@= {:3C2CJ pDD@4:2E:@? 2?5 E96 |2DD249FD6EED {:3C2CJ pDD@4:2E:@?[ D2J E96 492?86D 2C6 2:>65 2E AFD9:?8 324< 2E 677@CED 3J A2C6?ED 2?5 4@?D6CG2E:G6 8C@FAD E@ C6>@G6 46CE2:? E:E=6D 7C@> D49@@=D 2?5 AF3=:4 =:3C2C:6D]k^Am

    kAm%9@D6 8C@FAD 92G6 4:E65 2? FAE:4< 😕 “3@@< 492==6?86D” 3J A2C6?E 8C@FAD[ 4@?D6CG2E:G6 @C82?:K2E:@?D 2?5 =2H>2<6CD H9@ H2?E E@ C6>@G6 46CE2:? 3@@ D49@@=D 2?5 =:3C2C:6D[ 6DA64:2==J E9@D6 562=:?8 H:E9 {vq%” 2?5 C24:2= E96>6D]k^Am

    kAm!t} p>6C:42[ 2 ?@?AC@7:E @C82?:K2E:@? 565:42E65 E@ 7C665@> @7 6IAC6DD:@?[ D2:5 >@C6 E92? `_[___ 3@@ a_ab E@ a_ac] p D:K23=6 49F?< @7 E96 3@@< 32?D E@@< A=246 😕 u=@C:52 2?5 x@H2 2D 3@E9 DE2E6D 6?7@C465 DH66A:?8 =2HD E2C86E:?8 4=2DDC@@> >2E6C:2=[ !t} D2:5]k^Am

    kAm“$E2E6 =68:D=2E:@? H2D 2=D@ A2CE:4F=2C=J 4C:E:42= 😕 2446=6C2E:?8 3@@< 32?D[ >2<:?8 :E 62D:6C E@ C6>@G6 3@@ D49@@=D H:E9@FE 5F6 AC@46DD[ @C 😕 D@>6 42D6D[ H:E9@FE 2?J 7@C>2= AC@46DD H92ED@6G6C[” E96 8C@FA D2:5 😕 2 C646?E C6A@CE]k^Am

    kAm|2DD249FD6EED =:3C2C:2?D D2J E96J 92G6 366? D66:?8 2? FAE:4< 😕 E96 ?F>36C @7 3@@< 492==6?86D 7C@> A2C6?ED 2?5 @FED:56 8C@FAD FAD6E H:E9 H92E E96J G:6H 2D :?2AAC@AC:2E6 4@?E6?E @? D6IF2=:EJ 2?5 C24:D> 7@C J@F?86C C6256CD]k^Am

    kAmr@?D6CG2E:G6 8C@FAD 2C8F6 E96J 2C6 ?@E =@@<:?8 E@ 32? 3@@@E:@?2= =62C?:?8 @G6C 2 EC25:E:@?2= 65F42E:@?[ 2?5 E96 :?EC@5F4E:@? @7 D6IF2==J 6IA=:4:E 3@@:55=6 2?5 9:89 D49@@= =:3C2C:6D]k^Am

    kAmqFE 4C:E:4D 4@?E6?5 E96 3@@< 492==6?86D 2C6 36:?8 5C:G6? =2C86=J 3J C24:D> 2?5 9@>@A9@3:2[ 2?5 2C6 92C>:?8 DEF56?ED 2?5 DE:7=:?8 7C66 DA6649]k^Am

    kAm~3D6CG6CD D2J 3@@< 32??:?8 92D 8@?6 7656C2= F?56C E96 %CF>A 25>:?:DEC2E:@?[ H:E9 E96 s6A2CE>6?E @7 s676?D6 C6>@G:?8 5:G6CD:EJ[ 6BF:EJ 2?5 :?4=FD:@? >2E6C:2=D 7C@> =:3C2C:6D @? >:=:E2CJ 32D6D E92E D6CG6 24E:G6 D6CG:46 >6>36CD]k^Am

    kAm%96 %CF>A 25>:?:DEC2E:@? D2:5 3@@65 E@ 36 😕 A@DD:3=6 G:@=2E:@? @7 E96 AC6D:56?E’D 6I64FE:G6 @C56CD E2C86E:?8 EC2?D86?56C A6@A=6 2?5 D@42==65 “C25:42= :?5@4EC:?2E:@?” @7 D49@@=49:=5C6? 92G6 366? C6>@G65 7C@> =:3C2CJ D96=G6D]k^Am

    kAmr9C:DE:2? |] (256 4@G6CD E96 |2DD249FD6EED $E2E69@FD6 7@C }@CE9 @7 q@DE@? |65:2 vC@FAUCDBF@jD ?6HDA2A6CD 2?5 H63D:E6D] t>2:= 9:> 2E k2 9C67lQ>2:=E@i4H256o4?9:?6HD]4@>Qm4H256o4?9:?6HD]4@>k^2m]k^Am

    [ad_2]

    By Christian M. Wade | Statehouse Reporter

    Source link

  • AGs sue over threats to pull sex ed funding

    [ad_1]

    BOSTON — Massachusetts is among a group of states suing the Trump administration over threats to pull federal sexual education funding from curricula focusing on gender identities.

    The lawsuit, filed Friday in the U.S. District Court in Oregon by Massachusetts Attorney General Andrea Campbell and 16 other Democrats, alleges that new conditions imposed by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services to receive the grant funding violate federal law, the separation of powers and Congress’ spending power.


    This page requires Javascript.

    Javascript is required for you to be able to read premium content. Please enable it in your browser settings.

    kAm%96 pvD 2C8F6 E96 25>:?:DEC2E:@? F?=2H7F==J H2?ED E96> E@ “C6HC:E6 D6IF2= 962=E9 4FCC:4F=2 E@ 6C2D6 6?E:C6 42E68@C:6D @7 DEF56?ED[” 2D A2CE @7 :ED =2E6DE 677@CE E@ E2C86E EC2?D86?56C J@FE9]k^Am

    kAm“&?:=2E6C2==J C6BF:C:?8 DE2E6D E@ C6>@G6 2== C676C6?46D E@ “86?56C :56@=@8J” — 2 G28F6[ F?567:?65[ 2?5 ?@?D6?D:42= E6C> — 2=D@ FDFCAD r@?8C6DD’ DA6?5:?8 A@H6C 2?5 G:@=2E6D E96 D6A2C2E:@? @7 A@H6CD[” E96J HC@E6] “%96 r@?DE:EFE:@? >2<6D 4=62C E92E :E 😀 r@?8C6DD[ ?@E E96 6I64FE:G6 3C2?49[ H9@ 4@?EC@=D E96 7656C2= 8@G6C?>6?E’D DA6?5:?8 2FE9@C:EJ]”k^Am

    kAmww$ H2?ED E@ AC@9:3:E E96 :?4=FD:@? @7 H92E :E 56D4C:36D 2D “86?56C :56@=@8J” 😕 =6DD@?D 7F?565 3J E96 !6CD@?2= #6DA@?D:3:=:EJ t5F42E:@? !C@8C2> 2?5 E96 %:E=6 ‘ $6IF2= #:D< pG@:52?46 t5F42E:@? AC@8C2>] q@E9 AC@8C2>D E6249 23DE:?6?46 2?5 4@?EC246AE:@? 7@C E96 AC6G6?E:@? @7 AC68?2?4J 2?5 D6IF2==J EC2?D>:EE65 :?764E:@?D]k^Am

    kAmr@>3:?65[ E96 E6C>:?2E:@? @7 7F?5:?8 F?56C E96 EH@ 7656C2= 8C2?E AC@8C2>D 4@F=5 C6DF=E 😕 2 =@DD @7 2E =62DE Sbd >:==:@? E@ E96 DE2E6D[ 244@C5:?8 E@ E96 pvD’ 4@>A=2:?E]k^Am

    kAm!C6D:56?E s@?2=5 %CF>A :DDF65 2? 6I64FE:G6 @C56C 😕 y2?F2CJ C6BF:C:?8 E96 7656C2= 8@G6C?>6?E E@ C64@8?:K6 @?=J EH@ D6I6D — >2=6 2?5 76>2=6 — 2?5 5:C64E65 7656C2= 286?4:6D E@ D4CF3 2?J >6?E:@?D @7 “86?56C :56@=@8J” 😕 4@?EC24ED[ 7656C2==J 7F?565 8C2?ED[ ;@3 56D4C:AE:@?D 2?5 D@4:2= >65:2 244@F?ED]k^Am

    kAmx? pF8FDE[ ww$ D6?E 2 =6EE6C E@ ce DE2E6D[ :?4=F5:?8 |2DD249FD6EED[ 56>2?5:?8 E96J C6>@G6 2== C676C6?46D E@ “86?56C :56@=@8J” 4@?E2:?65 😕 D6IF2= 65F42E:@? 4FCC:4F=2 2?5 >2E6C:2=D A2:5 7@C E9C@F89 E96 EH@ 7656C2==J 7F?565 D6I65 AC@8C2>D]k^Am

    kAm%96 5:C64E:G6[ :DDF65 E9C@F89 E96 286?4J’D p5>:?:DEC2E:@? 7@C r9:=5C6? 2?5 u2>:=:6D[ 82G6 DE2E6D e_ 52JD E@ C6G:D6 >2E6C:2=D FD65 😕 E96 !6CD@?2= #6DA@?D:3:=:EJ t5F42E:@? !C@8C2> @C C:D< =@D:?8 E96 7F?5D] %96 286?4J 42?46==65 2 S`a >:==:@? !#t! 8C2?E E@ r2=:7@C?:2 2D A2CE @7 E96 24E:@?D]k^Am

    kAm“p44@F?E23:=:EJ 😀 4@>:?8[” p4E:?8 pDD:DE2?E $64C6E2CJ p?5C6H vC25:D@? D2:5 😕 2 DE2E6>6?E 2E E96 E:>6] “u656C2= 7F?5D H:== ?@E 36 FD65 E@ A@:D@? E96 >:?5D @7 E96 ?6IE 86?6C2E:@? @C 25G2?46 52?86C@FD :56@=@8:42= 286?52D] %96 %CF>A p5>:?:DEC2E:@? H:== 6?DFC6 E92E !#t! C67=64ED E96 :?E6?E @7 r@?8C6DD[ ?@E E96 AC:@C:E:6D @7 E96 =67E]”k^Am

    kAm|2DD249FD6EED 86ED 23@FE S` >:==:@? 2??F2==J 7C@> E96 !#t! 8C2?E E@ 65F42E6 E66?286CD @? AC68?2?4J 2?5 AC6G6?E:?8 E96 DAC625 @7 D6IF2==J EC2?D>:EE65 :?764E:@?D]k^Am

    kAmr2>A36== D2:5 E96 %CF>A 25>:?:DEC2E:@? 😀 9@=5:?8 “E9:D 4C:E:42= 65F42E:@? 7F?5:?8 9@DE286 F?=6DD DE2E6D 28C66 E@ 6C2D6 EC2?D86?56C 2?5 ?@?3:?2CJ A6@A=6’D 6IA6C:6?46D 7C@> E96 4FCC:4F=F>]”k^Am

    kAm$96 D2:5 E96 >@G6 😀 F?=2H7F= 2?5 566A=J 92C>7F= E@ J@F?8 A6@A=6]k^Am

    kAm“tG6CJ DEF56?E 56D6CG6D E@ =62C? 😕 2? 6?G:C@?>6?E H96C6 E96:C :56?E:E:6D 2C6 C6DA64E65[ 2?5 @FC D49@@=D 92G6 2? @3=:82E:@? E@ AC@G:56 2 4@>AC696?D:G6 D6IF2= 65F42E:@? E92E DFAA@CED E96 962=E9 2?5 H6==36:?8 @7 2== DEF56?ED[ :?4=F5:?8 @FC {vq%”Z J@FE9[” r2>A36== D2:5 😕 2 DE2E6>6?E]k^Am

    kAm%96 @E96C A=2:?E:77D :?4=F56 r2=:7@C?:2[ ~C68@?[ (2D9:?8E@?[ |:??6D@E2[ r@=@C25@[ r@??64E:4FE[ s6=2H2C6[ w2H2::[ x==:?@:D[ |2CJ=2?5[ |2:?6[ |:49:82?[ }6H y6CD6J[ }6H *@C<[ #9@56 xD=2?5[ (:D4@?D:? 2?5 E96 s:DEC:4E @7 r@=F>3:2]k^Am

    kAmr9C:DE:2? |] (256 4@G6CD E96 |2DD249FD6EED $E2E69@FD6 7@C }@CE9 @7 q@DE@? |65:2 vC@FAUCDBF@jD ?6HDA2A6CD 2?5 H63D:E6D] t>2:= 9:> 2E k2 9C67lQ>2:=E@i4H256o4?9:?6HD]4@>Qm4H256o4?9:?6HD]4@>k^2m]k^Am

    [ad_2]

    By Christian M. Wade | Statehouse Reporter

    Source link

  • Activision Blizzard to pay $55 million to settle California civil-rights lawsuit

    Activision Blizzard to pay $55 million to settle California civil-rights lawsuit

    [ad_1]

    Videogame maker Activision Blizzard has agreed to pay nearly $55 million to settle a California civil-rights lawsuit brought over complaints of sexual harassment, discrimination and pay disparities by women employees that helped trigger the company’s acquisition by Microsoft.

    The settlement, announced by the California Civil Rights Department on Friday evening, resolves the lawsuit filed against the “Call of Duty” videogame studio by the agency in 2021 over claims that it “discriminated against women at the company, including by denying promotion opportunities and paying them less than men for doing substantially similar work,” CRD said.

    The agreement, subject to court approval, will see Activision pay nearly $46 million into a settlement fund dedicated to compensating women employees and contract workers at the company, plus more than $9 million in attorneys’ fees and costs. Additionally, Activision will take steps “to help ensure fair pay and promotion practices at the company,” including retaining an independent consultant to evaluate its compensation and promotion policies.

    Yet the settlement also sees CRD withdraw its initial claims alleging a culture of widespread, systemic workplace sexual harassment at Activision, according to a copy of the agreement provided to MarketWatch. The document notes that the department is filing an amended complaint that removes the sexual-harassment allegations against the company and focuses on the gender-based pay and promotion claims.

    CRD made no note of its prior sexual-harassment claims against Activision in its announcement Friday. A spokesperson for the department said the statement “largely speaks for itself with respect to the historic nature of this more than $50 million settlement agreement, which will bring direct relief and compensation to women who were harmed by the company’s discriminatory practices.

    Representatives for Activision declined to comment.

    The Wall Street Journal first reported the news of the settlement Friday.

    The California agency’s complaint was one of several high-profile investigations by both state and federal regulators in recent years into alleged workplace misconduct at Activision and failures by its leadership to respond appropriately. 

    While Activision repeatedly denied the allegations, they ramped up pressure on the Santa Monica, Calif.-based company and its CEO, Bobby Kotick, and eventually led to a $68.7 billion takeover bid by Microsoft
    MSFT,
    +1.31%

    in January 2022. The acquisition closed this October after receiving approval by U.K. and E.U. antitrust regulators, though the U.S. Federal Trade Commission continues to challenge the deal in court. Kotick is expected to leave the company, which he led for more than three decades, at the end of this year.

    The settlement would be the second-largest ever for the California Civil Rights Department, according to the Journal, after its $100 million agreement with another Los Angeles-area videogame developer, Riot Games, to resolve gender-discrimination allegations in 2021. The agency had initially sought a much-larger settlement with Activision, the publication reported, citing how the state had estimated the company’s liability at nearly $1 billion to some 2,500 employees with potential claims.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Breakthrough Women Fast Facts: Business, Education, US Government and Sports | CNN

    Breakthrough Women Fast Facts: Business, Education, US Government and Sports | CNN

    [ad_1]



    CNN
     — 

    Here is a look at women in business, education, government and sports who have broken through the glass ceiling and become the first in their respective positions in the United States.

    1739 – Elizabeth Timothy is the first woman newspaper publisher, of the South Carolina Gazette.

    1867-1919 – Madam C.J. Walker is the first woman to become a self-made millionaire. Her business develops and sells hair care products for Black women.

    1934 – Lettie Pate Whitehead is the first woman to serve as a director of a major corporation, the Coca-Cola Company.

    1967 – Isabel Benham is the first female partner at a Wall Street bond house, R.W. Pressprich & Co.

    1972 – Juanita Kreps becomes the first woman to serve as a director of the New York Stock Exchange. In 1977, she is the first woman appointed secretary of Commerce.

    1972 – Katharine Graham is the first woman to be CEO of a Fortune 500 company, the Washington Post.

    July 1999 – Carly Fiorina is the first woman to serve as CEO of a Fortune 20 company, Hewlett-Packard.

    October 1999 – Martha Stewart is the first woman to become a self-made billionaire. Her creative home brand includes books, a magazine, home furnishings and entertaining and gardening TV shows.

    2011 – Beth Mooney is the first woman to serve as CEO of a top 20 US bank, KeyCorp.

    2013 – Mary Barra is the first woman to serve as CEO of a major automaker, General Motors.

    September 10, 2020 – Citigroup names Jane Fraser as CEO, the first woman to lead a major US bank.

    December 12, 2022 – The Wall Street Journal names Emma Tucker as its next editor. Tucker will be the first woman to head the newspaper.

    1648 – Margaret Brent of Maryland appears before a court to request the right to vote. She is considered the first woman to practice law.

    July 16, 1840 – Catherine Brewer is the first in a group of 11 women to earn bachelor’s degrees, graduating from Wesleyan College in Macon, Georgia.

    1849 – Elizabeth Blackwell is the first woman to receive a medical degree. She earns a M.D. from the Geneva Medical College in New York.

    1866 – Lucy Hobbs is the first woman to receive a doctorate in dental surgery, graduating from the Ohio College of Dental Surgery.

    1869 – Arabella Mansfield is admitted to the Iowa State Bar, becoming the first woman admitted to a state bar.

    1870 – Ada Kepley graduates from Union College of Law in Chicago and is the first woman to earn a law degree.

    1873 – Ellen Swallow Richards, the first woman admitted to the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, earns a degree in chemistry.

    1877 – Helen Magill becomes the first woman to earn a Ph.D., when she graduates from Boston University.

    1872 – Victoria Claflin Woodhull becomes the first woman presidential candidate in the United States when she is nominated for the Equal Rights Party.

    April 4, 1887 – Susanna Madora Salter is the first woman elected mayor of a US town, Argonia, Kansas.

    1916 – Jeannette Rankin of Montana is the first woman elected to Congress. She serves just one term and then is elected again in 1940 for one term. During this time, she votes against participation in both World War I and World War II.

    November 21, 1922 – Rebecca Felton is the first woman to serve in the US Senate. She is appointed by Georgia’s governor who wanted to win over female voters after his initial opposition to the Nineteenth Amendment giving women the right to vote. She serves 24 hours in this temporary vacancy during the session break.

    January 5, 1925 – Nellie Tayloe Ross is the first woman to serve as a governor of a state, Wyoming. In May 1933, she also becomes the first woman to serve as director of the US Mint.

    1928 – Genevieve R. Cline is the first woman appointed as a US federal judge. She is nominated to the US Customs Court by President Calvin Coolidge.

    1932 – Hattie Wyatt Caraway is the first woman elected to the US Senate. She wins a special election after taking her late husband’s seat by appointment. She serves Arkansas in the Senate for nearly 14 years.

    1933 – Frances Perkins is the first woman to be appointed US secretary of labor, making her the first woman to serve on a presidential cabinet. She is largely responsible for crafting much of President Franklin D. Roosevelt’s “New Deal” labor and Social Security legislation.

    1948 – Margaret Chase Smith of Maine is the first woman to win election to both houses of Congress. (She was elected to the House in 1940.) Her landmark legislation is the Armed Services Integration Act (giving women in the military full status).

    June 21, 1949 – Georgia Neese Clark is the first woman to be named Treasurer of the United States. She is appointed by President Harry S. Truman.

    1949 – Helen “Eugenie” Anderson is the first woman to serve as a United States ambassador. Under President Truman, Anderson serves as the ambassador to Denmark. Later, she also becomes the first woman to sign a diplomatic treaty, and the first woman to sit on the United Nations Security Council.

    1960 – Oveta Culp Hobby becomes the first secretary of health, education, and welfare. Later, she is also the first director of the Women’s Army Auxiliary Corps (WAAC) and the first woman to receive the US Army Distinguished Service Medal.

    1964 – Margaret Chase Smith is the first woman placed in nomination for president of the United States by a major political party. At the Republican National Convention, she loses the nomination to Barry Goldwater.

    1977 – Juanita Kreps is the first woman appointed secretary of commerce. In 1972, she was the first woman to serve as a director of the New York Stock Exchange.

    December 6, 1979 – Shirley Hufstedler is sworn in as the first secretary of Education.

    September 25, 1981 – Sandra Day O’Connor takes her seat as the first woman on the US Supreme Court. She was appointed by President Ronald Reagan.

    1983 – Elizabeth Dole becomes the first woman to serve as secretary of Transportation.

    1984 – Geraldine Ferraro is the first woman nominated for vice president of the United States by a major party, at the Democratic National Convention in San Francisco.

    1990 – Dr. Antonia Novello is the first woman (and the first Hispanic person) to be appointed as US surgeon general.

    January 21, 1993 – Hazel R. O’Leary is confirmed as the first woman to serve as US secretary of energy. She’s also the first African American to serve in that role.

    March 11, 1993 – Janet Reno is confirmed as the first woman to serve as US attorney general.

    August 5, 1993 – Sheila Widnall is confirmed by the Senate to serve as secretary of the Air Force, the first woman to serve as secretary of a branch of the US military.

    January 23, 1997 – Madeleine Albright is sworn in as the first woman to serve as US secretary of state. She was nominated by President Bill Clinton.

    December 17, 2000-2005 – Condoleezza Rice is the first woman to serve as national security adviser, to President George W. Bush.

    January 2001 – Gale Norton becomes the first woman to serve as US secretary of the interior, and Ann Veneman is the first woman to serve as US secretary of agriculture. Both were nominated by President George W. Bush.

    2001 – Fran Mainella is the first woman to be appointed director of the US National Park Service.

    2007 – Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) becomes the first woman to serve as speaker of the House of Representatives.

    2008 – Sarah Palin is the first woman to run for vice president as a Republican.

    2008 – Ann Dunwoody is the first woman to receive a rank of four-star general in the US Army.

    2009 – Janet Napolitano becomes the first woman to serve as US secretary of homeland security. Previously, Napolitano had been the first female chair of the National Governors Association and the first woman to serve as the attorney general of Arizona.

    February 2014 – Janet Yellen becomes the first woman to chair the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.

    September 2014 – Megan Smith is the first woman to be appointed as US chief technology officer.

    February 2015 – Megan Brennan becomes the first woman to serve as US postmaster general.

    May 13, 2016 – Air Force General Lori Robinson is appointed to lead US Northern Command, becoming the nation’s first female combatant commander.

    July 26, 2016 – Hillary Clinton is the first US woman to lead the ticket of a major party. She secures the Democratic nomination at the national convention in Philadelphia.

    September 14, 2016 – Carla Hayden is sworn in as the first female librarian of Congress.

    May 17, 2018 – Gina Haspel is confirmed as the first female director of the CIA.

    December 7, 2018 – Beth Kimber becomes the first woman to lead the CIA’s Directorate of Operations.

    June 29, 2019 – Maj. Gen. Laura Yeager becomes the first woman to lead a US Army infantry division.

    December 31, 2020 – Pelosi’s office announces the appointment of Rear Adm. Margaret Grun Kibben as chaplain of the House of Representatives — the first woman to serve in the role in either chamber.

    January 25, 2021 – Janet Yellen is confirmed as the first female Treasury secretary.

    October 19, 2021 – Dr. Rachel Levine is sworn in as the first female four-star admiral for the US Public Health Service Commissioned Corps. Levine is also the first openly transgender four-star officer across the nation’s eight uniformed services.

    January 20, 2021 – Kamala Harris is sworn in as vice president of the United States, making her America’s first female, first Black and first South Asian vice president.

    November 19, 2021 – US President Joe Biden temporarily transfers power to Harris while he is under anesthesia for a routine colonoscopy. Harris becomes the first woman with presidential power.

    December 15, 2021 Keechant Sewell is selected as the next New York City police commissioner, leading the nation’s largest police department. She becomes the first woman to lead the NYPD in its 176-year history. Her appointment begins in January 2022.

    December 1, 2022 – Admiral Linda Fagan becomes the first woman to lead a branch of the armed forces, as the 27th commandant of the US Coast Guard.

    November 2, 2023 – Admiral Lisa Franchetti becomes the first woman to lead the Navy and the first woman in the Joint Chiefs of Staff.

    READ MORE: Women Presidential and Vice Presidential Candidates: A Selected List from the Center for American Women and Politics.

    1997 – Dee Kantner and Violet Palmer become the first women to serve as referees in the NBA.

    April 8, 2015 – Sarah Thomas becomes the first female to be a full-time NFL referee.

    February 2, 2020 – Katie Sowers, offensive assistant for the San Francisco 49ers football team, becomes the first woman to coach in the Super Bowl.

    July 20, 2020 – Alyssa Nakken, the first female coach on a Major League Baseball staff in league history, becomes the first woman to coach on the field during a major league game. Nakken coached first base during an exhibition game between the San Francisco Giants and Oakland A’s.

    November 13, 2020 – The Miami Marlins announce the hiring of Kim Ng as the team’s new general manager, making her the first woman GM in Major League Baseball history. She is believed to be the first woman hired as a GM to lead a professional men’s sports team in any North American major league.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Janet Napolitano Fast Facts | CNN

    Janet Napolitano Fast Facts | CNN

    [ad_1]



    CNN
     — 

    Here’s a look at the life of the former Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security, Janet Napolitano.

    Birth date: November 29, 1957

    Birth place: New York, New York

    Birth name: Janet Ann Napolitano

    Father: Leonard Michael Napolitano, anatomy professor and Dean, University of New Mexico School of Medicine

    Mother: Jane Marie (Winer) Napolitano

    Education: Santa Clara University, B.S., 1979; University of Virginia, J.D., 1983

    Grew up in Pennsylvania and New Mexico.

    First female valedictorian at Santa Clara University in California.

    Lifetime member of the Girl Scouts of America.

    Enjoys hiking and tennis.

    Is a big fan of Arizona professional basketball and baseball teams.

    Founder and faculty director of the Center for Security in Politics at the University of California, Berkeley.

    1983-1984 – Law clerk for Judge Mary Schroeder of the US Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

    1984-1993 – Associate, and later partner at Lewis & Roca in Phoenix.

    1991 – Member of the legal team representing Anita Hill during the sexual harassment investigation of US Supreme Court nominee Clarence Thomas.

    1993-1997 – US Attorney for the District of Arizona.

    1999-2002 – Attorney General of Arizona. She is the first woman to hold this position.

    July 25, 2000 – Undergoes a successful mastectomy on her right breast for cancer.

    January 6, 2003-January 21, 2009 – The first Democrat in 12 years to be governor of Arizona.

    August 7, 2006-July 23, 2007 – First female chair of the National Governors Association.

    December 1, 2008 – President-elect Barack Obama nominates Napolitano to be the Secretary of Homeland Security.

    January 15, 2009 – Napolitano’s confirmation hearing before the Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee begins.

    January 21, 2009 – The third Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security, and the first woman to hold the position.

    July 12, 2013 – Announces her resignation.

    September 6, 2013 – Napolitano leaves the Department of Homeland Security.

    September 30, 2013 – Becomes the 20th, and first female president of the University of California.

    May 17, 2016 – The Department of Homeland Security hosts an official portrait unveiling ceremony honoring Napolitano. The portrait is displayed in the Department of Homeland Security Headquarters in Washington.

    January 16, 2017 – Napolitano is hospitalized, suffering side effects from cancer treatment. She was diagnosed with cancer last August.

    October 26, 2017 – Napolitano announces the National Center for Free Speech and Civic Engagement. The new endeavor hopes to facilitate a “concerted educational, research and advocacy effort that will center on the First Amendment’s critical importance to American democracy.” Napolitano will chair the center which will be housed at the University of California’s Washington, DC location.

    March 26, 2019 – Napolitano’s book co-authored with Karen Breslau, “How Safe Are We?: Homeland Security Since 9/11,” is published.

    September 18, 2019 – Announces that she will step down as president of the University of California in August 2020. After a sabbatical, she will continue in her position at the Goldman School of Public Policy at UC Berkeley, where she is a tenured professor.

    May 4, 2022 – President Joe Biden appoints Napolitano to the President’s Intelligence Advisory Board.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Dianne Feinstein, longest-serving female US senator in history, dies at 90 | CNN Politics

    Dianne Feinstein, longest-serving female US senator in history, dies at 90 | CNN Politics

    [ad_1]


    Washington
    CNN
     — 

    Dianne Feinstein, whose three decades in the Senate made her the longest-serving female US senator in history, has died following months of declining health. She was 90.

    Feinstein’s death, confirmed to CNN by a source familiar, will hand California Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom the power to appoint a lawmaker to serve out the rest of Feinstein’s term, keeping the Democratic majority in the chamber through early January 2025. In March 2021, Newsom publicly said he had a list of “multiple” replacements and pledged to appoint a Black woman if Feinstein, a Democrat, were to retire.

    News of Feinstein’s death also comes as federal funding is set to expire, as Congress is at an impasse as to how to avoid a government shutdown, though Senate Democrats still retain a majority without her.

    Feinstein, a former mayor of San Francisco, was a leading figure in California politics for decades and became a national face of the Democratic Party following her first election to the US Senate in 1992. She broke a series of glass ceilings throughout her political career and her influence was felt strongly in some of Capitol Hill’s most consequential works in recent history, including the since-lapsed federal assault weapons ban in 1994 and the 2014 CIA torture report. She also was a longtime force on the Senate Intelligence and Judiciary committees.

    In her later years, Feinstein’s health was the subject of increasing scrutiny and speculation, and the California Democrat was prominent among aging lawmakers whose decisions to remain in office drew scrutiny, especially in an age of narrow party margins in Congress.

    A hospitalization for shingles in February led to an extended absence from the Senate – stirring complaints from Democrats, as Feinstein’s time away slowed the confirmation of Democratic-appointed judicial nominees – and when she returned to Capitol Hill three months later, it was revealed that she had suffered multiple complications during her recovery, including Ramsay Hunt syndrome and encephalitis. A fall in August briefly sent her to the hospital.

    Feinstein, who was the Senate’s oldest member at the time of her death, also faced questions about her mental acuity and ability to lead. She dismissed the concerns, saying, “The real question is whether I’m still an effective representative for 40 million Californians, and the record shows that I am.”

    But heavy speculation that Feinstein would retire instead of seek reelection in 2024 led several Democrats to announce their candidacies for her seat – even before she announced her plans. In February, she confirmed that she would not run for reelection, telling CNN, “The time has come.”

    Feinstein was fondly remembered by her colleagues on Friday.

    Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer told reporters that he will address Feinstein’s death on the Senate floor later Friday morning, calling it a “very, very sad day for all of us.” North Carolina Republican Sen. Thom Tillis called her a “trailblazer” and Democratic Sen. Dick Durbin of Illinois said “she was always a lady but she never backed down from a cause that she thought was worth fighting for.”

    “We lost one of the great ones,” Durbin said.

    San Francisco native and leader

    Feinstein was born in San Francisco in 1933 and graduated from Stanford University in 1955. After serving as a San Francisco County supervisor, Feinstein became the city’s mayor in 1978 in the wake of the assassination of Mayor George Moscone and Supervisor Harvey Milk, the first openly gay politician from California to be elected to office.

    Feinstein rarely talked about the day when Moscone and Milk were shot but she opened up about the tragic events in a 2017 interview with CNN’s Dana Bash.

    Feinstein was on the San Francisco Board of Supervisors then, and assassin Dan White had been a friend and colleague of hers.

    “The door to the office opened, and he came in, and I said, ‘Dan?’ ”

    “I heard the doors slam, I heard the shots, I smelled the cordite,” Feinstein recalled.

    It was Feinstein who announced the double assassination to the public. She was later sworn in as the first female mayor of San Francisco.

    Her political career was marked by a series of historic firsts.

    By that time she became mayor in 1978, she had already broken one glass ceiling, becoming the first female chair of the San Francisco Board of Supervisors.

    California’s first woman sent to the US Senate racked up many other firsts in Washington. Among those: She was the first woman to sit on the Senate Judiciary Committee, the first female chairwoman of the Senate Rules and Administration Committee, and the first female chair of the Senate Intelligence Committee.

    Feinstein also served on the powerful Senate Appropriations Committee and held the title of ranking member of the Senate Judiciary Committee from 2017 to 2021. In November 2022, she was poised to become president pro tempore of the Senate – third in line to the presidency – but declined to pursue the position, citing her husband’s recent death.

    Feinstein reflected on her experience as a woman in politics in her 2017 interview with Bash, saying, “Look, being a woman in our society even today is difficult,” and noting, “I know it in the political area.” She would later note in a statement the week she became the longest-serving woman in US history, “We went from two women senators when I ran for office in 1992 to 24 today – and I know that number will keep climbing.”

    “It has been a great pleasure to watch more and more women walk the halls of the Senate,” Feinstein said in November 2022.

    Led efforts on gun control and torture program investigations

    Though she was a proud native of one of the most famously liberal cities in the country, Feinstein earned a reputation over the years in the Senate as someone eager to work across the aisle with Republicans, and at times sparked pushback and criticism from progressives.

    “I truly believe that there is a center in the political spectrum that is the best place to run something when you have a very diverse community. America is diverse; we are not all one people. We are many different colors, religions, backgrounds, education levels, all of it,” she told CNN in 2017.

    A biography from Feinstein’s Senate office states that her notable achievements include “the enactment of the federal Assault Weapons Ban in 1994, a law that prohibited the sale, manufacture and import of military-style assault weapons” (the ban has since lapsed), and the influential 2014 torture report, a comprehensive “six-year review of the CIA’s detention and interrogation program,” which brought to light for the first time many details from the George W. Bush-era program.

    Feinstein’s high-profile Senate career made its mark on pop culture when she was portrayed by actress Annette Bening in the 2019 film “The Report,” which tackled the subject of the CIA’s use of torture after the Sept. 11 attacks and the effort to make those practices public.

    In November 2020, Feinstein announced that she would step down from the top Democratic spot on the Senate Judiciary Committee the following year in the wake of sharp criticism from liberal activists over her handling of the hearings for then-President Donald Trump’s Supreme Court nominee Amy Coney Barrett.

    While Democratic senators could not block Barrett’s nomination in the Republican-led Senate on their own, liberal activists were angry when Feinstein undermined Democrats’ relentless attempt to portray the process as illegitimate when she praised then-Judiciary Chairman and South Carolina Republican Lindsey Graham’s leadership of it.

    Feinstein said at the time that she would continue to serve as a senior Democrat on the Judiciary, Intelligence, Appropriations, and Rules and Administration panels, working on priorities like gun safety, criminal justice and immigration.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Disgraced football chief Luis Rubiales resigns over World Cup kiss scandal

    Disgraced football chief Luis Rubiales resigns over World Cup kiss scandal

    [ad_1]

    Spain’s suspended football federation President Luis Rubiales announced his resignation Sunday, citing the intense public criticism he’s received after forcibly kissing footballer Jenni Hermoso at the Women’s World Cup final.

    “I do not want Spanish football to be negatively impacted by this disproportionate campaign,” Rubiales wrote in a statement sent to the media shortly after he presented his resignation to acting federation President Pedro Rocha on Sunday night.

    Rubiales’ resignation statement was distributed at the same time that journalist Piers Morgan published a clip of an upcoming interview in which Rubiales confirms his resignation and said his father had urged him to step down in order to preserve his dignity.

    Last month Rubiales ignited a firestorm with his actions at the World Cup final, which kicked off a wider conversation about sexism in Spanish society. For several weeks the country’s top politicians and the heads of Spain’s regional football federations have been calling for Rubiales to stand down.

    Rubiales said that his suspension by global football governing body FIFA’s disciplinary committee and the launch of a sexual assault investigation into his actions by Spain’s National Court had convinced him that he would not be able to remain in his post, and that his insisting on doing so would only harm the federation and football in general.

    The football chief asserted that he had done nothing wrong and said that he had “faith in the truth and a determination to do everything to make sure that it prevails.”

    “My daughters, my family and the people I love the most have suffered the effects of an excessive persecution, as well as many lies, but with every day that passes the truth is taking hold on the street,” he added.

    [ad_2]

    Aitor Hernández-Morales

    Source link

  • Spain football chief says sorry for kissing World Cup winner on the lips

    Spain football chief says sorry for kissing World Cup winner on the lips

    [ad_1]

    Spanish football boss Luis Rubiales apologized Monday afternoon amid public and political outcry after he gave Spain’s midfielder and Women’s World Cup winner Jenni Hermoso an unwelcome kiss on the lips after she received her medal onstage after her team’s victory Sunday.

    While Rubiales said in a statement he thought the furor was “idiotic,” the Royal Spanish Football Federation president appeared in a video posted to social media on Monday. “I have no choice but to apologize and to learn from this … and when representing the federation take more care,” Rubiales said.

    “Certainly I made a mistake and I have to acknowledge that. It was done without any ill intention in a moment of the highest exuberance. Here we saw it as natural and normal but outside it has caused a commotion,” he said.

    During the post-match locker room celebrations after Spain won the World Cup against England, Hermoso said on an Instagram Live video. “But what can I do? I didn’t like it, eh,” about the kiss.

    Rubiales was criticized widely by Spanish politicians and Equality Minister Irene Montero said it was a display of “sexual violence.” Spain’s minister of culture and sport, Miquel Iceta, said the kiss was “unacceptable” Monday on Spanish television.

    “We all deserve respect,” Iceta said.

    Rubiales — who kissed and vigorously hugged multiple Spanish players during the medal ceremony — also ended up under the microscope for what appeared to be a crotch-grabbing celebration in the stands during the game. During boisterous post-match celebrations Rubiales — after promising the champion team a holiday to Ibiza — also said that he would marry Hermoso there. 

    The storm comes against the backdrop of a long-running feud between the Spanish football establishment and its women players, 15 of whom wrote letters last September telling the association they were quitting the national team over the federation’s approach to running it and amid a dispute with the coach Jorge Vilda.

    While a handful, including Barcelona star player Aitana Bonmatí, eventually returned to the squad this year, some continued to strike and missed what turned out to be a triumphant World Cup campaign — though one which is unlikely to heal divisions inside Spanish women’s football.

    During the most-watched Women’s World Cup ever, Spain beat England 1-0 on Sunday in the final in Sydney thanks to a goal from Real Madrid’s Olga Carmona, who later found out that her father had died before the match took place.

    This story has been updated.

    [ad_2]

    Ali Walker

    Source link

  • Spain football chief to resign after kissing World Cup winner on the lips

    Spain football chief to resign after kissing World Cup winner on the lips

    [ad_1]

    Luis Rubiales will resign on Friday as president of the Spanish football federation, after he sparked international outrage by giving a nonconsensual kiss on the lips to a Spain player as she celebrated her team’s victory at the Women’s World Cup.

    The football boss will step down on Friday after a week of recriminations, as first reported by Spanish media Thursday evening and confirmed to POLITICO by a senior official.

    After Spain won the World Cup final against England on Sunday, Rubiales grabbed Spain’s midfielder Jenni Hermoso and planted a kiss on her lips during the medal ceremony and later joked that he would take the team to Ibiza and marry Hermoso there.

    Hermoso said on an Instagram Live video after, “But what can I do? I didn’t like it, eh.”

    Rubiales made a half-hearted attempt to apologize, saying his actions had no “ill intentions” and happened in a “moment of the highest exuberance.” But his apologies were not enough for Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez, who slammed Rubiales and also called his actions “unacceptable.”

    Rubiales also appeared to grab his crotch during the match in boisterous celebrations.

    In the aftermath of the kiss, Spanish politicians widely criticized Rubiales. Equality Minister Irene Montero said the kiss was a display of “sexual violence.” Minister of Culture and Sport Miquel Iceta added it was “unacceptable.”

    After the incident, Rubiales called an emergency meeting of the football federation’s general assembly on Friday, where he is now expected to resign, which was first reported Thursday by Spain’s Cadena Ser.

    The Spanish football federation launched an internal investigation into whether Rubiales breached their protocol against sexism, while the global football association FIFA opened disciplinary proceedings against him Thursday.

    During the most-watched Women’s World Cup ever, Spain beat England 1-0 on Sunday in the final in Sydney thanks to a goal from Real Madrid’s Olga Carmona.

    [ad_2]

    Ali Walker and Claudia Chiappa

    Source link

  • Spanish football chief refuses to resign over World Cup kiss

    Spanish football chief refuses to resign over World Cup kiss

    [ad_1]

    Luis Rubiales, the president of Spain’s football federation, dramatically refused to resign on Friday, using a fiery speech to lambast those who criticized him for kissing a Women’s World Cup winner on the lips.

    “I will fight until the end. I hope the law is enforced. The press neither seeks justice nor seeks the truth,” Rubiales blasted on Friday afternoon. “I am not going to resign, I am not going to resign.”

    The embattled football boss was expected to resign Friday, after a week of outcry that followed his nonconsensual kiss of Jenni Hermoso in Sydney on Sunday in full view of millions watching around the world.

    Rubiales told an enthusiastic audience composed of some of Spain’s highest-ranking football officials that the kiss — which he characterized as “a mere peck … the kind I would give my daughters” — had been consensual, with Hermoso agreeing after he proposed it.

    He went on to blame Hermoso for contributing to his “social assassination” by initially remaining silent and later issuing a press release calling for more measures to fight sexual harassment in Spanish football.

    Rubiales had come under fire from senior Spanish politicians, including Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez.

    But on Friday, Rubiales claimed he was a victim of “false feminism” and of politicians aiming to vilify him. He said equality was not about balancing men with women, but truth and lies. He specifically named Spain’s caretaker deputy prime minister, Yolanda Díaz, and Equality Minister Irene Montero as his persecutors and said that he would seek legal action against those who had criticized him.

    This story is being updated.

    [ad_2]

    Ali Walker and Aitor Hernández-Morales

    Source link

  • Nikki Haley’s gender is rarely mentioned on the campaign trail but always present | CNN Politics

    Nikki Haley’s gender is rarely mentioned on the campaign trail but always present | CNN Politics

    [ad_1]



    CNN
     — 

    When Nikki Haley took the Republican presidential debate stage alongside her seven male rivals last month, she shone a spotlight on her gender only once – evoking a former British prime minister.

    “This is exactly why Margaret Thatcher said, ‘If you want something said, ask a man; if you want something done, ask a woman,’” the former South Carolina governor interjected as Chris Christie and Vivek Ramaswamy sparred during the Milwaukee debate.

    Haley, the only female competitor in the GOP race, has not made her gender central to her campaign pitch. Instead, she has zeroed in on the need for a new generation of leadership.

    Republican voters who are considering supporting Haley told CNN they welcome the fact that she doesn’t lead with her gender as she campaigns, but many said her experience as a mother and a military spouse were part of her appeal.

    “It’s not necessary to point out that a female would bring a fresh perspective,” said Melinda Tourangeau, a Republican voter from New Hampshire. “She has one, she’s nailing it and I think that stands on its own merits.”

    GOP strategists say that by simply showing up as who she is, and weaving elements of her gender into her pitch, Haley is likely to boost her support among suburban female voters – a constituency that helped fuel President Joe Biden’s victory in 2020.

    “There’s no need for her to light her hair on fire and [stress] the fact that she’s a woman because she uses her ability and experience as a way to connect with voters,” said GOP strategist Alice Stewart, a CNN political commentator who advised former Minnesota Rep. Michele Bachmann on her 2012 presidential bid. “What suburban women want is a candidate that’s going to speak the truth, and Nikki Haley is out there being truthful about Donald Trump’s record. She’s being truthful about what we can actually accomplish in the future on abortion.”

    When Haley, a former US ambassador to the United Nations under Trump, speaks on the campaign trail about personal experiences that have informed her policy positions, she underscores her identity as a mother, wife and female politician.

    “I am pro-life because my husband was adopted, and I live with that blessing every day. I am pro-life because we had trouble having both of our children,” Haley has said in explaining her stance on abortion.

    She expanded on that position at the Milwaukee debate last month in calling for a “respectful” approach to the divisive topic.

    “Can’t we all agree that we should ban late-term abortions?” Haley said. “And can’t we all agree that we are not going to put a woman in jail or give her the death penalty if she gets an abortion?”

    Haley also spoke of the difficulty of enacting a federal abortion ban, pointing to the difficulty in overcoming the Senate’s 60-vote threshold to break a filibuster.

    It was a nuanced perspective for a GOP candidate, and one that caught voters’ attention.

    “When she talked about abortion, I liked that because although she is totally pro-life, she is willing to make some concessions because she said it’s not about her. It’s about what the country thinks,” a female GOP voter from South Carolina told CNN after the debate. “She’s trying to meet people where they are or at least do away with late-term abortions and things like that.”

    Hear Nikki Haley answer questions about abortion

    Haley’s campaign said it raised more than $1 million in less than 72 hours following that first primary debate. The campaign also said it raised more online in the 24 hours after the debate than it had on any other day since Haley launched her presidential bid in February.

    GOP strategists believe that Haley’s approach to the abortion issue was a key factor in that surged interest.

    “I think there are two key issues that she addressed on the debate stage that are helping in fueling their fundraising drive, and the nuanced position on abortion is one and her strong support for Israel,” Stewart said.

    In her stump speeches, Haley also draws from personal experiences – highlighting her role as mother – to speak against the participation of transgender girls in girls’ sports.

    “The idea that we have biological boys playing in girls’ sports, it is the women’s issue of our time,” she said during a CNN town hall in June. “My daughter ran track in high school. I don’t even know how I would have that conversation with her.”

    Similarly, when Haley speaks about standing up for veterans’ families, she speaks about her husband, Michael Haley, a major in the South Carolina National Guard whose brigade deployed to Africa earlier this year in support of the United States Africa Command. He previously served in Afghanistan in 2013 when his wife was serving as governor, which meant she was a working mom alone at home with two children.

    “The first three months when he deployed to Afghanistan, one of them was crying every night,” Haley said at the Iowa State Fair this summer. “I feel for every military family out there because it is survival mode.”

    When asked about her gender, Haley’s campaign noted that it is a part of who she is but not her only defining trait.

    “Nikki is proud to be a woman, a military spouse, a mom, a governor, an ambassador, and an accountant. All these experiences make her the tough and honest leader she is. She brought this toughness to the establishment as South Carolina governor. She brought it to the UN when she took on the world’s dictators. And she will bring it to the White House,” campaign spokesperson Olivia Perez-Cubas said in a statement.

    Haley is the fifth prominent Republican woman to run for president, following Margaret Chase Smith in 1964; Elizabeth Dole, who dropped out before the 2000 primaries; Bachmann in 2012; and Carly Fiorina in 2016.

    In comparison to Haley, Fiorina spoke more often and more directly about her gender. That move was dictated, at least in part, by Trump attacking her looks and the leading opposition candidate also being a woman.

    “[Whether] or not you’re ready to … support me, in your heart of hearts, every single one of you know you would love to see me debate Hillary Clinton,” Fiorina told voters on the stump.

    Haley’s competition this cycle is different, and so is her tact.

    “She is a woman, but she leads with her merit and experience,” said Iowa state Sen. Chris Cournoyer, a Haley supporter who touted the fact that the former governor does not play the “woman card.”

    At an August event in New Hampshire for female Republican voters, Haley’s identity as a woman was celebrated.

    “Nikki Haley is an empowered woman, who empowers women, and she really gets it as a former state representative,” Elizabeth Girard, the president of the New Hampshire Federation of Republican Women, said as she introduced Haley, who served three terms in the South Carolina House prior to her election as governor.

    SE CUpp unfiltered 0216

    SE Cupp: Nikki Haley promises youth, but will her policies reflect that?

    But when Haley took the stage – facing a gaggle of female voters – she didn’t tailor her message to the audience. She ticked through her regular stump speech, closing out with her signature call for a new generational leader and a candidate who can win the general election.

    Many of the potential female voters in the room that day appreciated Haley’s approach.

    “I think that’s a good thing,” Kim Rice, 50, told CNN after the event when asked about Haley not making her gender a focus of her pitch. “I don’t think that should be the reason people vote for her. I think her policy points are her strongest points. That’s what should draw people to her.”

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Queen Latifah Says Female Leaders Must Do These Four Things If They Want To Succeed | Entrepreneur

    Queen Latifah Says Female Leaders Must Do These Four Things If They Want To Succeed | Entrepreneur

    [ad_1]

    Opinions expressed by Entrepreneur contributors are their own.

    The good news is that, according to the U.S. Census Bureau, women-owned employer firms account for more than a third of all U.S. employer-owned firms and revenues at these women-owned businesses have grown almost 52% between 2012 and 2019 compared to a 34% rise in firms owned by men.

    The bad news? Females are still struggling to get investment dollars. According to a recent study conducted by the research site Pitchbook, U.S. startups with all-women teams received 1.9% (or around $4.5 billion) out of around the $238.3 billion in venture capital allocated in 2022.

    [ad_2]

    Gene Marks

    Source link

  • Equality vs. Equity: What’s the Difference? Here’s What to Know | Entrepreneur

    Equality vs. Equity: What’s the Difference? Here’s What to Know | Entrepreneur

    [ad_1]

    Opinions expressed by Entrepreneur contributors are their own.

    DEI is the most common acronym in the diversity space. D for diversity, E for equity — not equality — and I for inclusion. Why the difference?

    Equality suggests that treating everyone equally will solve the diversity problem, yet that has resulted in little to no change. Equity by contrast is about meeting the needs of individuals that are systemically marginalized because of factors outside their control — race, ethnicity, class, age or gender most commonly — yet many more.

    There are three key differences between equity and equality. Equity means:

    1. Providing resources to those that need them the most first
    2. Educating the majority group on their role in inclusion
    3. Proactively communicating the importance that DEI is not a zero-sum game

    Related: 18 Business Leaders on Creating an Inclusive and Equitable Society

    Provide resources to those that need them the most first

    Equity is about putting the needs of those most marginalized first. That means those that have been systemically disadvantaged due to their gender identity, race, ethnicity or other dimensions of diversity are prioritized with resource allocation. Resources such as education, mentorship opportunities and sponsorship need to be allocated to those that reflect the general population. Unfortunately, resources are often overallocated to the majority group that already holds the most privilege and proxy to power, reinforcing the status quo.

    Examples of resource allocation are programs inclusive development programs that amplify the skills and voices of people of color, mentorship programs that target underrepresented demographics with access to senior leaders and sponsorship programs that ensure that people’s work is equitably recognized. Too often, promotion and representation rates dwindle for women, people of color, those with disabilities and the LGBTQ+ community. Equity seeks to right that wrong.

    Educate the majority group on their role in inclusion

    However, these programs will fail if the majority group doesn’t understand their role in facilitating an inclusive environment where diverse talent can thrive. Often the majority group has not had the lived experiences of being part of a marginalized group and so they lack the context and understanding to be helpful.

    Panel discussions that bring to life the real experiences of underrepresented groups in a thoughtful pragmatic way can help bridge the gap. In addition, proven resources, documentaries, books and podcasts can help the majority group understand the nuances of inclusion.

    It is likely leaders will make mistakes in the DEI conversation. Having tools and resources is critical for the majority group to proactively avoid some of these likely missteps.

    • Tokenism: Tokenism occurs when individuals or organizations make superficial efforts to include diverse individuals or groups without genuinely valuing their contributions. It is important to go beyond representation and create inclusive environments where everyone’s voice is heard and respected.
    • One-size-fits-all approach: Another mistake is assuming that DEI initiatives can be applied universally without considering the specific needs and experiences of different groups. It is important to recognize and address the unique challenges faced by various communities and tailor strategies accordingly.
    • Failure to address systemic issues: DEI efforts should not solely focus on individual actions or behaviors. It is crucial to identify and challenge the systemic barriers and biases that perpetuate inequality and exclusion. This may involve examining hiring practices, policies and organizational culture.
    • Lack of genuine leadership commitment: DEI initiatives require genuine commitment and support from leadership. Without strong leadership buy-in, these efforts can lack the necessary resources, accountability and sustainability to effect meaningful change.
    • Overlooking intersectionality: Intersectionality refers to the interconnected nature of social categorizations, such as race, gender, sexuality and class, which can create overlapping and interdependent systems of discrimination. Ignoring intersectionality can result in exclusionary practices and a limited understanding of the experiences of marginalized individuals.
    • Relying on quotas: While quotas can be a useful tool to increase representation, relying solely on them can be counterproductive. It is important to create inclusive environments where individuals from diverse backgrounds have equal opportunities to thrive, rather than solely focusing on numerical targets.
    • Lack of ongoing evaluation and feedback: DEI initiatives should be regularly evaluated and adjusted based on feedback from the affected communities. Failure to gather input and measure the impact of these initiatives can hinder progress and perpetuate ineffective practices.
    • Performative allyship: Performative allyship refers to instances where individuals or organizations publicly express support for marginalized groups without taking substantive actions to address underlying issues. It is important to back up intentions with meaningful actions and engagement.

    Equity is about meeting leaders where they’re at and equipping them proactively with tools and information to combat these missteps.

    Proactively communicating the importance that DEI is not a zero-sum game

    As with any shift in culture or change, the why is pivotal. People need to understand why equity is necessary. Equality is the goal – equity is how we get there. DEI is about doing things differently and challenging the status quo. We can’t solve a problem by doing things the same way that created the problem. That’s where equity comes in.

    Oftentimes, the majority group might feel alienated or that they’re somehow left out of promotional opportunities because of the focus on diversity. The opposite is often true. When we have diverse representation in decision-making, we have higher rates of innovation, higher revenue rates and profitability. Rather than thinking about it as my seat at the table versus your seat at the table, or my pie slice versus your pie slice, the pie collectively grows bigger and they’re more seats at the table for everyone.

    Many people get overwhelmed with diversity language. Just two letters in the difference between equality and equity mean two very different approaches. As leaders, it’s critical that we understand that equity is the path to equality and be willing to do things differently to achieve real diversity.

    [ad_2]

    Julie Kratz

    Source link

  • Why Japan is rethinking its rape laws and raising the age of consent from 13 | CNN

    Why Japan is rethinking its rape laws and raising the age of consent from 13 | CNN

    [ad_1]


    Tokyo, Japan
    CNN
     — 

    When Kaneko Miyuki reported her sexual assault as a seven-year-old in Japan, she remembers the police laughing at her. “I was already confused and scared,” she said. “They wouldn’t take me seriously as a child.”

    The following investigation made things worse. After being questioned, she was taken back to the scene of her assault without a guardian present, against all modern guidelines.

    The police never did bring her attacker to justice. The whole experience was so traumatizing for Kaneko that she repressed her memory of it until she began having flashbacks in her twenties, and didn’t come to terms with the fact she had been sexually assaulted until her 40s.

    Kaneko is among countless Japanese women who say their experiences of sexual assault and abuse were ignored because they “didn’t fit the criteria” of a victim. About 95% of survivors never report their assault to police, and nearly 60% never tell anyone at all, according to a 2020 government survey.

    But that could be about to change. On Friday, the Japanese parliament passed a raft of bills overhauling the country’s sex crime laws, long criticized as outdated and restrictive, reflecting conservative social attitudes that often stigmatize and cast doubt on victims.

    The new laws expand the definition of rape to place greater emphasis on the concept of consent; introduce national legislation against taking explicit photos with hidden cameras; and raise the age of consent to 16. The previous age of consent, at 13, had been among the lowest in the developed world.

    It marks a major victory for sexual assault survivors and activists, some of whom have spent decades lobbying for these changes.

    “We … would like to express our deepest gratitude to all the victims of sexual violence who have raised their voices together with us,” Spring, a survivor advocacy group, said on Friday.

    While cautioning there was still more work to be done, such as extending the statute of limitations and in recognizing power imbalances in cases involving authority figures, it said the bills were nonetheless a sign of progress.

    “Our earnest wish is that those who have been victims of sexual violence will find hope in their lives, and that sexual violence will disappear from Japanese society,” it said.

    One of the biggest reforms passed on Friday is to change the language used to define rape to include a greater emphasis on the concept of consent.

    Rape had previously been defined as “forcible sexual intercourse” committed “through assault or intimidation,” including by taking advantage of a victim’s “unconscious state or inability to resist.”

    The law had also previously required evidence of “intent to resist.”

    But activists had argued this is too hard to prove in many cases, such as when a victim experiences the common “freeze” response, or is too afraid to resist physically.

    Members of Spring, with Kaneko Miyuki in the center, during a news conference.

    Tadokoro Yuu, a representative of Spring, said the law had discouraged victims from coming forward due to “a fear of acquittal” if courts found insufficient evidence of resistance.

    The new law replaces “forcible sexual intercourse” with “non-consensual sexual intercourse,” and expands the definition of assault to include victims under the influence of alcohol or drugs, those with mental or physical disorders, and those intimidated through their attacker’s economic or social status. It also includes those unable to voice resistance due to shock or other “psychological reactions.”

    Other major changes include raising the age of consent to 16 years old except for when both parties are underage – on par with many US states and European nations including the United Kingdom, Finland and Norway.

    The amendments also expand protections for minors, establishing grooming as a crime for the first time. They further criminalize activity like asking those under 16 for sexual images, or asking to visit a minor for sexual purposes.

    It also makes it easier to prosecute people accused of taking or distributing photos of a sexual nature without the subject’s knowledge or consent – a hot button issue in Japan where upskirting and hidden cameras taking explicit photos of women has long been a problem.

    A survey last year found that nearly 9% of more than 38,000 respondents across Japan had experienced this kind of “voyeurism,” according to public broadcaster NHK. Victims described having photos taken up their skirt and shared on social media; others had photos secretly taken in changing rooms and bathrooms.

    They also described the long-term impact on their mental health, with many feeling unsafe in public spaces including trains and schools. Reporting the issue rarely helped: often, peers and even police officers would place the blame on their clothing, arguing that they had placed themselves at risk by wearing skirts, NHK reported.

    Until now, laws against voyeurism have been enforced only by local governments, and can vary across prefectures, complicating matters.

    In one notorious incident in 2012, a plane passenger took an upskirt photo of a flight attendant, was caught with several images on his phone, and admitted guilt – but was ultimately never charged, according to NHK. The problem? The crime had taken place midair on a moving plane – so it was impossible to know which prefecture they had been traveling over at the time, thus which location’s law should be applied.

    These amendments build on the work of an entire generation of activists who have tried with little success to push forth change, said Nakayama Junko, a lawyer and member of the non-profit Human Rights Now.

    “It’s been a long time … It’s not just a movement that has been going on for 50 years, it’s a voice that has been heard for decades,” she said.

    These previous attempts were blocked by governmental inertia and sometimes outright opposition from parliament members who believed the changes unnecessary, she said. Many people, including Japanese media, had a limited understanding of consent and believed “the crime of rape was being properly punished,” meaning little attention was paid to the issue.

    Things began to change in 2019 when the country was gripped by several high-profile rape acquittals, handed down within the span of a few weeks.

    In the most controversial case, a father was acquitted of raping his 19-year-old daughter in the central Japanese city of Nagoya. The court recognized that the sex was non-consensual, that the father had used force, and that he had physically and sexually abused his daughter – but judges argued she could have resisted, according to Reuters, which reviewed the verdict.

    Around 150 protesters demonstrate against several rape acquittals in Tokyo, Japan, on June 11, 2019.

    The father’s acquittal prompted nationwide protests, with women from Tokyo to Fukuoka taking to the streets for months and calling for legal change. Demonstrators held flowers as a sign of protest, and signs with slogans against sexual violence, including #MeToo.

    In the Nagoya case, the father’s acquittal was eventually overturned by Japan’s high court. But the spark had been lit, finally setting into motion the proposed reforms that have for years failed to take hold.

    The protests “conveyed (that) the reality of the damage was very significant,” Nakayama said, calling it a “main driving force that led to this amendment.”

    Both nonprofit organizations CNN interviewed praised the bills as an important step forward – but cautioned that much work remains to be done.

    Japan still lags far behind other developed nations in its ideas toward sex and consent, Nakayama said. Other countries have already begun amending their laws to reflect a “Yes means yes” mentality – meaning sexual partners should seek clear affirmative consent, rather than assuming consent unless told otherwise. Meanwhile, “in Japan, it seems that (the concept of) ‘No means no’ has just been communicated,” she said.

    Tadokoro, the Spring representative, echoed this point, saying it was important to recognize that consent isn’t inherently or permanently granted between couples, and can be withdrawn; that “it’s wrong to assume it’s a ‘yes’ even if they come over, or do not say no clearly.”

    There are other legal reforms they want to tackle in future amendments: better laws protecting people with disability from sexual abuse, and outlining the ways they can give consent, and extending the statute of limitations since many survivors go decades before coming to terms with what happened to them – as in Kaneko’s case.

    Others spend most of their life dealing with post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and other mental health consequences, before reaching a point where they have healed enough to consider pursuing justice.

    But perhaps the biggest obstacle is the Japanese public itself, and the harmful views on sexual abuse and victimhood that are still widespread.

    “When I talk to other people about (my assault), I get avoided, and am not accepted,” said Kaneko, recalling people who told her she would “forget with time” or that that’s just life.

    Sometimes their responses are far crueler. “I get ruthless reactions like, ‘You got done?’” she said.

    There are some positive signs of change, she said, pointing to public awareness campaigns by the government and increasing sexual education in schools. But there is still a gaping lack of systemic support for survivors like counseling, therapy, and public services to help them re-enter society.

    “Survivors of sexual assault like myself cannot even work, or go about your life – you become mentally ill, and you can’t take care of yourself,” she said.

    Authorities also need to introduce trauma-informed training for law enforcement and other workers dealing with survivors, said Tadokoro, adding that “some police investigators understand (how to approach the situation), while others do not understand at all.”

    For Kaneko, who went on to become the general secretary of Spring, the damage done at the police station when she was seven years old compounded the trauma from her assault – leaving scars that took decades to untangle.

    “I was implanted with a distrust of people when I experienced that kind of thing in an institution that is supposed to protect citizens, such as the adults and the police,” she said.

    “For many years, despite a lot of pain, I had no idea what (the source) was for many years … Having PTSD is not easy to heal on your own.”

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Southern Baptist Convention votes to uphold removal of Saddleback Church over women pastors after appeal by Rick Warren | CNN

    Southern Baptist Convention votes to uphold removal of Saddleback Church over women pastors after appeal by Rick Warren | CNN

    [ad_1]



    CNN
     — 

    The annual meeting of the Southern Baptist Convention voted to affirm a decision made earlier this year to remove Saddleback Church, a major southern California congregation founded by the pastor and author Rick Warren, due to its having women pastors.

    Representatives at the conference in New Orleans overwhelmingly supported the decision to expel the church, according to the vote count reported Wednesday morning, despite pleas a day earlier by Warren, the author of “The Purpose Driven Life.” The representatives, known as messengers, also voted to affirm the ousters of two other churches, including Fern Creek in Louisville, Kentucky, which has had a female pastor since 1993.

    The vote to uphold those removals came just a few hours before a two-thirds majority of the Southern Baptist Convention – the largest Protestant denomination in the United States – separately voted to approve an amendment to its constitution that would more broadly prohibit churches from having women hold any pastoral title.

    The amendment must pass by a two-thirds vote two years in a row, with Wednesday’s vote marking its first.

    The Baptist Press, which describes itself as the SBC’s official news service, reported Saddleback was found “not to be in friendly cooperation” with the SBC’s “statement of faith,” which says in part that “the office of pastor is limited to men.”

    Warren was among those who asked the SBC to reverse the February decision on Tuesday. He appealed to the representatives to “act like Southern Baptists who have historically ‘agreed to disagree’ on dozens of doctrines in order to share a common mission,” per the Times, which reported Warren appointed a husband and wife to succeed him after his retirement in 2021. Three more women were ordained as pastors at Saddleback that year, according to Baptist Press.

    Voters were unconvinced: Per the Baptist Press, 9,437 votes were cast in favor of upholding the decision, compared to 1,212 against. Fern Creek Baptist’s appeal was similarly rejected, with 9,700 voting in favor of upholding the decision and 806 voting against.

    CNN has reached out to the SBC, Saddleback Church and Fern Creek Baptist for comment.

    The ousting of a third church, Freedom Church in Vero Beach, Florida, was also upheld. That church was expelled for a separate reason unrelated to the question of female pastors.

    Churches not found in friendly cooperation effectively lose their affiliation with the wider convention, though they could still operate congregations.

    The fight at one of the nation’s most important evangelical bellwethers is playing out against the backdrop of broader political and cultural battles over the rights of women and LGBTQ people.

    In the wake of the Supreme Court’s reversal of Roe v. Wade, an energized, conservative faction within the GOP has pushed for strict abortion restrictions and limits on gender-affirming care for transgender people in statehouses across the country. That push has also triggered a backlash among the broader electorate, with Democrats notching victories in competitive 2022 midterm races and 2023 elections where those cultural clashes have taken center stage.

    Andy Wood, who currently pastors Saddleback Church, pushed back after the SBC’s decision to remove the church in a video in March, noting that all the church’s elders were men but that they could “empower women and mobilize women to use their spiritual gifts in the local church.”

    “This is a historic moment,” Wood said. “The church at large, the global church is looking for good Bible believing examples of empowering women for ministry. So Saddleback, we want to lead the way in that conversation.”

    “If we can be a part of mobilizing and empowering a whole generation of women, we would love nothing more than to lean into that conversation and empower women for ministry.”

    The proposed amendment taken up Wednesday would add a qualification to Article III of the SBC Constitution, saying churches will be considered in friendly cooperation only if they do “not affirm, appoint, or employ a woman as a pastor of any kind.”

    Mike Law, the pastor of Arlington Baptist Church in Arlington, Virginia, has identified himself as the person who introduced the amendment. In a video, he explained the goal was to “encourage Southern Baptists to keep in step with the spirit and the scriptures on the subject of the Pastoral office.

    “The Baptist faith and message announces our belief that the office of Pastor is limited to men as qualified by scripture, and this amendment would clarify that our cooperation as churches is in accord with this particular belief.”

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • This 1960s trailblazer of erotic pop art died just as she was finding fame | CNN

    This 1960s trailblazer of erotic pop art died just as she was finding fame | CNN

    [ad_1]

    Editor’s Note: Untold Art History investigates lesser-known stories in art, spotlighting pioneering artists who were overlooked during their lifetimes, as well as uncovering new insights into influential artworks that radically shift our understanding of them.



    CNN
     — 

    Throughout Evelyne Axell’s short but radical career, the Belgian artist revered the female body in psychedelic hues rendered in gleaming enamel. Nude women recline in acid green or cerulean blue fields under open skies; in one portrait, bodies and landscape become indistinguishable, with rings of colors forming the volume of a perm and tufts of grass the pubic hair.

    She delighted in double meanings. Axell’s most famous artwork, of a woman licking an ice cream cone, could be both a summery advertisement or an explicit pornographic scene. She named another painting, of red heels on a gas pedal, “Axell-ération” — an implied self-portrait, like many of her works.

    But the young actor-turned-Pop artist, who was working in the 1960s and early ’70s and had been trained by the famed surrealist artist René Magritte, had her career cut short. In 1972, only a handful of years into painting, she died in a car crash and faded into relative obscurity. Only in the past decade as curators have revisited the pop art movement beyond celebrated male artists — such as Andy Warhol, Roy Lichtenstein and Richard Hamilton — has Axell arisen as one of the many women co-opting mass media to engage with the social structures and politics of the ‘60s.

    “If you asked almost anybody to name a woman pop artist, you would probably get a blank stare,” said Catherine Morris, a curator at the Brooklyn Museum, which hosted the touring show “Seductive Subversion: Women Pop Artists, 1958–1968” in 2011. The landmark group show featured Axell and contemporaries including Pauline Boty and Chryssa.

    “(If this) period of emergence of women Pop artists had even been a couple of years later, we probably would have been more aware,” Morris continued, pointing to the 1970s as a turning point for women artists in the wake of second-wave feminism. “This whole group of women who covered this decade were dramatically overlooked.”

    Since “Seductive Subversion,” which first exhibited at The University of the Arts in Philadelphia, Axell’s work has been included in a host of significant group shows that take a more expansive, international view of pop art and foreground women. And in 2021, she achieved a significant posthumous milestone, with the Museum of Modern Art in New York adding “Axell-ération” to its collection. But institutional solo exhibitions remain few and far between, with retrospectives hosted by Museum Abteiberg in western Germany and the remote Swiss Alps art center Muzeum Susch 10 years apart. (Perhaps, in part, because of her limited output.)

    Now, two of Axell’s playful, erotic artworks— both painted with her signature application of enamel on plexiglass — are poised to make history at Christie’s, in her first major New York sale. “Paysage” a dreamy pastoral nude, is expected to surpass her record of $140,000, set in 2017, with a high estimate of $200,000; “L’Amazone”, a sensual blue-ombre hued portrait, could also come close at $120,000. But such sales for Axell are infrequent, according to Sara Friedlander, Christie’s deputy chairman of post-war and contemporary art.

    “She made very little work — she was 37-years-old when she died,” Friedlander said in a phone call. “So, in a way, the market doesn’t have enough to know what to do with her. These (paintings) are very special and very rare.”

    The decade following Axell’s death saw the emergence of a number of women artists who unabashedly expressed female sexuality, painting and photographing their own bodies, and subverting erotic or pornographic imagery. Artists such as Joan Semmel and Marilyn Minter believed that feminism should be inclusive of sexual agency, but as Morris explained, they faced criticism for doing so.

    Many of Axell's works are self-portraits, though she often obscured her identity by signing only with her last name.

    “The feminist artists who emerged in the 1970s and into the 1980s and 90s were very much taken to task by orthodox feminism in relationship to them utilizing their own sexuality, their own bodies, their own beauty,” she said.

    Axell might have been part of this crucial wave; curators and scholars are still unpacking her prescient feminist ideas, and the paradisical world she set them in. Instead, she hid her identity, signing her works with only her last name, after facing derision from male art critics, according to the exhibition at Muzeum Susch. Her stylistic approach — a mix of pop art influences and dreamy surrealist settings — is still underrecognized, according to Morris.

    “She acts as a historical bridge (between surrealism and pop art),” she said. “And I think that that’s something that’s dramatically unexplored.”

    Axell experimented with materials, applying enamel paint to plexiglas to heighten the dreamlike qualities of her work, as in this painting,

    Skilled at challenging expectations around her own beauty, sexuality and sense of self in her work, Axell was also politically engaged, producing portraits of the African American activist Angela Davis and a painting responding to the Kent State campus shootings in 1970.

    “Despite all aggressiveness, my universe abounds above all in an unconditional love for life,” Axell said in her only interview in 1970, according to a publication by Muzeum Susch. “My subject is clear: nudity and femininity experiment in the utopia of a bio-botanical freedom; that means a freedom without frustration nor gradual submission, and that tolerates only the limits that it sets itself.”

    One of Morris’ favorite works, shown at the Brooklyn Museum, embodies this spirit: an abstracted view of a woman’s torso, the curves of her body like peaks and valleys, her vulva covered in a real tuffet of green fur. Called “Petite fourrure verte” or “Small green fur,” the intimate perspective was based on a photograph Axell’s filmmaker husband, Jean Antoine, had taken of her.

    “It’s from 1970, just a couple years before her death,” Morris said. “So for me, it really epitomizes what would have been — what was to come.”

    Top image: “Axell-ération” from 1965.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Goldman Sachs Settles Gender Bias Lawsuit For $215 Million | Entrepreneur

    Goldman Sachs Settles Gender Bias Lawsuit For $215 Million | Entrepreneur

    [ad_1]

    In September 2010, three former Goldman Sachs employees filed a lawsuit against the bank, citing gender discrimination against female associates through salary, performance reviews, and promotions. Eight years later, it was granted class-action status, and a trial date was set for June 7, 2023 — nearly 13 years after filing the original complaint.

    Now, the plaintiffs’ longstanding fight is over.

    On Monday, a joint statement between the plaintiffs and the bank announced that Goldman Sachs settled the lawsuit for $215 million. In addition to the settlement, Goldman Sachs agreed to change some of its promotion practices and hire independent experts to conduct pay-equity studies and analysis on how the bank carries out performance reviews.

    “As one of the original plaintiffs, I have been proud to support this case without hesitation over the last nearly thirteen years and believe this settlement will help the women I had in mind when I filed the case,” said Shanna Orlich, in a statement.

    Since the original filing, the lawsuit grew to approximately 2,800 qualifying class members, and the settlement payout will be divided by a third-party administrator who will use an objective formula.

    Related: The Path to Progress: Achieving Gender Parity in the Workplace Starts With Our Mindset

    Qualifying class members are any women who held a position in a revenue-producing role in the bank’s investment banking, investment management, or securities divisions anytime between July 7, 2002, and March 28, 2023, or elsewhere in the U.S. at any time from September 10, 2004, through March 28, 2023.

    “Goldman Sachs is proud of its long record of promoting and advancing women and remains committed to ensuring a diverse and inclusive workplace for all our people,” said Goldman Sachs’ global head of human capital management, Jacqueline Arthur, in a statement. “After more than a decade of vigorous litigation, both parties have agreed to resolve this matter.”

    A hearing date for preliminary settlement approval has yet to be announced.

    Related: Google Pays $118 Million to Settle Gender Discrimination Lawsuit

    [ad_2]

    Madeline Garfinkle

    Source link