ReportWire

Tag: Eric Holder

  • Barack Obama is “Fired Up and Ready to Go” at Harris-Walz rally in Charlotte, North Carolina

    Barack Obama is “Fired Up and Ready to Go” at Harris-Walz rally in Charlotte, North Carolina

    [ad_1]

    Photo by Carla Peay/The Atlanta Voice

    CHARLOTTE – “Imagine it’s January 20, 2025. It is also Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Day. And a Black woman is holding the Frederick Douglass bible. Her name – Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson. And placing her hand on that bible is another black woman – Kamala Harris.”

    It was powerful imagery by Jamie Harrison, Chairman of the Democratic National Committee. Harrison was one of many speakers at the Charlotte Convention Center to introduce former President Barack Obama on Friday, October 25 in front of a crowd of several thousand supporters.

    “Kamala Harris will be sworn in, and she will vow to preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution of the United States,” Harris said. It was a sharp contrast to the words of Donald Trump, who called for the termination of the Constitution to overturn the results of the 2020 election.

    “What MAGA means is that the greatness of America is in our past. We believe it’s in our future,” Harrison said.

    Former Attorney General Eric Holder. Photo by Carla Peay/The Atlanta Voice

    Former Attorney General Eric Holder followed Harrison and talked about the danger of the Trump agenda – Project 2025.

    “Imagine Donald Trump back in power,” Holder said. “He would weaponize the Justice Department. He has installed a Supreme Court that thinks it’s OK for the president to violate federal law. He has a fascination with Hitler. This is the kind of America we would have under a second Trump presidency.”

    Holder spoke of the importance of voting, reminding the crowd of the sacrifices of our ancestors, who fought and died so we could have the right to vote.

    “Tim and Kamala are fighting the fights that matter,” Holder said. “We are not just going to save Democracy; we have the ability to enhance democracy.”  

    Following Holder was NC Attorney General and Democratic candidate for Governor Josh Stein, who still holds a double-digit lead in the polls over the Republican candidate, Mark Robinson.

    “We didn’t need the CNN story to know that Robinson is unfit for Governor,” Stein said. He reminded the crowd that Trump endorsed Robinson, despite Trump’s attempt to distance himself from Robinson since the CNN story aired in September.

    “The Republican vision is one of division, violence, and hate,” Stein said, drawing a parallel between his race and the presidential race.

    “The stakes could not be higher, and the choice could not be clearer,” Stein said.  

    When Barack Obama finally took the stage, the expected thunderous applause occurred. The former president then energized a crowd with a critique of Donald Trump that managed to be both funny and serious.

    “This man is a 78-year-old billionaire who has not stopped whining about his problems since he rode down that escalator,” Obama said. “He wants to sell you stuff, like gold sneakers and Trump bibles. His behavior has become so commonplace that people don’t take it seriously. But that doesn’t mean that a second Trump presidency would not be dangerous.”

    Obama talked about Trump’s “concepts of a plan” to replace the Affordable Care Act, his plans to use the military against “the enemy within”, and his fascination with Hitler.

    “When I was president, a lot of people disagreed with me,” Obama said. “It doesn’t mean you go after them, to try and use the military to do your bidding. This is a democracy.”

    He talked about how Trump is taking credit for the economy he (Obama) created; his plan to give tax cuts to billionaires, and if elected, how he will surround himself with people as wacky as he is.

    “People who know him best, people who served under him say how dangerous he is,” Obama said.  He also made a point to emphasize one of the most dangerous things Trump, and his running mate JD Vance, continue to do during their rallies – blame immigrants for everything.

    “We are a nation of immigrants, so unless you are Native American, everyone in this country came from somewhere else,” Obama said.

    “He thinks rounding up and deporting people is the answer to everything,” Obama said. “His plan is mean and ugly.” He acknowledged the border crisis is real but said Trump’s solution, and the way he plans to execute it, is not the way to solve the crisis. (During Obama’s tenure as president, he deported illegal immigrants, but never presented that action as the way to solve all the problems in the US, nor did he depict all immigrants – legal or otherwise – as criminals, murderers, or people from insane asylums, as Trump does.)

    He then launched into a spirited endorsement of Kamala Harris and her qualifications to be the next president. He talked about her accomplishments as a prosecutor, Attorney General, Senator, and Vice President, and said she was more than ready to become the next President.

    “Elections are not just about policies, they are about character, Obama said. “We need a leader who sees you and cares about you and thinks about you. Leaders don’t need to be perfect; they need to care.”

    Obama also stumped for Stein to become the next Governor and Mo Green to become the next Superintendent of Schools, taking a moment to remind the audience that Stein’s opponent referred to himself as a “Black Nazi”, and Green’s opponent, Michelle Morrow, said that Obama should face a firing squad. He talked about how Trump ignored the pandemic playbook he and his staff put together, and how Trump’s poor response to COVID caused the needless deaths of hundreds of thousands of Americans.

    “We need a President who cares about solving problems,” Obama said. “We have people with the kind of character we need to lead us. We don’t need four years of a would-be king. Kamala Harris has spent her life fighting for people. She knows and cares what people are going through. If you elect Kamala and Tim, they will be focused on you.”

    [ad_2]

    Carla Peay

    Source link

  • Obama Judge Holds Investigative Journalist Catherine Herridge In Contempt, Possible Fine Near $300,000

    Obama Judge Holds Investigative Journalist Catherine Herridge In Contempt, Possible Fine Near $300,000

    [ad_1]

    Opinion

    Screenshot: CBS New York

    Catherine Herridge, a veteran journalist formerly with Fox News and CBS News, has been held in civil contempt by a federal judge for refusing to reveal her source for a series of stories published in 2017.

    Herridge found herself in hot water regarding a court case in which she was protecting the identity of a source used for a report written that year regarding a Chinese American scientist who was investigated by the FBI but never charged with wrongdoing.

    The case has significant First Amendment implications.

    Herridge was facing fines of up to $5,000 per day if she refused to be interviewed under oath for the case, a situation critics have defined as an attack on free press principles.

    U.S. District Judge Christopher Cooper imposed a fine of $800 per day until Herridge complies, which could lead to a total of nearly $300,000 if she holds out over an entire year.

    The fine will not be imposed while she appeals.

    RELATED: CBS Seizes Materials Of Fired Journalist Who Was Investigating Hunter Biden

    Herridge Is Protecting Her Source

    The judge’s decision to hold Herridge in contempt for refusing to reveal her sources is a dangerous precedent that could have a chilling effect on investigative journalism.

    It sends a message to potential sources that they cannot trust journalists to protect their identities, which could result in fewer people coming forward with important information.

    Judge Cooper, in his decision, said that he “recognizes the paramount importance of a free press in our society” and the critical role of confidential sources in investigative journalism, but noted the court “also has its own role to play in upholding the law and safeguarding judicial authority.”

    Cooper was nominated for his role on the bench in 2013 by then-President Barack Obama. He was confirmed unanimously in the Senate the following year.

    RELATED: CBS News Chief Behind Firing Of Catherine Herridge In The Midst Of Investigating Biden Family To Receive Free Speech Award

    Chilling Effect

    Forcing journalists to reveal their sources undermines the public’s right to information and could have a chilling effect on investigative journalism. It is important for journalists to be able to protect their sources in order to ensure that the public is well-informed and that those in power are held accountable for their actions.

    “Herridge has long been a respected investigative journalist at Fox News and CBS News,” writes Legal Insurrection’s Mary Chastain. “She has always faced the wrath of the left when she exposed anything negative about Democrats.”

    Fox News issued a statement condemning the judge’s decision to hold Herridge in contempt.

    “Holding a journalist in contempt for protecting a confidential source has a deeply chilling effect on journalism,” they said.

    Even CBS News, who fired Catherine Herridge in the midst of this First Amendment battle and then temporarily seized her files, criticized the Obama-appointed judge.

    A spokesperson for the network said that the contempt order “should be concerning to all Americans who value the role of the free press in our democracy and understand that reliance on confidential sources is critical to the mission of journalism.”

    President Barack Obama himself has a history of chilling free speech and going after reporters.

    The former President used his Department of Justice (DOJ) to try and shut down Fox News reporter James Rosen by spying on him and accusing him of committing a crime.

    A 2010 subpoena approved by Eric Holder implicated Rosen as a possible co-conspirator under the Espionage Act of 1917. As such, investigators gained access to the times of his phone calls and two days’ worth of Rosen’s emails.

    The DOJ also mounted a serious attack on the First Amendment and Freedom of the Press by seizing the records of reporters at Fox News and the Associated Press (AP).

    The AP reporters – 20 of them – had their phone records subpoenaed through their providers, something they claimed at the time was a “massive and unprecedented intrusion” into news-gathering operations.

    Imagine this were a Trump-appointed judge in this case and instead of Herridge, the reporter trying to protect their sources was Jim Acosta or Don Lemon. Would there be outrage at that point?

    Follow Rusty on X

    Popular Conservative ‘Catturd’ Predicts Mitch McConnell Will Try To Take Down Trump

    Now is the time to support and share the sources you trust.
    The Political Insider ranks #3 on Feedspot’s “100 Best Political Blogs and Websites.”

    Rusty Weiss has been covering politics for over 15 years. His writings have appeared in the Daily Caller, Fox… More about Rusty Weiss

    [ad_2]

    Rusty Weiss

    Source link

  • Eric Holder Says It Would Be ‘Absurd’ For Trump To Serve As President If Convicted

    Eric Holder Says It Would Be ‘Absurd’ For Trump To Serve As President If Convicted

    [ad_1]

    Eric Holder, who served as attorney general under President Barack Obama, on Sunday said it would be “simply absurd” for Donald Trump to serve as president again if he is found guilty of mishandling classified documents.

    The former president, who is currently the front-runner for the 2024 Republican nomination, was indicted on 37 counts over keeping top secret documents after he left the White House in January 2021 and allegedly obstructing government efforts to recover them.

    Despite the damning charges, which include willful retention of national defense information and conspiracy to obstruct justice, Trump has continued to claim he’s innocent and appears determined to stay in the 2024 presidential contest.

    “The notion that you could have a trial, defend it, be convicted, somehow win the election, be sworn in as a president, or whenever it happens, that seems inconsistent with our notion of fairness, of the rule of law,” Holder said on MSNBC’s “Inside with Jen Psaki.”

    Holder added that he would hope that an impeachment proceeding would be triggered if Trump were to be found guilty while in office, and that he would ultimately be removed from the role.

    “The notion that a convicted felon … would serve as president of the United States is absurd, is simply absurd,” Holder said.

    But Trump has said he has no intention of stepping aside.

    “I’ll never leave,” Trump told Politico Saturday. “Look, if I would have left, I would have left prior to the original race in 2016. That was a rough one. In theory that was not doable.”

    Holder also expressed concern about Aileen Cannon, the judge who will preside over the case, saying she doesn’t have the “legal acumen” to oversee a case of this importance.

    Cannon, who was appointed by Trump in 2020, was criticized over her decision to grant the former president’s request for a special master to review the documents the FBI obtained during a search of Mar-a-Lago in August. Her ruling was overturned by a federal appeals court.

    “I would hope that she would see within herself, or that somehow, some way, she is convinced that she should get off the case and some other judge should handle this matter,” Holder said. “I don’t have confidence in her abilities to be fair, or to be seen as fair.”

    He added that Cannon as a presiding judge would have the power to affect the case in a number of ways.

    “But the one that concerns me the most is the notion of delay, and pushing this case, you know, past the general election, certainly well into the primary season, just by the way in which she schedules things,” Holder added.

    [ad_2]

    Source link