ReportWire

Tag: true story

  • Fact check: ‘Roofman’ is based on a true NC story. But how much truth is in it?

    [ad_1]

    Channing Tatum stars in Paramount Pictures' "Roofman," which is based on an N.C. crime story (and filmed in the Charlotte area last year).

    Channing Tatum stars in Paramount Pictures’ “Roofman,” which is based on an N.C. crime story (and filmed in the Charlotte area last year).

    TNS

    Of all the questions moviegoers can come up with regarding the authenticity of the new “Roofman” movie, this one might stand as the biggest: At the time of his crimes, was Jeffrey Manchester even remotely close to as good-looking as Channing Tatum?

    That, of course, is subjective. Meanwhile, many of the other “what’s true and what’s not” questions we expect to be raised by the film — based on Manchester’s brazen McDonald’s robberies, his bold escape from a North Carolina prison, and the bonkers series of adventures that saw him living in (and next to) a Charlotte Toys R Us while wooing a churchgoing single mom under false pretenses — can be answered much more objectively.

    “Roofman” opened in theaters nationwide on Friday; so if you haven’t yet seen it but plan to, you may want to bookmark this page and come back to it after.

    Because, obviously, spoilers abound.

    If you have seen it, then let’s dive right in to our great, big fact check, which outlines numerous examples of the creative license the filmmakers took on their way to adapting Manchester’s life and crimes for the big screen.

    Kirsten Dunst (who portrays Leigh Wainscott) and Channing Tatum (Jeffrey Manchester) on the set of "Roofman.”
    Kirsten Dunst (who portrays Leigh Wainscott) and Channing Tatum (Jeffrey Manchester) on the set of “Roofman.” Davi Russo Davi Russo

    In the movie: As the story begins, Jeffrey (played by Tatum) is in a tenuous off-again-on-again relationship with the mother of his three children, including very young twins and a daughter who turns 6 and then 7 in the first 15 minutes of running time. It’s implied that they reside in North Carolina (and, though it’s never made explicit, it’s suggested they’re in the Fayetteville area).

    In real life: Somewhat true, somewhat false. Manchester was never a permanent North Carolina resident. He had lived near California’s Bay area for years. He was divorced in 1999, and during that period became estranged from his three children. In May 2000, he arrived in the Tar Heel state on an assignment as an Army Reserve sergeant; shortly thereafter, he wound up in the Charlotte area — where he would rob two McDonald’s over the course of just a few hours. At the time, his daughter was about 7, but his twin sons were actually a year older than her.

    In the movie: Having broken into a Fayetteville McDonald’s through its roof, Jeffrey genially forces employees into the restaurant’s freezer — and in doing so, he makes sure they put on the coats they had worn to work (implying that it is wintertime).

    In real life: More true than not, though there’s no record of him ever committing a robbery anywhere near Fayetteville. Also, this is somewhat nitpicky, but … he actually was known for putting employees into the restaurant’s walk-in refrigerator. And FWIW, Mirvat Fayad says that when he robbed the McDonald’s she worked at in Belmont on the morning of May 20, 2000 (low temp that day: 65 degrees), he put them in the fridge after having the manager fetch for each of them a McDonald’s-uniform jacket. Those coats, she told us, were provided for employees who need to do work inside the refrigerators or freezers.

    This newly renovated McDonald’s, on Main Street in Belmont, stands in place of the old building that was originally broken into and robbed by Jeffrey Manchester in May 2000.
    This newly renovated McDonald’s, on Main Street in Belmont, stands in place of the old building that was originally broken into and robbed by Jeffrey Manchester in May 2000. Melissa Melvin-Rodriguez mrodriguez@charlotteobserver.com

    In the movie: As Jeffrey presents a new bike to his daughter at her seventh birthday party, police arrive to arrest him for his “Roofman” crimes.

    In real life: False. He was arrested as he fled with cash he’d taken from the Belmont McDonald’s, after Fayad and her co-workers were able to break open the refrigerator’s door and call police.

    In the movie: Jeffrey — who claims that he robbed 45 McDonald’s restaurants before being caught — is convicted of three counts of felony kidnapping. At a hearing on Feb. 4, 2004, a judge tells him, “Although you’re only being tried for one robbery, we know you’ve done many more,” then sentences him to 45 years in prison. (Jumping ahead a little here, but the movie suggests the whole Manchester saga played out over the course of two years. It actually spanned more than twice as long as that.)

    In real life: True-ish, and false-ish. A jury convicted him of seven counts of kidnapping and one weapons offense, all related to the two N.C. robberies. He was sentenced to 32 to 45 years by a Gaston County judge — on Nov. 2, 2000. Authorities had been investigating him for at least 42 armed robberies in other states, but eventually retired those efforts.

    In the movie: Jeffrey escapes from a Polkton prison by wedging a piece of plywood into the undercarriage of a large box truck, and then climbing up onto the plywood, where he could avoid being spotted by guards using under-vehicle search mirrors.

    In real life: True. The film’s and history’s timelines realign here, too, with the escape taking place in June 2004. (What’s false about how that scene plays out, however, is that it has Manchester managing to get a fair distance away from the prison while riding under the truck; in actuality, he only got as far as an outbuilding, then had to slip away from there.)

    In the movie: Jeffrey winds up in the Charlotte area and randomly decides that a Toys R Us store (shown late in the movie as being located in Pineville) would be a good place to hide out. He finds a difficult-to-access, walled-off area of the store — behind a display of kids’ bikes — where he creates a lair that includes a children’s mattress fitted with Spider-Man bedsheets and comforters. He manages to take control of the security cameras, sets up stolen baby monitors to spy on employees, uses the store as a playground at night, and eats stolen candy and baby food. The lair goes undetected for six months.

    Channing Tatum as Jeffrey Manchester in “Roofman,” much of which is set in the busy Toys R Us store he’s hiding in.
    Channing Tatum as Jeffrey Manchester in “Roofman,” much of which is set in the busy Toys R Us store he’s hiding in. Davi Russo Davi Russo

    In real life: More true than not. The false parts include the fact that the store was actually on Independence Boulevard in Charlotte; as well as the fact that while he did live behind a wall in the Toys R Us for multiple months, that hideout was discovered by employees (when he happened to not be there). Around that time, he bored a hole through a wall on the opposite side of Toys R Us, into a closed-down Circuit City electronics store, where he created another lair behind a wall underneath a staircase.

    In the movie: Leigh Wainscott (played by Kirsten Dunst) is introduced as an employee at Toys R Us and a recently divorced single mom of two girls — Dee, 11, and Lindsay, 16.

    In real life: Vaguely true, but largely false. Wainscott (now Leigh Moore) worked in the corporate office of a large automotive group at the time. She was separated, but not yet divorced; and she actually has three children, including daughter Ashley (who was about 15 at the time), son Matt (about 12 then), and daughter Ginny (about 9).

    In the movie: Jeffrey hacks into the store manager’s computer and changes Leigh’s work schedule.

    In real life: Again, Wainscott never worked at Toys R Us. However, it’s true that Manchester was able to get into the store’s scheduling system and made changes based on who he might want working (or not working) at particular times — and perhaps just to generally create chaos.

    In the movie: While spying on a conversation between Leigh and Toys R Us manager Mitch (played by Peter Dinklage), Jeffrey learns of a toy drive happening at Wainscott’s church — Crossroads, located “just across the interstate.” He starts attending the church after dropping by with a garbage bag full of stolen toys.

    Channing Tatum’s Jeffrey Manchester uses the Toys R Us as a playground in “Roofman.”
    Channing Tatum’s Jeffrey Manchester uses the Toys R Us as a playground in “Roofman.” Davi Russo Davi Russo

    In real life: Somewhat true, somewhat false. In mid-fall of 2004, Manchester did in fact wander over to Crossroads Church — about 300 yards from the Toys R Us, over on Monroe Road — but mainly because he was bored and lonely after more than four months of little to no human contact. He didn’t meet Wainscott until after he started attending services. Oh, and he did bring an impressive amount of (stolen) toys to support a church toy drive, but not till closer to Christmastime.

    In the movie: Jeffrey introduces himself to Leigh as John Zorn, a “just officially divorced” dad of “two little monster boys and … a little girl that is my best pal.” He says he works for the government, but “can’t really talk about it. It’s classified.”

    In real life: Mostly true. The only exception? Leigh Moore told us recently that Manchester never mentioned having kids or being married while they were dating.

    In the movie: “John” and Leigh attend a singles brunch at Red Lobster, after which she asks him out.

    In real life: All true, except the event was actually at TGI Friday’s.

    In the movie: Leigh tells “John” her ex’s name was Jeffrey, making for a strange coincidence.

    In real life: True!

    Jeffrey Manchester, photographed during his trial in November of 2000, one day before he was sentenced to serve at least 35 years in prison.
    Jeffrey Manchester, photographed during his trial in November of 2000, one day before he was sentenced to serve at least 35 years in prison. John D. Simmons Charlotte Observer File Photo

    In the movie: His excessively sugary diet causes Jeffrey to have to visit a nearby dentist to have 14 cavities filled.

    In real life: True. We don’t know exactly how many cavities he had, but he did indeed get some filled at a dentist’s office.

    In the movie: Speaking of candy, there’s a scene on Halloween when “John” and Leigh’s younger daughter Dee are shown trick-or-treating together, with him dressed as a pink bunny.

    In real life: False. Manchester hadn’t even met Wainscott by Halloween of 2004. He did steal a pink bunny costume from a staff area of Toys R Us (it was used around Easter), but he wore it — for kicks — to a Christmas party hosted by a member of Crossroads Church in December.

    In the movie: After a simmering rift between Leigh and her teenage daughter leads to an argument over Lindsay’s refusal to learn how to drive her mom’s stick shift, “John” announces they need a “beater” — i.e. a used automatic-transmission car that will make it easier for her to get her license. “John,” Leigh and the two girls pick out a green Chrysler Concorde sedan at a local dealership and take it for a memorably zany test drive. He winds up buying it, with a roll of cash.

    In real life: Kinda, sorta true. Ish. Wainscott grew to thinking he really needed a car, so they went to a local dealership and he stunned her by plunking down $5,000 cash for a green 1999 Chrysler Concorde. None of her children went with them. The test drive was uneventful.

    Channing Tatum and Kirsten Dunst chat next to the green Chrysler Concorde in “Roofman.”
    Channing Tatum and Kirsten Dunst chat next to the green Chrysler Concorde in “Roofman.” Davi Russo Davi Russo

    In the movie: Jeffrey is seen making three visits to a pawn shop. Twice, he goes when it’s open, to sell video games he stole from the toy store (at one point it’s mentioned that he stole $10,000 worth of games in total). Closer to the end, he breaks in at night and steals a pistol from a glass case along with a “POLICE” vest on a clothing rack.

    In real life: Almost entirely true. Manchester did steal a significant amount of video games from the store, and pawned them. Former Charlotte police sergeant Katherine Scheimreif told us he also stole two pistols from a pawn shop farther down Independence.

    In the movie: On Christmas Eve, Jeffrey robs the Toys R Us he’s been living in as it gets ready to open for the day. In the process, he knocks out and bloodies an armed security guard by striking him with his rifle.

    In real life: Fairly accurate. In the course of a day-after-Christmas robbery, Manchester — wearing a vest that had “POLICE” on it — got the jump on an off-duty Mecklenburg County sheriff’s deputy who’d been hired to protect the store that morning. He took her service pistol, pointed it at her, and ordered her to the floor. He did not physically harm her, but Scheimreif told us the woman was new to her job and decided to leave the profession after being victimized.

    Jeffery Manchester’s Jan. 5, 2005 mug shot. 
    Jeffery Manchester’s Jan. 5, 2005 mug shot.  File Photo

    In the movie: Jeffrey gets the big score he came for, but is thrown off his game when Leigh appears unexpectedly at the entrance. Rattled, he runs with the stolen cash to the rear of the store and flees via the emergency exit.

    In real life: Fairly inaccurate. Manchester’s robbery went awry when two employees escaped while he was pulling money from the safe. He did run to the back of the store, but his plan had been to trigger the emergency-exit alarm — to make everyone think he’d left the building — and then slip through the passageway to reach his Circuit City hideout. Unfortunately for him, he forgot to trigger that alarm. Responding officers found the passageway, then found the hideout. He wasn’t in it, but they found a fingerprint that matched the escaped convict Jeffrey Manchester. Leigh didn’t find out about any of this until a week and a half later (more on that in a moment).

    In the movie: Jeffrey tries to cover his tracks by burning down the dentist’s office where he had his cavities filled.

    In real life: True.

    In the movie: It’s implied that Leigh went to the police and then agreed to use herself as bait. As Jeffrey is on his way to the airport, to catch a flight that will take him to a country with no extradition, she calls and asks if he’s coming to Christmas dinner. He turns around and heads back to her apartment, where police are waiting to arrest him.

    Channing Tatum and Kirsten Dunst in a scene from “Roofman.”
    Channing Tatum and Kirsten Dunst in a scene from “Roofman.” Courtesy of Paramount Pictures

    In real life: Mostly false, but with grains of truth. Charlotte police were showing Manchester’s photo to residents and businesses all around the Toys R Us, and finally got a hit at Crossroads Church, where members recognized him as John Zorn. They said he’d been dating Wainscott, and on Jan. 6 — her 40th birthday — police made a surprise visit to her workplace to tell her that her boyfriend was on “America’s Most Wanted.” The couple already had plans for dinner, and although Manchester knew police were onto him, Wainscott successfully got him to stick to the plan by acting calm and cool on a phone call confirming their date. He was arrested without incident outside of her apartment when he arrived to pick her up. He apparently did have plans to leave the country after taking her to dinner.

    In the movie: Jeffrey is sentenced to “384 more months,” which is 32 years. “That means by the time I get out of here,” he says in voiceover, “I’ll be an old man.”

    In real life: Basically false. Manchester is in Central Prison in Raleigh serving out the rest of his original 35-year sentence (for his Gaston County crimes). He did get more than 25 years for the Toys R Us crimes and the arson conviction, but the Mecklenburg judge who sentenced him in that case ordered that time be served concurrently — so he’s still expected to be released in 2036. By then, he’ll be 65 years old.

    In the movie: A fellow convict asks Jeffrey if he ever got to see Leigh again. Then the film cuts to a scene in which Leigh visits Jeffrey in prison shortly after he’s recaptured. She tells him, tearfully, “I was really angry at you. I was most angry at how you hurt the girls. But that’s not the way I think about it now. I think about it as an adventure. I had a lot of fun. I’m thankful.”

    In real-life: True-ish. Wainscott did make one visit to the prison afterward. She said it was just “for closure.” She then went almost two decades without talking to him, and has been happily remarried since 2016. But she reconnected with Manchester after the movie went into production — both were involved as consultants. In an interview with The Charlotte Observer last month, she said, “Yes, he broke the law. Yeah, he was a criminal. But he’s a good person.”

    Leigh Moore, photographed this past summer at her home in Matthews.
    Leigh Moore, photographed this past summer at her home in Matthews. Melissa Melvin-Rodriguez mrodriguez@charlotteobserver.com

    This story was originally published October 10, 2025 at 4:28 PM.

    Théoden Janes

    The Charlotte Observer

    Théoden Janes has spent more than 18 years covering entertainment and pop culture for the Observer. He also thrives on telling emotive long-form stories about extraordinary Charlotteans and — as a veteran of three dozen marathons and two Ironman triathlons — occasionally writes about endurance and other sports.
    Support my work with a digital subscription

    [ad_2]

    Theoden Janes

    Source link

  • Unbelievable facts

    Unbelievable facts

    [ad_1]

    A man searching for his biological father discovered that his best friend from grade school was…

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Read Full Story>>

    Read Full Story>>

    [ad_1]

    Read Full Story>>

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Gov. Gavin Newsom goes viral for ‘shoplifting’ at Target

    Gov. Gavin Newsom goes viral for ‘shoplifting’ at Target

    [ad_1]

    Gov. Gavin Newsom has gone viral for shoplifting at Target. Well, sort of.

    The governor didn’t actually steal anything. But as he tells it, he did witness someone blatantly walking out of a Sacramento-area store with an armload of stolen stuff, presumably right in front of his own intimidating-looking security detail. And when Newsom asked why no one was taking action, the clerk told him it was the governor’s fault.

    Newsom has made it too easy to steal, he said the clerk told him — before realizing who he was and freaking out.

    Newsom, who was Christmas shopping with one of his children at the time, said he was outraged. It’s just not true, he said he told the clerk. California has the tenth-toughest laws against retail theft in the nation, he lectured — in a way that must have seemed super weird until she deduced his identity.

    “I said: ‘Why didn’t you stop him?’ ” Newsom said he asked the clerk.

    “She goes, ’Oh, the governor’ ” — he broke off — “swear to God, true story, on my mom’s grave.” He added that the clerk had the temerity to tell him: “The governor lowered the threshold, there’s no accountability. … We don’t stop them because of the governor.”

    Newsom told the story this week to a group of mayors from around the state who had gathered on Zoom for a news conference on his mental health initiative, Proposition 1. He and the mayors were chatting among themselves while waiting for San Francisco’s London Breed and San Diego’s Todd Gloria to log on. After relating the anecdote, the governor added that he hoped the two mayors weren’t the only ones not yet signed into the Zoom. “Hopefully, all the reporters weren’t on,” he said.

    Too late. The exchange, posted on X (formerly known as Twitter) and then picked up by television and print outlets around the state, quickly went viral — catnip in the heated debate about retail theft and Proposition 47, which reduced some thefts and drug offenses to misdemeanors to reduce mass incarceration. Some critics have blamed Proposition 47 for the rise in thefts.

    Newsom himself came out last month calling for legislation to crack down on “professional thieves” without amending Proposition 47, noting that one of the wine stores he owns in San Francisco was robbed at least three times in 2021. He pointed out that Texas’ threshold for felony theft is among those that is higher than California’s.

    But those points did little to calm the viral story. The chairwoman of the state Republican Party, Jessica Millan Patterson, quickly jumped into the fray, writing on X: “Shout-out to this store clerk for saying to the governor’s face what every Californian has wanted to say: that he and his radical @CA_Dem buddies are to blame for CA’s surging crime. Sadly, Newsom still didn’t seem to take the hint.”

    Newsom’s office declined to identify which Target the encounter occurred at, to keep the media from mobbing the store. They did say the encounter took place in the Sacramento area, around Christmastime, while the governor was shopping with one of his children.

    The exchange, the governor said, ended with an attempt at a photo-op.

    As the governor was explaining how strict California’s retail theft laws actually are, the clerk, he said, “looks at me, twice. She freaks out. She calls everyone over, wants to take photos.”

    “I said, no, I’m not taking a photo,” Newsom said. “We’re having a conversation. Where’s your manager? How are you blaming the governor?”

    He added: “Why am I spending $380? Everyone can walk the hell right out.”



    [ad_2]

    Jessica Garrison

    Source link

  • Is True Detective Season 4 Based on a True Story? Real Events, Facts & People

    Is True Detective Season 4 Based on a True Story? Real Events, Facts & People

    [ad_1]

    True Detective Season 4 (also known as True Detective: Night Country) is an anthology crime drama series that has gained acclaim for its atmospheric storytelling, complex characters, and exploration of dark philosophical themes. Each season features a new cast, and Season 4 follows Liz Danvers, who investigates a case of sudden disappearance. So, is there a possibility that True Detective: Night Country is based on a true story, and are there any real events and facts that we can expect to see this season?

    Is True Detective Season 4 based on a true story?

    No, True Detective Season 4 is not completely based on a true story. However, reports suggest that there have been two real-life mysteries that served as an inspiration for the show. That said, it is important to note that only the primary setting of these incidents was picked up by the filmmakers, and everything else that unfolds is fictional.

    True Detective Season 4’s real events and facts explained

    Their first inspiration is the Mary Celeste ship incident that occurred in 1872 when a whole crew disappeared out of the blue and an abandoned ship was found floating near the Azores Islands. The second one involves a group of Russian explorers who were hiking in the Ural Mountains in 1950. They were found dead outside their camps, and somehow, it seemed like they had cut their way out of their tents. An avalanche was blamed for their demise, but most were still sceptical of the actual reason.

    The real people behind True Detective Season 4’s characters

    The characters in True Detective Season 4 are fictional, and inspired by most archetypes. However, it does bring back the cynical and nihilistic touch of Season 1, which was a trait of Rust Cohle, a beloved fictional detective. The show has two strong female leads, and they are extremely well-written.

    Is Liz Danvers a real person?

    Liz Danvers is a created character, and according to Jodie Foster, who plays her, she is an “Alaskan Karen.” She struggles with her personal life and is protective of the people she loves, but she also seems to be pessimistic due to her inner turmoil.

    Netflix has dropped a brand new trailer for its upcoming animated fantasy movie, Orion and the Dark. The trailer features…

    Disney has revealed the Wish digital, 4K, Blu-ray, and DVD release dates for the newest Walt Disney Animation Studios film.…

    Stranger Things star Eduardo Franco, who played Argyle in Season 4, has said that he won’t be returning for the…

    To celebrate the 85th anniversary of The Wizard of Oz, Warner Bros. has partnered up with Fathom Events for upcoming…

    [ad_2]

    Sonika Kamble

    Source link

  • It’s Important To Remember That ‘Society of the Snow’ Isn’t Just a Movie

    It’s Important To Remember That ‘Society of the Snow’ Isn’t Just a Movie

    [ad_1]

    After a short theatrical run, Society of the Snow is now streaming on Netflix. As viewers delve into one of the streamer’s most harrowing movies, they will likely want to learn more about the horrific true story that inspired the film.

    Society of the Snow is a survival film directed by J. A. Bayona (The Impossible, Jurassic World: Fallen Kingdom). It’s no surprise that the film has been topping Netflix’s charts, considering it has already made the shortlist for Best International Feature Film at the 96th Academy Awards. The movie takes place in 1972 and follows the agonizing journey of a band of plane crash survivors. After miraculously surviving a Uruguayan plane crash, a few survivors find themselves stranded in the Andes, where they face starvation, exposure, and avalanches. Despite the obstacles they face, they are determined to defy all the odds and make it out of the Andes alive.

    Society of the Snow is equal parts harrowing and inspirational. It is definitely not for the faint of heart, as what these survivors go through is quite unimaginable. At the same time, it’s hard not to be inspired by such an intense display of human resilience and endurance. While fretting over the plight of these survivors, you’ll also feel awe at the power of the human desire to live. However, you’ll likely be wondering if such an extraordinary tale could really be true.

    The true story behind Society of the Snow

    Men stand in the snow beside a wrecked airplane in
    (Netflix)

    Society of the Snow is, indeed, based on a true story. It dramatizes the story of Uruguayan Air Force Flight 571. As the film depicts, this flight set off on its ill-fated journey on October 12, 1972. It held 45 passengers and crew members, including 19 members of a Uruguayan rugby sports club and their families. They were flying from Montevideo, Uruguay, to Santiago, Chile, for a match. However, bad weather and a co-pilot’s mistake led to things going terribly wrong.

    Co-pilot Lieutenant-Colonel Dante Héctor Lagurara mistakenly believed they had reached Curicó, Chile, even though his instruments should have told him otherwise. He started to land prematurely, and before the plane could correct its course, it struck a mountain and crashed in the heart of the Andes. The crash was so severe that 12 passengers died immediately upon impact, with others passing shortly afterward due to injury and freezing temperatures. Meanwhile, the remaining survivors were in bad shape. One of them, Nanda Parrado, recounted that he fell into a coma for three days after the crash before waking.

    The survivors shared a small supply of food salvaged from the crash and found a way to melt snow into drinking water. At first, it seemed all they had to do was hunker down until rescuers found them. However, rescuers weren’t coming for them. Due to the white airplane wreckage blending into the snow, authorities couldn’t locate the crash site. After eight days of searching, the rescue was called off, with the assumption that no one could’ve survived the crash plus multiple days in such harsh conditions. The original survivors actually heard their rescue mission being called off from a radio that survived the crash. Instead of sinking into despair, the survivors decided that they were going to get themselves out of the Andes.

    How did the Flight 571 passengers survive?

    As the days increased, they were forced to take desperate measures, including resorting to cannibalism. This story detail was the subject of much scrutiny and the survivors have since opened up about dealing with the media’s horror and questions regarding this desperate act of survival. However, they had no other choice. They resorted to this in the most humane way possible, only agreeing on it after long discussions. They even made pacts that, if they died, they would offer their bodies as food to the remaining survivors. Still, conditions worsened, with avalanches and hunger leaving just 19 survivors. Finally, the survivors decided they needed to take action. Parrado and fellow survivor Roberto Canessa decided to hike across the mountains in search of civilization.

    Against all odds, Parrado and Canessa survived a ten-day hike in extreme conditions with no mountaineering gear while suffering from starvation and altitude sickness. They hiked all the way to Chile and, on December 20, made contact with a farmer. It wasn’t long before police, reporters, and rescue helicopters arrived on the scene. After hearing Parrado’s story, rescuers boarded a plane with him and found and rescued the remaining survivors. In total, 16 young men ultimately survived the ordeal and were rescued 72 days after the crash.

    As harrowing as Society of the Snow is, it has been praised for humanizing the survivors. Director Bayona revealed that he never wanted the film to focus on the “horror” of the story but to encourage viewers to see the survivors’ dignity, generosity, and sacrifice. Even after watching the movie and reading various recaps of Flight 571, most of us will still be unable to comprehend how 16 people survived 72 days in the Andes or how two survivors hiked to Chile in 10 days with no gear or experience. Though most of us can’t imagine or understand many of the aspects of this extreme survival story, we can still respect the survivors and those who lost their lives by remembering that this is, above all, a true story that must be treated sensitively.

    (featured image: Netflix)

    Have a tip we should know? [email protected]

    [ad_2]

    Rachel Ulatowski

    Source link

  • Is Heaven is For Real Based on a True Story? Real Events, Facts & People

    Is Heaven is For Real Based on a True Story? Real Events, Facts & People

    [ad_1]

    Heaven is For Real is a compelling film that chronicles the experiences of Colton Burpo, a young boy who claims to have seen heaven after a near-death encounter. After a life-threatening surgery, he shares vivid details about his journey to beyond. So, is this extraordinary account shown in Heaven is For Real based on a true story, and does it cover any real events and facts?

    Is Heaven is For Real based on a true story?

    Yes, Heaven is For Real is based on a true story. The movie is adapted from Todd Burpo and Lynn Vincent’s eponymous novel which recounts the experiences of the Burpo family. The story unfolds as a firsthand account of Colton’s father, Todd, who’s a pastor, and he tries to reconcile with his faith after listening to his son’s unexpected claims. After the surgery, Colton made some bold yet accurate claims that surprised his parents, which convinced them that his story was worth telling.

    Heaven is For Real’s real events and facts explained

    As reports suggest, Colton Burpo had to remain hospitalized for a longer period than what is shown in the movie. Also, he never actually flatlined, and his heart was beating just fine during the surgery. Four months after the surgery, Todd was able to tell what his parents were doing when he was in the operation theatre. He accurately described his father yelling at God, and his mom being in another room. Colton was claimed to have seen his great-grandfather on Todd’s maternal side. The child had no contact with him before and was able to recognize him from a picture of his younger days. According to Colton, he also met his younger sister, who was miscarried long before his birth. This also came as a surprise to his parents because they never told him about the miscarriage. Colton also saw Jesus in heaven and the closest representation of the visuals in Akaine Kramarik’s painting.

    The real people behind Heaven is For Real’s characters

    The movie mostly features characters based on real-life individuals, and the Burpo family takes center stage with their extraordinary experiences that resulted in a bestselling book. The characters in the movie closely mirror their real-life counterparts, and the filmmakers try to capture the emotional and spiritual journey of the Burpo family. However, the cinematic adaptation uses its artistic license to some degree and fictionalizes certain elements for dramatic effect.

    Is Todd Burpo a real person?

    Yes, Todd Burpo is a real-life pastor and the young protagonist’s father. Purportedly, he was also subjected to another miracle when he first had signs of hyperplasia, which led to breast cancer, but later, these signs vanished after other tests were done. Some people doubt that Colton was influenced due to his father being a pastor, and his story would have been different if he hadn’t been born into a family of Christian faith.

    Is Colton Burpo a real person?

    Colton Burpo is also a real person. He’s the son of Todd and Sonja Burpo who claimed to have a near-death experience during a medical emergency. He was interviewed again at the age of 14, and he claims to vividly remember what he saw up in heaven, a memory he formed when he was only around four. According to Colton, he saw his great-grandfather, his sister, Jesus, the gates of heaven, and even Armageddon.

    The second cinematic adaptation of Alice Walker’s 1982 novel is arriving in theaters. The first time we saw Celie, Shug,…

    Charlie Hunham may have revealed that a Triple Frontier sequel is in the works, with the actor confirming he’s signed…

    The master tapes for the fan-favorite Canadian animated series ReBoot have been found, according to a recent group of fans.…

    Sony Pictures has dropped a new Anyone But You video for the upcoming romantic comedy, which will arrive in theaters…

    [ad_2]

    Sonika Kamble

    Source link

  • Is BlacKkKlansman Based on a True Story? Real Events, Facts & People

    Is BlacKkKlansman Based on a True Story? Real Events, Facts & People

    [ad_1]

    BlacKkKlansman chronicles the story of Ron Stallworth, a black detective who uses his white colleague as a proxy and infiltrates the Ku Klux Klan. He establishes a connection with them and eventually exposes their violent past. So, were Ron’s personal and professional challenges inspired by real events and facts, and is BlacKkKlansman based on a true story? Let’s find out!

    Is BlacKkKlansman based on a true story?

    Yes, BlacKkKlansman is based on a true story, and is an adaptation of Ron Stallworth’s memoir, titled “Black Klansman.” Ron, an African American police officer from Colorado Springs, was able to pose as a white supremacist over the phone, while his white colleague, Flip Zimmerman attended the Ku Klux Klan meetings in person. The filmmakers take some creative liberties in presenting the story, but they capture the challenges that Ron faced during this operation, racial tensions, and prejudices of the 1970s.

    BlacKkKlansman’s real events and facts explained

    Along with the infiltration of the Ku Klux Klan, there are other elements in the film that mirror reality. For example, the phone conversations between Ron and David Duke, The Grand Wizard of the Klan are portrayed accurately, and they add a layer of tension to the story. The investigation to expose the Klan members is another real element, as Ron and Zimmerman work together to gather intelligence without raising any suspicions and prevented potential violence planned by the racist group. The film combines humor and social commentary to convey the gravity of the matter, but the core events are based on Ron’s real experiences.

    The real people behind BlacKkKlansman’s characters

    As the movie draws inspiration from Ron’s accounts, the characters are based on real-life individuals or composite characters. Along with the central figures that infiltrated the Klan, they accurately portray David Duke, who is a historical figure. Therefore, the movie retains its authenticity when it comes to the people involved, but it does incorporate some fictional elements in the narrative for cinematic impact.

    Is Ron Stallworth a real person?

    Yes, Ron is a real-life individual who wrote a memoir about his experience of infiltrating the Ku Klux Klan. He managed to defy racial and professional challenges, showcasing resilience and wit through his strategic plan and phone conversation. He not only exposed the Klan’s activities but also served as a symbol of resistance against racism and injustice.

    Is Flip Zimmerman a real person?

    Flip Zimmerman is not an actual person, but he is loosely based on Ron’s undercover white colleague who attended the meetings. Through his character, the film portrays the internal struggle of a man who navigates a dangerous world and the emotional toll it takes on someone to work in secrecy.

    Is David Duke a real person?

    David Duke is an actual person, who was the Grand Wizard of the Ku Klux Klan, and his presence highlights the systematic nature of racism in the 1970s. He was an antisemitic conspiracy theorist, white supremacist, and an American politician. In his writings, he also denied the Holocaust and supported several such controversial and racist ideologies.

    Charlie’s Angels vet Cameron Diaz has addressed recent behind-the-scenes rumors about Jamie Foxx’s behavior on the set of Netflix’s upcoming…

    Gravitas Ventures has released a new Killer trailer for the quarantine slasher by A.D. Smith. Killer Trailer Details a Deadly…

    Here’s Percy Jackson and the Olympians Episode 2’s ending explained featuring spoilers about Percy’s mother, his father, and his impending…

    Mandy Moore returns to television in Dr. Death Season 2, her first starring role since the conclusion of This Is…

    [ad_2]

    Sonika Kamble

    Source link

  • Soccer Star Jaiyah Saelua Has Complicated Feelings About ‘Next Goal Wins’

    Soccer Star Jaiyah Saelua Has Complicated Feelings About ‘Next Goal Wins’

    [ad_1]

    When Next Goal Wins, a film from director Taika Waititi about the triumphant transformation of American Samoa’s failing national men’s soccer team, premiered at the Toronto International Film Festival, one of the real-life players depicted in the movie accompanied the filmmaker and former coach, Thomas Rongen, for an onstage Q&A.

    Her name is Jaiyah Saelua, and she’s a center fielder who is fa’afafine, a third gender that is widely accepted in Samoan culture. When asked about what portions of the film were true, she replied that, while “a lot of it was accurate, for the sake of entertainment, we understand that he’ll do as he pleases,” gesturing towards Waititi. “Never let the truth get in the way of a good story,” he joked in return.

    But while the film spotlights Michael Fassbender as Rongen, the hard-edged American coach who relocates to revive the team’s dismal record, it’s hard to imagine a narrative more compelling than the one happening left of center. Saelua joined the national team at age 15, becoming the first openly trans and nonbinary athlete to compete in a FIFA World Cup qualifier. Her story is groundbreaking, but not the one that Waititi and cowriter Iain Morris (What We Do in the Shadows) chose to primarily tell.

    The movie, which shares a name and subject with Mike Brett and Steve Jamison’s 2014 documentary and is now in theaters, celebrates Saelua, who is played by nonbinary actor Kaimana. Team manager Tavita (played by Oscar Kightley) refers to her as “the Cindy Crawford of soccer” and fa’afafine people as flowers: “It’d be a pretty dark world without them.” But things get off to a rocky start between player and coach. The film’s version of Rongen doesn’t accept Saelua’s identity, going so far as to misgender and deadname her multiple times before she pummels him to the ground.

    When I ask the real-life Saelua what her actual relationship with Rongen is like, she laughs slightly. “Not bad,” she tells Vanity Fair. “He was the coach. I was a player. That’s basically what it was. The only time he used my legal name at the time was during the roll calls and only because it’s what’s on the roster.” Saelua notes that she didn’t change her name legally until 2017. “But it was a nice little twist to make Thomas into—or make Fassbender into—sort of a villain in the movie. The things he does are the problems of the movie, and not so much the losses of the team.”

    Thomas Rongen, Jaiyah Saelua and Taika Waititi attend the Next Goal Wins premiere during the 2023 Toronto International Film Festival.Frazer Harrison/Getty Images.

    [ad_2]

    Savannah Walsh

    Source link

  • The Truth Behind the Hidden Demon in ‘The Exorcist’

    The Truth Behind the Hidden Demon in ‘The Exorcist’

    [ad_1]

    I had seen The Exorcist before, but it was an even more disturbing experience to watch it frame by frame. That’s what my friends and I did in the early 1990s, when we were high school students working on a class project about the history of subliminal messaging in media.

    We adjusted the levels on the most sophisticated stereo we could find to isolate that part at the very end of the Beatles’ “Strawberry Fields Forever” where a distorted voice supposedly says, “I buried Paul.” A generation before us, that short clip of audio fortified conspiracy theories that Paul McCartney (still with us today) had actually died in 1966. We studied a 1973 book called Subliminal Seduction by Wilson Bryan Key, about how covert messages could be deployed as sales tools. The five of us struggled to find the nude figures he claimed were hidden in the ice cubes of old liquor ads. (And some of us were really looking.)

    We also went to the video store to rent a copy of The Exorcist, which had long been rumored to contain subliminal imagery aimed at disturbing viewers in ways they could never fully comprehend. We tried to go frame by frame through the 1973 demonic-possession film, or at least moment by moment, as painstakingly as the crude tech of pausing and unpausing a VHS player would allow.

    Then we found something. The young priest Father Karras (played by Jason Miller) has a dream about his recently deceased mother descending the steps into a subway station with an agonized expression on her face. We Catholic school kids understood what that represented—a descent into hell, no doubt. But that was symbolism, not subliminal-ism. In the midst of that sequence, however, comes a split-second flash followed by the momentary appearance of a horrid white face, sneering with decayed teeth, eyes pooling in red sores. It’s terrifying—but barely perceptible.

    The face appears for only a handful of frames, and while that might be enough for a viewer to briefly register the image, it’s not long enough for one to actually grasp it. Moviegoers in 1973 would have been left unsure about what, if anything, they had just seen, creating fertile ground for terror. We counted that as proof that there really were subliminal techniques at play in The Exorcist.

    While that pallid demonic face is unnerving, it’s also clearly a person in makeup, deliberately slipped into the edit. But as we continued to parse the movie, we found something our minds couldn’t explain as easily.

    It happens about 49 minutes into the film, when the possessed young girl, Regan (played by Linda Blair), thrashes on her bed as a team of doctors visit her home. Her eyes roll back and her throat bulges grotesquely (both effectively creepy makeup effects). Then she vaults onto her feet, hauls back her hand, and knocks one of the approaching doctors across the room.

    There are a lot of rapid cuts in the sequence, and as we paused and unpaused, looking for hidden images, we saw the young girl’s face suddenly distort. Her eyes became fathomless black pits, her hair appeared to curl into horns, and her face suddenly became more stoic and imposing. We halted on the image, staring at those empty sockets.

    [ad_2]

    Anthony Breznican

    Source link

  • ‘The Beanie Bubble’ Burst: Inside Billionaire Ty Warner’s Furry Empire

    ‘The Beanie Bubble’ Burst: Inside Billionaire Ty Warner’s Furry Empire

    [ad_1]

    Mild spoilers for The Beanie Bubble ahead.

    One week after the pop cultural dominance of Barbenheimer, we’re getting a new film about both a beloved toy and a man whose invention leads to unforeseen fallout. At the center of that Venn diagram is The Beanie Bubble, which follows the boom-and-bust of the ’90s Beanie Baby craze, and is now streaming on AppleTV+. “There are parts of the truth you just can’t make up. The rest, we did,” reads a cheeky disclaimer at the start of the film, which is based on Zac Bissonnette’s 2015 book, The Great Beanie Baby Battle: Mass Delusion and the Dark Side of Cute.

    Founder Ty Warner’s first name graces each heart-shaped Beanie Baby tag. But the toy’s story is told through the perspective of three women who figured prominently in its rise. Robbie (Elizabeth Banks), Sheila (Sarah Snook), and Maya (Geraldine Viswanathan) are fictional characters, broadly based on three women in the life of Ty Warner, played in the film by Zach Galifianakis.

    In the film, Warner’s first business is selling stuffed Himalayan cats with Robbie, who is inspired by his real-life ex-girlfriend and business partner Patricia Roche—also known as the namesake for Beanie Baby “Patti the Platypus.”

    Sheila, meanwhile, was inspired by lighting designer Faith McGowan, another of Warner’s former girlfriends. In the film, she gives their relationship a shot only after he bonds with her two children. As McGowan’s daughter Lauren Boldebuck told Chicago Magazine in 2014, her mother really “didn’t really like [Warner] at first.”

    Screenwriter Kristin Gore (daughter of Al) not only adapted the screenplay, but codirected the film with her husband, OK Go lead singer Damian Kulash Jr. She shows Warner conceiving of Beanie Babies when Sheila’s daughters request “softer” stuffed animals that are small enough to fit in their backpacks. “Legs the Frog,” Ty Inc.’s first official Beanie Baby, was born in 1993. But the animals, which were intentionally under-stuffed to increase posability, gathered dust on shelves and at trade shows. “Their big launch was a total flop—couldn’t sell Beanies for two years,” says Maya, a college freshman initially hired to “brush and tweeze the display cats” and answer phones at Ty Inc. In the film, interest piques only when she suggests to a buyer that a certain animal is a limited edition. Maya is a proxy for Lina Trivedi, described in Bissonnette’s book as “the $12-per-hour sociology major who made Ty Warner a billionaire.” Only the 12th employee ever at the company, Trivedi, like Maya, is credited with launching the product line’s website, writing custom poems for each Beanie (she once penned 86 in only three days), and introducing Warner to the lucrative world of eBay.

    The business model of Beanie was built on the illusion of scarcity. Warner would limit the number of Beanie Babies any seller was allowed to purchase and “retire” certain models at his whim. Soon, word spread about the stuffed animal, from Ty Inc.’s Chicago headquarters throughout the Midwest. Because of the perception that demand exceeded supply, Beanies—which were sold for $5 in stores—would fetch on average six times that on eBay, where collectors hoarding the product could command a pretty penny.

    Within five years of its creation, the Beanie Baby brand had surpassed $1.4 billion in its annual sales and comprised 10% of all purchases on eBay. Profits soared, in part, because Warner only sold to smaller gift shops—retailers with less competing toy product and the ability to prominently display the Beanies. “By keeping them in the mom-and-pops, you kept them really loyal to Ty,” Bill Harlow of Ty Canada told Bissonnette in his book. In the film, we see Warner refusing to meet with Wal-Mart and Toys “R” Us. He also turns down a Barbie tie-in with Mattel and a call from Steven Spielberg’s office because he’s “not a sellout.” McDonald’s, however, proved to be an exception to Warner’s rule, in both real life and the film.

    Maya tells Warner that such a partnership could backfire: “It would be like a Super Bowl ad for a bake sale,” she says. Undeterred, in 1997, McDonald’s produces 100 million Teenie Beanie Babies as part of an exclusive Happy Meals promotion. Consumers flock to the golden arches in droves. That part is factual: “Some customers ordered a hundred Happy Meals and asked the cashier to keep the food,” wrote Bissonnette. One Ohio location had employees answer the phones with a status update, “Good morning, McDonald’s. We have the moose and the lamb.” One McDonald’s employee was arrested for stealing $6,000 worth of Teenie Beanies.

    PAUL J. RICHARDS/Getty Images

    That wasn’t the only dark scenario to emerge in the rush for plush. Beanie mania led to theft, a trade dispute during the Clinton administration, and even death in a 1999 altercation outside of a Hallmark store. An estranged couple in Las Vegas squatted on the ground of a courtroom to divy up their Beanie collection as part of a contentious divorce proceeding. And lives were put in danger when onlookers in Atlanta stopped their vehicles to salvage stock that spilled from a truck carrying Beanie Babies. As Bissonette writes, the Beanie train “had driven a large swath of America into a state of greed-fueled delusion”

    [ad_2]

    Savannah Walsh

    Source link

  • Flamin’ Hot Scam: Did the Self-Proclaimed Flamin’ Hot Cheetos Creator Sell a Spicy Lie?

    Flamin’ Hot Scam: Did the Self-Proclaimed Flamin’ Hot Cheetos Creator Sell a Spicy Lie?

    [ad_1]

    Mild spoilers for Flamin’ Hot ahead.

    “I’m probably the most uneducated, brilliant person you will ever meet,” Richard Montañez (played by Jesse Garcia) declares at the start of Flamin’ Hot, a new film about the creation of Flamin’ Hot Cheetos now streaming on Hulu and Disney+. It’s something the real Montañez once said in an interview, a phrase that reflects the rags-to-riches fairy tale he’s spun as the self-proclaimed inventor of the titular billion-dollar spicy snack.

    Montañez is a former janitor at Frito-Lay who climbed the corporate ranks, moving from cleaning machinery at the Frito-Lay plant in Rancho Cucamonga, California, to eventually become a vice president at Frito-Lay’s parent company, PepsiCo. For years he’s been selling the story of his rise at corporations and prestigious universities, for appearance fees of $10,000 to $50,000 per speaking engagement. 

    According to Montañez’s original lore (and the movie), Montañez was raised in Southern California. He struggled to learn English and support his family before landing a job at Frito-Lay’s Rancho Cucamonga plant in 1976, he said in a 2021 interview. More than a decade into his tenure at Frito-Lay, Montañez said, Pepsi’s newly instated CEO, Roger Enrico (played by Tony Shalhoub in the film), inspired him to “act like an owner.” Soon, Montañez noticed similarities in shape between elote (grilled corn on the cob topped with chili powder) and Cheetos. Inspiration struck. Montañez then brought unseasoned chips home for experimentation. After toting a trash bag of naked chips from factory floor to his home kitchen, he, his wife Judy (Annie Gonzalez), and his family stumbled upon crunchy, dusty, burning eureka. 

    Unaware of company protocol (“I don’t think I could spell the word at the time, let alone know what it meant,” he told CBS), Montañez said he cold-called Enrico to pitch him Flamin’ Hot Cheetos in 1991. The only snag? CBS reports that the name Flamin’ Hot had already been trademarked by Pepsi, and according to the Los Angeles Times, the product was being test-marketed in cities including Chicago, Detroit, and Houston

    It would be another two decades before Montañez’s account was challenged. In May 2021, shortly before the release of his second memoir, titled Flamin’ Hot: The Incredible True Story of One Man’s Rise From Janitor to Top Executive, the Los Angeles Times published an exposé. After conducting interviews with more than a dozen former Frito-Lay employees and poring through company archival records, the paper concluded that Montañez’s claims were embellished, if not totally false. “Montañez made it, from rags to riches, from factory floor to corporate suite,” reporter Sam Dean wrote. “He just didn’t make Flamin’ Hot Cheetos.”

    In reality, according to the Times, the spicy snack’s origin dates back to 1989, thousands of miles from Southern California, at the corporate offices of Frito-Lay’s headquarters in Plano, Texas. Lynne Greenfeld, then a junior employee who’d just earned an MBA, was tasked with developing the product. While Montañez has been touting his triumph since the late 2000s, Greenfeld tells the Times that she didn’t know this until 2018, when she contacted Frito-Lay and triggered an internal investigation. “It is disappointing that 20 years later, someone who played no role in this project would begin to claim our experience as his own and then personally profit from it,” she told the Times. 

    [ad_2]

    Savannah Walsh

    Source link

  • ‘Babylon’: The Myths and True Stories That Inspired the Classic Hollywood Epic

    ‘Babylon’: The Myths and True Stories That Inspired the Classic Hollywood Epic

    [ad_1]

    With its riotous orgies, perilous sets, and nonstop meltdowns, Damien Chazelle’s Babylon is a Hollywood fantasy—but one that constantly leans on history. 

    Though the film has its own unorthodox versions of the hair and makeup of the period, Babylon is set primarily in the last days of silent film through the early talkies, from 1926 to about 1933. Characters like ambitious starlet Nellie LaRoy (Margot Robbie), established leading man Jack Conrad (Brad Pitt), and a handful of supporting players are fictional, but if they feel familiar, that’s because they should. Those savvy about film history will also recognize some tall tales from Kenneth Anger’s Hollywood Babylon, which lends part of its title and a lot of its attitude to Chazelle’s epic.

    Ahead, a guide to where Babylon draws from reality—and where it diverges from it—plus some silent films and early talkies worth catching up with if you want to know more about what happened and why this era is worth remembering.   

    Nellie LaRoy and Clara Bow

    Our leading lady is Nellie LaRoy, played by Margot Robbie as a hedonistic wild child whom the camera loves. Babylon’s official press materials describe Nellie as a mix of several stars, but the main model couldn’t be more obvious: Clara Bow, born and raised in Brooklyn, then one of the toughest parts of a notoriously tough city. She endured a horrific childhood of neglect, minimal schooling, and physical and sexual abuse. Like Clara Bow, Nellie has a broad accent, though Nellie’s is said to be from across the river in New Jersey. Babylon also adds drug addictions that Clara didn’t have. Still, Nellie’s character hits beat after beat familiar from David Stenn’s definitive biography, Runnin’ Wild: the mental illness in the family, the sleazy and sniveling father (Eric Roberts), Bow’s rejection by the Hollywood elite. 

    [ad_2]

    Farran Nehme

    Source link

  • Vision Films Presents MURDER on the CAPE, Based on the Christa Worthington Murder

    Vision Films Presents MURDER on the CAPE, Based on the Christa Worthington Murder

    [ad_1]

    Press Release



    updated: Sep 27, 2017

    Vision Films is proud to present MURDER ON THE CAPE, based on the 2002 Cape Cod murder of Christa Worthington. Written and directed by Arthur Egeli, MURDER ON THE CAPE is a stunning and deeply human retelling of the case that shocked the nation.

    The film stars Jade Harlow (Passions, The Bay), Josh Walther (Eugene O’Neill: Art as Life), Chris Lazzaro (Jersey Shore Massacre), Heather Egeli (Ghost Forest ) and Tim Misuradze (The Young and The Restless).

    It struck me while I was watching this film that there was even more to the typical ‘torn from the headlines’ movie, it is a compelling murder mystery, where a real ‘who done it’ is unfolding before our eyes in the news.

    Lise Romanoff, Managing Director, Vision Films

    MURDER ON THE CAPE is available on Digital for an SRP $4.99 – $9.99 Rent or Buy across all platforms and to Buy on DVD for $14.95.

    MURDER ON THE CAPE is based on the true story of New York fashion writer Christa Worthington, who has an affair with a married fisherman while spending a winter holiday in Cape Cod. She returns two years later with his child looking to rekindle their love. When she is found murdered, a mystery unfolds within the tight-knit community, shedding doubt on the prime suspect’s guilt.

    “The heart of the story is that there were all these personal struggles that you cannot read in a book about the crime,” director Arthur Egeli says. “You don’t get to see how everything affects each other, so we produced a narrative film about the characters who all had unique perspectives.”

    Get MURDER ON THE CAPE

    Amazon: http://bit.ly/MurderontheCape-Amazon

    Vimeo On Demand: https://vimeo.com/ondemand/murderonthecape

    FandangoNow: https://www.fandangonow.com/details/movie/murder-on-the-cape-2017/MMVF15B8E8E70C0E067F877099D8DCC882FC

    http://www.Facebook.com/capemovie

    ABOUT VISION FILMS:

    Vision Films is an Independent Worldwide Distributor and VOD Aggregator of over 800 Feature Films, Documentaries and Music Programs from some of the most prolific independent film producers in the world.   Led by Lise Romanoff, Managing Director/CEO Worldwide Distribution, Vision Films releases 2-4 films a month, across Theatrical, VOD, DVD, and television. www.visionfilms.net

    We are excited to present MURDER ON THE CAPE for review, and editorial inclusion. Review links are available; request yours today!  

    PRESS CONTACTS:

    Nicole Newton-Plater

    For Vision Films

    Nicole@ppmg.info

    310-860-7774

    Source: Popular Press Media Group

    [ad_2]

    Source link