[ad_1]
Sanctions can strike the often-radical Islamist network a piece at a time.
[ad_2]
The Editorial Board
Source link
[ad_1]
Sanctions can strike the often-radical Islamist network a piece at a time.
[ad_2]
The Editorial Board
Source link
[ad_1]
President Trump moved Monday to classify the broad left-wing, anti-fascist movement known as antifa as a domestic terrorist organization, opening up a new front in his battle with political foes and raising legal and ethical questions about how the U.S. government can prosecute a movement.
“Antifa is a militarist, anarchist enterprise that explicitly calls for the overthrow of the United States Government, law enforcement authorities, and our system of law,” Trump wrote in an executive order. “It uses illegal means to organize and execute a campaign of violence and terrorism nationwide to accomplish these goals.”
Militant activists who identify with Antifa have espoused an uncompromising philosophy of zero tolerance for fascists. Since the Republican president took office in 2017, protesters — concealing their identities with masks, dressing head to toe in black — have sparred with police to block a right–wing provocateur speaking at UC Berkeley, confronted alt-right demonstrators with sticks, shields and chemical irritants in Charlottesville, Va., stormed a federal courthouse while protesting police brutality in Portland, Ore., and lobbed rocks at law enforcement as federal immigration agents ratcheted up raids in Los Angeles.
But critics warn Trump is utilizing right-wing activist Charlie Kirk’s recent killing to launch a sweeping government crackdown on his political opponents — and crush their constitutional rights to free speech and free assembly.
“I am very concerned that these actions are meant to punish disfavored dissent,” said Brian Levin, founder of the Center for the Study of Hate and Extremism at Cal State San Bernardino.
In his order, Trump instructed all relevant federal departments and agencies to use their authority to “investigate, disrupt, and dismantle any and all illegal operations — especially those involving terrorist actions — conducted by Antifa or any person claiming to act on behalf of Antifa.”
Trump claimed his administration would also investigate and prosecute anyone who funded such an operation.
As justification, Trump cited recent protests that took place in L.A. and across the nation. Antifa, he said, used “coordinated efforts to obstruct enforcement of Federal laws through armed standoffs with law enforcement, organized riots, violent assaults on Immigration and Customs Enforcement and other law enforcement officers, and routine doxing of and other threats against political figures and activists.”
Trump is fixating on left-wing violence even as data show U.S. extremists come from across the ideological spectrum: A 2024 federal report — recently purged from the Department of Justice website — stated that far-right extremists have killed more Americans than any other group and outpace “all other types of terrorism and domestic violent extremists.”
To Levin, the administration’s laser focus on antifa, a diffuse movement that does not rely on traditional hierarchies, risks threatening “the civil liberties, not of perpetrators of violence, but the far larger and more visible civil society network of peaceful supporters, messengers and funders.” Experts say some of the groups are highly organized at a local level, but don’t have national or international coordination, as far as we know, or public leaders.
There is no evidence that Tyler Robinson, the 22-year-old suspect in Kirk’s murder, was affiliated with antifa or any other network. According to his mother, he had “started to lean more to the left, becoming more pro-gay and trans-rights oriented.” Officials have said that in a text thread with his partner, Robinson said he killed Kirk because he “had enough of his hatred.”
As Kirk’s shooting triggers furious debate on the perils of left versus right political violence, there is little consensus among Americans on what extremism is, who is perpetrating it and when it is justified.
A significant swath of Americans, some experts note, tend to excuse or ignore violence on their side and not recognize it as terrorism if they sympathize with the cause.
“The biggest problem we face is that there’s no agreement on what terrorism is and it’s become completely subjective,” said Bruce Hoffman, senior fellow for counter-terrorism and homeland security at the Council on Foreign Relations.
“Luigi Mangione, for example, is he a terrorist?” Hoffman asked. “I would say yes. … But look, there’s a sold-out musical about him!”
What is antifa?
The term “antifa” — short for anti–fascist — was coined in Germany nearly a century ago, as shorthand for the Communist Party-affiliated Antifaschistische Aktion (Anti-Fascist Action) group that mobilized against Adolf Hitler and was brutally crushed when he came to power.
According to Mark Bray, a professor of history at Rutgers University, the term was picked up across Europe in the 1980s and ’90s and adopted by a broad swath of leftists, anarchists and anti-authoritarian socialists.
“Antifa is a kind of politics of pan radical left militant opposition to the far right,” said Bray, an ally of the movement and author of “Antifa: The Anti-Fascist Handbook.”
In uniting socialists, anarchists, communists and other leftists to organize against what they perceive as a common threat, Bray said, antifa is like feminism.
“There are feminist groups,” he noted, “but feminism itself is not a group.”
The first U.S. organization to adopt the name was Rose City Antifa, founded in Portland in 2007. It’s goal, according to its website, is “to create a world without fascism” and “ensure that there are consequences for fascists who spread their hate and violence in our city.”
“We are unapologetic about the reality that fighting fascism at points requires physical militancy,” Rose City Antifa said in 2017 before facing off with far-right groups and police at a pro-Trump march.
Other groups across the U.S., such as NYC Antifa and Antifa Sacramento, are part of the same loose anti-fascist network, but many do not explicitly call themselves antifa. There is no central organization, no command, headquarters or formal membership list.
The movement has grown in response to the rise of Trump.
“Suddenly, anarchists and antifa, who have been demonized and sidelined by the wider Left have been hearing from liberals and Leftists, ‘you’ve been right all along,’” the anarchist, antifascist journal, It’s Going Down, said in 2016 after clashes broke out on a Texas campus as protesters tried to cancel an alt-right speaker.
Could Trump designate antifa a terrorist group?
Many national security experts agree that Trump would be cutting a radically new path if he designated antifa as a terrorism organization: The U.S. does not have a domestic terrorism law, and Trump does not have the authority to designate antifa a foreign terrorist organization without approval from Congress.
“While the FBI has confirmed that antifa and other extremists are subjects of ongoing domestic terrorism investigations, it declines to designate any organization a “‘domestic terrorist organization,” a 2020 congressional report said. “Doing so may infringe on First Amendment-protected free speech — belonging to an ideological group in and of itself is not a crime in the United States.”
Trump could try to go after antifa as an international organization, Hoffman said, pointing out that there are antifa cells active abroad. But it would be a stretch to designate antifa an international terrorist group because there’s no known international command, control or coordination.
“It’s not like al Qaeda or ISIS, where you have a command or an emir in charge giving orders,” Hoffman said. “It’s an ideological affinity. Nothing more.”
Is antifa engaged in domestic terrorism?
According to the FBI, terrorism is “the unlawful use of force or violence against persons or property to intimidate or coerce a Government or civilian population in furtherance of political or social objectives.”
For the Trump administration, the case is clear.
“Left-wing organizations have fueled violent riots, organized attacks against law enforcement officers, coordinated illegal doxing campaigns, arranged drop points for weapons and riot materials, and more,” a White House spokesperson said in a statement.
“These aren’t protests, these are crimes … where they are throwing bricks at cars of ICE and border patrol,” Trump said last week of the violence committed during demonstrations in Los Angeles over his administration’s immigration crackdown.
“They should be put in jail. What they’re doing to this country is really subversive.”
Bray rejected the idea that antifa is in any way a terrorist organization. “If by terrorists we mean something akin to Al Qaeda or ISIS with murdering people and blowing up buildings, it just is not any of that.”
However, Bray has written, most if not all antifa members “wholeheartedly support militant self-defense against the police and the targeted destruction of police and capitalist property.”
Hoffman argued that any acts of violence committed in pursuit of political goals constituted terrorism.
“Terrorism doesn’t have to be lethal to be terrorism,” he said. “There’s no doubt if violence, or the threat of violence, is being used in pursuit of a political motive, it’s terrorism. You have to call it out.”
A 2022 study from the University of Maryland’s National Consortium for the Study of Terrorism and Responses to Terrorism said U.S. data showed “left-wing radicals were less likely to use violence than right-wing and Islamist radicals.”
While the consortium says antifa poses “a relatively small threat,” it also noted “a recent increase in violent activity by antifa extremists, anarchists and related far-left extremists” — a trend it links to the “concurrent increase in violent far-right activity.”
Should the U.S. enact a law on domestic terrorism?
In the 1990s, when President Clinton tried to enact sweeping domestic terrorism laws, Hoffman said, Republicans raised concerns about 1st Amendment violations.
“The bottom line is back then it was as politicized as it is now,” Hoffman said. “If there’s a meeting, basically one side of the room wants to designate antifa and Black Lives Matter, and the other side of the room wants to designate Atomwaffen [Division] or the Base.”
Ultimately, Hoffman said, the U.S. does need a clear and precise law on domestic terrorism. But now was not the best time, he argued, as emotions are running too high after the Kirk shooting.
“If you’re going to go to these lengths, to change the laws of the United States, you have to have very firm, clear evidence,” he said. “At a time when talk show hosts are being deplatformed, when people are fired from their jobs, this is not the ideal moment to embrace profound changes in how we regard terrorism.”
[ad_2]
Jenny Jarvie
Source link
[ad_1]
President Donald Trump’s announcement that he will designate antifa a “major terrorist organization” left some legal experts puzzled.
“I am pleased to inform our many U.S.A. Patriots that I am designating ANTIFA, A SICK, DANGEROUS, RADICAL LEFT DISASTER, AS A MAJOR TERRORIST ORGANIZATION,” Trump wrote Sept. 17 on Truth Social. “I will also be strongly recommending that those funding ANTIFA be thoroughly investigated in accordance with the highest legal standards and practices. Thank you for your attention to this matter!”
Trump’s announcement came after conservative influencer Charlie Kirk’s Sept. 10 assassination. Trump’s officials have said the killing was incited by extremists on the political left. Investigators said the suspect acted alone, and in releasing charges against Tyler Robinson, 22, prosecutors made no mention of antifa.
This isn’t the first time Trump has said he wants to designate antifa as a terrorist organization. He said it in 2020, after the death of George Floyd in Minneapolis police custody. Back then, politicians, pundits and social media posts blamed antifa, saying it had picked fights with police and looted businesses. But government intelligence reports, media reports and experts offered no evidence that antifa played any significant role in those events.
Short for “anti-fascist,” the antifa movement has an amorphous structure and its domestic roots present legal obstacles for Trump’s plan to declare it a terrorist organization, experts said.
Antifa is a broad, loosely affiliated coalition of left-wing activists.
Although it is widely considered a political movement, antifa is not an organization with an official membership, leader or base for operations, and it is often organized into autonomous local groups.
Its adherents typically rally against white supremacy and other causes, at times resorting to violence. The antifa movement goes back decades, but regained attention during counterprotests against white nationalists in Charlottesville, Virginia, in August 2017.
In his book “Antifa: The Anti-Fascist Handbook,” historian Mark Bray traced the modern antifa movement to German and Italian leftist groups that fought proto-fascist gangs following World War I.
Antifa activists often use social media and encrypted apps to target right-wing activists and communicate with one another. The oldest antifa cell is Rose City Antifa in Portland, Oregon, with similar organizations in several other cities.
Antifa activists are “predominantly communists, socialists and anarchists who reject turning to the police or the state to halt the advance of white supremacy,” Bray wrote in a 2017 Washington Post column. They often wear black clothing or bandanas over their faces to stay anonymous in crowds.
“Multiple independent reviews of incidents from the past decade — including analyses of FBI and Department of Homeland Security reporting, the Global Terrorism Database, and congressional testimony — show zero terrorist attacks attributed to Antifa,” said Gary LaFree, a University of Maryland professor emeritus of criminology and criminal justice and former director of the National Consortium for the Study of Terrorism and Responses to Terrorism.
LaFree said in a Sept. 18 email to PolitiFact that attacks that meet the definition of terrorism are “overwhelmingly carried out by far-right extremists, jihadist-inspired actors, or — less frequently — other movements.”
National security experts told PolitiFact back in 2020, there is no legal process for designating domestic groups as terrorist organizations. Experts now say that the law has not changed.
“The Secretary of State has authority to designate foreign terrorist groups, but there is no parallel authority to designate (a) domestic terrorist group,” Faiza Patel, a senior director of the Brennan Center’s Liberty and National Security Program, told PolitiFact.
The State Department and Treasury Department make designations to the Foreign Terrorist Organizations list, but there is no equivalent government list for domestic terrorist organizations.
When the government designates a person or group as a Foreign Terrorist Organization, its members are inadmissible to the United States, and their assets and money in the U.S. are frozen so they don’t have access to it.
Michael German, a fellow with the Brennan Center for Justice’s Liberty and National Security Program, told PolitiFact in 2020 that because antifa isn’t an organized group — it has no leaders, assets, or infrastructure — “banning material support to foreign anti-fascist groups would have little legitimate anti-terrorism effect here or abroad.”
“Domestic terrorism” is defined in federal law, but it is not considered a federal crime. In domestic terrorism investigations, prosecutors end up charging suspects with offenses such as hate crimes, murder or weapons violations. Thirty-two states and Washington D.C. have laws that criminalize acts of domestic terrorism.
So when Trump said he would designate antifa as a terrorist organization, it’s unclear who exactly his administration would be targeting or what kind of consequences that label would carry. We asked the White House how they plan to execute this designation, but we did not hear back.
Patel said an executive order designating antifa a “terrorist organization” and pursuing action against entities “funding antifa” could face court challenge.
[ad_2]
[ad_1]
President Donald Trump said he will designate “antifa” as a terrorist group.
“I am pleased to inform our many U.S.A. Patriots that I am designating ANTIFA, A SICK, DANGEROUS, RADICAL LEFT DISASTER, AS A MAJOR TERRORIST ORGANIZATION,” Trump posted on Truth Social.
“I will also be strongly recommending that those funding ANTIFA be thoroughly investigated in accordance with the highest legal standards and practices. Thank you for your attention to this matter!”
Related: What is antifa, and can Donald Trump label it a ‘terrorist’ group?
Related: Louisiana Republican demands social media companies delete anti-Charlie Kirk posts & ban users
But there is no organization named “antifa.” Rather, antifa is short for anti-fascist and references a political movement. The term was popularized around the time of the Occupy Wall Street movement. Occupy organizer Mark Bray wrote a book by that name, published in 2017.
The term grew in popularity after Trump was elected to office for his first term in 2016. The term has most commonly been embraced by anarchists and anti-capitalist groups.
But right-wing politicians and commentators have often blamed the movement for violent extremism motivated by the left, even at times trying to assign blame for activity orchestrated on the right.
Related: Charlie Kirk DID say stoning gay people was the ‘perfect law’ — and these other heinous quotes
Trump announced his direction. days after the murder of conservative activist Charlie Kirk and reports the gunman had anti-fascism messages on ammonization clips (though not any transgender messaging, despite prior leaks to the press from the FBI).
The State Department designates a list of Foreign Terrorist Organizations, one that includes several formations of theocratic groups like ISIS and al-Qaeda, transcontinental gangs like Tren de Aragua, MS-13 and Boko Haram, and violent political factions like the New Irish Republic Army. Since the start of Trump’s second term, 14 groups have been added to this list.
But efforts by the federal government to fight domestic terrorism have typically focused on individuals. The current list of most wanted domestic terrorists includes some people who are affiliated with political movements, including the Animal Liberation Front and Black Panthers, but those groups have not been designated as terrorist organizations.
Trump notably also said in 2020 that he wanted to designate “antifa” as a terrorist group, something noted in the congressional record at the time. The FBI declined to designate antifa as a domestic terrorist organization, with then-FBI Director Christopher Wray saying the agency did not investigate ideology.
This article originally appeared on Advocate: Donald Trump tries — again — to designate ‘antifa’ as a terrorist organization
[ad_2]
[ad_1]
Rutherford County Mayor Joe Carr demands the censure of a county commissioner for calling the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement a “terrorist organization.”
Carr, a Republican, criticized Rutherford County Commissioner Hope Oliver for what the elected Democrat said about ICE during an Aug. 25 Public Safety Committee meeting.
Oliver’s comment in question followed public comment speakers’ concerns about the presence of ICE in Rutherford County.
“ICE has been an organization that’s been around for a long time, but it has not been emboldened (as) a terrorist organization like it’s turning out to be,” said Oliver, who represents a District 1 with many minoritiese in north La Vergne. Audience members responded with loud applause and hollers to show their agreement.
Rutherford County Commissioner Hope Oliver, for District 1 speaks out at a Public Safety Committee meeting, on Monday, Aug. 25, 2025, where many people spoke out and demonstrated against the possibility of the Rutherford County Sheriff’s Department signing a a contract with ICE.
Oliver’s comments come after President Donald Trump ordered ICE in January to carry out significant detainments and deportations of immigrants without documented legal status to be in the U.S.
The president’s One Big Beautiful Bill Act, passed by Congress this summer, also includes extra funding to support ICE efforts.
‘It’s inhumane to tear families apart’: Middle Tennessee residents protest Rutherford County Sheriff’s ICE partnership
Regan Gomez holds a ÒICE Out of TennesseeÓ sign along with other anti-ICE signs during the public speaking portion of the Rutherford County Public Safety Committee meeting on Monday, Aug. 25, 2025.
The county mayor two days after the public safety meeting rebuked the comments from Oliver about ICE on a WGNS Radio show.
“A terrorist organization, as defined by the U.S. government, is like Mexican cartels enslaving of children for sex trafficking, raping women and beheading men,” Carr told The Daily News Journal Sept. 2.
“It was a horribly egregious and a horrible thing to say.”
Joe Carr
The mayor said ICE agents should not be compared to terrorists.
“They are just enforcing the laws of the country for those who are here unlawfully,” Carr said.
A former state representative from 2008-2014, Carr advocated for Tennessee legislation on immigration policy, including a law in 2011 requiring employers to use the federal government’s E-Verify online records to confirm the eligibility of employees to work in the U.S.
Carr also touts about writing the nation’s first state law prohibiting sanctuary cities in 2009.
The mayor suggested the Republican majority 21-member County Commission hold Oliver accountable by censuring her unless she’s willing to recant what she said and apologize. The commission also includes two Democrats and three independents.
Dispute among Republicans in 2024: GOP conflict erupts in email between chairman, Mayor Carr about Property Assessor seat
Hope Oliver
Oliver told the DNJ that she stands by what she said about unidentifiable ICE agents.
“We see it every day in the media masked (ICE agents) attacking people and terrorizing people,” Oliver said.
“They are claiming to be ICE, but they are not showing any identification, no warrants, and they’re masked. How do we know who they are? That is not right.”
Oliver said local law enforcement officers identify themselves.
“They are a part of our community,” said Oliver, who noted the presence of school resource officers and others in law enforcement.
“We see them in the grocery store. We go to church with them. We see them at the ball game. We know who they are.”
County Commission election results 2022: 21-member Rutherford County Commission will see new faces with 9 elected officials
Commissioner Oliver during the Aug. 25 public safety committee meeting praised local law enforcement.
Oliver also told the DNJ that immigrants detained by ICE “need to have due process.”
“It’s racial profiling,” Oliver said. “You don’t see them picking up white people. They are picking up brown and black people.”
Oliver said Carr’s opinion of her comments is “his problem, not mine.”
“As far as rebuke is concerned, his party has someone in office (who has been investigated on charges of) inciting an insurrection (that led to) assaulting and killing of police officers,” Oliver said.
“So the rebuke needs to start within his own party.”
Oliver’s comments to the DNJ allude to Trump’s speech to supporters — which has been criticized by some — ahead of the Capitol riot on Jan. 6, 2021, when Congress was in session to certify the election of then Democratic President-elect Joe Biden.
‘Embarrassing and terrible’: Rutherford County leaders react to riot at US Capitol Jan. 6, 2021
Matt Fee
Matt Fee, the chair of the Rutherford County Democratic Party, responded to the mayor’s radio comments by posting a social media video in support of what Oliver said about ICE.
“She did not say anything that was inaccurate,” Fee told the DNJ. “What else are you supposed to call ICE agents when they are all over the streets in America masked and unidentified. What they’re doing has a chilling affect on communities where they are afraid to call for police support when a crime is happening. What ICE is doing is not in support of public safety.”
Fee noted that he along with Oliver were among those who attended a town hall meeting in May pertaining to immigrants, law enforcement in La Vergne and emergency medical services.
La Vergne Police Chief Christopher Moews organized the town hall event because he suspects deportation fears might have contributed to a delayed emergency call for a 6-month-old baby, who died around Easter. The chief urged people at the meeting to call 911 for emergencies.
Impact of ICE enforcement: Death of 6-month-old baby ties to immigration, emergency service concerns in La Vergne
Craig Harris
Any effort by the county commission to censure Oliver would typically start with the Steering, Legislative and Governmental committee led by Chairman Craig Harris.
“We are not going to do that,” Harris told the DNJ. “I haven’t had any commissioner call me to do that.”
Harris also said he supports Rutherford County Sheriff Mike Fitzhugh’s approach in notifying ICE after the arrest of foreign-born people on criminal charges in Rutherford.
The sheriff told the audience at the Aug. 25 public safety meeting that his office since 1996 has adhered to any federal detainment warrant on immigrants for 48 hours after they’ve completed required sentences before release for ICE agents to pick up.
‘Damage is already done’: Rutherford school board rescinds resolution supporting border closure
Commissioner Harris said he disagrees with what Oliver said about ICE even if he opposes censuring her.
“She as a commissioner has a right to say whatever she wants,” said Harris, who announced June 24 that he’s campainging for county mayor in 2026 to replace Carr.
“I just think this is nothing but retaliation.”
Oliver and Harris in 2024 were among 11 commissioners who voted to censure Carr after the mayor had signed a constract for a solid waste transfer station project without first obtaining the required approval of the Purchasing Committee he leads as chairman.
Government accountability: Rutherford commission censures Mayor Joe Carr for signing waste contract without approval
The mayor disclosed his mistake on signing the solid waste transfer station contract before obtaining approval of the Purchasing Committee, which includes county commissioners distrustful of his leadership.
Carr said his call for the commission to censor Oliver for her public comments about ICE is not retaliation.
“She doesn’t get to falsely accuse ICE for doing what a terrorist organization does,” Carr said. “She has her facts wrong, and they are terribly distorted.”
Trash solution: Rutherford County officials celebrate ‘solid waste independence’ by opening transfer station
Carr contends that Oliver should be held accountable for what she said as an elected official at a public meeting about ICE.
“It is her First Amendment right, but she doesn’t get to exercise her First Amendment right with impunity,” the mayor said.
“As a public official, she doesn’t have a right to say things that are factually untrue without consequences.”
‘We can’t have nasty’: Altercation disrupts relationship of Mayor Joe Carr and commission
Reach reporter Scott Broden with news tips or questions by emailing him at sbroden@dnj.com. To support his work with The Daily News Journal, sign up for a digital subscription.
This article originally appeared on Murfreesboro Daily News Journal: Rutherford Co. Mayor Carr rebukes commissioner calling ICE terrorists
[ad_2]
[ad_1]
On Tuesday, New York City radio host Sid Rosenberg asked Secretary of State Marco Rubio about whether the State Department intends to designate the Muslim Brotherhood and Council on American-Islamic Relations as terrorist organizations. Rubio responded that “all of that is in the works,” although “obviously there are different branches of the Muslim Brotherhood, so you’d have to designate each one of them.”
Logistics and bureaucracy aside: It’s about time.
For far too long, the United States has treated the Muslim Brotherhood with a dangerous combination of naiveté and willful blindness. The Brotherhood is not a random innocuous political movement with a religious bent. It is, and has been since its founding about a century ago, the ideological wellspring of modern Sunni Islamism. The Brotherhood’s fingerprints are on jihadist groups as wide-ranging as Al Qaeda and Hamas, yet successive American administrations — Republican and Democratic alike — have failed to designate its various offshoots for what they are: terrorist organizations.
That failure is not merely academic. It has real-world consequences. By refusing to label the Muslim Brotherhood accurately, we tie our own hands in the fight against Islamism — both at home and abroad. We allow subversive actors to exploit our political system and bankroll extremism under the guise of “cultural” or “charitable” outreach.
Enough is enough.
Founded in Egypt in 1928 by Hassan al-Banna, the Muslim Brotherhood’s stated mission has never wavered: the establishment of a global caliphate governed by sharia law. The Brotherhood has always attempted to position itself as a “political” organization, but it is “political” in the way Lenin was political. Think subversion through infiltration — or revolution through stealth.
Consider Hamas. Hamas is not merely inspired by the Muslim Brotherhood — it is the Muslim Brotherhood’s Palestinian-Arab branch. The link is unambiguous; as Article Two of Hamas’ founding charter states, “The Islamic Resistance Movement is one of the wings of Moslem Brotherhood in Palestine.” And Hamas’ charter also makes clear its penchant for explicit violence: “Initiatives, and so-called peaceful solutions and international conferences, are in contradiction to the principles of the Islamic Resistance Movement.”
This is not the rhetoric of nuance or moderation. This is the ideological foundation of contemporary jihadism. Yet, while Hamas is rightly designated as a Foreign Terrorist Organization by the U.S. State Department, other branches of the Muslim Brotherhood remain off the list.
Why? Because Western elites have allowed themselves to be duped by the Brotherhood’s two-faced strategy. Abroad, they openly sow the seeds of jihad, cheer for a global caliphate and preach for the destruction of Israel and Western civilization more broadly. But in the corridors of power in the U.S. and Europe, they and their Qatari paymasters don suits and ties, rebrand as “moderates” and leverage media credulity and overly generous legal protections to plant ideological roots.
What’s more, CAIR — an unindicted co-conspirator in the largest terrorism financing trial in U.S. history — has extremely well-documented ties to the Brotherhood. And yet CAIR agents continue to operate freely in the United States, masquerading as civil rights advocates while pushing Islamist narratives that undermine the core constitutional principles of equality that they purport to champion. Today, almost two years after CAIR-linked Hamas executed the Oct. 7 pogrom in Israel, CAIR remains in good standing with many elected Democrats.
It shouldn’t be so. In November 2014, the United Arab Emirates designated CAIR as a terrorist organization, citing its links to the Brotherhood and Hamas. And the Brotherhood itself is recognized as a terrorist organization by at least Saudi Arabia, the UAE, Egypt, Bahrain and Russia. Jordan also banned the Brotherhood earlier this year. Put bluntly: There is absolutely no reason the United States should have a warmer approach toward CAIR than the UAE or a warmer approach toward the Brotherhood than Saudi Arabia.
The first Trump administration flirted with the idea of designating the Muslim Brotherhood a terrorist organization. It was the right impulse. But the effort was ultimately bogged down by internal bureaucracy and international pressure — most notably from Qatar and Turkey, both sometime U.S. partners that harbor strong Brotherhood sympathies and bankroll Islamist causes. And the second Trump administration’s troubling embrace of Qatar may well nip any designation in the bud before it even takes off.
Critics argue that such a designation would complicate relations with countries where Brotherhood affiliates participate in local politics. But since when did the U.S. place a premium on building alliances with the ideological cousins of Al Qaeda and ISIS?
Moreover, designating the Muslim Brotherhood would empower domestic law enforcement and intelligence agencies to go after its networks and financial infrastructure. It would send a clear signal that the U.S. government no longer accepts a claim of “nonviolent Islamism” as a pass when designating terrorist groups.
In a time when the threat from Islamic extremism remains global and decentralized, we can no longer afford to turn a blind eye to the architects of the movement. The Muslim Brotherhood is not, as “Arab Spring” boosters risibly claimed a decade and a half ago, a Western partner in “democracy.” It is the mother’s milk of modern Sunni jihadism.
The question is not whether we can afford to designate Muslim Brotherhood offshoots as terrorist organizations. It is: How much longer can we afford not to?
Josh Hammer’s latest book is “Israel and Civilization: The Fate of the Jewish Nation and the Destiny of the West.” This article was produced in collaboration with Creators Syndicate. @josh_hammer
L.A. Times Insights delivers AI-generated analysis on Voices content to offer all points of view. Insights does not appear on any news articles.
The following AI-generated content is powered by Perplexity. The Los Angeles Times editorial staff does not create or edit the content.
The Muslim Brotherhood should be designated as a terrorist organization by the United States, ending what the author characterizes as a dangerous combination of naiveté and willful blindness toward the group. The organization has served as the ideological wellspring of modern Sunni Islamism since its founding in Egypt in 1928, with stated goals of establishing a global caliphate governed by sharia law.
Hamas represents a direct branch of the Muslim Brotherhood, as explicitly stated in Article Two of Hamas’ founding charter, which declares “The Islamic Resistance Movement is one of the wings of Moslem Brotherhood in Palestine.” This connection demonstrates the Brotherhood’s clear ties to recognized terrorist organizations, yet other Brotherhood branches remain undesignated.
The Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) maintains well-documented ties to the Muslim Brotherhood and was an unindicted co-conspirator in the largest terrorism financing trial in U.S. history. Despite these connections, CAIR continues operating freely in the United States while pushing Islamist narratives under the guise of civil rights advocacy.
Multiple American allies have already taken decisive action, with the United Arab Emirates designating CAIR as a terrorist organization in 2014, and countries including Saudi Arabia, UAE, Egypt, Bahrain, and Russia recognizing the Brotherhood itself as a terrorist organization. Jordan banned the Brotherhood earlier this year, making American inaction increasingly inconsistent with international consensus.
Designation would empower domestic law enforcement and intelligence agencies to target Brotherhood networks and financial infrastructure while sending a clear signal that claims of “nonviolent Islamism” no longer provide protection from terrorist designations. The failure to act has real-world consequences, allowing subversive actors to exploit the American political system and bankroll extremism through supposed cultural or charitable outreach.
The search results do not contain substantial opposing perspectives to the author’s position on designating the Muslim Brotherhood as a terrorist organization. Secretary of State Marco Rubio confirmed that designation efforts are “in the works” but acknowledged significant legal and bureaucratic challenges that complicate the process[1].
Procedural complexities present obstacles to designation, as each regional branch of the Muslim Brotherhood must be formally designated separately due to the organization’s decentralized structure. Rubio noted that “we have to be very careful, because these things will be challenged in court” and emphasized the need to “show your work like a math problem” to withstand legal scrutiny[1].
Federal judicial oversight poses potential barriers to implementation, with Rubio expressing concern that “all you need is one federal judge—and there are plenty—that are willing to basically try to run the country from the bench” through nationwide injunctions that could block designation efforts[1].
[ad_2]
Josh Hammer
Source link