The UK’s data protection watchdog has issued a £14.47 million fine to Reddit for failing to protect the personal information of children.
An investigation by the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO), published on February 24, 2026, revealed that despite Reddit’s own terms of service prohibiting under-13s, the company lacked any robust age assurance mechanisms to enforce this rule until mid-2025.
This meant the platform had no lawful basis for collecting and using the personal information of hundreds of thousands of UK children.
A critical component of the ICO’s enforcement action was Reddit’s failure to carry out a Data Protection Impact Assessment (DPIA) before January 2025. Under UK law, companies must assess and mitigate risks to children before launching services likely to be accessed by them.
The ICO noted that children under 13 were essentially “hidden in plain sight” on the platform, having their data used in ways they could not understand or control.
While Reddit introduced new age assurance measures in July 2025, including age verification for mature content, the regulator remains critical of the platform’s continued reliance on self-declaration for new accounts. The ICO warned that simply asking a user to type in their age is a method that is “easy to bypass” and does not meet the standard of protection required for high-risk platforms.
“It’s concerning that a company the size of Reddit failed in its legal duty to protect the personal information of UK children,” said John Edwards, UK Information Commissioner. “Companies have a responsibility to ensure children are not exposed to risks through the way their data is used. To do this, they need to be confident they know the age of their users.”
The record fine follows a similar penalty recently issued to MediaLab and is part of a broader crackdown on social media and video-sharing sites. The ICO confirmed it will continue to monitor Reddit’s updated controls and encouraged the wider tech industry to shift away from “self-declaration” models in favour of more robust, effective age assurance technology.
An iPhone safety feature is drawing renewed attention after six skiers were rescued during California’s deadliest recorded avalanche, with survivors using satellite messaging to stay in contact with emergency responders when traditional cell service failed.
The skiers were able to communicate with authorities using Apple’s Emergency SOS via satellite feature when they found themselves outside cellular and Wi-Fi coverage.
Remote Areas
Apple introduced Emergency SOS via satellite with the iPhone 14 lineup. The feature is available on supported models running iOS 16.1 or later and is designed for use in remote areas where cellular signals are not accessible.
The satellite tool, available on newer iPhone models, allows users to text emergency services directly when traditional networks are unavailable. As interest in the feature grows, Apple users have been discussing how it works—and whether it should remain free.
In the Lake Tahoe rescue, communication between the stranded group and emergency personnel proved critical.
Rescuers ultimately found the group roughly 11 hours after the avalanche began, according to reports from Inc.
Nevada County Sheriff Shannan Moon described the strength of the slide, saying: “A two would bury a person. A three would bury a house and it’s right in the middle of those two.”
‘Life saving’
Reddit contributors reacting to the story said the feature justified the cost of newer iPhones.
“This is probably the best feature the iPhone has ever added, possibly only behind fall detection in Apple Watches,” a fan declared on Reddit.
Another agreed that, “This is the kind of feature that justifies the premium. Most people will never need it, but for the ones who do, it’s literally life-saving.”
Some critics, however, raised concerns about reports that the feature may not remain free indefinitely.
“The only worry is that it’s still planned to be a paid feature… which I think is completely wrong,” one remarked.
Apple advises users to first attempt calling 911 or local emergency services, even if their regular carrier shows no service.
If the call fails, iPhones will display an option to use Emergency Text via Satellite. Users can tap “Report Emergency” and follow on-screen prompts while keeping the phone held naturally with a clear line of sight to the sky.
Once connected, the iPhone shares critical information with responders, including the user’s location, elevation, Medical ID (if set up), emergency contacts, responses to an emergency questionnaire and the device’s battery level.
Risks Posed
Apple also recommends trying the built-in demo under Settings > Emergency SOS before traveling to remote areas. The demo does not contact emergency services, but walks users through the satellite connection process.
Emergency SOS via satellite is not available in all countries and regions and works only on supported models.
As extreme weather and backcountry travel continue to pose risks, the Lake Tahoe rescue has prompted renewed attention on how smartphones can function as a lifeline when traditional networks fail.
Newsweek has reached out to Apple for comment via email.
To read how Newsweek uses AI as a newsroom tool, click here.
Reddit, Meta, and Google voluntarily “complied with some of the requests” for identifying details of users critical of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) sent as part of a recent wave of administrative subpoenas the Department of Homeland Security has been distributing to Big Tech the past few months, according to an anonymously sourced New York Times report.
Those three companies, plus Discord, have received “hundreds” of such requests that have come from DHS recently. Meta, it should be noted, is the parent company of Instagram, Facebook, and WhatsApp.
Administrative subpoenas used for this purpose represent an escalation. This tool, which comes not from a judge but from DHS itself, was formerly reserved for situations like child abductions, according to the Times.
The users were targeted because their posts “criticized ICE or pointed to the locations of ICE agents,” the Times says.
A Google spokesperson replied to the Times with a statement, saying “When we receive a subpoena, our review process is designed to protect user privacy while meeting our legal obligations,” and “We inform users when their accounts have been subpoenaed, unless under legal order not to or in an exceptional circumstance. We review every legal demand and push back against those that are overbroad.”
Gizmodo requested comment from Meta, Discord, and Reddit. We will update if we hear back.
According to the Times, one or multiple of the relevant companies have stated that they notify users of these requests from DHS, and give them a 14-day window to “fight the subpoena in court” before complying.
Amazon has also been accused of at least some degree of participation with ICE’s ongoing mass deportation efforts. In October, Amazon-owned Ring announced a partnership with Flock that would loop the AI-powered network into the content coming from users’ doorbell cameras. According to a 404 Media investigation, that network feeds information to law enforcement agencies at the local and federal levels, allowing for reasonable concern that ICE has access to all that footage.
Protesters have launched an effort called “Resist and Unsubscribe” targeting ten tech companies they perceive as exceptionally supportive of ICE. That list includes Meta, Google, and Amazon, but not Reddit.
Reddit suggested on Thursday that its AI-powered search engine could be the next big opportunity for its business — not just in terms of product, but also as a revenue driver impacting its bottom line. During the company’s fourth-quarter earnings call on Thursday, it offered an update on its plans to merge traditional and AI search together and hinted that although search is not yet monetized, “it’s an enormous market and opportunity.”
In particular, the company believes that generative AI search will be “better for most queries.”
“There’s a type of query we’re, I think, particularly good at — I would argue, the best on the internet — which is questions that have no answers, where the answer actually is multiple perspectives from lots of people,” said Reddit CEO Steve Huffman.
Traditional search, meanwhile, is more like navigation — it’s a way to find the right link to a topic or subreddit. But LLMs can be good at this, too, if not better, he said. “So that’s the direction we’re going.”
The exec also noted that weekly active users for search over the past year grew 30% from 60 million users to 80 million users. Meanwhile, the weekly active users for the AI-powered Reddit Answers grew from 1 million in the first quarter of 2025 to 15 million by the fourth quarter.
“We’re seeing a lot of growth there, and I think there’s a lot of potential too,” Huffman added.
Reddit said it’s working to modernize the AI answers interface by making its responses more media-rich, and pilots of this are already underway.
The company is also thinking about how it can position itself when it’s not just a social site, but a place people come for answers. Reddit told investors on the call that it’s doing away with the distinction between logged-in and logged-out users starting in Q3 2026, as it will aim to personalize the site — using AI and machine learning — and make it relevant to whoever shows up.
The company announced in 2025 it was planning to combine its AI search feature, Reddit Answers, with its traditional search engine to improve the experience for end users. In the fourth quarter, Reddit said it had made “significant progress” in unifying its core search and its AI feature. It also released five new languages on Reddit Answers and is piloting dynamic agents along with search results that include “media beyond text.”
Though Reddit sees value in its AI answers, it’s not been keeping that to itself. The company’s content licensing business, which allows other companies to train their AI models on its data, is growing, too. That business revenue is reported as part of Reddit’s “other” revenues (i.e., its non-ad revenue). This “other” revenue increased by 8% year-over-year to reach $36 million in Q4 and was up 22% to reach $140 million for 2025.
Apple is rolling out a new privacy control in its next iPhone and iPad software update that limits how precisely cellular networks can track a user’s location.
The feature, called Limit Precise Location, arrives with iOS and iPadOS 26.3 and reduces the accuracy of location data that mobile carriers can infer from cell tower connections.
Instead of pinpointing a device’s exact position, supported networks will only be able to determine a broader area, such as a neighborhood.
The update is expected to be Apple’s first major iPhone software release of 2026, with a public rollout likely in late January, according to The Mac Observer.
Why It Matters
Cellular carriers routinely collect location data as part of normal network operations, but that information has also been misused in the past.
In 2024, U.S. regulators fined major wireless carriers nearly $200 million over improper handling and sharing of customer location data.
By limiting the precision of carrier-level location data, Apple is closing a lesser-known privacy gap that exists outside of app-based location permissions, which users can already manage through iOS settings.
What To Know
Apple says the new setting affects only the information available to cellular networks and does not interfere with normal device use.
“The limit precise location setting doesn’t impact the precision of the location data that is shared with emergency responders during an emergency call,” Apple said in a support post.
The company added that it also does not affect app-based location sharing through services such as Find My.
According to Apple’s support documentation, the feature is available on iPhone Air, iPhone 16e and iPad Pro (M5) Wi-Fi + Cellular models running iOS or iPadOS 26.3 or later, and only on supported carriers.
To enable it:
Open Settings
Tap Cellular
Select Cellular Data Options
Scroll to Limit Precise Location and toggle it on.
Users may be prompted to restart their device.
As of now, supported carriers include Boost Mobile in the U.S., Telekom in Germany, EE and BT in the U.K., and AIS and True in Thailand, Apple says.
What People Are Saying
Commenters on Reddit’s r/apple forum praised Apple’s commitment to security, although there were some skeptics.
“A feature meant to actually benefit the privacy of users?” one commenter wrote. “Tides must be shifting. Something’s gonna happen soon. I wonder why Apple wants to be in our good graces again.”
“Apple is that one company that has been making privacy its selling feature for more than a decade,” another user pointed out. “It’s also why its AI implementations sucked so badly….it just didn’t have enough user data.”
“It’s always been more privacy-focused than other big tech companies, so this isn’t really anything new,” a third individual agreed.
“It tried to get into the user data and ads business, but it didn’t work out for it. Now it focuses on privacy as its schtick.”
What’s Next
Apple has begun testing iOS 26.3 in beta, with a full public release expected by the end of January if the company follows its usual update schedule.
Newsweek has reached out to Apple for comment via email.
To read how Newsweek uses AI as a newsroom tool, click here.
Yorgos Lanthimos‘ Bugonia is a remake of Save the Green Planet!, though in many ways it’s far less out there than the 2003 South Korean original. And while the basic premise—a conspiracy theorist kidnaps a powerful executive he believes to be an alien planning to destroy Earth—is the same in both films, the nuances of what a conspiracy theorist looks and acts like have been tweaked to serve an America, circa 2025, version of that story.
In a new interview with Deadline, Bugonia screenwriter Will Tracy keyed in on the character of Teddy, played with just the right jittery, damaged yet determined energy by Jesse Plemons. Some of his most helpful research came from simply visiting websites that Teddy himself might bookmark and return to.
“I did spend a little bit of time on [Reddit], and maybe not even for research for the film. [Because of] my own weird search for knowledge and answers or something, or some confusion, or maybe a need to understand what people are saying, to feel connected to something … I kind of find myself dipping into those quarters anyway, as an observer,” Tracy said. “So I did quite a bit of that of Reddit and YouTube comments, and even a bit of 4Chan, which was quite hot at the time, but to a certain extent, I didn’t want to make Teddy into kind of a composite of those, whatever the disorders du jour were, I wanted to make a guy who felt like he had his own thing. Even ‘incel,’ which feels culturally valid to call him that in some ways, well, he’s literally not, he’s voluntarily celibate. He’s quite purposeful in that sense.”
He continued. “I think the other thing I probably had in my head was, and this has been definitely reinforced since with a few recent events, but whenever there’s a thing like this, whether it’s a domestic terrorist or a shooter of some kind, or an assassin, or whatever it is, there’s now, of course, that immediate cultural reaction to sort of assign blame to the other side for that, like, ‘That’s one of theirs,’ or, ‘That’s clearly a right-wing nut job,’ or, ‘That’s a leftist loon.’ And then, of course, we watch what happens. Inevitably, the cliche, it seems to always happen, is that the information comes in and it’s, ‘They’re an anti-fascist registered Republican gun-lover who identifies as non-binary.’ It corresponds to no clear category at all.”
“And so that was kind of in my head too, that this is someone who maybe cycled through a bunch of different things and didn’t find a story that appealed to them, and so they had to create their own.”
Of course, in Teddy’s case, his wild ideas are actually correct. Emma Stone’s character, Michelle, is eventually revealed to be an alien. Trying to decide whether or not Teddy is dangerously unstable—or if Michelle is indeed plotting the planet’s demise—is a great part of the movie’s fun. The fact that Teddy feels so alarmingly accurate only enhances that mystery, especially when you find out the truth in the end.
BROOFMEILD, Colo. — A plane landed safely at Rocky Mountain Metropolitan Airport (RMMA) in Broomfield over the weekend using automated technology after the pilot was incapacitated minutes into the flight, the first time such technology has been used in a real-world emergency situation.
The Beechcraft Super King Air 200, operated by Buffalo River Aircraft Services and equipped with Garmin’s Autoland system, left Aspen-Pitkin airport at 1:43 p.m. Saturday and landed safely a little over 30 minutes later at RMMA without incident, according to FlightAware.
“Garmin can confirm that an emergency Autoland activation occurred at Rocky Mountain Metropolitan Airport in Broomfield, Colorado. The Autoland took place on Sat., Dec. 20, resulting in a successful landing,” said Garmin International spokeswoman Mikayla Rudolph, adding this was the first activation and landing of Garmin’s Autoland system.
Per the company’s website, the Garmin Autoland system “takes complete control of the flight to land the airplane in an emergency where the pilot is unable to fly” finding an optimal airport for landing, while considering runway length, distance and fuel range, among other factors.
Though it was not clear how the pilot was incapacitated, air traffic audio obtained by Denver7 can be heard communicating that there was “pilot incapacitation” and relaying how many miles out to the airport the plane was and which runway it intended to use to land safely.
In a statement, Sydny Boyd, a spokeswoman for RMMA, said they were aware of the situation and had nothing to report as the plan landed safely without incident.
The flight was able to resume its path Sunday morning and landed in Oklahoma City at 12:24 p.m. CST.
Coloradans making a difference | Denver7 featured videos
Denver7 is committed to making a difference in our community by standing up for what’s right, listening, lending a helping hand and following through on promises. See that work in action, in the videos above.
Social media platform Reddit on Friday launched a legal challenge against Australia’s social media ban for under 16s.
Under the law, which took effect on Wednesday, people under the age of 16 are no longer allowed to have their own accounts on 10 major social media platforms including Reddit, Instagram, TikTok, Snapchat, Facebook and YouTube.
In a High Court filing, Reddit argued the ban infringed on free political speech and posed privacy risks.
In a post on the platform, Reddit said it took youth safety online seriously and the court action was not an attempt to avoid compliance.
“That said, we believe there are more effective ways for the Australian government to accomplish our shared goal of protecting youth.”
The new law had “the unfortunate effect of forcing intrusive and potentially insecure verification processes on adults as well as minors,” the company said.
It would isolate teens from being able to engage in age-appropriate community experiences and create “an illogical patchwork of which platforms are included and which aren’t,” Reddit added.
The law was applied to Reddit inaccurately, the company said.
“Unlike other platforms included under this law, the vast majority of Redditors are adults, we don’t market or target advertising to children under 18, and had an age rating of ’17+’ in the Apple App Store prior to the law.”
Reddit said there were more targeted, “privacy-preserving measures” to protect young people online without resorting to blanket bans.
Australia’s Health Minister Mark Butler accused Reddit of putting profit over safety.
“Across our history, when our governments have taken strong action to protect citizens against highly addictive, highly damaging products, they’ve usually been challenged in the courts by the companies that profit most from them,” he said.
“But the idea that this is some action by Reddit to protect the political freedoms of young people is a complete crock.”
The government would “fight this action every step of the way,” Butler said.
“It’s action we saw time and time again by Big Tobacco against tobacco control, and we’re seeing it now by some social media or big tech giants taken against these world leading social media reforms that are going to do so much to improve the social skills, the learning skills, and, importantly, the mental health of young Australians.”
Butler said other governments and communities around the world were watching Australia as the first country in the world to impose such a ban.
“They want it to be a success, and if it is a success, I’m very confident they’ll follow seat and take the same sorts of actions to protect their young citizens as well.”
The regulation, passed with the support of almost all major parties in parliament at the end of 2024, aims to protect young people from risks such as cyberbullying, problematic consumption and distressing content.
Affected companies were given a year to introduce age verification measures, and violations will result in hefty fines of up to $49.5 million Australian ($33 million).
Messaging services such as WhatsApp, email, online games and educational offerings are exempt.
Numerous teenagers reported that their accounts were still active after the law came into force, or that they had managed to circumvent the regulation on its first day.
With the world’s first social media ban for teenagers under 16 now in effect in Australia, its initial political architect is celebrating a new less-digital era for millions of children — and sharing that the legislation was personally inspired by his wife, for their four children.
“She read a book called ‘The Anxious Generation,’ by Jonathan Haidt,” said Peter Malinauskas, the premier of the state of South Australia. “And I will never forget the night she finished reading the book and she put it down on her lap and she turned to me and said, ‘You better do something about this!’”
Within seven months, and with strong public support, that idea fast became law across the land, winning support from Prime Minister Anthony Albanese. Ten major apps including TikTok, Instagram, Snapchat, Reddit and Facebook have complied to bar everyone 16 and under from their accounts and from setting up new accounts.
“Heaven forbid they might talk to one another a bit more, pick up the phone and have a chat rather than just being obsessed with the screen,” said Maulinauskas.
The ban puts the onus of responsibility on social media companies rather than parents with a penalty of up to $33 million if found to be in breach. It allows for each company to decide how best to adhere, which must be “multi-layered,” using more than one kind of identity verification, which could include traditional methods including national IDs and passports but also artificial intelligence — controversial over possible inaccuracies — to scan facial features for age.
Malinauskas readily admits there will be growing pains.
“People will find ways around it and lots of things will go wrong, and that’ll be highlighted in coming days and weeks in Australia,” he said, “but on balance, this is a reform that parents want so they can do their job more easily.”
He says officials from North America, Europe and Asia have been speaking with him about advancing similar legislation in Canada, the United Kingdom and Japan. Malaysia is already on track to be the next country to ban those under 16 from social media in 2026.
Yet in Australia, the law already faces a legal challenge. The country’s High Court accepted a legal challenge from two 15-year-olds who assert the ban violates their freedom of communication. The case could be heard as early as February.
Malinauskas blames those companies for putting all children through “a global experiment” over the past decade with “social media addiction and overuse because many of these platforms have had addictive algorithms.”
“I’m really proud, really proud that we’ve been able to see South Australia and then Australia lead a reform that’s going to make a big difference to young people’s lives,” he said.
“And the reason why politicians are looking at it is because parents know something’s not right. You know, there is no better judge of what’s in the best interest of a child than a parent, right?”
BROOKLINE, Mass. (AP) — For the past several years, 75-year-old Miguel Laboy has smoked a joint with his coffee every morning. He tells himself he won’t start tomorrow the same way, but he usually does.
“You know what bothers me? To have cannabis on my mind the first thing in the morning,” he said, sparking a blunt in his Brookline, Massachusetts, apartment. “I’d like to get up one day and not smoke. But you see how that’s going.”
Since legalization and commercialization, daily cannabis use has become a defining — and often invisible — part of many people’s lives. High-potency vapes and concentrates now dominate the market, and doctors say they can blur the line between relief and dependence over time so that users don’t notice the shift. Across the country, people who turned to cannabis for help are finding it harder to put down.
Overall, alcohol remains more widely used than cannabis. But starting in 2022, the number of daily cannabis users in the U.S. surpassed that of daily drinkers — a major shift in American habits.
Researchers say the rise has unfolded alongside products that contain far more THC than the marijuana of past decades, including vape oils and concentrates that can reach 80% to 95% THC. Massachusetts, like most states, sets no limit on how strong these products can be.
Doctors warn that daily, high-potency use can cloud memory, disturb sleep, intensify anxiety or depression and trigger addiction in ways earlier generations didn’t encounter. Many who develop cannabis use disorder say it’s hard to recognize the signs because of the widespread belief that marijuana isn’t addictive. Because the consequences tend to creep in gradually — brain fog, irritability, dependence — users often miss when therapeutic use shifts into compulsion.
How a habit becomes an addiction
Miguel Laboy smokes a joint on Oct. 3, 2025, in Brookline, Mass. (AP Photo/Robert F. Bukaty)
Miguel Laboy smokes a joint on Oct. 3, 2025, in Brookline, Mass. (AP Photo/Robert F. Bukaty)
Laboy, a retired chef, began seeing a substance-use counselor after telling his doctor he felt depressed, unmotivated and increasingly isolated as his drinking and cannabis use escalated.
Stay up to date with the news and the best of AP by following our WhatsApp channel.
Naltrexone helped him quit alcohol, but he hasn’t found a way to quit marijuana. Unlike alcohol and opioids, there is no FDA-approved medication to treat cannabis addiction, though research is underway.
Laboy, who first smoked at 18, said marijuana has long soothed symptoms tied to undiagnosed ADHD, childhood trauma and painful experiences — including cancer treatment and his son’s death. Through decades in restaurant kitchens, he considered himself a “functional pothead.”
Lately, though, his use has become compulsive. After retiring, he began vaping 85% THC cartridges.
Miguel Laboy, a daily cannabis user, vapes, Friday, Oct. 3, 2025, in Brookline, Mass. (AP Photo/Robert F. Bukaty)
Miguel Laboy, a daily cannabis user, vapes, Friday, Oct. 3, 2025, in Brookline, Mass. (AP Photo/Robert F. Bukaty)
“These days, I carry two things in my hands: my vape and my cellular — that’s it,” he said. “I’m not proud of it, but it’s the reality.”
Cannabis eases his anxiety and “settles his spirit,” but he’s noticed it affects his concentration. He hopes to learn to read music, but sustaining focus at the piano has grown difficult.
He’s seen an addiction psychiatrist for six months, but he hasn’t been able to cut back. The medical system doesn’t seem equipped to help, he said.
“They’re not ready yet,” Laboy said. “I go to them for help, but all they say is, ‘Try to smoke less.’ I already know that — that’s why I’m there.”
Younger users describe a similar slide — one that begins with relief and ends somewhere harder to define.
Brain fog becomes ‘your new normal’
Kyle, a college student, smokes cannabis out of a bong, Oct. 29, 2025, in Boston. (AP Photo/Robert F. Bukaty)
Kyle, a college student, smokes cannabis out of a bong, Oct. 29, 2025, in Boston. (AP Photo/Robert F. Bukaty)
Kyle, a 20-year-old Boston University student, says cannabis helps him manage panic attacks he’s had since high school. He spoke on the condition that only his first name be used because he buys cannabis illegally.
In the Allston apartment he shares with fraternity brothers, they have a communal bong.
When he’s high, Kyle feels calm — and able to process anxious thoughts and feel a sense of gratitude. But that clarity has become harder to reach when he’s sober.
“I think I was able to do that better a year ago,” he said. “Now I can only do it when I’m high, which is scary.”
He said the brain fog and feeling of detachment develop so gradually they become “your new normal.” Some mornings, he wakes up feeling like an observer in his own life, struggling to recall the day before. “It can be tough to wake up and go, ‘Oh my God, who am I?’” he said.
Still, he doesn’t plan to stop anytime soon.
Kyle says cannabis helps him function — more than seeking professional treatment would. Doctors say that ambivalence is common: many people feel cannabis is both the problem and the solution.
A dream turns into a nightmare
This April 22, 2016, file photo shows a marijuana bud at a medical marijuana facility in Unity, Maine. (AP Photo/Robert F. Bukaty, File)
Anne Hassel spent a month in jail and a year on probation for growing cannabis in the 1980s. She cried when Massachusetts’ first dispensaries opened — and left her physical therapy career to get a job at one.
Within a year, though, “my dream job turned into a nightmare,” she said.
Hassel, 58, said some consultants pushed staff to promote high-potency concentrates as “more medicinal,” downplaying their risks. After trying her first dab — a nearly instantaneous, “stupefying” high — she began using 90% THC concentrate several times a day.
Her use quickly became debilitating, she said. She lost interest in things she once loved, like mountain biking. One autumn day, she drove to the woods and turned back without getting out. “I just wanted to go to my friend’s house and dab,” she said. “I hated myself.”
Anne Hassel, a former cannabis user, rides her motorcycle, Nov. 6, 2025, in Chicopee, Mass. (AP Photo/Robert F. Bukaty)
Anne Hassel, a former cannabis user, rides her motorcycle, Nov. 6, 2025, in Chicopee, Mass. (AP Photo/Robert F. Bukaty)
She didn’t seek formal treatment but recovered with the help of a friend. Riding her green motorcycle — once named “Sativa” after her favorite strain — has helped her reconnect to her body and spirit.
“People don’t want to acknowledge what’s going on because legalization was tied to social justice,” she said. “You get swept up in it and don’t recognize the harm until it’s too late.”
Community for those who want to leave
Online, that realization unfolds daily on r/leaves, a Reddit community of more than 380,000 people trying to cut back or quit.
Users describe a similar push-pull — craving the calm cannabis brings, then feeling trapped by the fog. Some write about isolation and regret, saying years of smoking dulled their ambition and presence in relationships. Others post pleas for help from work or doctors’ offices.
SLIDESHOW: The every day high
An advertisement for a cannabis delivery company is seen on a public trash bin, Sunday, Nov. 16, 2025, in Boston. (AP Photo/Robert F. Bukaty)
Miguel Laboy shops at a cannabis dispensary, Friday, Nov. 14, 2025, in Brookline, Mass. (AP Photo/Robert F. Bukaty)
A customer holds a package containing one gram of cannabis purchased from a dispensary, Friday, Nov. 14, 2025, in Brookline, Mass. (AP Photo/Robert F. Bukaty)
A package of fruit-flavored cannabis gummies is displayed at a dispensary, Friday, Nov. 14, 2025, in Brookline, Mass. (AP Photo/Robert F. Bukaty)
A gram of cannabis is seen, Friday, Nov. 14, 2025, in Brookline, Mass. (AP Photo/Robert F. Bukaty)
Miguel Laboy plays the keyboard after smoking cannabis, Friday, Oct. 3, 2025, in Brookline, Mass. (AP Photo/Robert F. Bukaty)
Together, they paint a portrait of dependence that is quiet and routine — and difficult to escape.
“When people talk about legalizing a drug, they’re really talking about commercializing it,” said Dave Bushnell, who founded the Reddit group. “We’ve built an industry optimized to sell as much as possible.”
What doctors want people to know
Dr. Jordan Tishler, a former emergency physician who now treats medical cannabis patients in Massachusetts, said low doses of THC paired with high doses of CBD can help some patients with anxiety. Many products have high levels of THC, which can worsen symptoms, he said.
“It’s a medicine,” he said. “It can be useful, but it can also be dangerous — and access without guidance is dangerous.”
Miguel Laboy rolls a joint Friday, Nov. 14, 2025, in Brookline, Mass. (AP Photo/Robert F. Bukaty)
Miguel Laboy rolls a joint Friday, Nov. 14, 2025, in Brookline, Mass. (AP Photo/Robert F. Bukaty)
Dr. Kevin Hill, an addiction director at Boston’s Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center who specializes in cannabis use disorder, said the biggest gap is education, among both consumers and clinicians.
“I think adults should be allowed to do what they want as long as it doesn’t hurt anybody else,” but many users don’t understand the risks, Hill said.
He said the conversation shouldn’t be about prohibition but about balance and informed decision-making. “For most people, the risks outweigh the benefits.”
After losing her two cats within months, a woman from New York wasn’t ready to welcome a new pet in her life—until a tabby showed up to her door and forced her to adopt him.
In a viralRedditpost shared on Tuesday under the username u/danooli, she shares pictures of the feline making himself comfortable in her home, trying all the furniture and window sills, acting like he has been living with her all his life.
“I wasn’t ready for a new cat after we lost one in June ’24 and another this past March. This tabby decided we were ready when he marched in and made himself at home,” the woman says in the caption.
“We’ve named him Albert after the character from Little House on the Prairie. The vet cleared him healthwise and did not find a chip so he’s staying I guess.”
The poster, Dani, told Newsweek that, one morning, she was in her backyard, feeding the feral cat who has been visiting her and her husband for over a year, when she suddenly noticed another feline watching from his hiding place on a cypress tree.
“I made the pss-pss-pss noise and got their attention and I was meowed at in return. It was a feeble, small mew, more than a full-throated meow, so I made up a bowl of food for them as well. When I brought it over, I saw he was a boy, and I was even allowed to briefly pet his head. The other cat—we call her Miss Cici—would never allow us to pet her, so I felt special.
“That evening, as I was bringing dinner for Miss Cici, this new cat was also waiting. After he ate, he found a catnip plant we have in our yard, and he went bonkers on it. Seeing how happy he was, my husband brought out a long nylon string to see if we could entice him to play. Immediately, he showed interest and played for a while.”
Then, when the family opened the door to their home, the boy cat—now Albert—immediately ran inside and sat down in the kitchen, refusing to leave the house.
“My husband is actually allergic to cats, so we weren’t planning on allowing him to stay, but he really didn’t want to leave. So we opened the flap to the cat door we had installed years earlier for our departed cats—who were both Siberian forest cats, which are hypoallergenic—so he could leave when he felt like it, but he ended up falling asleep under a table so we left him and let him stay.”
In the following days, the cat kept coming and going through the flap, and once the family realized he was there to stay, they took him to the veterinarian to check for a microchip and for a checkup. Now he is an official member of the household.
“Miss Cici and Albert get along very well, and she seems a lot more open to us after we brought him in, so we are hoping she will eventually allow us to love her properly soon!” the poster added.
Loading reddit content…
The post quickly went viral on social media and has so far received over 12,000 upvotes and 213 comments on the platform.
One user, Wendigos_and_witches, commented: “As someone that felt this same way when I lost my familiar … Albert understood the assignment! I just imagine your two going through a CDS catalog. ”Yup! He’s the one. Send him in!’”
Illustrious_Lion7671 said: “Who can blame Albert? He found an excellent home with a comfy sofa, warm lap and premium entertainment (live squirrel TV)!”
EnleeJones wrote: “I love how cats will just waltz into a house and be like ‘I live here now’ and we go ‘Okay.”
Do you have funny and adorable videos or pictures of your pet you want to share? Send them to life@newsweek.com with some details about your best friend, and they could appear in our Pet of the Week lineup.
Reddit won’t escape Australia’s child social media ban. The Guardianreports that Communications Minister Anika Wells announced Reddit’s addition on Wednesday. The nation’s law, which blocks children under 16 from major social media sites, is scheduled to go into effect on December 10.
Alongside Reddit, Wells said Australian streaming site Kick would also be included. They join the previously announced Facebook, X, Snapchat, TikTok, YouTube and Instagram. Australia considers the list to be a starting point for the ban and won’t rule out adding more. Other companies under consideration are Discord, Twitch, GitHub and Roblox.
The ban passed in late 2024. The legislation puts the onus on the platforms, rather than parents, to police underage use. Companies that don’t take reasonable steps to prevent under-16 users from accessing their platforms can face penalties of up to AU$49.5 million (around $32 million).
“There’s a time and place for social media in Australia, but there’s not a place for predatory algorithms, harmful content and toxic popularity [meters] manipulating Australian children,” Wells said. “Online platforms can target children with chilling control. We are mandating they use that sophisticated technology to protect them.”
Reddit CEO Steve Huffman says Reddit’s next chapter is about making the platform “a true search destination” built on authentic human conversation. Getty Images
Reddit is thriving in the A.I. era, even as fast, synthetic content floods nearly every corner of the internet. The community-driven discussion site is the third most visited website in the U.S., behind Google and YouTube (and ahead of Amazon and Facebook), the company said yesterday (Oct. 30) on its third-quarter earnings call, citing Semrush’s October 2025 data. Reddit’s leaders said they’re doubling down on the platform’s identity as “for humans, by humans,” even as they use A.I. to help spark more authentic conversations.
Between July and September, Reddit brought in $585 million in revenue, up 68 percent from the same period last year. Net income surged more than fivefold year-over-year to $163 million. The site had 116 million daily active users at the end of September.
“As Google and other search engines grapple with issues of trust and authenticity, Reddit possesses what most A.I. companies are after: authenticated, nuanced, community-driven content,” Baruch Labunski, CEO at digital marketing company Rank Secure, told Observer.
Co-founder and CEO Steve Huffman told analysts yesterday Reddit is doubling down on making the platform “a true search destination.”
To that end, the company announced it’s “redesigning the Reddit experience,” focusing on a modern interface with advanced search capabilities. It will continue to roll out its generative A.I. tool, Reddit Answers, and new A.I. features will help users interpret rules unique to each subreddit and bring post insights to the top.
Reddit said 75 million users utilized Reddit’s search functionalities each week in the third quarter, with that number expected to grow. “Reddit Answers provides users with curated, community-powered insights that are often more helpful than traditional web results,” Huffman said. “Our aim is to have a single, great search experience.”
“Smart move toward a more ‘search-forward’ experience, but it’s still a tightrope walk,” Labunski said. “The winning strategy is to enable Reddit’s self-discovery and IP moderation with A.I., while leaving the chaotic human interactions intact.”
Reddit continues to incorporate more A.I., specifically in moderation, translation, video and interactive features. Reddit has launched A.I.-supported moderator tools in more than 3,000 communities, with a broader rollout on the horizon. For example, moderators can use A.I. to view a summary of a user’s profile. “We’re using A.I. to make it easier for those user-written rules or moderator-written rules to be enforced automatically to make moderation more fun and efficient,” Huffman added.
Meanwhile, Reddit’s A.I. translation now handles 30 languages, and the company is planning to expand this to drive more international growth.
The platform recently hosted its first video AMA (ask me anything) with NASA and plans to continue expanding video in its more than 100,000 subreddit communities. Video comment replies are also expanding.
Reddit’s advertising platform continues to see updates, and the team is currently developing interactive ads. Huffman said ads remain their “core business” and they’re continuing to roll out their machine-learning-enabled dynamic product ads, which use user intent data to inform who to show ads to.
Reddit’s hyper-focus on search and A.I. proves the company has moved well beyond a forum site. This is “Reddit telling the market it wants to be the place where human context gets found and not just the place LLMs crawl,” Martin Jeffrey, founder of digital marketing agency Harton Works, told Observer.
On Wednesday, Reddit filed a lawsuit against AI company Perplexity and three other companies alleging the AI company illegally scraped Reddit data through the use of data scraping companies based in Europe and Texas.
“AI companies are locked in an arms race for quality human content—and that pressure has fueled an industrial-scale ‘data laundering’ economy,” said Ben Lee, Reddit’s Chief Legal Officer, in a statement to Inc and other publications. “Reddit is a prime target because it’s one of the largest and most dynamic collections of human conversation ever created.”
Reddit accused three data scraping companies Oxylabs UAB, AWM Proxy, and SerpApi of illegally scraping Reddit data and that Perplexity is a “willing customer of at least one of its co-defendants.” The lawsuit also accused Perplexity of operating “akin to a “North Korean hacker.” It also alleged that AWM Proxy was a “former Russian botnet.”
Perplexity responded to Reddit’s lawsuit with a Reddit post on Wednesday night. In the post, Perplexity denied the allegations and said the suit was “a show of force in Reddit’s training data negotiations with Google and OpenAI.” Reddit is currently renegotiating licensing deals with Google and OpenAI, and exploring a dynamic pricing model for licensing its content. OpenAI CEO Sam Altman owns an 8.7% stake in Reddit.
An Inc.com Featured Presentation
Perplexity also said that the company cannot sign a content licensing agreement because they “don’t train their AI models on content” and that it is already “lawfully accessing Reddit data.”
“We strongly disagree with Reddit’s allegations and intend to vigorously defend ourselves in court,” says Alex Barron, a spokesperson for SerpApi. “SerpApi stands firmly behind its business model and conduct.”
Denas Grybauskas, Oxylabs’ Chief Governance and Strategy Officer, says Reddit made no attempt to contact them before the lawsuit was filed. “Oxylabs’ position is that no company should claim ownership of public data that does not belong to them,” Grybauskas says. “It is possible that it is just an attempt to sell the same public data at an inflated price.”
AWM Proxy could not be reached for comment.
In June, Reddit sued Anthropic, another major AI company, over allegations that Anthropic stole data from Reddit to train its AI model.
After following a woman at the park for over a week, a stray cat finally managed to get her to adopt him—now he has a warm home and a mom who loves him.
In a viralRedditpost shared on Saturday under the username u/Evanessa_r the poster says that the tabby tuxedo stalked her on her evening walks for over a week trying to befriend her. “I often go for walks in the park in the evenings, and this stray cat started coming to me every day at exactly 8 p.m.” she wrote in the caption.
“Our friendship lasted for over a week until one evening the weather was bad and raining, but I decided to go check on my friend anyway, and this sweet little bundle of joy was sitting all wet under the bench, waiting for me.
“From that day on, she became family. As Dominic Toretto said, ‘I don’t have friends, I got family,’” she added.
Loading reddit content…
The post also features some pictures of the poster holding the kitty while sitting on a bench in the park, with the feline leaning his head on her chest, as if he knows that he is safe around her.
“The journey of a stray cat who came to me in the park and walked with me for over a week to a domestic cat surrounded by love,” the poster said.
We all know that it is cats who choose their owners, and not the other way around. But what makes felines pick one person over another?
Experts say that cats choose their favorite human based on who invests the most effort in understanding and communicating with them.
According to Union Lake Veterinary Hospital, felines prefer those who pay attention to their cues, motives, and needs.
Their choice is also influenced by personality and breed. Calm cats often favor quiet people, while energetic ones usually seek playful companions.
Building a stronger bond with your feline involves time, attention, and communication. Spending time together, matching their interests, talking to them, and offering regular affection through petting or play helps strengthen the relationship.
The video quickly went viral on social media and has so far received over 9,000 upvotes and 143 comments on the platform.
One user, Minsc_NBoo, commented: “I think I’ve got something in my eye. She was so desperate to find her person, and now she has a forever home. The last picture really shows pure love in her eyes.”
Cabitaa posted: “The fact that she was waiting for you in the rain. You guys are so lucky you found each other!”
Xtunamilk added: “Poor little thing looks like a lost or abandoned pet and must’ve been so cold and lonely out there. I’m glad you found each other and you took the little one in!”
Newsweek reached out to u/Evanessa_r for comment via Reddit. We could not verify the details of the case.
Do you have funny and adorable videos or pictures of your pet you want to share? Send them to life@newsweek.com with some details about your best friend, and they could appear in our Pet of the Week lineup.
Reddit is suing companies SerApi, OxyLabs, AWMProxy and Perplexity for allegedly scraping its data from search results and using it without a license, The New York Times reports. The new lawsuit follows legal action against AI startup Anthropic, who allegedly used Reddit content to train its Claude chatbot.
As of 2023, Reddit charges companies looking access to posts and other content in the hopes of making money on data that could be used for AI training. The company has also signed licensing deals with companies like Google and OpenAI, and even built an AI answer machine of its own to leverage the knowledge in users’ posts. Scraping search results for Reddit content avoids those payments, which is why the company is seeking financial damages and a permanent injunction that prevents companies from selling previously scraped Reddit material.
Some of the companies Reddit is focused on, like SerApi, OxyLabs and AWMProxy, are not exactly household names, but they’ve all made collecting data from search results and selling it a key part of their business. Perplexity’s inclusion in the lawsuit might be more obvious. The AI company needs data to train its models, and has already been caught seemingly copying and regurgitating material it hasn’t paid to license. That also includes reportedly ignoring the robots.txt protocol, a way for websites to communicate that they don’t want their material scraped.
Per a copy of the lawsuit provided to Engadget, Reddit had already sent a cease-and-desist to Perplexity asking it to stop scraping posts without a license. The company claimed it didn’t use Reddit data, but it also continued to cite the platform in answers from its chatbot. Reddit says it was able to prove Perplexity was using scraped Reddit content by creating a “test post” that “could only be crawled by Google’s search engine and was not otherwise accessible anywhere on the internet.” Within a few hours, queries made to Perplexity’s answer engine were able to reproduce the content of the post.
“The only way that Perplexity could have obtained that Reddit content and then used it in its ‘answer engine’ is if it and/or its co-defendants scraped Google [search results] for that Reddit content and Perplexity then quickly incorporated that data into its answer engine,” the lawsuit claims.
When asked to comment, Perplexity provided the following statement:
Perplexity has not yet received the lawsuit, but we will always fight vigorously for users’ rights to freely and fairly access public knowledge. Our approach remains principled and responsible as we provide factual answers with accurate AI, and we will not tolerate threats against openness and the public interest.
This new lawsuit fits with the aggressive stance Reddit has taken towards protecting its data, including rate-limiting unknown bots and web crawlers in 2024, and even limiting what access the Internet Archive’s Wayback Machine has to its site in August 2025. The company has also sought to define new terms around how websites are crawled by adopting the Really Simple Licensing standard, which adds licensing terms to robots.txt.
Reddit announced Thursday that it is expanding its AI-powered search experience to five new languages: French, German, Spanish, Italian, and Portuguese. With this expansion, the feature is now available in countries like Brazil, France, Germany, Spain, Mexico, and Italy.
Users who have set one of these languages as their default, instead of English, can now chat with the AI in question-and-answer format. Reddit uses a Google AI model to power the feature.
Reddit first debuted AI-powered search last year and has been working to expand it in different ways. The feature is part of Reddit Answers, which lives alongside the platform’s traditional search.
Reddit CEO Steve Huffman said in August that Reddit search has more than 70 million weekly users, while Reddit Answers is used by more than 6 million people. He also discussed plans to unify the search experience during the company’s quarterly earnings call.
Q&A-style search and chat interfaces have been gaining popularity since ChatGPT integrated web search. Incumbent search engines like Google and Brave have introduced similar features to improve user engagement and retention. Newer startups like Perplexity have also gained steam with chat-based search interfaces.
We’ve seen artificial intelligence give some pretty bizarre responses to queries as chatbots become more common. Today, Reddit Answers is in the spotlight after a moderator flagged the AI tool for providing dangerous medical advice that they were unable to disable or hide from view.
The mod saw Reddit Answers suggest that people experiencing chronic pain stop taking their current prescriptions and take high-dose kratom, which is an unregulated substance that is illegal in some states. The user said they then asked Reddit Answers about other medical questions. They received potentially dangerous advice for treating neo-natal fever alongside some accurate actions as well as suggestions that heroin could be used for chronic pain relief. Several other mods, particularly from health-focused subreddits, replied to the original post adding their concerns that they have no way to turn off or flag a problem when Reddit Answers has provided inaccurate or dangerous information in their communities.
A representative from Reddit told 404 Media that Reddit Answers had been updated to address some of the mods’ concerns. “This update ensures that ‘Related Answers’ to sensitive topics, which may have been previously visible on the post detail page (also known as the conversation page), will no longer be displayed,” the spokesperson told the publication. “This change has been implemented to enhance user experience and maintain appropriate content visibility within the platform.” We’ve reached out to Reddit for additional comment about what topics are being excluded but have not received a reply at this time.
While the rep told 404 Media that Reddit Answers “excludes content from private, quarantined and NSFW communities, as well as some mature topics,” the AI tool clearly doesn’t seem equipped to properly deliver medical information, much less to handle the snark, sarcasm or potential bad advice that may be given by other Redditors. Aside from the latest move to not appear on “sensitive topics,” it doesn’t seem like Reddit plans to provide any tools to control how or when AI is being shown in subreddits, which could make the already-challenging task of moderation nearly impossible.