ReportWire

Tag: Emerson College

  • What California’s Proposition 50 Means for Voters in 2025

    [ad_1]

    Recent polls indicate that California’s Proposition 50 is likely to pass. So what does that mean?

    What is it?

    California’s Proposition 50 is a redistricting measure intended to counter Texas’s Republican-favoring redistricting plan by creating more Democratic seats representing California in the House of Representatives. 

    On November 4, 2025, voters will have the chance to vote in favor of or in opposition to these new district lines designed to favor Democrats in the 2026, 2028, and 2030 elections, effectively overriding the map drawn by the state’s nonpartisan independent redistricting commission. This, a decision that would represent a strong departure from California’s commitment to independent redistricting as established during the Great Recession, to put the power in the hands of a citizen panel.

    What’s the impact?

    Though the vast majority of California’s representatives are Democrats, of the 9 current Republican seats, it is likely that 4 to 5 will be cut as a result of this redistricting. This map would heavily impact the likelihood of a reelection for current Republican officeholders Ken Calvert in the Inland Empire, Kevin Kiley in Greater Sacramento, David Valadao in the San Joaquin Valley, and Darrel Issa in the San Diego area. All of which are in districts that are likely to turn blue under this redistricting plan. 

    The Democratic Party sees this proposition as an immediate way to combat the actions of the Trump Administration that are harming Californians, stripping billions of dollars in federal research grants, drastically cutting funds for Medicaid, and separating families through immigration raids.

    This, however, does not mitigate concern for what could be to come in the future for redistricting in Republican led states. States such as Indiana, Florida, and Missouri are also considering redistricting plans to create more Republican seats in the House. 

    Indiana Governor Mike Braun, a Republican even mentioned in a local radio interview that if a state is not “getting involved as well as you can on the political side, you probably are not going to be the first call when it comes to the benefits”, demonstrating the fear that Republican states have about losing Presidential support as a result of staying out of redistricting initiatives.​

    What do the polls say?

    Many polls have been taken regarding this proposition, though all have come up with slightly varying numbers, the consensus demonstrates that Californians are in favor of this proposition. UC Berkeley’s Institute for Governmental Studies found in August that 48 percent of people polled were in favor of the proposal, while 32 percent opposed it. Similarly, polls at Emerson College show that 51 percent of people were in support of the ballot measure while 34 percent were against.

    What are people saying?

    Governor of California Gavin Newsom says that California has no choice but to “fight fire with fire”  against what he claims to be Trump’s attempts to steal the 2026 midterm elections by redrawing state lines in favor of his party. 

    Former Governor of California Arnold Schwarzenegger combated this idea during an appearance he made at the University of Southern California last month by saying, “I hate to get political here, but this is not political. This is more about democracy,” and “If you vote yes on that, we go backwards.” Providing a direct critique of this proposition. 

    He even suggests that people need to lose the idea of having to “fight Trump,” claiming that it doesn’t make sense to “become him” in order to fight him, specifically noting that “Two wrongs don’t make a right.”

    What does this mean for democracy?

    Schwarzenegger also fears that Proposition 50 is an attempt to try to “fight for democracy by getting rid of the democratic principles of California,” which Democratic Assembly member Mark Gonzales disagrees with, asserting that “We had to push back and create five seats of our own in order for us to make sure that we maintained democracy, especially here in California.” 

    [ad_2]

    Amaya Arnic

    Source link

  • Red States Lean Green This Election

    Red States Lean Green This Election

    [ad_1]

    The last 20 years have seen a big change for marijuana.

    The War On Drugs framed a mindset about marijuana for two generations, but in the last 10 years, the country seems to have moved passed it. Now even red states lean green this election. Nixon’s administration went to battle with drug abuse declared “public enemy number one”. But times have changed and so has public opinion and taste. And in this election, even conservative states are polling positive about opening their border for forms of legal cannabis.
    The west coast led the way for legalization with California, Oregon and Washington, but other states were slower in acceptance. But as of 2022, over 50% of the population has access to legal weed and even the AARP has come up in support of it for medical marijuana. And states have enjoyed the robust revenue to the state coffers.  States with fully recreational earn more money from cananbis taxes than alcohol. And crime drops also.

    In Kansas, the Midwest Newsroom partnered with Emerson College Polling to conduct surveys. More than 72% of the state’s voters said they support legalizing medical marijuana. About 56% support legalizing it for recreational use. Republican leaders in the Sunflower state have opposed legalizing marijuana of any kind. But with some movement at the federal level,  recently appointed a special committee on medical marijuana.

    North Dakota voters appear split and largely undecided about the marijuana initiative according to poll commissioned by the North Dakota News Cooperative. The Dakotas are traditionally conservative states, but the North’s sister state to the south is showing a bit of difference. The Chiesman Center for Democracy at the University of South Dakota shows an increase in support, but not quite at the level needed to to pass.

    Utah, which is not a fan of alcohol or caffeine seems to be leaning green. A recent poll found 50% of the Beehive State voters would support recreational cannabis. Another 38% of Utahns surveyed support medical cannabis only and 9% believe cannabis should be illegal entirely. Three percent were “not sure.”

    Florida, one of the largest states, seems to have leaned into saying yes for recreational marijuana according to polls. This is interesting considering the state’s governor, Ron DeSantis, has waged an all out war against the ballot initiative.  Currently, there is a court battle about DeSantis using the state’s resources to put pressure on the media to promote public service announcements against legalization.

    November 5 could be a big day for cannabis, and a look into the mindset of the country.

    [ad_2]

    Terry Hacienda

    Source link

  • More than 100 protesters arrested, 4 police officers injured as pro-Palestinian encampment cleared at Boston’s Emerson College

    More than 100 protesters arrested, 4 police officers injured as pro-Palestinian encampment cleared at Boston’s Emerson College

    [ad_1]

    More than 100 people were arrested and four police officers were injured early Thursday when protesters clashed with Boston police as a pro-Palestinian encampment at Emerson College was cleared.The encampment is one of several set up by students at colleges nationwide to show solidarity with the pro-Palestinian protesters who were arrested at Columbia University in New York earlier this week. An Emerson student said an announcement was made at 1 a.m. that the encampment, which is off Boylston Street, saying anyone in the alley would be arrested.Boston police officers walked out of the Massachusetts Transportation Building at 2 a.m. and made their way through the crowd in the alley.Video from the scene showed dozens of officers in the area, many of whom were wearing protective gear.”I saw one student get shoved to pavement and hands behind them. Protesters seemed compliant — not fighting back or acting violent,” Emerson student Kyle Graff said.Another student who was at the demonstration and left the area said he watched the incident unfold from his dorm window and said he saw officers dragging away some people who resisted arrest. “Being there and seeing the people standing around, getting dragged to the ground, getting arrested, it was horrifying. It was absolutely disgusting. I am still shaking from experience,” the student said.Boston Police Department spokesman Sgt. John Boyle said 108 people were arrested and are expected to be arraigned in Boston Municipal Court.Of the four police officers injured, one suffered serious, but non-life-threatening injuries.Boylston Place Alley is not solely owned by Emerson College and it is a fire alley with a public right of way requirement to access non-Emerson buildings, including the State Transportation Center.Just outside the alley, several police vans were parked to take away protesters, and crime scene tape was placed to cordon off the area.Demonstrators have been urging college officials to support a ceasefire in Gaza and divest from companies and institutions that support Israel.The removal at Emerson comes hours after pro-Palestinian protesters set up another encampment at Harvard Yard.The ACLU said colleges are walking a tight rope balancing First Amendment rights and campus safety.”We’ve been urging campus administrators and law enforcement to exercise restraint in interfering with student demonstrations and encampments,” said Carol Rose, of the ACLU. “These are hard times for colleges and universities. Trying to balance the legal requirement that they ensure education free of discrimination at the same time to ensure the free speech rights of students.”Harvard University is only allowing people with campus IDs onto Harvard Yard and there are signs indicating tents and tables are not allowed without proper permission.At MIT, police are on standby but no arrests have been made thus far in connection with the protests, nor have any threats been reported.

    More than 100 people were arrested and four police officers were injured early Thursday when protesters clashed with Boston police as a pro-Palestinian encampment at Emerson College was cleared.

    The encampment is one of several set up by students at colleges nationwide to show solidarity with the pro-Palestinian protesters who were arrested at Columbia University in New York earlier this week.

    An Emerson student said an announcement was made at 1 a.m. that the encampment, which is off Boylston Street, saying anyone in the alley would be arrested.

    Boston police officers walked out of the Massachusetts Transportation Building at 2 a.m. and made their way through the crowd in the alley.

    Video from the scene showed dozens of officers in the area, many of whom were wearing protective gear.

    “I saw one student get shoved to pavement and hands behind them. Protesters seemed compliant — not fighting back or acting violent,” Emerson student Kyle Graff said.

    Another student who was at the demonstration and left the area said he watched the incident unfold from his dorm window and said he saw officers dragging away some people who resisted arrest.

    “Being there and seeing the people standing around, getting dragged to the ground, getting arrested, it was horrifying. It was absolutely disgusting. I am still shaking from experience,” the student said.

    Boston Police Department spokesman Sgt. John Boyle said 108 people were arrested and are expected to be arraigned in Boston Municipal Court.

    Of the four police officers injured, one suffered serious, but non-life-threatening injuries.

    Boylston Place Alley is not solely owned by Emerson College and it is a fire alley with a public right of way requirement to access non-Emerson buildings, including the State Transportation Center.

    Just outside the alley, several police vans were parked to take away protesters, and crime scene tape was placed to cordon off the area.

    Demonstrators have been urging college officials to support a ceasefire in Gaza and divest from companies and institutions that support Israel.

    The removal at Emerson comes hours after pro-Palestinian protesters set up another encampment at Harvard Yard.

    The ACLU said colleges are walking a tight rope balancing First Amendment rights and campus safety.

    “We’ve been urging campus administrators and law enforcement to exercise restraint in interfering with student demonstrations and encampments,” said Carol Rose, of the ACLU. “These are hard times for colleges and universities. Trying to balance the legal requirement that they ensure education free of discrimination at the same time to ensure the free speech rights of students.”

    Harvard University is only allowing people with campus IDs onto Harvard Yard and there are signs indicating tents and tables are not allowed without proper permission.

    At MIT, police are on standby but no arrests have been made thus far in connection with the protests, nor have any threats been reported.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Dozens of arrests reported overnight at pro-Palestinian protest at Emerson College

    Dozens of arrests reported overnight at pro-Palestinian protest at Emerson College

    [ad_1]

    Emerson students warned Boston Police may intervene in pro-Palestinian protests


    Emerson students warned Boston Police may intervene in pro-Palestinian protests

    02:25

    BOSTON – On Wednesday, Emerson College notified pro-Palestinian protesters in Downtown Boston they were violating city law by occupying Boylston Place and turning it into a tent city. The college warned students that police have the right to respond.

    Despite that, students didn’t stand down and continued to plant Palestinian flags and signage saying they wouldn’t leave.

    Police moved in overnight and started making arrests. Numerous reports put the number in the dozens.

    The school newspaper, The Berkeley Beacon, said at least 41 people were arrested.

    A group called Emerson Students for Justice in Palestine claimed more than 100 arrests were made.

    Emerson students make demands   

    Student protests against the Israel-Hamas war are growing in Boston. Emerson College students are demanding the administration support their message of Palestinian liberation and until then, they say they will continue occupying Boylston Place, an alley near the college.

    “We’re going to stay until our demands are met or until we are forcibly dragged out,” said Emerson College student Amrita Bala.

    Students were warned by the college Wednesday their tent-city built outside of the Department of Transportation building violates Boston city ordinances Students said they were prepared for potential repercussions.

    Emerson protests
    Pro-Palestinian students set up camp in Boylston Place

    CBS Boston


    “At this point this is an effective way to make sure our demands are being met and we can keep putting pressure on these institutions,” said Rayan Afif.

    Students for Justice in Palestine, an unaffiliated group of Emerson College students, listed demands it said had to be met before it its members would will leave the area.

    “Disclose all financial ties, divest from Israel, end student suppression and call for an immediate and permanent ceasefire in Palestine,” said one group member.

    Students protest in solidarity with Columbia University  

    Students say they’re standing in solidarity with Columbia University after arrests were made on the New York City campus. Students at Harvard are now doing the same, with an encampment in Harvard Yard. The university warned students blocking pedestrian pathways or access to building entrances is prohibited and students could face disciplinary action.

    Israeli Americans positioned themselves across the street at Emerson hoping police would take action.

    “There’s a residential building right there, and a lot of people I know have had to move to hotels in order to escape the noise,” said Tyler Gelman.

    They said they were frustrated by what they called a misinformed message and said they were hoping for calm on campus.

    “They’re asking Emerson to divest,” Gelman said. “It’s a lot of ‘we want these things’ but Emerson cannot provide these things.”

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Why a Blue-Leaning Swing State Is Getting Redder

    Why a Blue-Leaning Swing State Is Getting Redder

    [ad_1]

    Last week, when The New York Times and Siena College released a poll that showed President Joe Biden in trouble in battleground states, Democrats began to sound apocalyptic. The panic, turbocharged by social media, was disproportionate to what the surveys actually showed. Although the results in my home state, Nevada, were the worst for the president out of the six swing states that were polled, the findings are almost certainly not reflective of the reality here, at least as I’ve observed it and reported on it.

    Nevertheless, they bring to the surface trends that should worry Democrats—and not just in Nevada.

    The Times/Siena data show Donald Trump ahead of Biden in Nevada 52 percent to 41 percent, a much larger margin than the former president’s lead in the other battleground states. Could this be true? I’m skeptical, and I’m not alone. After the poll came out, I spoke with a handful of experts in both parties here, and none thinks Trump is truly ahead by double digits in the state, where he lost by about 2.5 points in the previous two presidential cycles. But Nevada is going to be competitive, perhaps more so than ever.

    Some of the Times/Siena poll’s internal numbers gave me pause. Among registered voters in Clark County, where Las Vegas is located and where 70 percent of the electorate resides, the poll found Trump ahead of Biden 50–45. But Democrats make up 34 percent of active voters in the county, compared with Republicans’ 25 percent, and Biden won Clark by nine percentage points in 2020.

    Other recent polls, not quite as highly rated as Times/Siena’s, have found the presidential race here to be much closer than the Times did. Last month, a CNN poll of registered Nevada voters found Biden and Trump virtually tied. Recent surveys from Emerson College, which has been unreliable in the state in the past, and Morning Consult/Bloomberg both had Trump up three points among likely voters. The Times/Siena polling outfit has a good reputation, but shortly before the 2020 election, it found Biden ahead of Trump in Nevada by six percentage points, more than double Biden’s eventual margin of victory.

    Nevada is difficult to poll for a variety of reasons. Here as much as anywhere else, pollsters tend to underestimate the number of people they need to survey by cellphone to get a representative sample, and they generally don’t do enough bilingual polling in Nevada, where nearly a third of the population is Hispanic. Nevada also has a transient population, lots of residents working 24/7 shifts, and an electorate that’s less educated than most other states’. (“I love the poorly educated,” Trump said after winning Nevada’s Republican caucuses in 2016.) The polling challenge has become only more acute, because nonpartisan voters now outnumber Democrats and Republicans in Nevada, making it harder for pollsters to accurately capture the Democratic or Republican vote. (Since 2020, a state law has allowed voters to register at the DMV, and if they fail to do so, their party affiliation is defaulted to independent.)

    Nevada matters in presidential elections, but we are also, let’s face it, a tad weird.

    Still, Democrats have reasons to worry. Nevada was clobbered by COVID disproportionately to the rest of the country, because our economy is so narrowly focused on the casino industry. The aftereffects—unemployment, inflation—are still very much being felt here. Nevada’s jobless rate is the highest in the country, at 5.4 percent. That’s down dramatically from an astonishing 28.2 percent in April 2020, when the governor closed casinos for a few months. Although the situation has clearly improved, many casino workers still haven’t been rehired.

    Democrat Steve Sisolak was the only incumbent governor in his party to lose in 2022, and his defeat was due at least partly to the fallout from COVID. Fairly or not, President Biden wears a lot of that too, as all presidents do when voters are unhappy with the economy. The Morning Consult/Bloomberg poll illuminated the bleak pessimism of Nevada voters, 76 percent of whom think the U.S. economy is going in the wrong direction.

    Here, as elsewhere, voters are also concerned about Biden’s age, and that informs their broader views of him. Sixty-two percent of Nevadans disapprove of Biden’s performance, according to the Times, and only 40 percent have a favorable impression of him. Trump’s numbers, although awful—44 percent see him favorably—are better than Biden’s here, as well as in some blue or bluish states.

    In Nevada, and in general, Biden is losing support among key groups—young and nonwhite voters. The Times/Siena poll found Biden and Trump tied among Hispanics in the state, despite the fact that Latinos have been a bedrock of the Democratic base here for a decade and a half. In the 2022 midterms, polls taken early in the race showed Catherine Cortez Masto, the first Latina elected to the U.S. Senate, losing Hispanic support, though her campaign managed to reverse that trend enough to win by a very slim margin.

    Democratic presidential nominees have won Nevada in every election since 2008. Democrats also hold the state’s two U.S. Senate seats and three of the four House seats, and the party dominates both houses of the legislature. But the state has been slowly shifting to the right—not just in polling but in Election Day results. In 2020, Nevada was the only battleground state that saw worse Democratic performance compared with 2016, unless you include the more solidly red Florida. Nevada’s new Republican governor, Joe Lombardo, is building a formidable political machine. Republicans have made inroads with working-class white voters here, leaving Democrats with an ever-diminishing margin of error.

    Abortion, an issue that was crucial to Cortez Masto’s narrow victory, could help Biden in Nevada. The Times/Siena poll showed that only a quarter of Nevadans think abortion should be always or mostly illegal. A 1990 referendum made abortion up to 24 weeks legal here, and the law can be changed only by another popular vote. Democrats in Nevada, though, want to take those protections a step further next year and are trying to qualify a ballot measure that would amend the state constitution to guarantee the right to abortion. As the off-year elections last week showed, that issue, more than the choice between Biden and Trump, could be what saves the president a year from now. Nevada also has a nationally watched Senate race in 2024, in which the incumbent Democrat, Jacky Rosen, has already signaled that she will mimic her colleague Cortez Masto and put abortion front and center in her campaign.

    So many events could intervene between now and next November, foreign and/or domestic, and we have yet to see how effective the Trump and Biden campaigns will be, assuming that each man is his party’s nominee. Democratic Senator Harry Reid was deeply unpopular here in 2009, then got reelected by almost six percentage points; Barack Obama was thought to be in trouble in 2011, then won Nevada and reelection.

    Democrats clearly hope that if Trump becomes the Republican nominee, many voters will see the election as a binary choice and will back Biden. But if the election instead becomes a referendum on Biden’s tenure, including the economy he has presided over, Trump could plausibly win Nevada—and the Electoral College.

    [ad_2]

    Jon Ralston

    Source link