ReportWire

Tag: cdc

  • ‘Unbelievably contagious’: Measles cases soar nationwide: What you need to know – WTOP News

    [ad_1]

    More than 980 have been reported across 26 states as of Monday, according to the CDC. That’s more than four times the total number of measles cases recorded for all of 2025.

    The United States is seeing nearly 1,000 cases of measles in the first two months of 2026, a record surge that has alarmed health care providers.

    More than 980 have been reported across 26 states as of Monday, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. That’s more than four times the total number of measles cases recorded for all of 2025.

    Virginia has recorded 10 cases, including six in children ages 0 to 4.

    In Maryland, health officials have reported several possible exposure locations after people with confirmed measles cases traveled through the state in January and February. None of those cases are connected, and Maryland has not recorded a confirmed measles case since March 2025.

    Jennifer Walsh, an assistant professor at the School of Nursing at George Washington University, told WTOP that what’s “so scary to pediatric providers is how unbelievably contagious and how devastating measles can be.”

    Walsh said unvaccinated people are most at risk for contracting the disease.

    “If you’re unvaccinated, (and) you’re in a room even up to two hours after someone with measles is in that room, you basically have a 90% chance of contracting measles,” she said.

    According to the CDC’s website, severe complications from measles can include pneumonia, encephalitis or swelling of the brain, and death. CDC data show that nearly three of every 1,000 children infected with measles will die from complications.

    The current spike is happening despite the widespread availability of vaccines that have protected against measles for decades.

    Walsh said families may opt out of vaccinating their children because of conflicting information about the safety of the MMR and MMRV vaccines. In most cases, doctors recommend two doses of the MMR vaccine to protect against measles, mumps and rubella. The MMRV vaccine also protects against chickenpox.

    Walsh, who is also a certified pediatric nurse practitioner in primary care, said it’s important for providers to listen to families’ questions and concerns regarding the safety of the vaccines.

    She suggested that health care providers “try to find out what they have been hearing, what they’re most concerned about, what they’re worried about,” then “determine what is based in evidence, and what is misinformation that they’ve been fed.”

    Walsh said families are most receptive to vaccinating their children when someone they know, or someone in their community, has been affected by measles or when there’s a confirmed case nearby.

    Walsh said she often shares her own experience as a parent, telling other parents that “for me and my family, vaccination was definitely what I did, and what I continue to recommend.”

    Get breaking news and daily headlines delivered to your email inbox by signing up here.

    © 2026 WTOP. All Rights Reserved. This website is not intended for users located within the European Economic Area.

    [ad_2]

    Kate Ryan

    Source link

  • Colorado sues to block Trump administration from cutting public health grants

    [ad_1]

    Colorado filed a lawsuit Wednesday to prevent the Trump administration from canceling more than $20 million in grants for public health.

    On Monday, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services notified Congress it wouldn’t pay $600 million worth of grants already awarded in Colorado, California, Illinois and Minnesota — all states led by Democratic governors.

    The four states asked a federal court in Illinois’ Northern District to issue an order preventing the federal government from withholding the funds while their lawsuit plays out.

    Colorado Attorney General Phil Weiser’s office said the existing grants totaled about $22 million, and the cuts would reduce Colorado’s public health funding in the future by an estimated $4 million.

    The funding comes through the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and goes toward developing the public health infrastructure and workforce, as well as finding and preventing sexually transmitted infections.

    One of the recipients in Colorado that will lose funding is using it to increase HIV testing around Denver and Colorado Springs, with a focus on gay and bisexual men of color.

    [ad_2]

    Meg Wingerter

    Source link

  • Parents’ guide to measles: How to prevent infection

    [ad_1]

    After being eliminated from the United States in 2000, measles is making a comeback — and not only in Season 1 of HBO’s popular drama, “The Pitt.” The cases are now numerous enough that the U.S. is on track to lose its measles-free status. 

    In 2025, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention reported 2,267 confirmed measles cases, the most since 1991. So far this year, 588 cases have been confirmed, many stemming from a large, ongoing outbreak in South Carolina. But other states, including Florida, North Carolina and Utah, had also reported cases by late January. 

    For many parents of young kids, who are especially vulnerable to the virus, measles is a disease of the past — widespread vaccination made infections rare. It’s even new for some doctors, many of whom are encountering the first infections of their careers.

    But as cases pop up in communities nationwide, we thought it was time for a crash course on the virus and how to protect your family. 

    What are the symptoms of measles? 

    Measles is a highly contagious respiratory virus that causes a rash. Even milder cases that don’t require hospitalization are miserable, doctors told us.

    “This is not a trivial virus,” said Dr. William Schaffner, an infectious disease doctor at Vanderbilt University. “I would not wish measles on any child.”

    Symptoms typically appear one to two weeks after exposure. The first symptoms aren’t unusual — a cough, runny nose, fever, and red watery eyes. 

    A few days after symptoms start, tiny white spots, called Koplik spots, may appear on the inside of the mouth. Three to five days in, the measles rash’s flat, red spots will appear, starting on the face and moving down the body to the trunk and limbs. On darker skin tones, the spots can appear purple-ish or dark brown.  

    “The measles rash can look like other childhood rashes like scarlet fever, roseola and rubella,” said Dr. Peter Chin-Hong, an infectious disease doctor at the University of California, San Francisco. But the combination of cough, runny nose, and red eyes amid an outbreak of the disease “is kind of a clincher for measles.”

    Measles can cause high fevers, over 104 degrees Fahrenheit. Most people recover in around 10 days, but complications are possible. 

    A sign warning of measles is posted on a glass door as a patients wait in the family medicine wing of at the Texas Tech Physicians of the Permian Basin Monday, Feb. 24, 2025, in Odessa, Texas. (AP)

    What are complications from the measles?

    Beyond feeling sick and miserable, the most common complications are ear infections and diarrhea, which can lead to dehydration. 

    More severe complications are possible. According to the CDC, about 1 in 5 unvaccinated people who get measles in the U.S. requires hospitalization.

    Among children, about 1 in 20 who are infected will develop pneumonia, and about 1 in 1,000 experience swelling of the brain that can cause deafness and permanent disability. 

    Tragically, as many as 3 in 1,000 children will die from complications of the disease.

    An even rarer fatal complication is subacute sclerosing panencephalitis, which doesn’t appear until around 7 to 10 years after infection. This has no cure and causes a slow, progressive cognitive decline into a vegetative state and then death. 

    Certain groups are at especially high risk for complications: children under 5, adults older than 20, pregnant women, and people who have compromised immune systems. Most people fall into one of those groups.

    How is the measles spread? 

    Like many other respiratory viruses, measles is spread through coughing or sneezing. But it’s highly infectious. Of people who aren’t vaccinated or who haven’t had a previous infection, up to 90% will get sick after being exposed to someone with measles.

    And you can get it from someone you’ve never even met or seen. If a person with measles has been in a room, someone else can get infected from breathing the same air, up to two hours after the infected person has left.

    A person with measles is infectious four days before the rash appears and four days afterward, according to the CDC.

    Face masks and regular hand washing may provide some limited protection. Given how infectious measles is, “I would not want to rely on a mask or hand washing alone in order to reduce my chance of getting measles,” Schaffner said. 

    But you don’t need to lock yourself in the house. If you are living in an area with no reported cases of measles, “the likelihood of you having measles is close to zero,” said Dr. Aaron Milstone, a pediatric infectious disease doctor at Johns Hopkins University. The probability is even lower if you are vaccinated. 

    How is measles treated?

    There is no cure for measles. Doctors can provide supportive care and try to manage the symptoms — reduce fever, prevent dehydration, treat secondary bacterial infections — until the disease has run its course, but there is no treatment.

    For people who are deficient in vitamin A, taking supplements can reduce the risk of serious complications once they are sick. But there is no evidence that vitamin A prevents infection.

    “There’s nothing to do for kids with measles,” said Milstone. “It’s ‘cross your fingers and hope for the best.’ And, as a parent, that scares me.” 

    To prevent further spread, public health departments place unvaccinated people who have come into contact with an infected person under quarantine. Home quarantine lasts around three weeks. 

    Hundreds are currently quarantined in South Carolina thanks to the outbreak there. 

    Should I get vaccinated? 

    Doctors say yes. 

    Vaccination is the best way to protect yourself and your children from measles. 

    In the U.S., it is recommended that all children be vaccinated against measles with the MMR vaccine that also protects against mumps and rubella. The first dose is recommended at 12 to 15 months, and the second dose between 4 and 6 years. This recommendation didn’t change with the CDC’s recent updates to the childhood vaccine schedule

    Older children and adults who were not vaccinated as children can still get vaccinated with two doses at least 28 days apart

    Two doses of the MMR vaccine are about 97% effective at preventing measles, meaning if you are vaccinated, you are highly unlikely to be infected. Protection is usually lifelong.  

    Last year, 93% of all measles cases were among people who were unvaccinated or whose vaccination status was unknown. 

    Breakthrough infections among those who are fully vaccinated are still possible, and accounted for 4% of cases in 2025.

    Milstone advised adults to double-check what their vaccine status is, in case they only received one dose as a child. But for people who got two doses as a child, there is no need to get another shot as an adult, even if you are living in an area with an outbreak. 


    A vial of the measles, mumps and rubella vaccine is on display at the Lubbock Health Department, Feb. 26, 2025, in Lubbock, Texas. (AP)

    Does the vaccine have side effects? 

    The MMR vaccine uses a live but weakened version of the measles virus.

    There is a small risk of a slight fever and mild rash following vaccination. 

    “It’s not measles, but you know, this is a tamed virus, so on occasion, it can produce a very mild version of the illness,” said Schaffner.

    The MMR vaccine has long been a target of claims linking the vaccine to autism.

    Decades of epidemiological research have not demonstrated a link between autism and the MMR vaccine.

    The claim traces back to a 1998 paper by a British doctor who lost his medical license after his study was found to be — in the British medical journal BMJ’s words — an “elaborate fraud.”  

    Because it is a live virus, it cannot be administered to pregnant women or people who have compromised immune systems. 

    That means that kids who are already at the greatest risk of getting sick are those who can’t get protection. Schaffner said he believes healthy people have an obligation to their neighbors who cannot be immunized and are at risk of severe disease.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Calling the Shots: Tracking RFK Jr. on Vaccines

    [ad_1]

    It was one of President Donald Trump’s more audacious picks for his Cabinet: anti-vaccine activist and alternative health advocate Robert F. Kennedy Jr. to helm the nation’s health department.

    Kennedy, however, won over the senators needed to confirm him to lead the Department of Health and Human Services, promising not to remove government website statements pointing out that vaccines do not cause autism and to keep current vaccine approval and safety monitoring systems intact. Ahead of being tapped by Trump for the role, he said he wouldn’t take vaccines away from those who wanted them while stressing a desire for individual choice.

    Since his confirmation, Kennedy has toed the line between backing vaccination as a preventive public health tool and making statements or overseeing developments that threaten to undermine that tool. His moves have played out against the backdrop of an explosion in vaccine-preventable measles cases in West Texas and an intense flu season that resulted in high rates of hospitalization, along with bird flu outbreaks that have raised the specter of another pandemic.

    Here’s a look at notable vaccine-related moves and remarks made by Kennedy or under his authority since he was sworn in as head of HHS on Feb. 13:

    Sign Up for U.S. News Healthcare of Tomorrow Bulletin

    Your trusted source for critical insights and solutions-focused analysis.

    Sign up to receive the latest updates from U.S. News & World Report and our trusted partners and sponsors. By clicking submit, you are agreeing to our Terms and Conditions & Privacy Policy.

    • Dec. 16, 2025 – The CDC ended the long-standing recommendation for all newborns to receive the hepatitis B vaccine at birth after its revamped committee of outside vaccine experts voted 8-3 to scrap it. The agency now recommends parents consult with a healthcare provider to decide whether infants born to hepatitis B-negative mothers should get the vaccine. “We are restoring the balance of informed consent to parents whose newborns face little risk of contracting hepatitis B,” CDC acting Director Jim O’Neill said in a statement.
    • Nov. 28, 2025 – Dr. Vinay Prasad, the director of the FDA’s Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, said in a memo to agency staff that a review “found that at least 10 children have died after and because of receiving COVID-19 vaccination.” In the memo, which was first reported by The New York Times, Prasad said the true number could be higher and accused the agency of ignoring safety concerns. He did not include information like the ages of the kids, whether they had health problems or how the agency staff determined the vaccine-death link. Prasad said he would propose new oversight and review of vaccines.

    • Sept. 18-19, 2025 – The CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices held a chaotic meeting where it voted to weaken COVID-19 shot recommendations, saying that individuals should consult with their healthcare provider about whether they should get the shot. They decided against a prescription requirement for the shot in a narrow vote. The panel also voted against recommending a combination jab against measles, mumps, rubella and chickenpox, or MMRV, for children under the age of 4 and postponed a vote on the hepatitis B vaccine for newborns.

    • July 7, 2025 – Several medical groups sued Kennedy and HHS over his changes to federal vaccine policies, including his decision to remove healthy children and pregnant women from the COVID-19 vaccine schedule, which the plaintiffs asked the court to vacate. The lawsuit accuses Kennedy of working “to dismantle the longstanding, Congressionally-authorized, science- and evidence-based vaccine infrastructure that has prevented the deaths of untold millions of Americans.”

    • Aug. 27, 2025 – Kennedy announced that emergency use authorizations for COVID-19 shots were rescinded, instead issuing full marketing authorization for the shots – but only for those who are at “higher risk” of severe COVID-19. The FDA authorization is for adults 65 and older as well as for children and adults with at least one medical condition that puts them at risk of severe illness.

    • July 22, 2025 – Kennedy accepted a recommendation from the CDC’s ACIP to remove the mercury-based preservative thimerosal from all influenza vaccines distributed in the U.S. “Injecting any amount of mercury into children when safe, mercury-free alternatives exist defies common sense and public health responsibility,” Kennedy posted on social media. However, many studies have shown that the small amount of thimerosal used in vaccines is harmless. The move is not expected to impact many Americans, as the vast majority of flu vaccines distributed in the U.S. do not contain the preservative.  

    • May 27, 2025 – Kennedy announced via social media that the CDC was no longer recommending the COVID-19 vaccine for healthy pregnant women and children, citing a “lack of clinical data” to support administering repeat shots for those populations. The move came despite the agency listing pregnancy as a health risk factor for developing complications from COVID-19.

    • July 29, 2025 – Democrats on the Senate Health Committee announced that they would investigate Kennedy’s overhaul of the CDC’s ACIP, which makes vaccine recommendations for Americans. “By removing all 17 of ACIP’s members and replacing them with eight individuals handpicked to advance your anti-vaccine agenda, you have put decades of non-partisan, science-backed work – and, as a result, Americans’ lives – at risk,” the Democrats wrote in a letter to Kennedy. 

    • June 25, 2025 – HHS officials missed a self-set deadline to release ethics forms for new members of the committee before a June meeting. Eventually, Kennedy’s conflict-of-interest database was updated with significantly less information on the new members than prior members. 

    • June 11, 2025 – Kennedy announced eight new ACIP members. At least half of the picks had spoken out against vaccination in some way, according to The New York Times. Infectious disease experts accused Kennedy of breaking his pledge not to appoint “ideological anti-vaxxers” to the panel.

    • June 9, 2025 – Kennedy announced that he was removing all 17 members of the CDC’s ACIP, which makes vaccine recommendations for Americans. “A clean sweep is necessary to reestablish public confidence in vaccine science,” Kennedy said in a statement. The removal went against a promise Kennedy made to GOP Sen. Bill Cassidy of Louisiana to gain the senator’s vote for Kennedy’s confirmation. 

    • Nov. 19, 2025 – The CDC revised its long-held stance that vaccines don’t cause autism, now saying on its website that the consensus is “not an evidence-based claim.” It continues: “Studies supporting a link have been ignored by health authorities.” The change sparked outcry from public health groups as well as Cassidy, who voted for Kennedy’s confirmation after gaining several commitments from him, including one to not remove language on the CDC website pointing out that vaccines do not cause autism. “What parents need to hear right now is vaccines for measles, polio, hepatitis B and other childhood diseases are safe and effective and will not cause autism,” Cassidy posted on social media after the website was updated. 

    • Sept. 22, 2025 – Kennedy joined Trump at a White House event where the president claimed that vaccines should “be taken separately” rather than as a combined shot and that “it seems when you mix them, there could be a problem.” Trump also promoted claims about vaccines and autism, saying, “I think I can say that there are certain groups of people that don’t take vaccines and don’t take any pills that have no autism.” Kennedy added that the Trump administration will be “closely examining” vaccines as it seeks to find the cause of autism, which the HHS secretary had previously promised would come by September. 

    • March 25, 2025 – The Washington Post reported that HHS had hired David Geier to study potential connections between vaccines and autism – a debunked theory he has previously promoted that again drew the spotlight after Kennedy refused to reject the claim during his confirmation hearings. Geier faced disciplinary action from state regulators more than a decade ago for practicing medicine without a license and was listed as a data analyst in the HHS employee directory, according to the Post. 

    • Jan. 5, 2026 – The CDC announced a revamped childhood vaccine schedule that decreased the number of vaccines recommended for children, nixing shots for flu, rotavirus, hepatitis A, hepatitis B, some forms of meningitis and RSV. Vaccines for those diseases are only recommended now for certain groups deemed high risk. The Trump administration said that all shots would continue to be covered by insurance companies. “This decision protects children, respects families and rebuilds trust in public health,” Kennedy said in a statement. The American Academy of Pediatrics and other public health organizations sued over the move, calling it “harmful and unlawful.”
    • Sept. 9, 2025 – A new MAHA strategy report said that HHS and the White House Domestic Policy Council will develop a framework focused on “ensuring America has the best childhood vaccine schedule.”

    • Feb. 18, 2025 – In his first address to agency staff after taking over as HHS secretary, Kennedy said a commission would investigate the childhood vaccination schedule, questioning whether it was among “possible factors” tied to poor health in the U.S. Kennedy said the Make America Healthy Again commission – created by a Trump order – would convene “representatives of all viewpoints” to examine potential causes behind a “drastic rise in chronic disease,” including some issues that “were formerly taboo and insufficiently scrutinized.” 

    • Aug. 27, 2025 – The White House fired CDC Director Susan Monarez less than a month into her new role after she clashed with Kennedy over vaccine policies. Kennedy reportedly asked Monarez to fire career agency officials and commit to backing his own advisers, which she refused to do. Four high-ranking officials resigned in support of the former director. 

    • July 2025 – Prasad, the FDA’s top vaccine official and Trump’s replacement for Dr. Peter Marks, left the post after less than three months on the job. Prasad “did not want to be a distraction,” an HHS spokesperson said in a statement, adding that he was leaving the role to “spend more time with his family.” But less than two weeks after his ouster, Prasad was rehired to the same role. “At the FDA’s request, Dr. Vinay Prasad is resuming leadership of the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research,” HHS spokesperson Andrew Nixon said.

    • March 28, 2025 – The Wall Street Journal reported that Marks – the FDA’s former top vaccine official and head of the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research – submitted his resignation after being forced to either resign or be fired. In a resignation letter, Marks said he’d been “willing to work to address (Kennedy’s) concerns regarding vaccine safety and transparency,” but accused the HHS chief of merely wishing for “subservient confirmation of his misinformation and lies.”

    • May 14, 2025 – Kennedy, in his testimony to lawmakers on Trump’s budget proposal that would slash the HHS budget by more than a quarter, said that his “opinions about vaccines are irrelevant.” He added that he doesn’t think “people should be taking medical advice from me.” When Kennedy was questioned about whether he would hypothetically vaccinate a child of his for measles, he said, “probably, for measles.” He wouldn’t answer the same question about vaccines for chicken pox or polio. 

    • April 2025 – Kennedy told CBS News after the second measles death in an unvaccinated child in the U.S. that people should get the measles vaccine but that the “government should not be mandating those.” Despite his endorsement of the vaccine, Kennedy said in the same interview that “we’re always going to have measles, no matter what happens, as the vaccine wanes very quickly.” However, according to the CDC, most people who are vaccinated against measles “will be protected for life.”

    • March 11, 2025 – In an interview with Fox News’ Sean Hannity, Kennedy said the measles vaccine “does cause deaths every year … so people ought to be able to make that choice for themselves.” According to the Infectious Diseases Society of America, no deaths have been found to be related to the measles, mumps and rubella vaccine among healthy people, while “there have been rare cases of deaths from vaccine side effects among children who are immune compromised.” The CDC recommends such individuals not get the MMR vaccine or wait to get it.

    • March 4, 2025 – In an interview with Fox News, Kennedy stressed nutrition and exercise as ways to avoid being severely impacted by measles: “It’s very, very difficult for measles to kill a healthy person.” He said the area in West Texas undergoing a measles outbreak is “kind of a food desert” and that malnutrition “may have been an issue” for a child who died of measles in that outbreak. State health officials said the child, who was not vaccinated, “had no known underlying conditions.”

    • March 2, 2025 – Kennedy wrote in a Fox News op-ed that “studies have found that vitamin A can dramatically reduce measles mortality.” He pointed to a CDC recommendation, updated after he took office, supporting the use of vitamin A to treat measles infections. While health experts acknowledge that vitamin A can be beneficial for patients with a measles infection, they’ve also emphasized it is not a replacement for vaccination and warned that it can cause dangerous health complications when given in excess.

    • December 2025 – HHS terminated millions in grant money for the American Academy of Pediatrics because the initiatives “no longer align with the Department’s mission or priorities,” according to an HHS spokesman. The group has criticized the changes Kennedy has made to federal vaccine policies. “The sudden withdrawal of these funds will directly impact and potentially harm infants, children, youth and their families in communities across the United States,” said Mark Del Monte, the academy’s chief executive and executive vice president.
    • Aug. 5, 2025 – HHS announced it will pull contracts and cut funding for 22 vaccine development projects totaling nearly $500 million. “After reviewing the science and consulting top experts at NIH and FDA, HHS has determined that mRNA technology poses more risks than benefits for these respiratory viruses,” Kennedy said in a video announcement on social media, referring to the vaccine technology used in COVID-19 and flu shots. But infectious disease experts argued the decision puts the U.S. at risk for future pandemics, crediting mRNA technology for the fast turnaround of the COVID-19 vaccines. 

    • March 2025 – The Trump administration targeted NIH grants aimed at studying vaccine hesitancy and how to improve immunization levels. According to NPR, more than 40 grants related to vaccine hesitancy were canceled. 

    • January 2026 – Kennedy removed at least four members of the Advisory Commission on Childhood Vaccinations, which reviews issues relating to the Vaccine Injury Compensation Program. The committee suggests which vaccines and what conditions should be covered by the program, which Kennedy plans to revamp.
    • Sept. 9, 2025 – In its MAHA strategy report, the Trump administration said that HHS and NIH will “investigate vaccine injuries with improved data collection and analysis, including through a new vaccine injury research program at the NIH Clinical Center that may expand to centers around the country.”

    • July 28, 2025 – Kennedy posted on social media his plan to revamp the federal system to compensate people harmed by vaccines. Kennedy said that the Vaccine Injury Compensation Program “is broken, and I intend to fix it.” According to Kennedy, the program has paid out $5.4 billion to 12,000 petitioners since its inception in 1986. He accused the program of dismissing cases that have merit and slow-walking others. “I will not allow the VICP to continue to ignore its mandate and fail its mission of quickly and fairly compensating vaccine-injured individuals,” Kennedy said. The program “is a no-fault alternative to the traditional legal system for resolving vaccine injury petitions,” according to the Health Resources and Services Administration. 

    • Aug. 14, 2025 – HHS announced it is reinstating the Task Force on Safer Childhood Vaccines – a panel created by Congress to improve safety and oversight – in a move requested by Children’s Health Defense, the anti-vaccine advocacy group Kennedy previously led. The task force, which was disbanded in 1988, will now work with the Advisory Commission on Childhood Vaccines to produce regular recommendations. The move comes after Children’s Health Defense sued Kennedy in July for failing to establish the task force. 

    – Former U.S. News writer Steven Ross Johnson contributed to this report

    [ad_2]

    Cecelia Smith-Schoenwalder

    Source link

  • What CDC vaccine schedule changes mean for vaccine access

    [ad_1]

    The federal government recently made sweeping changes to its list of recommended childhood vaccines, raising a host of questions for parents.

    Until early this year, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention had recommended every child be routinely immunized against 17 diseases. On Jan. 5, however, federal officials unilaterally dropped the recommendations for immunization against five of those diseases. 

    Vaccines against hepatitis A, hepatitis B, rotavirus, meningococcal disease and the flu are now recommended only for children considered at high risk of serious illness — or after “shared clinical decision-making,” or consultation between doctors and parents.

    Doctors told PolitiFact they did not expect the vaccine schedule changes to immediately make it more difficult to get your child vaccinated against these diseases. 

    In the future, though, that could change. 

    “The practical impact isn’t that motivated families suddenly can’t access vaccines, but that the system becomes less reliable and more dependent on a parent knowing what to request and when,” said Dr. Jake Scott, an infectious disease specialist at Stanford Medicine.

    Here are some things we learned.

    An immunization poster is seen outside of an examination room where Tammy Camp, left, and Summer Davies, both with the Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, speak to The Associated Press in Lubbock, Texas, Feb. 25, 2025. (AP)

    Q: Can kids still get the vaccines that the CDC just removed from the routine childhood vaccination schedule? Will health insurance cover it? 

    A: Yes, children can still get the vaccines. And in the immediate aftermath of the CDC’s changes, most families should still be able to without paying out-of-pocket insurance fees, Scott said.

    A Jan. 5 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services fact sheet said that all immunizations that the CDC previously recommended would continue to be covered by Affordable Care Act insurance plans and federal programs including Medicaid, Vaccines for Children, and the Children’s Health Insurance Program. The Trump administration also said insurance companies are still required to cover all of the vaccines without cost-sharing. Insurance companies have largely echoed this message. 

    Responding in September to different vaccine recommendation changes, AHIP, a national trade association for health insurers, said health plans would cover through 2026 the updated COVID and flu vaccines and all other immunizations that the CDC recommended as of Sept. 1, 2025.

    An AHIP spokesperson confirmed Jan. 13 that was still true. A Blue Cross Blue Shield Association spokesperson, meanwhile, said its companies would continue covering all immunizations the CDC recommended as of Jan. 1, 2025, without cost-sharing. 

    Q: What does “shared clinical decision making” mean? 

    A: If a vaccine is now recommended based on “shared clinical decision making,” that means a patient — or, in the case of children, their parent or guardian — must consult with a health care provider before getting it, according to the CDC

    These health care providers can include primary care physicians, specialists, physician assistants, nurse practitioners, registered nurses, and pharmacists, the CDC says on its website. They are supposed to talk with the patient about a vaccine’s benefits and risks. 

    How much authority certain health care providers have to provide that information varies by state, according to the Common Health Coalition, a union of health care organizations. So while medical assistants and pharmacy techs can administer some vaccines in most states, they likely aren’t qualified to have conversations that satisfy the shared clinical decision making requirement, the coalition said

    In practice, this means parents might need to plan vaccine conversations in advance by booking additional doctor appointments. Ultimately, this extra step could make it harder and more complicated for people to get vaccinated.

    “If your 3-year-old child had their wellness visit in June, under these rules, they can’t go to a flu or COVID mass vaccination clinic and get their vaccines in the fall,” said Dr. Molly O’Shea, a pediatrician and American Academy of Pediatrics spokesperson. “Instead, they need an appointment to discuss the vaccines prior to receiving them.” 

    Even though insurance will cover the vaccine, these additional doctor appointments could come with more office visit charges, copays or deductibles, O’Shea said. “This barrier is undoubtedly going to reduce uptake of vaccines.”

    Lead medical assistant Maria Teresa Diocales administers the measles, mumps and rubella (MMR) vaccine to 1-year-old at International Community Health Services, Sept. 10, 2025, in Seattle. (AP)

    Q: Why are medical professionals worried?

    A: The decision to drop multiple vaccine recommendations without new science or data alarmed public health professionals. 

    Recategorizing a vaccine as needing shared clinical decision making could send the message that some kids shouldn’t get it, O’Shea said. Organizations including the American Academy of Pediatrics and the American Medical Association continue to recommend children receive the vaccines removed from the universal recommendations guidelines.

    Physicians might find themselves having “to talk parents into what has been a necessary, recommended vaccine despite no shift in the science,” O’Shea said. 

    Plus, vaccine reminder systems that many doctors use weren’t built for this approach.

    “The electronic health record systems most practices use are built for binary decisions: this patient needs this vaccine or they don’t,” Scott said. Doctors might not be automatically prompted to offer the vaccines or plan to discuss them during a routine office visit, he said. 

    This poses the biggest problem for vaccines requiring strict timing, such as the two-dose rotavirus vaccine. Dose one is given before age 15 weeks and the series must be finished by 8 months. 

    “Any delay caused by missed prompts, extra conversations or rescheduling can mean a child ages out of eligibility entirely,” Scott said.

    Q: How will this change families’ ability to access vaccines in the future? 

    A: Doctors fear the new changes will reduce how many people get vaccines long term. We aren’t sure what insurers will do after 2026. It’s not clear that they’ll continue to cover all the formerly recommended routine vaccines. And there are other uncertainties.

    When a vaccine isn’t considered routine, some practices could stock less of it, especially if they have limited storage, Scott said.

    “That tends to push vaccination away from the usual path and toward ‘ask for it,’ which hits hardest for families without a stable medical home, families with transportation and scheduling constraints and families in underserved areas,” he said.

    It could also be harder to get these vaccines at places such as retail pharmacies, which might not be able to readily accommodate the shared clinical decision making requirement. 

    Q: How should parents navigate these changes? 

    A: Doctors recommend parents ask pediatricians what immunization schedule their practice follows. 

    The American Academy of Pediatrics produces its own recommended vaccine schedule, which, for years, aligned with the CDC’s guidelines.

    “For parents who are looking for vaccine guidance that is carefully considered, paced and timed to work with your child’s growing immune system and protecting them when they need it most, the AAP’s vaccine schedule is the best resource,” O’Shea said.

    If your pediatrician says they plan to follow the AAP schedule, you can say you’d like to follow it as well and proceed with your child’s vaccinations. 

    “Keep your child’s vaccine record current and accessible,” Scott advised. “If you’re unsure whether your child is due for something, ask for a printed immunization forecast from the practice or your state registry.” 

    PolitiFact Researcher Caryn Baird contributed to this report.

    RELATED: The CDC just sidelined these childhood vaccines. Here’s what they prevent. 

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Flu Cases Rising As New Strain Circulates In California – LAmag

    [ad_1]

    The California Department of Public Health announced the rise of a new strain of flu – one that could leave both young children and older adults at risk

    This Tuesday, the California Department of Public Health (CDPH) published a release announcing elevated levels of a new strain of influenza quickly spreading in California.

    A new strain of influenza A, H3N2 subclade K remains a higher risk to both young children and older adults, given its ability to cause severe flu complications. It has often been referred to as a “super flu,” due to the fact that it tends to last longer and become more easily transmissible to others.

    But the term “super flu” isn’t a real term, according to an article published by Stanford Medicine. Flu mutations are common, and this subclade K mutation has developed the ability to elude some of the protections the current flu vaccine provides. But health professionals still recommend that individuals receive the vaccine in order to avoid more severe health complications from this virus.

    Per the CDPH release: “Current seasonal flu vaccines remain effective at reducing severe illness and hospitalization, including the currently circulating viruses,” said Dr. Erica Pan, CDPH Director and State Public Health Officer. “It is important for families to know that flu vaccines, tests, and treatments remain widely available for all Californians and that it is not too late to get a flu vaccine. As a pediatrician, parent, and daughter, I have made sure that my own family is protected with this season’s flu vaccine.”

    This subclade K strain was the cause of the second pediatric flu-associated fatality in California this season, the CDPH release also confirmed.

    Notably, this CDPH warning follows just over a week after the CDC’s removal of the flu shot from the U.S. recommended childhood vaccine list earlier last Monday.

    [ad_2]

    Amelia Su

    Source link

  • The vaccine schedule didn’t call for ‘72 injections’

    [ad_1]

    To defend recent changes to the childhood vaccine schedule, the Trump administration compared shots for American babies with babies in an unspecified “European Country.” 

    The Jan. 5 White House graphic showed two babies, each surrounded by needles, with the text: “European Country: 11 injections. United States: 72 injections.” It cited a recent U.S. Health and Human Services report on the 2024 U.S. childhood and adolescent immunization schedule, which shows Denmark is the graphic’s “European country.”

    (Screenshot of Instagram post)

    President Donald Trump posted the same count on Truth Social after the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention announced it was reducing the number of vaccines routinely recommended to children. 

    Federal vaccine recommendations vary according to a person’s age and health circumstances. But this graphic featuring an infant explicitly refers to injections, so we focused on how many shots babies could have received under the former recommendation. 

    It was not 72.

    The comparison to Denmark is also faulty: It uses the most exaggerated count of “injections” for the U.S. while using the most conservative count for Denmark.

    No matter how you count, babies under 2 did not receive 72 vaccines 

    The CDC never recommended babies get 72 injections

    In 2024 and part of 2025, before the Trump administration’s changes, it recommended children up to age 2 get up to 12 different vaccines protecting against 16 diseases. 

    Some vaccines are administered in several doses. Seventy-two is around the number of routinely recommended doses — not injections — that could have been given over 18 years, beginning in infancy. Half of those doses are from annual flu and COVID-19 vaccines. 

    Doses rarely equal “injections.” That’s because many childhood vaccine doses can be delivered in combination vaccines, in which one syringe contains several vaccines. Other times, vaccines can be given orally, like the rotavirus vaccine, or via nasal spray, like the flu vaccine.  

    Under the 2024 schedule, a baby at the two-month appointment could receive all six recommended vaccine doses in two injections and one oral administration of drops, for example. 

    And it was possible, with maximum use of combination vaccines, for a 2-year-old to be fully vaccinated with as few as 12 injections and some oral drops — or up to 19 or 20 injections if they got their first course of COVID-19 and flu vaccines and an RSV vaccine.

    That said, not all clinics or providers carry every vaccine in their highest combination form. But even if a child got every vaccine dose separately under the former schedule, that would have resulted in 27 to 30 injections by age 2, plus some oral drops.

    Still, that many injections is unlikely. Dr. William Schaffner, Vanderbilt University infectious diseases professor, said he’s never heard of a child who got every vaccine purely through single doses.

    “Ideally, we want to use combination vaccines, because that reduces the number of shots,” said Dr. Flor Muñoz, a Baylor College of Medicine pediatric infectious disease doctor, when she spoke to PolitiFact in September 2025. 

    Even including young kids and teenagers, ‘72 injections’ is a stretch

    Let’s assume the graphic was referencing more than just babies. It’s still inaccurate

    From birth to age 10, under the previous schedule, the CDC recommended up to 30 vaccine doses. With maximum reliance on combination shots those doses could be delivered in as few as 14 injections and some oral drops. 

    A child who got an annual COVID-19 and flu vaccines, but opted for the flu nasal spray, could turn 10 having gotten 28 shots in arms plus oral drops. Even if counting all possible vaccines from birth to age 18, “72 injections” would be a stretch. That would require every single vaccine dose over 18 years be given as a separate shot. 

    Before recent changes, an 18-year-old who got all of CDC’s universally recommended vaccines, including COVID-19 and flu vaccines, would be protected against 18 diseases.

    By maximizing combination shots, and getting the shortest dosing series, it would have been possible to reach adulthood with 19 injections, and some oral drops.

    If the same teen got annual COVID-19 and flu vaccines, but opted for the flu nasal spray, that could add up to 41 shots by age 18; fewer are possible, depending on what month the person was born. 

    Denmark comparison propped up with misleading math

    The Trump administration’s injection comparison uses apples and oranges to make the U.S. count look high and Denmark’s low. 

    Both account for 18 years of vaccines, not just for babies. 

    The White House did not respond to our query about how the number of “injections” was calculated, but HHS appears to have reached the total of “72 injections” in the U.S. by counting each dose as a separate injection and including vaccines given as oral drops as “injections.” 

    For Denmark, HHS took combination vaccines into account, and counted several doses as a single injection, leading to the lowest possible total — “11 injections.”

    Those 11 shots include 18 total doses. Total doses are far lower in Denmark, which does not routinely vaccinate children against diseases like chickenpox, RSV, rotavirus, meningococcal disease or Hepatitis A or B. Denmark also does not recommend routine vaccination for children against influenza or COVID-19. 

    In short, the U.S. count assumes the highest possible number, while the Denmark count assumes the lowest. 

    Our ruling

    The Trump White House shared a graphic showing a baby in the U.S. getting 72 vaccine injections under the previous CDC recommended schedule. 

    But babies don’t get that many shots. Under the 2024 schedule, children could get from 12 to 30 shots before their second birthday depending on the use of combination vaccines and COVID-19 and flu shots. 

    Before age 10, that schedule recommended 30 to 52 doses. By using combination vaccines and flu nasal spray, however, they could be delivered in 14 to 28 injections. 

    Even as doses rise to a potential 72 for an 18-year-old, it’s unlikely a child would reach adulthood with every single dose given as a separate injection.

    We rate the claim that the U.S. childhood vaccine schedule previously called for babies to get “72 injections” False.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • What should parents do about the CDC’s new vaccine recs? We asked NC experts

    [ad_1]

    The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recently updated the U.S. Childhood vaccination schedule, reducing the number of diseases for which vaccines are universally recommended.

    Under the revised guidance, several vaccines that had been standard for all children will now instead be recommended primarily for high-risk groups or through shared clinical decision-making between families and healthcare providers, rather than automatically for every child.

    The vaccines no longer universally recommended for all children are those protecting against:

    • Rotavirus
    • Influenza 
    • COVID-19
    • Hepatitis A
    • Hepatitis B
    • Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV)
    • Meningitis

    In a statement posted Monday, American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) President Dr. Andrew D. Racine called the decision to update the vaccine schedule “ill-considered” and said it will “sow further chaos and confusion and erode confidence in immunizations.”

    “This is no way to make our country healthier,” he wrote.

    The updated schedule still recommends routine vaccination for diseases such as measles, mumps, rubella, polio, pertussis, tetanus, HPV and chickenpox for all children.

    However, the shift has presented questions about what health professionals are recommending, whether insurance will continue to cover the cost of the vaccines and whether the updates will lead to lower vaccine uptake in the state.

    Here’s what you need to know.

    Which vaccines are doctors recommending?

    Despite recent changes to the vaccine schedule, doctors are recommending that parents continue following the schedule released by the AAP, Dr. Zach Willis, a pediatric infectious disease specialist at UNC Health, told The Charlotte Observer.

    “The data that supports the recommendations for those vaccines has not changed, and there hasn’t been a significant update to the interpretation of the data,” Willis said. “The vaccine schedule is something that has been built very meticulously over the years. There is a very strong reasoning for every dose of every vaccine that’s recommended, and they’ve been tested.”

    State health officials echoed that guidance, emphasizing that the underlying science supporting childhood vaccines has not changed.

    “Vaccines remain one of the most effective means available to prevent severe illness, hospitalization and death,” a NCDHHS spokesperson told The Observer in an email. “NCDHHS recommends that clinicians continue to rely on their clinical training and professional judgment and consult information published by the American Academy of Pediatrics and the American Academy of Family Physicians when engaging in shared clinical decision-making with parents, caregivers and patients.”

    Here’s when the vaccines that are no longer universally recommended by the CDC are recommended by the AAP:

    • Rotavirus: First dose at two months, second dose at four months
    • Influenza: One or two doses annually from ages six months to six years, the one dose annually for ages seven and up
    • COVID-19: At least one dose of the 2025-2026 vaccine after six months
    • Hepatitis A: First dose at 12 months, then a second dose six months after
    • Hepatitis B: First dose at birth, second dose at one month and a third dose at six months
    • Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV): Seasonal administration during pregnancy if not previously vaccinated
    • Meningitis: Two doses anytime between the ages of 11 and 12, then a booster dose between the ages of 16 and 18

    A nurse readies a syringe during a vaccination.
    A nurse readies a syringe during a vaccination. Matt Stone/The Louisville Courier Journal Matt Stone/The Louisville Courier Journal / USA TODAY NETWORK

    Will insurance still cover the cost of vaccines?

    Yes, Willis said.

    “The new guidance put out by does not, in any way, prevent any parent or child, or any person from getting the vaccines according to the schedule,” he added.

    Willis also emphasized that federal programs, such as Medicare, Medicaid and the Vaccines for Children program will still cover the cost of vaccines, even if they’re not recommended.

    That means most people will still save hundreds of dollars on vaccines, such as COVID-19, which carries an out-of-pocket cost of more than $200 at some pharmacy chains, The Charlotte Observer reported.

    Will the updated schedule lead to lower vaccination rates?

    It could, Willis said.

    “That is certainly the concern,” said Willis. “I think that there are certainly a lot of folks who follow the vaccine recommendations very closely, but I think for the vast majority of people, they just accept the recommendations that their child’s primary care provider gives them.”

    Recent data show that vaccine uptake for certain shots has already gone down.

    N.C. Department of Health and Human Services data show just 20% of North Carolina residents have been vaccinated against the flu this season, with Mecklenburg and Wake counties at 20% and 25%, respectively. Those rates are lower than usual, as most counties are typically 30–50% vaccinated by this point, Dr. David Weber, an infectious disease specialist at UNC Health, previously told the Observer.

    “It depends obviously on age and risk factors,” he added. “It’s not surprising that older people who are at higher risk are more likely to be immunized.”

    A recent measles exposure in Gaston County, just west of Mecklenburg, also has health officials worried.

    Dr. David Wohl, an infectious disease specialist at UNC Health, previously told the Observer that vaccination rates in North Carolina are likely not high enough to prevent an outbreak.

    While the state’s overall vaccination rate is relatively high, coverage varies widely by community, Wohl said, and those gaps matter. He noted that measles is far less likely to spread when about 95% of people are vaccinated, but even small drops into the low 90s can significantly increase risk.

    In areas where MMR rates fall into the 80% range, he said, a single case can quickly ignite an outbreak, calling it “a forest fire waiting to happen.”

    What can parents do to protect their children?

    Though the vaccine schedule changes could lead to lower vaccination rates, Willis said those who are vaccinated have little to worry about.

    “I don’t think that we’re in a situation where anybody needs to live in fear,” Willis said, noting that people who are immunocompromised may need to be more cautious in public settings. “If a parent is immunocompromised themselves, or has a child who’s immunocompromised, they should talk to their specialist who manages that condition.”

    Related Stories from Raleigh News & Observer

    Evan Moore

    The Charlotte Observer

    Evan Moore is a service journalism reporter for the Charlotte Observer. He grew up in Denver, North Carolina, where he previously worked as a reporter for the Denver Citizen, and is a UNC Charlotte graduate.

    [ad_2]

    Evan Moore

    Source link

  • CDC sidelines six childhood vaccines. What do they prevent?

    [ad_1]

     

    The federal government has drastically scaled back the number of recommended childhood immunizations, sidelining six routine vaccines that have safeguarded millions from serious diseases, long-term disability, and death.

    Just three of the six immunizations the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention says it will no longer routinely recommend — against hepatitis A, hepatitis B, and rotavirus — have prevented nearly 2 million hospitalizations and more than 90,000 deaths in the past 30 years, according to the CDC’s own publications.

    Vaccines against the three diseases, as well as those against respiratory syncytial virus, meningococcal disease, flu, and COVID, are now recommended only for children at high risk of serious illness or after “shared clinical decision-making,” or consultation between doctors and parents.

    The CDC maintained its recommendations for 11 childhood vaccines: measles, mumps, and rubella; whooping cough, tetanus, and diphtheria; the bacterial disease known as Hib; pneumonia; polio; chickenpox; and human papillomavirus, or HPV.

    Federal and private insurance will still cover vaccines for the diseases the CDC no longer recommends universally, according to a Department of Health and Human Services fact sheet; parents who want to vaccinate their children against those diseases will not have to pay out-of-pocket.

    Experts on childhood disease were baffled by the change in guidance. HHS said the changes followed “a scientific review of the underlying science” and were in line with vaccination programs in other developed nations.

    HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., an anti-vaccine activist, pointed to Denmark as a model. But the schedules of most European countries are closer to the U.S. standard upended by the new guidance.

    For example, Denmark, which does not vaccinate against rotavirus, registers around 1,200 infant and toddler rotavirus hospitalizations a year. That rate, in a country of 6 million, is about the same as it was in the United States before vaccination.

    “They’re OK with having 1,200 or 1,300 hospitalized kids, which is the tip of the iceberg in terms of childhood suffering,” said Paul Offit, the director of the Vaccine Education Center at the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia and a co-inventor of a licensed rotavirus vaccine. “We weren’t. They should be trying to emulate us, not the other way around.”

    Public health officials say the new guidance puts the onus on parents to research and understand each childhood vaccine and why it is important.

    Here’s a rundown of the diseases the sidelined vaccines prevent:

    RSV. Respiratory syncytial virus is the most common cause of hospitalization for infants in the U.S.

    The respiratory virus usually spreads in fall and winter and produces cold-like symptoms, though it can be deadly for young children, causing tens of thousands of hospitalizations and hundreds of deaths a year. According to the National Foundation for Infectious Diseases, roughly 80% of children younger than 2 who are hospitalized with RSV have no identifiable risk factors. Long-awaited vaccines against the disease were introduced in 2023.

    Hepatitis A. Hepatitis A vaccination, which was phased in beginning in the late 1990s and recommended for all toddlers starting in 2006, has led to a more than 90% drop in the disease since 1996. The foodborne virus, which causes a wretched illness, continues to plague adults, particularly people who are homeless or who abuse drugs or alcohol, with a total of 1,648 cases and 85 deaths reported in 2023.

    Hepatitis B. The disease causes liver cancer, cirrhosis, and other serious illnesses and is particularly dangerous when contracted by babies and young children. The hepatitis B virus is transmitted through blood and other bodily fluids, even in microscopic amounts, and can survive on surfaces for a week. From 1990 to 2019, vaccination resulted in a 99% decline in reported cases of acute hepatitis B among children and teens. Liver cancer among American children has also plummeted as a result of universal childhood vaccination. But the hepatitis B virus is still around, with 2,000-3,000 acute cases reported annually among unvaccinated adults. More than 17,000 chronic hepatitis B diagnoses were reported in 2023. The CDC estimates about half of people infected don’t know they have it.

    Rotavirus. Before routine administration of the current rotavirus vaccines began in 2006, about 70,000 young children were hospitalized and 50 died every year from the virus. It was known as “winter vomiting syndrome,” said Sean O’Leary, a pediatrician at the University of Colorado. “It was a miserable disease that we hardly see anymore.”

    The virus is still common on surfaces that babies touch, however, and “if you lower immunization rates it will once again hospitalize children,” Offit said.

    Meningococcal vaccines. These have been required mainly for teenagers and college students, who are notably vulnerable to critical illness caused by the bacteria. About 600 to 1,000 cases of meningococcal disease are reported in the U.S. each year, but it kills more than 10% of those it sickens, and 1 in 5 survivors have permanent disabilities.

    Flu and COVID. The two respiratory viruses have each killed hundreds of children in recent years — though both tend to be much more severe in older adults. Flu is currently on the upswing in the United States, and last flu season the virus killed 289 children.

    What is shared clinical decision-making?

    Under the changes, decisions about vaccinating children against influenza, COVID, rotavirus, meningococcal disease, and hepatitis A and B will now rely on what officials call “shared clinical decision-making,” meaning families will have to consult with a health care provider to determine whether a vaccine is appropriate.

    “It means a provider should have a conversation with the patient to lay out the risks and the benefits and make a decision for that individual person,” said Lori Handy, a pediatric infectious disease specialist at the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia.

    In the past, the CDC used that term only in reference to narrow circumstances, like whether a person in a monogamous relationship needed the HPV vaccine, which prevents a sexually transmitted infection and certain cancers.

    The CDC’s new approach doesn’t line up with the science because of the proven protective benefit the vaccines have for the vast majority of the population, Handy said.

    In their report justifying the changes, HHS officials Tracy Beth Høeg and Martin Kulldorff said the U.S. vaccination system requires more safety research and more parental choice. Eroding trust in public health caused in part by an overly large vaccine schedule had led more parents to shun vaccination against major threats like measles, they said.

    The vaccines on the schedule that the CDC has altered were backed up by extensive safety research when they were evaluated and approved by the FDA.

    “They’re held to a safety standard higher than any other medical intervention that we have,” Handy said. “The value of routine recommendations is that it really helps the public understand that this has been vetted upside down and backwards in every which way.”

    Eric Ball, a pediatrician in Orange County, California, said the change in guidance will cause more confusion among parents who think it means a vaccine’s safety is in question.

    “It is critical for public health that recommendations for vaccines are very clear and concise,” Ball said. “Anything to muddy the water is just going to lead to more children getting sick.”

    Ball said that instead of focusing on a child’s individual health needs, he often has to spend limited clinic time reassuring parents that vaccines are safe. A “shared clinical decision-making” status for a vaccine has no relationship to safety concerns, but parents may think it does.

    HHS’ changes do not affect state vaccination laws and therefore should allow prudent medical practitioners to carry on as before, said Richard Hughes IV, an attorney and a George Washington University lecturer who is leading litigation against Kennedy over vaccine changes.

    “You could expect that any pediatrician is going to follow sound evidence and recommend that their patients be vaccinated,” he said. The law protects providers who follow professional care guidelines, he said, and “RSV, meningococcal, and hepatitis remain serious health threats for children in this country.”

    This article first appeared on KFF Health News.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Notorious ‘winter vomiting bug’ rising in California. A new norovirus strain could make it worse

    [ad_1]

    The dreaded norovirus — the “vomiting bug” that often causes stomach flu symptoms — is climbing again in California, and doctors warn that a new subvariant could make even more people sick this season.

    In L.A. County, concentrations of norovirus are already on the rise in wastewater, indicating increased circulation of the disease, the local Department of Public Health told the Los Angeles Times.

    Norovirus levels are increasing across California, and the rise is especially notable in the San Francisco Bay Area and L.A., according to the California Department of Public Health.

    And the rate at which norovirus tests are confirming infection is rising nationally and in the Western U.S. For the week that ended Nov. 22, the test positivity rate nationally was 11.69%, up from 8.66% two months earlier. In the West, it was even worse: 14.08%, up from 9.59%, according to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

    Norovirus is extraordinarily contagious, and is America’s leading cause of vomiting and diarrhea, according to the CDC. Outbreaks typically happen in the cooler months between November and April.

    Clouding the picture is the recent emergence of a new norovirus strain — GII.17. Such a development can result in 50% more norovirus illness than typical, the CDC says.

    “If your immune system isn’t used to something that comes around, a lot of people get infected,” said Dr. Peter Chin-Hong, an infectious diseases expert at UC San Francisco.

    During the 2024-25 winter season, GII.17 overthrew the previous dominant norovirus strain, GII.4, that had been responsible for more than half of national norovirus outbreaks over the preceding decade. The ancestor of the GII.17 strain probably came from a subvariant that triggered an outbreak in Romania in 2021, according to CDC scientists.

    GII.17 vaulted in prominence during last winter’s norovirus surge and was ultimately responsible for about 75% of outbreaks of the disease nationally.

    The strain’s emergence coincided with a particularly bad year for norovirus, one that started unusually early in October 2024, peaked earlier than normal the following January and stretched into the summer, according to CDC scientists writing in the journal Emerging Infectious Diseases.

    During the three prior seasons, when GII.4 was dominant, norovirus activity had been relatively stable, Chin-Hong said.

    Norovirus can cause substantial disruptions — as many parents know all too well. An elementary school in Massachusetts was forced to cancel all classes on Thursday and Friday because of the “high volume of stomach illness cases,” which was suspected to be driven by norovirus.

    More than 130 students at Roberts Elementary School in Medford, Mass., were absent Wednesday, and administrators said there probably wouldn’t be a “reasonable number of students and staff” to resume classes Friday. A company was hired to perform a deep clean of the school’s classrooms, doorknobs and kitchen equipment.

    Some places in California, however, aren’t seeing major norovirus activity so far this season. Statewide, while norovirus levels in wastewater are increasing, they still remain low, the California Department of Public Health said.

    There have been 32 lab-confirmed norovirus outbreaks reported to the California Department of Public Health so far this year. Last year, there were 69.

    Officials caution the numbers don’t necessarily reflect how bad norovirus is in a particular year, as many outbreaks are not lab-confirmed, and an outbreak can affect either a small or large number of people.

    Between Aug. 1 and Nov. 13, there were 153 norovirus outbreaks publicly reported nationally, according to the CDC. During the same period last year, there were 235.

    UCLA hasn’t reported an increase in the number of norovirus tests ordered, nor has it seen a significant increase in test positivity rates. Chin-Hong said he likewise hasn’t seen a big increase at UC San Francisco.

    “Things are relatively still stable clinically in California, but I think it’s just some amount of time before it comes here,” Chin-Hong said.

    In a typical year, norovirus causes 2.27 million outpatient clinic visits, mostly young children; 465,000 emergency department visits, 109,000 hospitalizations, and 900 deaths, mostly among seniors age 65 and older.

    People with severe ongoing vomiting, profound diarrhea and dehydration may need to seek medical attention to get hydration intravenously.

    “Children who are dehydrated may cry with few or no tears and be unusually sleepy or fussy,” the CDC says. Sports drinks can help with mild dehydration, but what may be more helpful are oral rehydration fluids that can be bought over the counter.

    Children under the age of 5 and adults 85 and older are most likely to need to visit an emergency room or clinic because of norovirus, and should not hesitate to seek care, experts say.

    “Everyone’s at risk, but the people who you worry about, the ones that we see in the hospital, are the very young and very old,” Chin-Hong said.

    Those at highest risk are babies, because it doesn’t take much to cause potentially serious problems. Newborns are at risk for necrotizing enterocolitis, a life-threatening inflammation of the intestine that virtually only affects new babies, according to the National Library of Medicine.

    Whereas healthy people generally clear the virus in one to three days, immune-compromised individuals can continue to have diarrhea for a long time “because their body’s immune system can’t neutralize the virus as effectively,” Chin-Hong said.

    The main way people get norovirus is by accidentally drinking water or eating food contaminated with fecal matter, or touching a contaminated surface and then placing their fingers in their mouths.

    People usually develop symptoms 12 to 48 hours after they’re exposed to the virus.

    Hand sanitizer does not work well against norovirus — meaning that proper handwashing is vital, experts say.

    People should lather their hands with soap and scrub for at least 20 seconds, including the back of their hands, between their fingers and under their nails, before rinsing and drying, the CDC says.

    One helpful way to keep track of time is to hum the “Happy Birthday” song from beginning to end twice, the CDC says. Chin-Hong says his favorite is the chorus of Kelly Clarkson’s “Since U Been Gone.”

    If you’re living with someone with norovirus, “you really have to clean surfaces and stuff if they’re touching it,” Chin-Hong said. Contamination is shockingly easy. Even just breathing out little saliva droplets on food that is later consumed by someone else can spread infection.

    Throw out food that might be contaminated with norovirus, the CDC says. Noroviruses are relatively resistant to heat and can survive temperatures as high as 145 degrees.

    Norovirus is so contagious that even just 10 viral particles are enough to cause infection. By contrast, it takes ingesting thousands of salmonella particles to get sick from that bacterium.

    People are most contagious when they are sick with norovirus — but they can still be infectious even after they feel better, the CDC says.

    The CDC advises staying home for 48 hours after infection. Some studies have even shown that “you can still spread norovirus for two weeks or more after you feel better,” according to the CDC.

    The CDC also recommends washing laundry in hot water.

    Besides schools, other places where norovirus can spread quickly are cruise ships, day-care centers and prisons, Chin-Hong said.

    The most recent norovirus outbreak on a cruise ship reported by the CDC is on the ship AIDAdiva, which set sail on Nov. 10 from Germany. Out of 2,007 passengers on board, 4.8% have reported being ill. The outbreak was first reported on Nov. 30 following stops that month at the Isle of Portland, England; Halifax, Canada; Boston; New York City; Charleston, S.C.; and Miami.

    According to CruiseMapper, the ship was set to make stops in Puerto Vallarta on Saturday, San Diego on Tuesday, Los Angeles on Wednesday, Santa Barbara on Thursday and San Francisco between Dec. 19-21.

    [ad_2]

    Rong-Gong Lin II

    Source link

  • What the Trump administration’s hepatitis B vaccine rollback means for California

    [ad_1]

    For most American infants, the hepatitis B shot comes just before their first bath, in the blur of pokes, prods and pictures that attend a 21st century hospital delivery.

    But as of this week, thousands of newborns across the U.S. will no longer receive the initial inoculation for hepatitis B — the first in a litany of childhood vaccinations and the top defense against one of the world’s deadliest cancers.

    On Dec. 5, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s powerful vaccine advisory panel voted to nix the decades-old birth-dose recommendation.

    The change was pushed by Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and his “Make America Healthy Again” movement, which has long sought to rewrite the CDC’s childhood vaccine schedule and unwind state immunization requirements for kindergarten.

    California officials have vowed to keep the state’s current guidelines in place, but the federal changes could threaten vaccine coverage by some insurers and public benefits programs, along with broader reverberations.

    “It’s a gateway,” said Jessica Malaty Rivera, an infectious disease epidemiologist in Los Angeles. “It’s not just hepatitis B — it’s chipping away at the entire schedule.”

    Democratic-led states and blue-chip insurance companies have scrambled to shore up access. California joined Hawaii, Oregon and Washington in forming the West Coast Health Alliance to maintain uniform public policy on vaccines in the face of official “mis- and dis-information.”

    “Universal hepatitis B vaccinations at birth save lives, and walking away from this science is reckless,” California Gov. Gavin Newsom said in a statement. “The Trump administration’s ideological politics continue to drive increasingly high costs — for parents, for newborns, and for our entire public-health system.”

    The issue is also already tied up in court.

    On Tuesday, the Supreme Court sent a lawsuit over New York’s vaccine rules back to the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals for review, signaling skepticism about the stringent shots-for-school requirements pioneered in California. On Friday, public health officials in Florida appeared poised to ax their schools’ hepatitis B immunization requirement, along with shots for chickenpox, a dozen strains of bacterial pneumonia and the longtime leading cause of deadly meningitis.

    Boosters of the hep B change said it replaces impersonal prescriptions with “shared clinical decision-making” about whether and how to vaccinate, while preserving the more stringent recommendation for children of infected mothers and those whose status is unknown.

    Critics say families were always free to decline the vaccine, as about 20% did nationwide in 2020, according to data published by the CDC. It’s the only shot on the schedule that children on Medicaid receive at the same rate as those with private insurance.

    Rather than improve informed consent, critics say the CDC committee’s decision and the splashy public fight leading up to it have depressed vaccination rates, even among children of infected mothers.

    “Hepatitis B is the most vulnerable vaccine in the schedule,” said Dr. Chari Cohen, president of the Hepatitis B Foundation. “The message we’re hearing from pediatricians and gynecologists is parents are making it clear that they don’t want their baby to get the birth dose, they don’t want their baby to get the vaccine.”

    Much of that vulnerability has to do with timing: The first dose is given within hours of birth, while symptoms of the disease might not show up for decades.

    “The whole Day One thing really messes with people,” Rivera said. “They think, ‘This is my perfect fresh baby and I don’t want to put anything inside of them.’ ”

    U.S. surgeon general nominee Casey Means called the universal birth dose recommendation “absolute insanity,” saying in a post on X last year that it should “make every American pause and question the healthcare system’s mandates.”

    “The disease is transmitted through needles and sex exclusively,” she said. “There is no benefit to the baby or the wider population for a child to get this vaccine who is not at risk for sexual or IV transmission. There is only risk.”

    In fact, at least half of transmission occurs from mother to child, typically at birth. A smaller percentage of babies get the disease by sharing food, nail clippers or other common household items with their fathers, grandparents or day-care teachers. Because infections are often asymptomatic, most don’t know they have the virus, and at least 15% of pregnant women in the U.S. aren’t tested for the disease, experts said.

    Infants who contract hepatitis B are overwhelmingly likely to develop chronic hepatitis, leading to liver cancer or cirrhosis in midlife. The vaccine, by contrast, is far less likely than those for flu or chickenpox to cause even minor reactions, such as fever.

    “We’ve given 50 billion doses of the hepatitis B vaccine and we’ve not seen signals that make us concerned,” said Dr. Su Wang, medical director of Viral Hepatitis Programs and the Center for Asian Health at the Cooperman Barnabas Medical Center in New Jersey, who lives with the disease.

    Still, “sex and drugs” remains a popular talking point, not only with Kennedy allies in Washington and Atlanta, but among many prominent Los Angeles pediatricians.

    “It sets up on Day One this mentality of, ‘I don’t necessarily agree with this, so what else do I not agree with?’” said Dr. Joel Warsh, a Studio City pediatrician and MAHA luminary, whose recent book “Between a Shot and a Hard Place” is aimed at vaccine-hesitant families.

    Hepatitis B also disproportionately affects immigrant communities, further stigmatizing an illness that first entered the mainstream consciousness as an early proxy for HIV infection in the 1980s, before it was fully understood.

    At the committee meeting last week, member Dr. Evelyn Griffin called illegal immigration the “elephant in the room” in the birth dose debate.

    The move comes as post-pandemic wellness culture has supercharged vaccine hesitancy, expanding objections from a long-debunked link between the measles-mumps-rubella vaccine and autism to a more generalized, equally false belief that “healthy” children who eat whole foods and play outside are unlikely to get sick from vaccine-preventable diseases and, if they do, can be treated with “natural” remedies such as beef tallow and cod liver oil.

    “It’s about your quality of life, it’s about what you put in your body, it’s about your wellness journey — we have debunked this before,” Rivera said. “This is eugenics.”

    Across Southern California, pediatricians, preschool teachers and public health experts say they’ve seen a surge in families seeking to prune certain shots from the schedule and many delay others based on “individualized risk.” The trend has spawned a cottage industry of e-books, Zoom workshops by “vaccine friendly” doctors offering alternative schedules, bespoke inoculations and post-vaccine detox regimens.

    CDC data show state exemptions for kindergarten vaccines have surged since the height of the COVID-19 pandemic, with about 5% of schoolchildren in Georgia, Florida and Ohio, more than 6% in Pennsylvania and nearly 7% in Michigan waved out of the requirement last year.

    In Alaska and Arizona, those numbers topped 9%. In Idaho, 1 in 6 kindergartners are exempt.

    California is one of four states — alongside New York, Connecticut and Maine — with no religious or personal-belief exemptions for school vaccines.

    It is also among at least 20 states that have committed to keep the hepatitis B birth dose for babies on public insurance, which covers about half of American children. It is not clear whether the revised recommendation will affect government coverage of the vaccine in other states.

    Experts warn that the success of the birth-dose reversal over near-universal objection from the medical establishment puts the entire pediatric vaccination schedule up for grabs, and threatens the school-based rules that enforce it.

    Ongoing measles outbreaks in Texas and elsewhere that have killed three and sickened close to 2,000 show the risks of rolling back requirements, experts said.

    Hepatitis is not nearly as contagious as measles, which can linger in the air for about two hours. But it’s still fairly easy to pick up, and devastating to those who contract it, experts said.

    “These decisions happening today are going to have terrible residual effects later,” said Rivera, the L.A. epidemiologist. “I can’t imagine being a new mom having to navigate this.”

    [ad_2]

    Sonja Sharp

    Source link

  • WHO Rebuts CDC: No Link Between Vaccines and Autism

    [ad_1]

    A new analysis from experts gathered by the World Health Organization found no link between vaccines and autism – countering a recently revised stance by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

    “The conclusion reaffirms WHO’s position that childhood vaccines do not cause autism,” the organization said Thursday in a statement.

    The analysis comes after the CDC under President Donald Trump last month changed its long-held stance that vaccines don’t cause autism, now saying on its website that the consensus is “not an evidence-based claim because studies have not ruled out the possibility that infant vaccines cause autism.”

    It adds that “studies supporting a link have been ignored by health authorities” and noted that the Department of Health and Human Services has “launched a comprehensive assessment of the causes of autism, including investigations on plausible biologic mechanisms and potential causal links.” HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. told The New York Times that he personally instructed the CDC to make the website change.

    Sign Up for U.S. News Decision Points

    Your trusted source for breaking down the latest news from Washington and beyond, delivered weekdays.

    Sign up to receive the latest updates from U.S. News & World Report and our trusted partners and sponsors. By clicking submit, you are agreeing to our Terms and Conditions & Privacy Policy.

    Public health experts and groups strongly rejected the change, with the American Medical Association saying at the time that it “is deeply concerned that perpetuating misleading claims on vaccines will lead to further confusion, distrust and ultimately dangerous consequences for individuals and public health.”

    WHO’s Global Advisory Committee on Vaccine Safety analysis added to the chorus of objections in reaffirming its previous conclusions from 2002, 2004 and 2012 that vaccines do not cause autism.

    “WHO advises all national authorities to rely on the latest science and ensure vaccine policies are grounded in the strongest available evidence,” the organization said.

    The CDC did not respond to a request for comment on the analysis.

    What Did the WHO Panel Analyze?

    The committee of independent, international experts looked at 31 studies published between January 2010 and August 2025 that included data from multiple countries.

    It found that the data “strongly supports the positive safety profile of vaccines used during childhood and pregnancy, and confirms the absence of a causal link with (autism spectrum disorders).”

    The panel also analyzed the potential health risks associated with vaccines with aluminum adjuvants, which Kennedy has objected to. Some vaccines use small amounts of aluminum adjuvants to boost the body’s immune response.

    The experts reviewed studies conducted from 1999 through 2023 as well as a recent study of children born in Denmark that Kennedy has demanded be retracted. They found no association between autism and aluminum adjuvants in vaccines.

    What Has the CDC Said About Vaccines and Autism?

    The CDC has long said that vaccines do not cause autism. But Kennedy and the Trump administration have shifted that position in recent months.

    The splashiest development by far is the change to the CDC page on vaccines and autism. It prompted backlash from GOP Sen. Bill Cassidy of Louisiana, who voted for Kennedy’s confirmation after gaining several commitments from him, including one to not remove language on the CDC website pointing out that vaccines do not cause autism.

    But the CDC found a way around that promise by adding an asterisk to the page’s headline: “Vaccines do not cause autism.”

    The note at the bottom of the page says that the header “has not been removed due to an agreement with the chair of the U.S. Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee that it would remain on the CDC website.”

    But Cassidy said that vaccines protecting against childhood diseases are safe and don’t cause autism, and “any statement to the contrary is wrong, irresponsible and actively makes Americans sicker.”

    “What parents need to hear right now is vaccines for measles, polio, hepatitis B and other childhood diseases are safe and effective and will not cause autism,” Cassidy said.

    [ad_2]

    Cecelia Smith-Schoenwalder

    Source link

  • Fact-checking CDC vaccine panel on baby hepatitis B shots

    [ad_1]

    Since roughly 1991, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has recommended all babies get a dose of the hepatitis B vaccine at birth. The CDC committee that helps set vaccine policy voted Dec. 5 to overturn that decadeslong policy.  

    The Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices’ new recommendations say mothers who tested negative for hepatitis B should discuss the need for the vaccine with their doctors. For babies who do not receive a birth dose, the committee suggested the initial vaccine dose be given “no earlier than 2 months of age.”

    The committee is composed of members hand-picked by Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., an anti-vaccine advocate who in June fired all 17 of the prior panel’s members.

    Here are four fact-checkable moments that stood out from ACIP’s Dec. 4 and 5 discussion leading up to the vote:

    Many people are unaware they have hepatitis B

    Several ACIP committee members and health administrators questioned the need for vaccination among certain children who they described as “low-risk” for hepatitis B exposure.

    But it can be hard to know a child’s exposure risk. 

    Hepatitis B is transmitted through bodily fluids like blood, semen and vaginal fluids. But it is a highly infectious and tough virus that can live on surfaces for up to a week. Small amounts of dried blood on innocuous household items like nail clippers, razors or toothbrushes could be enough.

    Hepatitis B infection is stealthy. It can be asymptomatic, sometimes for years. The CDC estimates about 640,000 adults have a chronic infection, but about half of them do not know they are infected and contagious.

    Even if a pregnant mother tests negative for the hepatitis B virus, her newborn can come in contact with it in other ways and through other people. Before the vaccine became recommended universally at birth, only around half of children under 10 who were infected with hepatitis B contracted it from their mothers during birth.

    Since many people are entirely unaware of their infections, it can be hard to know if a person is at elevated risk or resides in a community with infected individuals.

    A box of hepatitis B vaccine is displayed at a CVS Pharmacy, Sept. 9, 2025, in Miami. (AP)

    Vaccinations are to protect babies, who are most vulnerable to hepatitis B

    Some ACIP members said that vaccinating all babies against hepatitis B at birth mainly protected other, higher risk people.

    That’s misleading. Vaccination at birth aims primarily to protect newborns, who are particularly vulnerable to hepatitis B. 

    The hepatitis B virus attacks the liver. Infected infants have a 90% chance of developing the disease’s more dangerous chronic form. A quarter of those babies will go on to die prematurely from the disease when they become adults.

    Untreated, chronic hepatitis B infections can cause cirrhosis and death. It is also one of the leading causes of liver cancer. Patients can seek treatments to reduce the virus’ worst effects. But there is no cure.

    “We used to have 18,000 or 20,000 kids a year being born with this, a quarter of them going on to have liver cancer,” said Dr. James Campbell, pediatric infectious disease doctor at the University of Maryland. “We now have almost none.”

    Infection rates are low because the decades-old hep B vaccination strategy was working

    “This disease has become a victim of the vaccine,” said Dr. H. Cody Meissner, a committee member who voted against changing the recommendations. “We’re seeing disease rates go down because of the effectiveness of the vaccine.”

    Meissner is right that hepatitis B cases dropped dramatically following the introduction of birth-dose vaccination.  

    The hepatitis B vaccine uses proteins from the surface of the hepatitis B virus to provoke an immune response that gives the body a defense against future infection.

    Before the vaccine, around 200,000 to 300,000 people were infected with hepatitis B each year, including about 20,000 children.

    Since hepatitis B vaccines began being universally administered to babies, overall cases are down to around 14,000 annually. The change is especially dramatic among young people. In 2022, the CDC reported 252 new chronic hepatitis B infections among people up to age 19, or 0.4 out of every 100,000 kids.

    “It’s a mistake to say that because we’re not seeing much disease, we can alter the roots or the frequency or the schedule for administration,” Meissner said. “Because we will see hepatitis B infections come back.”

    Many countries vaccinate for hepatitis B at birth; the U.S. is not an outlier

    Committee members repeatedly compared the United States’ guidance with other countries, including Denmark, as part of the rationale for walking back the universal recommendation to provide a hepatitis B vaccine dose at birth.

    The U.S. is not a global outlier in recommending hepatitis B vaccines for newborns. In September 2025, the CDC reported that “of the 194 WHO member states, 116 countries recommend universal hepatitis B birth dose vaccination to all newborns.”

    Hepatitis B vaccine birth dose vaccination policy by county as of September 2025. (U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention)

    Denmark’s standard vaccination schedule includes vaccines protecting against 10 diseases, but hepatitis B is not one of them. Denmark recommends hepatitis B vaccines only for babies whose mothers are infected with the virus, said the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control. 

    Unlike Denmark, the U.S. does not have a national health care system, making it harder for Americans to access regular prenatal care and track patient records across doctors. The U.S. also has lower rates of prenatal screening for hepatitis B.

    RELATED: Hepatitis B vaccine Q&A: Why do babies need the shot?

    RELATED: RFK Jr. wants to delay the hepatitis B vaccine. Here’s what parents need to know.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • California braces for early, sharper flu season as virus mutation outpaces vaccine, experts say

    [ad_1]

    California could see an early start to the annual flu season, as a combination of low vaccination rates and late mutations to the virus may leave the state particularly exposed to transmission, health experts say.

    Already, there are warning signs. Los Angeles County recently reported its first flu death of the season, and other nations are reporting record-breaking or powerful, earlier-than-expected flu seasons.

    Typically, flu picks up right after Christmas and into the New Year, but Dr. Elizabeth Hudson, regional physician chief of infectious diseases at Kaiser Permanente Southern California, said she expects increases in viral activity perhaps over the next two to three weeks.

    “We’re expecting an early and likely sharp start to the flu season,” Hudson said.

    Last year’s flu season was the worst California had seen in years, and it’s not usual for there to be back-to-back bad flu seasons. But a combination of a decline in flu vaccination rates and a “souped-up mutant” is particularly concerning this year, according to Dr. Peter Chin-Hong, an infectious diseases expert at UC San Francisco.

    “That may translate into more people getting infected. And as more people get infected, a proportion of them will go to the hospital,” Chin-Hong said.

    The timing of this new flu subvariant — called H3N2 subclade K — is particularly problematic. It emerged toward the end of the summer, long after health officials had already determined how to formulate this fall’s flu vaccine, a decision that had to be made in February.

    H3N2 subclade K seems to be starting to dominate in Japan and Britain, Hudson said.

    “It looks like a bit of a mismatch between the seasonal flu vaccine strains” and the new subvariant, Hudson said.

    It remains unclear whether subclade K will reduce the effectiveness of this year’s flu shot.

    In California and the rest of the U.S., “things are quiet, but I think it’s just a calm before the storm,” Chin-Hong said. “From what we see in the U.K. and Japan, a lot more people are getting flu earlier.”

    Chin-Hong noted that subclade K is not that much different than the strains this year’s flu vaccines were designed against. And he noted data recently released in Britain that showed this season’s vaccines were still effective against hospitalization.

    According to the British government, vaccinated children were 70% to 75% less likely to need hospital care, and adults were 30% to 40% less likely. Flu vaccine effectiveness is typically between 30% to 60%, and tends to be more effective in younger people, the British government said.

    Even if there is some degree of mismatch between the vaccine and circulating strains, “the flu vaccine still provides protection against severe illness, including hospitalizations,” according to the Los Angeles County Department of Public Health.

    “Public Health strongly encourages everyone who has not received the flu vaccine yet this year to receive it now, especially before gathering with loved ones during the holidays,” the department said in a statement.

    But “while mismatched vaccines may still provide protection, enhanced genetic, antigenic and epidemiological … monitoring are warranted to inform risk assessment and response,” according to scientists writing in the Journal of the Assn. of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Canada.

    Because the vaccine is not a perfect match for the latest mutated flu strain, Chin-Hong said getting antiviral medication like Tamiflu to infected patients may be especially important this year, even for those who are vaccinated. That’s especially true for the most vulnerable, which include the very young and very old.

    “But that means you need to get diagnosed earlier,” Chin-Hong said. Drugs like Tamiflu work best when started within one to two days after flu symptoms begin, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention says.

    There are now at-home flu testing kits that are widely available for sale for people who are showing signs of illness.

    Also worrying is how the flu has surged in other countries.

    Australia’s flu season came earlier this year and was more severe than usual. The Royal Australian College of General Practitioners said that nation saw a record flu season, with more than 410,000 lab-confirmed cases, up from the prior all-time high of 365,000 that were reported last year.

    “This is not a record we want to be breaking,” Dr. Michael Wright, president of the physician’s group, said.

    Hudson noted Australia’s flu season was “particularly hard on children” this year.

    L.A. County health officials cautioned that Australia’s experience isn’t a solid predictor of what happens locally.

    “It is difficult to predict what will happen in the United States and Los Angeles, as the severity of the flu season depends on multiple factors including circulating strains, pre-existing immunity, vaccine uptake, and the overall health of the population,” the L.A. County Department of Public Health said.

    The new strain has also thrown a wrench in things. As Australia’s flu season was ending, “this new mutation came up, which kind of ignited flu in Japan and the U.K., and other parts of Europe and Asia,” Chin-Hong said.

    On Friday, Japan reportedly issued a national alert with flu cases surging and hospitalizations increasing, especially among children and the elderly, accompanied by a sharp rise in school and class closures. The Japanese newspaper Asahi Shimbun said children ages 1 through 9 and adults 80 and up were among the hardest-hit groups.

    Taiwanese health officials warned of the possibility of a second peak in flu this year, according to the Central News Agency. There was already a peak in late September and early October — a month earlier than normal — and officials are warning about an uptick in flu cases starting in December and then peaking around the Lunar New Year on Feb. 17.

    Taiwanese officials said 95% of patients with severe flu symptoms had not been recently vaccinated.

    British health officials this month issued a “flu jab SOS,” as an early wave struck the nation. Flu cases are “already triple what they were this time last year,” Public Health Minister Ashley Dalton said in a statement.

    In England, outside of pandemic years, this fall marked the earliest start to the flu season since 2003-04, scientists said in the journal Eurosurveillance.

    “We have to brace ourselves for another year of more cases of flu,” Chin-Hong said.

    One major concern has been declining flu vaccination rates — a trend seen in both Australia and the United States.

    In Australia, only 25.7% of children age 6 months to 5 years were vaccinated against flu in 2025, the lowest rate since 2021. Among seniors age 65 and up, 60.5% were vaccinated, the lowest rate since 2020.

    Australian health officials are promoting free flu vaccinations for children that don’t require an injection, but are administered by nasal spray.

    “We must boost vaccination rates,” Wright said.

    In the U.S., officials recommend the annual flu vaccine for everyone age 6 months and up. Those age 65 and up are eligible for a higher-dose version, and kids and adults between age 2 and age 49 are eligible to get vaccinated via the FluMist nasal spray, rather than a needle injection.

    Officials this year began allowing people to order FluMist to be mailed to them at home.

    Besides getting vaccinated, other ways to protect yourself against the flu include washing your hands frequently, avoiding sick people and wearing a mask in higher-risk indoor settings, such as while in the airport and on a plane.

    Healthy high-risk people, such as older individuals, can be prescribed antiviral drugs like Tamiflu if another household member has the flu, Chin-Hong said.

    Doctors are especially concerned about babies, toddlers and young children up to age 5.

    “Those are the kids that are the most vulnerable if they get any kind of a respiratory illness. It can really go badly for them, and they can end up extraordinarily ill,” Hudson said.

    In the United States, just 49.2% of children had gotten a flu shot as of late April, lower than the 53.4% who had done so at the same point the previous season, according to preliminary national survey results. Both figures are well below the final flu vaccination rate for eligible children during the 2019-20 season, which was 63.7%.

    Among adults, 46.7% had gotten their flu shot as of late April, slightly down from the 47.4% at the same point last season, according to the preliminary survey results, which are the most recent data available.

    “Before the COVID-19 pandemic, flu vaccination coverage had been slowly increasing; downturns in coverage occurred during and after the pandemic. Flu vaccination levels have not rebounded to pre-pandemic levels,” according to the CDC.

    The disparaging of vaccinations by federal health officials, led by the vaccine-skeptic secretary of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Robert F. Kennedy Jr., has not helped improve immunization rates, health experts say. Kennedy told the New York Times on Thursday that he personally directed the CDC to change its website to abandon its position that vaccines do not cause autism.

    Mainstream health experts and former CDC officials denounced the change. “Extensive scientific evidence shows vaccines do not cause autism,” wrote Daniel Jernigan, Demetre Daskalakis and Debra Houry, all former top officials at the CDC, in an op-ed to MS NOW.

    “CDC has been updated to cause chaos without scientific basis. Do not trust this agency,” Daskalakis, former director of the CDC’s National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, added on social media. “This is a national embarrassment.”

    State health officials from California, Washington, Oregon and Hawaii on Friday called the new claims on the CDC website inaccurate and said there are decades of “high quality evidence that vaccines are not linked to autism.”

    “Over 40 high-quality studies involving more than 5.6 million children have found no link between any routine childhood vaccine and autism,” the L.A. County Department of Public Health said Friday. “The increase in autism diagnoses reflects improved screening, broader diagnostic criteria, and greater awareness, not a link to vaccines.”

    Hudson said it’s important to get evidence-based information on the flu vaccines.

    “Vaccines save lives. The flu vaccine in particular saves lives,” Hudson said.

    [ad_2]

    Rong-Gong Lin II

    Source link

  • Babies who drank ByHeart formula got sick months before botulism outbreak, parents say

    [ad_1]

    As health officials investigate more than 30 cases of infant botulism linked to ByHeart baby formula since August, parents who say their children were sickened with the same illness months before the current outbreak are demanding answers, too.

    California public health officials confirmed late Friday that six babies in that state who consumed ByHeart formula were treated for botulism between November 2024 and June 2025, up to nine months before the outbreak that has sickened at least 31 babies in 15 states.

    At the time, there was “not enough evidence to immediately suspect a common source,” the California Department of Public Health said in a statement.

    Even now, “we cannot connect any pre-August 1 cases to the current outbreak,” officials said.

    Parents of at least five babies said that their infants were treated for the rare and potentially deadly disease after drinking ByHeart formula in late 2024 and early 2025, according to reports shared with The Associated Press by Bill Marler, a Seattle food safety lawyer representing the families.

    Amy Mazziotti, 43, of Burbank, California, said her then-5-month-old son, Hank, fell ill and was treated for botulism in March, weeks after he began drinking bottles filled with ByHeart formula.

    Katie Connolly, 37, of Lafayette, California, said her daughter, M.C., then 8 months old, was hospitalized in April and treated for botulism after being fed ByHeart formula in hopes of helping the baby sleep.

    For months, neither mother had any idea where the infections could have originated. Such illnesses in babies typically are caused by spores spread in the environment or by contaminated honey.

    Then ByHeart recalled all of its products nationwide on Nov. 11 in connection with growing cases of infant botulism.

    As soon as she heard it was ByHeart, Mazziotti said she thought: “This cannot be a coincidence.”

    ByHeart officials this week confirmed that laboratory tests of previously unopened formula found that some samples were contaminated with the type of bacteria that leads to infant botulism.

    Marler said at least three other cases that predate the outbreak involved babies who drank ByHeart and were treated for botulism, according to their families. One consumed ByHeart formula in December 2024. The other two were sickened later in the spring, he said.

    An official with the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention said federal investigators were aware of reports of earlier illnesses but that efforts are focused now on understanding the unusual surge of dozens of infections documented since Aug. 1.

    “That doesn’t mean that they’re not necessarily part of this,” said Dr. Jennifer Cope, a CDC scientist leading the probe. “It’s just that right now, we’re focusing on this large increase.”

    Because so much time has passed and because parents of babies who got sick earlier may not have recorded lot numbers of product or kept empty cans of formula, “it will make it harder to definitively link them” to the outbreak, Cope said.

    Connolly said it feels like her daughter has been forgotten.

    “What I want to know is why did the cases beginning in August flag an investigation, but the cases that began in March did not?” Connolly said.

    Cope and other health officials said the strong signal connecting ByHeart to infant botulism cases only became apparent in recent weeks.

    Before this outbreak, no powdered infant formula in the U.S. had tested positive for the type of bacteria that leads to botulism, California health officials said. The number of cases also were within an expected range. A test of a can of open formula fed to a sick baby in the spring did not detect the bacterium.

    Then, beginning in August and through October, more cases were identified on the East Coast involving a type of toxin rarely detected in the region, officials said. More cases were seen in very young infants and more cases involved ByHeart formula, which accounts for less than 1 percent of infant formula sold in the U.S.

    Earlier this month, after a sample from a can of ByHeart formula fed to a sick infant tested positive for the germ that leads to illness, officials notified the CDC, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and the public.

    Less than 200 cases of infant botulism are reported in the U.S. each year. The disease is caused when babies ingest spores that germinate in the gut and produce a toxin. The bacterium that leads to illness is ubiquitous in the environment, including soil and water, so the source is often unknown.

    Officials at the California Infant Botulism Treatment and Prevention Program track reports of botulism and the distribution of the only treatment for the illness, an IV medication called BabyBIG.

    Outside food safety experts said the CDC should count earlier cases as part of the outbreak if babies consumed ByHeart formula and were treated for botulism.

    “Absolutely, yes, they should be included,” said Frank Yiannas, former deputy commissioner for food policy and response at the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. “Why wouldn’t they be included?”

    Sandra Eskin, chief executive of STOP Foodborne Illness, an advocacy group, agreed.

    “This outbreak is traumatic for parents,” she said. “They may have fed their newborns and infants a product they assumed was safe. And now they’re dealing with hospitalization and serious illness of their babies.”

    Connolly and Mazziotti said their babies are improving, though they still have some lingering effects. Botulism causes symptoms that include constipation, poor feeding, head and limb weakness and other problems.

    After months of uncertainty about the potential cause of the infection, Connolly said she “became completely obsessed” with the link to ByHeart formula. Now, she just wants answers.

    “We deserve to know the data that can help us understand how our babies got sick,” she said.

    The Associated Press Health and Science Department receives support from the Howard Hughes Medical Institute’s Department of Science Education and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. The AP is solely responsible for all content.

    [ad_2]

    Jonel Aleccia

    Source link

  • RFK Jr. breaks his promises about the CDC on vaccines and autism

    [ad_1]

    Before voting to confirm Robert F. Kennedy Jr. as the secretary of Health and Human Services (HHS), Sen. Bill Cassidy (R–La.) stated on the floor of the Senate that RFK Jr. had promised him that “he would work within the current vaccine approval and safety monitoring systems, and not establish parallel systems. If confirmed, he will maintain the Centers for Disease Control [CDC] and Prevention’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices without changes. CDC will not remove statements on their website pointing out that vaccines do not cause autism.”

    Every one of the main promises made to Cassidy has been broken. Eschewing the usual system of consultations with outside independent vaccine experts, RFK Jr. announced on X in May that “as of today the COVID vaccine for healthy children and healthy pregnant women has been removed from the CDC recommended immunization schedule.” This announcement makes it harder for expectant mothers to access the vaccines because some insurance companies are less likely to pay for them.

    In their lawsuit in response to RFK Jr.’s announcement, the American Academy of Pediatrics, the American College of Physicians, and the American Public Health Association argued that the secretary’s goal is “to undermine trust in vaccines and reduce the rate of vaccinations in this country.”

    What about his promise to maintain the CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices without changes? Nope. RFK Jr. fired all of the vaccine experts and loaded up the committee with anti-vaccination appointees.

    Finally, there is RFK Jr.’s promise that the CDC will not remove statements on its website pointing out that vaccines do not cause autism. As of Wednesday, the CDC website states:

    • The claim “vaccines do not cause autism” is not an evidence-based claim because studies have not ruled out the possibility that infant vaccines cause autism.
    • Studies supporting a link have been ignored by health authorities.
    • HHS has launched a comprehensive assessment of the causes of autism, including investigations on plausible biologic mechanisms and potential causal links.

    After making these statements at the top of the webpage, the CDC website maintains a headline with an asterisk.

    A screenshot from the CDC website that says "Vaccines do not cause autism"
    cdc.gov

    Why the asterisk? A note at the bottom of the page explains:

    The header “Vaccines do not cause autism” has not been removed due to an agreement with the chair of the U.S. Senate Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions Committee that it would remain on the CDC website.

    These changes are not merely dishonest; they are dangerous. All three of the new claims at the top of the CDC website are specious.

    First, evidence accumulated over numerous studies, including studies with millions of children, has found no link between vaccinations and autism.

    Second, in support of this claim that studies suggesting a link are ignored, the CDC gestures at reviews by the HHS’s own Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ). Scrounging through them for something that might suggest harm, RFK Jr.’s team found a minor note in a 2021 AHRQ report that observed the current evidence for childhood Tdap (Tetanus, diphtheria, pertussis) vaccination is “insufficient to support or reject a causal relationship between those vaccines and autism.”

    The report found that with respect to vaccines recommended for children and adolescents, “we found either no new evidence of increased risk for key adverse events with varied [strength of evidence] or insufficient evidence.” The critical question is: “insufficient evidence” for what? The report explains: “There remains insufficient evidence to draw conclusions about some rare potential adverse events [emphasis added].” Certainly, RFK Jr.’s alleged “autism epidemic” caused by vaccines would not count among “rare potential adverse events.”

    It is worth noting that the cited 2021 AHRQ report is peppered throughout with findings that vaccines do not cause autism. The new CDC site also fails to mention that the report observed that prenatal Tdap vaccination is not associated with a higher risk of autism in children.

    Meanwhile, as a result of falling Tdap vaccination rates, the number of American children infected with whooping cough (pertussis) is surging.

    What about the third claim that HHS has launched a “comprehensive assessment of the causes of autism”? In April, RFK Jr. appointed anti-vaccination stalwart David Geier to head up that assessment. As I noted at the time, “Geier will doubtlessly and transparently get the answers that our new secretary of Health and Human Services thinks he already knows.” In September, RFK Jr. announced the dubious finding that taking the painkiller Tylenol during pregnancy was associated with a higher risk of autism in children.

    “We are appalled to find that the content on the CDC webpage ‘Autism and Vaccines’ has been changed and distorted,” declares the Autism Science Foundation in a statement, “and is now filled with anti-vaccine rhetoric and outright lies about vaccines and autism.”

    That’s correct. This isn’t what the Senate—or the American people—were promised.

    [ad_2]

    Ronald Bailey

    Source link

  • What to know about the CDC’s baseless new guidance on autism

    [ad_1]

    The rewriting of a page on the CDC’s website to assert the false claim that vaccines may cause autism sparked a torrent of anger and anguish from doctors, scientists, and parents who say Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. is wrecking the credibility of an agency they’ve long relied on for unbiased scientific evidence.

    Many scientists and public health officials fear that the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s website, which now baselessly claims that health authorities previously ignored evidence of a vaccine-autism link, foreshadows a larger, dangerous attack on childhood vaccination.

    “This isn’t over,” said Helen Tager-Flusberg, a professor emerita of psychology and brain science at Boston University. She noted that Kennedy hired several longtime anti-vaccine activists and researchers to review vaccine safety at the CDC. Their study is due soon, she said.

    “They’re massaging the data, and the outcome is going to be, ‘We will show you that vaccines do cause autism,’” said Tager-Flusberg, who leads an advocacy group of more than 320 autism scientists concerned about Kennedy’s actions.

    Kennedy’s handpicked vaccine advisory committee is set to meet next month to discuss whether to abandon recommendations that babies receive a dose of the hepatitis B vaccine within hours of birth and make other changes to the CDC-approved vaccination schedule. Kennedy has claimed — falsely, scientists say — that vaccine ingredients cause conditions like asthma and peanut allergies, in addition to autism.

    The revised CDC webpage will be used to support efforts to ditch most childhood vaccines, said Angela Rasmussen, a virologist at the University of Saskatchewan and co-editor-in-chief of the journal Vaccine. “It will be cited as evidence, even though it’s completely invented,” she said.

    The website was altered by HHS, according to one CDC official who spoke on condition of anonymity. The CDC’s developmental disability group was not asked for input on the website changes, said Abigail Tighe, executive director of the National Public Health Coalition, a group that includes current and former staffers at the CDC and HHS.

    Scientists ridiculed the site’s declaration that studies “have not ruled out the possibility that infant vaccines cause autism.” While upward of 25 large studies have shown no link between vaccines and autism, it is scientifically impossible to prove a negative, said David Mandell, director of the Center for Autism Research at Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia.

    The webpage’s new statement that “studies supporting a link have been ignored by health authorities” apparently refers to work by vaccine opponent David Geier and his father, Mark, who died in March, Mandell said. Their research has been widely repudiated and even ridiculed. David Geier is one of the outside experts Kennedy hired to review safety data at the CDC.

    Asked for evidence that scientists had suppressed studies showing a link, HHS spokesperson Andrew Nixon pointed to older reports, some of which called for more study of a possible link. Asked for a specific study showing a link, Nixon did not respond.

    Expert reaction

    Infectious disease experts, pediatricians, and public health officials condemned the alteration of the CDC website. Although Kennedy has made no secret of his disdain for established science, the change came as a gut punch because the CDC has always dealt in unbiased scientific information, they said.

    Kennedy and his “nihilistic Dark Age compatriots have transformed the CDC into an organ of anti-vaccine propaganda,” said Amesh Adalja, a senior scholar at the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security.

    “On the one hand, it’s not surprising,” said Sean O’Leary, a professor of pediatrics and infectious disease at the University of Colorado. “On the other hand, it’s an inflection point, where they are clearly using the CDC as an apparatus to spread lies.”

    “The CDC website has been lobotomized,” Atul Gawande, an author and a surgeon at Brigham and Women’s Hospital, told KFF Health News.

    CDC “is now a zombie organization,” said Demetre Daskalakis, former director of the National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases at the CDC. The agency has lost about a third of its staff this year. Entire divisions have been gutted and its leadership fired or forced to resign.

    Kennedy has been “going from evidence-based decision-making to decision-based evidence making,” Daniel Jernigan, former director of the CDC’s National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, said at a news briefing Nov. 19. With Kennedy and his team, terminology including “radical transparency” and “gold-standard science” has been “turned on its head,” he said.

    Cassidy goes quiet

    The new webpage seemed to openly taunt Sen. Bill Cassidy (R-La.), a physician who chairs the Senate Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions Committee. Cassidy cast the tie-breaking vote in committee for Kennedy’s confirmation after saying he had secured an agreement that the longtime anti-vaccine activist wouldn’t make significant changes to the CDC’s vaccine policy once in office.

    The agreement included a promise, he said, that the CDC would not remove statements on its website stating that vaccines do not cause autism.

    The new autism page is still headed with the statement “Vaccines do not cause Autism,” but with an asterisk linked to a notice that the phrase was retained on the site only “due to an agreement” with Cassidy. The rest of the page contradicts the header.

    “What Kennedy has done to the CDC’s website and to the American people makes Sen. Cassidy into a total and absolute fool,” said Mark Rosenberg, a former CDC official and assistant surgeon general.

    On Nov. 19 at the Capitol, before the edits were made to the CDC website, Cassidy answered several unrelated questions from reporters but ended the conversation when he was asked about the possibility Kennedy’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices might recommend against a newborn dose of the hepatitis B vaccine.

    “I got to go in,” he said, before walking into a hearing room without responding.

    Cassidy has expressed dismay about the vaccine advisory committee’s actions but has avoided criticizing Kennedy directly or acknowledging that the secretary has breached commitments he made before his confirmation vote. Cassidy has said Kennedy also promised to maintain the childhood immunization schedule before being confirmed.

    The senator criticized the CDC website edits in a Nov. 20 post on X, although he did not mention Kennedy.

    “What parents need to hear right now is vaccines for measles, polio, hepatitis B and other childhood diseases are safe and effective and will not cause autism,” he said in the post. “Any statement to the contrary is wrong, irresponsible, and actively makes Americans sicker.”

    Leading autism research and support groups, including the Autism Science Foundation, the Autism Society of America, and the Autism Self Advocacy Network, issued statements condemning the website.

    “The CDC’s web page used to be about how vaccines do not cause autism. Yesterday, they changed it,” ASAN said in a statement. “It says that there is some proof that vaccines might cause autism. It says that people in charge of public health have been ignoring this proof. These are lies.”

    What the research shows

    Parents often notice symptoms of autism in a child’s second year, which happens to follow multiple vaccinations. “That is the natural history of autism symptoms,” said Tager-Flusberg. “But in their minds, they had the perfect child who suddenly has been taken from them, and they are looking for an external reason.”

    When speculation about a link between autism and the measles, mumps, and rubella vaccine or vaccines containing the mercury-based preservative thimerosal surfaced around 2000, “scientists didn’t dismiss them out of hand,” said Tager-Flusberg, who has researched autism since the 1970s. “We were shocked, and we felt the important thing to do was to figure out how to quickly investigate.”

    Since then, studies have clearly established that autism occurs as a result of genetics or fetal development. Although knowledge gaps persist, studies have shown that premature birth, older parents, viral infections, and the use of certain drugs during pregnancy — though not Tylenol, evidence so far indicates — are linked to increased autism risk.

    But other than the reams of data showing the health risks of smoking, there are few examples of science more definitive than the many worldwide studies that “have failed to demonstrate that vaccines cause autism,” said Bruce Gellin, former director of the National Vaccine Program Office.

    The edits to the CDC website and other actions by Kennedy’s HHS will shake confidence in vaccines and lead to more disease, said Jesse Goodman, a former FDA chief scientist and now a professor at Georgetown University.

    This opinion was echoed by Alison Singer, the mother of an autistic adult and a co-founder of the Autism Science Foundation. “If you’re a new mom and not aware of the last 30 years of research, you might say, ‘The government says we need to study whether vaccines cause autism. Maybe I’ll wait and not vaccinate until we know,’” she said.

    The CDC website misleads parents, puts children at risk, and draws resources away from promising leads, said Paul Offit, director of the Vaccine Education Center at the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia. “Kennedy thinks he’s helping children with autism, but he’s doing the opposite.”

    Many critics say their only hope is that cracks in President Donald Trump’s governing coalition could lead to a turn away from Kennedy, whose team has reportedly tangled with some White House officials as well as Republican senators. Polling has also shown that much of the American public distrusts Kennedy and does not consider him a health authority, and Trump’s own approval rating has sunk dramatically since he returned to the White House.

    But anti-vaccine activists applauded the revised CDC webpage. “Finally, the CDC is beginning to acknowledge the truth about this condition that affects millions,” Mary Holland, CEO of Children’s Health Defense, the advocacy group Kennedy founded and led before entering politics, told Fox News Digital. “The truth is there is no evidence, no science behind the claim vaccines do not cause autism.”

    Céline Gounder, Amanda Seitz and Amy Maxmen contributed to this report.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • CDC replaces website on vaccines and autism with false and misleading statements

    [ad_1]

    The national Centers for Disease Control and Prevention have altered their website on autism and vaccines, removing unequivocal statements that immunizations don’t cause the neurodevelopmental disorder and replacing them with inaccurate and misleading information about the links between the shots and autism.

    Until Wednesday, the CDC page, “Autism and Vaccines,” began: “Studies have shown that there is no link between receiving vaccines and developing autism spectrum disorder (ASD).”

    This was followed, in large font, by the blunt statement: “Vaccines do not cause autism.”

    The rest of the page summarized some of the CDC’s own studies into autism and vaccine ingredients, none of which found any causal links between the two.

    On Wednesday, the page was altered so that it now begins: “The claim ‘vaccines do not cause autism’ is not an evidence-based claim because studies have not ruled out the possibility that infant vaccines cause autism.”

    The words “Vaccines do not cause autism” still appear near the top, but with an asterisk that leads to a note at the bottom.

    “The header ‘Vaccines do not cause autism’ has not been removed due to an agreement with the chair of the U.S. Senate Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions Committee that it would remain on the CDC website,” the site states.

    The chair of that committee, Sen. Bill Cassidy (R-La.), cast the deciding vote to advance Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s appointment as Health and Human Services secretary, in exchange for Kennedy’s promise that he wouldn’t erode public confidence in vaccines.

    “Studies supporting a link have been ignored by health authorities,” HHS spokesman Andrew Dixon said in an email. “We are updating the CDC’s website to reflect gold standard, evidence-based science.”

    The news was met with outrage by scientists and advocates.

    “We are appalled to find that the content on the CDC webpage ‘Autism and Vaccines’ has been changed and distorted, and is now filled with anti-vaccine rhetoric and outright lies about vaccines and autism,” the nonprofit Autism Science Foundation said in a statement. “The CDC’s previous science and evidence-based website has been replaced with misinformation and now actually contradicts the best available science.”

    The current CDC page now says the rise in autism diagnoses correlates with an increase in the number of vaccines given to infants. Multiple researchers have argued that the rise in autism spectrum disorder diagnoses is better explained by an expanding diagnostic definition of the disorder, along with better monitoring and diagnosis for more children.

    Cassidy’s office did not immediately respond to requests for comment Thursday.

    [ad_2]

    Corinne Purtill

    Source link

  • CDC Promotes Unproven Vaccine–Autism Link in Website Reversal

    [ad_1]

    The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has made a significant revision to a section of its website regarding the relationship between vaccines and autism. Previously, the CDC maintained that vaccines do not cause autism based on extensive research and population studies. The updated statement now suggests that studies have not definitively ruled out a potential link between infant vaccines and autism, marking a shift in the agency’s stance.

     

    This change reflects claims often associated with Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., who has publicly advocated the view that vaccines may be linked to autism, despite the overwhelming scientific consensus that discredits such connections.

     

    In the revised wording, the CDC states that the assertion “vaccines do not cause autism” is “not an evidence-based claim,” suggesting that previous studies showing no link may not have been fully acknowledged by health authorities. The revision has raised concerns among public health experts regarding the potential implications for vaccine confidence and public health messaging.

     

    Reports from Axios and the Washington Post highlight that many CDC career scientists were not consulted or informed before the revision and learned of it only after the update was made public. This change follows an announcement by HHS regarding a research partnership with Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute to explore possible connections between vaccines and autism, which has added to the unease among health professionals.

     

    An HHS spokesperson defended the revised language, stating that it reflects “gold-standard, evidence-based science.” However, there are still questions concerning the motivations behind the review and its timing, as well as how it may influence public perception of vaccine safety. 

     

    MBFC Rating Update:
    Due to this shift, Media Bias/Fact Check has recently downgraded the CDC to Questionable, citing alignment with a Right-Biased government agenda and increasing promotion of anti-science propaganda, conspiracy theories, and pseudoscience under current leadership. While the CDC still hosts valuable historical data and disease tracking resources, its factual reporting is now considered Mixed as political influence continues to erode scientific independence.


    Do you appreciate our work? Please consider one of the following ways to sustain us.

    MBFC Ad-Free 

    or

    MBFC Donation


     

    Subscribe With Email

    Join 21.2K other subscribers

    [ad_2]

    Media Bias Fact Check

    Source link

  • The Feds Foul Play Around Cannabis

    [ad_1]

    The Feds foul play around cannabis exposes misinformation, fear tactics, and how Washington ignores 88% of Americans

    While nearly 88% of Americans support some form of legal cannabis, the old guard in Washington continues to misrepresent the will of the people. This isn’t a quiet disagreement over policy — it’s a stubborn act of defiance by a political class clinging to outdated narratives, using fear and misinformation to stall progress. The Feds foul play around cannabis includes misleading federal ad campaigns to state-level repeal efforts and congressional inaction, the message from the establishment is clear: even overwhelming public consensus won’t shake their prohibitionist reflex.

    RELATED: Zohram Mamdani And NYC’s Legal Marijuana

    The federal government’s recent “Make America Fentanyl Free” initiative sounds like a noble effort — until you look closer. The campaign warns Americans fentanyl-laced cannabis is contributing to a spike in overdose deaths, echoing rhetoric found on official websites like Get Smart About Drugs, a DEA-linked platform.

    But credible health experts and toxicologists have called this claim a myth. Studies and verified cases show virtually no evidence of widespread fentanyl-contaminated marijuana. The CDC’s own overdose data reveal more than 100,000 overdose deaths annually are overwhelmingly tied to synthetic opioids, not cannabis. By folding marijuana into the fentanyl crisis narrative, the campaign blurs science and fear — conflating a regulated, state-legal product with the nation’s deadliest illicit drugs.

    In Massachusetts, prohibitionists are running a petition drive critics say tricks voters into repealing the state’s adult-use cannabis law — one which passed in 2016 with 53.6% support. The so-called Coalition for a Healthy Massachusetts has been accused of presenting the petition as a measure to “protect youth” and “prevent fentanyl exposure,” when in reality it would end the state’s $1.6-billion legal cannabis market.

    Industry advocates and civil-rights leaders argue this fear-based language mirrors the federal fentanyl narrative — a coordinated effort to weaponize overdose panic against legitimate regulation and equity programs have taken years to build.

    At the center of the federal gridlock is House Speaker Mike Johnson, a staunch opponent of cannabis reform who has consistently voted against legalization and banking protections. Johnson has blocked the SAFE Banking Act — a bipartisan bill allowing legal cannabis businesses access banking services — from reaching a floor vote, despite majority support in both chambers. He’s also refused to advance measures like the MORE Act and the Medical Marijuana and Cannabidiol Research Expansion Act, effectively freezing all momentum toward federal reform.

    Johnson’s leadership ensures even modest, widely supported reforms remain in limbo. His record earns him an “F” rating from cannabis policy groups and makes him one of the most significant obstacles to aligning federal law with public opinion.

    RELATED: Marijuana Use And Guy’s Member

    When the federal government claims “drug overdoses are due to fentanyl-laced marijuana,” and state actors use similar rhetoric to roll back legalization, it’s more than misinformation — it’s policy manipulation. The consequences are profound:

    • Public confusion: Americans are told cannabis is linked to deadly fentanyl overdoses, though data show otherwise.
    • Policy paralysis: Federal leaders block reform while invoking the specter of addiction and moral decline.
    • Economic harm: Legal markets — and the jobs, tax revenue, and social-equity progress they bring — are jeopardized by political gamesmanship.

    With almost nine in ten Americans favoring legalization — and over half living in states where cannabis is legal — continued federal obstruction is untenable. The real crisis isn’t cannabis; it’s an outdated federal narrative refusing to evolve with science or society.

    Until Washington stops peddling fear and starts listening to its citizens, the gulf between federal prohibition and public reality will only grow wider. It’s time to replace misinformation with evidence, prohibition with regulation, and political posturing with policy actually serving the American people.

    [ad_2]

    Terry Hacienda

    Source link