Sources in the Conspiracy-Pseudoscience category may publish unverifiable information that is not always supported by evidence. These sources may be untrustworthy for credible/verifiable information; therefore, fact-checking and further investigation is recommended on a per-article basis when obtaining information from these sources. See all Conspiracy-Pseudoscience sources.

  • Overall, WikiSpooks is a far-right biased source that is questionable based on a lack of transparency, poor sourcing, and false claims.

Bias Rating: RIGHT CONSPIRACY=PSEUDOSCIENCE
Factual Reporting: MIXED
Country: Unknown
Press Freedom Rating: N/A
Media Type: Website
Traffic/Popularity: Minimal Traffic
MBFC Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY
Source: https://wikispooks.com/

Read Detailed Report

Left vs. Right Bias: How we rate the bias of media sources

Subscribe With Email

Join 22,639 other subscribers

Media Bias Fact Check

Source link

You May Also Like

PolitiFact – No, this isn’t a real Charles Darwin quote about what it means to be ‘woke’

“Great is the power of steady misrepresentation,” Charles Darwin once said. That’s…

Did Judge in Trump Jan. 6 Case Work at Same Burisma-Linked Law Firm as Hunter Biden?

Claim: U.S. District Court Judge Tanya Chutkan worked at a law firm…

PolitiFact – No, Rod Stewart’s son didn’t suffer a COVID-19 vaccine-induced heart attack

Two headlines juxtaposed on social media leave users to draw one conclusion:…

Did Abductions Occur at Kwik Trip Stores Involving an ‘Arab Woman’ and a Van with Tinted Windows?

Claim: A Facebook post accurately reported that abductions were taking place at…