ReportWire

Tag: Ticketmaster

  • Fans berate Ticketmaster over King Charles’ coronation concert ticket debacle

    Fans berate Ticketmaster over King Charles’ coronation concert ticket debacle

    [ad_1]

    Ticketmaster has made a royal mess of issuing tickets to King Charles’ coronation concert at Windsor Castle, angry fans are saying on social media. 

    The ticketing platform was charged with handling applications to attend the BBC event linked to the U.K.’s first coronation in 70 years. The concert will take place on May 7, the day after King Charles III’s official coronation, and will feature performances from Andrea Bocelli, Lionel Richie, Katy Perry and other stars. 

    Twenty-thousand tickets, released in pairs, were made available to the official coronation event by public ballot, according to the Royal Family’s website.

    Applications were due February 28, and tickets were allocated “based on the geographical spread of the U.K. population, and not on a first-come first-served basis,” according to the Royal Family. In other words, it didn’t matter when you applied for tickets, as long as you did so before the deadline. 

    But fans vying for entry to the post-coronation celebration say Ticketmaster sent them misleading instructions. Many say they received emails suggesting they had won tickets to the event, only for the tickets to be unavailable when fans tried to claim them online. 

    A Wallingford, England, resident called Ticketmaster “disgraceful” in a tweet after the company emailed her April 25 to say she had been “successful in the ballot for a pair of standing tickets” to the once-in-a-lifetime event. 

    “Disgraceful from @Ticketmaster — receive an email saying I’ve won 2 tickets to the Coronation Concert in the ballot and then when you click to claim them they’re all gone. Total shambles of a system. Beyond disappointed,” she wrote on the social media platform. 

    The email from Ticketmaster indicates she was one of a “randomly selected group of ballot winners” offered tickets in a “supplementary round.” The tickets were made available to her on a “first come first served basis,” read the email, which encouraged her to act quickly to secure her spots.

    Apparently, she didn’t act fast enough, and won’t be attending the concert after all. She bashed Ticketmaster online for writing “congratulations” and ultimately leaving her empty-handed.

    “‘Congratulations’ and ‘ballot’ don’t marry with a first come first served system, especially as the main Ts and Cs specified it wouldn’t be like that,” she added on Twitter.

    Ticketmaster did not immediately respond to CBS MoneyWatch’s request for comment. 

    Another user called out Ticketmaster for failing to adhere to its own stated terms and conditions. She, too, was under the impression that tickets would not be allocated on a first-come, first-served basis. 

    “What a poor experience and incredibly misleading!” she said on Twitter Thursday.


    Swifties vs. Ticketmaster

    07:47

    Ticketmaster was recently under fire over how it handled unprecedented demand for Taylor Swift concert tickets.

    Swifties complained that they weren’t able to secure tickets, while resellers hawked them for tens of thousands of dollars, forcing diehard fans to spend a fortune in order to see the artist perform. The snafu prompted investigations into the entertainment company over its alleged monopoly on the market. 

    On Wednesday, Sens. Amy Klobuchar and Richard Blumenthal introduced legislation called the “Unlock Ticketing Markets Act” to create more competition in the live event ticketing market.

    “Right now, one company is leveraging its power to lock venues into exclusive contracts that last up to 10 years, ensuring there is no room for potential competitors to get their foot in the door,” Klobuchar said in a statement Wednesday. “Without competition to incentivize better services and fair prices, we all suffer the consequences. The Unlock Ticketing Markets Act would help consumers, artists and independent venue operators alike by making sure primary ticketing companies face pressure to innovate and improve.” 

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Montreal firm sues Ticketmaster over pricing for ‘Official Platinum’ Drake tickets  | Globalnews.ca

    Montreal firm sues Ticketmaster over pricing for ‘Official Platinum’ Drake tickets | Globalnews.ca

    [ad_1]

    A Quebec man who paid a premium for tickets to an upcoming Drake concert has applied for a class-action lawsuit against Ticketmaster, alleging the American ticket sales company intentionally misled customers for financial gain.

    Montreal law firm LPC Avocat Inc. says in a filing that the lead plaintiff, described as a huge fan of Drake, purchased a pair of “Official Platinum” tickets for a July 14 show in Montreal for $789.54 each. But the day after he bought the tickets, a second Drake concert was announced in the city and Ticketmaster was selling the same seats for $427.06 each.


    Click to play video: 'Taylor Swift ticket chaos leads to US Justice department probe of Ticketmaster, Live Nation'


    Taylor Swift ticket chaos leads to US Justice department probe of Ticketmaster, Live Nation


    The class-action application, filed earlier this week in Laval, Que., just north of Montreal, says Ticketmaster advertised its official platinum tickets as “some of the best seats in the house,” but the lawsuit says the seats secured by the plaintiff were in the upper deck of the Bell Centre — about 13 rows down from the very top of the arena.

    Story continues below advertisement

    READ MORE: Drake tour with 21 Savage includes stops in Vancouver, Montreal; Toronto dates to be announced later

    “I think it is illegal to advertise as some of the best seats in the house, tickets that are in fact some of the worst seats in the house and ? charge a premium compared to other seats,” lawyer Joey Zukran with LPC Avocat Inc. said in an interview.

    Ticketmaster did not respond Friday to an email seeking comment.

    11


    Drake performs during Lil Baby’s Birthday Party at State Farm Arena on Saturday, Dec. 9, 2022, in Atlanta.


    (Photo by Paul R. Giunta/Invision/AP)

    The court filing alleges Ticketmaster unilaterally decides what is sold as “official platinum.”

    Story continues below advertisement

    “The result is that most, if not all, of the tickets advertised and sold as ‘Official Platinum’ are neither ‘premium tickets’ nor ‘some of the best seats in the house’ and are, in fact, just regular tickets sold by Ticketmaster at an artificially inflated premium in bad faith,” the filing reads.

    The lawsuit also alleges that Ticketmaster was aware in advance that there would be more than one Drake show in Montreal this summer.

    Zukran said his client purchased his ticket at a premium based on the idea there was only one show with limited supply. “Therefore, when he finds out the next day that there’s another show, what happens is that the market is flooded with more tickets — another 21,000 tickets — and the price goes down.”

    READ MORE: Ticketmaster says cyberattack, bots to blame for Taylor Swift debacle

    The lawsuit said that “Ticketmaster was very well aware that Drake — one of the most famous singers in the world today — would be performing two concerts in Montreal when it initially released tickets for the first concert, but concealed this information from the public in order to squeeze out as much money as possible from real fans who lined up (virtually) to purchase tickets for the first show.”

    The class action is seeking an injunction to stop Ticketmaster from branding tickets as “official platinum” when they’re not the best seats in the house, and for each member of the potential class action to be refunded for the difference in price and paid $300 each in damages.

    Story continues below advertisement

    The allegations have not been tested in court, and the Quebec Superior Court has not yet ruled on whether it would allow the class action to move forward.

    Zukran said lawyers will seek a national class to include any Canadian ticket purchasers, but added that Ticketmaster may or may not raise arguments to limit the scope to Quebec.

    “The legal claim is based on the Consumer Protection Act of Quebec, as well as the Competition Act, which applies nationally. So we could potentially have a national class, but that’s a debate for the court,” Zukran said.

    It’s unclear how many people could be included in the class action, Zukran said.

    &copy 2023 The Canadian Press

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • The Cure frontman Robert Smith says he’s “sickened” by Ticketmaster fees

    The Cure frontman Robert Smith says he’s “sickened” by Ticketmaster fees

    [ad_1]

    Swifties vs. Ticketmaster


    Swifties vs. Ticketmaster

    07:47

    Ticketmaster is again arousing the ire of concertgoers after fans of the popular ’80s British band The Cure complained on social media about having to pay processing fees that exceeded the face value of the tickets.

    The Cure priced tickets for its upcoming North American tour as low as $20 after pledging to make the shows affordable for fans. The group also wrote on its website that it worked with its ticketing partners to thwart scalpers and avoid inflated resale prices.

    Despite those efforts, some tickets were going for more than double their base price on Wednesday after fans added up the costs of Ticketmaster’s facility charges, service and order processing fees. 

    Cure frontman Robert Smith tweeted that he was “sickened” by the Ticketmaster fee “debacle” and had no control over the site’s charges. “I have been asking how [the fees] are justified,” he wrote. “If I get anything coherent by way of an answer I will let you all know.”

    TicketMaster did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

    Ticketmaster has long drawn criticism for its sales practices. In December, the service faced a widespread backlash, as well as a lawsuit, when it canceled a public sale of Taylor Swift tour tickets after sky-high demand caused its website to crash. And in February, concertgoers bemoaned technical difficulties in using Ticketmaster and long lines after trying to snag Beyonce tour tickets

    The flood of complaints over the Swift ticket debacle also attracted scrutiny from lawmakers. The Senate Judiciary Committee’s antitrust panel earlier this year held a hearing over whether Live Nation Entertainment — the company that owns Ticketmaster — and several other ticket service providers violated laws to preserve competition and should be broken up

    The Justice Department is also investigating whether Live Nation has abused its power over the multibillion-dollar concert industry. 


    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Drake And 21 Savage Tour Tickets Cost More Than Beyoncé’s — And Twitter Is Losing It

    Drake And 21 Savage Tour Tickets Cost More Than Beyoncé’s — And Twitter Is Losing It

    [ad_1]

    Drake and 21 Savage are in the hot seat with Twitter users over the “outrageous” ticket prices for their upcoming tour following their successful “Her Loss” album.

    On Wednesday, the Grammy winner announced the highly anticipated “It’s All a Blur” tour on Instagram via a documentary-style trailer. Drake hasn’t been on tour since 2018, so naturally, fans rapidly flocked to the Ticketmaster site to snag seats before they sold out.

    Cash App card holders scored early access to purchase pre-sale tickets on Wednesday. However, it didn’t take long for fans to head to Twitter to bash the exorbitant prices.

    The complaints come amid recent allegations over Ticketmaster’s unfair business practices after bots disrupted ticket sales for Taylor Swift’s Eras tour in November.

    Many Twitter users also scoffed at Drake’s ticket prices surpassing the cost of Beyoncé’s Renaissance World Tour.

    On the other hand, some fans didn’t seem to mind the sky-high price of admission.

    In November, the rap duo again found themselves in trouble after being sued by Vogue’s publisher Condé Nast. The lawsuit alleges that the musicians used the fashion magazine’s name without permission to promote “Her Loss.”

    The lawsuit claimed the rappers’ promotional campaign, which used a fake Vogue cover story to boost the album to their more than 135 million social media followers, violated intellectual property laws and misled fans, according to reports.

    The musical pair are set to make tour stops in 21 cities starting on June 16 in New Orleans before the tour’s finale in Glendale, Arizona, on Sept. 5. General public ticket sales for the “It’s All a Blur” tour are set to start Friday.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Swifties vs. Ticketmaster

    Swifties vs. Ticketmaster

    [ad_1]

    Swifties vs. Ticketmaster – CBS News


    Watch CBS News



    Even before the recent Taylor Swift ticket snafu, Ticketmaster and its parent company, the concert promoter Live Nation Entertainment, have been criticized for controlling 70% of the big concert ticket market, leaving fans and artists nowhere else to go. Live Nation is now being investigated by the Justice Department, and last month was called to testify before a Senate anti-trust subcommittee. Correspondent Rita Braver talks with Sen. Amy Klobuchar; with an attorney who has filed a lawsuit against Ticketmaster; and with disappointed Swifties – fans of the pop star who can’t “shake it off.”

    Be the first to know

    Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.


    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Taylor Swift fans, and Congress, take on Ticketmaster

    Taylor Swift fans, and Congress, take on Ticketmaster

    [ad_1]

    Twins Izzy and Alexa Harrison, of Potomac, Maryland, have a room that is like a shrine to Taylor Swift. They also sport Taylor Swift merch, wearing her cardigan sweaters, and sporting her necklace. “She’s my role model, and she just makes me happy,” said Alexa.

    But the twins were not happy when their mom was unable to get tickets for Swift’s upcoming Eras Tour using a special code that Ticketmaster gave out to verified fans who had bought Swift’s merchandise and downloaded her music. “Just disappointing and, like, upsetting,” said Izzy.

    The twins’ mom, Penny Harrison, spent several hours just trying to sign on: “I signed on at 9:30 in the morning, and at 10:00 it kicked me out, and then you just sign back on again. So, by the time I got in, it was 4:30 in the afternoon,” she said. The problems continued for several hours as she tried and failed to purchase seats. “Any time I would click on something and try to put it in the basket, it would say, ‘Somebody else got those tickets, try again.’ I kept clicking, ‘Somebody else got those tickets.’ I kept trying to sign on all night.”

    ticketmaster-queue.jpg
    For some Taylor Swift fans, scoring tickets to her tour was beyond their “wildest dreams.”

    CBS News


    She wasn’t the only Swifty (as the fans call themselves) who couldn’t just “shake it off.” But one shut-out Swifty thought it was time to be “fearless.” In a TikTok post Dallas personal injury attorney Jennifer Kinder said, “We need to sue Ticketmaster.”

    More than 300 other disappointed fans (including Penny Harrison) joined Kinder’s lawsuit against Ticketmaster, in which she is alleging fraud, misrepresentation, and anti-trust violations.

    Braver asked, “Their argument, of course, is going to be, ‘Hey, this was like a lottery. You weren’t guaranteed to win.’”

    “I don’t think that this is a lottery,” Kinder said. “It is a purposeful manipulation of a sale, in order to increase their profit. That’s really what this is about.”

    swifties-protest-b.jpg
    Last month Taylor Swift fans protested against Ticketmaster and its parent company, Live Nation Entertainment, in Washington, D.C.

    CBS News


    The fans who are suing have one key supporter: Sen. Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.). “I’m always rooting for people that are taking on big monopolies,” she explained.

    Klobuchar charges that Ticketmaster and its parent company, the concert promoter Live Nation Entertainment, do constitute a monopoly, controlling 70% of the big concert ticket market, leaving fans and artists alike nowhere else to go.

    “They’ve actually starting buying arenas,” Klobuchar said, “but for the arenas that they don’t own, they tend to lock in on three- or five- or seven-year contracts, so that those arenas are boxed out of using competitors. So, picture this: there they are with the monopoly on the tickets, then they’ve got the promotion, then they’ve got the arenas.”

    And, as chair of the Senate Judiciary Committee’s anti-trust subcommittee, Klobuchar called a high-profile hearing a week-and-a-half ago to question whether Live Nation Entertainment needs to be broken up.

    At the January 24 hearing, Klobuchar said, “Taylor Swift is just one example; whether it’s Bruce Springsteen or BTS or Bad Bunny, or in the past Pearl Jam or the Pixies, fans, artists and venues are facing real issues with Live Nation.”

    Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.) noted (tongue firmly in cheek) that Live Nation had done the almost impossible in deeply-partisan Washington: “I want to congratulate and thank you for an absolutely stunning achievement: You have brought together Republicans and Democrats in an absolutely unified cause.”

    Joe Berchtold, Live Nation Entertaiment’s president and chief financial officer, blamed it all on an unprecedented BOT attack: “This is what led to a terrible consumer experience, which we deeply regret. We need to do better, and we will do better.”

    Senators were not appeased. Sen. John Kennedy (R-La.) suggested a ban on ticket re-sales to foil scalpers from jacking up prices: “Cap the price, cut out the bots, cut out the middle people.”

    And as for those annoying fees that can add many dollars to a ticket price, Klobuchar asked why Live Nation hasn’t done more to reduce them. Berchtold replied, “The fees are set by the venues.” 

    Also appearing before the sub-committee, singer-songwriter Clyde Lawrence begged to differ: “We asked that question to the venues, and they say, ‘Not only do we not choose what it is, we don’t even know what it is, we can’t even tell you what it’s going to be.’”

    More than a decade ago, when Live Nation and Ticketmaster first wanted to merge, there was so much concern about competition that the Justice Department insisted on a consent decree that would “forbid the company from engaging in anti-competitive conduct.”

    Klobuchar told “Sunday Morning,” “Well, they had violations of that, clear violations. And because of that, they have basically extended that consent decree.  It keeps going. But whatever they’ve done, it hasn’t been enough.”

    And Dean Budnick, who has written a book on the ticket industry, says – deliberate or not – just being part of Live Nation gives Ticketmaster an edge. (Or, to quote Taylor Swift, “It’s hard to fight when the fight ain’t fair.”)

    Plume


    “You don’t need to directly communicate to a would-be venue partner, ‘Hey, we’re affilated with Live Nation, the biggest concert promoter in the country. And maybe if you don’t enter into a contract with us, you might not get Live Nation shows,’” Budnick said.

    CBS News has confirmed that, even before the Taylor Swift ticket snafu, the Justice Department has begun an investigation into the practices of Live Nation Entertainment, Ticketmaster’s parent company.  The company would not give us an interview for this story.

    Still, Budnick argues that Ticketmaster shouldn’t get all the blame: “Ticketmaster’s clients are not the concert-goers; Ticketmaster’s clients are the venues and the promoters. And so, when customers get outraged at times, Ticketmaster, historically, they’ve always been willing to sort of put on the asbestos suit and take the heat.”

    But Taylor Swift fans like Penny Harrison and attorney Jennifer Kinder, who demonstrated outside the Capitol hearing, are demanding action: “When something is wrong and not fair, it’s our responsibility to try to make the change,” Kinder said.

    And with Ticketmaster starting sales tomorrow for Beyonce’s upcoming concert tour, Washington is watching.

    “This is just an incredible gift in America, which is this music industry, something we’ve literally given the world,” said Klobuchar. “And when you have one entity that is basically ticketing all the events and letting fans in the door, that gives them inordinate power.”

         
    For more info:

           
    Story produced by David Rothman. Editor: Ed Givnish.


    The 65th Grammy Awards will be presented on Sunday, February 5, and will be broadcast live on CBS and on demand via Paramount+ beginning at 7 p.m. ET.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Top Democrats Warn Ticketmaster Over Beyoncé World Tour: ‘We’re Watching’

    Top Democrats Warn Ticketmaster Over Beyoncé World Tour: ‘We’re Watching’

    [ad_1]

    Democrats on the Senate Judiciary Committee issued a firm warning to Ticketmaster on Thursday after Beyoncé announced her Renaissance World Tour: “We’re watching.”

    Lawmakers have been eyeing Ticketmaster and parent company Live Nation since the debacle surrounding Taylor Swift’s hotly anticipated Eras Tour. Millions of her fans waited for hours to get their hands on tickets in November, but many were left empty-handed amid site glitches and opaque rules about how to register for presale access. Ticketmaster later canceled the general sale, apologizing but blaming what they called “unprecedented demand” for tickets.

    Senators held a committee hearing last month after the firestorm, when lawmakers on both sides of the aisle grilled Live Nation’s president, Joe Berchtold. Ticketmaster and Live Nation were allowed to merge in 2010, but some have questioned if the company has been able to turn into a monopoly for ticket sales and touring.

    “This whole concert ticket system is a mess — it’s a monopolistic mess,” Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.), a member of the judiciary committee, said at the time.

    Berchtold has argued Ticketmaster has an “obligation to do better,” but he rejected notions the broader company is a monopoly.

    Demand for Beyoncé’s tour is already set to be off the charts. Live Nation said this week that the number of registrations (a prerequisite to have a chance to later buy tickets) “already exceed the number of available tickets by more than 800%” in some cities. Additional dates have been added in cities including Chicago, Los Angeles, Atlanta and Houston.

    The full list of shows, which begin in Europe, can be found here.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Ticketmaster To Require Purchase Of Round-Trip Concert Tickets For Exiting Venue After Show

    Ticketmaster To Require Purchase Of Round-Trip Concert Tickets For Exiting Venue After Show

    [ad_1]

    WEST HOLLYWOOD, CA—Updating the company’s terms of service, live-entertainment giant Ticketmaster announced Wednesday that it would soon be requiring customers to purchase round-trip tickets to cover the cost of both entering and exiting a concert venue. “Round-trip tickets will only be required in cases where the attendee wishes not only to be admitted to a show, but also to be permitted to leave once the show is over,” said Ticketmaster spokesperson Brenna Winfield, adding that there would be a limited number of tickets available for any given departure time, so customers who wanted to be among the first to leave a concert should expect to pay a higher fee. “Ticketmaster customers worried about the additional costs associated with exiting a venue should know that rates drop significantly on slower days, so if they attend an event on, say, a busy Saturday night, they can typically save up to 15% by extending their stay in the completely dark, empty arena until Tuesday or Wednesday. Another option is to leave the show before it ends, but please be aware we charge a $200 ticket-change fee for concertgoers who decide they want to go home early because the band sucks.” At press time, several hundred Taylor Swift fans had reportedly been trampled to death in Arizona after Ticketmaster’s demand-based pricing system pushed the cost of exiting State Farm Stadium to more than $10,000.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Musician Expertly Dissects Everything Wrong With Ticketmaster In 2 Minutes

    Musician Expertly Dissects Everything Wrong With Ticketmaster In 2 Minutes

    [ad_1]

    Ticketmaster merged with Live Nation in 2010, and as a result now sells tickets, promotes concerts and in some cases even owns and/or operates the venues. Critics say that’s led to a monopoly that squeezes artists and consumers alike.

    Clyde Lawrence of the band Lawrence explained the problem to the Senate ― and he managed to do it in just a touch over two minutes in this video clip posted by The Recount:

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Senators grill Ticketmaster over Taylor Swift fiasco, antitrust concerns

    Senators grill Ticketmaster over Taylor Swift fiasco, antitrust concerns

    [ad_1]

    Senators grill Ticketmaster over Taylor Swift fiasco, antitrust concerns – CBS News


    Watch CBS News



    On Tuesday, senators grilled the leader of Live Nation, which owns Ticketmaster, over the concert promoter’s highly publicized meltdown during ticket sales for Taylor Swift’s “Eras” tour. Scott MacFarlane reports.

    Be the first to know

    Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.


    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Ticketmaster says cyberattack, bots to blame for Taylor Swift debacle – National | Globalnews.ca

    Ticketmaster says cyberattack, bots to blame for Taylor Swift debacle – National | Globalnews.ca

    [ad_1]

    Ticketmaster said it learned a “valuable lesson” from last year’s Taylor Swift concert sale fiasco, though it may not be enough to win over American politicians arguing the company has too much control in the live event market.

    On Tuesday, a top executive from Ticketmaster’s parent company Live Nation Entertainment appeared at the U.S. Senate to argue they do not hold a ticket sale monopoly. The company has also denied breaking any antitrust laws.

    Read more:

    A brief history of scalping concert tickets

    Read next:

    Ontario couple’s luggage containing tracker donated to charity by Air Canada

    In written testimony submitted prior to Tuesday’s trial, Live Nation claimed that Ticketmaster’s Taylor Swift sale was targeted by software bots that illegally obtained tickets and snubbed eager fans. These bots were then able to flip and resell tickets bought in bulk for astronomical prices.

    Story continues below advertisement

    In November 2022, a chaotic presale for Swift’s 2023 Eras stadium tour left thousands of fans without admission. Though Ticketmaster required fans to register for the presale in an attempt to prevent cyberattacks, fans experienced site crashes and hours-long online queue times.

    The company claimed that more than 3.5 million people registered for the presale. In a statement, Ticketmaster wrote it sold more than two million tickets and fielded 3.5 billion system requests, which is four times its previous peak.

    As a result, Ticketmaster had to cancel the planned general ticket sale due to a lack of remaining inventory.

    After the botched sale, Swift said it was “excruciating for me to just watch mistakes happen with no recourse.”


    Taylor Swift posted a statement to her Instagram account about Ticketmaster’s sale cancellation on Nov. 17, 2022.


    Instagram / @taylorswift

    “We apologize to the fans, we apologize to Ms. Swift, we need to do better and we will do better,” Live Nation’s president and chief financial officer, Joe Berchtold, said during the hearing on Tuesday.

    Story continues below advertisement

    “In hindsight, there are several things we could have done better, including staggering the sales over a longer period of time and doing a better job setting fan expectations for getting tickets.”

    Ticketmaster merged with Live Nation in 2010, reportedly resulting in control of more than 70 per cent of the primary ticketing and live event venues market.

    Berchtold asked lawmakers to focus on creating legislation to do with ticket scalping and other fraudulent practices, like third-party listings for tickets that have yet to go on sale.


    Click to play video: 'Taylor Swift ticket chaos leads to US Justice department probe of Ticketmaster, Live Nation'


    Taylor Swift ticket chaos leads to US Justice department probe of Ticketmaster, Live Nation


    Read more:

    2023 Oscar nominations — ‘Everything Everywhere All At Once’ leads with 11

    Read next:

    Children died from drinking unpasteurized raw milk at Saddle Lake residential school: advocacy group

    Live Nation said in November that the reason it holds a dominant role in the marketplace is “the large gap that exists between the quality of the Ticketmaster system and the next best primary ticketing system.”

    Story continues below advertisement

    Jack Groetzinger, co-founder of ticket sales platform SeatGeek, said during the Senate hearing Tuesday that existing ticket sale methods are “antiquated and ripe for innovation.”

    “As long as Live Nation remains both the dominant concert promoter and ticketer of major venues in the U.S., the industry will continue to lack competition and struggle,” he told lawmakers.

    With files from Reuters 

    &copy 2023 Global News, a division of Corus Entertainment Inc.

    [ad_2]

    Sarah Do Couto

    Source link

  • Watch Live: Senators grill Live Nation leader over Taylor Swift ticketing fiasco

    Watch Live: Senators grill Live Nation leader over Taylor Swift ticketing fiasco

    [ad_1]

    Ticketmaster is defending itself publicly for the first time since the concert promoter’s highly publicized meltdown late last year during ticket sales for Taylor Swift’s “Eras” tour.

    Joe Berchtold, the president and chief financial officer of Live Nation, which owns Ticketmaster, made the case to the Senate Judiciary Committee on Tuesday that the live concert industry is more competitive than it was a decade ago, when Live Nation merged with Ticketmaster, and that the ticket seller doesn’t control capacity or pricing.

    “Primary ticketing companies, including Ticketmaster, do not set ticket prices, do not decide how many tickets go on sale and when they go on sale, do not set service fees,” he said in opening remarks.

    Berchtold’s assessment was in stark contract to Sen. Amy Klobuchar, who said in her opening statement that Ticketmaster fits “a definition of monopoly.”

    “Live Nation is so powerful that it doesn’t even need to exert pressure, it doesn’t need to threaten, because people just fall in line,” the Minnesota Democrat said.

    Three roles in one

    Anti-monopoly scholars and consumer advocates point to Ticketmaster’s role as a ticket seller, an owner or operator of event venues as well as a promoter for events. The company both fronts the costs for an event and advertises it. Live Nation’s reach allows it to exert pressure on performers and lock them into subpar deals, scholars testified. 

    “Major venues in the United States know that if they move their primary ticketing business from Ticketmaster to a competitor, they risk losing the substantial revenue they earn from Live Nation concerts. They know this because Live Nation has told them so,  directly and indirectly — through its public pronouncements, private communications and subsequent retaliation against venues that have defied Ticketmaster,” SeatGeek CEO Jack Groetzinger testified.

    Berchtold contended that Live Nation owns only a small portion of the 4,000-some event venues in the U.S. — about 5%, he said. However, critics note that the events giant’s portfolio includes the largest and most profitable venues, while its Ticketmaster division has exclusive ticketing contracts with an overwhelming majority of sports venues.

    Last year, 87% of Billboard Top 40 performances were ticketed by Ticketmaster, and the company holds exlusive ticketing contracts with 87% of NBA and NHL arenas and 97% of NFL stadiums, testified Jerry Mickelson, head of independent event producer Jam Productions.

    “This merger is vertical integration on steroids. Using dominance in one market to decrease competition in another,” he said. Jam, which has produced nearly 1,500 live events in the 40 years since its founding, produced only one since 2015, Mickelson said.

    “Arena concerts used to be Jam’s most profitable business,” he said. But since the merger, “Live Nation succeeded in driving independent promoters out of that sector.”

    Musicians grossed $6 from $42 concert tickets

    Independent music group Lawrence, whose recent song “False Alarms” contains the phrase, “Live Nation is a monopoly,” illustrated Live Nation’s power with an example. 

    “Live Nation acts as three things at the same time: The promoter, the venue, the ticketing company,” Clyde Lawrence, a member of the band, told the committee. Because Live Nation owns the venue, fronts the the money for the show and sells the tickets, they have outsized power when negotiating with artists, Lawrence said.

    “If they want to take 10% of the revenues and call it a facility fee, they can, and have. If they want to charge $30,000 for [facility rent], they can and have. If they want to charge us $250 for a stack of clean towels, they can, and have,” Lawrence said.

    He illustrated the disparity with an example of a show for which Lawrence set ticket prices at $30. After Ticketmaster added on a 40% fee, fans paid $42 per ticket. After paying for facility costs, the band made $12 per ticket — about half of which went to cover the costs of touring.

    “That leaves us with $6 for an eight-piece band, pretax, and we also have to pay our own health insurance,” Lawrence said.

    He added, “We truly don’t see Live Nation as the enemy. They are just the largest player in a game that feels stacked against us as artists, and often our fans as well.”

    Taylor Swift meltdown

    The widely anticipated hearing was called shortly after Ticketmaster in November canceled a sale for Taylor Swift’s concert tour when the service experienced technical glitches and what it called “historic” customer demand for seats. Swift had planned her “Eras” Tour for 52 concerts across 18 venues, with Ticketmaster the primary ticketer for all but five of those shows. During a pre-sale event on November 15, the Ticketmaster site crashed after 14 million fans and bots tried to buy tickets. Thousands of fans who thought they were cleared to buy tickets were unable to purchase them, leading some to sue Ticketmaster.

    Interested parties started lining up for the hearing well before 9 a.m., more than an hour before its start. By the time the doors opened, the line snaked down the hallway.

    Sal Nuzzo, a witness from free-market think tank The James Madison Institute, commented that his daughters informed him this hearing would be “the most important” thing he does in his career, adding that he drove through a crowd of protesters on the way to the hearing.


    Taylor Swift fans sue Ticketmaster

    00:17

    The episode has led to calls to split up Ticketmaster, with critics charging that the ticketing platform, promoter and venue owner monopolizes the market for events. Attendees from the American Economic Liberties Institute, an anti-monopoly group, passed out flyers in the hearing room calling for a breakup of the company.

    Ticketmaster is estimated to have a market share of more than 70% of the U.S. ticketing industry, and is the primary ticketer for over 80% of professional sports teams and venues for the NBA, NHL and NFL. Live Nation disputes those claims, saying that its market share has shrunk since the 2010 merger.

    “Ticketmaster has lost, not gained, market share, and every year competitive bidding results in ticketing companies getting less of the economic value in a ticketing contract while venues and teams get more,” Berchtold said. “U.S. ticketing markets have never been more competitive than they are today, and we read about new potential entrants all the time.”

    The Senate also heard from ticketing platform SeatGeek and live-event producer Jam Productions, as well as scholars who study antitrust.

    Scalpers at fault?

    Live Nation put much of the blame on bots and scalpers who scoop up tickets in order to resell them at higher prices. At least some artists agree with this assessment. In a letter supporting Live Nation, country music star Garth Brooks asked the committee to make scalping illegal. 

    “The crush of bots during an on-sale is a huge reason for program failure NO MATTER WHO THE TICKET SELLING COMPANY is. And the one who ALWAYS pays for this atrocity is the customer, the LAST one on whom that burden should fall,” Brooks wrote in a letter submitted to the committee.

    Live Nation claims it has invested millions developing anti-bot technology on the platform.

    The Department of Justice is investigating Live Nation over whether the company’s market power violates antitrust law and hurts competition, and the Tennessee Attorney General’s office is investigating the Swift incident, as well as what some fans allege was subpar customer support during the snafu.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • A brief history of scalping concert tickets – National | Globalnews.ca

    A brief history of scalping concert tickets – National | Globalnews.ca

    [ad_1]

    There are few things more frustrating to a music fan than being shut out of a sold-out concert only to see tickets for sale at inflated prices on the secondary market. And how do those guys selling tickets on the street outside the venue get their inventory?

    Scalpers (“ticket touters” to the British and “leveraged arbitragers” to ardent capitalists) are as old as live events themselves. When the Greeks opened the first-ever outdoor amphitheatre in 325 BCE — it was built into the hillside of the Acropolis and sat up to 17,000 people in its 55 semi-circular rows — there was no doubt some dude in a robe outside the gates yelling “Who’s got seats?” The same would have happened at the first Roman theatre in Pompeii in 80 BCE. And I’d lay money on the same thing happening outside of Shakespeare’s Globe Theatre for the premiere of A Midsummer Night’s Dream in 1604.

    Read more:

    In defence of Ticketmaster’s ‘dynamic pricing’ model for concert tickets (Aug. 12, 2022)

    Read next:

    A rare green comet not seen in 50,000 years is coming. Here’s how Canadians can see it

    Story continues below advertisement

    Scalping (a term that first appeared in the 19th century referring to brokers of railway tickets) has always been a problem. How could a regular person get into shows when there were crowds of “ticket speculators” and “sidewalk men” who employed people to stand in line for them (“diggers) and had secret access to insiders at the box office who gladly handed over tickets for a cut of the proceeds (known as “ice”)?

    When Jenny Lind, a singer known as “The Swedish Nightingale,” toured the United States in 1851, the very best seats in the house mysteriously disappeared immediately only to reappear in the hands of speculators who sold them with significant markups. A ticket with a face value of $3 might go for $6. There was a rumour that Lind’s agents were in on the scam, something that damaged her in the eyes of the public.

    When Charles Dickens went on a book tour of America in 1867, his public readings sold out in minutes. George Dolby, Dickens’ manager, lamented about a show in Boston. “[B]y eight o’clock in the morning, the queue [outside the box office] was nearly half a mile long and about the time that the employers of the persons who had been standing in the streets all night began to arrive to take their places. … [T]he horrid speculators who buy all the good tickets and sell them again at exorbitant prices.” In New York, fans waiting in line were offered as much as twenty dollars for their place in line by scalpers looking to acquire tickets.

    Dickens hated this, especially since he and his manager were accused of being in on the swindle. He wrote to his sister-in-law: “We are at wits; end how to keep tickets out of the hands of speculators. … The young under-graduates of Cambridge have made a representation to Longfellow that they are five hundred strong and cannot get one ticket.”

    Story continues below advertisement

    Time and time again, theatres, performers, managers, agents, promoters, and governments have tried to clamp down on scalping. In 1927, New York City looked into the situation with Broadway theatres and local music halls. Nothing happened. The same with an investigation in 1949. And again in 1963. Nothing, it seemed, could be done about a black market in theatre tickets that totalled millions of dollars each year. It wasn’t uncommon for a box office manager to earn beyond $25,000 a year and buy a new Cadillac every year. Guess where that supplementary income came from?

    The problem only became bigger when rock concerts became big business. In the days before computers, box offices had racks of printed tickets, the best of which vanished before sales even began.

    Maintaining an accurate ticket count (and thus a proper accounting of revenue) was impossible using the system of hard tickets sold through a box office. Surely there had to be a solution. This is where the first computerized ticket-selling programs came into existence. The first, Computicket and TRS (Ticket Reservation Services), arrived in the middle 1960s, prompting their systems as a way to cut down on scalping by keeping track of every single ticket sold.

    Story continues below advertisement

    Great in theory, but despite decades of advancements with computerized ticket selling, paperless tickets, and fan-driven ticket exchanges, scalpers and secondary-market companies still manage to get their hands on tickets.


    Click to play video: 'Madonna announces world tour with stops in 3 Canadian cities'


    Madonna announces world tour with stops in 3 Canadian cities


    The problem is not going away. In fact, things are just getting weirder and more contentious with things like Ticketmaster’s professional reseller program. “Diggers” and “ice” also still exist in the digital realm. Instead of bribing box office managers and hiring people to stand in line, they use bots, fake identities, access comp tickets, and infiltrate sales meant for fan clubs. They’re pretty resourceful and tech-savvy people.

    This past Friday, Jan. 20, Madonna started selling tickets for her worldwide 40th-anniversary Celebration Tour, Ticketmaster’s first major on-sale challenge since the Taylor Swift fiasco late last year. Although tickets were advertised for as little as $40, you have to wonder how many of those made it into the hands of fans at that price and how many are now controlled by the secondary market (StubHub, SeatGeek, Vivid Tickets, etc.) as well as individual scalpers.

    Story continues below advertisement

    Also this week, a new campaign called Make Tickets Fair launched in the U.K. and EU. The goal is to educate the public about the perils and protocols of ticket reselling. It may help a little bit, but I can’t help feeling that organizers are wasting their breath.

    It all comes down to this: When you have a perishable high-demand commodity like a concert ticket, someone is always going to find a way to make money from someone else’s desires. It’s a game of Whack-A-Mole as old as live entertainment itself.

    Alan Cross is a broadcaster with Q107 and 102.1 the Edge and a commentator for Global News.

    Subscribe to Alan’s Ongoing History of New Music Podcast now on Apple Podcast or Google Play

    &copy 2023 Global News, a division of Corus Entertainment Inc.

    [ad_2]

    Alan Cross

    Source link

  • Things To Never Say To A Taylor Swift Fan

    Things To Never Say To A Taylor Swift Fan

    [ad_1]

    Image for article titled Things To Never Say To A Taylor Swift Fan

    Too many innocent people to count have died at the hands of devout Swifties, hell-bent on revenge. For your own safety, never say these things to a Taylor Swift fan.

    2 / 23

    “Her negligence led to a massive ground beef recall.”

    “Her negligence led to a massive ground beef recall.”

    Image for article titled Things To Never Say To A Taylor Swift Fan

    Unless you have a death wish, we would avoid blaming Taylor for any nationwide E. coli outbreaks.

    3 / 23

    “We have no idea where Taylor Swift was the morning of April 19th, 1995.”

    “We have no idea where Taylor Swift was the morning of April 19th, 1995.”

    Image for article titled Things To Never Say To A Taylor Swift Fan

    Sure, we’ve been told that Timothy McVeigh and Terry Nichols had no help blowing up the FBI headquarters in Oklahoma City, but Taylor’s lack of an alibi can’t be ignored.

    4 / 23

    “I don’t care if you got tickets, young lady. You’re not going out on a school night.”

    “I don’t care if you got tickets, young lady. You’re not going out on a school night.”

    Image for article titled Things To Never Say To A Taylor Swift Fan

    Mom, come on!

    5 / 23

    “She doesn’t even design her own album art.”

    “She doesn’t even design her own album art.”

    Image for article titled Things To Never Say To A Taylor Swift Fan

    Taylor’s fans hate being confronted with the fact that her Photoshop and Illustrator skills are mediocre at best.

    6 / 23

    “Her Capital One ads are uninspired.”

    “Her Capital One ads are uninspired.”

    Image for article titled Things To Never Say To A Taylor Swift Fan

    This is very insulting because all Taylor Swift fans watch these commercials on a loop for several hours each day.

    7 / 23

    “Every musician has their strengths and weaknesses.”

    “Every musician has their strengths and weaknesses.”

    Image for article titled Things To Never Say To A Taylor Swift Fan

    Eat shit and die, how about that?

    8 / 23

    “I loved her ‘Piano Man’ era.”

    “I loved her ‘Piano Man’ era.”

    Image for article titled Things To Never Say To A Taylor Swift Fan

    This is a common mistake, but that’s actually Billy Joel.

    9 / 23

    “The Ticketmaster/LiveNation merger was extremely problematic long before you saw fit to take notice.”

    “The Ticketmaster/LiveNation merger was extremely problematic long before you saw fit to take notice.”

    Image for article titled Things To Never Say To A Taylor Swift Fan

    Look, an antitrust ally is an antitrust ally, regardless of how they got there, okay?

    10 / 23

    “My favorite folklore is ‘Botan Dōrō.’”

    “My favorite folklore is ‘Botan Dōrō.’”

    Image for article titled Things To Never Say To A Taylor Swift Fan

    No offense to the Japanese people, but this haunting parable about loving a ghost has nothing on the song “cardigan.”

    11 / 23

    “I know that her nice girl image is fake because she regularly eggs my house.”

    “I know that her nice girl image is fake because she regularly eggs my house.”

    Image for article titled Things To Never Say To A Taylor Swift Fan

    No need to ruin the façade for them too.

    12 / 23

    “She can only summon lightning when it’s stormy out.”

    “She can only summon lightning when it’s stormy out.”

    Image for article titled Things To Never Say To A Taylor Swift Fan

    Taylor can and will strike you dead by lightning on a sunny day just for saying that.

    13 / 23

    “More people are deserving of the Nobel Prize in physics.”

    “More people are deserving of the Nobel Prize in physics.”

    Image for article titled Things To Never Say To A Taylor Swift Fan

    I guess you haven’t read her research as the lead scientist of the Large Hadron Collider at CERN.

    14 / 23

    “I’ve written more songs about John Mayer.”

    “I’ve written more songs about John Mayer.”

    Image for article titled Things To Never Say To A Taylor Swift Fan

    That’s just a weird thing to brag about.

    “She can’t dance!”

    Image for article titled Things To Never Say To A Taylor Swift Fan

    Well, neither could Martin Luther King Jr., but we still listen to all his bops.

    16 / 23

    “Taylor Swift is just a stage name. Her real name is Ogbert McCarthy.”

    “Taylor Swift is just a stage name. Her real name is Ogbert McCarthy.”

    Image for article titled Things To Never Say To A Taylor Swift Fan

    Don’t be mean, there’s no need to spoil her mystique.

    17 / 23

    Midnights is good but it’s no Der Ring des Nibelungen.”

    Midnights is good but it’s no Der Ring des Nibelungen.”

    Image for article titled Things To Never Say To A Taylor Swift Fan

    While it’s fair to say that Midnights doesn’t hold a candle to Wagner’s 15-hour epic opera, it’s not nice to remind people about that.

    18 / 23

    “She’s just for teen girls.”

    “She’s just for teen girls.”

    Image for article titled Things To Never Say To A Taylor Swift Fan

    No, she was just for teen girls, but now those teen girls are 30 and have developed an appetite for revenge.

    “The dubstep icon?”

    Image for article titled Things To Never Say To A Taylor Swift Fan

    Swifties have worked hard to forget Taylor’s brief electronic dance music phase back in the aughts.

    20 / 23

    “I work for Ticketmaster.”

    “I work for Ticketmaster.”

    Image for article titled Things To Never Say To A Taylor Swift Fan

    You really shouldn’t tell anybody that.

    21 / 23

    “I’m really only into K-Pop”

    “I’m really only into K-Pop”

    Image for article titled Things To Never Say To A Taylor Swift Fan

    It’s just a matter of time before she dominates that genre as well.

    22 / 23

    “She’s going to die someday, just like everyone else.”

    “She’s going to die someday, just like everyone else.”

    Image for article titled Things To Never Say To A Taylor Swift Fan

    No, you’ll die someday. And according to the posts on Taylor Swift message boards, that day is today.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Country music star Zach Bryan drops

    Country music star Zach Bryan drops

    [ad_1]

    The chorus against Ticketmaster’s contentious concert pricing practices is growing, numbering among them Zach Bryan and friends.

    The country music artist dropped a live album, “All My Homies Hate Ticketmaster,” on Sunday. With it came a statement posted to social media in which he decried “a massive issue with fair ticket prices to live shows lately.”

    “I’ve decided to play a limited number of headline shows next year to which I’ve done all I can to make prices as cheap as possible and to prove to people tickets don’t have to cost $450 to see a good and honest show,” Bryan wrote, cautioning that he didn’t have control of ticket prices for festivals he’ll play.

    The statement doesn’t mention Ticketmaster by name except in the new album title, though he tagged the company in a separate Instagram post displaying the track listing. A message seeking comment from Ticketmaster was not immediately returned.

    Ticketmaster has faced a slew of bad press and scrutiny in recent weeks, notably around the botched rollout of tickets for superstar Taylor Swift’s upcoming Eras Tour.

    A presale event in mid-November crashed the site and left many fans without tickets; the planned general sale for the stadium tour was subsequently scrapped because the dominant ticketing giant had run out of tickets. The debacle has even led several state attorneys general to open investigations.

    Ticketmaster Mexico is also in hot water over a Bad Bunny concert in Mexico City where thousands were left in the cold thanks to fake tickets. Mexico’s consumer protection agency announced an investigation, but Ticketmaster Mexico denied the December concert was oversold and instead blamed false tickets bought through unofficial channels and “temporary interruptions in the ticket reading system, which unfortunately momentarily impeded recognition of legitimate tickets.”

    Experts say the frustration over Ticketmaster’s practices could drive political engagement, which Bryan alluded to in his statement when criticizing inaction while “huge monopolies sit there stealing money from working class people.”

    A songwriter “trying to make ‘relatable music for the working class man or woman’ should pride themself on fighting for the people who listen to the words they’re singing,” he added.

    As of Monday morning, Bryan enjoyed a one-two punch atop Apple Music’s country chart: The 24-track “All My Homies Hate Ticketmaster,” a recording of his Nov. 3 show at Colorado’s Red Rocks Amphitheatre, is at No. 1, followed by his 2022 major label debut, “American Heartbreak.”

    Bryan said he would announce a tour soon.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Some Taylor Swift fans will have 2nd chance to buy tickets, says Ticketmaster – National | Globalnews.ca

    Some Taylor Swift fans will have 2nd chance to buy tickets, says Ticketmaster – National | Globalnews.ca

    [ad_1]

    Though Taylor Swift fans are still seeing Red after Ticketmaster‘s botched ticket sale, the company is giving some Swifties a second chance to score tickets to the singer’s 2023 Eras Tour.

    On Monday, Ticketmaster sent an email out to select fans informing them they will have a “limited opportunity” to purchase no more than two tickets each for one of Swift’s upcoming shows.

    “You were selected for this opportunity because you have been identified as a fan who received a boost during the Verified Fan presale but did not purchase tickets,” the email read.

    Read more:

    2023 Golden Globes nominations: ‘Turning Red,’ Sarah Polley among Canadian nominees

    “We apologize for the difficulties you may have experienced, and have been asked by Taylor’s team to create this additional opportunity for you to purchase tickets,” Ticketmaster continued.

    Story continues below advertisement

    Many fans took to Twitter to share screenshots of the email from Ticketmaster.

    Story continues below advertisement

    The new sale is in response to a fiasco which occurred during the original Swift tour ticket presale, when, after hours of waiting in oft-malfunctioning digital queues, the majority of fans were unable to purchase tickets. Immediately following the presale, scalpers were attempting to resell Swift tickets for up to US$28,000 ($37,430).

    On Nov. 17, Ticketmaster cancelled the general sale for Swift’s U.S. Eras Tour “due to extraordinarily high demands” and “insufficient remaining ticket inventory.”

    Read more:

    Céline Dion reveals diagnosis of rare neurological disease: ‘It’s been really difficult for me’

    Story continues below advertisement

    Ticketmaster used a “Verified Fan” presale to sell Swift tickets — a common practice for the company — that aims to limit the number of scalpers and bots buying tickets to popular shows by providing registered fans with a special ticket-buying code.

    The company claimed more than 3.5 million people registered for the presale. In a statement, Ticketmaster wrote it sold more than two million tickets and fielded 3.5 billion system requests, which is four times its previous peak.

    A group of Swift fans has since filed a lawsuit against Ticketmaster and its parent company Live Nation, claiming the ticketing site engaged in “fraud, price-fixing, and antitrust violations.”

    Swift herself also commented on the mismanaged ticket sale in November and said she and her team are working “to figure out how this situation can be improved moving forward.”

    She claimed it was “excruciating for me to just watch mistakes happen with no recourse.”


    Taylor Swift posted a statement to her Instagram account about Ticketmaster’s sale cancellation on Nov. 17, 2022.


    Instagram / @taylorswift

    On Monday, Ticketmaster issued an apology on its website and said select fans will receive staggered invitations to purchase tickets based on tour dates in each city. All of the invitations will be sent prior to Dec. 23.

    Story continues below advertisement

    Ticketmaster merged with Live Nation in 2010, resulting in control of more than 70 per cent of the primary ticketing and live event venues market.

    Read more:

    Ashton Kutcher and his twin have brutally honest conversation about past rifts, jealousy

    In November, the U.S. Justice Department launched an inquiry into whether Live Nation has abused its power in the multibillion-dollar live music industry. The investigation began before the Swift ticket sale outrage.


    Click to play video: 'Taylor Swift ticket chaos leads to US Justice department probe of Ticketmaster, Live Nation'


    Taylor Swift ticket chaos leads to US Justice department probe of Ticketmaster, Live Nation


    Live Nation denied any wrongdoing and claimed the company “takes its responsibilities under the antitrust laws seriously and does not engage in behaviours that could justify antitrust litigation.”

    Ticketmaster echoed this sentiment in a statement. The company wrote: “Ticketmaster has a significant share of the primary ticketing services market because of the large gap that exists between the quality of the Ticketmaster system and the next best primary ticketing system.”

    &copy 2022 Global News, a division of Corus Entertainment Inc.

    [ad_2]

    Sarah Do Couto

    Source link

  • Ticketmaster’s Taylor Swift Fiasco Triggers Senate Hearing

    Ticketmaster’s Taylor Swift Fiasco Triggers Senate Hearing

    [ad_1]

    In a bipartisan response to Ticketmaster’s Taylor Swift ticket sale fiasco, Sens. Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.) and Mike Lee (R-Utah) announced Tuesday that a Senate subcommittee will hold a hearing to appraise the lack of competition in the ticketing industry.

    The hearing, which has not yet been scheduled, will take place before the Senate Judiciary Subcommittee on Competition Policy, Antitrust, and Consumer Rights, which Klobuchar chairs and Lee serves on as a ranking member. The announcement comes a week after Ticketmaster, which controls the vast majority of ticket sales in the U.S., came under immense scrutiny for bungling its highly anticipated ticket sale for Swift’s upcoming stadium tour.

    “Last week, the competition problem in ticketing markets was made painfully obvious when Ticketmaster’s website failed hundreds of thousands of fans hoping to purchase concert tickets,” Klobuchar said in a statement. “The high fees, site disruptions and cancellations that customers experienced shows how Ticketmaster’s dominant market position means the company does not face any pressure to continually innovate and improve.”

    Lee added that “American consumers deserve the benefit of competition in every market, from grocery chains to concert venues,” and noted the importance of supporting “an entertainment industry already struggling to recover from pandemic lockdowns.”

    In a statement responding to news of the forthcoming hearing, Ticketmaster defended itself, saying it “has a significant share of the primary ticketing services market because of the large gap that exists between the quality of the Ticketmaster system and the next best primary ticketing system.”

    Much of the criticism of Ticketmaster over the past week focused on its 2010 merger with Live Nation, which led to the company controlling an estimated 70% of the ticketing market. Rep. Alexandra Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) was among the first prominent voices to call out the issue amid the Swift ticket sale frenzy last Tuesday, tweeting: “Ticketmaster is a monopoly, [its] merger with LiveNation should never have been approved, and they need to be [reined] in. Break them up.”

    Critics say the company’s apparent monopoly allowed it to get away with providing a subpar service rife with technical glitches that proved unable to meet customer demand. Many people frustrated by last week’s ticket-buying ordeal emphasized that Ticketmaster had approved a set number of customers to access Tuesday’s sale, and thus should have been adequately prepared to meet what it later called a “historically unprecedented demand.”

    Instead, many of those customers were met with various error messages and hourslong wait times when they tried to make their purchases. Fans who couldn’t get through on Tuesday were let down again when Ticketmaster outright canceled its scheduled sale of more tickets later in the week.

    Swift, one of the most popular recording artists of all time, eventually weighed in on the mess, telling fans she was disappointed in Ticketmaster, too.

    “I’m not going to make excuses for anyone because we asked them, multiple times, if they could handle this kind of demand and we were assured they could,” she said of the company. “It’s truly amazing that 2.4 million people got tickets, but it really pisses me off that a lot of them feel like they went through several bear attacks to get them.”

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • The Eras Tour and the Obvious Connection Between Presales and Selling Would-Be Elitism

    The Eras Tour and the Obvious Connection Between Presales and Selling Would-Be Elitism

    [ad_1]

    As Taylor Swift reckons yet again with having the kind of clout that could invoke the swarming of various attorneys general onto Live Nation and Ticketmaster, another deeper issue has come to the surface in the wake of The Eras Tour presale. That issue being, well, presales are founded on the very principle that has wrought so much havoc in this society: elitism. The idea that if you assert yourself as being some kind of “VIP” by spending the money to be as such (whether it’s through paying to exist within a fan club or having an American Express), you can get whatever you want. Money buys everything. That’s the “benefit” of capitalism. Especially for pop stars who know the power of their worth to fans in a parasocial relationship with them. No one knows that worth better than Swift.

    Maybe that’s why she included in her statement on the matter in the aftermath, “It’s really difficult for me to trust an outside entity with these relationships and loyalties, and excruciating for me to just watch mistakes happen with no recourse.” Nonetheless, Swift and other performers are left with little choice but to rely on Ticketmaster for their concert ticket sales. After all, the “entity” and its parent company, Live Nation, control roughly seventy percent of the live ticketing marketplace. Something that might have been prevented twelve years ago upon the sealing of the merger, but that no one appeared too bothered by at the time. Nor has the notion of “presales” seemed to vex any ticket buyers over the years. Instead, music enthusiasts ostensibly relish the opportunity to jump ahead in the proverbial queue. It gives them a delight to know that they’re “beating” other fans to some worshipping-in-person punch.

    As Ticketmaster “politely” describes the concept of a presale, they’re “usually sold from a separate allocation of seats, which may not be the same as the tickets being released to the general public.” This implies, of course, that a bulk of objectively “better” tickets are made available to those “elite” ones. Or, at least, the ones who believe in the American concept that class can be bought (something the British are only slowly coming around to). In the case of Swift’s presale, it’s not about having an AmEx card, but a Capital One card. For Swift, like any adept capitalist, is obliged to cross-promote her endorsement deal with said credit card company. And it was this demographic of Capital One cardholders for whom the second wave of presale tickets catered to as Ticketmaster tried again to lead more casual fans down a primrose path to “hell.” Hell to “First World” ilk inferring that they have to stare at a screen and watch the clock count down the minutes as they “wait in line” for their turn to buy.

    Considering the second presale was meant to commence on Tuesday, November 15th, but was pushed back to Wednesday, it’s clear Ticketmaster persisted in its ill-preparedness and incompetence… once again. So much, in fact, that the ticket sale intended for the general public had to be cancelled. Who needs “average” buyers anyway, when one can sell millions of tickets to “special” people without them? And yet, perhaps there wouldn’t be false ideas of “specialness” if presales were abolished altogether. If everyone was “allowed” the same opportunity to purchase concert tickets at the same time, surely the initial bum-rush wouldn’t be so intense as a result of everyone viewing these lots of tickets as inherently better by sheer virtue of being able to choose from them “first.”

    To this end, juggernauts like Ticketmaster are possibly only feeding into what the people “want.” Or rather, what they want to believe about themselves. That they are somehow more superior to others—a more “diehard” fan, etc.—and should be given the divine right to access the best seats before the hoi polloi. By this logic, one could ask if Ticketmaster can fully be blamed for driving the bloodlust for presales. The answer is, if you don’t build it, they will not come. In short, permitting 3.5 million customers to register for the presale hardly makes anyone feel “special” regarding their preliminary access to tickets. And, the way the presale went, it only served to remind that it is forever people with “real” influence who can actually get what they want easily.

    What’s more, Swift is no stranger to invoking political imbroglios, which began when she finally decided to grow a political voice and speak out against the election of Marsha Blackburn in October of 2018, when the U.S. was faced with yet another extremely close midterm election. Evidencing her power to make website usage surge, in the two days after Swift posted about the importance of registering to vote, vote.org saw a spike of 102,000 new voters registering (seventy percent of whom were under the age of twenty-five). And yes, they knew it was attributable to Swift telling her hundreds of millions of followers, “So many intelligent, thoughtful, self-possessed people have turned eighteen in the past two years and now have the right and privilege to make their vote count. But first you need to register, which is quick and easy to do. October 9th is the LAST DAY to register to vote in the state of TN. Go to vote.org and you can find all the info. Happy Voting!” Cue the onslaught of registering voters. But hundreds of thousands are nothing compared to millions, which, evidently, even the strongest of interfaces can’t withstand.

    With Swift’s popularity manifested anew amid The Eras Tour presale, a fresh spotlight was placed on something political. She being the catalyst for politicians to weigh in on a pop cultural matter (even though government and pop culture have been enmeshed for quite some time—*cough cough* Marilyn and JFK). Specifically, the inability of customers to go elsewhere for their tickets making it all the more apparent in this particular scenario that Ticketmaster’s 2010 merger with Live Nation constitutes a monopoly in violation of antitrust laws. The insanity of trying to secure a presale seat prompted Minnesota Senator Amy Klobuchar to remark, “When there is no competition to incentivize better services and fair prices, we all suffer the consequences.” And yes, what a “tragic” consequence—not being able to attend a little stadium concert.

    Even the presidential level of government weighed in via a quote that Joe Biden said earlier this year. One dredged up by White House Press Secretary Karine Jean-Pierre, who reminded, “Capitalism without competition isn’t capitalism; it’s exploitation.” Does anyone have the heart to tell Biden that capitalism is full-stop exploitation no matter what? Oh well. There’s no stopping this system until it implodes anyway—and Swift’s presale tickets were yet another harbinger of that inevitable implosion. The patent unsustainability of “everyone” (read: a lotta white folks who listen to Swift) wanting to be “elite.”

    This largely due to the American dream still being peddled—the one that insists each person can have a piece of the “pie.” Just not the Taylor pie. Or any other, for that matter. Because the greatest lie ever sold is that “everyone” can be “elite” when the entire reason the “genuine” elite (a.k.a. those with generational wealth) relish being such is because no one else will actually be “let in.” Ergo making the Ticketmaster fiasco a prime example of middle-class aims turning out to be too relatively lofty.

    Swift might do her best to shirk any blame (what with having a song called “Don’t Blame Me” and only admitting to being “the problem” in “Anti-Hero”), but surely she must have some say in kiboshing such Ticketmaster disclaimers as, “Ticket prices may fluctuate, based on demand, at any time.” For this is the woman who can bring down (or at least bring into question) entire institutions with a single post. Even so, Swift herself isn’t immune to the temptations of “more money,” with Forbes commenting of the ticket sale setup, “Swift could have put Swifties’ names on the concert tickets, set a fair price and turned off the resale market… she did not do this because it would not ‘have been as profitable.’”

    Thus, perhaps as her on-again off-again foil, Billie Eilish, is known for touting, maybe Swift truly believes that, regarding some “catering-to-the-little-people-pretending-to-be-VIP” matters, it’s “not my responsibility.” For music, whether “art” or not, remains a cold, hard commodity in the undiscerning eyes of the “free” market.

    [ad_2]

    Genna Rivieccio

    Source link

  • Ticketmaster Apologizes To Taylor Swift And Her Fans After Sales Disaster

    Ticketmaster Apologizes To Taylor Swift And Her Fans After Sales Disaster

    [ad_1]

    Ticketmaster has issued a formal apology to Taylor Swift and her fans following a ticketing catastrophe this week that left millions outraged — and lawmakers demanding answers about the company’s problematic operations.

    The debacle happened after many fans could not purchase tickets for the Grammy winner’s highly-anticipated 2023 “Eras” tour earlier this week, leading Ticketmaster to cancel the general sales.

    “We want to apologize to Taylor, and all of her fans — especially those who had a terrible experience trying to purchase tickets,” Ticketmaster tweeted on Friday. “We feel we owe it to everyone to share some information to help explain what happened.”

    Ticketmaster also provided a link to an extended explanation on its website about why the pop star’s throngs of fans, known as Swifties, couldn’t buy tickets.

    During the presale earlier this week, the site crashed shortly after launching as over 14 million fans, and slews of bots flooded the site, causing service disruptions.

    Sales for Swift’s new tour began on Tuesday, but the high demand rapidly locked customers out of the sale, leaving fans who could not pocket a ticket utterly furious. Some even reported the site sending them back to the beginning of a virtual queue with thousands ahead of them after attempting to purchase seats.

    Numerous customers also complained and reported that the platform was not loading and didn’t grant them access to tickets, even if they had a pre-sale code for verified fans.

    The “Bad Blood” singer addressed the “excruciating” mishap, apologizing to her fans on Friday.

    “It goes without saying that I’m extremely protective of my fans,” Swift wrote in an Instagram story. ”It’s really difficult for me to trust an outside entity with these relationships and loyalties, and excruciating for me to just watch mistakes happen with no recourse,” she said in the message, which didn’t name Ticketmaster but alluded to the ticketing failure.

    “There are a multitude of reasons why people had such a hard time trying to get tickets, and I’m trying to figure out how this situation can be improved moving forward,” she continued. “I’m not going to make excuses for anyone because we asked them multiple times if they could handle this kind of demand, and we were assured they could.”

    She added that it was “truly amazing” that 2.4 million people got tickets.

    “But it really pisses me off that a lot of them feel like they went through several bear attacks to get them,” she wrote.

    On Thursday, Ticketmaster tweeted that “extraordinarily high demands on ticketing systems and insufficient remaining ticket inventory to meet that demand” were to blame and “tomorrow’s public on-sale for Taylor Swift | The Eras Tour has been canceled.”

    The ticket sales and distribution company announced earlier that day that more than 3.5 million people pre-registered for Swift’s Verified Fan sale, the largest in its history, per The New York Times.

    After the cancellation, ticket prices soared on re-sale sites, with seats at various venues running as high as more than $20,000 as of Friday.

    Addressing the incident, the singer wrote on Instagram: “And to those who didn’t get tickets, all I can say is that my hope is to provide more opportunities for us to all get together and sing these songs.”

    She added, “Thank you for wanting to be there. You have no idea how much that means.”

    Swift recently added 17 dates to the U.S. tour, which launches in March in Arizona and ends in August in Los Angeles. The tour will include 52 concerts.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Ticketmaster parent Live Nation under investigation by DOJ; apology issued to Swift fans

    Ticketmaster parent Live Nation under investigation by DOJ; apology issued to Swift fans

    [ad_1]

    The Department of Justice is investigating Ticketmaster parent Live Nation, the company that sparked chaos and anger this week with its mishandling of ticket sales for Taylor Swift’s upcoming “Eras” tour, two people familiar with the matter confirmed to CBS News. On Friday night, Ticketmaster issued an apology via Twitter to Swift’s fans.

    The investigation, which predates the Ticketmaster failure with Taylor Swift ticket sales, is focusing on whether Live Nation is abusing its market dominance in the ticket industry. Ticketmaster’s site crashed during a pre-sale period this week, sparking anger from fans who waited hours to get tickets, only to be disappointed. 

    The Justice Department’s antitrust division has recently contacted music venues and participants in the ticket industry to learn more about Live Nation’s methods, with a focus on whether the company has a monopoly over the industry, according to The New York Times, which earlier reported the investigation.

    This week’s Taylor Swift ticket-sales debacle has sparked renewed calls for more scrutiny of the company. Several lawmakers called for an inquiry into Live Nation and Ticketmaster, which has sold more than 115 million tickets to events in the first nine months of the year, up 37% from 2019.

    Ticketmaster on Friday night apologized to Swift’s fans, saying on Twitter: “We want to apologize to Taylor and all of her fans — especially those who had a terrible experience trying to purchase tickets. We feel we owe it to everyone to share some information to help explain what happened.” 

    The tweet included a link to Ticketmaster’s site, where the company explained why the issues occurred.

    On Tuesday, Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez accused Ticketmaster of acting as a monopoly in ticket sales and called on the company to be broken up, with the New York Democrat tweeting that the 2010 merger between the company and Live Nation “should never have been approved.”

    The site’s crash has also sparked an investigation by Tennessee Attorney General Jonathan Skrmettian, who has launched a probe into how Ticketmaster handled the event.

    After the crash, Ticketmaster canceled Friday’s ticket sales for Taylor Swift’s tour.

    “Due to extraordinarily high demands on ticketing systems and insufficient remaining ticket inventory to meet that demand, tomorrow’s public on-sale for Taylor Swift | The Eras Tour has been cancelled,” the company tweeted

    —With reporting by CBS News’ Ed O’Keefe.

    [ad_2]

    Source link