ReportWire

Tag: tax referendum

  • If Mecklenburg says ‘yes’ to sales tax question on ballots, when will work begin?

    [ad_1]

    Railroad tracks at Camp North End in Charlotte. This site is a potential location for a new station on the Charlotte Area Transit System’s proposed Red Line rail project.

    Railroad tracks at Camp North End in Charlotte. This site is a potential location for a new station on the Charlotte Area Transit System’s proposed Red Line rail project.

    cjordan@charlotteobserver.com

    Work on some projects that would be funded by the referendum on Mecklenburg County’s November ballot could begin as soon as late 2026 or early 2027.

    The referendum on the 2025 ballot asks voters to approve or reject a 1% sales tax rate increase to fund road, rail and bus projects across the county. Road projects likely will be among the first to get started. Rail projects could take the longest.

    If the referendum passes, local leaders anticipate the tax increase will generate more than $19 billion in revenue over the next 30 years. Of that money, 40% will go to rail projects and 20% to the region’s bus system. The other 40% would be divided between Charlotte and Mecklenburg’s six towns for road projects.

    Election Day is Nov. 4, and early voting is already underway.

    Some projects have priority, and some could come together faster because of their size and scope, local leaders say. Here’s what voters should expect when it comes to work starting:

    When would work start on Red Line, other rail projects?

    There’s no exact date yet for when crews would break ground on rail projects if the referendum passes. Existing plans include a general timeline and plans for prioritization.

    The Metropolitan Transit Commission’s plan for rail projects if the sales tax increase pass includes:

    • The Red Line, a commuter rail line from uptown to Lake Norman-area towns
    • The Silver Line, a light rail line from Charlotte Douglas International Airport to Bojangles Coliseum. The line was originally slated to run from Belmont to Matthews but was shortened due to budgetary constraints over the objection of some east Mecklenburg leaders
    • An extension of the Blue Line light rail to Carolina Place in Pineville
    • An extension of the Gold Line streetcar from the Rosa Parks Community Transit Center to Eastland Yards

    The Silver Line could eventually be extended further east, as could the Blue Line to Ballantyne, according to the plan.

    The state law authorizing the referendum says the transit authority must complete at least 50% of the Red Line before completing any of the other rail projects on the docket. The commuter rail project has been in the works for decades but was hindered by a lack of access to railroad tracks and funding.

    The Charlotte Area Transit System told The Charlotte Observer the rail projects are currently in the design stage and “will move as quickly as possible, with advancement within the next decade” if the tax increase passes.

    What about buses, microtransit?

    CATS’ overhaul of its bus system “would begin as soon as possible” if the tax increase passes, with a goal of completing the work within five years, the agency said. The plan, dubbed “Better Bus,” includes $3.8 billion in projects.

    CATS plans to increase frequencies on its 15 busiest bus routes to 15 minutes or less.

    Additional work would include:

    • Bus stop improvements, including 2,000 additional shelters, benches and waiting pads
    • Priority traffic signals for buses on the busiest routes
    • Bus fleet improvements, including 89 new buses
    • Increased express bus service frequency

    The bus money would also fund an expansion of CATS’ microtransit program — a rideshare-like service currently operating in select parts of north Charlotte and Lake Norman-area towns — to 19 other parts of the county.

    Charlotte, towns make plans for road projects

    Road projects funded by the potential sales tax increase could begin in the next year or two.

    Charlotte could begin work on road projects funded by new tax revenue as soon as money starts coming in, “which is anticipated to be in late 2026 or early 2027,” city spokesman Jack VanderToll said.

    Davidson commissioners would decide the specific start dates for projects funded by the sales tax increase if it takes effect based on existing plans, resident feedback and the town’s prioritization process, town clerk Betsy Shores said.

    Specific projects may include a walking path on the east side of Davidson-Concord Road and improvements to multiple intersections. Revenue from the tax increase could also go toward improving pedestrian and bicycle safety, sidewalk maintenance and road resurfacing, she added.

    Matthews expects revenue from the sales tax would be available to spend starting in fiscal year 2028, which begins July 2027, town spokeswoman Maureen Ryan said.

    “In the meantime, we’ll continue planning and prioritizing transportation projects to be ready when the time comes,” she told the Observer.

    Pineville plans to focus on smaller projects “from the onset” with the goal of starting “a more sizable road project” within 18 months to two years of receiving significant revenue, according to assistant town manager Chris Tucker.

    Cornelius leaders plan to prioritize projects and set timelines for those projects if the referendum passes, town spokeswoman Emma Mondo said. Those projects may include “major road projects,” work on intersections and pedestrian and bicycle infrastructure, and maintenance.

    Huntersville spokesman Ethan Smith said the town doesn’t have details yet on when work would begin on projects funded by the potential tax increase.

    Representatives for Mint Hill did not respond to questions from an Observer reporter about the town’s plans for its portion of the roads funding.

    Related Stories from Charlotte Observer

    Mary Ramsey

    The Charlotte Observer

    Mary Ramsey is the local government accountability reporter for The Charlotte Observer. A native of the Carolinas, she studied journalism at the University of South Carolina and has also worked in Phoenix, Arizona and Louisville, Kentucky.
    Support my work with a digital subscription

    [ad_2]

    Mary Ramsey

    Source link

  • Charlotte council member lost primary. Is application for new transit board allowed?

    [ad_1]

    Charlotte City Council District 5 Representative Marjorie Molina speaks during a candidate forum, hosted by the Black Political Caucus of Charlotte-Mecklenburg Saturday, Aug. 2, 2025, in Charlotte, N.C.

    Charlotte City Council District 5 Representative Marjorie Molina applied for the board of trustees that would oversee the region’s new transportation authority. City council is responsible for appointing members to the board.

    For the Observer

    A Charlotte city councilwoman wants to serve on a countywide board she could help appoint, raising conflict of interest questions among her peers.

    Marjorie Molina, who represents east Charlotte’s District 5, told council members at a meeting on Monday she submitted an application for the board of trustees that would oversee the new Metropolitan Public Transportation Authority. A full list of applicants who’ve applied so far hasn’t been publicly released. The authority also will only materialize if voters approve a proposed 1% transportation tax referendum this November.

    State law prohibits sitting elected officials from serving on the board.

    Molina said her knowledge would benefit the board because she is the vice chair of the transportation, planning and development committee. But several council members worried about optics, with Councilwoman Tiawana Brown calling her application “a red flag.”

    “There’s been a lot of confusion at this dais right now, and so I can understand why some people are saying no, and me being one of them,” Brown said.

    Is it a conflict of interest if Molina serves on the transportation board?

    A conflict presents itself if a council member has a financial interest in the outcome of a decision, Interim City Attorney Anthony Fox told council on Monday. He didn’t see Molina’s application as a conflict of interest “at this point,” he said.

    Molina called the role a volunteer position without financial benefit. However, Fox later noted state law does not prohibit board members from setting compensation for themselves.

    Elected officials by law cannot serve “concurrently” on the board. That’s relevant to this situation, too, Fox said. Molina lost reelection to J.D. Mazuera Arias and will leave office before the authority would take effect.

    “It depends on timing and whether or not the member is still an elected official,” Fox said.

    Still, Molina’s tenure overlaps with the council’s deadline to make transportation board appointments. Her last day is Dec. 1, and appointments are due Nov. 24.

    Molina said her colleagues brought valid concerns and pledged to recuse herself from the vote if she was still in consideration. She is weighing whether to withdraw her application.

    “It’s a risk for me,” Molina said. “I risk losing my voice to offer my information, and I risk being a part of the process.”

    Council members had mixed opinions— some encouraging Molina to join in the vote and others supporting a decision to step aside.

    Ed Driggs, who chairs the committee on transportation, said he “wouldn’t be offended” if Molina retained her vote. Driggs thought the issue did not rise to the level of a conflict of interest, he said.

    Councilwoman Renee Perkins Johnson said she would support Molina’s decision to excuse herself over the potential for negative public perception.

    How will the transportation board be appointed?

    Gov. Josh Stein signed the PAVE Act in June, allowing Mecklenburg County to place the referendum on ballots. If passed, it would overhaul the region’s transportation system and raise an estimated $20 billion over the next 30 years.

    Under the PAVE Act, the referendum would establish an independent transit authority with a 27-member board to make transportation decisions. Members will serve for four years, though the inaugural board will include some two-year appointments so terms are staggered.

    The city is responsible for appointing 12 of those members: the mayor chooses two people, the Charlotte Business Alliance recommends two people, Foundation for the Carolinas recommends one member and the city council chooses seven appointees.

    A work group consisting of three council members will lead candidate interviews, then bring recommendations or summaries to the full council to consider and vote on. The exact interview process with the work group has not been finalized.

    Molina said she would “have to recuse (herself)” from voting over perceived conflict if she makes it to the interview stage.

    “In other words, I can’t vote for myself,” Molina said.

    Related Stories from Charlotte Observer

    Nick Sullivan

    The Charlotte Observer

    Nick Sullivan covers the City of Charlotte for The Observer. He studied journalism at the University of South Carolina, and he previously covered education for The Arizona Republic and The Colorado Springs Gazette.

    [ad_2]

    Nick Sullivan

    Source link