ReportWire

Tag: reporter

  • Nancy Guthrie kidnapping investigation draws scrutiny as case drags on

    [ad_1]

    Nancy Guthrie had been missing less than three days when family members and reporters, and even an Amazon delivery worker, could be seen wandering onto her property, with drops of her blood still staining the front entryway.

    It’s been nearly two weeks since the 84-year-old mother of “Today” host Savannah Guthrie was abducted. With no suspects in custody as of Saturday, scrutiny is growing over how authorities have handled the case.

    Some questions have focused on Pima County (Ariz.) Sheriff Chris Nanos and his department, which was the first to respond when Guthrie was reported missing from her Tucson home Feb. 1. Since then, Nanos has been the leading law enforcement communicator on the investigation, including after reports emerged of ransom notes demanding millions of dollars in cryptocurrency for Guthrie’s return.

    The global spotlight is now on him.

    “I’m not used to everyone hanging on to my every word and then holding me accountable for what I say,” Nanos said at a press conference early in the probe. “This is really, for me, pretty new.”

    Critics pointed out his department opened up the crime scene a day after Guthrie was reported missing and sent vital evidence across the country to be analyzed for free, and the sheriff was seen at a weekend college basketball game while a ransom deadline still hung over the family.

    President Trump has even weighed in on the issue.

    “It was a local case originally, and they didn’t want to let go of it, which is fine,” President Trump said when asked about the case at the White House on Friday. “It’s up to them, it’s really up to the community, but ultimately where the FBI got involved, I think, you know, progress has been made.”

    Guthrie was discovered missing after she didn’t show up at a friend’s house to watch a church service. She was taken from her home without any of her heart medication, and it’s unclear how long she can survive without it.

    Though she initially was considered missing, the urgency to quickly find Guthrie pulsed through the first days of media coverage because of her heart condition. So it came as a surprise to some observers that just a day after she’d been reported missing, Nanos declared the crime scene clear and released the home back to the family.

    Forensic workers had processed the ranch-style home for evidence, including DNA and fingerprints, but could not recover images from a Ring camera because the family did not pay for a subscription to back up the recordings, Nanos said.

    Afterward, as the home stood unguarded, reporters, photographers and others wandered the property, walking to the front door and capturing video of blood drops along the porch.

    The crime scene eventually was closed again so the FBI could conduct its own search, and Nanos told reporters opening the scene up the first time may have been premature.

    “Monday morning quarterback. Absolutely. I probably could have held off on that,” Nanos said at a news conference, with top FBI agents flanking him.

    Sheriff‘s deputies eventually were stationed outside home, but even so, a pizza delivery driver walked food that had been ordered for someone in the neighborhood up to the door of the Guthrie home. On Friday, a company showed up to service Guthrie’s backyard pool, which was accommodated at the “request of the Guthrie family,” the sheriff’s department said.

    Breaks in the investigation have come in fits and starts.

    After searching the home last week, FBI technicians have been processing evidence from in and around it. Testing revealed the blood drops outside the door belonged to Guthrie.

    Then, a series of ransom notes arrived in the tip boxes of two Tucson television stations and TMZ, seeking $4 million and $6 million in bitcoin, and included details about Guthrie’s home.

    The fact that law enforcement announced Guthrie disappeared and then publicly gave credence to reports she was being held for ransom put authorities at a disadvantage, said Adam Bercovici, who has worked multiple kidnappings as the former supervisor of the Los Angeles Police Department’s special investigations unit.

    “It is a debacle,” he said. “This kidnapping is one of the worst cases of incompetence I have seen.”

    With so much information floating around, Bercovici said, it would be difficult to verify a legitimate ransom demand. Indeed, not long after news about the ransom notes broke, officials said a man in Hawthorne sent an imposter demand to the Guthries. He has been charged with a federal crime.

    Much is still unknown about the details inside the investigation and exactly what evidence detectives have collected. Because of this, it will take time to fully assess their tactics and truly understand the complexity of the case.

    The first big break in the case came Tuesday, when the FBI released surveillance videos of someone approaching Guthrie’s door wearing a holstered gun, ski mask and backpack. The videos, recovered by Google engineers, provided the first look at Guthrie’s kidnapper and last less than a minute. More than 4,000 tips flooded law enforcement agencies in the 24 hours after the images were broadcast.

    By the following evening, sheriff‘s investigators were detaining a 36-year-old man after a traffic stop south of Tucson. Sheriff’s officials announced they obtained a court-approved search warrant for his Rio Rico home, immediately raising expectations among those closely watching the case.

    But those hopes soon were deflated.

    Surrounded by the throng of cameras and reporters, investigators and FBI forensic technicians swarmed the man’s home. His mother-in-law, under the glare of camera lights, declared him innocent, saying she didn’t know who Savannah Guthrie was, and told them “you won’t find anything here, we have nothing to hide.”

    By the next morning, the man was free and his house cleared of investigators. The Times is not naming him because he has not been arrested or accused of any wrongdoing.

    “I hope they get the suspect because I am not it,” the man told reporters. “And they better do their job and find the suspect that did it so they can clear my name.”

    On Friday night, authorities served a search warrant at a home in Tucson and swarmed a parked Range Rover. In the end, officials said no arrests were made.

    Investigators are casting an even wider net to find photos, videos and any other clues. Other people in the area should expect to be detained and questioned, Nanos told local station KOLD.

    On Thursday, authorities revealed a series of images of men in the dark with backpacks near cars and homes. About two miles from the Guthrie home, investigators discovered a glove on the ground, then several others farther from the home, the sheriff’s department announced Friday. They’ll all be analyzed for DNA in hopes it leads to the 84-year-old grandmother. The department said other DNA found at the home did not match Guthrie or anyone in close contact with her, and investigators are working to identify who it belongs to.

    Meanwhile, the FBI doubled its reward for information this week to $100,000 and released a description of the person seen at her front door.

    “The suspect is described as a male, approximately 5’9” – 5’10” tall, with an average build. In the video, he is wearing a black, 25-liter ‘Ozark Trail Hiker Pack’ backpack,” the bureau said. More than 13,000 tips have flowed into the bureau.

    On Friday, the sheriff’s department sought to quash rumors that there was a divide between local and federal investigators, centered around the handling of evidence and which lab it should be sent to.

    “Our strong partnership is critical, and we remain fully committed to this collaborative investigation. To ensure consistency and streamline testing, evidence requiring forensic analysis is being sent to the same out-of-state lab that has been utilized since the beginning of this case,” the Pima County Sheriff’s Department said in a statement. “This decision was discussed with and agreed upon by local FBI leadership.”

    But Nanos himself expressed frustration about the pace of the probe.

    “It’s exhausting, these ups and downs. But we will keep moving forward,” he told the New York Times. “Maybe it’s an hour from now. Maybe it’s weeks or months or years from now. But we won’t quit. We’re going to find Nancy. We’re going to find this guy.”

    [ad_2]

    Richard Winton, Hannah Fry

    Source link

  • Venezuela opposition leader Machado says she ‘presented’ her Nobel Peace Prize to Trump

    [ad_1]

    Venezuelan opposition leader María Corina Machado said Thursday that she “presented” her Nobel Peace Prize medal to President Trump during a private meeting at the White House, but he has not changed his view that she does not have the support to lead her country.

    Machado, who won the prize last year for her work to promote democracy in Venezuela, said she presented the 18-carat gold medal to Trump as a “recognition of his unique commitment to our freedom.” It is unclear whether the president, who has been fixated on getting the prize in recent year, accepted it. The Nobel Peace Center has maintained the award cannot be transferred.

    The gesture was made on the day the two leaders met for the first time at the White House. The highly anticipated get-together came as the United States has allowed top deputies of deposed president Nicolás Maduro’s regime to remain in charge as Trump oversees the transition of power.

    White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt told reporters that Trump went into the meeting without any expectations, other than to have a “frank and positive discussion about what’s taking place in Venezuela.”

    Leavitt added that Trump continues to assert that Machado does not have the “support” or “respect” to lead Venezuela, an assessment he first made on the day of Maduro’s capture to the surprise of many Venezuelans.

    “At this moment in time, his opinion on that matter has not changed,” Leavitt said at a news briefing.

    While Leavitt described Machado as a “remarkable and brave voice for many of the people in Venezuela,” she also said the United States had found an “extremely cooperative” partner in Maduro’s handpicked vice president, Delcy Rodríguez, who is serving as acting president of Venezuela.

    “They have met all of the demands and requests of the United States and the president,” Leavitt said, noting that the Venezuelan government already agreed to release political prisoners and reached a $100-billion deal to rebuild Venezuela’s energy sector.

    As Machado left the White House, the scope of the discussions between her and the president remained unclear. She did not take questions from the reporters, but a few of them were able to capture a moment on video when she was greeted by supporters outside the White House. She told them: “Know that we can count on President Trump for Venezuela’s freedom.”

    She then left to meet with a bipartisan group of U.S. senators on Capitol Hill. It was after this meeting that Machado told reporters she had presented the medal to the president.

    Sen. Rick Scott (R-Fla.) was one of 14 senators who met with Machado. After the meeting Scott said Machado was “very appreciative of the U.S. military” capturing Maduro and was pushing for “free and fair elections and free press.”

    “We have got to continue to understand that Delcy Rodriguez is not the leader, she was never elected as a president, she is still the leader of drug cartels,” Scott said. “We need to make sure we hold her accountable.”

    It appears unlikely that much will change for Machado after meeting with Trump, who largely has sidelined her and Edmundo González Urrutia, the opposition candidate who won the 2024 presidential election that was stolen by Maduro.

    Days after Maduro was captured, Machado told CBS News the people of Venezuela had “already chosen” González Urrutia as the rightful leader of the country and that they were “ready and willing to serve our people, as we have been mandated.”

    Trump, however, has maintained that before elections can take place in Venezuela, the United States needs to “fix” the country.

    Asked if the president was committed to holding elections in Venezuela, Leavitt said Trump hopes to see “elections in Venezuela one day” but did not have a timeline for them yet.

    Trump says he is happy with his administration’s working relationship with Rodríguez. At a White House event Wednesday, Trump called Rodríguez a “terrific person.”

    The praise came after Trump said he had a “very good call” with her that morning that left him feeling hopeful that the United States and Venezuela could have a “spectacular” working relationship.

    Rodriguez, in turn, used her first state of the union address Thursday to promote oil industry reforms that would drawn in foreign investment, which is in line with the Trump administration’s goals. She also criticized the Washington officials and said there was a “stain on our relations” but said she was open to strengthening the relationship.

    “Let us not be afraid of diplomacy,” with the U.S., Rodriguez said in Venezuela.

    [ad_2]

    Ana Ceballos

    Source link

  • Trump ‘inclined’ to keep ExxonMobil out of Venezuela

    [ad_1]

    President Donald Trump said Sunday that he is “inclined” to keep ExxonMobil out of Venezuela after its top executive was skeptical about oil investment efforts in the country after the toppling of former President Nicolás Maduro.“I didn’t like Exxon’s response,” Trump said to reporters on Air Force One as he departed West Palm Beach, Florida. “They’re playing too cute.”Video above: President Trump asks oil giants for $100B to restart Venezuela’s oil industryDuring a meeting Friday with oil executives, Trump tried to assuage the concerns of the companies and said they would be dealing directly with the U.S., rather than the Venezuelan government.Some, however, weren’t convinced.“If we look at the commercial constructs and frameworks in place today in Venezuela, today it’s uninvestable,” said Darren Woods, CEO of ExxonMobil, the largest U.S. oil company.An ExxonMobil spokesperson did not immediately respond Sunday to a request for comment.Also on Friday, Trump signed an executive order that seeks to ensure that Venezuelan oil revenue remains protected from being used in judicial proceedings.The executive order, made public on Saturday, says that if the funds were to be seized for such use, it could “undermine critical U.S. efforts to ensure economic and political stability in Venezuela.” Venezuela has a history of state asset seizures, ongoing U.S. sanctions and decades of political uncertainty.Getting U.S. oil companies to invest in Venezuela and help rebuild the country’s infrastructure is a top priority of the Trump administration after Maduro’s capture.The White House is framing the effort to “run” Venezuela in economic terms, and Trump has seized tankers carrying Venezuelan oil, has said the U.S. is taking over the sales of 30 million to 50 million barrels of previously sanctioned Venezuelan crude, and plans to control sales worldwide indefinitely.Seung Min Kim reported from West Palm Beach, Florida.

    President Donald Trump said Sunday that he is “inclined” to keep ExxonMobil out of Venezuela after its top executive was skeptical about oil investment efforts in the country after the toppling of former President Nicolás Maduro.

    “I didn’t like Exxon’s response,” Trump said to reporters on Air Force One as he departed West Palm Beach, Florida. “They’re playing too cute.”

    Video above: President Trump asks oil giants for $100B to restart Venezuela’s oil industry

    During a meeting Friday with oil executives, Trump tried to assuage the concerns of the companies and said they would be dealing directly with the U.S., rather than the Venezuelan government.

    Some, however, weren’t convinced.

    “If we look at the commercial constructs and frameworks in place today in Venezuela, today it’s uninvestable,” said Darren Woods, CEO of ExxonMobil, the largest U.S. oil company.

    An ExxonMobil spokesperson did not immediately respond Sunday to a request for comment.

    Also on Friday, Trump signed an executive order that seeks to ensure that Venezuelan oil revenue remains protected from being used in judicial proceedings.

    The executive order, made public on Saturday, says that if the funds were to be seized for such use, it could “undermine critical U.S. efforts to ensure economic and political stability in Venezuela.” Venezuela has a history of state asset seizures, ongoing U.S. sanctions and decades of political uncertainty.

    Getting U.S. oil companies to invest in Venezuela and help rebuild the country’s infrastructure is a top priority of the Trump administration after Maduro’s capture.

    The White House is framing the effort to “run” Venezuela in economic terms, and Trump has seized tankers carrying Venezuelan oil, has said the U.S. is taking over the sales of 30 million to 50 million barrels of previously sanctioned Venezuelan crude, and plans to control sales worldwide indefinitely.

    Seung Min Kim reported from West Palm Beach, Florida.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Venezuelan migrants sent to El Salvador demand justice after US judge ruling

    [ad_1]

    Men who were part of the group of Venezuelan migrants that the United States government transferred earlier this year to a prison in El Salvador demanded justice on Friday, days after a federal judge in Washington ruled that the Trump administration must give them legal due process.The men told reporters in Venezuela’s capital that they hope legal organizations can push their claims in court. Their press conference was organized by Venezuela’s government, which had previously said it had retained legal services for the immigrants.On Monday, a federal judge ordered the U.S. government to give legal due process to the 252 Venezuelan men, either by providing court hearings or returning them to the U.S. The ruling opens a path for the men to challenge the Trump administration’s allegation that they are members of the Tren de Aragua gang and subject to removal under an 18th century wartime law.The men have repeatedly said they were physically and psychologically tortured while at the notorious Salvadoran prison.”Today, we are here to demand justice before the world for the human rights violations committed against each of us, and to ask for help from international organizations to assist us in our defense so that our human rights are respected and not violated again,” Andry Blanco told reporters in Caracas, where roughly two dozen of the migrants gathered Friday.Some of the men shared the daily struggles they now face — including fear of leaving their home or encountering law enforcement — as a consequence of what they said were brutal abuses while in prison. The men did not specify what justice should look like in their case, but not all are interested in returning to the U.S.”I don’t trust them,” Nolberto Aguilar said of the U.S. government.The men were flown to El Salvador in March. They were sent to their home country in July as part of a prisoner swap between the Trump administration and the government of Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro.Camilla Fabri, Venezuelan vice minister of foreign affairs for international communications, said Maduro’s government is working with a bar association in the U.S. and “all human rights organizations to prepare a major lawsuit against Trump and the United States government, so that they truly acknowledge all the crimes they have committed against” the men.

    Men who were part of the group of Venezuelan migrants that the United States government transferred earlier this year to a prison in El Salvador demanded justice on Friday, days after a federal judge in Washington ruled that the Trump administration must give them legal due process.

    The men told reporters in Venezuela’s capital that they hope legal organizations can push their claims in court. Their press conference was organized by Venezuela’s government, which had previously said it had retained legal services for the immigrants.

    On Monday, a federal judge ordered the U.S. government to give legal due process to the 252 Venezuelan men, either by providing court hearings or returning them to the U.S. The ruling opens a path for the men to challenge the Trump administration’s allegation that they are members of the Tren de Aragua gang and subject to removal under an 18th century wartime law.

    The men have repeatedly said they were physically and psychologically tortured while at the notorious Salvadoran prison.

    “Today, we are here to demand justice before the world for the human rights violations committed against each of us, and to ask for help from international organizations to assist us in our defense so that our human rights are respected and not violated again,” Andry Blanco told reporters in Caracas, where roughly two dozen of the migrants gathered Friday.

    Some of the men shared the daily struggles they now face — including fear of leaving their home or encountering law enforcement — as a consequence of what they said were brutal abuses while in prison. The men did not specify what justice should look like in their case, but not all are interested in returning to the U.S.

    “I don’t trust them,” Nolberto Aguilar said of the U.S. government.

    The men were flown to El Salvador in March. They were sent to their home country in July as part of a prisoner swap between the Trump administration and the government of Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro.

    Camilla Fabri, Venezuelan vice minister of foreign affairs for international communications, said Maduro’s government is working with a bar association in the U.S. and “all human rights organizations to prepare a major lawsuit against Trump and the United States government, so that they truly acknowledge all the crimes they have committed against” the men.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Ronald Reagan biographer, legendary California journalist Lou Cannon dies

    [ad_1]

    For the record:

    2:49 p.m. Dec. 20, 2025An earlier version of this story included a photo caption that identified journalist Sander Vanocur as Lou Cannon.

    Journalist and author Lou Cannon, who was widely considered the nation’s leading authority on the life and career of President Reagan, died Friday in a Santa Barbara hospice. He was 92.

    His death was caused by complications from a stroke, his son Carl M. Cannon told the Washington Post, where his father served for years as a White House correspondent.

    The elder Cannon covered Reagan’s two-term presidency in the 1980s, but his relationship with the enigmatic Republican leader went back to the 1960s, when Reagan moved from acting to politics.

    Cannon interviewed Reagan more than 50 times and wrote five books about him, but still struggled to understand what made Reagan who he was.

    “The more I wrote,” Cannon told the Reno Gazette-Journal in 2001, “the more I felt I didn’t know.”

    Cannon was born in New York City and raised in Reno, Nev., where he attended the University of Nevada in Reno and later San Francisco State College.

    After service in the U.S. Army, he became a reporter covering Reagan’s first years as governor of California for the San Jose Mercury News. In 1972, Cannon began working for the Washington Post as a political reporter.

    Cannon recalled first encountering Reagan in 1965 while assigned to cover a lunch event for reporters and lobbyists and being surprised by Reagan’s command of the room when he spoke.

    Reagan was beginning his campaign for governor by proving he could answer questions and “was not just an actor reading a script.” At the time, the word actor was “a synonym for airhead. Well, Reagan was no airhead,” Cannon said in a 2008 interview at the Richard Nixon Presidential Library & Museum.

    To Cannon’s surprise, the reporters and lobbyists mobbed Reagan after the event was over to get his autograph. Cannon introduced himself.

    “I remember those steely eyes of his. I thought he had this great face, but his eyes are tough,” Cannon said. “His eyes are really something.”

    On the phone later, Cannon’s editor asked him what he thought of Reagan. He replied, “I don’t know anything, but if I were running this thing, why would anybody want to run against somebody that everybody knows and everybody likes? Why would you want him to be your opponent?

    “I predicted that Reagan was going to be president, but I didn’t have any idea he was going to be governor,” Cannon said. “I was just so struck by the fact that he impacted on people as, not like he was a politician, but like he was this celebrity, force of nature that people wanted to rub up against. It was like seeing Kennedy again. They wanted the aura, the sun.”

    In 1966, Reagan was elected governor by a margin of nearly 1 million votes and Cannon found himself “writing about Ronald Reagan every day.”

    Reagan’s political opponents in California and Washington consistently underestimated him, assuming the former actor could be easily beaten at the ballot box, Cannon said. Reagan ran for president unsuccessfully twice, but had the will to keep trying until he won — twice.

    “Reagan was tough, and he was determined, and you couldn’t talk him out of doing what he wanted to do,” Cannon said. “Nancy couldn’t talk him out of what he wanted to do, for god’s sakes. And certainly no advisor could or no other candidate. Ronald Reagan wanted to be president of the United States.”

    Cannon’s first book on the president, “Reagan,” was published in 1982. In 1991 he published “President Reagan: The Role of a Lifetime,” which is regarded as a comprehensive biography of the 40th president.

    Cannon also authored a book about the LAPD and the 1992 Rodney King riots in Los Angeles, in addition to chronicling a range of tales over the years, including the federal bust of a 1970s heroin kingpin in Las Vegas.

    Mr. Cannon’s first marriage, to Virginia Oprian, who helped him research his early books, ended in divorce. In 1985, he wed Mary Shinkwin, the Washington Post said. In addition to his wife, he is survived by three children.

    [ad_2]

    Roger Vincent

    Source link

  • ABC13’s Melanie Lawson shares personal news

    [ad_1]

    HOUSTON, Texas (KTRK) — I first walked through the doors of ABC13 in 1978 as an intern. My first time on the air was a mistake. I had gone out and shadowed a reporter and asked if I could ask some questions and get some information.

    He said, “Sure,” and I came back and wrote up the story, got it edited, and handed it in. The producer put it on TV without anyone asking much of anything.

    The news director was screaming down the hall at me when he saw my reporting on the air. He wasn’t happy, but he said the story wasn’t too bad, and he let me stick around.

    I took a detour to law school and enjoyed a short stint practicing law, but the spark I felt each day at KTRK couldn’t be replicated. The light I felt wasn’t in a law office, it was telling stories – stories about the things that mattered to you and your families.

    And now, a few short years later, that light still shines bright for the important work we do here each and every day.

    It’s time to share that light in a different way, as I focus on my family and my next chapter. I’ll step away from the anchor desk and my time here at the end of January.

    Being here at ABC13 is a path I have not walked alone. My wonderful partner in life, John, has been a rock for whom I am eternally grateful. He’s been through my ups and downs – spoke his mind the whole time – but been there nonetheless.

    My father and mother, whose incredible love story is to be admired and cherished is an inspiration to love and perseverance.

    And of course, my entire family who have been along for this wild ride that we call television news.

    I’ve been fortunate enough to have a front-row seat to history in ways I never could have imagined. That bright-eyed, eager, curious intern never knew she would get to interview presidents and politicians and people who had more influence and sway than I sometimes realized.

    I’ve had the privilege of telling your stories, the tragedies and triumphs, the stories that have shaped the very fabric of who we are here in Houston. The light that shines from me – to tell your stories, right the wrongs, and hold people accountable shines on here at ABC13.

    There’s so much in our future, my friends, as Houston grows and we thrive together. I hope that I’ve been able to inspire you, as my friends, and I hope I’ve been able to inspire a young generation of journalists and storytellers that the world is not quite as big as it may seem. That sometimes, you do the work, you hand it in, and they just might put it on TV.

    The bad news – you’re stuck with me a little longer here, so don’t call dibs on my desk just yet.

    A note from ABC13:
    Please join us in celebrating Melanie as we look back at her unmatched career. After the holidays, we’re calling January “The Month of Mel” with special surprises for her each day.

    Copyright © 2025 KTRK-TV. All Rights Reserved.

    [ad_2]

    Melanie Lawson

    Source link

  • Cleaning worker who was mom of 4 fatally shot after mistakenly going to wrong home, police say

    [ad_1]

    A 32-year-old cleaning crew worker who went to the wrong home to work was shot and killed in Whitestown, Indiana, on Wednesday morning, police said. The worker, identified as Maria Florinda Rios Perez , according to NBC News and WTHR-TV, had tried to use keys in her hand to get into a new client’s home when she was shot.The home she intended to go into was behind the one where she and her husband went, The New York Times reported. Rios’ brother told reporters that his sister fell into her husband’s arms after being shot through the door of the home.”It’s so unjust. She was only trying to bring home the daily bread to support her family,” Rios told NBC News. “She accidentally went to the wrong house, but he shouldn’t have taken her life.”She was a mother of four children, with the youngest being 11 months old.Officers initially responded to a report of a possible home invasion about 20 miles outside of Indianapolis. Police are still investigating what happened. “This remains an active and ongoing investigation into the fatal shooting. The facts gathered do not support that a residential entry occurred,” the police department said in a statement on its Facebook page.

    A 32-year-old cleaning crew worker who went to the wrong home to work was shot and killed in Whitestown, Indiana, on Wednesday morning, police said.

    The worker, identified as Maria Florinda Rios Perez , according to NBC News and WTHR-TV, had tried to use keys in her hand to get into a new client’s home when she was shot.

    The home she intended to go into was behind the one where she and her husband went, The New York Times reported. Rios’ brother told reporters that his sister fell into her husband’s arms after being shot through the door of the home.

    “It’s so unjust. She was only trying to bring home the daily bread to support her family,” Rios told NBC News. “She accidentally went to the wrong house, but he shouldn’t have taken her life.”

    She was a mother of four children, with the youngest being 11 months old.

    Officers initially responded to a report of a possible home invasion about 20 miles outside of Indianapolis. Police are still investigating what happened.

    “This remains an active and ongoing investigation into the fatal shooting. The facts gathered do not support that a residential entry occurred,” the police department said in a statement on its Facebook page.

    This content is imported from Facebook.
    You may be able to find the same content in another format, or you may be able to find more information, at their web site.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Sen. Alex Padilla says he won’t run for California governor

    [ad_1]

    U.S. Sen. Alex Padilla announced Tuesday that he will not run for California governor next year, ending months of speculation about the possibility of the Democrat vying to succeed Gov. Gavin Newsom.

    “It is with a full heart and even more commitment than ever that I am choosing to not run for governor of California next year,” Padilla told reporters outside his Senate office in Washington.

    Padilla instead said he will focus on countering President Trump’s agenda in Congress, where Democrats are currently in the minority in both the House and Senate, but hope to regain some political clout after the 2026 midterm elections.

    “I choose not just to stay in the Senate. I choose to stay in this fight because the Constitution is worth fighting for. Our fundamental rights are worth fighting for. Our core values are worth fighting for. The American dream is worth fighting for,” he said.

    Padilla said his decision was influenced by his belief that under President Trump, “these are not normal times.”

    “We deserve better than this,” he said.

    Many contenders, no clear favorite

    Padilla’s decision to bow out of the 2026 governor’s race will leave a prominent name out of an already crowded contest with many contenders but not a clear favorite.

    For much of the year, the field was essentially frozen in place as former Vice President Kamala Harris pondered whether she would run, with many donors and major endorsers staying out of the game. Harris said at the end of July that she wouldn’t run. But another potential candidate — billionaire developer Rick Caruso — remains a question mark.

    Caruso said Monday night that he was still considering running for either governor or Los Angeles mayor, and will decide in the next few weeks.

    “It’s a really tough decision,” Caruso said. “Within a few weeks or so, or something like that, I’ll probably have a decision made. It’s a big topic of discussion in the house with my kids and my wife.”

    Major Democratic candidates include former Orange County Rep. Katie Porter, former U.S. Health and Human Services Secretary Xavier Becerra, former Los Angeles Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa, current California Supt. of Public Instruction Tony Thurmond, former state Controller Betty Yee and wealthy businessman Stephen Cloobeck. Riverside County Sheriff Chad Bianco and conservative commentator Steve Hilton are the most prominent Republicans running.

    Amid fire recovery aftermath, immigration raids and a high-octane redistricting battle, California voters have yet to turn their attention to next year’s gubernatorial matchup, despite the vast power that Newsom’s successor will wield. California is now the world’s fourth-largest economy, and policy decisions in the Golden State often have global repercussions. Newsom is nearing the end of his second and final term.

    Recent polling shows the contest as wide open, with nearly 4 in 10 voters surveyed saying they are undecided, though Porter had a slight edge as the top choice in the poll. She and Bianco were the only candidates whose support cracked the double digits.

    Candidates still have months to file their paperwork before the June 2 primary to replace Newsom.

    June incident brought attention

    Known for soft-spoken confidence and a lack of bombast, Padilla’s public profile soared in June after he found himself cuffed by federal agents, at the center of a staggering viral moment during a news conference by Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem.

    Despite identifying himself, Padilla was tackled after trying to interrupt Noem with a question. The manhandling of California’s senior senator was filmed by a staffer and broadcast around the world, provoking searing and widespread condemnation.

    Days later, Vice President JD Vance joked about the incident and referred to Padilla — his former Senate colleague — as “Jose Padilla,” a misnaming that Padilla suggested was intentional and others characterized as racist.

    The event put Padilla on the national spotlight and rumors of Padilla’s interest in the gubernatorial race ignited in late August.

    Padilla told reporters Tuesday that he received an “outpouring of encouragement and offers of support for the idea” of his candidacy and that he had “taken it to heart”

    Alongside his wife, Angela, the senator said he also heard from many people urging him to keep his fight going in Washington.

    “Countless Californians have urged me to do everything I could to protect California and the American Dream from a vindictive president who seems hell-bent on raising costs for working families, rolling back environmental protections, cutting access to healthcare, jeopardizing reproductive rights and more,” he said.

    Padilla said he had listened.

    “I will continue to thank them and honor their support by continuing to work together for a better future,” he said.

    Ceballos reported from Washington and Wick from Los Angeles. Times staff writer Noah Goldberg in Los Angeles contributed to this report.

    [ad_2]

    Ana Ceballos, Julia Wick

    Source link

  • 9 juveniles injured in multi-vehicle crash in Orange County, FHP says

    [ad_1]

    9 juveniles injured in multi-vehicle crash in Orange County, FHP says

    BREAKING NEWS. WE BEGIN WITH BREAKING NEWS TONIGHT. A WILD, HORRIFIC SCENE FOLLOWING A CRASH IN ORLANDO, PUTTING NINE CHILDREN IN THE HOSPITAL. I’M JESSE PAGAN AND I’M MICHELLE IMPERATO. THIS ALL HAPPENED ON RALEIGH STREET AND CAMPANELLA AVENUE, AND THAT’S WHERE OUR GAIL PASCHALL-BROWN IS LIVE TONIGHT. GAIL. NEIGHBORS ARE SHAKEN UP ABOUT THIS. MICHELLE. THIS IS SOMETHING ELSE I TELL YOU RIGHT NOW. THEY ARE SHAKEN UP. THEY JUST TOOK THE CARS AWAY FROM THE SCENE. NOW, NEIGHBORS, AS ONE OF THEM, WHO IS A MOTHER HERSELF, NOT OF THOSE INJURED, SAID THAT, YOU KNOW, IT WAS HORRIBLE. AND SHE DESCRIBED THE THE CHILDREN WITH THEIR BLOODY INJURIES. AND, YOU KNOW, IT’S JUST ONE OF THOSE SITUATIONS WHERE IT’S JUST BAD. BOTTOM LINE, ORANGE COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT, ORLANDO POLICE DEPARTMENT, AS WELL AS THE FLORIDA HIGHWAY PATROL, CAME OUT HERE IN MASS TO THIS CRASH, WHICH HAPPENED AROUND 630 TONIGHT. IT’S HEARTBREAKING. I PRAY THAT THE FAMILY IS OKAY. I STAYED ALL THE WAY TILL THEY TOOK THE BABIES BECAUSE THE ONE BABY I HAD, THE ONE BABY TRYING TO KEEP HER ALIVE, TO KEEP HER AWAKE. I MEAN, THAT’S TRAGIC. IT’S SAD. NEIGHBORS WHO DIDN’T WANT TO BE ON CAMERA TELL US THEY HEARD SCREECHING AND THEN SAW THIS RED ALFA ROMEO HIT THIS NISSAN ALTIMA FROM BEHIND. THE FLORIDA HIGHWAY PATROL SAYS THE NISSAN RAN OFF THE ROAD AND THEN SLAMMED INTO A TREE AND HIT IT AGAIN. AND HE COULDN’T EVEN, LIKE, STOP. LIKE HE. YOU JUST. HEARD. I’M SORRY. AND. HE WAS ON THE PHONE LITERALLY, BECAUSE THAT’S WHAT — ME OFF. AND THEN ALL THE KIDS WAS RUNNING OUT OF THE CAR, SHE SAID. THE DRIVER OF THE RED CAR WAS SPEEDING. THE CRASH HAPPENED EASTBOUND ON RALEIGH STREET AND EAST OF CAMPANELLA AVENUE IN ORANGE COUNTY, RIGHT IN FRONT OF ANOTHER NEIGHBOR’S HOUSE. SHE SAYS SHE HAD JUST PULLED OUT BEFORE THE CRASH HAPPENED. IT WAS AROUND 8 OR 9 KIDS IN THE CAR. SOMEONE PASSED AWAY. AN ADULT WAS THERE AS WELL. YES. THE ADULT, THEY HAD A SHE WAS IN THE CAR. THEY HAD TO, LIKE, PRY THE CAR OPEN, PULL HER OUT. THEY HAD TO, BECAUSE WE LIVE RIGHT THERE AT THE HOUSE WHERE IT HAPPENED. SO AND THEY HIT THE TREE AND HE HAD A GREEN BEER BOTTLE AND I DON’T SEE IT, BUT HE █THREW IT OUT THE WINDOW. IT LOOKS LIKE HE STAYED ON THE SCENE. YEAH HE DID. HE HAD NO CHOICE BECAUSE NOBODY WOULDN’T LET HIM LEAVE BECAUSE HE WAS ALL IN FRONT OF HIS CAR TO TELLING HIM TO GET OUT, BUT HE WAS STILL ON HIS PHONE. NINE CHILDREN WERE TAKEN TO ARNOLD PALMER HOSPITAL WITH SERIOUS INJURIES. RIGHT NOW, WE’RE STILL WAITING TO GET PATIENT REPORTS ON ALL OF THOSE TONIGHT, RESIDENTS OUT HERE TELL ME THAT SOME OF THOSE YOUNGSTERS WHO WERE INJURED WERE AS YOUNG AS FOUR AND FIVE YEARS OLD. I ALSO JUST FINISHED TALKING TO A NURSE WHO LIVES HERE ACROSS THE STREET. AND SHE AMONG OTHER RESIDENTS. SHE SAID IT WAS A TEAM EFFORT TO TRY TO HELP THOSE CHILDREN AS MUCH AS THEY COULD.

    9 juveniles injured in multi-vehicle crash in Orange County, FHP says

    Updated: 4:00 PM EDT Oct 24, 2025

    Editorial Standards

    Several fire rescue agencies responded to a multi-vehicle crash that left nine juveniles injured on Thursday night, according to the Florida Highway Patrol.“It’s heartbreaking, and I pray that the family is OK. I stayed all the way until they took the babies cause the one baby I had, the one baby to try to keep her alive, keep her awake, I mean, that’s tragic, it’s sad,” one neighbor said.The two-vehicle crash occurred at Raleigh Street and Ivy Lane in the Richmond Heights neighborhood of Orange County, involving a Nissan Altima and an Alfa Romeo.Neighbors who didn’t want to be on camera tell WESH 2 they heard screeching and then saw that the red Alpha Romeo hit the Nissan Altima from behind.FHP says the Nissan ran off the road and then slammed into a tree.The crash happened eastbound on Raleigh Street and east of Campanella Avenue, in Orange County, right in front of another neighbor’s house.The neighbor said she had just pulled out before the crash happened. “So it was about eight kids, nine kids in a car. Someone passed away. An adult was there as well, yes adult she was in the car, they had to pry the car open and pull her out, cause we live right there in the house where it happened,” the neighbor said. According to FHP, the children were transported to Orlando Health Arnold Palmer Hospital for Children with severe injuries.On Friday, Orlando Health announced that four children have been discharged, while five additional children and one adult remain in the hospital.

    Several fire rescue agencies responded to a multi-vehicle crash that left nine juveniles injured on Thursday night, according to the Florida Highway Patrol.

    “It’s heartbreaking, and I pray that the family is OK. I stayed all the way until they took the babies cause the one baby I had, the one baby to try to keep her alive, keep her awake, I mean, that’s tragic, it’s sad,” one neighbor said.

    The two-vehicle crash occurred at Raleigh Street and Ivy Lane in the Richmond Heights neighborhood of Orange County, involving a Nissan Altima and an Alfa Romeo.

    Neighbors who didn’t want to be on camera tell WESH 2 they heard screeching and then saw that the red Alpha Romeo hit the Nissan Altima from behind.

    FHP says the Nissan ran off the road and then slammed into a tree.

    The crash happened eastbound on Raleigh Street and east of Campanella Avenue, in Orange County, right in front of another neighbor’s house.

    The neighbor said she had just pulled out before the crash happened.

    “So it was about eight kids, nine kids in a car. Someone passed away. An adult was there as well, yes adult she was in the car, they had to pry the car open and pull her out, cause we live right there in the house where it happened,” the neighbor said.

    According to FHP, the children were transported to Orlando Health Arnold Palmer Hospital for Children with severe injuries.

    On Friday, Orlando Health announced that four children have been discharged, while five additional children and one adult remain in the hospital.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • ‘Without precedent’: Virtually all news outlets reject restrictive Pentagon press policy

    [ad_1]

    An extraordinary new policy from the Defense Department that equates basic reporting methods to criminal activity has prompted a revolt among Pentagon journalists that could leave the nation’s largest agency and the world’s largest military without a press corps.

    The new policy, from Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, is a dramatic departure from historic standards at the department, which previously required credentialed reporters to sign a simple, single-page document laying out safety protocols.

    Replacing that document is a 21-page agreement that warns reporters against “soliciting” information, including unclassified material, without the Pentagon’s official authorization, characterizing individuals who do so as a “security risk.”

    The policy would force journalists and media organizations to refrain from publishing any material that is not approved by the military — a clear violation of 1st Amendment protections to free speech, lawyers for media outlets said.

    Major news organizations including the New York Times, Washington Post and Wall Street Journal, as well as right-leaning outlets such as Newsmax and the Washington Times, have refused to sign the document, with only one far-right outlet — the cable channel One American News — agreeing to do so.

    The Los Angeles Times also will not agree to the policy, said Terry Tang, the paper’s executive editor.

    In a rare joint statement, ABC, CBS, CNN, Fox News and NBC said that the policy “is without precedent and threatens core journalistic protections.”

    “We will continue to cover the U.S. military as each of our organizations has done for many decades, upholding the principles of a free and independent press,” the news outlets said.

    But Hegseth, who has aggressively pursued leaks and sources of unfavorable news stories since the start of his turbulent tenure as secretary, has doubled down in recent days, posting emojis on social media waving goodbye as media organizations have issued statements condemning the policy. Journalists were given a deadline of 2 p.m. PDT on Tuesday to either sign the document or relinquish their credentials.

    It is unclear whether it will be viable for the Pentagon to maintain the policy, leaving the secretary without a traveling press corps to highlight his official duties or public events. And it is also uncertain whether President Trump approves of the extreme measure.

    At a White House event Tuesday, Hegseth said that the policy was “common sense” and that he was “proud” of it. He said credentials should not be given to reporters who will try to get officials “to break the law by giving them classified information.”

    Asked last month whether the Pentagon should control what reporters gather and write, Trump said “no.”

    “I don’t think so,” Trump said, adding: “Nothing stops reporters.”

    But Trump said Tuesday that he understands why Hegseth is pushing for the new policy.

    “I think he finds the press to be very destructive in terms of world peace and maybe security for our nation,” Trump said. “The press is very dishonest.”

    The widespread revolt has generated a show of solidarity from the White House and State Department correspondents associations, which characterized the Pentagon policy in a joint statement Monday as an attack on freedom of the press.

    “Access inside the Pentagon has never been about convenience to reporters,” the statement reads. “The public has a right to know how the government is conducting the people’s business. Unfettered reporting on the U.S. military and its civilian leadership provides a service to those in uniform, veterans, their families and all Americans.”

    Beyond the restrictions on media outlets, the Pentagon has taken a series of steps this year to try and identify officials who are deemed disloyal or who provide information to reporters.

    In April, the Pentagon dismissed three top officials after an investigation into potential leaks related to military operational plans. That same month, Hegseth’s team began subjecting officials to random polygraph tests, a practice that was temporarily halted after the White House intervened, according to the Washington Post.

    Then, in October, the Pentagon drafted plans to renew the use of polygraphs and to require thousands of personnel to sign strict nondisclosure agreements that would “prohibit the release of non-public information without approval or through a defined process.” The nondisclosure agreements include language that is similar to what reporters are being asked to sign by Tuesday.

    Notably, many of Hegseth’s plans to target leaks have been leaked to news outlets, probably contributing to the Defense secretary’s suspicion about whom he can trust.

    The timing of his efforts are also noteworthy, as they gained traction after he personally shared sensitive details about forthcoming strikes in Yemen in a private Signal group chat that mistakenly included a reporter from the Atlantic. Hegseth also shared information about the attacks in a separate Signal chat that included his wife, a former Fox News producer who is not a Defense Department employee.

    Hegseth denied that any classified information was shared in the chat. Yet the situation led to an internal review of whether the disclosures were in violation of Defense Department policies.

    The Pentagon has taken an even more aggressive approach to restricting reporters’ access than the White House, which months ago took control over press operations from the White House Correspondents Assn. — an independent group that had organized the White House press corps for decades.

    Still, the White House has refrained from implementing changes to the briefing room seating chart, evicting outlets from workspaces within the White House complex or revoking press passes, after facing a legal challenge over an attempt to bar one major outlet — the Associated Press — from covering some presidential events at the beginning of Trump’s second term.

    Trump, meanwhile, has continued to single out individual outlets he dislikes. On Tuesday, for example, the president refused to take questions from ABC News because he said he did not like how a news anchor had treated Vice President JD Vance.

    “You’re ABC Fake News,” Trump said at a public appearance in the White House. “I don’t take questions from ABC Fake News!”

    [ad_2]

    Michael Wilner, Ana Ceballos

    Source link

  • Gunmen kill two, injure 12 in a shootout in a crowd in Alabama capital city’s downtown

    [ad_1]

    Gunmen kill two, injure 12 in a shootout in a crowd in Alabama capital city’s downtown

    Um, first of all, on behalf of City of Montgomery, I want to thank all of you for coming here for the work, uh, you’re doing, uh, to cover all the things that have been taking place in our city. I wanna thank our city council president Ci Yahon, uh, also Councilor Beer, Councilor Zymanski, uh, County Commissioner Constanza, um. sugar Cunting here. Sorry about that *** about my my contacts are. I thought that was you, um, but, uh, thank you for being here. That, that means *** lot. I appreciate that. Um, We wanna think everybody’s been helping us, uh, uh, partners with Lea, ATF, uh, FBI, all of our federal partners, Capitol Police, everybody’s been involved, and certainly, uh, we wanna thank the community, uh, for what, uh, they have been, uh, sharing with us and letting us know since, uh, these unfortunate circumstances. Um, I just wanna, uh, be very brief and I’ll turn it over to you, to you great boys and we’ll open it up for any questions that that you may have. Last night’s incident, uh, was unfortunate but it was certainly, uh, avoidable. Uh, it was an incident of bad judgment, uh, selfish behavior, um, and one that truly put the lives of many, many. Uh, innocent people are in danger. Uh, this weekend we have had thousands of people come, uh, to our city, uh, for things like the state fair, uh, for things like homecomings and other football games, uh, that we’ve had going on along with other events that have been going on around the city. 99.99% of people have been great. Uh, our community partners have been great. Our law enforcement has been. Uh, outstanding, uh, covering these events, uh, and covering things in the city, uh, our community has been great, uh, *** lot of great fun that has been had, uh, and shared, uh, along these last several days, uh, but unfortunately it only took, uh, one or two bad people with bad intentions, uh, to change not only their fortunes but the fortunes of Of many, many other innocent people, um, people who really should not have been caught in anything that, uh, took place and something again that, uh, we prepared for, talking with two great boys leading up to this weekend, talking about coverage. At the state fair talking about coverage uh at ASU’s Homecoming talking about coverage at the uh Morehouse Tuskegee Classic, uh, and talking about coverage in our neighborhoods for those who are just going about their, their day, um, our law enforcement officers were not off. Um, they’re encouraged not to be off, strongly encouraged, uh, they adhere to that. They sacrifice, they missed some ball games, they missed some birthdays, um, because they were protecting the serving this community, um, and even with that and having *** couple of units within, uh, *** short distance, um, we had something like this happen because of *** disagreement. Uh, because of something that again we believe, uh, could have been avoided and should have been. And I want the community to be well aware, uh, that for us this is not acceptable. Uh, we’re not gonna normalize this. Uh, we’re gonna do whatever we can not only to arrest those responsible, uh, we’re gonna do whatever we can to arrest those connected, um, in any way. Uh, who knew what may have happened or who knew what could take place. Um, we’re not going just to stop with those folks that, um, were pulling the trigger last night. Uh, for us it’s *** lot deeper than that because the impact is *** lot deeper than that. The impact is beyond those who are physically. Injured, those who are mentally and emotionally uh injured, those who are working downtown, uh, those who live downtown, those who do business uh and own businesses downtown, um. That’s *** problem for us. And so, uh, see great boys and I have been in talks, uh, consistently throughout the night, uh, about this issue, uh, this incident, and we’re gonna leverage all the resources, uh, and all the partnerships, uh, that we have to that. So I want us just to be, uh, very clear that this is not gonna be accepted here, uh, and we’re gonna look at every uh issue that we can, we’ll look at every ordinance that. We can talk to the city council about if we find some bad actors. Uh, then we’re gonna talk to them about that and that’s what their support which they’ve already, uh, agreed to, to give, uh, but we’re gonna look at everything that we can because this is not, uh, fit Montgomery, this is not who we are, this is not who we have been, um, when you have all the events going on that we had, uh, this weekend, uh, with *** lot of celebration, *** lot of economic impact, *** lot of goodwill. And support for charities, uh, Kiwanis Club, so many other organizations, um, that are doing good things. It is just, uh, to me, uh, very problematic that it only took one or two people *** few seconds, uh, to do something very stupid. Uh, and very dangerous, uh, that costs the lives of, of two people right now, uh, and may impact many, many others, uh, moving forward. And with that, I just want to say to the families, uh, we were praying for you since we heard about this. Uh, our church, uh, pray for the entire community. I know faith leaders who reached out to me, uh, all around this community. did so as well. We’re grateful uh for those prayers and we’re grateful for uh the actions uh as well of innocent people who came to help their neighbor who came to help people and strangers. They didn’t even know, uh, before this circumstance before this situation. So, um, we’re going to be in touch with those families and we’re gonna make sure those families understand um how much, uh, we grieve with them. Um, and we know that it may not be the same as, uh, someone who has lost that person, uh, who they were just talking to minutes or hours before and won’t have that opportunity again, uh, and for those that are injured, it may not. Necessarily have the same outcome but who have physical and mental scars, uh, that will have to be dealt with, uh, moving forward. So, uh, we’re gonna talk to them and I plan to reach out to them specifically myself and we’re gonna continue to make sure this is *** top line uh priority. Uh, not only for our city, but our community. And I think by looking at the leadership that we have here again across the city and across the county, uh, you can tell, uh, that this is all hands on deck and everybody’s on one accord to do whatever needs to be done, uh, to make sure we bring the criminals. To justice swiftly and that we make sure justice is served severely, uh, to send *** message that this is not gonna be accepted, uh, in Montgomery now or at any time moving forward. Uh, with that, I’ll turn over to Chief Rave voice to provide, uh, any, uh, facts and details, uh, and then I’ll come back and I’ll take questions, uh, and I’ll close it out with some other thoughts, uh, that we want to share as well. Chief. I’m collecting my thoughts right now because of how angry I am. So I’ll ask your forbearance as some of that might show through. Last night at 11:31. Our officers responded. The reports of shooting Shootings that they could hear. Over there at the corner of 5th and commerce Streets. As *** result of this incident, we now presently have 14 confirmed total victims of this shooting. Of those 14 confirmed victims. 2 have are deceased, 2 are no longer with us. 17 year old Jeremiah Morse. is unfortunately no longer with us. 43 year old Shalanda. Williams is no longer with us, both deceased from this incident. And of course, as I stated, there were 14 total victims. These two were among them. So of course, My feelings of anger and my heart is out there for their families. 5 of the victims. Have now life threatening. That’s where we are presently. 5 have life-threatening injuries. 7 have non life-threatening injuries. Breakdown on this that bothers me and every victim bothers me. I take it very personally. But this is of note. 7 of the victims are under the age of 20. The youngest of these victims is 16 years old. We know there are multiple calibers of ammunition used in this incident. We recovered multiple shell casings from multiple different weapons. We also recovered multiple weapons from the scene of this incident. We know that at least 2 of the victims, 2 of these 14 people were armed in this incident. This started As *** result of an individual, one of these 14. Who we believe was targeted. In which basically an exchange of gunfire. Erupted When that exchange erupted, Multiple people in the crowd, this is *** crowded area. Pull their own weapons. And started discharging. As you can imagine, that could be *** very chaotic situation. And every weapon has to be accounted for. And every piece of evidence has to be processed. Now, One thing I want to make perfectly clear. We are bringing every resource to bear. I’ve been in communication with multiple federal agencies from the ATF to the FBI to the US Attorney’s Office. I’ve been in communication with the US Marshals. My officers have been in communication with the Alabama Fusion Center. In communication with Montgomery County Sheriff’s Office. I’ve been in communication with Alabama Law Enforcement Agency. And of course we’ve been in communication with the Montgomery County DA’s office as well. I’m making this clear because every one of these agencies stands with us. And is working with us to pursue the individuals. Responsible. Now, One thing I want to make clear too. Is that purposefully, I will not release any information that I believe will compromise this investigation. So when we do open it up, I will answer questions as well as I can, but I want people to understand this investigation we are laser focused on. And we are not gonna let anything distract us. From going after the individuals responsible. I’ve been in communication with Crime Stoppers. And one thing I want people to be aware of, if anybody has any information. You have responsibility for this community and to help the people in this community to give that information to us. And I would ask people to call Crime Stoppers at 215O. That’s an area code 334. The number actually is 215-786-7. They are offering *** $5000 reward. Any information that leads to an arrest in this case. Now we have been questioning multiple individuals in relation to this case. As we piece this together, because we really have to reconstruct it. To know exactly what took place and to make sure that appropriate charges are brought. When we Make the charges. But I cannot emphasize enough. That we will pursue every avenue. Available to us and we’re doing it uns senselessly. I mean, I’m sorry, I’m not never ceasing. All of us have been up for hours and hours and hours, and I will tell you. We are not gonna stop until we get this case solved. If anybody has any video information. Or videos they believe that they have taken that will help us in this investigation. I’m going to give you all. An email address. It’s spelled star, center. At Montgomery AL.gov. Again, that is Star Center. At Montgomery AL.gov. My personal opinion. this was very, very much preventable because Individuals who pulled the trigger are responsible for this. They carried those weapons into this crowd. And at any time they could have walked away from this or walked away from whatever was happening, but they did not. And *** bullet On fire does not come back. Montgomery is *** good town full of fighters, full of good people. We will not tolerate this. I’ll guarantee you that. Thank you. I wanna make *** couple of clarification on my thing. Chiefly again all the men and women in Montgomery Police Department, um, Alabama Law Enforcement Agency, Montgomery County Sheriff’s Office, um, alcohol, tobacco, firearms, FBI, Capitol Police, DA’s office, everybody that, uh, has been *** part of this over these last several hours. also recognize some of the council members that were here. I know we had councilor member council members. Uh, Riley Johnson and Mitchell were also out there last night, uh, with the, with some of the families, uh, as well, so I want to recognize, uh, them, and again that’s about 3/4 of the council that was that has either been there or here. So it shows you again, level of involvement, level of seriousness and we’re taking this as *** city. Um, but I do wanna make *** couple of points of clarification I’ve seen in some early reporting. Uh, this was in no way related, uh, to the events that were happening. Uh, in the city was not related to Alabama State University’s Homecoming. Uh, I went to Alabama State University’s Homecoming. Uh, I had an opportunity to meet with community members, leaders, alumni, uh, fans, as well as the president, uh, and his staff, and, uh, board of trustee leaders. Great event, uh, fantastic for the city, and again, very few problems, uh, we had there. Uh, this was not connected in any way to Uh, the Morehouse Tuskegee Classic, uh, again, had the opportunity to, uh, talk with the community leaders, the president, uh, both institutions, corporate leaders, uh, Walmart and others, um. Great event, great crowd, um, really, really great feedback seeing people of all ages, uh, come out to, to witness what has been ***, uh, big weekend planned in our city for, um, several weeks. So I want to be clear that where this happened was not *** sanctioned party or gathering by any uh of those uh entities, um, either the HBCU classic Weekend. Uh, or Alabama State University’s homecoming or Morehouse Tuskegee’s homecoming whatsoever. Uh, that’s *** local place with local establishment and unfortunately, most of, uh, the victims, uh, as far as we know, uh, were local and unaffiliated, uh, with the institutions or, um, those, uh, activities that I mentioned. They were not connected to the Alabama State Fair. So, uh, again, *** lot of people are out there, uh, *** lot of preparation, *** lot of work, *** lot of sacrifice on behalf of dedicated, uh, law enforcement professionals, um, nothing out of the ordinary there. So, uh, I wanna, I wanna stress that because I think sometimes, uh, there’s *** lot of things out there in particularly on social media that potentially people try to, uh, craft and play detective. Uh, we’ve got. Great detectives here and throughout, uh, who are already on this and I just wanna make sure that’s clear so as not to besmirch any of those uh organizations uh that were doing so much, uh, and have done so much to great people here to our city. Um, second thing, you know, I, I wanna say. Is that um when you have people who are willing to, to, to draw, draw down uh in *** crowded area, that’s reckless uh and dangerous enough. Uh, when you have people who uh are willing to do that with police officers in plain sight, uh, within short, um, Distance, uh, I’m not sure if those people can be, uh, reaclimated to our society. Uh, I’m not sure that they can be productive citizens in our society. Uh, if you’re, if you’re that determined, um, to try to take someone’s life at the expense of, of others, I’m not sure those are the people that we can allow back uh into our society because the risk is just too great. Um, and I want to thank again our law enforcement professionals and everybody who helped us identify, uh, some suspects who helped us identify, uh, and apprehend, uh, some people who were, uh, close by, some people who had guns on them. Now I would have to be determined whether not those guns were uh connected to this crime, but certainly had guns on them. And we’re gonna find others, but when people are, are that reckless, uh, when it comes to uh human life, that’s *** problem, uh, and that’s *** problem that that’s gonna be *** lot deeper than what we’ll talk about at least here today, but it’s something that I think we have to talk about as *** community, we have to have some tough conversations uh around that. Who wants to be saved and who can be saved? Not everybody wants to be saved. And we have to find out who those people are, um, and we have to take things in our, uh, perspective to be proactive to protect this community. Too many good people here working hard, uh, doing great things to help this community prosper and move forward, uh, for it to be, um, just set on fire by people who are just committed to destruction. And committed to bringing about physical harm regardless of who it comes to, uh, because of their short-sighted emotions and how they deal with conflict and how they deal with disagreements. Con conflict and disagreements are as old as mankind. How we deal with it is the only thing that changed. And so it used to be *** time when somebody, there was *** disagreement, might be *** fist fight. I’m born and raised in Montgomery. I’ve seen plenty of them and it was that. And now we’re in this place where you don’t do that because everybody feels like they have to have *** gun. Everybody feels like this is wild wild west and so you lose innocent people over something very simple, uh, that could be worked out that even maybe without pushing and shoving could be de-escalated. And we have what we have now, innocent people uh who are harmed and many more who are impacted. So I just wanted to to mention that, uh, and then finally I want to say this $5000 isn’t enough to bring the cowards to justice. I put $20,000 on that, um, and we’re gonna make that $25,000 maybe 50. We had, we had another $25,000 from from our city council president, from the council. That’s here. Thank you. Thank all of you. Um, and this shouldn’t be about reward money. Uh, you should feel compelled to come forward because innocent people were harmed last night, um, and most, most, uh, were just in the, in the wrong place at the wrong time. Could have been any one of us. I was just you know, out of town at the weekend before. No different, um. And we gotta make sure that again we don’t accept this and so um I thank our city council for for just doing that. But $50,000 is what we’re where we’re gonna be right now, um, and we want those who know, uh, to come forward, not because you want the money, because you know it’s what’s right. Um, and you know it’s the right thing to do for people, uh, who should not have been in this situation that have been horrified and more importantly, to remove the people who are behind this. I wanna be very clear, we’re gonna see this all the way through, and if there’s legislation we need to change, we’ll change legislation. Uh, there are things we need to change in the bail and bond laws, and we’ll change the bail and bonds laws. Um, we’re not going to just sit here and Do the same thing over and over and over again. We’re not gonna do that. That’s not fair to the victims, it’s not fair to the families, it’s not fair to this community. Um, we’re just not gonna do that. So if we have to tie things up, and we have to take *** different position, then so be it. We’ll do that, but, uh, dangerous criminals and people who are this reckless uh with human life don’t deserve to be free. Uh they don’t deserve to walk our streets. Um, that, that’s not anything you are promised. That, that’s something that uh is an opportunity. As *** blessing. And if you can’t do that, then you don’t need to be on our streets, period. So with that I’ll open up uh for any questions you may have for myself, to great boys, um, and we’ll take them there. Chief Marty Roney Montgomery Advertiser, could you uh verify the name spellings of the deceased victims, please, sir? I’m sorry. Certainly, sir. Um, Jeremiah Morse is from the spelling I have at present, uh J E R E M I *** H, last name M O R R I S. And the other victim is Shalanda Williams, spelled S H *** L *** N D ***, last name W I L L I *** M S. Were they both Montgomery residents? Uh, at present we believe so. Um, All right. Any other questions? Do we have any indication of what led to the initial altercation? At present We know, like I stated earlier, one individual got targeted. And then an exchange of gunfire took place. We are still investigating the state, the motives and the reasons behind some of that. We do have leads coming in though that are helping us shape that, but I can’t say further than that because I, like I said before, I’m not gonna compromise anything because this is gonna be *** very complex investigation with multiple suspects when we finish it up. How many officers were working in the downtown area last night? I would have to refer to my worksheets, but I know that we have at least 5 in close proximity to this case. When you say close proximity, I mean I’m I’m talking within like running distance. OK, but like I stated, I, I would have to check if you want an exact number, but I can talk about the folks who responded to it and how fast they did and they were very fast on that. When the mayor said that there was an officer not 50 ft away, he was right. I’m gonna ask this question with an apology beforehand because I know how hard y’all been working and how nerves are wrong. But my editor told me to ask you, does this mean downtown Montgomery is unsafe? OK, can I answer that first, you get your thoughts. Let me say this. You know, I think when you get in *** car accident, you say driving is unsafe. You know, um, I, I, I don’t, I don’t think that, uh, downtown Montgomery is unsafe. Let me be very clear about that. Um, I think we have some reckless and careless people, uh, who did something very stupid last night that cost two people their lives and multiple people, uh, impacts on their lives from now until. Um, I think the investment in technology, uh, that we have, uh, increased this over the last several months, um, has proved beneficial. I think our police department chief great Boys outreach with Downtown Business Association has been productive. Uh, I think our conversations with major stakeholders, uh, in that area whether it’s the, uh, State Capitol Police. Uh, whether it’s those that assist with the retirement systems of Alabama’s, uh, buildings as well as our entrepreneurs and small business owners. There’s been *** great, great collaboration, uh, of teamwork and effectiveness there. Uh, the fact that we are having discussions right now in our city council about investing, uh, hundreds of millions of dollars to further grow downtown, uh, through tourism and things that benefit our city overall. Um, I think it’s an indication that Uh, we believe downtown, uh, it’s safe and again, I’ll go back to what I said before. You had thousands of people. Uh, who were, who were downtown. We had the investor Doctor Anthony Lee over at Huntingdon, uh, on Friday. I mean just *** great, I mean you couldn’t really ask to me for *** better weekend whether an activity uh involved to see people from all around coming uh through our city and coming through, uh, these spaces for different reasons at different times. What we had were, um, some individuals who decided that they were gonna put. Innocent lives at risk because of whatever issues or whatever disagreements or whatever conflicts they had, and I don’t think it would have mattered if it was on 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue or it was on the steps of the Capitol. I think that that was going to happen and what we have to do is we have to make sure that from our standpoint we send, we send *** strong message, *** direct message that this is not acceptable and if you do it in our city, you’re gonna pay *** heavy price. And you’re gonna pay *** heavy price and the public is gonna be aware of it. If it means making sure that there’s *** public example made of the people that are behind this, so be it. You just heard the city council that’s what we just said relates to uh this reward. This should not be about that, uh, as I said *** second ago, but if that’s what it takes to bring these people to justice, if it takes again of advocating to our judges, takes advocating to our legislature about some laws that need to be. about repeat violent offenders, even if it’s just in Montgomery County, then we’ll do whatever we have to do. So I don’t think that’s an indication on uh downtown. I think it’s an indication on the individuals who are responsible for this. This is not about uh the location. This is about the people involved, and this is about the recklessness and the decisions they made that have impacted many, many other people beyond themselves and they have to be held accountable for that. And we’re gonna do everything in our power to make sure they’re held accountable to it and to make sure other people understand just what that accountability costs, right? Because if you take two lives here. You impact as many as they have, again, it wouldn’t matter if it was around the corner from my house. The same thing should be, should apply that you ought to have *** level of respect and dignity for human life, that’s what being *** civilized society. Demands and if you can’t be in *** civilized society, you don’t need to be on our streets, period. And so this is not about um downtown, it’s about the individuals uh combined. Chiefre boys and I talked about technology from drones to cameras leading up to this. And again, by and large across the board, our partners in law enforcement. Our community has responded very, very well. Couldn’t be more proud uh of how this community embraced everything that that was going on here, um, all at one time. Uh, men and women in Montgomery Police Department, outstanding job. All of our partners, the law enforcement outstanding, um, and again, you got people that are from here to down this hall. And they’re willing to do something. I don’t know there’s anything, *** drone or camera or any other amount of men and women are gonna do, uh, but I also think that that will help us close this case very swiftly and I think the community’s partnership and the community’s interest, uh. In it, uh, will help as well. We got *** lot of great feedback, *** lot of offers of support, and those are people who don’t uh necessarily come downtown all the time, they don’t necessarily uh stay out past 9 or 10 o’clock, uh, but they know this is their community. And they have pride in their community. They want to make sure that we don’t let uh some people disrupt and destroy some of the things that too many people have put *** lot of time and effort and energy uh in doing. So, uh, I want to respond to that question because again I, I think it’s very. Very important for us to understand when we partner with our city, we partner with our county, uh, and our business owners and our faith leaders and grassroots leaders here is to serve everybody, wherever part of town that may be and unfortunately sometimes. People with bad intentions tend to go uh where innocent people are, but they have to pay *** price. They have to pay *** heavy price, and they have to pay it swiftly, and we need to make sure that they do that whatever the cost. And if $50,000 doesn’t get it, we’ll go out and we’ll get some more. But we’re gonna find the people who are behind this, and I promise you there will be some changes. There will be some changes because this is gonna be an example for some people. We’re not gonna keep coming back here having these press conferences because stupid people do stupid stuff that causes people’s lives. We’re not gonna keep doing that. They’re reckless and they’re dangerous, they don’t need to be on the streets. They don’t, they need to be somewhere where it doesn’t matter what they do, what they think about themselves because they should not have that impact on others. And so whatever that cost is, so be it. No, to follow up on that question, um, is it responsible for the city of Montgomery to continue to bring thousands of people in when even though these weren’t related, it wasn’t related to anything, you still have the Ferris wheel right around the block from where this happened, and we have low numbers of police officers they’re doing the best they can. I understand that, but. 5 officers, you know, for an area that large, it, it seems like *** low number. I mean, do we need to Not bring events like this into the city until we have more officers. I’ll let you get to the the manpower uh issues. I’m not sure how many people are are are knowing down on that shift, uh, at that time. Uh, but no, I, I think the city of Montgomery, we, we, we can walk and chew gum at the same time. Uh, we’re *** city that, you know, really has tremendous pride, um, in what we do and, you know, uh. I didn’t get *** chance to go out to the fair yet. I was looking forward and looking forward to getting out there, but I go out there every year. The thing that I’m always impressed about from the time I was growing up here, uh, is what the Kiwanis Club, uh, does for so many people, uh, not just in our city. But in our area and I say that because the fair is *** big part of uh bringing in funds and revenue. That’s *** big operation that our police department and uh sheriff’s department, so many folks work hard on year round. And to have that along with uh Alabama State University’s homecoming, to have that along with, you know, having dignitaries in town for Huntington Colleges, uh, presidential investiture. To have that along with the uh Morehouseki Classic is something that um our men and women in law enforcement are trained to do. Uh, they are committed to do it and I think for them and and our partners, uh, there’s been *** great amount of collaboration. Uh, with our, uh, partners in law enforcement and also the community. Uh, we’ve got retired law enforcement officers, um, point out things to me, uh, and tell me different things and it’s great. Uh, we’ve had people, I’ve had people call and text me, uh, who are retired, uh, to talk about things they’re seeing in their neighborhood and their community at an event, um, so we always have additional eyes and ears, um, in. Uh, when we’re doing things like this, and I think when you have the type of working relationship that’s not transactional, that really is about working with um Uh, Capitol Police, uh, Alabama Law enforcement, uh, agency that’s also, uh, working with our federal partners because we’re in constant contact with them, uh, I think it makes these type of events, uh, certainly not only possible, uh, moving forward, but I think it encourages us. Um, the fact that, you know, again I, I, I know that the number you mentioned, uh, that you brought up before, um. You know, these are people who listen, this could have been much worse. Um, these are people who have no regard for how many law enforcement officers we have, um, they they’re, they’re that type of, of, of individual and I think for us to have uh the sheriff of our county here to have our police chief here again it shows the collaboration, it shows the working relationship. Uh, that we have that doesn’t matter about jurisdictional roles to have our city council, our county commission partners here. It doesn’t matter. We all live here. Uh, we all want to see, uh, this community thrive whether it’s *** concert or whether it’s *** race on the river, uh, what’s *** 5K for charity, uh, it doesn’t matter. We want to see those things, uh, take place and I feel very confident and felt confident. Uh, going in, uh, to this weekend that we were more than prepared, uh, and that we were ready to handle, uh, just about anything that would come up and Chief and I probably talked, um, several times throughout the week, uh, several times on Friday, and then *** couple more times, even yesterday, uh, about just kind of where things were, and I wanna say this, the act of one or two individuals coming back to your point, um. Doesn’t cloud the entire community. Community has been great. Community has been helpful, has been outgoing, very, very supportive across the city, uh, and, and we commend them for that, and they have responded. Uh, you’ve got some of the messages I’ve gotten to not approving and not liking what’s happening and not gonna settle for that as well. They’re as angry as we are. Uh, and I appreciate that because they understand what we’re doing in this city and in this region and they understand what so many folks uh around the walls and those that are here, uh, in our community do to try to bring events, uh, to downtown to other parts of Montgomery, uh, so that you know you can win with your family, you can align with your friends, you can’t invite, uh, people here and I wanna say it’s not let it uh give final marks on the manpower thing. You know, um, if what happened here only happened here, I might be concerned. Um, and although I’m concerned about why this happened, uh, I know enough and I talked to enough mayors around the state and enough mayors around the country to know that we all deal with it. It’s all it’s our worst nightmare probably short of *** law enforcement officer or *** first responder, um, having something serious happen to them. Uh, no one wants to have the term mass shooting. Uh, affiliated with their community, uh, and we all talk about that consistently about how you prepare, how you plan, and then how do you respond. And I think the fact that we put so much time, effort, and energy in that, uh, not only helped us within two hours, uh, corro some people who, uh, they don’t have some ties to this. They have some ties to something bad to happen. Uh, I can promise you that they’re not just innocent bystanders. Because of that planning, preparation and response. So I think we’re more than capable of being able to. Handle events like this and others. Uh, we’ve done it with Buckmasters. Uh, we do it with, uh, the salute the Veterans Bowl. We do it with concerts. We do other events here all the time with the help of everybody, uh, that’s in this room, and I’m proud to be able to work with all of them, uh, in various capacities to get those things done. We’ll continue to do that. We don’t gonna let one or two bad apples, uh, spoil *** bunch, we’re gonna find those that are rotten and we’ll get them the hell out of here. I, I’d like to address something here and I want to clarify. When I was stating that there were 5 within, you say walking distance, that doesn’t, that number did not include the folks who also responded in their vehicles. As the mayor just alluded, we had one officer who was so quick on the scene, he was transporting *** victim before. You can say the ambulances got there. The response was so quick, OK, we were taking people. And do investigative, you could say custody short distance away. Yeah I, I, while I can’t tell you how fast I got here, I know I got here pretty fast and this response of our units and our officers. This was not *** manpower issue. We had plenty of manpower. We had darn Aaliyah out there, ATF, other federal partners, Sheriff’s department. I mean, we had *** huge response on this and very quick response. It’s something you got to understand with these types of situations. When you know how fast the magazine can be emptied out of *** handgun, an automatic handgun, that incident might have only taken 1 or less than 60 seconds. So this was an issue and, and one thing I think we all have to be aware of. And I think we don’t need anybody. Misinforming the public. This is an issue. Of the individuals who pull those triggers. They pull those triggers. They hurt those people. That’s who’s at fault in this, and that’s who we’re going after. And we can’t let as *** community, as *** police department, as law enforcement officers, we cannot let anything sway us or distract us from that purpose. Our response on this was very timely and we bought *** lot of force to bear. But when you have these many individuals get shot, And you have this type of crime scene. You have to do everything right. Because you only get really one chance at that prosecution. And we’re gonna do everything we can and we are thankful to all of the the law enforcement partners who showed up last night, who are showing up today and who are helping us because we are utilizing like I stated, every resource. And I’m proud of my detectives and the work that they are doing. I have full confidence in their abilities. And I’m so thankful. That we can work together as *** team to go after these bad actors do not. Forget who’s responsible for the shootings. And it’s the people who pull those triggers, not just here but anywhere, but that’s who’s responsible for this. And my um Attorney General Steve Marshall and commenting about about the shooting, he, he said, uh. He said, I don’t know the exact quote, but something about he’s concerned about this what he called the stubborn refusal of officials in Montgomery to acknowledge there’s *** serious crime problem here. Do you, Mayor, do you have any response to, to what he said? I don’t know that there, um, one could look at our record uh objectively and what we’ve done with our city council, uh, and say that um there’s *** refusal to acknowledge crime is an issue, uh, in the city of Montgomery. Uh, I don’t know *** major city in the state, and I work with all the mayors in this state that would say that crime is not an issue. Uh, in this city. I think if you look at our budget, if you look at the amount of money that we have put into technology that we have put into our first responders, that we have put into recruiting and retaining the very best and brightest, uh, in law enforcement, the type of people that we bring in, casting, uh, wide net, bringing back. Uh, part-time officers, uh, really acclimated to keep great boy suggestions about addressing, uh, issues around manpower, uh, talking to our share, uh, about great ideas he has about debt programs getting people in that pipeline. Uh, working, uh, with uh community violence, uh, intervention program, funding also violence prevention with the council’s approval, working with our nonprofit, uh, leaders, faith leaders, grassroots leaders, um, I, I don’t know how one could really Uh, make that statement and, and see what we have been doing here, uh, over the last 6 years. I think it’s very easy, um, to, to sit back while you’re watching college football, um, and talk about something you don’t know about. Attorney General wants to talk to me about what we’ve been doing. I’d be more than happy to sit with him. I’ll go to him, uh, to tell him exactly what we’ve been doing. Um, but I don’t need anybody lecturing me about crime. I’ve had *** gun pointed in my face, um, and I’ll never forget. I wasn’t the mayor then, and these people last night won’t never forget what happened to them. Uh, and so, you know, I don’t, I don’t need that type of sideline, uh, commentary, uh, from the state’s top law enforcement official. I need solutions and he’s willing to offer some solutions around bail and bar reform, I’m open. We’ve been talking about that for several years. We’re gonna offer some solutions, uh, around issues around permitless caring. I’m open. We’ve been talking about that for several years. So, you know, we’ve done more than our part. Uh, we have uh engaged community partners that has helped us lower crime in this city, um, you know, over 26, 27%. Um, and we want that number to be 100%. We’re not complacent with that. Uh, we’re not stubborn to the facts that people handle disagreements very poorly, which result in why we’re here today. But to say that there’s been *** refusal, uh, it’s just ***. Lack of awareness, lack of information or education, uh, but I’d be more than happy uh to talk with him or his staff about what we’ve been doing and to talk about ways that we can collaborate, uh, not only to make Montgomery safer, but to make the state of Alabama safer. Come here. I’m sorry. We spoke about the police force’s new drones at *** press conference recently, and we saw them up in the air last night. How are they assisting specifically in this case? Drones can be utilized in so many ways, not only just for visualizing or chasing suspects if you’re in *** like *** hot pursuit, uh, they can also be utilized to map areas, and when you map areas, it helps you better locate evidence. As I stated before, we are in the process of reconstructing everything because that is what’s going to lead us to *** successful prosecution. So drones are utilized in so many different ways that we were really glad to be utilizing them last night. In fact, the ones you saw life are our allies at Aliya because they had specialized things that they could do with us. So that’s why I’m saying we are working hand in hand with all of the other law enforcement agencies. Um, so we are definitely gonna utilize every resource we have on this. So thank you for your questions.

    Gunmen kill two, injure 12 in a shootout in a crowd in Alabama capital city’s downtown

    Updated: 7:35 PM EDT Oct 5, 2025

    Editorial Standards

    Rival gunmen shot at each other in a crowded downtown nightlife district in Alabama’s capital city Saturday night, killing two people and injuring 12 others in a chaotic street scene that left authorities trying to find out who started it, police said.The dead included a 43-year-old woman, identified by police as Shalanda WIlliams, and a 17-year-old identified as Jeremiah Morris. Five of the wounded were hospitalized with life-threatening injuries, including a juvenile, Montgomery police said.No one had been arrested as of Sunday afternoon as police appealed to the public for information and sorted through a complicated crime scene that involved multiple people firing weapons in a crowd just after the Tuskegee University-Morehouse College rivalry football game ended blocks away.“We’re gonna do whatever we can not only to arrest those responsible, we’re going to do whatever to arrest those connected in any way, who knew what may have happened, who knew what could take place,” Montgomery Mayor Steven Reed told a Sunday news conference. “We’re not going just to stop with those folks that were pulling the trigger last night.”The shooters “had no regard for human life,” he said.Police were reviewing surveillance video, interviewing witnesses and potential suspects and trying to piece together a motive for why the shooting started.Police were called around 11:30 p.m. to what Montgomery Police Chief James Graboys described as a “mass shooting” that broke out near the Hank Williams Museum, the Rosa Parks Museum and the Alabama Statehouse, within earshot of officers on routine patrol in downtown Montgomery.The shooting began when someone targeted one of the 14 victims, prompting multiple people to pull their own weapons and start firing back, Graboys said.”This was two parties involved that were basically shooting at each other in the middle of a crowd,” Graboys said.The shooters, he said, “did not care about the people around them when they did it.”Seven of the 14 victims were under 20, and the youngest was 16, Graboys said. At least two of the victims were armed, Graboys said.Multiple weapons and shell cases were recovered from the scene, Graboys said.Few other details were available.It was a particularly busy weekend in Montgomery, with Alabama State University’s homecoming football game that day at Hornet Stadium, the Alabama National Fair ongoing at Garrett Coliseum and the Tuskegee University-Morehouse College game having just ended at nearby Cramton Bowl.Reed said there were police patrols within 50 feet (15 meters) when the shooting broke out. One officer was so quick to arrive on the scene that he transported a victim to the hospital before an ambulance arrived, Graboys said.

    Rival gunmen shot at each other in a crowded downtown nightlife district in Alabama’s capital city Saturday night, killing two people and injuring 12 others in a chaotic street scene that left authorities trying to find out who started it, police said.

    The dead included a 43-year-old woman, identified by police as Shalanda WIlliams, and a 17-year-old identified as Jeremiah Morris. Five of the wounded were hospitalized with life-threatening injuries, including a juvenile, Montgomery police said.

    No one had been arrested as of Sunday afternoon as police appealed to the public for information and sorted through a complicated crime scene that involved multiple people firing weapons in a crowd just after the Tuskegee University-Morehouse College rivalry football game ended blocks away.

    “We’re gonna do whatever we can not only to arrest those responsible, we’re going to do whatever to arrest those connected in any way, who knew what may have happened, who knew what could take place,” Montgomery Mayor Steven Reed told a Sunday news conference. “We’re not going just to stop with those folks that were pulling the trigger last night.”

    The shooters “had no regard for human life,” he said.

    Police were reviewing surveillance video, interviewing witnesses and potential suspects and trying to piece together a motive for why the shooting started.

    Police were called around 11:30 p.m. to what Montgomery Police Chief James Graboys described as a “mass shooting” that broke out near the Hank Williams Museum, the Rosa Parks Museum and the Alabama Statehouse, within earshot of officers on routine patrol in downtown Montgomery.

    The shooting began when someone targeted one of the 14 victims, prompting multiple people to pull their own weapons and start firing back, Graboys said.

    “This was two parties involved that were basically shooting at each other in the middle of a crowd,” Graboys said.

    The shooters, he said, “did not care about the people around them when they did it.”

    Seven of the 14 victims were under 20, and the youngest was 16, Graboys said. At least two of the victims were armed, Graboys said.

    Multiple weapons and shell cases were recovered from the scene, Graboys said.

    Few other details were available.

    It was a particularly busy weekend in Montgomery, with Alabama State University’s homecoming football game that day at Hornet Stadium, the Alabama National Fair ongoing at Garrett Coliseum and the Tuskegee University-Morehouse College game having just ended at nearby Cramton Bowl.

    Reed said there were police patrols within 50 feet (15 meters) when the shooting broke out. One officer was so quick to arrive on the scene that he transported a victim to the hospital before an ambulance arrived, Graboys said.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • L.A. Taco journalist sues LAPD in latest allegation of police mistreatment of media

    [ad_1]

    A journalist for the website L.A. Taco filed a federal civil rights lawsuit against the Los Angeles Police Department on Thursday, alleging officers have repeatedly interfered with his constitutional right to document sweeps of homeless encampments throughout the city.

    Lexis-Olivier Ray said officers and city sanitation employees have wrongfully threatened him with arrest — and in one instance actually placed him in handcuffs — as he tried to report on encampment sweeps in Skid Row and West L.A. between August and November of last year, according to the complaint.

    “I tried to resolve the issue outside of a courtroom. But instead of trying to come to an understanding, LAPD officers responded by arresting me and holding me in the back of a patrol car in handcuffs for nearly an hour, before releasing me without any charges,” Ray said in a statement. “At a time when the First Amendment is being threatened by people in power, and journalists are under attack, it’s more important than ever to reaffirm our rights to film police and government officials in public spaces without threats of arrest.”

    In some of the incidents, Ray had crossed yellow crime scene tape. But his attorney, Peter Bibring, argued the tape was put up by sanitation workers rather than police and none of the incidents were active crime scenes.

    City workers claimed Ray was interfering with their operations and in a “work zone,” but the suit contends other members of the public were able to walk through the area and he created no disruption.

    “LAPD consistently fails to get the basic point that the First Amendment forbids them from closing areas to the press unless its required for a specific and overriding concern,” Bibring said.

    Jennifer Forkish, the LAPD’s communications director, said that while she could not comment on pending litigation, the department “fully recognizes the rights of the press to cover public spaces and police activity.”

    “Our officers are trained to respect those rights while maintaining public safety,” she said.

    The city attorney’s office did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

    The lawsuit comes at a time when LAPD’s treatment of the press has come under increasing scrutiny in courtrooms.

    Last week, a judge barred police and federal law enforcement from using less-lethal weapons on journalists after a spate of incidents in which reporters were hurt during summer protests against the Trump administration’s immigration raids. The city also recently settled two lawsuits filed by journalists who claimed they were injured or wrongfully arrested during protests.

    Ray’s lawsuit claims city workers singled him out.

    During one September incident, an officer approached Ray and told him “I know exactly who you are” before demanding he leave the area, according to the complaint. In another, he was observing a clean up behind the yellow tape when a sanitation worker purposefully obstructed his view and ordered him to move back while on a public sidewalk, the suit alleges.

    Last October, an LAPD officer handcuffed Ray on suspicion of interfering with a clean-up. Video from the scene that the reporter posted to X shows the clean-up work continuing uninterrupted even as an officer tells Ray they are going to “put him in cuffs.” Ray was never formally arrested or charged with a crime.

    This is not the first time the department has faced accusations of retaliation against Ray. In 2020, he was arrested for failure to disperse while covering chaotic celebrations that followed the Dodgers World Series victory. A 2021 Times investigation showed that Ray was the only person, among the hundreds in the streets that night, that the LAPD later sought to have charged with a crime.

    Ultimately, Ray was not charged in that incident.

    [ad_2]

    James Queally

    Source link

  • New Zealand father who evaded authorities with his 3 children for years is shot dead by police

    [ad_1]

    A man who evaded authorities with his three children in the remote New Zealand countryside for nearly four years was shot and killed by a police officer Monday, law enforcement said.One child was with Tom Phillips at the time of the confrontation and the other two children were found in the forest hours after the shootout, in which an officer was critically injured.The December 2021 disappearance of Phillips and his children — now about 9, 10 and 11 years old — confounded investigators for years as they scoured the densely forested area where they believed the family was hiding. The father and children were not believed to ever have traveled far from the isolated North Island rural settlement of Marokopa where they lived, but credible sightings of them were rare.Phillips has not been formally identified, but authorities believed he was the man killed.Police officer was shot and critically injuredA police officer was shot in the head and critically injured during a confrontation with Phillips after he robbed an agricultural supplies store early Monday morning, New Zealand’s Acting Deputy Police Commissioner Jill Rogers told reporters in the city of Hamilton. The child with Phillips at the time of the robbery was taken into custody.The officer was undergoing surgery at a hospital. His injuries were survivable, Rogers said, but he was shot “multiple times with a high-powered rifle” and further surgeries were expected.Fugitive’s other two children found hours after shootoutThe whereabouts of Phillips’ other two children was unknown immediately after the shooting and authorities held serious concerns for them, Rogers said earlier.About 13 hours after their father was killed, however, Rogers told reporters that the children had been found unaccompanied at a remote campsite in rugged forest. The child taken into custody Monday had cooperated with the authorities, allowing them to narrow the search area, she said.The farm supplies store targeted Monday was in a small town in the same sprawling farming region of Waikato, south of Auckland, as the settlement of about 40 people from where the family vanished. The case has fascinated New Zealanders and the authorities made regular unsuccessful appeals for information.Sightings of Phillips were limited to surveillance footage that showed him allegedly committing crimes in the area. He was wanted for an armed bank robbery while on the run in May 2023, accompanied by one of his children, in which he reportedly shot at a member of the public.Authorities believed Phillips had helpPhillips did not have legal custody rights for his children, Detective Senior Sgt. Andrew Saunders told reporters in 2024. Authorities said they had not had access to formal education or health care since their disappearance.Law enforcement always believed that Phillips had help concealing his family and some residents of the isolated rural area expressed support for him. A reward of 80,000 New Zealand dollars ($47,000), large by New Zealand standards was offered for information about the family’s whereabouts last June, but it was never paid.Family had gone missing beforeDecember 2021 was not the first time Phillips prompted national news headlines after disappearing with his children. The family went missing that September, launching a three-week land and sea search after Phillips’ truck was found abandoned on a wild beach near where he lived.Authorities eventually ended the search, concluding the family might have died, before Phillips and the children emerged from dense forest where he said they had been camping. He was charged with wasting police resources and was due to appear in court in January 2022, but weeks before the scheduled date he and the children vanished again.The police did not immediately launch a search because Phillips, who is experienced in the outdoors, had told family he was taking the children on another trip. He never returned.The search intensified again after several sightings of Phillips in 2023 in the same region where he had vanished. He was last seen on surveillance video in August this year as he robbed a grocery store in the night, accompanied by one of his children.Children’s mother issues a statementThe children’s mother issued a statement to Radio New Zealand on Monday in which she said she was “deeply relieved” that the “ordeal” for her children had ended.“They have been dearly missed every day for nearly four years, and we are looking forward to welcoming them home with love and care,” said the woman, who has been identified in New Zealand news outlets only by her first name, Cat.

    A man who evaded authorities with his three children in the remote New Zealand countryside for nearly four years was shot and killed by a police officer Monday, law enforcement said.

    One child was with Tom Phillips at the time of the confrontation and the other two children were found in the forest hours after the shootout, in which an officer was critically injured.

    The December 2021 disappearance of Phillips and his children — now about 9, 10 and 11 years old — confounded investigators for years as they scoured the densely forested area where they believed the family was hiding. The father and children were not believed to ever have traveled far from the isolated North Island rural settlement of Marokopa where they lived, but credible sightings of them were rare.

    Phillips has not been formally identified, but authorities believed he was the man killed.

    Police officer was shot and critically injured

    A police officer was shot in the head and critically injured during a confrontation with Phillips after he robbed an agricultural supplies store early Monday morning, New Zealand’s Acting Deputy Police Commissioner Jill Rogers told reporters in the city of Hamilton. The child with Phillips at the time of the robbery was taken into custody.

    The officer was undergoing surgery at a hospital. His injuries were survivable, Rogers said, but he was shot “multiple times with a high-powered rifle” and further surgeries were expected.

    Fugitive’s other two children found hours after shootout

    The whereabouts of Phillips’ other two children was unknown immediately after the shooting and authorities held serious concerns for them, Rogers said earlier.

    About 13 hours after their father was killed, however, Rogers told reporters that the children had been found unaccompanied at a remote campsite in rugged forest. The child taken into custody Monday had cooperated with the authorities, allowing them to narrow the search area, she said.

    The farm supplies store targeted Monday was in a small town in the same sprawling farming region of Waikato, south of Auckland, as the settlement of about 40 people from where the family vanished. The case has fascinated New Zealanders and the authorities made regular unsuccessful appeals for information.

    Sightings of Phillips were limited to surveillance footage that showed him allegedly committing crimes in the area. He was wanted for an armed bank robbery while on the run in May 2023, accompanied by one of his children, in which he reportedly shot at a member of the public.

    Authorities believed Phillips had help

    Phillips did not have legal custody rights for his children, Detective Senior Sgt. Andrew Saunders told reporters in 2024. Authorities said they had not had access to formal education or health care since their disappearance.

    Law enforcement always believed that Phillips had help concealing his family and some residents of the isolated rural area expressed support for him. A reward of 80,000 New Zealand dollars ($47,000), large by New Zealand standards was offered for information about the family’s whereabouts last June, but it was never paid.

    Family had gone missing before

    December 2021 was not the first time Phillips prompted national news headlines after disappearing with his children. The family went missing that September, launching a three-week land and sea search after Phillips’ truck was found abandoned on a wild beach near where he lived.

    Authorities eventually ended the search, concluding the family might have died, before Phillips and the children emerged from dense forest where he said they had been camping. He was charged with wasting police resources and was due to appear in court in January 2022, but weeks before the scheduled date he and the children vanished again.

    The police did not immediately launch a search because Phillips, who is experienced in the outdoors, had told family he was taking the children on another trip. He never returned.

    The search intensified again after several sightings of Phillips in 2023 in the same region where he had vanished. He was last seen on surveillance video in August this year as he robbed a grocery store in the night, accompanied by one of his children.

    Children’s mother issues a statement

    The children’s mother issued a statement to Radio New Zealand on Monday in which she said she was “deeply relieved” that the “ordeal” for her children had ended.

    “They have been dearly missed every day for nearly four years, and we are looking forward to welcoming them home with love and care,” said the woman, who has been identified in New Zealand news outlets only by her first name, Cat.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • ‘Constructive’? Look again at the smoke and mirrors of the Trump-Putin summit

    [ad_1]

    We’ve read quite a bit about President Trump’s “hot mic” comment, during a meeting with European leaders about the Russian war against Ukraine, that Vladimir Putin “wants to make a deal for me, as crazy as it sounds.”

    Pundits debated whether this was an embarrassment for Trump; they wondered why he would say such an important thing in a whisper to French President Emmanuel Macron — as if Trump’s verbal goulash were something new. Headlines were full of the word “deal” for a while, including three days later, when they were reporting that Trump said Putin might not want “to make a deal.” And, of course, there is no deal.

    The press coverage of the meeting in Alaska said there were lots of “constructive” conversations. Putin spoke about “neighborly” talks and the “constructive atmosphere of mutual respect” in his conversations with Trump. There were reports about agreements “in principle” on various things under discussion, although there were no details about what they might be.

    I covered more than a few superpower summits, first as a reporter for the Associated Press and later for the New York Times. Although that was more than 30 years ago, the smoke and mirrors nonsense usually produced by meetings like these has not changed. Verbal gas is abundant and facts almost nonexistent. Trump’s comments were worth about as much as anything else he has said on the subject, which is almost nothing. And yet, they were reported and parsed endlessly as if they had the same meaning as other presidents’ words had in the past.

    I had a powerful sense of deja vu from a five-day trip to Afghanistan in January 1987. The Kremlin had finally agreed to let a group of Western journalists visit Kabul and Jalalabad to witness the “cease-fire” that had been announced a few days before we arrived. The visit was billed as an Afghan government tour, which nobody — especially the Afghan government — believed.

    We saw no fighting, although we could see artillery fire in the hills at night. Some of the “specials,” as we wire service correspondents called the major media then, reported that we were fired on. We were not.

    Mostly, we shopped for rugs and drank cold Heinekens, which were unavailable in Moscow but mysteriously well stocked at the Intercontinental Hotel in Kabul. We were ushered to various peace and unity events between the Afghan and Russian peoples and toured the huge Soviet military camps just outside Kabul with a U.S. official (allegedly a diplomat from the Embassy, but we knew from experience that this person was from the Central Intelligence Agency).

    On Jan. 19, we were taken (each reporter in an individual government car with a minder) to a news conference by Mohammad Najib, the Afghan leader whose name had been Najibullah until he changed it to make it sound less religious for his Bolshevik friends. Najib said that Afghanistan and the Soviet Union had agreed “in principle” on a “timetable for withdrawal” of Soviet occupation forces.

    At that point, the Reuters correspondent, who was fairly new to Moscow still, bolted from the room and raced back to our hotel, where there was one Telex machine for us all to send our stories back to Moscow. He filed a bulletin on the announcement. When the rest of us made our leisurely return, we were greeted with messages from our home offices demanding to know about the big deal to end the war in Afghanistan.

    We wrote our stories, which were about a business-as-usual press conference that yielded no real news. We each appended a message to explain why the Reuters report was just plain wrong. Talk of Soviet withdrawal was common, and always wrong. The very idea that the puppet government in Kabul had something to say about it or was a party to any serious discussions about ending the war was absurd. The most pithy comment came from the Agence France-Presse reporter, who told her editors that the Reuters story was “merde.” The Soviet military did not withdraw until February 1989, more than two years later, following its own schedule.

    Much of the recent coverage about Russia and Ukraine reminds me of that Afghan news flash in 1987. The Kremlin has never been, was not then and is not now interested in negotiation or compromise. Under Soviet communism and under Putin, diplomacy is a zero-sum game whose only goal is to restore Russian hegemony over Eastern Europe. And yet, for some reason, the American media and the country’s diplomats seem as oblivious today as they always were. After the summit, they announced breathlessly that there was no peace deal out of the summit, although they all knew going in that there was no deal on the table and there never was going to be one.

    But of course Putin wants a “deal” on Ukraine. It’s the same deal he has wanted since he violated international law (not for the first time) and invaded Ukraine on Feb. 24, 2022. He wants to redraw the boundaries of Ukraine to give him even more territory than he has already seized, and he wants to be sure Ukraine remains out of NATO and under Moscow’s military thumb as he has done with other former Soviet regions, like Georgia, which he invaded in 2008 as soon as the country dared to suggest it might be interested in NATO membership. His latest nonsense was to demand that Russia be part of any postwar security arrangements. He wants the NATO allies to stop treating him like the war criminal that he is and to be seen as an equal actor on the international stage with NATO and especially the United States.

    That he got, in abundance, from Trump in Alaska, starting with the location. Trump invited Putin to the United States during a period of travel bans to and from Russia, immediately giving the Russian dictator a huge PR win. It also, conveniently, put him in the only NATO country where he is not wanted on charges of crimes against humanity.

    As for peace talks, check the headlines from Ukraine before, during and after the Alaska summit: The Russians have stepped up their killing and destruction in Ukraine with new ferocity and have been grabbing as much land in eastern Ukraine as they can. Every square inch of that land — and more the Kremlin has not yet occupied — will be part of any “deal” that Putin will accept. Trump himself has been talking about “land swaps” (as he has from the start of the war, by the way) — a nonsensical idea when you consider the land Ukraine holds is its sovereign territory and the land Russian holds was stolen.

    The brilliant M. Gessen, perhaps the leading authority on dictatorship, published an essay in the New York Review, “Autocracy: Rules for Survival,” shortly after the 2016 election. “Rule #2: Do not be taken in by small signs of normality,” they wrote.

    A U.S. president and a Russian leader sitting down to talk and emerging with bluster about progress seems normal enough, perhaps encouraging when American-Russian relations have been at a historic low. Just remember that coming from these two men, the comments signify nothing — or, worse, make us wonder what Trump has given away to Putin with his talk of land swaps.

    Andrew Rosenthal, a former reporter, editor and columnist, was Moscow bureau chief for the Associated Press and Washington editor and later editorial page editor for the New York Times.

    [ad_2]

    Andrew Rosenthal

    Source link

  • Trump says Putin wants a deal as Kremlin says Ukraine war aims remain ‘unchanged’

    [ad_1]

    Vladimir Putin is lavishing praise on President Trump ahead of their high-stakes summit in Alaska on Friday, thanking his host for “energetic and sincere efforts to stop the fighting” in Ukraine over three years since the Russian leader attempted to conquer the country.

    Trump, at the White House, also expressed optimism ahead of the talks, telling reporters he believes Putin “would like to see a deal” after suffering more than a million Russian casualties on the battlefield.

    Yet Russian Foreign Ministry officials said Wednesday that Putin’s war aims remain “unchanged.” And an aggressive Russian advance along the front lines this week provided evidence to military analysts that Moscow has no plans to implement a ceasefire.

    It was a day of diplomatic maneuvering ahead of an extraordinary visit from a Russian president to the U.S. homeland, and the first audience Putin has received with a Western leader since the war began.

    “It’s going to be very interesting — we’re going to find out where everybody stands,” Trump told reporters in the Oval Office on Thursday. “If it’s a bad meeting, it’ll end very quickly. And if it’s a good meeting, we’re going to end up getting peace in the very near future.”

    Putin’s positioning ahead of the summit, and Trump’s eagerness for a deal, continue to fuel worries across Europe and in Ukraine that the Alaska negotiations could result in a bilateral agreement designed by Moscow and endorsed by Washington that sidelines Kyiv.

    In London, Britain’s prime minister, Keir Starmer, hosted Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky on Thursday, offering support for Trump’s effort while placing the onus on Putin to “prove he is serious about peace.”

    “They agreed there had been a powerful sense of unity and a strong resolve to achieve a just and lasting peace in Ukraine,” 10 Downing Street said in a statement.

    Trump said the Alaska summit, to be held at Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson in Anchorage, is meant to “set the table” for direct talks between Putin and Zelensky that could include himself and European leaders.

    Journalists stand outside Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson in Anchorage on Thursday ahead of Friday’s summit between President Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin.

    (Jae C. Hong / Associated Press)

    But addressing reporters, Trump suggested that denying Putin dominion over all of Ukraine — and allowing him to hold on to the territories he has seized militarily — would be concession enough from Moscow. The president had said in recent days that land “swapping” would be part of an ultimate peace settlement, a statement rejected by Kyiv.

    “I think President Putin would like to see a deal,” Trump said. “I think if I weren’t president, he would take over all of Ukraine.”

    “I am president, and he’s not going to mess around with me,” he added.

    Russian state media reported Thursday that Putin had gathered his advisors to inform them of “how the negotiation process on the Ukrainian crisis is going.”

    Trump, “in my opinion, quite energetic and sincere efforts to stop the fighting, stop the crisis and reach agreements that are of interest to all parties involved in this conflict,” Putin said.

    But U.S. efforts to get Russia to halt the fighting have proved futile for months, with Moscow pressing forward in an offensive that has secured incremental gains on the battlefield.

    “Putin thinks that he is winning this war militarily,” said Frederick Kagan, director of the Critical Threats Project, which collaborates with the Institute for the Study of War to produce daily battlefield assessments on the conflict. “He’s also confident that Western support for Ukraine, and particularly U.S. support, will break, and that when it does, Ukraine will collapse, and he’ll be able to take control of the whole thing.”

    “It’s been his theory of victory for a long time,” Kagan said, “and it’s a huge part of the problem, because he’s not going to make any concessions so long as he’s confident that he’s winning.”

    Russian incursions along a strategic portion of the front line, near a crucial Ukrainian logistics hub, spooked Ukraine’s supporters earlier this week. While serious, Kagan said that Russia does not hold the territory, and said that the conditions for offensive Russian operations had been set over the course of months.

    “The Russians continue to have the initiative, and they continue to make gains,” he added. “The first step in changing Putin’s calculation about the war is to urgently help the Ukrainians stop the gains.”

    Zelensky, after meeting with Starmer in London, said that he and the British leader had “discussed expectations for the meeting in Alaska and possible prospects.”

    “We also discussed in considerable detail the security guarantees that can make peace truly durable,” Zelensky said, “if the United States succeeds in pressing Russia to stop the killings and engage in genuine, substantive diplomacy.”

    Trump and Putin plan on arriving of the U.S. airbase within moments of one another, and are expected to meet on the tarmac before retreating into a private meeting.

    Afterward, Trump and Putin will take questions from the press, the White House said.

    [ad_2]

    Michael Wilner

    Source link

  • In Coachella, Trump returns to a favorite theme: Bashing California

    In Coachella, Trump returns to a favorite theme: Bashing California

    [ad_1]

    With just 23 days left until election day and voters already casting ballots, former President Trump rallied supporters in the California desert while railing against the state’s Democratic leadership, notably his presidential rival, Vice President Kamala Harris.

    Trump blasted California as having “the highest inflation, the highest taxes, the highest gas prices, the highest cost of living, the most regulations, the most expensive utilities, the most homelessness, the most crime, the most decay and the most illegal aliens.”

    “Other than that, you’re doing quite well, actually,” Trump said. “We’re not going to let Kamala Harris do to America what she did to California.”

    Trump painted California as a lawless, dystopian state, and at times correctly touched on the economic struggles faced by many residents. But his comments also were peppered with distortions and falsehoods, including his claim that California has brownouts and blackouts “every day,” presumably because of power shortages.

    The former president spoke shortly after 5 p.m. on a polo field at Calhoun Ranch, just outside the city of Coachella, but supporters lined up hours earlier in the scorching desert heat to attend.

    Trump stands before supporters at the rally at Calhoun Ranch.

    (Wally Skalij / Los Angeles Times)

    As they spent hours in temperatures that reached 100 degrees, they sought shade in the few spots they could, and large tanks of ice quickly emptied as attendees grabbed fistfuls of cubes to put under their hats or fill water bottles. Multiple medical emergencies occurred during the rally.

    “Welcome to Trumpchella!” said state GOP Chairwoman Jessica Millan Patterson, one of the warm-up speakers for Trump.

    Trump’s visit to the home state of Harris offers him another chance to bash the liberal policies of the Bay Area native as well as California itself — one of his favorite refrains on the campaign trail. Harris served as San Francisco’s district attorney before she was elected as California’s attorney general and to the U.S. Senate.

    And the Coachella Valley, home to a thriving agricultural industry and a large population of Latino farmworkers, provides a backdrop for Trump to highlight the region’s water and agricultural needs, as well as immigration. Latinos constitute almost 98% of Coachella, according to U.S. Census Bureau data.

    Deriding California as a “sanctuary state” for immigrants as he spoke to thousands of supporters, Trump said, “The people of California are not going to take it any longer.”

    He repeatedly tied immigrants — many of whom, he said, come from “dungeons of the Third World” — to criminal activity, though studies show that immigrants commit crimes at lower levels than U.S.-born residents. He blasted Harris, whom President Biden tasked with addressing the root causes of immigration from three nations in Central America, as a failed “border czar.”

    “Kamala Harris got you into this mess and only Trump will get you out of it,” he said.

    Trump criticized California as being horribly mismanaged, primarily blaming Harris and Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom, especially when it comes to crime, the high cost of living and water policy. The former president also threatened to cut off federal disaster aid for the state’s devastating wildfires if California’s leaders don’t make more water available to farmers and homeowners.

    “We’re going to take care of your water situation, force it down his throat, and we’ll say: Gavin, if you don’t do it, we’re not giving any of that fire money that we send you all the time for all the fire, forest fires that you have,” Trump said.

    Donning his red “Make America Great Again” hat to guard against the beating desert sun, Trump encouraged the crowd to vote in large numbers, to make the election “too big to rig.” He has repeatedly denied losing the 2020 election. “They are good at one thing. Which one thing?” he asked the crowd. “Cheating!” the crowd roared back.

    Trump also turned his ire against Rep. Adam B. Schiff (D-Burbank), the front-runner in California’s U.S. Senate race who led a successful House impeachment of Trump, before the Senate acquitted him. Trump called him “one of the least attractive human beings” and insulted the size of Schiff’s neck and head.

    Rep. Raul Ruiz (D-Indio) said that the “Coachella Valley is known for being a presidential playground,” noting that Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) campaigned in the valley, former President Obama came to golf, and Presidents Ford and Eisenhower retired in the region. Still, he called Trump’s decision to visit Coachella — in one of the bluest states in the country — “baffling.”

    Donald Trump speaks at an outdoor venue

    Trump addresses the crowd Saturday.

    (Wally Skalij / Los Angeles Times)

    “We are familiar with having presidents come and leave a mark here, and we respect and love them. … But ex-President Trump is different,” Ruiz said on a call from Coachella Valley, where he was spending the day talking to reporters. “There doesn’t seem to be a lot of respect for the demographics that live here — not just in his vile rhetoric but also in his policies.”

    The rally venue is just outside the 41st Congressional District, where Democrat Will Rollins, a former federal prosecutor, is challenging Republican Rep. Ken Calvert, who spoke at the rally. The race will be crucial in determining which party wins control of the House.

    Calvert, who was endorsed by Trump in the 2022 congressional election and on Saturday for his current campaign, voted against certifying the 2020 election results in Arizona and Pennsylvania though he acknowledged that Democrat Joe Biden won the presidency.

    “Welcome Trump,” Calvert told the rally crowd. “Show him some sanity still exists in California, and it’s right here in Riverside County.”

    Other speakers included Republican Rep. Matt Gaetz of Florida, an ardent Trump ally, and Dennis Quaid, the actor who recently portrayed President Reagan in his namesake movie.

    Mary and Pete Venegas drove more than an hour from their Hemet home to see Trump, for whom they both plan to vote for the first time in November.

    Mary Venegas, a former Democrat who sat out the 2020 election because she was unenthusiastic about Biden, said Trump deserves “a second chance.” Wearing a red Trump T-shirt, she said she is now a registered Republican.

    “He made me do it,” she said, laughing, as she poked her husband, who runs a construction and landscaping business and said he supports Trump because of his business acumen.

    The visit marks Trump’s second trip to the Golden State in a month, after making a stop to talk to reporters at his Rancho Palos Verdes golf course in September sandwiched between two high-dollar fundraisers in Beverly Hills and the Bay Area.

    California GOP strategists granted anonymity to discuss the former president’s motivation said it included the notion that he wanted to increase his share of the popular vote — and despite California’s Democratic tilt, it is home to more than 5 million registered Republicans.

    Trump has announced that he will hold an Oct. 27 rally at Madison Square Garden in New York, another deeply Democratic state.

    At Saturday’s rally, mentions of Harris and Newsom from Riverside County Sheriff Chad Bianco, who was a delegate at the Republican National Committee, drew boos from the audience.

    “The downfall of public safety in California began over a decade ago with Gavin Newsom’s policies, and ideas under the watch of Atty. Gen. Kamala Harris,” Bianco said, mentioning Proposition 47, a state ballot initiative that reduced certain thefts and crimes to misdemeanors.

    Though Proposition 47 was put in place under Harris’ watch, she declined to wade into the political debate as attorney general. California voters will decide whether to roll back some of the 2014 measure when voting on Proposition 36 next month.

    Trump held a rally in Aurora, Colo., on Friday — a state he lost by more than 13 points in 2020. He has falsely claimed that Aurora had been taken over by Venezuelan gang members. He also paid a visit Friday night to Nevada.

    People cheer Donald Trump during an outdoor rally

    Trump acknowledges supporters’ cheers.

    (Wally Skalij / Los Angeles Times)

    During Saturday’s rally, Trump mentioned a new immigration policy, dubbed “Operation Aurora,” that he announced during Friday’s visit to expedite deportation of immigrant gang members. He also called for the death penalty for any immigrant who kills an American citizen or law enforcement officer, a proposal that drew chants of “USA!” from the audience.

    On Thursday, while speaking at the Detroit Economic Club, he insulted the city and warned that the situation in Detroit foreshadowed what would happen to the nation if Harris is elected president.

    “Our whole country will end up being like Detroit if she’s elected president,” Trump said. “We’re not going to let her do that to this country. We’re not gonna let it happen.”

    Democrats in Michigan — one of the states likely to determine which party wins the White House — were apoplectic.

    “Detroit is the epitome of ‘grit,’ defined by winners willing to get their hands dirty to build up their city and create their communities — something Donald Trump could never understand,” Gov. Gretchen Whitmer wrote on X, the social media site formerly known as Twitter. “So keep Detroit out of your mouth. And you better believe Detroiters won’t forget this in November.”

    Republicans from the state were stunned by Trump’s remarks as well.

    “Michiganders haven’t been this proud of the city of Detroit since Henry Ford put the world on wheels. The Lions and Tigers are flying high, the city has come back to life, and in comes Donald Trump to crap all over that progress,” said an exasperated GOP strategist who reached out to a Times reporter after hearing the remarks, and was granted anonymity to speak candidly. “I think he shouldn’t be surprised when they reward his comments by giving Kamala Harris their votes. And it won’t just be Detroit residents. It will be hundreds of thousands of voters who are deeply proud of their city.”

    Donald Trump walking off a stage at night.

    Trump exits the stage after the rally.

    (Wally Skalij / Los Angeles Times)

    Harris said Trump’s remarks about Detroit represent a trend.

    “My opponent, Donald Trump, yet again, has trashed another great American city when he was in Detroit, which is just a further piece of evidence on a very long list of why he is unfit to be president of the United States,” Harris told reporters Thursday in Las Vegas.

    Trump similarly criticized Milwaukee in a meeting with House Republicans shortly before the Republican National Convention was held there, in the battleground state of Wisconsin, earlier this year. He has also disparaged Philadelphia and Atlanta, both of which are in states that will determine which party wins the White House.

    [ad_2]

    Faith E. Pinho, Seema Mehta

    Source link

  • We’re hiring! Join Phoenix New Times as news editor or news reporter

    We’re hiring! Join Phoenix New Times as news editor or news reporter

    [ad_1]

    Phoenix New Times is looking to hire a news editor and news reporter to add to our scrappy editorial team.

    We want to add a versatile news reporter to tell important, timely and engaging stories about the Valley and a news editor to lead our team of reporters and freelancers. Think you’ve got the journalism chops for either job? The full details on what we’re looking for are below.

    Come join an editorial team that’s been telling the stories of a diverse and booming region since 1970.

    New Times news editor: About the job

    We’re looking for a versatile news editor with excellent news sense and strong editing chops. You’ll lead our team of two reporters and freelancers to tell important, hard-hitting, timely and engaging stories.

    Key responsibilities

    • Manage two full-time news reporters, along with freelance reporters and photographers, to produce a range of stories. Our stories include breaking news and trending topics that need to be written quickly to enterprise, investigative or feature stories that could take a week or more to report. You’ll also oversee the creation of guides and explainers about local and regional events and issues.
    • Efficiently edit stories for structure, line editing and copy editing so they read beautifully, clearly and concisely and are free of factual and grammatical errors and typos. Ensure that care has been given to the best possible use of headlines, photography and art. Make sure that stories adhere to our style, SEO best practices and social media strategies.
    • Collaborate with the editor-in-chief on planning news coverage and the daily story budget.
    • Manage the editorial workflow for the news vertical, assigning stories to reporters and freelancers, monitoring deadlines. ensuring a regular cadence of story output and balance, and meeting goals for volume and traffic.
    • Write news stories as needed.
    • Meet with reporters on a weekly basis. Maintain regular contact with freelancers and recruit new ones.
    • Coach reporters and freelancers through any part of the pitching, reporting, writing, editing or production process. Deliver feedback to them on their work.
    • Collaborate with other parts of the newsroom, our social media and product teams, and occasionally with editors in our newsrooms in Denver, Dallas and Miami.
    • Build broad and diverse relationships so that sources, story ideas, research and reporting reflect the diverse communities of the Valley.
    • Participate in our annual Best of Phoenix issue and other projects during the year.

    Who you are

    • A journalist with 5 plus years in a newsroom with at least 3 years of full-time experience managing journalists and editing breaking, daily and enterprise stories.
    • A working knowledge of — or eagerness to immerse yourself in — the character, people, politics and culture of Phoenix and the Valley.
    • A curious person interested in learning about and staying current on topics related to our coverage areas, including politics, public health, criminal justice, cannabis, government, labor and the environment.
    • A journalist with a track record of crafting breaking stories on deadline with crisp writing and the ability to tell stories about people impacted by what you’re covering.
    • Strong interpersonal and communication skills, both written and verbal.
    • A highly-organized, resourceful and proactive self-starter committed to accuracy and meeting deadlines.
    • Experience with open records requests.
    • Fluency in Spanish is a plus, as is experience in a marginalized community.

    Benefits

    • Compensation range of $65,000 to $75,000.
    • 401(k) with company match.
    • Medical, dental, vision and life insurance.
    • 10 paid holidays, 14 days of paid time off, 5 paid sick days per year.
    • Hybrid work policy based in our central Phoenix office.

    New Times news reporter: About the job

    We’re looking to hire a full-time news reporter that can craft stories ranging from breaking news and trending topics that need to be written quickly to enterprise, investigative or feature stories that could take a week or more to report. You’ll also produce helpful guides to local and regional events and issues.

    We value ambitious reporting, well-crafted prose, an engaging voice and savvy use of social media.

    Key responsibilities

    • Your stories will range from breaking news and trending topics that need to be written quickly to enterprise, investigative or feature stories that could take a week or more to report. You’ll also produce helpful guides to local and regional events and issues.
    • Work with the newsroom to tell these stories in a variety of formats, including traditional articles online and in our weekly print issue, videos, photo essays and through social media.
    • Use social media to find trending topics to cover, discover sources and promote your work.
    • Attend public meetings, town halls, political rallies and other events outside the office to find sources, stories and people impacted by the decisions made by elected officials and government agencies. The position sometimes requires evening and weekend work.
    • Collaborate with other parts of the newsroom, our social media and product teams, and occasionally with reporters and editors in our newsrooms in Denver, Dallas and Miami.
    • Build broad and diverse relationships so that sources, story ideas, research and reporting reflect the diverse communities of the Valley.
    • Be committed to accuracy and meeting deadlines.
    • Participate in our annual Best of Phoenix issue and other projects during the year.

    Who you are

    • A journalist with a track record of crafting breaking stories on deadline with crisp writing and the ability to tell stories about people impacted by what you’re covering.
    • Demonstrable writing skills with the ability to report complex issues with simplified, accessible language.
    • Experience in reporting across a variety of topics, such as politics, public health, criminal justice, cannabis, government, labor and the environment.
    • Strong interpersonal and communication skills, both written and verbal.
    • A highly-organized, resourceful and proactive self-starter.
    • Experience with open records requests.
    • Fluency in Spanish is a plus, as is experience in a marginalized community.

    Benefits

    • Compensation range of $42,000 to $50,000, depending on experience.
    • 401(k) with company match.
    • Medical, dental, vision and life insurance.
    • 10 paid holidays, 14 days of paid time off, 5 paid sick days per year.
    • Hybrid work policy based in our central Phoenix office.
    • This is a union position.

    How to apply for either position

    We’re committed to building an inclusive newsroom that reflects the people and communities we serve across the Valley. We encourage members of underrepresented communities to apply, including women, people of color, LGBTQ+ people, and people with disabilities.

    News editor

    Email a cover letter, resume and links for up to three stories you reported or edited, along with a few sentences explaining the backstory of each piece and your role, to [email protected]. Please put News Editor in the subject line.

    News reporter

    Email a cover letter, resume and links to three to five clips that show your skills and range to [email protected]. Please put News Reporter in the subject line.



    [ad_2]

    Matt Hennie

    Source link

  • Court orders reporter to hand over jailhouse interview notes — a threat to free press, critics say

    Court orders reporter to hand over jailhouse interview notes — a threat to free press, critics say

    [ad_1]

    Ishani Desai was just doing her job. As a reporter on a murder case, she needed information she felt she could get from only one person: the man who was behind bars.

    “I went to the source,” said Desai, a former reporter for the Bakersfield Californian.

    She couldn’t have known at the time that the notes from her jailhouse interview would spur a court order that, legal experts say, could threaten freedom of the press in California.

    The suspect, Sebastian Parra, was in custody on suspicion of his alleged role in the Aug. 24, 2022, death of 43-year-old Benny Alcala Jr., a counselor for the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation.

    Alcala was fatally shot at an electric vehicle charging station outside a Target store in Bakersfield. Witnesses reported seeing two men flee the area of the shooting. One was identified as Robert Pernell Roberts, who was arrested on suspicion of murder, and the second was Parra, who denied involvement in the shooting and, initially, was not arrested.

    Parra testified at Roberts’ preliminary hearing, as did law enforcement. Roberts’ attorney, Lexi Blythe of the Kern County Public Defender’s Office, pointed out inconsistencies between Parra’s testimony and that of law enforcement.

    Parra was subsequently indicted by a grand jury. Like Roberts, he has pleaded not guilty to murder.

    Blythe then filed a subpoena for Parra’s February jailhouse interview with Desai — which consisted solely of Desai’s handwritten notes — saying it was necessary for her defense of Roberts.

    The Californian challenged Blythe’s subpoena, citing the 1st Amendment as well as California’s shield law, a section of the state constitution that protects news organizations from being held in contempt of court for withholding sources and unpublished information, including interview notes.

    The Kern County Superior Court ruled the newspaper was in contempt of court and ordered the notes be turned over, as they were “reasonably necessary” for Roberts’ defense and his constitutional right to a fair trial.

    The Californian appealed the decision to the California 5th Circuit Court of Appeal, which upheld the lower court’s decision but reversed the contempt-of-court ruling.

    As a result, the Californian handed over the unpublished notes to the Kern County Public Defender’s Office on Nov. 15. The news outlet also published the notes online.

    Desai, now a reporter at the Sacramento Bee, said in an emailed statement to The Times that she had decided to interview Parra to answer a question she faced while covering the murder case.

    “No one would tell me why the man who was once the prosecution’s star witness now faced an egregious murder charge,” Desai, 25, said. “So, I went to the source.”

    Desai said, however, that there was nothing significant that she wrote down that day at the jail that wasn’t also included in her Feb. 26 story in the Californian.

    The Californian’s own story on the appellate decision states the newspaper will not pursue an appeal at the California Supreme Court because the case would be unlikely to be reviewed and because of the outsize expense. The news outlet cited legal expenditures “exceeding $100,000” in the case so far.

    The paper, however, does seek to make the ruling unpublished, a legal process that would make the opinion unusable in future cases. Though the opinion remains public record, unpublishing it would render the case unusable as a citation and limit the precedent it sets in similar cases for California news organizations.

    Even if the decision is unpublished, the ruling is viewed as a worrying setback by advocates of press freedom, who fear it could affect the ability of journalists to do their job in the Golden State.

    David Loy, the legal director of the First Amendment Coalition, worries this decision could be chilling for journalists reporting on criminal cases.

    “It, in effect, makes the bar lower than it should be to pierce the reporter’s shield,” said Loy, whose organization filed an amicus brief in the case. He called the appellate court decision disappointing.

    Although California’s shield law remains strong, he said the ruling makes it easier for attorneys to use the only exception under which journalists must turn over unpublished material: when a criminal defendant seeks such information. In such cases, the California Supreme Court has established a balancing test to weigh the rights of a reporter against those of the defendant.

    Loy said this test has for decades found that only in an “extraordinarily compelling situation” would a journalist have to turn over their notes, something he didn’t see in this case.

    “The function of the court is to balance the interests,” Loy said. “It seems like that balance has been somewhat skewed by this opinion.”

    Loy said he’s worried the ruling could make reporters and editors hesitate when considering whether to interview someone in jail or a witness to a crime — interviews that he called a cornerstone of good journalism.

    “If that cost and risk is too high, that’s going to be a deterrent to report that story in that way,” Loy said, noting the potential legal fees. “It’s going to make reporters, and, I assume, editors and publishers, risk-averse.”

    Another organization that filed an amicus brief in the case was the Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press. Lisa Zycherman, the organization’s deputy legal director and policy counsel, said the chilling effect of the ruling would affect not just journalists but also potential sources.

    “Forcing a journalist to betray a promise of confidentiality could make sources think twice, or they might just not come forward,” Zycherman said. “That chills the free flow of information to the public, and it compromises the ability of journalists to do their jobs.”

    Christine Peterson, the Californian’s executive editor, said that since the legal battle over the notes began, she had already had a colleague walk away from an interview with an incarcerated source.

    “He decided that, for the kind of story it was, that it wasn’t critical,” Peterson said. “That’s not to say we won’t continue to interview criminal defendants who agree to it and are in custody, but I think it’s fair to say this gave him pause.”

    Desai, however, said her determination had only grown after the ruling.

    “Many reporters — including myself — wonder if our work and sources are safe,” she wrote in her statement to The Times. “But the alternative is to shirk my duty, letting our community go uninformed and unaware of the powerful criminal justice system. That option is untenable for me and I refuse to back down when encountering threats to my work’s sanctity.”

    [ad_2]

    Jeremy Childs, Grace Toohey

    Source link

  • Gavin Newsom is mesmerized by the growth of driverless cars. Other California Democrats, not so much

    Gavin Newsom is mesmerized by the growth of driverless cars. Other California Democrats, not so much

    [ad_1]

    California Gov. Gavin Newsom walked out of the Tesla gigafactory in China last month feeling jazzed about the future.

    A future where people do a lot less driving, instead being whisked around by autonomous cars and flying taxis. A future where, he said, the “entire transportation system is completely reorganized.”

    “I think it’s going to come very fast,” Newsom said to reporters on the last day of his trip to China promoting clean energy partnerships with California.

    “With AI in particular aiding this advancement, I think it’s just going to explode and you’re going to start seeing driverless flying cars as well.”

    Newsom made it clear that he’s committed to keeping California the global leader in the development of autonomous technology and said the state shouldn’t “cede the future” to other countries or states.

    A tech-friendly, entrepreneurial streak has been one of Newsom’s hallmarks since he entered politics. As lieutenant governor in 2011, he famously set up his San Francisco office in a private hub of tech start-ups. Newsom boasts of having bought one of the first Teslas ever sold, and has had a longstanding relationship with Elon Musk, whom he calls “one of the world’s great innovators.”

    But the governor’s effusive comments about autonomous vehicles come as the technology is causing outrage in some California cities, putting Newsom in conflict with many fellow Democrats who are calling for more oversight of the robotic cars on public roads. He’s clashing with mayors and other local officials who want more control over the expansion of robotaxis in their cities, as well as with state lawmakers who believe California’s system for regulating autonomous vehicles is insufficient.

    Martha Hubert writes a message opposing robotaxi expansion on Aug. 10 in San Francisco.

    (Godofredo A. Vásquez / Associated Press)

    The friction is growing as autonomous vehicle companies ramp up their lobbying in Sacramento. Cruise, Waymo, Motional and the Autonomous Vehicle Industry Assn. collectively spent about $2.4 million on lobbying the state government in the first nine months of this year — more than three times the $671,579 they spent lobbying in all of last year, according to disclosures filed with the Secretary of State. Much of that increase is due to a huge jump in spending by Waymo, the business owned by Google’s parent company that operates robotaxis in San Francisco and Santa Monica, with plans to expand to other parts of L.A. this month.

    Skepticism from local officials has intensified since a Cruise robotaxi dragged a person down a San Francisco street last month, and the company allegedly failed to disclose footage of the wreck. The DMV suspended Cruise’s permits and the General Motors-owned company announced it is suspending U.S. operations while it works to “rebuild public trust.” It recalled its autonomous fleet to perform a software update.

    On Nov. 1, Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass wrote a fiery letter to state regulators saying the city wants more say in regulating driverless taxis and she criticized the state for a lack of attention to “public safety, road safety, and other serious concerns.”

    “To date, local jurisdictions like Los Angeles have had little to no input in AV deployment and are already seeing significant harm and disruption,” Bass wrote to the state Public Utilities Commission, which approved a massive expansion of robotaxis in August.

    Newsom appoints the members of the Public Utilities Commission and oversees the Department of Motor Vehicles, the two agencies tasked with regulating autonomous vehicles. He told reporters he agreed with the DMV’s decision to ban Cruise from San Francisco streets following the crash that left a pedestrian seriously injured.

    Even before the Cruise debacle, city officials in San Francisco criticized the state’s move to grow the presence of autonomous vehicles. The fire chief complained that robotaxis are a danger to emergency response because they stop in traffic, pull up too close to firetrucks that are unloading equipment and block firehouse driveways. The police officers union also raised concerns about their expansion. After the Public Utilities Commission approved the expansion, San Francisco’s city attorney filed motions asking it to reverse course, which the commission declined to do.

    Now a state lawmaker is pressing the DMV for more information on how it permits autonomous vehicles, how it addresses safety concerns and why it suspended Cruise’s permit. The formal inquiry by state Sen. Dave Cortese (D-San Jose) could portend hearings or legislation on autonomous vehicles after the Legislature reconvenes in January.

    “All of us in public service would like to intervene and prevent things from happening and not have tragedy dictate an acceleration of remedies. But if we don’t hurry that’s what’s going to happen,” Cortese said in an interview.

    He said California’s structure of having two agencies tasked with regulating driverless cars is problematic.

    “I believe we need a single executive agency that deals with autonomous vehicles much like the FAA deals with air travel, commercial and private,” Cortese said. “We don’t have the infrastructure set up to monitor what’s going on or hold people accountable.”

    Newsom defended the state’s oversight during his conversation with reporters outside the Shanghai Tesla plant.

    “The DMV has built a whole new shop in terms of organizing around making sure people are safe,” he said. “But autonomy is the future.”

    An electric Jaguar I-Pace car outfitted with Waymo full self-driving technology drives through Santa Monica on Feb. 21.

    An electric Jaguar I-Pace car outfitted with Waymo full self-driving technology drives through Santa Monica on Feb. 21.

    (Allen J. Schaben/Los Angeles Times)

    The DMV launched an investigation in 2021 into whether Tesla falsely markets its autonomous technology. The company brands it as “full self-driving” but California does not regulate Teslas as autonomous vehicles, so the company doesn’t have to report crash data to the state. The DMV’s investigation has yielded no public results in more than 2½ years, to the frustration of some state lawmakers.

    The governor also clashed with lawmakers over autonomous vehicles earlier this year when he vetoed a bill to require human safety drivers in self-driving big-rig trucks — a measure that sailed through the Legislature with bipartisan support. Newsom said the bill was unnecessary because of the state’s existing system for regulating the evolving technology.

    “DMV continuously monitors the testing and operations of autonomous vehicles on California roads and has the authority to suspend or revoke permits as necessary to protect the public’s safety,” he wrote in the veto message.

    Peter Finn, a vice president of the International Brotherhood of Teamsters, which sponsored the bill to require human drivers on autonomous trucks, said the union will keep pushing because both safety and jobs are at stake.

    “We’re not backing away from this fight. We’re going to double down in terms of pursuing fair and responsible guardrails to this technology,” he said.

    He called Newsom “completely out of touch with California residents” on the issue of autonomous vehicles.

    There’s no sign that Newsom’s zeal for automotive innovation will subside. In addition to touring the Shanghai Tesla factory, while in China Newsom test drove a hybrid SUV made by Chinese manufacturer BYD. He took his hands off the wheel and waved to reporters as the car went into automated mode and rotated in a full 360-degree turn.

    “This is another leap of the technology. Next level,” Newsom marveled from behind the wheel of the vehicle, which played the Eagles’ song “Hotel California” on the sound system when he turned it on.

    Gov. Gavin Newsom test drives a BYD brand SUV during a visit to Shenzhen, China, on October 24, 2023.

    Gov. Gavin Newsom test drives an SUV with autonomous features made by BYD during a visit to Shenzhen, China, on Oct. 24.

    (Laurel Rosenhall / Los Angeles Times)

    The governor said he first experienced driverless technology many years ago during a visit to Google with company founders Sergey Brin and Larry Page. Four years ago, at the Sears Point raceway in Sonoma County, Newsom said he rode in an “Audi going 160 miles an hour with no one in the driver’s seat.”

    Newsom also expressed excitement about aviation innovation underway in California. Drone-like electric planes are being tested across the state by Silicon Valley tech companies pitching the vision of clean, quiet flying taxis to get people off clogged freeways. Two companies, Archer and Joby, plan to launch with pilots while a company called Wisk is developing an autonomous air taxi.

    Joby reported hiring a Sacramento lobbying firm for the first time in July, and one of its lobbyists, Michael Picker, is a former president of the Public Utilities Commission, which regulates taxis and rideshare companies.

    Asked if he had safety concerns with autonomous technology, the governor echoed industry talking points that human drivers who can get drunk or sleepy behind the wheel are more dangerous than driverless cars.

    “I think we’re gonna look back in 20 to 30 years and go, why were we allowed to drive? And allow 30-plus-thousand Americans to die every single year in accidents?” Newsom said. “There’s a precision with the technology, but it has to be worked through. I just think it’s mesmerizing, the change that’s about to come.”

    Times staff writer Anabel Sosa contributed to this report.

    [ad_2]

    Laurel Rosenhall

    Source link

  • Cruise sidelines entire U.S. robotaxi fleet to focus on rebuilding ‘public trust’

    Cruise sidelines entire U.S. robotaxi fleet to focus on rebuilding ‘public trust’

    [ad_1]

    In the wake of California withdrawing Cruise’s permit to operate self-driving cars in the state, the company announced that it’s suspending all U.S. robotaxi operations.

    The move comes after the California Department of Motor Vehicles alleged that Cruise withheld from regulators video footage of a Cruise robotaxi dragging a person down a city street.

    The future for the company is uncertain. Its parent company, General Motors, has lost $1.9 billion on Cruise so far this year, including a $732-million loss in the third quarter, according to its latest earnings report. Competitor Ford shut down its Argo robotaxi unit in 2022, concluding that the possibility of far-off profits weren’t worth the enormous cash drain.

    The California DMV gave two reasons for suspending Cruise’s license this week: concerns about safety and claims that the company withheld from regulators video footage that showed a Cruise robotaxi drag an already injured woman 20 feet across street pavement before emergency workers could reach her.

    “The most important thing for us right now is to take steps to rebuild public trust,” Cruise said in a statement online Thursday night. “Part of this involves taking a hard look inwards and at how we do work at Cruise.”

    Cruise vehicles with humans behind the wheel will continue to operate. Until this week, the company had been operating driverless services in San Francisco, Phoenix, Miami, Houston and Austin, Texas.

    Cruise needs to be “extra vigilant when it comes to risk, relentlessly focused on safety” as it rebuilds public trust, a spokeswoman told The Times.

    The incident marks a dark chapter in the emerging history of the automated vehicle industry. Whether Cruise’s actions will harm the industry’s reputation, or only its own, remains to be seen.

    Robotaxi companies claim that autonomous vehicles are already safer than cars driven by humans. Officials in San Francisco say they’re having trouble getting these companies to provide adequate data to prove that. But Cruise is dealing with more than safety in this case — it’s dealing with allegations that it misled regulators and the media in ways that might erode public trust.

    On Oct. 2, a car with a human behind the wheel hit a woman who was crossing at the intersection of 5th and Market streets in San Francisco against a red light. The pedestrian slid over the hood and into the path of a Cruise robotaxi, with no human driver. She became pinned under the car, and was later taken to a hospital.

    Cruise quickly called the crash tragic but said that the robotaxi stopped as it was supposed to and that a human driver couldn’t have reacted as quickly.

    What Cruise did not say, and what the DMV revealed Tuesday, is that after sitting still for an unspecified period of time, the robotaxi began moving forward at about 7 mph, dragging the woman with it for 20 feet.

    Cruise had shown a video of the incident to reporters but barred them from posting it publicly. (Because of that restriction, The Times turned down Cruise’s offer.) The video shown to reporters ended with the robotaxi sitting motionless, but did not include the vehicle dragging the woman.

    The DMV said Cruise showed it the same abbreviated video, and only later did the agency see the full version. The two sides are fighting about that version of events. Cruise told reporters it showed the DMV the full video from the start.

    In response to a request for comment, a spokesperson for the DMV said it stands by the facts outlined in the orders of suspension.

    Cruise Chief Executive Kyle Vogt

    (Kimberly White / Getty Images for TechCrunch)

    Controversy has surrounded the company for months, after San Francisco’s fire chief lit into Cruise and another robotaxi company, Waymo, for interfering with firetrucks and emergency workers. Police said robotaxis were getting in their way too.

    Dozens of such incidents have been reported, including robotaxis blocking an ambulance from exiting a firehouse, driving onto fire hoses and parking themselves there, bursting through police tape and getting tangled in downed utility wires. Cruise robotaxis sometimes gather together up to a dozen at a time to block pedestrians and other cars at busy intersections, a phenomenon whose cause remains a mystery, at least to the public.

    Nonetheless, the California Public Utilities Commission, which regulates taxi fares, voted to allow a massive expansion of robotaxi service across San Francisco. Cruise Chief Executive Kyle Vogt soon started talking about big plans for explosive growth, including the introduction next year of a six-passenger pod-like vehicle with no steering wheel called the Origin. “The goal is to get to scale as quickly as we can in terms of the total number of AVs to make this business profitable and sustainable,” he said at the TechCrunch Disrupt conference in September.

    Waymo, owned by Google parent Alphabet, is also planning to grow its fleets and move into new cities. It has already launched in Santa Monica and will soon expand to Los Angeles. Los Angeles officials are trying to get a close look at company plans, but are stymied by state law that gives cities little authority over robotaxi operations.

    Other robotaxi companies are also gearing up to expand, including Zoox and Motional. Those companies are likely to draw more scrutiny in the wake of Cruise’s setback, said Bryant Walker Smith, an automated vehicle law expert at the University of South Carolina.

    Alain Kornhauser, who heads the autonomous vehicle engineering program at Princeton, said the dragging incident is indeed tragic but it’s something that can be fixed. “The problem is, I don’t think anybody who’s writing code thought about a person being trapped under the car,” he said. “Now they can do something like mount a camera to make sure there’s no one under the car before it moves.”

    People will be forgiving of odd robotaxi behavior if they trust the companies involved, he said. “But this covering-up business and not being forthright” does long-term damage to public acceptance, he said. “Didn’t we learn from Watergate that the coverup can be worse than the crime? They could be apologetic. They could say, ‘We’re not going to do that again.’”

    [ad_2]

    Russ Mitchell

    Source link