ReportWire

Tag: racial justice

  • MLK’s Legacy of Nonviolent Protest Is More Urgent Than Ever

    Armed agents of “law and order” in Mississippi confront MLK in 1966.
    Photo: AP Photo

    During the 30 years since the United States began observing the Martin Luther King Jr. federal holiday, the commemoration of the life and work of this remarkable man has mostly seemed like a backward look at a struggle that largely succeeded. Yes, there have been regular reminders of the unfinished business of the civil-rights movement and the dangers of backsliding on the country’s commitment to equality and justice. But the sense that we urgently needed to relearn the lessons King once taught us was often lacking — until now.

    In 2026, the country is governed by a regime as aggressive in its reactionary demands to obstruct and reverse social change as the southern local and state governments that fought and jailed MLK were. White-supremacist sentiment is being proclaimed again after decades of being too disreputable to say out loud. Perversion of the Christian Gospel to justify hatred and violence is as widespread as it was when white churches defended racial segregation as holy. And now, as then, advocates for “law and order” regard protest as insurrection and protesters as terrorists (or as George Wallace used to call them, anarchists).

    Millions of Americans seeking a way to cope with the Donald Trump administration and its excesses need to rediscover the legacy of nonviolent protest MLK embodied. Like his role model Mahatma Gandhi, King taught that firm but civil disobedience in the face of injustice is both powerful and difficult to defeat, in part because it denies oppressors the excuse of personal or institutional self-defense and exposes the brutality of those who seek to provoke violence. Although MLK was not present on the Edmund Pettus Bridge in Selma, Alabama, on March 7, 1965, many of his disciples were, and televised images of their being clubbed to the pavement and attacked by police dogs that day probably did more to advance the cause of civil-rights legislation than anything that happened during the many decades of Jim Crow. Today’s protesters need not be willing to make such sacrifices to learn that exchanges of blows with law enforcement mostly benefit those who equate dissent with civil war, rather than civil rights.

    Aside from the strategy and tactics King adopted to move a long-complacent nation toward at least a semblance of racial equality (and had he not been murdered, perhaps economic equality), he also stood tall for universal values against the moral relativism of nationalists and nativists, who — then as now — show no respect for people outside their cult of blood and soil. In this he followed the teachings of Jesus Christ, who commanded love for the stranger, the prisoner, the despised outcast, even one’s enemies. King also understood that both the professed religious beliefs of most Americans and the civic creed of Americanism rely on a commitment to equality and a healthy disrespect for the idols of wealth and power. Most of all, MLK was firm in his conviction that true patriotism is aspirational, rather than a celebration of current or past “greatness.” He deeply believed in his country as a dream, rather than as a perfected society where criticism is treason.

    Perhaps the future of this country isn’t as dark and forbidding as it can seem at the beginning of 2026. It’s possible the drift into police-state authoritarianism can be reversed. Maybe the wars and rumors of war breaking out almost daily won’t burst into an orgy of killing or plans for a new American empire. But for the time being, King’s example of courage and conviction remains very useful, particularly for those whose peaceful protests are met with armed repression.

    It’s not a coincidence that one of MLK’s most important essays was titled “Letter From a Birmingham Jail.” From behind bars, he argued that “injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere,” upbraided Christian ministers for their hypocritical demands for unjust peace, and expressed faith in his ultimate vindication. It’s a good time to reread his words and emulate his example. Keep in mind that the people now running the country have officially turned the civil-rights movement on its head by pretending the only victims of injustice worth defending are white men and the only refugees worth rescuing are white South Africans. Like Sisyphus in the Greek myths, Americans have watched the rock roll back down the hill during the long struggle for equality. MLK’s legacy inspires us to reject despair and keep up the fight.


    See All



    Ed Kilgore

    Source link

  • Policy changes are needed to address health inequities, IBX forum speakers say

    Policy changes are needed to address health inequities, IBX forum speakers say

    Level the playing field.

    That was the message of the “Catalyzing Change” event hosted by the Independence Blue Cross Foundation on Tuesday at the Kimmel Center. Attempt to right the wrongs built up by years of racial and gender discrimination in the health care system, so that the next generation doesn’t have to deal with those same issues.


    MOREGreater diversity among organ donors increases the possibility that people on waiting lists find good matches


    It’s part of an ongoing effort to educate the public and emphasize to those who control the purse strings how critical this is.

    “The important thing is to level the playing field so everybody can participate,” IBX Foundation President Lorina Marshall-Blake said. “We have to find a way for them to all be at the table.

    “It shouldn’t matter your race, creed, gender, sexual orientation. Stop talking about what you’re going to do and do something. … Make sure those who don’t have it will have it.”

    Her remarks followed two panel discussions that detailed the barriers at the local and national levels. The first featured three health care professionals who talked about everything from the way health care workers are assessed, to the joys of working with people from birth to death, to the fact that only one penny of every dollar given philanthropically goes to nurses. 

    “I think we’re worth more than that given our value and our mission,” said Roberta Waite, dean and professor at Georgetown School of Nursing, who was joined on the panel by Eliza E. Heppner, acting Deputy Associate Administrator for the Health, Resources and Services Administration, and Dr. Leon McCrea II, vice dean for educational affairs at Drexel University. “We have inequity right now because that’s what we have designed.

    “That’s what our policies have to bear. We have an obligation to look at it.”

    Following that came a national panel featuring Anna Heard, senior policy analyst for the National Governors Association and Gindhar Maliya, senior policy officer, of the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. They talked about the obstacles faced in overcoming inequity, especially in today’s polarized political climate.

    Health Equity IBX 2Jon Marks/For PhillyVoice

    Roberta Waite, dean of Georgetown School of Nursing; Leon McCrea II, vice dean for educational affairs at Drexel University; Eliza Heppner, acting deputy health administrator for the Health Resources and Services Administration; and TaRhonda Thomas, a 6ABC reporter, take part in a panel discussion at the ‘Catalyzing Change’ health care forum hosted by the IBX Foundation on Tuesday.

    “Our policies have been fundamental to racial inequities dating back to slavery and Jim Crow,” said Maliya. “States are laboratories of democracy sometimes for better or worse.

    “Every state has increased access to health care and there’s evidence to show it is good investment. 

    “But when it comes to the focus on DEI (Diversity, Equity and Inclusion) there is a concerted, very well-funded effort in this country to portray it as divisive, illegal and un-American. Our people are dedicated to show that’s a misconception. When DEI works, it has potential to benefit all of us.”

    Stephen P. Fera, executive vice president of public affairs at IBX, said things need to change now. He noted the IBX Foundation expects to have awarded more than $85 million by the end of the year, dating back to its inception in 2011. 

    “What we do with this is critical,” Fera said. “If we don’t, we’ll be having the same conversation three, five or more years from now with no better results for the health care system.

    “We’d better get busy.”

    Otherwise, the panels stressed, the playing field will continue being more and more uneven.

    Jon Marks, PhillyVoice Contributor

    Source link

  • The Topic Biden Keeps Dodging

    The Topic Biden Keeps Dodging

    President Joe Biden is following a strategy of asymmetrical warfare as the 2024 presidential race takes shape.

    Through the early maneuvering, the leading Republican candidates, particularly former President Donald Trump and Florida Governor Ron DeSantis are trying to ignite a procession of culture-war firefights against what DeSantis calls “the woke mind virus.”

    With the exception of abortion rights, Biden, by contrast, is working to downplay or defuse almost all cultural issues. Instead Biden is targeting his communication with the public almost exclusively on delivering tangible economic benefits to working-class families, such as lower costs for insulin, the protection of Social Security and Medicare, and the creation of more manufacturing jobs.

    While the leading Republican presidential contenders are effectively asking voters “Who shares your values?” or, in the harshest versions, “Who shares your resentments?,” Biden wants voters to ask “Who is on your side?”

    The distinction is not absolute. Trump, DeSantis, and the other Republicans circling the 2024 race argue that Biden’s spending programs have triggered inflation, and insist that lower taxes, budget cuts, and more domestic energy production would spur more growth. And in addition to their unwavering defense of abortion rights, Biden and his aides have also occasionally criticized some of the other Republican cultural initiatives, such as DeSantis’s “Don’t Say Gay” bill banning discussion of sexual orientation in early grades.

    But the difference in emphasis is real, and the contrast illuminates the core of Biden’s vision about how to sustain a national majority for Democrats. He’s betting that the non-college-educated workers, especially those who are white, who constitute the principal audience for the Republican cultural offensive will prove less receptive to those divisive messages if they feel more economically secure.

    “We need to reforge that identity as the party that gives a damn about people who feel forgotten, who have really tough lives right now,” says the Democratic strategist Mike Lux, who recently released a study of political attitudes in mostly blue-collar, midsize “factory towns” across the Midwest. “That’s the central mission. And that’s why I think Biden is right to be focusing on those economic issues first.”

    But other Democrats worry that Biden’s economy-first approach risks allowing Republicans such as DeSantis to define themselves as championing parents while advancing an agenda that civil-rights advocates believe promotes exclusion and bigotry. They also fear that Biden’s reluctance to engage more directly with Republicans over the rollback of rights raging through red states risks dispiriting the core Democratic constituencies, including Black Americans and the LGBTQ community, that face the most direct consequences from restrictions on how teachers and professors can talk about race or bans on gender-affirming care for minors. These Democrats have grown even more uneasy as Biden lately has moved toward Republican positions on immigration (with new restrictions on asylum seekers) and crime (by indicating that he would not block congressional efforts to reverse a reform-oriented overhaul of Washington, D.C.’s criminal code.)

    “Not engaging in culture wars does not mean that Democrats win: It means that we forfeit,” says Terrance Woodbury, chief executive officer and founding partner of HIT Strategies, a Democratic consulting firm that focuses on young and minority voters. The group’s polling, Woodbury told me, shows that “not only do Democratic voters expect Democratic leaders to do more to advance social and racial justice” but that “they will punish Democrats that do not.”

    My conversations with Democrats familiar with White House thinking, however, suggest that Biden and those around him don’t share that perspective. In that inner circle, I’m told, the dominant view is that the best way to respond to the culture-war onslaught from Republicans is to engage with it as little as possible. Those around Biden do not believe that the positions Republicans are adopting on questions such as classroom censorship, book bans, LGBTQ rights, and allowing people to carry firearms without a permit, much less restricting or banning abortion, will prove popular with voters beyond the core conservative states.

    More fundamentally, Biden’s circle believes that voters don’t want to be subjected to fights about such polarizing cultural issues and would prefer that elected officials focus more on daily economic concerns such as inflation, jobs, and health care. Those around Biden largely share the view expressed by the Democratic pollster Guy Molyneux, who studied public attitudes about key GOP educational proposals in two national surveys last year. “People don’t really want either side of these culture wars to win; they want to just stop having these culture wars,” Molyneux told me. “They really see a lot of this as a diversion.” A national survey released this week by Navigator, a Democratic polling consortium, supports Molyneux’s point: When asked to identify their top priorities in education, far more voters cited reducing gun violence and ensuring that kids learn skills that will help them succeed than picked “preventing them from being exposed to woke ideas about race and gender.”

    Biden hasn’t completely sidestepped the culture wars. After mostly avoiding the issue earlier in his presidency, he’s been relentless in his defense of abortion rights since the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade last summer. (Earlier this year, Vice President Kamala Harris commemorated what would have been the 50th anniversary of Roe with a speech in Tallahassee, Florida, where she targeted DeSantis’s signing of legislation banning abortion there after 15 weeks.) When DeSantis signed the “Don’t Say Gay” bill last year, the White House also criticized him. And most recently in Selma, Alabama, Biden has also issued tough criticisms of the red-state laws erecting new hurdles to voting.

    Yet the Biden administration, and especially the president himself, has mostly kept its distance from the surging tide of bills advancing in Florida and other red states rolling back a broad range of civil rights and liberties. Tellingly, when Biden traveled to Florida last month, it was not to condemn DeSantis’s agenda of restrictions on classroom teachers or transgender minors, but to defend Social Security, Medicare, and the Affordable Care Act; the only time he mentioned DeSantis by name was to criticize him for refusing to expand eligibility for Medicaid health coverage under the ACA.

    Since the midterm elections, Biden has centered his public appearances on cutting ribbons for infrastructure projects and new clean-energy or semiconductor plants funded by the troika of massive public-investment bills he signed during his first two years; defending Social Security and Medicare; highlighting lower drug prices from the legislation he passed allowing Medicare to bargain for better deals with pharmaceutical companies; and combatting “junk fees” from airlines, hotels, and other companies. In his State of the Union address last month, Biden spoke at length about those economic plans and what he calls his “blue-collar blueprint to rebuild America” before he mentioned any social issues, such as police reform, gun control, and abortion. The budget Biden will release today advances these themes by proposing to extend the solvency of Medicare by raising taxes on the affluent.

    The emphasis was very different in marquee appearances last weekend from Trump and DeSantis. Trump, in his long monologue on Saturday at CPAC, accused Biden of exacerbating inflation and promised to pursue an all-out trade war with China. But those comments came deep into a nearly two-hour speech in which Trump blurred the boundary between calling on his supporters to engage in a culture war and an actual civil war, when he promised to be their “retribution” against elites and “woke tyranny.”

    When DeSantis spoke at the Ronald Reagan Presidential Library, northwest of Los Angeles, last Sunday, he delivered more of an economic message, attributing Florida’s robust population growth in part to its low taxes and low spending. But he drew a much more passionate reaction from his audience later when he denounced the “woke mind virus,” recounted his stand during the coronavirus pandemic against “the biomedical security state,” and pledged to “empower parents” against the educational establishment. DeSantis received his only standing ovation when he declared that schools “should not be teaching a second grader that they can choose their gender.”

    To some extent, the heavy reliance by Trump and DeSantis on these cultural confrontations reflects their belief that GOP primary voters are much more energized now by social rather than economic issues. Yet it also represents the widespread GOP belief that distaste for liberal positions on cultural issues remains an insuperable barrier for Democrats with most working-class voters, including a growing number of Latino men. “Blue-collar voters don’t separate cultural concerns from economic fears,” the GOP strategist Brad Todd, a co-author of The Great Revolt, told me in an email. “They think big global companies are in cahoots with the left on culture, and they don’t put pocketbook concerns ahead of way-of-life concerns.”

    Todd thinks Biden’s attempt to define himself mostly around economic rather than cultural commitments represents his desire “to jump in a time machine and go back to the Democratic Party of the ’80s.” Indeed, Biden, who was first elected to the Senate in 1972, came of age politically in an era when Republicans repeatedly used racially infused “wedge issues” to pry away working-class white voters who had mostly supported Democrats on economic grounds over the previous generation. Some Democrats see Biden’s recent moves to adopt more right-leaning policies on immigration and crime as a resurgence of that era’s widespread Democratic belief that the party needed to neutralize cultural issues, typically by conceding ground to conservative positions.

    Like others I spoke with, Jenifer Fernandez Ancona, the vice president and chief strategy officer at Way to Win, believes that focusing primarily on economic issues makes sense for Biden now, but that he will eventually be forced to address the GOP’s cultural arguments more directly. Sublimating those issues, she argues, isn’t sustainable, because it is “hurting the very people” Democrats now rely on to win and because the Republican cultural arguments, left unaddressed, could prove very persuasive to not only working-class white voters but also Hispanic and even Black men. Ultimately, Fernandez said, Biden and other Democrats must link the two fronts by convincing working-class voters that Republicans are picking cultural fights to distract them from an economic agenda that mostly benefits the rich. “We have to put to bed this idea [that] we can have an economic message that doesn’t address the racial grievance and fear of change that is at the center of all this culture-war stuff,” argued Fernandez, whose group funds candidates and organizations focused on building a multiracial electoral coalition.

    The debate among Democrats ultimately comes down to whether Biden is skillfully controlling the electoral battlefield or trying to resurrect a coalition that no longer exists (centered on working-class families) at the expense of dividing or demoralizing the coalition the party actually relies on today (revolving around young people, college-educated white voters, and racial minority voters). Several Democratic strategists told me that one obvious challenge with Biden’s trying to define the election around the question of which party can deliver the best economic results for working-class families is that polls throughout his presidency have found that more Americans would pick the GOP. “People still think that Trump economics was better for them than Biden or Obama economics,” Celinda Lake, who served as one of Biden’s lead campaign pollsters in 2020, told me.

    To Lake, that’s an argument for Biden’s strategy of stressing kitchen-table concerns, because she believes the party cannot win unless it narrows the GOP advantage on the economy. But other Democrats believe today’s party is less likely to persuade a national majority that it is better than Republicans for their finances than it is to convince them that the Trump-era GOP constitutes a threat to their rights, values, and democracy itself. Biden’s response to the Republican initiatives censoring teachers, rolling back abortion access, and threatening LGBTQ rights “simply cannot be ‘more jobs,’” Woodbury said. “If Democrats insist on fighting exclusively on economic terms, every poll in America shows they will lose.”

    Ronald Brownstein

    Source link