ReportWire

Tag: Fraud and false statements

  • Former employee admits defrauding Apple of $17 million

    Former employee admits defrauding Apple of $17 million

    [ad_1]

    SAN JOSE, Calif. — A former Apple employee pleaded guilty Tuesday to defrauding the tech giant out of more than $17 million over seven years, federal prosecutors said.

    In a written plea agreement, Dhirendra Prasad described the schemes he carried out while he worked as a buyer for Apple’s Global Service Supply chain, the U.S. Attorney’s Office said.

    Prasad admitted the fraud involved “taking kickbacks, inflating invoices, stealing parts, and causing Apple to pay for items and services never received,” prosecutors said in a statement.

    For one scheme, prosecutors said Prasad arranged to have Apple components shipped to an outside vendor’s warehouse, where they were repackaged and eventually sold back to Apple.

    “Prasad admitted these schemes continued through 2018 and ultimately resulted in a loss to Apple of more than $17 million,” the statement said.

    Prosecutors said Prasad, 52, entered guilty pleas on multiple counts including conspiracy to commit fraud and conspiracy to defraud the United States.

    He could face more than 20 years in prison when he’s sentenced next March.

    Two of his co-conspirators, outside vendors who did business with Apple, have been charged in separate federal cases.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Election conspiracy theorists jailed in Texas lawsuit

    Election conspiracy theorists jailed in Texas lawsuit

    [ad_1]

    HOUSTON — The leaders of a Texas-based group that promotes election conspiracy theories were jailed Monday for not complying with a court order to provide information in a defamation lawsuit over some of their claims.

    Catherine Engelbrecht and Gregg Phillips, who run True the Vote, were ordered detained by U.S. Marshals, according to an order signed by U.S. District Judge Kenneth Hoyt in Houston. They will be held for at least one day or “until they fully comply with the Court’s Order,” Hoyt wrote.

    Houston-based True the Vote provided research for a debunked documentary that alleged widespread voter fraud in the 2020 election. Engelbrecht, Phillips and their nonprofit organization are being sued by Michigan-based election software provider Konnech Inc. over True the Vote’s claims of a Chinese-related conspiracy involving U.S. poll workers’ information.

    Alfredo Perez, a spokesman for the U.S. Marshals Service in Houston, said Monday that Engelbrecht and Phillips were in the law enforcement agency’s custody.

    True the Vote said in a statement read during a video livestream Monday that its attorneys would appeal Hoyt’s ruling.

    Konnech provides election software used to recruit and train poll workers. It has accused Engelbrecht, Phillips and their group of falsely claiming that Konnech stored the personal information of U.S. election workers in an unsecured server in China.

    The lawsuit also alleges True the Vote’s leaders illegally downloaded from Konnech’s server the personal data of 1.8 million U.S. poll workers.

    Konnech says all of its U.S. customer data is secured and stored on “protected computers within the United States.”

    Hoyt issued a temporary restraining order earlier in October telling Engelbrecht and Phillips to return all data belonging to Konnech and reveal the names of anyone who helped access it.

    In a court hearing last week, Phillips declined to reveal the name of an analyst who reviewed the data.

    True the Vote quoted Engelbrecht in its statement as saying that the group does not believe the person was covered by Hoyt’s disclosure order.

    Konnech’s lawsuit accuses Engelbrecht and Phillips of “racism and xenophobia” by making “baseless claims” that “the Chinese Communist Party is somehow controlling U.S. elections through Konnech because its founder and some of its employees are of Chinese descent.”

    Konnech’s CEO and founder, Eugene Yu, 65, is a naturalized U.S. citizen who was born in China, according to his attorneys. He has lived with his family in Michigan for more than 20 years.

    Engelbrecht and Phillips have pointed out that Los Angeles County prosecutors recently charged Yu with grand theft by embezzlement and conspiracy to commit a crime.

    Prosecutors allege that Konnech violated its contract with Los Angeles County by sending election workers’ information to a China-based subcontractor who helped fix Konnech software.

    Gary S. Lincenberg, one of Yu’s attorneys, has denied the allegations.

    “This is a deeply misguided prosecution that attempts to criminalize what is, at best, a civil breach of contract claim involving poll worker management software,” Lincenberg said last week in a court filing.

    True the Vote’s claims of election fraud have been widely discredited.

    Cellphone data analysis done by True the Vote was used by conservative filmmaker Dinesh D’Souza in his film “2000 Mules” to try to show that Democratic operatives were paid to illegally collect and drop off ballots in Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin.

    Independent fact-checkers, including at The Associated Press, found that True the Vote did not prove its claims. Election security experts say it is based on faulty assumptions, anonymous accounts and improper analysis of cellphone location data. Georgia election officials also have said the claims are false.

    ———

    Follow Juan A. Lozano on Twitter: https://twitter.com/juanlozano70

    ———

    Associated Press writer Terry Wallace in Dallas contributed to this report.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Georgia man sues over false ballot fraud claim in film

    Georgia man sues over false ballot fraud claim in film

    [ad_1]

    ATLANTA — A Georgia man and his family “have faced threats of violence and live in fear” since the movie “2000 Mules” falsely accused him of ballot fraud during the 2020 election, according to a federal lawsuit.

    The widely debunked film includes surveillance video showing Mark Andrews, his face blurred, depositing five ballots in a drop box in downtown Lawrenceville, a suburb northeast of Atlanta. A voiceover by conservative pundit and filmmaker Dinesh D’Souza says: “What you are seeing is a crime. These are fraudulent votes.”

    In fact, a state investigation found, Andrews was dropping off ballots for himself, his wife and their three adult children, who all live at the same address. That is legal in Georgia and a state investigator said there was no evidence of wrongdoing by Andrews.

    D’Souza’s film uses research from the Texas-based nonprofit True the Vote and suggests that ballot “mules” aligned with Democrats were paid to illegally collect and deliver ballots in Georgia and four other closely watched states. An Associated Press analysis found that it is based on faulty assumptions, anonymous accounts and improper analysis of cellphone location data.

    State and federal officials have repeatedly confirmed that there is no evidence of widespread voter fraud during the 2020 election that could have changed the outcome of the presidential race.

    The lawsuit names D’Souza and True the Vote, as well as the organization’s executive director Catherine Engelbrecht and Gregg Phillips, who has served on its board. Both Engelbrecht and Phillips appear throughout the film and served as executive producers and producers, the lawsuit says.

    D’Souza did not immediately respond Friday to a request for comment submitted through his website. Engelbrecht and True the Vote have not responded to emails seeking comment, and contact information for Phillips could not be immediately located.

    “At all times, Defendants knew that their portrayals of Mr. Andrews were lies, as was the entire narrative of 2000 Mules,” the lawsuit says. “But they have continued to peddle these lies in order to enrich themselves.”

    Their social media accounts and website continue to promote the film using Andrews “as an example of a criminal ‘mule,’” the lawsuit says. While Andrews’ face was blurred in the film, video shown when the defendants were interviewed sometimes clearly showed his face and the license plate on his SUV, the lawsuit says.

    The false accusations have caused distress for Andrews and his family, the lawsuit says.

    “They feel intimidated to vote and have changed how they vote because of that fear,” it says. “They worry that again they will be baselessly accused of election crimes, and that believers in the ‘mules’ theory may recognize and seek reprisal against them, and that they may face physical harm.”

    Andrews, who is Black, grew up in Jacksonville, Florida, before federal voting rights laws were passed and his “family taught him that his community and ancestors had fought, marched, and died for the right to vote,” the lawsuit says. Because of the “conspiracy to defame and intimidate him,” the suit says, “he will never again be able to vote without looking over his shoulder.”

    Among other things, the lawsuit seeks an unspecified amount in damages and asks that false and defamatory statements about Andrews be removed from any website or social media accounts that the defendants control.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Trump opposes watchdog for financial statements sought by New York Attorney General James in sweeping fraud lawsuit

    Trump opposes watchdog for financial statements sought by New York Attorney General James in sweeping fraud lawsuit

    [ad_1]

    Former U.S. President Donald Trump throws caps as he attends a rally in Warren, Michigan, U.S., October 1, 2022.

    Dieu-nalio Chery | Reutersm

    Former President Donald Trump and related defendants are opposing New York Attorney General Letitia James’ call for an independent monitor to oversee the Trump Organization’s submission of financial statements to third parties as part of a bombshell fraud lawsuit, according to a new court filing.

    James has asked a judge to name a watchdog who would review financial information that the company and defendants give lenders, insurers and accountants pending the outcome of the lawsuit.

    The attorney general’s office requested the watchdog as part of a sweeping September lawsuit accusing Trump, three of his adult children, their company and others of a decadelong fraud related to financial statements.

    In their court filing Wednesday, Trump’s lawyers said James’ request for an outside monitor for the company is “a politically motivated attempt to nationalize a highly successful private enterprise.” The lawyers argued that it “is precluded under our Constitution and must and should therefore be rejected.”

    CNBC Politics

    Read more of CNBC’s politics coverage:

    James’ suit in Manhattan Supreme Court accuses the former president and the Trump Organization of repeatedly misstating the value of various real estate assets and his net worth on financial statements that were used to obtain loans, insurance policies and tax benefits.

    She claims Trump overstated his net worth by billions of dollars, and has asked federal prosecutors in Manhattan and the IRS to investigate him for possible federal crimes. James said evidence obtained during her three-year civil probe of Trump indicated possible crimes of bank fraud and making false statements to financial institutions.

    James’ suit seeks about $250 million in penalties.

    The Trump defense filing Wednesday flatly rejects her allegations of fraud.

    “Even the excerpted and selected transcripts and documents fail to show the Trump Parties have ever even been late on so much as one loan payment over the past decade much less engaged in any actual fraud,” the filing said.

    Trump’s lawyers accuse the attorney general of manufacturing “a bill of grievances based on nothing more than a misapplication of standard accounting principles and gross exaggeration of routine valuation differences between counter parties to complex commercial lending transactions,” according to the filing.

    The filing said the monitor she requests would possess “staggeringly overbroad” powers because the person would have access to “all of the Trump Parties’ financial records, compelling the Trump Parties to make onerous informational disclosures to the monitor, and grant the monitor operational oversight over the financial affairs of private businesses.”

    James’ request “would effectively allow the NYAG to nationalize the Trump business empire,” the lawyers claimed.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Fake billionaire, Harvard MBA grad Justin Costello denied bail after judge calls him ‘economic danger’ to public

    Fake billionaire, Harvard MBA grad Justin Costello denied bail after judge calls him ‘economic danger’ to public

    [ad_1]

    FBI Poster for Justin Costello

    FBI

    Butcher wrote that the evidence itself is the least important factor in his decision to keep Costello in jail.

    But, he added, “when taken together with the significant [prison] sentence Defendant faces if convicted, the Court finds Defendant has a serious incentive to flee.”

    Costello’s lawyer Cindy Muro did not respond to messages seeking comment.

    Costello, who has ties to Washington, Las Vegas and California, is due in San Diego court later Tuesday for another hearing related to his expected transfer to Washington state to face trial.

    He is accused in the indictment of swindling thousands of investors and others in complicated schemes involving penny stocks, shell companies and a banking firm that did business with three unrelated cannabis companies. The Securities and Exchange Commission has sued Costello and another man, 44-year-old Radford, Virginia, resident David Ferraro, in a civil case alleging related fraudulent conduct.

    CNBC Politics

    Read more of CNBC’s politics coverage:

    Among other allegations, Costello is accused of using social media sites to coordinate false claims about publicly traded stocks to manipulate their prices so he could profit.

    As part of the alleged scams, Costello falsely claimed to be worth a billion dollars or more and to have served two tours in Iraq as a member of the special forces, where he purportedly was shot twice. He also claimed to have “managed money for wealthy individuals, including a Saudi sheikh,” and that “he had 14 years of experience on Wall Street,” the indictment said.

    “None of that is true,” a press release by U.S. Attorney’s Office for Washington said.

    Prosecutors have said that Costello agreed through his then-lawyer to surrender in late September to face the indictment after being informed it was set to be filed. But he never showed up as agreed at the FBI’s office in San Diego, and went on the lam.

    On Oct. 4, an FBI SWAT team found Costello in a remote area near San Diego, carrying a backpack containing tens of thousands of dollars in U.S. and Mexican currency, six one-ounce gold bars, banking cards and checkbooks and a Washington state driver’s license in the name of “Christian Bolter.”

    Cash and gold bars as detailed in court filing in US District court in San Diego in case of former fugitive Justin Costello.

    Source: US District Court

    Prosecutors said the FBI was able to locate Costello by tracking him on his cell phone.

    Costello pleaded not guilty during an arraignment in San Diego federal court a week later. He then appeared before Butcher on Oct. 18 for a detention hearing, where prosecutors asked the judge to keep him locked up.

    Butcher in his order Monday said that prosecutors had “demonstrated by clear and convincing evidence that [Costello] is an economic danger to the community and that no condition or combination of conditions will reasonably assure the safety of any other person and the community.”

    The judge cited Costello’s alleged possession of “multiple documents matching” the driver’s license bearing his photograph but the name of Bolter when he was nabbed, as well as other items that Costello could use to flee prosecution again.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Car reported stolen in 92 found buried at California mansion

    Car reported stolen in 92 found buried at California mansion

    [ad_1]

    ATHERTON, Calif. — Three decades after a car was reported stolen in Northern California, police are digging the missing convertible out of the yard of a $15 million mansion built by a man with a history of arrests for murder, attempted murder and insurance fraud.

    The convertible Mercedes Benz, filled with bags of unused concrete, was discovered Thursday by landscapers in the affluent town of Atherton in Silicon Valley, Atherton Mayor Rick DeGolia said, reading a statement from police.

    Although cadaver dogs alerted to possible human remains on Thursday, none had been found more than 24 hours after technicians with the San Mateo County Crime Lab began excavating the car, DeGolia said.

    Police believe the car was buried 4 to 5 feet (1.2 to 1.5 meters) deep in the backyard of the home sometime in the 1990s — before the current owners bought the home. The car was reported stolen in September 1992 in nearby Palo Alto, he said.

    By Friday, the technicians had been able to excavate the passenger side of the convertible, which was buried with its top down. They also opened the trunk where they found more bags of unused cement. Cadaver dogs were again brought back to the house and again “made a slight notification of possible human remains,” DeGolia said.

    Atherton Police Cmdr. Daniel Larsen said the dogs could be reacting to human remains, old bones, blood, vomit, or a combination of those things.

    He said the possible owner of the car is believed to be deceased but officials are waiting for DMV records to confirm that.

    Larsen said the current homeowners were not under investigation.

    The sprawling home with a pool and tennis court was built by Johnny Lew, a man with a history of arrests for murder, attempted murder and insurance fraud, his daughter, Jacq Searle, told the San Francisco Chronicle.

    She said the family lived at the property in the 1990s, which is when Atherton police believe the car was buried and that her father had died in 2015 in Washington state.

    In 1966, Lew was found guilty of murdering a 21-year-old woman in Los Angeles County. He was released from prison after the California Supreme Court reversed the conviction in 1968, citing hearsay evidence that should not have been allowed at trial, The Chronicle reported, citing court records.

    Records showed that in 1977 Lew was convicted of two counts of attempted murder, also in Los Angeles County, and spent three years in prison.

    In the late 1990s, Lew was arrested for insurance fraud after he hired undercover police officers to take a $1.2 million yacht “out west of the Golden Gate Bridge into international waters and put it on the bottom,” The Chronicle reported.

    Larsen wouldn’t say if police believe the vehicle was registered to Lew.

    “We have heard that name come up, but we have not confirmed through our sources that he in fact owned that vehicle,” Larsen said.

    The sprawling home and property is valued at least $15 million, according to online real estate listings.

    Atherton is one of the wealthiest towns in the U.S., with about 7,000 residents within its nearly 5 square miles (13 square kilometers).

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Ex-UCLA gynecologist found guilty in LA sex abuse case

    Ex-UCLA gynecologist found guilty in LA sex abuse case

    [ad_1]

    LOS ANGELES — A former gynecologist at the University of California, Los Angeles was found guilty Thursday of five counts of sexually abusing female patients, in a criminal case that came after the university system made nearly $700 million in lawsuit payouts.

    The Los Angeles jury found Dr. James Heaps, a longtime UCLA campus gynecologist, not guilty of seven of the 21 counts and were deadlocked on the remaining charges.

    In the wake of the scandal that erupted in 2019 following the doctor’s arrest, UCLA agreed to pay nearly $700 million in lawsuit settlements to hundreds of Heaps’ patients — a record amount by a public university amid a wave of sexual misconduct scandals by campus doctors in recent years.

    Heaps, 65, had pleaded not guilty to 21 felony counts in the sexual assaults of seven women between 2009 and 2018. He has denied wrongdoing.

    Heaps was indicted last year on multiple counts each of sexual battery by fraud, sexual exploitation of a patient and sexual penetration of an unconscious person by fraudulent representation.

    The jury delivered a guilty verdict on three counts of sexual battery by fraud and two counts of sexual penetration of an unconscious person. He was found not guilty of seven other counts of sexual battery and penetration, as well as one count of sexual exploitation. The jury was hung on the nine remaining counts, prompting the judge to declare a mistrial for those charges.

    It was not immediately clear whether the district attorney’s office plans to refile the case on the deadlocked counts.

    Heaps’ attorney and the district attorney’s office did not immediately return requests for comment Thursday.

    “The horrible abuse he perpetrated on cancer patients and others who trusted him as their doctor has been exposed and justice was done,” attorney John Manly, who represented more than 200 women in civil cases against Heaps and UCLA, said in a statement after the verdict.

    Sex abuse by doctors on college campuses has led to massive settlements at Ohio State University, Johns Hopkins University and Columbia University.

    UCLA’s payouts exceed a $500 million settlement by Michigan State University in 2018 that was considered the largest by a public university. The University of Southern California, a private institution, has agreed to pay more than $1 billion to settle thousands of cases against the school’s longtime gynecologist, who still faces a criminal trial in Los Angeles.

    UCLA patients said Heaps groped them, made suggestive comments or conducted unnecessarily invasive exams during his 35-year career. Women who brought the lawsuits said the university ignored their complaints and deliberately concealed abuse that happened for decades during examinations at the UCLA student health center, the Ronald Reagan UCLA Medical Center or in Heaps’ campus office.

    UCLA acknowledged it received a sex abuse complaint against Heaps from a patient in December 2017 and it launched an investigation the following month that concluded she was sexually assaulted and harassed, attorneys said.

    Heaps, however, continued to practice until his retirement in June 2018. The university did not release its finding in the investigation until November 2019 — months after Heaps was arrested.

    “UCLA Health is grateful for the patients who came forward,” the university said in a statement after the verdict. “Sexual misconduct of any kind is reprehensible and intolerable. Our overriding priority is providing the highest quality care while ensuring that patients feel safe, protected and respected.”

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Ex-Suns ticket executive gets 1 year in jail in fraud scheme

    Ex-Suns ticket executive gets 1 year in jail in fraud scheme

    [ad_1]

    PHOENIX — A former Phoenix Suns ticket office executive has been sentenced to one year in jail and three years of supervised probation in connection with a fraud scheme.

    The Arizona Attorney General’s Office said Jeffrey Allen Marcussen used his position with the team to sell unused Suns tickets on a third-party vendor site for his own profit.

    Marcussen, who worked for the NBA team for more than 15 years before his resignation, was found guilty of selling tickets for his own profit between August 2017 and February 2019.

    He was charged with one count of fraud schemes and artifices, one count of theft and two counts of false return in September 2020 and pleaded guilty in the case six months ago.

    Authorities said Marcussen received more than $458,000 from the tickets that were sold.

    They said he has fully repaid the Suns and paid the nearly $12,000 owed to the Arizona Department of Revenue for his 2017 and 2018 taxes.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Key witness in Holmes trial affirms testimony against her

    Key witness in Holmes trial affirms testimony against her

    [ad_1]

    SAN JOSE, Calif. — A key witness in a trial that led to the conviction of disgraced Theranos CEO Elizabeth Holmes adamantly stood by his testimony during an unusual court appearance Monday. The prosecution witness, former Theranos lab director Adam Rosendorff, made a remorseful appearance at Holmes’ Silicon Valley home after the trial, raising questions about potential misconduct.

    The 75-minute hearing opened the same day that Holmes, 38, had been scheduled for sentencing following her conviction on four felony counts of investor fraud earlier this year. She is facing up to 20 years in prison for lying to Thrernos investors about a blood-testing technology that she promised would revolutionize health care, but that never worked the way she had boasted.

    Monday’s hearing provided what might be the final opportunity for Holmes to avoid prison if her legal team can persuade U.S. District Judge Edward Davila she deserves a new trial, based on the Rosendorff’s conduct. Rosendorff spent six days on the witness stand last year testifying for the prosecution during Holmes’ trial.

    Davila decided Rosendorff’s testimony should be re-examined after Holmes’ lawyers last month filed a request for a new trial, based on an uninvited visit that Rosendorff made on Aug. 8 to a palatial estate that Holmes shares with William “Billy” Evans, her current partner and father of their 1-year-old son.

    Although he didn’t speak to Holmes directly, Rosendorff told Evans that “he tried to answer the questions honestly but that the prosecutors tried to make everyone look bad” and felt “he had done something wrong,” according to Evans’ recollection of the conversation filed with the court.

    Under questioning by U.S. District Judge Edward Davila, Rosendorff said his testimony in the trial was truthful — a theme he would repeat throughout the hearing while also emphasizing that he believed Holmes deserved to be convicted. But he also told Davila he lamented the possibility that Holmes’ son “would spend the formative years of his life without his mother” if Holmes is sentenced to prison.

    Rosendorff then added, without explanation, that “it is my understanding she is pregnant again.” When The Associated Press asked Holmes and Evans about that after the hearing, neither responded directly. Holmes broke into a spontaneous smile while Evans complimented an AP reporter on his shoes before they entered an elevator together.

    After the judge finished his brief question, Rosendorff spent the next 50 minutes sparring with one of Holmes’ lawyers, Lance Wade, who also engaged in several testy exchanges with Rosendorff while cross- examining him during the trial.

    Wade sought to to get Rosendorff to talk about about the emotional distress he had been under since the trial and also whether he was under medication during his August visit. Rosendorff refused to answer and the judge didn’t press him on the issue.

    Rosendorff tailored most of his responses to Wade to emphasize that he testified truthfully while trying to dispel any notion that he considered Holmes to be a friend for whom he feels sorry.

    “I don’t want to help Ms. Holmes,” Rosendorff said at one point. “The only person that can help her is herself. She needs to pay her debt to society.”

    Rosendorff also tried to make clear that he believed her conviction was justified. “The government was trying to get to the truth of what happened — what Elizabeth Holmes did,” he said.

    Government prosecutors spent a brief period also reaffirming that Rosendorff doesn’t believe any misconduct occurred during the trial. Davila said he would allow both Holmes’ legal team and government prosecutors to filed additional written arguments during the next week before ruling on whether he will grant a new trial — a prospect that legal experts believe is unlikely.

    For now, Davila has scheduled Nov. 18 as Holmes’ new sentencing date. That’s three days after her former romantic and business partner, Ramesh “Sunny” Balwani, is scheduled to be sentenced. Balwani, 57, was convicted on 12 counts of investor and patient fraud in a separate trial that concluded in July.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Prosecution witness stands by testimony in Elizabeth Holmes fraud trial following post-trial visit to Holmes’ residence

    Prosecution witness stands by testimony in Elizabeth Holmes fraud trial following post-trial visit to Holmes’ residence

    [ad_1]

    Prosecution witness stands by testimony in Elizabeth Holmes fraud trial following post-trial visit to Holmes’ residence

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Head of zero-emission truck venture found guilty of fraud

    Head of zero-emission truck venture found guilty of fraud

    [ad_1]

    NEW YORK — The wealthy founder of Nikola Corp. was convicted Friday of charges he deceived investors with exaggerated claims about his company’s progress in producing zero-emission 18-wheel trucks fueled by electricity or hydrogen.

    A jury reached the verdict against Trevor Milton after deliberating for about five hours in federal court in Manhattan.

    At trial, the government had portrayed Milton as a con man while his lawyer called him an inspiring visionary who was being railroaded by overzealous prosecutors.

    Those prosecutors alleged that Nikola — founded by Milton in a Utah basement six years ago — falsely claimed to have built its own revolutionary truck that was actually a General Motors Corp. product with Nikola’s logo stamped onto it. There also was evidence that the company produced videos of its trucks that were doctored to hide their flaws.

    Called as a government witness, Nikola’s CEO testified that Milton “was prone to exaggeration” in pitching his venture to investors.

    “The lies — that is what this case is about,” prosecutor Matthew Podolsky told the jury in closing arguments Thursday.

    Defense attorney Marc Mukasey urged acquittal, saying there was “a stunning lack of evidence” that his client ever intended to cheat investors.

    Milton, 40, had pleaded not guilty to securities and wire fraud. He resigned in 2020 amid reports of fraud that sent Nikola’s stock prices into a tailspin.

    At one point, the trial was delayed for more than a week after Milton’s lawyer tested positive for the coronavirus.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Tether, world’s biggest stablecoin, cuts its commercial paper holdings to zero

    Tether, world’s biggest stablecoin, cuts its commercial paper holdings to zero

    [ad_1]

    Tether, the world’s largest stablecoin, has slashed back its commercial paper holdings to zero, replacing them with U.S. Treasury bills instead, according to a blog post. The popular U.S.-dollar-pegged cryptocurrency said the move is part of tether’s “ongoing efforts to increase transparency” and back its tokens with “the most secure reserves in the market” — in the ultimate hope of ensuring investor protection.

    There are now about 68.4 billion tether tokens in circulation, according to data from CoinMarketCapup from 2 billion three years ago. The cryptocurrency has a market capitalization of $68.4 billion.

    “Tether has led the industry in transparency releasing attestations every three months, constantly reviewing the make up of its reserves,” continued the statement.

    Commercial paper is a form of short-term, unsecured debt issued by companies, and it is considered to be less reliable than Treasury bills. In October, Tether’s Chief Technology Officer, Paolo Ardoino, tweeted that 58.1% of its assets were in T-bills, up from 43.5% in June. It is unclear where that percentage currently stands, but Ardoino did write in a post on Thursday that Tether was able to pay $7 billion, or 10% of its reserves, in 48 hours.

    “Ask your bank or other stablecoins if they can do that, in same time frame of course,” he wrote.

    Thursday’s statement went on to note that zeroing out the balance of its commercial paper holdings was also meant to be a step toward “greater transparency and trust, not only for tether but for the entire stablecoin industry.”

    The stablecoin corner of the crypto market has certainly had trust issues in the last year.

    Last year, tether had to pay a multimillion dollar fine following a legal battle with the New York attorney general’s office over concerns related to the viability of its reserves, and in May, the collapse of terraUSD (UST), which was once one of the most popular stablecoin projects, cost investors tens of billions of dollars.

    The fall of UST resulted in a falling domino effect across the wider crypto ecosystem. Part of the fallout involved tether temporarily losing its dollar peg and dipping as low as 95 cents.

    But well before UST’s dramatic implosion, Tether — the company behind the stablecoin of the same name — was facing serious regulatory backlash over its reserves.

    Most stablecoins are backed by fiat reserves, the idea being that they have enough collateral in case users decide to withdraw their funds. (UST was among a new breed of “algorithmic” stablecoins that attempt to base their dollar peg on code.)

    Previously, Tether claimed all its tokens were backed one-to-one by dollars stored in a bank. However, after a settlement with the New York attorney general, the company revealed it relied on a range of other assets, including commercial paper, to support its token.

    In April, Ardoino told CNBC that the company was well equipped to deal with mass redemptions, but New York Attorney General Letitia James’ office previously alleged that Tether sometimes held no reserves to back its cryptocurrency’s dollar peg. It said that, from mid-2017, the company had no access to banking and misled clients about liquidity issues.

    “Tether’s claims that its virtual currency was fully backed by U.S. dollars at all times was a lie,” she added. Tether said in a statement on its website that contrary to speculation, “after two and half years there was no finding that Tether ever issued tethers without backing, or to manipulate crypto prices.”

    Critics have also raised fears that tether tokens were used to manipulate bitcoin prices, a claim Tether has repeatedly denied.

    While not yet large enough to cause disruption in U.S. money markets, tether could eventually reach a size where its owning of U.S. Treasuries becomes “really scary,” Carol Alexander, a professor of finance at Sussex University, said.

    “Suppose you go down the line and, instead of $80 billion, we’ve got $200 billion, and most of that is in liquid U.S. government securities,” she said. “Then a crash in tether would have a substantial impact on U.S. money markets and would just tip the whole world into recession.”

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Former Uber security chief guilty of data breach coverup

    Former Uber security chief guilty of data breach coverup

    [ad_1]

    SAN FRANCISCO — The former chief security officer for Uber was convicted Wednesday of trying to cover up a 2016 data breach in which hackers accessed tens of millions of customer records from the ride-hailing service.

    A federal jury in San Francisco convicted Joseph Sullivan of obstructing justice and concealing knowledge that a federal felony had been committed, federal prosecutors said.

    Sullivan remains free on bond pending sentencing and could face a total of eight years in prison on the two charges when he is sentenced, prosecutors said.

    “Technology companies in the Northern District of California collect and store vast amounts of data from users,” U.S. Attorney Stephanie M. Hinds said in a statement. “We will not tolerate concealment of important information from the public by corporate executives more interested in protecting their reputation and that of their employers than in protecting users.”

    It was believed to be the first criminal prosecution of a company executive over a data breach.

    A lawyer for Sullivan, David Angeli, took issue with the verdict.

    “Mr. Sullivan’s sole focus — in this incident and throughout his distinguished career — has been ensuring the safety of people’s personal data on the internet,” Angeli told the New York Times.

    An email to Uber seeking comment on the conviction wasn’t immediately returned.

    Sullivan was hired as Uber’s chief security officer in 2015. In November 2016, Sullivan was emailed by hackers, and employees quickly confirmed that they had stolen records on about 57 million users and also 600,000 driver’s license numbers, prosecutors said.

    After learning of the breach, Sullivan began a scheme to hide it from the public and the Federal Trade Commission, which had been investigating a smaller 2014 hack, authorities said.

    According to the U.S. attorney’s office, Sullivan told subordinates that “the story outside of the security group was to be that ‘this investigation does not exist,’” and arranged to pay the hackers $100,000 in bitcoin in exchange for them signing non-disclosure agreements promising not to reveal the hack. He also never mentioned the breach to Uber lawyers who were involved with the FTC’s inquiry, prosecutors said.

    “Sullivan orchestrated these acts despite knowing that the hackers were hacking and extorting other companies as well as Uber,” the U.S. attorney’s office said.

    Uber’s new management began investigating the breach in the fall of 2017. Despite Sullivan lying to the new chief executive officer and others, the truth was uncovered and the breach was made public, prosecutors said.

    Sullivan was fired along with Craig Clark, an Uber lawyer he had told about the breach. Clark was given immunity by prosecutors and testified against Sullivan.

    No other Uber executives were charged in the case.

    The hackers pleaded guilty in 2019 to computer fraud conspiracy charges and are awaiting sentencing.

    Sullivan was convicted of of obstruction of proceedings of the Federal Trade Commission and misprision of felony, meaning concealing knowledge of a felony from authorities.

    Meanwhile, some experts have questioned how much cybersecurity has improved at Uber since the breach.

    The company announced last month that all its services were operational following what security professionals called a major data breach, claiming there was no evidence the hacker got access to sensitive user data.

    The lone hacker apparently gained access posing as a colleague, tricking an Uber employee into surrendering their credentials. Screenshots the hacker shared with security researchers indicate they obtained full access to the cloud-based systems where Uber stores sensitive customer and financial data.

    It is not known how much data the hacker stole or how long they were inside Uber’s network. There was no indication they destroyed data.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Former Uber security chief guilty of data breach coverup

    Former Uber security chief guilty of data breach coverup

    [ad_1]

    SAN FRANCISCO — The former chief security officer for Uber was convicted Wednesday of trying to cover up a 2016 data breach in which hackers accessed tens of millions of customer records from the ride-hailing service.

    A federal jury in San Francisco convicted Joseph Sullivan of obstructing justice and concealing knowledge that a federal felony had been committed, federal prosecutors said.

    Sullivan remains free on bond pending sentencing and could face a total of eight years in prison on the two charges when he is sentenced, prosecutors said.

    “Technology companies in the Northern District of California collect and store vast amounts of data from users,” U.S. Attorney Stephanie M. Hinds said in a statement. “We will not tolerate concealment of important information from the public by corporate executives more interested in protecting their reputation and that of their employers than in protecting users.”

    Sullivan was hired as Uber’s chief security officer in 2015. In November 2016, Sullivan was emailed by hackers, and employees quickly confirmed that they had stolen records on about 57 million users and also 600,000 driver’s license numbers, prosecutors said.

    After learning of the breach, Sullivan began a scheme to hide it from the public and the Federal Trade Commission, which had been investigating a smaller 2014 hack, authorities said.

    According to the U.S. attorney’s office, Sullivan told subordinates that “the story outside of the security group was to be that ‘this investigation does not exist,’” and arranged to pay the hackers $100,000 in bitcoin in exchange for them signing non-disclosure agreements promising not to reveal the hack. He also never mentioned the breach to Uber lawyers who were involved with the FTC’s inquiry, prosecutors said.

    “Sullivan orchestrated these acts despite knowing that the hackers were hacking and extorting other companies as well as Uber,” the U.S. attorney’s office said.

    Uber’s new management began investigating the breach in the fall of 2017. Despite Sullivan lying to the chief executive officer and others, the truth was uncovered and the breach was made public, prosecutors said.

    Sullivan was fired. The hackers pleaded guilty in 2019 to computer fraud conspiracy charges and are awaiting sentencing.

    An email to Uber seeking comment on the conviction wasn’t immediately returned.

    Some experts have questioned how much cybersecurity has improved at Uber since the breach.

    The company announced last month that all its services were operational following what security professionals called a major data breach, claiming there was no evidence the hacker got access to sensitive user data.

    The lone hacker apparently gained access posing as a colleague, tricking an Uber employee into surrendering their credentials. Screenshots the hacker shared with security researchers indicate they obtained full access to the cloud-based systems where Uber stores sensitive customer and financial data.

    It is not known how much data the hacker stole or how long they were inside Uber’s network. There was no indication they destroyed data.

    [ad_2]

    Source link