ReportWire

Tag: fare evasion

  • The end of the line: New York City’s iconic MetroCard is about to go out of service

    [ad_1]

    For more than three decades, lifelong New Yorkers and tourists visiting the Big Apple have shared the experience of a MetroCard swipe gone wrong. Swiping the transit card too fast or too slow, with the stripe facing the wrong side, or having insufficient fare all led to the subsequent, seemingly judgmental thud of the turnstile slamming into you.”It’s embarrassing. You feel like you’re not an authentic New Yorker if you’re not swiping your MetroCard the right way,” said Mike Glenwick, 37, who has lived in the city most of his life and has been collecting limited-edition MetroCards since he was six.Now the days of swiping the blue and yellow plastic cards are numbered. Come January 1, the Metropolitan Transit Authority will no longer sell MetroCards, and riders will be required to use OMNY, a contactless fare payment system. (Existing MetroCards will continue to be accepted at terminals, though MTA said their “final acceptance date will be announced at a later time.”)Bidding farewell to the card has been a journey for New Yorkers and the MTA alike.From tokens to cardsNew York City subway’s iconic tokens were the default form of fare payment before the MetroCard was introduced. When tokens were initially rolled out in 1953, they were about the size of a dime and most had a hollowed-out Y between an engraved N and C, spelling out NYC.Though clunky to carry around, they were easy to use: all transit passengers had to do was drop the tokens into a turnstile or farebox. For the MTA, it overcame the issue of being able to increase fares without having to redesign fare collection systems to accept various kinds of coins.But in 1983 Richard Ravitch, then the commissioner of the MTA, began to envision a different fare payment system. Instead, he floated a magnetic stripe card with a stored value.”His argument was that New York is a very modern cosmopolitan city and there are other modern cosmopolitan cities that are using this as their fare payment system,” said Jodi Shapiro, curator of the FAREwell MetroCard exhibit at the New York Transit Museum. But as his idea gained traction, it quickly became about more than just keeping up with other cities. At one point the MTA considered integrating MetroCards with pay phones so callers didn’t have to use coins (that didn’t end up happening, though).The MTA initially thought the shift to MetroCards would “spell the death knell for fare evasion” since many riders were previously getting away with using various other kinds of coins and tokens, said Noah McClain, a sociology professor who has researched MetroCard technology and fare evasion trends. But that was hardly the case: “Fare evasion certainly endured, albeit often in different forms.”One famous one, “swipers,” as they came to be known, sold bent MetroCards that allowed riders to fraudulently bypass turnstiles. Separately, a group of hackers was able to successfully reverse engineer many parts of the MetroCard.But riders saw benefits, too. One of the biggest selling points for the MetroCard was that users could purchase different, more flexible fares. That included discounts for seniors, disabled people and students, as well as cards that offered unlimited rides throughout the month.Cards also came with a massive perk that tokens didn’t: free transfers. One swipe of a MetroCard on a bus or subway meant riders didn’t have to pay again if they transferred to another bus or subway train.A collector’s itemBut just as New York subway tokens became icons of the city, so did the MetroCard. And that was by design.”MetroCards were made to be collected,” Shapiro said. The year the MTA launched the MetroCard, 1994, was also when it released an inaugural limited edition card. Since then there have been around 400 commemorative MetroCards issued. Some of those have featured advertisements, a major source of revenue for the MTA, while others have commemorated historic events, such as Grand Central’s centennial anniversary and the first game between the Yankees and Mets in 1997, a tradition now known as the “Subway Series.”Other notable cards include the Supreme-branded ones and the David Bowie ones aimed at marketing a museum exhibit timed to the release of cards. New Yorkers reported hours-long lines to purchase these at stations.Glenwick has nearly 100 MetroCards in his collection, and his first featured members of the New York Rangers after the team won the Stanley Cup in 1994 for the first time in 54 years.The idea to collect MetroCards immediately clicked for him: “It was something that was accessible to collect. I didn’t spend extra money because we used the MetroCards anyway,” he said.An art mediumThomas McKean has lost track of how many MetroCards he’s accumulated over the past 25 years. It all started on a subway ride where he forgot to bring a newspaper or a book, something he’d typically do before the age of smartphones.In their absence, to pass the time, he stared at his MetroCard, idly wondering how many words he could wring from its letters. When he got off the subway, he grabbed a fistful of MetroCards lying around on the ground of the station, and once he got home, he started making MetroCards with different words.”And then without even realizing it, I got hooked because I love the material and aesthetic,” McKean told CNN. His designs were initially two-dimensional, using the front and back of MetroCards cut up and pieced together like a mosaic, but eventually he started experimenting with three-dimensional designs, too.McKean’s art has been featured at home goods store Fishs Eddy in Manhattan, as well as on the cover of a Time Out New York magazine. His art will also be featured at an upcoming exhibit at the Transit Museum’s Grand Central gallery. Over the years, he’s taken on several commissions. To his surprise, many of those customers aren’t based in New York and yet they exhibit the same admiration for the MetroCard as lifelong New Yorkers.McKean said he has several thousand untouched MetroCards left in his reserves in addition to all the scraps from prior projects. “I never throw anything away until it’s just too small to use.”A tap-and-go futureThe transit system going forward, OMNY, short for One Metro New York, replaces swipes with taps at turnstiles via smartphones or smartwatches with mobile wallets, credit cards or OMNY cards.For now, riders can still use cash to purchase OMNY cards for $1 at vending machines at subways and at retailers across the city. But many feel as though it’s a matter of time before the MTA stops accepting cash, like many retailers have, which has essentially excluded people who are unbanked and lack a credit or debit card. (The MTA didn’t respond to CNN’s request for comment.)”While there’s no doubt the MetroCard will remain an iconic New York City symbol, tap-and-go fare payment has been a game changer for everyday riders and visitors, saving them the guessing game on what fare package is most cost efficient for their travels and making using NYC’s transit system much easier,” MTA chief customer officer Shanifah Rieara said in a statement in March, when the phaseout of the MetroCard was announced.At the time, the MTA said the change will save the agency $20 million annually “in costs related to MetroCard production and distribution; vending machine repairs; and cash collection and handling.”But for all the benefits that the MTA has advertised OMNY contains, including unlimited rides after your 12th of the week, Glenwick is not ready to make the transition.”I feel like part of my childhood is disappearing… I don’t want to let it go until I have to.”

    For more than three decades, lifelong New Yorkers and tourists visiting the Big Apple have shared the experience of a MetroCard swipe gone wrong. Swiping the transit card too fast or too slow, with the stripe facing the wrong side, or having insufficient fare all led to the subsequent, seemingly judgmental thud of the turnstile slamming into you.

    “It’s embarrassing. You feel like you’re not an authentic New Yorker if you’re not swiping your MetroCard the right way,” said Mike Glenwick, 37, who has lived in the city most of his life and has been collecting limited-edition MetroCards since he was six.

    Now the days of swiping the blue and yellow plastic cards are numbered. Come January 1, the Metropolitan Transit Authority will no longer sell MetroCards, and riders will be required to use OMNY, a contactless fare payment system. (Existing MetroCards will continue to be accepted at terminals, though MTA said their “final acceptance date will be announced at a later time.”)

    Bidding farewell to the card has been a journey for New Yorkers and the MTA alike.

    From tokens to cards

    New York City subway’s iconic tokens were the default form of fare payment before the MetroCard was introduced. When tokens were initially rolled out in 1953, they were about the size of a dime and most had a hollowed-out Y between an engraved N and C, spelling out NYC.

    Though clunky to carry around, they were easy to use: all transit passengers had to do was drop the tokens into a turnstile or farebox. For the MTA, it overcame the issue of being able to increase fares without having to redesign fare collection systems to accept various kinds of coins.

    But in 1983 Richard Ravitch, then the commissioner of the MTA, began to envision a different fare payment system. Instead, he floated a magnetic stripe card with a stored value.

    “His argument was that New York is a very modern cosmopolitan city and there are other modern cosmopolitan cities that are using this as their fare payment system,” said Jodi Shapiro, curator of the FAREwell MetroCard exhibit at the New York Transit Museum. But as his idea gained traction, it quickly became about more than just keeping up with other cities. At one point the MTA considered integrating MetroCards with pay phones so callers didn’t have to use coins (that didn’t end up happening, though).

    The MTA initially thought the shift to MetroCards would “spell the death knell for fare evasion” since many riders were previously getting away with using various other kinds of coins and tokens, said Noah McClain, a sociology professor who has researched MetroCard technology and fare evasion trends. But that was hardly the case: “Fare evasion certainly endured, albeit often in different forms.”

    One famous one, “swipers,” as they came to be known, sold bent MetroCards that allowed riders to fraudulently bypass turnstiles. Separately, a group of hackers was able to successfully reverse engineer many parts of the MetroCard.

    But riders saw benefits, too. One of the biggest selling points for the MetroCard was that users could purchase different, more flexible fares. That included discounts for seniors, disabled people and students, as well as cards that offered unlimited rides throughout the month.

    Cards also came with a massive perk that tokens didn’t: free transfers. One swipe of a MetroCard on a bus or subway meant riders didn’t have to pay again if they transferred to another bus or subway train.

    A collector’s item

    But just as New York subway tokens became icons of the city, so did the MetroCard. And that was by design.

    “MetroCards were made to be collected,” Shapiro said. The year the MTA launched the MetroCard, 1994, was also when it released an inaugural limited edition card. Since then there have been around 400 commemorative MetroCards issued. Some of those have featured advertisements, a major source of revenue for the MTA, while others have commemorated historic events, such as Grand Central’s centennial anniversary and the first game between the Yankees and Mets in 1997, a tradition now known as the “Subway Series.”

    Other notable cards include the Supreme-branded ones and the David Bowie ones aimed at marketing a museum exhibit timed to the release of cards. New Yorkers reported hours-long lines to purchase these at stations.

    Glenwick has nearly 100 MetroCards in his collection, and his first featured members of the New York Rangers after the team won the Stanley Cup in 1994 for the first time in 54 years.

    The idea to collect MetroCards immediately clicked for him: “It was something that was accessible to collect. I didn’t spend extra money because we used the MetroCards anyway,” he said.

    An art medium

    Thomas McKean has lost track of how many MetroCards he’s accumulated over the past 25 years. It all started on a subway ride where he forgot to bring a newspaper or a book, something he’d typically do before the age of smartphones.

    In their absence, to pass the time, he stared at his MetroCard, idly wondering how many words he could wring from its letters. When he got off the subway, he grabbed a fistful of MetroCards lying around on the ground of the station, and once he got home, he started making MetroCards with different words.

    “And then without even realizing it, I got hooked because I love the material and aesthetic,” McKean told CNN. His designs were initially two-dimensional, using the front and back of MetroCards cut up and pieced together like a mosaic, but eventually he started experimenting with three-dimensional designs, too.

    McKean’s art has been featured at home goods store Fishs Eddy in Manhattan, as well as on the cover of a Time Out New York magazine. His art will also be featured at an upcoming exhibit at the Transit Museum’s Grand Central gallery. Over the years, he’s taken on several commissions. To his surprise, many of those customers aren’t based in New York and yet they exhibit the same admiration for the MetroCard as lifelong New Yorkers.

    McKean said he has several thousand untouched MetroCards left in his reserves in addition to all the scraps from prior projects. “I never throw anything away until it’s just too small to use.”

    A tap-and-go future

    The transit system going forward, OMNY, short for One Metro New York, replaces swipes with taps at turnstiles via smartphones or smartwatches with mobile wallets, credit cards or OMNY cards.

    For now, riders can still use cash to purchase OMNY cards for $1 at vending machines at subways and at retailers across the city. But many feel as though it’s a matter of time before the MTA stops accepting cash, like many retailers have, which has essentially excluded people who are unbanked and lack a credit or debit card. (The MTA didn’t respond to CNN’s request for comment.)

    “While there’s no doubt the MetroCard will remain an iconic New York City symbol, tap-and-go fare payment has been a game changer for everyday riders and visitors, saving them the guessing game on what fare package is most cost efficient for their travels and making using NYC’s transit system much easier,” MTA chief customer officer Shanifah Rieara said in a statement in March, when the phaseout of the MetroCard was announced.

    At the time, the MTA said the change will save the agency $20 million annually “in costs related to MetroCard production and distribution; vending machine repairs; and cash collection and handling.”

    But for all the benefits that the MTA has advertised OMNY contains, including unlimited rides after your 12th of the week, Glenwick is not ready to make the transition.

    “I feel like part of my childhood is disappearing… I don’t want to let it go until I have to.”

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Warnings, fines coming soon for MBTA fare evaders

    [ad_1]

    BOSTON — Scofflaws take notice: The MBTA announced Thursday it will launch a renewed effort to collect subway fares with written warnings and fines of up to $150 early next month.

    A wide-ranging transportation bond law in January 2021 spurred the restructuring of fare evasion penalties, and the T has not issued a warning or citation for the offense since at least that year, according to its annual reports. The T put 16 “fare engagement representatives” to work around the subway system starting in October and saw fare collection increases of up to as 35% at stations where the representatives were on-site.


    This page requires Javascript.

    Javascript is required for you to be able to read premium content. Please enable it in your browser settings.

    kAm$E2CE:?8 $6AE] g[ E9@D6 C6AC6D6?E2E:G6D H:== 368:? :DDF:?8 7@C>2= H2C?:?8D 2?5 4:E2E:@?D E@ C:56CD H9@ ECJ E@ 3@2C5 H:E9@FE 92G:?8 >256 2 A2J>6?E 2E 2 72C6 82E6 @C 3@I[ E96 % 2??@F?465 %9FCD52J] %96 DE2?52C5 @?6H2J DF3H2J 72C6 @? E96 |q%p 😀 Sa]c_[ @C S`]`_ 7@C A2CE:4:A2?ED 😕 E96 C65F465 72C6 AC@8C2>D E96 % @776CD]k^Am

    kAmp== 7:CDE @776?D6D H:== =625 E@ 2 7@C>2= HC:EE6? H2C?:?8[ 2?5 DF3D6BF6?E @776?D6D H:E9:? 2 E9C66J62C A6C:@5 H:== 36 AF?:D965 H:E9 7:?6D @7 Sd_ W7:CDE[ D64@?5 2?5 E9:C5 DF3D6BF6?E @776?D6DX @C S`__ W7@FCE9 DF3D6BF6?E @776?D6 2?5 36J@?5X]k^Am

    kAmQpD H6 4@?E:?F6 E@ :>AC@G6 D6CG:46 7C6BF6?4J 24C@DD 2== >@56D[ H6 92G6 >F49 >@C6 E@ 5@[ 2?5 H6 C6=J @? 6249 C:56C E@ A2J E96:C 72C6 2?5 DFAA@CE 4@?E:?F65 D6CG:46 :>AC@G6>6?ED] *@FC 72C6D 2C6 6DD6?E:2= E@ 56=:G6C:?8 E96 =6G6=D @7 D6CG:46 J@F 6IA64E 2?5 96=A FD 36EE6C DFAA@CE J@FC 4@>>F?:EJ[Q |q%p v6?6C2= |2?286C !9:= t?8 D2:5]k^Am

    kAmQ%@ @FC C:56CD H9@ A2J 7@C 6249 2?5 6G6CJ EC:A[ E92?< J@FP u@C E9@D6 H9@ >2J ?665 DFAA@CE H:E9 A2J>6?E[ A=62D6 C6249 @FE E@ FD 23@FE E96 C65F465 72C6 @AA@CEF?:E:6D H6 @776C 24C@DD 2== >@56D]Qk^Am

    kAmu:?6D 2C6 9:896C 7@C 42D6D @7 7C2F5F=6?E >:DFD6 @7 2 C65F465 72C6 A2DD] p7E6C 2? :?:E:2= H2C?:?8[ E9@D6 @776?D6D H:== 42CCJ Sfd 7:?6D 7@C E96 7:CDE[ D64@?5 2?5 E9:C5 :?DE2?46D 2?5 S`d_ 7:?6D 7@C 7@FCE9 2?5 DF3D6BF6?E @442D:@?D]k^Am

    kAmw6C6VD 9@H :?E6C24E:@?D H:E9 72C6 4964< 286?ED 2C6 6IA64E65 E@ 8@[ 244@C5:?8 E@ E96 %ik^Am

    kAmu2C6 C6AC6D6?E2E:G6D H:== QG:DF2==J 4964< 72C6D 2D E96J @3D6CG6 C:56CD 6?E6C:?8 72C6 82E6D 2?5 3@2C5:?8 G69:4=6D]Qk^Am

    kAmx7 2 C:56C 92D ?@E A2:5 E96 72C6[ E96 % H@C<6C H:== 2D< E96> E@ 5@ D@]k^Am

    kAmx7 E96 C:56C 49@@D6D ?@E E@ A2J E96 72C6[ QDE277 H:== 2D< 7@C J@FC xs E@ C64@C5 2 HC:EE6? H2C?:?8 H:E9@FE 2 7:?6 @C :DDF6 2 4:E2E:@? H:E9 2 7:?6Q @C H:== >2?F2==J 6?E6C E96 C:56CVD :?7@C>2E:@? @? 2? |q%p:DDF65 56G:46 :7 E96 C:56C 5@6D ?@E AC6D6?E 2? xs]k^Am

    kAmp7E6C 2 C:56C 😀 :DDF65 2 H2C?:?8 @C 2 4:E2E:@?[ E96J 2C6 7C66 E@ 4@?E:?F6 @? E96:C ;@FC?6J]k^Am

    kAm#:56CD H9@ C67FD6 E@ A2J E96 72C6 @C AC@G:56 xs :?7@C>2E:@? H:== 36 2D<65 E@ =62G6 E96 DE2E:@? @C G69:4=6]k^Am

    [ad_2]

    By Colin A. Young | State House News Service

    Source link

  • Commuters share opinions on the MTA’s proposed fare increases in 1st of 3 public hearings

    [ad_1]

    NEW YORK (WABC) — If the MTA gets its way and moves forward with its plan to raise fares, New Yorkers will fork over $3 to ride the MTA’s buses and trains, beginning in 2026.

    The proposed increase would also make it more expensive to reach the MTA’s weekly fare cap, which makes rides free after the first 12 trips in a week. The cap would rise from $34 to $36.

    Increases on the LIRR and Metro-North will average 4.4% to 8%. And even tolls on the major crossings will go up roughly 7.5%.

    Suburban riders, many of whom take commuter trains and the subways, will take the biggest hit. From Hicksville, a monthly ticket will cost roughly $300 and a one-way fare will top $15. It won’t be much better from White Plains where the monthly will top $270 with a one-way fare of nearly $14.

    Drivers on the Verrazano and the MTA’s East River crossings will be hit, too, with E-ZPass tolls hitting roughly $7.50 and $12 without E-ZPass.

    Many of the MTA’s long-standing discounts are being phased out, along with the MetroCard, in favor of the agency’s tap-and-go fare readers.

    Stoking the outrage is congestion pricing, where 80% of the tolls collected from that are supposed to go to the MTA.It’s a new revenue source projected to pump $12 billion into subways and busses, and another $1.5 billion to the LIRR and Metro North, and yet, the MTA is about to ask riders for more.

    “We have to make the budgets balance, that’s why these small incremental increases every year are so important,” said MTA CEO Janno Lieber. “Rider satisfaction level is way up.”

    The entire proposal is expected to be voted on by the MTA Board after three public hearings, the first of which took place on Tuesday night at the NYPD Transit Bureau at 130 Livingston Street in Crown Heights, Brooklyn, where New Yorkers made their voices heard.

    “Us standing here, passionate, deep. Our lives are on the line,” said one commuter who attended the hearing. “So, think about that in the sentence you’re making with the power you have absorbed from us as we’re out here struggling.”

    “Working class New Yorkers are caught in an affordability crisis,” said commuter Christian Joseph. “Food, rent, childcare and many other things. Basic necessities we need in the city. Transportation being one of them.”

    Eyewitness News also spoke with commuters ahead of the Tuesday’s hearing to get their takes on the proposed increases.

    “Too much money. The average person can’t afford what the fare is now, jumping the turnstiles, so that’s definitely too much,” one woman told Eyewitness News. “Weekend service is horrible … the homelessness on the train, the worrying about crime, yeah, no good.”

    “I don’t think that the fare should be raised any higher. I mean, people are struggling, you know, they’re trying to make ends meet, and now they’re talking about raising the fare again. It seems like they just raised the fare,” another commuter reacted. “Enough is enough.”

    If the proposal is approved, the increases would take effect in January.

    The MTA has consistently raised fares every other year, by roughly 4%, since 2009. An exception happened in 2021 when Gov. Kathy Hochul froze fares after the pandemic eroded ridership.

    Local politicians have also weighed in on the MTA’s proposed fare hikes.

    Mayor Eric Adams, who is running for reelection, said previously that he didn’t support the fare increases.

    “We have continued to fight for the cost of living in the city, I believe now is not the time to do an increase in fare hikes,” Adams said. “Some people would say, ‘Well, it’s just a slight increase.’ Every dollar matters when you are struggling.”

    Democratic mayoral nominee and frontrunner Zohran Mamdani has gone even further in proposing free bus rides for New Yorkers.

    Beyond city limits, Rockland County Executive Ed Day is calling for the MTA to immediately withdraw its proposed Metro-North fare increases for West of Hudson commuters, calling them “wholly unjustifiable.”

    “Our residents already face a value gap exceeding $40 million every year — paying far more into the system than they receive — while enduring inadequate, infrequent rail service and chronic underinvestment,” Day said.

    For those who can’t attend the remaining meetings in person, the MTA says the public can submit comments online, or via mail, or by calling (646) 252-6777 from 6:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. daily.

    Want to participate in person or remotely? The two remaining meeting times are as follows:

    Wednesday, August 20, 2025, 10:00 a.m. – 1:00 p.m.
    Wednesday, August 20, 2025, 5:00 p.m. – 8:00 p.m.

    ———-

    * Get Eyewitness News Delivered

    * More Manhattan news

    * Send us a news tip

    * Download the abc7NY app for breaking news alerts

    * Follow us on YouTube


    Submit a tip or story idea to Eyewitness News

    Have a breaking news tip or an idea for a story we should cover? Send it to Eyewitness News using the form below. If attaching a video or photo, terms of use apply.

    Copyright © 2025 WABC-TV. All Rights Reserved.

    [ad_2]

    WABC

    Source link

  • Why the National Guard Won’t Make the Subways Safer

    Why the National Guard Won’t Make the Subways Safer

    [ad_1]

    The millions of people who crowd into New York City’s busiest subway stations every day have recently encountered a sight reminiscent of a frightening, bygone era: National Guard troops with long guns patrolling platforms and checking bags.

    After 9/11 and at moments of high alert in the years since, New York deployed soldiers in the subway to deter would-be terrorists and reassure the public that the transit system was safe from attack. The National Guard is now there for a different reason. Earlier this week, Governor Kathy Hochul sent 1,000 state police officers and National Guard troops into the city’s underground labyrinth not to scour for bombs but to combat far more ordinary crime—a recent spate of assaults, thefts, and stabbings, including against transit workers.

    The order, which Hochul issued independently of the city’s mayor, Eric Adams, prompted immediate criticism. Progressives accused her of militarizing the subways and validating Republican exaggerations about a spike in crime, potentially making people even more fearful of using public transit. Law-enforcement advocates, a group that typically supports a robust show of force, didn’t like the idea either.

    “I would describe it as the equivalent of putting a Band-Aid on a hemorrhage,” William Bratton, who led the police departments of New York, Boston, and Los Angeles, told me. “It will actually do nothing to stop the flow of blood, because it’s not going to the source of where the blood is coming from.”

    Bratton’s success in reducing subway crime as the chief of New York City’s transit police in the early 1990s led then-Mayor Rudy Giuliani to appoint him as NYPD commissioner. He returned to the post under a much different mayor, Democrat Bill de Blasio, nearly two decades later. During a 40-minute phone interview yesterday, Bratton acknowledged that many New Yorkers perceive subway crime to be more pervasive than it really is; rates of violent crime in New York City (and many other urban centers) have come down since the early months of pandemic and are much lower than they were in 1990, when he took over the transit police.

    Bratton is most famous—and, in the minds of many, notorious—as a practitioner of the “broken windows” theory of policing, which calls for aggressive enforcement of minor crime as a precondition for tackling more serious offenses. The idea has been widely criticized for being racially discriminatory and contributing to mass incarceration. But Bratton remains a strong proponent.

    He blamed the fact that crime remains unacceptably high for many people—and for politicians in an election year—on a culture of leniency brought on by well-intentioned criminal-justice reformers. Changes to the bail system that were enacted in 2019—some of which have been scaled back—have made it harder to keep convicted criminals off the streets, Bratton said, while city leaders are more reluctant to forcibly remove homeless people who resist intervention due to mental illness. Bratton said that police officers are less likely to arrest people for fare evasion, which leads to more serious infractions. “We are not punishing people for inappropriate behavior,” Bratton said.

    The subways need more police officers, Bratton said, and Adams had already announced a deployment of an additional 1,000 last month. But an influx of National Guard troops won’t be as effective, he argued. They can’t arrest people, and the items they are looking for in bags—explosive devices and guns, mainly—aren’t the source of most subway crime. The highest-profile incidents have involved small knives or assailants who pushed people onto the subway tracks. “What are the bag checks actually going to accomplish?” he asked. “The deterrence really is not there.”

    Our conversation has been lightly edited for length and clarity.


    Russell Berman: What did you think of the governor’s decision to send the National Guard and the state police into the subways?

    William Bratton: I would describe it basically as a public-relations initiative that is the equivalent of putting a Band-Aid on a hemorrhage. It will actually do nothing to stop the flow of blood, because it’s not going to the source of where the blood is coming from.

    The problem with crime in the subways, as with crime in the streets, is the idea that we are not punishing people for inappropriate behavior, whether it’s as simple as a fare evasion or something more significant—assaults and robberies and, in some instances, murders.

    The presence of the National Guard in the subway system is not needed, not necessary; nor are, for that matter, state troopers. The NYPD and the MTA are fully capable of policing the subways and the train systems.

    Berman: This is going to remind people of what New York was like in the months and years after 9/11, when you routinely saw National Guard troops doing bag checks in busy stations. Was it more effective to do that then, because people were worried about what was in those bags? Now they are more worried about other things.

    Bratton: That was appropriate then. People understood that what the National Guard was looking for in that era were bombs. So the bag checks made sense. It wasn’t so much the level of crime in the subways. What they were fearful of was terrorists, so the use of the National Guard for that purpose was appropriate at that time.

    What is the problem in terms of crime in the subway? It is the actions of the mentally ill, who have been involved in assaults and shoving people onto the tracks. It is the actions of a relatively small number of repeat criminals. And what are the bag checks actually going to accomplish? If you are carrying a gun, if you’re carrying a knife, you walk downstairs and see a bag check, you’re going to walk back up the stairs and down the block and go in another entrance and go right on through. So the deterrence is really not there.

    Berman: Did those bag checks back then after 9/11 ever find anything significant, or was it mostly for making people feel like someone was watching?

    Bratton: I’m not aware that anything was ever detected. Might something have been deterred? Possibly somebody who was coming into the subway with a device and decides, Well, I’m not going to do it after all. But I can’t say with any certainty or knowledge.

    Berman: Governor Hochul is also proposing a bill that would allow judges to ban anyone from the public-transit system who has been convicted of assault within the system. What do you make of that?

    Bratton: It would be difficult to enforce. They’d be banned from the system, but if they’re on the system behaving themselves, who’s going to know?

    Berman: Earlier you mentioned that law enforcement should be punishing fare evasion more than they do. When people hear that, they might think of the “broken windows” theory of policing. These people aren’t necessarily violent; they’re just jumping the gate. Is your argument that you’re trying to address higher-level crime by prosecuting lower-level crime?

    Bratton: “Broken windows” is correcting the behavior when it’s at a minor stage before it becomes more serious. Somebody who’s not paying their fare might be coming into the subway system with some type of weapon. Oftentimes they’re coming into the system to commit a crime—or, if they encounter a situation in the subway, out comes a box cutter, out comes the knife, out comes the gun. The situation escalates.

    [ad_2]

    Russell Berman

    Source link

  • Subway emergency exit gates at some stations to test 15-second delay to help deter fare evasion

    Subway emergency exit gates at some stations to test 15-second delay to help deter fare evasion

    [ad_1]

    NEW YORK CITY (WABC) — The MTA has been rolling out pilot programs targeting fare evasion and trying to make riders feel safer. One such measure will put emergency exit gates on a 15-second delay.

    The MTA got approval from the state to implement the pilot program to put emergency gates on a short delay.

    Critics are concerned in an actual emergency, waiting 15 seconds to exit could put people in a dangerous situation.

    The timed delay will be tried out next month at three subway stations. All three have ample turnstiles for riders to access in case of an actual emergency.

    They include the 59th Street-Lexington Avenue Station in Manhattan, the Flushing Avenue Station in Brooklyn, and the 138th Street Station in the Bronx.

    The MTA is already looking at a long-term redesign of these emergency gates, aka “the gate of the future.”

    That’s just one of the ideas that the MTA is testing out at various stations. They’re also trying to gauge public support, and that has been a challenge.

    While some of the strategies have already proven successful, The New York Times said Tuesday morning, “New Yorkers have not been impressed.”

    The MTA installed yellow subway platform barriers at the Clark Street subway station over the weekend, the second station where the gates are being piloted.

    In Queens, the Sutphin Boulevard-Archer Avenue station has replaced the turnstiles with glowing green fare gates.

    Some transit riders have already figured out how to open the gates without paying, a technique quickly disseminated on TikTok.

    Despite the ridicule, revenue at that station has increased by 20% since implementation.

    These pilot projects are described by MTA as basic attempts to temporarily resolve complex problems.

    Transit officials are looking to see what works and what doesn’t. None of the ideas are expected to be long-term.

    As NYC Transit President Rich Davey said Monday of some of these challenges, if you don’t experience failure, you aren’t trying hard enough.

    ———-

    * Get Eyewitness News Delivered

    * More New York City news

    * Send us a news tip

    * Download the abc7NY app for breaking news alerts

    * Follow us on YouTube

    Submit a tip or story idea to Eyewitness News

    Have a breaking news tip or an idea for a story we should cover? Send it to Eyewitness News using the form below. If attaching a video or photo, terms of use apply.

    Copyright © 2024 WABC-TV. All Rights Reserved.

    [ad_2]

    WABC

    Source link