ReportWire

Tag: fans

  • This Might Be Why People Are Throwing Things At Performers At Concerts

    This Might Be Why People Are Throwing Things At Performers At Concerts

    [ad_1]

    This concert season might go down as the Summer of Hurling Objects: In the last few months, a number of music artists ― Harry Styles, Bebe Rexha, Drake and Kelsea Ballerini among them ― have been hit or interrupted by concertgoers throwing items at them onstage (beverages, vape pens, even cellphones).

    The most recent example? Cardi B, who had liquid thrown at her face mid-set during a performance in Las Vegas on Saturday. In response, the “Bodak Yellow” singer threw her microphone in the concertgoer’s direction, resulting in one audience member filing a battery report following the event.

    The incidents have been so numerous, some artists are preemptively warning their attendees to keep their belongings to themselves.

    “Have you noticed how people are like, forgetting fucking show etiquette at the moment?” Adele asked fans at one of her recent Las Vegas residency shows while toting a T-shirt gun.

    “People just throwing shit onstage, have you seen them? I fucking dare you. Dare you to throw something at me and I’ll fucking kill you,” she joked before shooting off a T-shirt into the screaming crowd.

    What’s the deal with this “trend”? Jennifer Stevens Aubrey, a professor of communication at the University of Arizona whose area of expertise includes media effects and audience behaviors, believes two factors are at play.

    First, after a long hiatus from public life because of COVID, people aren’t exactly on their best behavior; there’s been a noticeable erosion of manners and etiquette across the board, not just at concerts. (Drinking and other intoxicants lower inhibitions further.)

    Billie Weiss/Boston Red Sox via Getty Images

    Pink is among the artists who’ve had items thrown at them recently. Here, she performs as part of the P!NK: Summer Carnival 2023 tour during the Nucor Fenway Concert Series in Boston.

    More notably, though, she thinks it has something to do with the strengthening of parasocial relationships during the pandemic. Fans and audiences truly feel like they know these performers, and in their minds, they have a friendship, Stevens Aubrey said.

    “Fans are let into the informal daily lives of many of their favorite performers, making people feel like they have a rather intimate one-way friendship with these performers,” Stevens Aubrey said. “After all, they frequently ‘talk’ on their phones through these short-form videos. In the minds of the fans, they are friends.”

    When fans see these performers in person, they might hope for, and even expect, an actual two-way interaction to occur ― even ill-advised interactions involving random projectiles.

    “Throwing things at a performer can be considered violence, but another interpretation is that it is an act of desperation,” Stevens Aubrey said. “Like, this is their one and only chance to get the attention of the performer.” (John Lennon being shot and killed by a fan is an extreme example of this “negative attention is still attention from my idol” behavior.)

    Fan culture — and the need to document everything on social media — may play a part in this trend. Here, fans record with their phones as Halsey performs in New York City's Central Park in 2018.

    ANGELA WEISS via Getty Images

    Fan culture — and the need to document everything on social media — may play a part in this trend. Here, fans record with their phones as Halsey performs in New York City’s Central Park in 2018.

    David Thomas, a professor of forensic studies at Florida Gulf Coast University, said that the anonymity provided by a dark concert venue and a large crowd may encourage bad behavior.

    He thinks clout chasing on social media is at play, too. People want to go viral, and this trend mirrors a number of viral TikTok trends. (The “throw things in the air” challenge from years ago, for instance, or the recent “ice cream challenge” prank.)

    “Many find that attention or media coverage of any kind for bad or good behavior is rewarding,” said Thomas, a former police officer with expertise in the psychology of crowds.

    “There is no bigger stage than a concert in front of 20,000 fans, not to mention television and social media,” he told HuffPost. “The attention that the perpetrator receives at the expense of the artist is more important than enjoying the concert or possible injury that could be caused to the artist.”

    “Throwing things at a performer can be considered violence, but another interpretation is that it is an act of desperation. Like, this is their one and only chance to get the attention of the performer.”

    – Jennifer Stevens Aubrey, professor of communication at the University of Arizona

    Because many of the artists who’ve had objects thrown at them lately are women, some have speculated whether misogyny is a factor, too.

    “Certainly the more dramatic throwing things has been fans throwing things at women,” said Paul Booth, a professor of media and pop culture at DePaul University.

    Someone bizarrely tossed the cremated ashes of a fan’s mother at Pink at one of her most recent gigs, for instance. (“This is your mom?” Pink asked the fan. “I don’t know how I feel about this.”) And Rexha was left with a bruised eye after an audience member hurled a cellphone at her during a performance in New York City.

    “If this trend is for attention, people feel entitled to have women’s attention, and perhaps believe that women are more apt to give it,” Booth told HuffPost.

    The History Of Fans (And Artists) Throwing Things At Each Other

    Of course, this trend isn’t exactly new. (Remember how fans used to throw panties onstage at Tom Jones and Teddy Pendergrass concerts? If not, go ask your mother.)

    The Beatles and their fans at the height of Beatlemania provide another good example, said Martyn Amos, a crowd expert and professor of computer and information sciences at Northumbria University.

    When they toured the U.S. for the first time in the 1960s, the band gave a series of press conferences that were intended to showcase their “human side.” George Harrison made the mistake of saying that his favorite sweet was Jelly Babies, and at subsequent shows, the four men were pelted with the candies by screaming fans.

    “It was purely as an act of affection, but Harrison was not impressed,” Amos said. “In fact, in a letter to one fan, Harrison wrote, ‘Think how we feel standing on stage trying to dodge the stuff, before you throw some more at us. Couldn’t you eat them yourself, besides it is dangerous. I was hit in the eye once with a boiled sweet, and it’s not funny!’”

    At a Beatles concert at New York City's Shea Stadium in the 1960s, signs admonished the assembled Beatlemaniacs not to throw objects or cross the police line.

    Bettmann via Getty Images

    At a Beatles concert at New York City’s Shea Stadium in the 1960s, signs admonished the assembled Beatlemaniacs not to throw objects or cross the police line.

    Paul Wertheimer, founder of Crowd Management Strategies, a Los Angeles-based international crowd safety consulting service, pointed out that sometimes, it’s the artists who are throwing things out into the crowd or encouraging these types of interactions. (In the Cardi B case last weekend, additional footage showed both the rapper and her DJ urging the crowd to “splash her pussy.” Cardi was apparently peeved that she was splashed in the face with the liquid, rather than down there.)

    “This is not to condone those isolated incidents that put artists’ safety in jeopardy, but this is nothing new,” Wertheimer told HuffPost. “The examples being used these days are disjointed and do not have much in common.”

    “Who started throwing objects first is probably a chicken and the egg argument,” he added before listing all the concerts he’d been to where objects were thrown on or from the stage.

    “Fireworks were the projectile of choice at a 1973 concert by Led Zeppelin I attended in Chicago,” he said. “I’ve also been hit in the face by a small trinket thrown by Dita Von Teese in West Hollywood and pummeled by Faygo and liter bottles thrown by members of the Insane Clown Posse in Michigan.”

    Stephen Reicher, a professor of psychology at the University of St. Andrews in Scotland who studies how people behave in crowds, doesn’t think there’s enough information available to speculate on why there’s seemingly been an uptick in this behavior.

    He does think these interactions speak to the ambivalence, and sometimes antagonism, that tends to define the performer/audience relationship.

    “There’s no way you’re taking life seriously if you think I’m gonna pick this vape up and vape with you at the f**king Barclays Center.”

    – Drake, after an audience member threw a vape his way at a New York City concert last month

    “Much of this comes down to the question of ’who controls the performance?’” he said.

    “Is it the case that the performer is in control and the audience is passive — just a consumer of what they are given?” he wondered. “Or is it that the audience is active and directs the performance by dictating what the performer does, by heckling or something else.”

    Outside of these recent “throwing things at the stage” incidents, Reicher said, audiences have actually become much more passive and well-mannered in recent times ― at least compared to the more riotous audiences of the past that Wertheimer described.

    He also agreed that entitlement could be one of several reasons for this. Sometimes, throwing things is an act of ownership, “a ritual in which audience members try to impose their views on how a show should run,” he said.

    That seems to be what Drake thought when he got a vape pen thrown in his general direction last month.

    Vaping in front of, or for, an audience? The Canadian rapper was downright offended.

    “There’s no way you’re taking life seriously if you think I’m gonna pick this vape up and vape with you at the fucking Barclays Center,” the “Hotline Bling” artist said as he kicked around the vape onstage. “You got some real life evaluating to do, throwing this fucking lemon-mint vape up here, thinking I’m about to vape with you at the Barclays.”

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Hunter x Hunter: Why is Netflix removing the anime? Find out

    Hunter x Hunter: Why is Netflix removing the anime? Find out

    [ad_1]

    Hunter x Hunter, the beloved shonen franchise by Yoshihiro Togashi, has captured the hearts of anime fans worldwide. However, a recent announcement from Netflix has left fans disappointed. The streaming giant revealed that the Hunter x Hunter anime will be leaving its library, sparking questions and concerns among devoted viewers. Let’s delve into the reasons behind this decision and explore what it means for fans.

    Why is Netflix taking out Hunter x Hunter?

    One of the key factors behind Netflix’s removal of Hunter x Hunter from its platform is the issue of licensing. Like all licensed media, the anime’s availability on Netflix is subject to time restrictions. Unfortunately, this means that when the license expires, the content must be removed from the streaming library. 
    While this news may be disheartening, it’s important to remember that licenses can be renegotiated, potentially allowing the anime to make a comeback in the future.

    ALSO READ: 20 Best Anime Movies Of All Time: From Akira to Ninja Scroll; Explore here

    Will Hunter x Hunter continue its journey?

    Another aspect that fans are pondering is the potential release of Hunter x Hunter’s seventh season. As of now, there is no official confirmation regarding the production of a new season. With the anime currently comprising six seasons and a total of 148 episodes, fans are eagerly awaiting news about the continuation of the series. Although Netflix’s removal might raise concerns, other streaming services like Amazon Prime, Crunchyroll, Hulu, and Tubi still offer access to the beloved anime.

    Despite the disappointment caused by Netflix’s decision, the enduring popularity of Hunter x Hunter is evident. Yoshihiro Togashi’s Twitter following of 2.9 million people showcases the dedicated fan base that continues to support the series. This strong fan presence provides hope for the anime’s potential return to Netflix or the creation of new seasons in the future. While nothing is guaranteed, fans can take solace in the fact that their voices are heard, and the demand for Hunter x Hunter remains strong.

    As fans bid farewell to Hunter x Hunter on Netflix, they can explore other streaming platforms to satisfy their anime cravings. Services like Amazon Prime, Crunchyroll, Hulu, and Tubi offer a wide range of anime titles, including Hunter x Hunter. These platforms provide an opportunity for viewers to immerse themselves in the captivating world of Gon, Killua, Kurapika, and Leorio.

    Note: While Netflix’s decision to remove Hunter x Hunter affects the United States and Canada, the anime remains accessible in other countries where the streaming service operates.
     

    ALSO READ: 40 Best Amazon Prime series to watch right now – 2023

    [ad_2]

    1136954

    Source link

  • Pathaan: PM Narendra Modi tells ministers to avoid unnecessary comments on films; this is how social media reacted | Bollywood Life

    Pathaan: PM Narendra Modi tells ministers to avoid unnecessary comments on films; this is how social media reacted | Bollywood Life

    [ad_1]

    The Pathaan controversy has been widely covered in the media. In fact, every foreign news outlets picked up the Besharam Rang controversy where politicians and many religious leaders spoke about how the tangerine bikini worn by Deepika Padukone hurt Hindu sentiments. As we know, saffron (Bhagwa) is associated with Hindutva and Hindu religion. There has been a huge boycott call for the film. It has been reported that Gujarat multiplex owners have asked for Government intervention as they have got threats not to screen the movie. Now, it is being reported that PM Narendra Modi has asked his ministers not to comment on films unnecessarily. Also Read – Trending Entertainment News Today: KL Rahul’s Mumbai home decked up days ahead of nuptials with Athiya Shetty, Pathaan advance booking date out and more

    As we know, it is just 400 days to the nation wide elections. It seem he told the cabinet that the hard work done by ministers is drowned due to the statements of some politicians on films. He said that those comments dominate headlines on news channels and focus is lost from work. As we know, Madhya Pradesh’s Home Minister Narrotam Mishra made many comments on the orange bikini. BJP leader of Maharashtra Ram Kadam said that makers are mum as they want cheap publicity from the controversy. Fans have welcomed this move from the Prime Minister of India. Take a look at the reactions on social media… Also Read – Pathaan: Advance booking of Shah Rukh Khan’s comeback film to begin on THIS date in India

    Earlier in the month Suniel Shetty met Yogi Adityanath and said that he should request PM Narendra Modi to look into this boycott Bollywood campaign that is running on social media. While the PM did not take the name of Pathaan, we wonder what the fringe group leaders will say now! Also Read – Pathaan: Shah Rukh Khan starrer faces roadblock in Gujarat; threatened multiplex owners seek government intervention

    Stay tuned to BollywoodLife for the latest scoops and updates from Bollywood, Hollywood, South, TV and Web-Series.
    Click to join us on Facebook, Twitter, Youtube and Instagram.
    Also follow us on Facebook Messenger for latest updates.


    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Why Can’t I Stop Rooting for a God-Awful Basketball Team?

    Why Can’t I Stop Rooting for a God-Awful Basketball Team?

    [ad_1]

    When I attended a Washington Wizards open practice at D.C.’s Capital One Arena earlier this month, the focus was more on spectator entertainment than Rocky-style workouts. The season opener was a week away, and the players ran drills at half speed and engaged in silly skills competitions for fans, including a basketball version of Connect Four. But as a lifelong Wiz devotee, I was having an awestruck, love-you-man moment. Here I was posing for a photo with Phil freakin Chenier. Franchise royalty. My childhood idol. Back in the 1970s, when Chenier was draining jumpers and sporting a Richard Pryor mustache, the team routinely chased titles. These days? Not so much.

    Being an NBA fan who loves the Wizards is a little like being a foodie who adores turnips: It just doesn’t make sense. Since the 2000–01 season, only the Knicks and Timberwolves have lost more games. The franchise last advanced beyond the second round of the playoffs in 1979 (back when they were called the Bullets), and they’ve missed the playoffs 16 of the past 25 years. We fans have endured 40-plus years of frustration and disappointment, mainly from the typical issues—bad defense, bad draft picks, bad trades—but sometimes from … weirder ones: One All-Star player was charged with a gun felony involving a teammate, and another was once suspended without pay for being overweight. It’s all #SoWizards, to use a Twitter hashtag.

    And yet, I made it out to the open practice with a few hundred fans on a Tuesday night, wearing a Wizards T-shirt and feeling the faint, irrational warmth of preseason hope. Anyone can root for a winner. That’s easy. Last season, the NFL teams with the top-selling merchandise were the Cowboys, 49ers, Patriots, Steelers, and Chiefs. Each team finished with a winning record. In Philadelphia, the currently undefeated Eagles and the World Series–bound Phillies have generated a 20 percent or more increase in business for local restaurants, sports bars, and memorabilia stores.

    But rooting for the middling Wizards takes guts at best and is downright masochism at worst. Still, even though the team is more likely to bring me agony than elation, I can’t fathom supporting any other franchise. The same is surely true of my fellow Wizards fans—and many fans of other perennial losers (hey, the Detroit Lions somehow still have fans). So why do we stay hooked?

    My Wizards fandom began in the D.C. suburbs in the ’70s, when I was a Bullets-crazed kid devouring box scores on the sports page, shooting jumpers on a backyard dirt court, and pretending to be Chenier. I was 12 when the Bullets paraded down Pennsylvania Avenue to celebrate their only title, and the subsequent 44 years have brought lots of bad memories: Last season, the Wizards somehow blew a 35-point lead against the L.A. Clippers. The worst part? I wasn’t surprised.

    Recent pain should feel stronger than childhood joy, I would think—even for fans like me, whose support was passed down geographically. But these deep, die-hard roots can influence our adult behavior. “Early learning is incredibly powerful and hard to erase,” Chris Crandall, a psychology professor at the University of Kansas who has studied fan allegiance, told me. The team’s success 50 years ago may have boosted my childhood loyalty, Crandall explained, and their subsequent failures did not remove it. A new attitude (“Wow, these guys stink”) essentially “lays over the old one, but the old one is still there,” Crandall said. “And it’s very difficult to get rid of it.”

    I’m at least old enough to remember the team’s lone championship. The top memory for Wizards fans in their 30s is probably John Wall’s dramatic game-winning three-pointer in Game 6 of the Eastern Conference semifinals. The Wizards, of course, then lost Game 7. But one reason fans stick around is the perverse pride they have in their fandom, Edward Hirt, a professor at the University of Indiana who has studied sports-fan psychology, told me. Rooting for the Lakers or the Dallas Cowboys is like wearing khakis: You hardly stand out in a crowd. Loving the Wizards gives me a defiant sense of individuality. “Do you want to be like everybody else, or do you want to be different?” Hirt said. “The answer is neither. We want to be a little bit of both. We like feeling like we belong, but we don’t want to be seen as a clone of everybody else, either.”

    Supporting a loser satisfies both of those desires. I can commune with fellow fans at a sports bar or game, but when I walk through an airport, even in D.C., I’m often the only guy wearing a Wizards cap. And honestly, I like that. My Wiz fandom, Andrew Billings, a sports-media professor at the University of Alabama, told me, sends a message to the world: “How loyal am I? I root for the Washington Wizards.” (Which, let’s be real, would be a great T-shirt). In a 2015 study of students from seven universities, football fans were 55 percent less likely to wear team apparel following a defeat compared with a win. But those who do are making a statement: I’m not a fair-weather fan; I’m dedicated and trustworthy.

    Those noble qualities explain why fans of lousy teams despise fair-weather fans, Hirt added. Bandwagon fans skip the suffering but embrace the glory. If the Wizards somehow reached the NBA Finals this year, I’d be both thrilled and infuriated by the mobs of rapturous fans at downtown watch parties. Where were these bandwagon yahoos in 2001, when the team finished 19–63?

    But maybe winning matters less than we think—even for die-hard fans who react to each loss with a primal scream. In one 2019 study, fans of a college football team felt a two-day rise in self-esteem after a victory. But self-esteem levels didn’t drop significantly among losing fans. One of the reasons: Even if your team loses, you can raise your self-esteem simply by commiserating with friends, Billings, a co-author, said.

    Yes, suffering sucks, but suffering together has some upsides. It can be a social glue that intensifies bonds with the team and fellow fans. “Going through this hardship with your sports team makes you much more likely to stick with them,” Omri Gillath, a psychology professor at the University of Kansas, told me. Fans don’t just bask in reflected glory, or BIRG, as psychologists call it; they also BIRF—bask in reflected failure. “It’s about having a community of people that understand you and like the same thing that you do,” Gillath said.

    Last season, a friend and I attended the Wizards’ home finale, and they got shellacked by the equally lousy Knicks. But my friend and I enjoyed laughs over pregame beers. We made sarcastic comments as the Wiz turned a 10–0 lead into a 22-point deficit. I bought an end-of-the-season discounted T-shirt at the team store. Listening to Knicks fans hoot about their victory was annoying, but we had fun. And we bonded.

    But rooting for a losing team may be a dying phenomenon. Sports betting and streaming have made sports more solitary and less tied to where you live—undercutting some of the reasons fans endure their god-awful teams. “Geographic loyalty is particularly powerful for older generations, partly because they weren’t nearly as mobile with their jobs or their careers as younger people are,” Billings said. “I live in Alabama. If I wanted to be a Golden State Warriors fan, I could access all 82 of their regular-season games in a way that was not possible for older generations when they built their fandom.” Younger fans may also be more likely to follow a single player than a particular team, Billings believes.

    Let’s be clear: Winning is way better than losing. A 2013 study found that on the Monday after NFL games, fans of losing teams were more likely to consume saturated fats and sugars compared with fans of winning teams. But I truly believe—and maybe this is loser talk—that my decades of Wizards fandom have made me a better human. I have well-developed coping skills. My friends and I are like Statler and Waldorf, the crusty hecklers on The Muppet Show: We manage head-smacking losses with well-timed quips. I don’t get too elated after a victory—although victories mean more when they’re rare—or too down after a defeat. Hell, maybe it’s even made me more empathetic to people’s challenges. After all, most of us in life can relate more like the constantly struggling Wizards than the trophy-hoisting Warriors.

    Even though I know better, I’m optimistic this season won’t be a #SoWizards year. Maybe the team will jell. Maybe the young players will develop. Maybe the veterans will stay healthy. Or, you know, maybe not. A struggling sports franchise, I’ve decided, is like your idiot brother or jackass uncle. Despite all their obvious flaws, you still love them. And so I’ll cherish disco-era Bullets memories, celebrate the unexpected victories, cling to foolish hope, and brace myself for the worst. If they miss the playoffs—again—well, there’s always next year.

    [ad_2]

    Ken Budd

    Source link

  • Stadium Live Raises $10M Series A Led by KB Partners and Union Square Ventures to Build the Digital World for Gen Z Sports Fans

    Stadium Live Raises $10M Series A Led by KB Partners and Union Square Ventures to Build the Digital World for Gen Z Sports Fans

    [ad_1]

    Press Release


    Jul 28, 2022

    Stadium Live, the leading platform for Gen Z sports fans, today announced its $10 million Series A funding round led by KB Partners and Union Square Ventures. Kevin Durant’s 35 Ventures, Blaise Matuidi’s Origins Fund, Dapper Labs Ventures, Position Ventures, Valhalla Ventures, 6th Man Ventures, Alumni Ventures, and Breakout Capital also participated in the round.

    The company previously raised a $3 million seed round from Union Square Ventures, as well as Golden Ventures, Maple VC, Intonation Ventures, and Secocha Ventures.

    “Throughout my career, I’ve seen firsthand Gen Z sports fans’ desire to connect with their teams and fellow supporters on a deeper, more interactive level,” said Blaise Matuidi, co-founder of Origins Fund and 2018 FIFA World Cup Champion. “Stadium Live is the most relevant way for fans to gather and engage in the sports ecosystem. I’m very happy to be part of the Stadium Live adventure alongside an incredible champion like Kevin Durant.”

    Stadium Live emerged on the tech scene with an innovative sports platform, garnering over 500,000 users1 to date. The company is quickly becoming the go-to platform for a new generation of Gen Z sports fans. 

    Traditional sports viewership among Gen Z is on the decline, with Gen Z sports fans increasingly favoring short-form content on platforms like YouTube, Instagram, Snapchat, and TikTok2. They also increasingly identify themselves as gamers, with 87% of Gen Z playing games on their smartphones weekly, if not daily3. Gen Z is also an early adopter of vertical social networks centered around a specific interest. Vertical communities like Stadium Live are among the fastest-growing social platforms in the world4.

    Stadium Live combines elements of a social network with short-form sports-focused gameplay meant to appeal to a new generation of sports fans. The company is making waves in the sports tech space, particularly among the Gen Z audience which has clung to the platform for its unique combination of social features and sports gameplay. Ninety-three percent of Stadium Live’s users are Gen Z sports fans. 

    “We are thrilled to partner with Stadium Live on their mission to create new and unique experiences for a new generation of sports fans,” said Lance Dietz, Partner at KB Partners. “The future of fandom is evolving rapidly and Stadium Live is pushing the envelope on how fans engage with their communities, sports properties, and brands.”

    Stadium Live is a digital world where Gen Z sports fans express their fandom. Users create a custom avatar, collect unique items, chat and make friends with other sports fans, and participate in sports-focused gameplay and livestreams to earn coins and level up their avatar. Users then spend their coins on unique items for their avatar and power-ups to use in matches, and in one-on-one battles to test their sports knowledge against other players.

    “Stadium Live is providing this new generation of sports fans with a novel and mobile-first way of expressing their fandom,” said Andy Weissman, Managing Partner at Union Square Ventures. “We’re excited to continue to partner with Stadium Live as they continue to grow and redefine the sports industry.”

    A recent partnership with Fan Controlled Football, an up-and-coming alternative football league also taking a Gen Z-focused approach to football, was just announced with Stadium Live, playing a key role in enhancing the ways the league engages with its fans digitally.

    “The sports industry has been slow to adapt to a new generation of digitally native fans,” said Kevin Kim, CEO of Stadium Live. “We pride ourselves on developing a platform for the community and with the help of the community. Sports is more than just sports to Gen Z — it is culture, music, fashion, and so much more. Our focus is on building the tools to let people interact with each other within the metaverse. We’re building more than just an environment, we’re building a community.”

    Stadium Live is available today on iOS, with an Android release slated for Q4 2022.

    Product Screenshots & Videos can be found here: https://www.dropbox.com/sh/xq4s3xusuohl70s/AAAs13s4IDFpwk0MHJun6XxZa?dl=0

    About Stadium Live Studios

    Stadium Live Studios was founded in 2020 with one goal in mind: to revolutionize the sports industry by building the digital playground for millions of next-gen sports fans to play, hang out, and express themselves.

    Its platform Stadium Live is available worldwide on IOS and serves as a one-stop shop for sports fans looking to express themselves in a unique way, meet communities of like-minded fans, and compete for prizes.

    For anyone curious about what Stadium Live is doing next, sign up for the app for free on the App Store or visit stadiumverse.com. For press and partnership inquiries, please contact mat@stadiumliveapp.com.

    1User figure represents registered users who complete the creation of an avatar.

    2https://www.immersiv.io/blog/gen-z-sports-media-innovation/

    3https://fortune.com/2021/04/19/gen-z-gamers-video-games-media-entertainment-outlook-changes-future/

    4https://a16z.com/2020/12/07/social-strikes-back-fastest-growing-apps/

    Source: Stadium Live Studios Inc.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Austin Pets Alive! | 15 Austin FC Honorary Mascots Found Homes!

    Austin Pets Alive! | 15 Austin FC Honorary Mascots Found Homes!

    [ad_1]

    Nov 17, 2021

    Austin FC approached Austin Pets Alive! in 2020 with an innovative partnership opportunity.

    For the first time, an MLS team would feature adoptable shelter dogs as the Honorary Mascots for home matches. This unique opportunity showcases the shared core values of Austin FC and Austin Pets Alive! and we are excited to announce that fifteen Austin FC Honorary Mascots were adopted and will no longer be sleeping in kennels at the shelter.

    Geraldine, Oso, Marmalade, Candy, Heidi, Missy, Corn, Peanut, Leon, Sunshine, Black Canary, Rey, Woody, Front Porch, and Minnie Winnie will spend the rest of their lives in warm, loving homes with their forever families. From all of us at Austin Pets Alive!, to Austin FC and all the fans, thank you for adopting, fostering, volunteering, and donating. We look forward to introducing you to the 2022 Austin FC Honorary Mascots!

    [ad_2]

    Source link