ReportWire

Tag: Barbie and Ken

  • Stop Calling Barbie “Escapist Fun”

    Stop Calling Barbie “Escapist Fun”

    [ad_1]

    For the most part, Barbie has held fast to its reputation as an old school work of art in the (im)pure studio system sense of the word. Hand-painted sets, huge backlots and no expense spared for costuming all add up to a movie the likes of which modern audiences haven’t seen in who knows how long…when you don’t count Marvel and DC movies. The big budget allotted to Greta Gerwig’s film is always a rarity for a “women’s movie,” and one that doesn’t “technically” require a lot of special effects. Something Gerwig also offers in spades with subtler moments like Barbie’s convertible overturning, causing her to land with a thud that leaves behind animated pink smoke clouds. 

    Amid the usual backlash that always tends to arrive when something has been oversaturated, the accusation that Barbie is just more capitalist propaganda designed to bolster Mattel’s sales has perhaps only added to the idea that the movie is nothing but “fluff.” Or, that most odious term, “escapist fun.” The cliche that so many critics and “amateurs” (read: anyone with a website) like to use when describing a film that is comedic and fantastical. Therefore, automatically “frothy.” Barbie has proven no exception to the rule, despite its overtly pleading message for the demise of patriarchy. One that many men and women alike are uncomfortable processing unless they can laugh it off (ha ha ha!) and bill it as comedy rather than something that cuts way too close to the quick of reality.

    But Gerwig knows perhaps better than most that the truth is often far more painful than people can deal with “straight up”—it needs to be mitigated with a comedic tincture. And Barbie is sure to offer that in spades (something Mattel is likely happy about to help dilute the “mature thematic elements”). Between reminding audiences of how she drinks from a cup with nothing in it to how incongruous it is to walk around on tiptoes, the “subtle touches” are what contribute to Barbie’s hilarity. 

    Less funny, alas, is Ken (Ryan Gosling) horning in on Barbie’s (Margot Robbie) journey to the Real World (so Barbie can repair the rip in the portal between it and Barbie Land, therefore stop the cellulite she’s now got from spreading further). Not only is that in and of itself a signal of Ken’s (a.k.a. “men’s”) total lack of consideration for what Barbie wants (which is to go it alone), but the general assumption that men make about how their own wants and “needs” should usurp those of women. When Barbie realizes Ken has stowed away in her fly pink convertible (after he interrupts her solo singalong sesh to Indigo Girls’ “Closer to Fine”), she’s not, as he would expect, pleased to see him, so much as irritated by the inconvenience of his presence. “You’ll just slow me down,” she tells him. But he keeps needling and pressuring. And so, of course, wanting to be “nice” (as all women who twist themselves in knots to be “liked” do), she lets him stay along for the ride. 

    This tiny act of “kindness” on her part turns out to unleash the main “Act Two problem” of Barbie: Ken unearthing that patriarchy governs the Real World. A Pandora’s box (or Ken’s box) that, once opened, can only unleash all the same patriarchy-driven ills of the Real World onto Barbie Land. A consequence that Barbie hardly anticipated when she first set out to correct the breach in realms. One, as Weird Barbie (Kate McKinnon) tells her, that’s caused by the sadness of the little girl who’s playing with her. Only, as it transpires, the girl playing with her isn’t so little. She’s a grown woman and a mom, not to mention an assistant (who dabbles as an illustrator of Barbie concepts) of some kind to the CEO at Mattel (though, in the credits, she’s billed as “employee at Mattel”—for everyone below the executive level is just “employee,” right? No need to get more specific than that). Her name? Gloria (America Ferrera). Her venomous tween daughter? Sasha (Ariana Greenblatt). It’s the latter who cuts Barbie down to size, so to speak, by calling her a fascist who represents everything that’s wrong with the world, and how women are viewed in it. 

    Causing her to cry for the second time since being in the Real World, Barbie can’t believe that “her kind” is seen like this by the women she thought she had brought peace, harmony and equal rights to. Subsequently approached at her lowest moment by handlers (not Ruth or Barbara) from Mattel, she goes with them in their black SUV to meet the CEO (Will Ferrell), who has big plans to put her back in her box (yes, it’s very symbolic of what men do to women in general as well). Barbie, still too trusting and naive after exiting the Garden of Eden, as it were (indeed, Gerwig has turned the Adam and Eve story on its ear by calling out how Ken is sprung from Barbie’s proverbial rib), goes along for the ride. All while Ken watches from afar, now with the diabolical knowledge of patriarchy that he plans to take back to the other Kens in Barbie Land so that it will become the “Kendom.”

    As viewers watch Barbie become unsettled by the subjugation and constantly-looming sense of anxiety she endures as a woman (caught somewhere between being a “real girl” and a Barbie doll, for a dash of Pinocchio influence), it’s almost impossible not to squirm in one’s seat over how familiar it all is. Ergo, not exactly making for much in the way of “escapism”—though one can see how it would be necessary to “Trojan horse” Barbie through that “visual cotton candy” lens. Bountiful in the use of bright colors and The Wizard of Oz-esque sets. For anyone can be distracted from deeper meaning by aesthetic beauty. Which is so often how Barbie has been overlooked as a “being” with more substance than her appearance. “Authentically artificial,” as Gerwig would say (though of her sets, not Barbie). 

    What’s more, Barbie explores, through Gloria, how women are expected to “put aside childish things” like playing with Barbies once they reach Sasha’s age. Already thrust toward the cold, hard adulthood that will stamp out their former comfortableness with exploring who they are through play, and through projections of different selves onto Barbie, or other toys they might engage with. As Ferrera put it, “Growing up is about leaving behind childish things, particularly for women. And not so much men [who] get to have their man caves and play their video games forever. And women, it’s like, ‘Toys away, do the chores, grow up.’ That was really what touched me about Gloria as a character. This woman somehow made it to adulthood holding onto the value of play, and the value of aspiration and imagination is, in a way, counterculture. [Women] can be a lot of things at once…we can be joyful and playful and imaginative and childlike and be a grown woman, professional, taken seriously.” At least, in the world that Barbie sets up. 

    Unfortunately, in the Real World outside of Barbie’s Real World, it’s as Proust (a fitting luminary to quote considering the “Proust Barbie” reference in the movie) said: “There is hardly a single action we perform in that phase which we would not give anything, in later life, to annul. Whereas what we ought to regret is that we no longer possess the spontaneity which made us perform them. In later life we look at things in a more practical way, in full conformity with the rest of society, but adolescence is the only period in which we learn anything.” A fact that Gloria seems to understand only too well. And something that Barbie, as she decides to navigate her way through the bizarre innerworkings of the patriarchal Real World, will also come to apprehend once she becomes a “permanent resident.” 

    So to call Barbie “escapist fun” diminishes what it actually does. And that is put a glaring spotlight on how women in the Real World are still subjected to the same form of treatment found in the era of classic films from which Gerwig culled much of her inspiration for the sumptuous visuals that have branded Barbie with this misleading assignation.

    [ad_2]

    Genna Rivieccio

    Source link

  • Blow Up the Patriarchy, Or: The Barbenheimer Experience

    Blow Up the Patriarchy, Or: The Barbenheimer Experience

    [ad_1]

    Perhaps what they don’t warn you about with regard to “the Barbenheimer experience” is just how jarring it actually is. Certainly, that’s the entire “point” of pairing these two films together, the reason the internet has gone apeshit: because they’re so “divergent.” In fact, the phenomenon has proven to be such an excitement to people that they’ve gone “through the archives” to find similar instances of unlikely movie pairings released the same week. Such examples include Jumanji and Heat, The Matrix and 10 Things I Hate About You and The Dark Knight and Mamma Mia! It’s really only the latter example (complete with also featuring a Christopher Nolan movie) that comes vaguely close to capturing the sort of genre/color palette dichotomy that Barbie and Oppenheimer do. But, on a deeper level than that, watching Oppenheimer the same day or week serves as an even more blatant method for underscoring the horrifying patriarchal system that Barbie does. 

    In Oppenheimer’s case, of course, it’s unintentional. Because never was patriarchy in America at its strongest and most accepted than in the mid-twentieth century. Nor could Nolan have planned for a movie about garden-variety male toxicity to have coincided so seamlessly with an actual moviegoing trend/phenomenon. The pairing of these two films fundamentally speaking to how patriarchy destroys lives in far more literal ways than figurative ones. While Barbie (Margot Robbie) at least gets to experience life as it should be under matriarchy in Barbie Land, maybe it’s almost worse to know what that sense of peace and freedom is like only to be forced to enter Real World territory, where males rule with an iron/button-pushing (a bomb allusion) fist. 

    Upon seeing how things are done in Real World, Ken (Ryan Gosling) decides he can no longer be subjected to the “tyranny” of matriarchal dominance. Of being unable to force a Barbie to do anything he wants them to (i.e., return his affection), least of all the specific one he’s pining over. Because, in Barbie Land, men a.k.a. Kens are just background. In J. Robert Oppenheimer’s (Cillian Murphy) world, it’s women who are very much peripheral, serving only as vague sexual impressions. Yet there’s never any issue with making a woman “his.” Except his on-again, off-again paramour, Jean Tatlock (Florence Pugh). Unfortunately for Oppenheimer, she’s the type of “Berkeley free spirit” who can never seem to be pinned down. Oppenheimer’s eventual wife, Katherine (Emily Blunt), on the other hand, is only too eager to take a fourth husband in “Oppi.” 

    And yet, for as important as these women are in Oppenheimer’s life (not to mention being the only sign of women anywhere within this filmic landscape), they’re really just cursory and occasional “presences” that only interrupt the “real” work he’s doing. The truly “significant” aspect of his life. Which becomes helping male politicians destroy the world in the name of war. With Oppenheimer himself growing (like a mushroom cloud) so consumed and titillated by the resources (financial or otherwise) the government provides him with in the name of scientific research, he loses sight of the monster he’s actually creating. Perhaps as Ruth Handler (Rhea Perlaman) once did as well. Not knowing that the woman she unleashed onto the world—the one quite literally made to show girls that they could be anything—only served to further highlight all the things they would never be, both body-wise and career-wise. Therefore, Handler ended up actually accenting a more palpable and depressing divide between reality and what should be…as opposed to conjuring a beacon of hope and feminism in Barbie. And yes, it bears noting that, despite all her evolutions, Mattel has never seen fit to release a “Body Positivity” Barbie. Maybe because they know just how hollow that would come across at this juncture. Though false intentions never stopped a capitalist from trying to make a fast buck. In short, to capitalize

    Obviously, Handler and Oppenheimer are by no means comparable for what they created—though each one did offer up, in some sense, a kind of Frankenstein. Gerwig appears to know that only too well by making Handler a prominent character in Barbie. A conceit that might seem a bit out of left field to some, but is actually entirely appropriate considering she was the brainchild behind Mattel’s best-selling and most iconic toy. And it’s cruelly ironic that Handler’s “ghost” should be left to haunt the seventeenth floor of corporate headquarters while the suits with no insight into women benefit from her invention. For yes, she was eventually forced to resign from Mattel in 1974 after the taxman cracked down on her for false financial reporting (something Gerwig refers to with a joke that Ruth herself makes in the movie).

    Difficulty getting along with the government appears to be a common characteristic in those who simply want to create. For Oppenheimer, too, was viewed with malice and contempt by the very political machine that was dependent upon him for developing an atomic weapon. One that turned out, in the end, to be rather needless as Japan would have surely surrendered without it. But such is the nature of patriarchy, with every man “in charge” needing to prove that his power is authoritative and incontrovertible by swinging his dick around while lives hang in the balance. 

    Oppenheimer makes that disgustingly clear when Henry L. Stimson (James Remar), the Secretary of War at the time, decides they shouldn’t bomb Kyoto because he and his wife honeymooned there and it’s a “lovely” place that has cultural value not just to him, but the Japanese. In other words, fuck those arbitrary shitholes, Hiroshima and Nagasaki. To see a scene like this play out is indicative of just how damaging patriarchy is, for it is a system run by a gender that thrives on violence, ego and heartless decision-making. A gender that proves, ultimately, gender is no illusion; for this particular one feeds on destruction, whereas the female one is founded metaphorically and literally on creation. The great yin and yang endeavors of each type of being. 

    So yes, more than merely a means to appreciate the contrasting cinematography styles of Hoyte van Hoytema and Rodrigo Prieto, the Barbenheimer experience does feel somehow essential. Like it shouldn’t get reduced to being categorized as “frivolous pandering to internet tastemaking,” but rather, seen as a brutal and unique way to watch how patriarchy upends male and female lives alike on a daily basis. All because someone wanted to prove he has clout and “intelligence.” Though the dumbest thing of all is to assume that one has any significance whatsoever in the grand scheme. 

    Especially a grand scheme that might now invariably include going “kabluey” because a man wanted to show off the prowess of his mind knowing full well that said result would be used for evil. Indeed, quoting from a Hindu scripture, Oppenheimer would say of his creation, “Now I am become Death, destroyer of worlds.” In some sense, Barbie destroyed worlds as well. Bringing “fire” to the “cavewomen” who were still stuck playing with (read: playing at mothering) baby dolls throughout their childhood. Accordingly, this is the very scene Greta Gerwig rightly chooses to commence Barbie with. And would that playing with/learning to emulate a “slutty” doll was the most affronting and harmful thing a man (/man-boy) ever did. 

    [ad_2]

    Genna Rivieccio

    Source link

  • In Barbie, As In Life, Patriarchy Is the Insidious Force Turning Women’s Lives Upside Down

    In Barbie, As In Life, Patriarchy Is the Insidious Force Turning Women’s Lives Upside Down

    [ad_1]

    It’s among the few mononyms that invoke an immediate visceral reaction—whether reverent or contemptuous—within people. God. Madonna. Barbie. And, like the aforementioned Italian-American pop star, Barbie, too, is a baby boomer, “born” (just a year after Madonna) in 1959—and yet another girl who would change “the game” for all of womankind irrevocably. And that game, of course, is the one called Patriarchy. The system that’s set up to make sure pretty much everyone without a (congenital) white dick will fail. Or at least have a much more arduous time succeeding. And for those who say that’s just “a copout” “now,” one need only refer to a pointed line in Barbie from a white male Mattel employee: “We’re still doing [patriarchy], we just hide it better now.”

    This admission echoes something Seymour (Steve Buscemi) from Ghost World tells Enid (Thora Birch): “I suppose things are better now, but…I don’t know, it’s complicated. People still hate each other…but they just know how to hide it better.” In Barbie Land, no one hates anyone. Except maybe Ken (Ryan Gosling). The “man” who becomes the surprising (yet somehow totally expected) antagonist as the narrative of Greta Gerwig and Noah Baumbach’s script goes on. Because, as it is for many an incel, a latent resentment toward a woman who won’t “put out” starts to brew and bubble to the surface within Ken as he not only competes with the other multi-ethnic Kens for Barbie’s attention, but also deals with the brutal realization that Barbie is never going to 1) let him stay the night at her Dreamhouse or 2) look at him as anything other than ultimately platonic background to her Technicolor dream life. 

    As for the Stereotypical Barbie (Margot Robbie) he’s after, she’s starting to feel a few cracks in the pristine veneers of her world. It starts with unwanted thoughts of death as she interrupts her usual nightly dance party with the question no one wants to hear, “Do you guys ever think about dying?” When the reaction results in deafening silence and horrified glances, Barbie saves the mood by rephrasing it as, “I’m dying to dance!” Even on those pointed-toe feet of hers. Or at least, they were pointed—until the thoughts of death came. That turns out to be the harbinger for cold showers, burnt plastic toast, imaginary milk that’s expired and, yes, flat feet. 

    Sharing this news with the other Barbies, they not only shriek in disgust, but also inform her that she’s going to have to see “Weird Barbie” (Kate McKinnon) about this. Weird Barbie is the only one who knows how to fix “weird” things, after all. She’s sort of the Shakespearean answer to the Weird Sisters in Macbeth like that. And also the answer to Barbie’s dose of a The Matrix allusion—except rather than offering her a blue pill, red pill scenario, Weird Barbie offers her a high heel, Birkenstock scenario. The latter, obviously, meant to represent knowing the truth about the Real World—where nothing is nearly as effortlessly glamorous or pretty as it is in Barbie Land. 

    Although Barbie picks the high heel—stay in Barbie Land and know nothing of the Real World—unfortunately, she’s told that the shoes were only meant as a ceremonial way for Weird Barbie to present her with the “illusion” of choice. But actually, she doesn’t really have one if she wants to get her pointed feet back and remove the blatant cellulite that’s started to form on her thighs. Weird Barbie also imparts her with the knowledge that, to “restore order” (a.k.a. “be perfect” again), she must find the sad girl who’s been “playing with her” (“We’re all being played with,” Weird Barbie adds) and reconnect so that the sadness goes away and stops infecting Barbie’s body and mind. 

    “Leaving Oz,” as it were, is no easy feat though. Far more difficult than simply “following the yellow brick road,” let’s put it that way. And yet, there’s no challenge Barbie can’t surmount—even when she’s no longer feeling quite as powerful in her “lusterless” state. “Lusterless,” in this case, being a lot like what Jennifer Check (Megan Fox) in Jennifer’s Body describes as, “My skin is breaking out, and my hair is dull and lifeless. God. It’s like I’m one of the normal girls.” And Barbie was never meant to be “normal.” Even if that’s what “normal” girls have been indoctrinated to believe is normal. She’s supposed to be extraordinary (effortlessly so), precisely because Barbie is Woman. Everything to everyone, everything all the time. And it is in this spirit of how the doll is meant to represent “women” that sets off Gloria (America Ferrera), an illustrator who works at Mattel and rescues B from the execs who want to literally put her back in a box, on a tirade not unlike what Camille Rainville explored with her “Be A Lady They Said” text. 

    A text that, just as Gloria’s speech does, expounds on all the ways in which women are damned if they do, and damned if they don’t. “Be sexy, but not too sexy…” or, to use a portion from Rainville’s statement on how women can never live up to the impossible and conflicting standards (let alone the standards of a “Barbie body”) they’re held to by a merciless patriarchal society: “Be a lady they said. Don’t be too fat. Don’t be too thin. Eat up. Slim down. Stop eating so much. Order a salad. Don’t eat carbs. Skip dessert. Go on a diet. God, you look like a skeleton. Why don’t you just eat? You look emaciated. You look sick. Men like women with some meat on their bones. Be a size zero. Be a double zero. Be nothing. Be less than nothing.” Be whatever he wants you to be at any given moment. And yet, because Barbie Land is actually that rare thing—a matriarchy—the Kens who exist within it have never known anything like what the men of the Real World get to “enjoy” (if subjugating is what you’re into): total power and control. When Ken sees how Real World “functions” upon crashing Barbie’s “Restore Barbie Body” mission, he can hardly believe his eyes and ears. That, all this time, he could have been using his “Kenergy” to “make” Barbie his. 

    The thing he doesn’t account for—as so many men do not—is that no one can really “make” a woman do anything she doesn’t want to (though, not to be crass, the Taliban tries). Not when her heart isn’t really in something. And as we’ve seen happen in many a fairytale/Disney movie, when a woman is figuratively and/or literally locked up against her will (à la Rapunzel or Belle in Beauty and the Beast) by a man who didn’t get the message (she’s not interested), she’ll do whatever it takes to set herself free. And it is Gloria’s speech about the impossible nature of what it is to Be A Woman in Real World that becomes a means to deprogram the Barbies who have fallen prey to Ken’s “message of patriarchy.” With Stereotypical Barbie being the only Barb immune to the rhetoric because she had already been exposed to it in Real World, Gloria compares the way in which the other Barbies become so susceptible to this “plague” to how indigenous people fell prey to smallpox in the 1600s because they hadn’t experienced it before. Luckily, her speech is the vaccine, allowing Barbie and Weird Barbie (along with some questionably named discontinued models) to pluck the deprogrammed ones, Barbie by Barbie, and reinstate Barbie Land to its true status quo (though Stereotypical Barbie herself will never be the same again).

    Of course, the work of having to “teach” Real World men that they can’t always get what they want—women included—is something that Gerwig clearly takes very seriously. After all, she just had a second son with Barbie co-writer/frequent collaborator Noah Baumbach. She must indeed feel the weight of that—the responsibility all mothers have to raise sons who aren’t misogynistic pricks. And yet, it is the mother-daughter relationship that Gerwig addressed with such heartrending efficacy in Lady Bird that appears here again, too. Not just between Gloria and her anti-Barbie tween, Sasha (Ariana Greenblatt), but the one between all mothers and daughters, as Barbie witnesses the joy and pain of motherhood when Ruth Handler (Rhea Perlman), the creator of Barbie and a key talisman from earlier in the film, allows her the chance to feel like a human. Like a woman. And yes, some women “just” want to be ordinary. “Just” want to have children. “Just” want to be, full-stop. They don’t need the additional pressures of Physicist Barbie or Robotics Engineer Barbie. Maybe, as Gloria suggests with a new pitch to Mattel’s CEO (Will Ferrell), it’s “enough” (not to be confused with Kenough) to “just” be Ordinary Barbie. In short, being a woman “allowed” the same luxury as men—which is to be merely “mediocre” without risking condemnation. 

    With Barbie, one hopes the very clear message will get across to younger generations of men and women, who can both understand not only the damage patriarchy does, but also the fact that it’s not always an end all, be all “goal” to secure a romantic partner just because that’s what you’ve been told you “should” do. Alas, will Barbie, in the end, be just another “thing” patriarchal-run industries and governments can point to and say, “See, we let women ‘do’ things all the time” simply because they’ve become more comfortable with “letting” women “talk their shit” as a clever means to ultimately still keep them “in check”? That, one supposes, is something that only time and subsequent generations will tell (if they live long enough in this increasingly hostile environment to do so).

    [ad_2]

    Genna Rivieccio

    Source link