ReportWire

Tag: arms

  • Anduril founder Palmer Luckey is among the U.S. defense execs and companies sanctioned by China over arms sales to Taiwan | Fortune

    Beijing imposed sanctions on Friday against 20 U.S. defense-related companies and 10 executives, a week after Washington annoucned large-scale arms sales to Taiwan.

    The sanctions entail freezing the companies’ assets in China and banning individuals and organizations from dealing with them, according to the Chinese foreign ministry.

    The companies include Northrop Grumman Systems Corporation, L3Harris Maritime Services and Boeing in St. Louis, while defense firm Anduril Industries founder Palmer Luckey is one of the executives sanctioned, who can no longer do business in China and are barred from entering the country. Their assets in the East Asian country have also been frozen.

    The announcement of the U.S. arms-sale package, valued at more than $10 billion, has drawn an angry response from China, which claims Taiwan as its own and says it must come under its control.

    If approved by the American Congress, it would be the largest-ever U.S. weapons package to the self-ruled territory.

    “We stress once again that the Taiwan question is at the very core of China’s core interests and the first red line that must not be crossed in China-U.S. relations,” the Chinese foreign ministry said in a statement on Friday. “Any company or individual who engages in arms sales to Taiwan will pay the price for the wrongdoing.”

    The ministry also urged the U.S. to stop what it called “the dangerous moves of arming Taiwan.”

    Taiwan is a major flashpoint in U.S.-China relations that analysts worry could explode into military conflict between the two powers. China says that the U.S. arms sales to Taiwan would violate diplomatic agreements between China and the U.S.

    China’s military has increased its presence in Taiwan’s skies and waters in the past few years, holding joint drills with its warships and fighter jets on a near-daily basis near the island.

    Under the American federal law, the U.S. is obligated to assist Taiwan with its self-defense, a point that has become increasingly contentious with China. Beijing already has strained ties with Washington over trade, technology and other human rights issues.

    This story was originally featured on Fortune.com

    The Associated Press

    Source link

  • Trump warns Russia he may send Tomahawk missiles to Ukraine if war isn’t settled soon in ‘a new step of aggression’ | Fortune

    President Donald Trump on Sunday warned Russia that he may send Ukraine long-range Tomahawk missiles if Moscow doesn’t settle its war there soon — suggesting that he could be ready to increase the pressure on Vladimir Putin’s government using a key weapons system.

    “I might say, ’Look: if this war is not going to get settled, I’m going to send them Tomahawks,” Trump told reporters aboard Air Force One as he flew to Israel. “The Tomahawk is an incredible weapon, very offensive weapon. And honestly, Russia does not need that.”

    Trump said, “I might tell them that if the war is not settled — that we may very well.” He added, “We may not, but we may do it. I think it’s appropriate to bring up.”

    His comments came after Trump spoke by phone earlier Sunday with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, and Trump said he mentioned possibly sending Tomahawks during that conversation.

    “Do they want to have Tomahawks going in that direction? I don’t think so,” Trump said of Russia. “I think I might speak to Russia about that.” He added that “Tomahawks are a new step of aggression.”

    His suggestions followed Russia having attacked Ukraine’s power grid overnight, part of an ongoing campaign to cripple Ukrainian energy infrastructure before winter. Moscow also expressed “extreme concern” over the U.S. potentially providing Tomahawk cruise missiles to Ukraine.

    Putin himself has previously suggested that the United States supplying long-range missiles to Ukraine will seriously damage relations between Moscow and Washington.

    For his part, Zelenskyy described his latest call with Trump as “very productive,” and said the pair had discussed strengthening Ukraine’s “air defense, resilience, and long-range capabilities,” along with “details related to the energy sector.”

    Trump in recent weeks has taken a notably tougher tact with Putin, after the Russian leader has declined to engage in direct talks with Zelenskyy about easing fighting.

    Last month, Trump announced that he now believes Ukraine could win back all the territory lost to Russia — a dramatic shift from the Republican’s repeated calls for Kyiv to make concessions to end Russia’s war in Ukraine.

    But the U.S. president, at least so far, has resisted Zelenskyy’s calls for Tomahawks. The weapon system would allow Ukraine to strike deeper into Russian territory and put the sort of pressure on Putin that Zelenskyy argues is needed to get the Russians to seriously engage in peace talks.

    Trump said aboard Air Force One of the war: “I really think Putin would look great if he got this settled” and that “It’s not going to be good for him” if not.

    Fortune Global Forum returns Oct. 26–27, 2025 in Riyadh. CEOs and global leaders will gather for a dynamic, invitation-only event shaping the future of business. Apply for an invitation.

    Darlene Superville, Will Weissert, The Associated Press

    Source link

  • Natuv Inc. Will Attend SHOT Show 2024

    Natuv Inc. Will Attend SHOT Show 2024

    Meet Natuv Inc. at SHOT Show 2024

    Natuv Inc. is excited to once again attend SHOT Show. 

    Some of Natuv’s key personnel will be in attendance. 

    “For us, it’s always exciting, and we make the best connections at this event,” mentioned Ricky Brava, Chief International Officer, Natuv Inc.

    “Natuv Inc. is looking to expand at a national and international level and SHOT Show is always a great way to do so,” says Andrew Zambrowski, Chief of Business Development, Natuv Inc. 

    “Wherever you go during SHOT Week, you’ll meet members of our industry ready to share ideas and connect,” says Frank Anthony, CVO, Natuv Inc.

    SHOT Show is Jan. 23–26, 2024. Admission at the SHOT Show is open to businesses and government entities in the shooting, hunting and outdoor trade as well as commercial buyers and sellers of military, law enforcement and tactical products and services ONLY.

    About Natuv Inc. 

    Our mission is to deliver optimization and advancement to federal, tribal, state, and local governments through reliable, quality, and innovative technology, defense and logistics solutions. Natuv Inc. is an FFL-10 and FEL certified vendor. We support law enforcement, federal government and other regulated institutions with effective defensive solutions, arms, ammunition, surveillance technology, protective gear, less lethal armament and training, and combat drone technology, to name a few.

    For media and business development inquiries, contact Andrew Zambrowski, Chief Of Business Development, at andrew@natuv.email. For more information, visit https://www.natuv.com.

    Norman Office
    119 W. Main St.
    Norman, OK 73069 
    (405) 928-6111

    Logistics Distribution Center
    3700 South Purdue
    Oklahoma City, OK 73116
    (405) 928-6111

    Peru Branch Office
    Residencial San Pietro
    Calle Flora Tristán 486
    Oficina 1404
    Magdalena del Mar 15076
    Lima, Peru
    Office +511-493-9555
    Direct +1-347-755-0235

    Source: Natuv Inc.

    Source link

  • Natuv Inc. Range Day Marks a Remarkable Day of Unity and Collaboration

    Natuv Inc. Range Day Marks a Remarkable Day of Unity and Collaboration

    Natuv Inc. is thrilled to announce the resounding success of “Natuv Range Day,” a day of unity that took place on Aug. 29 2023 at the picturesque Las Vegas Metro Police Department Range. 

    This event brought together Native American law enforcement departments from all over the country along with defense industry representatives fostering camaraderie and promoting responsible firearm usage.

    Natuv Range Day took place during the National Native American Law Enforcement Association’s (NNALEA) 30th annual training conference. Natuv also participated in NNALEA, exhibiting with Walther and Black Rain Ordnance, and providing CLEET certified training with Paradigm Tactical Systems on less lethal advancement and deployment strategies.

    Natuv Range Day featured a wide range of firearms, including Walther’s PDP line, Black Rain Ordnance’s BRO-SPEC-15 in various calibers and sizes, Patriot Sports 9mm Ammo, Paradigm Tactical Systems Long Range Less Lethal, B&T APC9 PRO SD Fully Auto, Zev Technologies Core Combat Elite Rifle kitted with Antimatter’s new scope switch, Desert Tech MDRX, and the Desert Tech HTI .50 cal.

    “This event exemplifies the importance of continued support of Native American law enforcement and the sense of community that surrounds it,” said Devon Ekpenyong, Chief Operations Officer, Natuv Inc.

    “It’s wonderful to see people coming together to celebrate our shared interests while emphasizing safety and the protection of our communities,” said Andrew Zambrowski, Chief of Business Development, Natuv Inc.

    Natuv Inc. extends its heartfelt gratitude to all the participants, volunteers, sponsors, and partners who made Natuv Range Day a resounding success. Without your support, this event would not have been possible.

    For more information about Natuv Range Day and to view event photos and videos, please visit www.natuv.com or follow @natuvinc on your preferred social media platform.

    About Natuv Inc.

    Our mission is to deliver optimization and advancement to federal, tribal, state, and local governments through reliable, quality, and innovative technology, defense and logistics solutions. Natuv Inc. is an FFL-10 and FEL certified vendor. We support law enforcement, federal government and other regulated institutions with effective defensive solutions, arms, ammunition, surveillance technology, protective gear, less lethal armament and training, and combat drone technology, to name a few.

    Source: Natuv Inc.

    Source link

  • Should Your Flu and COVID Shots Go in Different Arms?

    Should Your Flu and COVID Shots Go in Different Arms?

    At a press briefing earlier this month, Ashish Jha, the White House’s COVID czar, laid out some pretty lofty expectations for America’s immunity this fall. “Millions” of Americans, he said, would be flocking to pharmacies for the newest version of the COVID vaccine in September and October, at the same appointment where they’d get their yearly flu shot. “It’s actually a good idea,” he told the press. “I really believe this is why God gave us two arms.”

    That’s how I got immunized last week at my local CVS: COVID shot on the left, flu shot on the right. I spent the next day or so nursing not one but two achy upper arms. Reaching high shelves was hard; putting on deodorant was worse. And it did make me wonder what would have happened if I’d ignored Jha’s teleological advice and gotten both jabs in the same arm. Maybe my annoyance would have been lessened. Or perhaps the same-side shots would have made the soreness in my left arm way worse. When I posed this puzzle to immunologists, vaccinologists, and pharmacists, I got back a lot of hems and haws. For the millions of Americans who will be getting two-shot appointments by fall’s end, they told me, the choice really does come down to personal preference in the absence of clear data: You’ve just gotta pick a side. Or, you know, two.

    On the one hand (sorry), there are the vaccine double-downers. Sallie Permar, a pediatrician at Weill Cornell Medicine, and Stephanie Langel, an immunologist at Duke University, both said they’d probably get both shots in the same shoulder; so would Rishi Goel, an immunologist at the University of Pennsylvania. “Personally, I’d rather have one arm that’s slightly uncomfortable than both,” Goel told me.

    On the other hand, we’ve got Team Divide-and-Conquer. Several experts said they’d follow the White House protocol of splitting shots left and right. Ali Ellebedy, an immunologist at Washington University in St. Louis, told me he’d prefer to have two slightly sore arms to one totally dead one. Jacinda Abdul-Mutakabbir, a pharmacist at Loma Linda University, says she generally recommends that her patients get the vaccines on separate sides “for comfort.” Last year, she opted to get the flu shot and a COVID booster within a few inches of each other, and “I wanted to chop my arm off,” she told me. “Never again.”

    The deciding logic here should be pretty intuitive, Permar told me. Two shots on one side might be expected to double how sore that arm will get, though the experience of each vaccine recipient will depend on a bevy of factors, including the ingredients in the shots and that person’s infection and vaccination history, as well as their immune-system health. Also, for people like my husband—who’s prone to very heavy vaccine side effects—the choice may not matter at all. He was so knocked out by the fever and chills that came with his COVID-flu-shot combo, he couldn’t have cared less which arms got the shots.

    I dug around for studies examining the consequences of the one-versus-two-arm choice and found only one: a Canadian trial from 2003, which vaccinated a few hundred sixth-graders at two dozen middle schools against group C meningitis and hepatitis B at the same time. Roughly half the kids got both shots in the same arm; the others received one on each side. (Some kids in the latter group requested that their shots be administered by a pair of nurses who could plunge both syringes at the same time.) Among students in the same-arm group, 18 percent ended up with tenderness at the injection site that they rated “moderate or severe.” But those kids fared better than the ones in the two-arm group, 28 percent of whom experienced moderate or severe tenderness in at least one arm, and 8 percent of whom had it in both arms at the same time.

    But those results apply only to that group of kids in that setting, with those two specific vaccines; there’s no telling whether the same trends would be seen with flu shots and COVID shots when given to children or adults. Michela Locci, an immunologist at the University of Pennsylvania, told me she suspects that combining flu and COVID inoculations in the same arm could actually drive extra side effects: “The overall inflammation might be higher,” she said.

    Many pediatricians, who often have to administer four or five shots to a baby at once, are habitual splitters. “If there’s more than one vaccine syringe to give to a baby, generally, two legs are used,” Permar told me. (Kids usually upgrade to arm shots sometime in toddlerhood—it’s all about finding a muscle that’s big enough for the needle to hit its mark.) Doctors also have a nerdy reason to split shots between arms or legs. “If there’s a local reaction to the vaccine,” Permar said, “you can identify which vaccine it was if you separate them by space.” (For the record, I had a more painful reaction in my left arm, where I got the COVID shot. Others I’ve spoken with have reported the same disparity.)

    The CDC advocates for separating vaccination shots by at least one inch of space. Per the agency, if a COVID shot is being given at the same time as a vaccine “that might be more likely to cause a local injection site reaction,” the shots should be dosed into “different limbs, if possible.” Two types of flu shots cleared for use in people 65 years and older—the high-dose vaccine and the adjuvanted one—fall into that category. But the different-limb advice doesn’t seem to apply to other flu shots, including those cleared for use in younger adults and kids.

    However someone ends up taking simultaneous flu and COVID shots, the placement is unlikely to affect how much protection the vaccines provide. There could be an argument for letting “each side focus on its own thing,” says Gabriel Victora, an immunologist at Rockefeller University. “But it probably doesn’t make a whole lot of difference.” Children routinely get combo vaccines, such as DTaP and MMR, each of which combines multiple disease-fighting ingredients in a single syringe. The triple-threat formulas work just as well as injecting their individual parts. The immune system is used to multitasking: It spends all day being bombarded by microbes, so there’s good reason to believe that with vaccines, too, our body will see simultaneous shots “as independent events,” Goel told me.

    Which arm gets picked for which shot, though, will affect where the jab’s contents end up. After a vaccine is injected, its immunity-inducing ingredients meander to the nearest lymph node, such as the ones in the armpits. There, hordes of immune cells fight over the vaccine’s bits, and the fittest and fiercest among them are selected to leave the lymph node and fight. Here, again, doubling up on one arm shouldn’t be an issue, Goel said: The immune-cell boot camps in these lymph nodes have “a good amount of real estate.”

    It might even be a good idea to stick the same limb—and thereby, the same lymph node—every time you get another dose of a particular vaccine. After immune cells in a lymph node spot a particular bit of pathogen, some of them march off into battle, but others may hang around like reserve troops, mulling over what they’ve learned. A couple of recent studies, one of them in mice, hint that repeated delivery of the same ingredients to those veteran learners could give the body a slight edge—though the extent of that advantage “might be marginal,” Victora told me. Still, Langel, of Duke, told me jokingly that because she usually gets all of her vaccines in her “non-writing” arm, the lymph node beneath it could now be especially superpowered—a “nice bonus” for her defenses on the whole.

    That said, no one should stress too much about getting a shot in the “wrong” arm. “It’s not like you’re immune on the left side and not on the right side,” Goel told me. Immune cells travel throughout the body; there is no midline DMZ. Permar even points out that getting the newly formulated COVID vaccine, which includes new ingredients tailored to fight Omicron subvariants, on the opposite side from the previous rounds could help its ingredients reach a fresher slate of cells. “I think you could convince yourself either way,” she told me. Which, honestly, leaves me totally at peace with my choice. Apart from arm achiness, I had no other side effects—and in a way, I preferred the symmetry of the one-on-each-side injections.

    With all that said, it’s worth briefly acknowledging a third option: Splitting the flu and COVID vaccines into separate visits. I was, before my most recent COVID shot, some 10 months out from my previous dose. But it felt awfully early for my flu shot, which might be better timed for peak protection if taken later in the season. Still, the allure of getting it all over with was too tantalizing, especially because I happen to have a lot of travel up ahead. In the grand scheme of things, the bigger, more important choice was opting into the shots at all.

    Katherine J. Wu

    Source link

  • New US Opinion Poll Shows 60% Favor Increasing Ukraine Arms

    New US Opinion Poll Shows 60% Favor Increasing Ukraine Arms

    Only 18% say domestic issues more important; Ukraine shocks America out of isolation

    Press Release


    Apr 5, 2022

    Shuler Research, a social modeling research group noted for predictions based on public risk tolerance, designed and sponsored a U.S. opinion poll, carried out by Greg Ling Insight Factory (https://greglinginsight.com/). Results were complete on April 2, one day prior to revelations of war crimes in Bucha, Ukraine. With 500 U.S. adult participants, the margin of error is 4%. Discussion of results can be found at http://shulerresearch.org, along with a link to graphical results and an identical volunteer survey that readers can participate in.

    A majority of 60% favored arming Ukraine with jets and long-range missiles, and other arms, to enable them to push Russia out. Only 27% felt assistance should be limited to helping refugees.

    Most surprising, only 18% felt domestic issues were more important. This suggests Ukraine could prompt single-issue voting in May-June primaries, or even in fall Congressional elections depending on how the conflict and opinion evolve. 

    Asked what historical situation Ukraine most resembled, 52% selected WW2 Britain, and 34% selected Czechoslovakia (which was split, reunited, and eventually split again). Most (76%) felt war crimes were committed by Russia, while 10% felt war crimes were committed by Ukraine. 

    Opinion was evenly split on whether Donald Trump would (1) further arm Ukraine, (2) pressure Ukraine to surrender or (3) only be concerned with obtaining evidence against Hunter Biden. This odd split suggests that no matter which position voters take on Ukraine, two-thirds will feel that Trump does not support their position.

    Asked which leader they most respected, 48% chose Volodymyr Zelensky, 16% each for Mateusz Morawiecki of Poland and President Joe Biden, 5% for Kaja Kallas of Estonia and for “none,” 4% for Vladimir Putin, and 2% each for Olaf Scholz, Emmanuel Macron and Trump.

    For more information about this topic, please call Shuler Research at 281-413-7713 or email directly at robert@shulerresearch.org.

    Source: Shuler Research

    Source link